Bollocks. absolute bollocks.. When i see it the shape reminds me of this. Paint skills off the charts
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Bollocks

absolute bollocks

+249
Views: 20106
Favorited: 72
Submitted: 04/07/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to echobase Subscribe to atheism E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(66):

[ 66 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#15 - powerlevel (04/07/2013) [-]
When i see it the shape reminds me of this.

Paint skills off the charts
#41 - historycanon (04/08/2013) [+] (1 reply)
BOLLOCKS!
User avatar #43 - captainfuckitall (04/08/2013) [+] (11 replies)
Except that aromatherapy and acupuncture are actually accepted forms of medicine and healing, and have scientific basis and research backing their results up

Something tells me that the person who made this list knows next to nothing about anything on it. Which really is the major problem I have with Atheists in general. Don't get me wrong, I love Science and I love Scientists far more than any religious practitioner, and while being religious myself, I have nothing but total respect and admiration for them. But seriously, an Atheist's logic really is as flawed as a religious person's

Religious Logic tends to be as so: I believe a *Insert anything spiritual here* exists because I have a doctrine that says so, I believe the doctrine is right because the *Insert anything spiritual here* exists, I believe a *Insert anything spiritual here* exists because the doctrine says so...

So on, so fourth. But from what I've noticed, Atheist logic is just as bad, if not worse (as many of them can be far more arrogant and annoying than any religious person I've met)

Atheist Logic tends to be so: I don't believe it exists because there is no proof it does, I don't look for proof because I don't believe it exists, I don't believe it exists because there is no proof it does...

So on, so fourth

See the pattern? Maybe if we just all swallowed our god-damned pride (no pun intended), and admitted that NONE of us really know EXACTLY what the hell is out there, whether in the universe or what comes after it, we can all try to work together and make something spectacular, instead of constantly trying to rip eachothers throats out and one up eachother because "HUR DUR, I'M SMERT BCUZ UR DUM"
User avatar #60 to #43 - ruebezahl (04/08/2013) [-]
Actually, there is neither a scientific basis nor research that backs up acupuncture. The "basis" of acupuncture is that there are mysterious energy streams running through our body. Very very scientific.

And the most extensive study of acupuncture that was conducted a couple of years ago showed that, yes, you get results out of acupuncture, but it does not matter where you actually place the needles. Let this sink in for a while. This contradicts the whole "Place the needles along energy streams" paradigm and it also showed that you don't have to spend a five digit sum on classes to learn acupuncture. Since that study, the main theories on why acupuncture "works" are that a) it desensitises you for pain or b) the doctor who performs acupuncture spends more time with the patient, which in itself has a healing effect or c) it's a pure placebo. I think b) and c) is quite likely, seeing how acupuncture works best for those problems where placebos are known to work well (such as migraines). So yes, acupuncture works about as well as a sugar pill.

For arometherapy, it's quite similar, actually.

And I have no idea which orifice you pulled that "Atheist logic" from. Perhaps you met one atheist who thinks like this, but that is not the way a normal atheist thinks. If what you say were correct, then no scientist would ever discover anything new. So your statement kinda obviously contradicts reality in a major way.

However, you might want to look up "Occam's razor".
#33 - mr skeltal (04/08/2013) [+] (2 replies)
I see a post like this and I think to myself, I desire pea soup the I go make pea soup. Cause pea soup is good. I love pea soup.





the end
User avatar #35 to #33 - spikethepony (04/08/2013) [-]
Yes, I must agree that split pea soup is quite desirable. I must also now sob quietly to myself, as I have little access to said soup, and I have no idea how to make it.
#17 - Giganova ONLINE (04/07/2013) [+] (10 replies)
But an explosion from ******* vacuum is normal bcuz scienist say so.
#29 to #17 - mr skeltal (04/08/2013) [-]
Aside from reducing an incredibly complex concept down to ludicrously simple rubbish (Which I'll admit is fine because lets face it, not everyone wants to spend time properly understanding this stuff.) The key difference is that the big bang or whatever you want to call it has millions of scientific hours of research behind it as well as some pretty hefty mathematics. It is what is currently regarded as what MAY have happened based on the information we have.

