Shingeki no Mexico
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
93 comments displayed.
#58 to #3
-
containlettersonly (09/19/2015) [-] This is fj, that's supposed to be a pic of Bush ain't it?
#5
-
hungwellhamburger (09/18/2015) [-] 
I don't even like Trump, he's a bum. I just want him to win so I can watch Murica burn
#101 to #5
-
anon (09/19/2015) [-]
How about you worry about your own ****** country? I've studied Economics for the past 10 years. I myself have made millions in a **** economy and have ran a business that boasts profits every quarter. Trumps economic plan will make hundreds of thousands of jobs of night.. Sanders will ruin this country and I will flee and take my assets and close my business effectively laying off 14,000 people overnight. I have talked to numerous other people like myself and they have all said the same. You want to see America burn, Vote Sanders because all of the REAL Americans will leave with our businesses.
Have fun getting raped by Amhed.
Have fun getting raped by Amhed.
#16 to #5
-
sanctusdominus ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] we're all in the same boat friend i would even just vote for him then leave once he got in government
#59 to #5
-
containlettersonly (09/19/2015) [-] I would honestly like to see an actual explanation as to why people think Trump would break this country
#85 to #59
-
akkere ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] Maybe not break the country, but he's certainly not going to "make it great again".
First, he doesn't have any experience in political office, but a lot of experience in business. This means more likely than not when he walks into those doors of the White House, he's going to be expecting a lot of people to work for him and not with him, even if that's not how it works. I realize that's a big >implying, but his general attitude in exposing certain issues proves otherwise.
He did an interview where he said how not only would he happily execute Edward Snowden (all while refusing to give any comment on PRISM, The PATRIOT Act, and surveillance) he reassures he'll do this by having Putin simply hand him over because "People like him in Russia, Putin and him would get along well" www.youtube.com/watch?v=ex7d-izDwzw . If the lack of comments on PRISM is any indication, it's likely his stance on the uphold of Second Amendment rights isn't too far from a farse either.
Whether it's legitimate belief or simply pandering, he follows the belief that vaccines and autism are related. politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/28/trump-weighs-in-on-vaccine-autism-controversy/ So either he's a typical politician and likely won't deliver on the extreme stuff he preaches about, or he does absolutely zero research on anything not related to money.
At best, he's a typical politician that's hyped because people think he's different for talking without any kind of filter thanks to him not having to worry about campaign financiers. But people forget he, like any politician, has personal stakes and hidden motives, and that much is easy to see from how he plays a few issues strongly and dodges the rest with banter.
First, he doesn't have any experience in political office, but a lot of experience in business. This means more likely than not when he walks into those doors of the White House, he's going to be expecting a lot of people to work for him and not with him, even if that's not how it works. I realize that's a big >implying, but his general attitude in exposing certain issues proves otherwise.
He did an interview where he said how not only would he happily execute Edward Snowden (all while refusing to give any comment on PRISM, The PATRIOT Act, and surveillance) he reassures he'll do this by having Putin simply hand him over because "People like him in Russia, Putin and him would get along well" www.youtube.com/watch?v=ex7d-izDwzw . If the lack of comments on PRISM is any indication, it's likely his stance on the uphold of Second Amendment rights isn't too far from a farse either.
Whether it's legitimate belief or simply pandering, he follows the belief that vaccines and autism are related. politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/28/trump-weighs-in-on-vaccine-autism-controversy/ So either he's a typical politician and likely won't deliver on the extreme stuff he preaches about, or he does absolutely zero research on anything not related to money.
At best, he's a typical politician that's hyped because people think he's different for talking without any kind of filter thanks to him not having to worry about campaign financiers. But people forget he, like any politician, has personal stakes and hidden motives, and that much is easy to see from how he plays a few issues strongly and dodges the rest with banter.
#112 to #85
-
containlettersonly (09/19/2015) [-] I'm not going to address everything you said, it was well thought out and offered good perspective. I do want to offer a bit of a counterweight though, Obama had close to no political experience, expected people to work with him and with the exception of gun control (which let's be honest he could still do something about unilaterally) I can't think of a single thing he has wanted that he hasn't been able to get by hook or by crook.