It has not had the line drawn under it and been labelled 'done' it is a 'heres what we think right now, check back soon.' If you don't 'believe' it then thats fine, feel free to come up with a theory that fits the data better and win several nobel prizes. Not trying to be an asshole, it just annoys me when people mock concepts they clearly havnt spent time trying to understand in the first place.
User avatar #32 - thejellybear (04/08/2013) [-]
Not necessarily the content within, but


OH MY GOD I'VE WAITED MY ENTIRE LIFE FOR A DIAGRAM SUCH AS THIS DIAGRAM.
#19 - mrsugoiman **User deleted account** (04/07/2013) [-]
User avatar #18 - blaaz (04/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
just a thought I had = " since people are not perfect nothing that would originate from them could be perfect either. This would mean that nothing that people create and ect could be perfect either and therefore completely undeniable. This would also be applied literally to everything that we know."

remember this is just a thought
User avatar #6 - iamkagji ONLINE (04/07/2013) [+] (7 replies)
I will now point out everything in this that can be definitively proven as correct. I make no claims that religion is false, but by definition it can't be empirically proven, so I am going to ignore it. You have been warned, so please don't give me any butthurt for this.

Homeopathy can work if done correctly. It just means that you use only natural medicines, not synthetic ones. Shiatsu is just a massage technique, and massage is scientifically proven to be beneficial. Detox is the process of letting your body clean itself out, like if you are a recovering alcoholic or heroin addict. Chiropractic treatment is very helpful, and can be applied to any joint in your body. Cupping, if done properly, increases circulation and releases nutrients. These effects can be easily duplicated with acupuncture and infrared lights. Faith healing, in some rare cases, can actually work due to psychosomatic reactions in the human body.

TL;DR Not trying to start a ********* , but OP is a fag.
#13 to #6 - creativeusernamea (04/07/2013) [-]
Not sure about the other points you made, but homoepathy is absolute pseudo-scientific bollocks. Homeopathy isn't just using natural medicince, it's using natural medicines in such dilute concentrations that there is no medicinal value whatsoever.

As Tim Minchin puts it in Storm "You know what they call alternative medicine that has been proved to work? Medicine."
#4 - mr skeltal (04/07/2013) [+] (4 replies)
you are basically calling everybody in the world but yourself an asshole.

go **** yourself intollerant bastard.

people belive in this stuff. what makes you special?
you think youre actually better than these people?
well id rather go to church with a friend than sit around all day and hear an atheist blabber about how elite and superior their thinking is.

you are **** just like us buddy.
#12 to #4 - powerlevel (04/07/2013) [-]
Your comment is identical to mrfourtysevenman's before he deleted it.
You are a little bitch who can't even take red thumbs.

If you get this offended by religious post uploaded to satire website then i suggest you...
A) Cry about it
B) Tell your Mother
C) Come back to the funny junk when you turn 13.
D) All of the above

#67 - SlowpokeForever (05/13/2013) [+] (1 reply)
User avatar #66 - capnwetnipples (04/21/2013) [-]
i used ear candles once, they were alot better than Q-tips, i didnt even know it was a religious thing
User avatar #58 - DrAlt (04/08/2013) [+] (1 reply)
While I can argue with several of them detox should definitely NOT be on there. That's the process where a junkie is taken off harmful drugs. It's an actual widely accepted scientific practice.
User avatar #56 - mctoilet **User deleted account** (04/08/2013) [-]
Ear Candles?
#52 - Dynex (04/08/2013) [-]
Took me a good 5 mins to understand
Took me a good 5 mins to understand
User avatar #39 - pepemex (04/08/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Yeah cause the mainstream is perfect and never fails. We should never question what our teachers, doctors and TV tell us. If their mistakes kills us that's better than thinking for ourselves, right?
User avatar #50 to #39 - captainfuckitall (04/08/2013) [-]
It's funny because you're using the same logic that created Atheism in the first place
#28 - xatrainx (04/08/2013) [-]
An out-of-body experience is totally a real thing. It just takes a ******** of drugs and the majority of a Friday night.
User avatar #24 - farrett (04/08/2013) [-]
oh god i read angel therapy as anal therapy
User avatar #23 - basicargentinian (04/08/2013) [-]
in which way is psychic surgery not pseudocientific bollocks?
-2
#2 - mrfourtysevenman has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
0
#3 to #2 - mrfourtysevenman has deleted their comment [-]
[ 66 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)