Also Trump just released his second policy paper and it's on the 2nd ammendment, as a fan of the 2a I thought it was brilliant, it addressed mental health and harsher penalties for using a gun in the commission of a crime, as well as some other things to balance rights and safety, it's a good read. It's on his website
Also Trump just released his second policy paper and it's on the 2nd ammendment, as a fan of the 2a I thought it was brilliant, it addressed mental health and harsher penalties for using a gun in the commission of a crime, as well as some other things to balance rights and safety, it's a good read. It's on his website
#117 to #112
-
akkere ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] I just want to point out that I don't think any of the other politicians are worth supporting either; Clinton, Sanders, Obama (when he could run, that is), etc.
My main criticism with Trump though is that in a sea of mediocre politicians, people for some reason think he's a gemstone because of a policy that probably wasn't written by him in the first place. I know he came out with his 2nd amendment policy (I brought it up in my previous comment) and it is well thought out. I thought the same thing with illegal immigration as well - I personally support both of those policies, in fact (Illegal immigration especially because I know it's a massive issue that people refuse to acknowledge). But my problem is that a lot of his platform is still underdeveloped, and it shows by how little exposition he gives when he's asked about other issues outside of the ones his detailed policies cover.
Most politicians don't plan their platforms out by themselves anyway, but they at least try to have a good detail to cover for every popular issue out there, and Trump has been able to successfully avoid most of the important issues because everyone's focused on his image rather than his policy (i.e. the debate moderators of the previous GOP debate on CNN focused more on having the politicians go against each other than build up the issues for ratings; senseless bickering; etc.).
Part of the reason Trump gets such a great deal of negative backlash is simply that he gets a great deal of positive upheaval. A lot of people are diehard supporters of him even when there's little known about his platform in detail outside of Illegal Immigration and the recent 2nd Amendment policy he released on his website, and the latter took months to be released.
My main criticism with Trump though is that in a sea of mediocre politicians, people for some reason think he's a gemstone because of a policy that probably wasn't written by him in the first place. I know he came out with his 2nd amendment policy (I brought it up in my previous comment) and it is well thought out. I thought the same thing with illegal immigration as well - I personally support both of those policies, in fact (Illegal immigration especially because I know it's a massive issue that people refuse to acknowledge). But my problem is that a lot of his platform is still underdeveloped, and it shows by how little exposition he gives when he's asked about other issues outside of the ones his detailed policies cover.
Most politicians don't plan their platforms out by themselves anyway, but they at least try to have a good detail to cover for every popular issue out there, and Trump has been able to successfully avoid most of the important issues because everyone's focused on his image rather than his policy (i.e. the debate moderators of the previous GOP debate on CNN focused more on having the politicians go against each other than build up the issues for ratings; senseless bickering; etc.).
Part of the reason Trump gets such a great deal of negative backlash is simply that he gets a great deal of positive upheaval. A lot of people are diehard supporters of him even when there's little known about his platform in detail outside of Illegal Immigration and the recent 2nd Amendment policy he released on his website, and the latter took months to be released.
#115 to #112
-
containlettersonly (09/19/2015) [-] I forgot to mention, if the house and Senate races keep the balance about the same he might be able to get the cucks Boner and mc turtle to do their jobs ( that's if they aren't overthrown in the next senate/house)
#84 to #59
-
anon (09/19/2015) [-]
Basically, whiplash with no supporting structure. (Excuse me for using my own terminology).
In other words he wants instantaneous change with no plans whatsoever.
It's like being a superhero with superspeed and try to carry a person. Trump's approach would be to grab the guy by the hand and blaze off at max speed, breaking the man's neck before he can say "wait". While competent superhero would support the man's head and limbs and accelerate at a monitored and calculated rate.
It's like driving a donkey-powered carriage. Trump wants to triple the speed of the carriage, because they loosing money with the wasted travel time. He starts running the donkey day and night without any breaks. The carriage is now effectively twice as fast. The donkey now looks paler and skinnier. In return, the carriage is effectively slower than before. Trump double the donkey's food. The donkey's speed is improved and back to 1.5 of the original speed. Trump wants 3 times the speed, so he feeds the donkey more. The donkey is now too full and refuses to eat. Trump shoves food down its throat. Donkey chokes on food and dies. Trump looks at the donkey and says "Donkey, you're fired." Trump now declares the carriage broken.
How could the carriage be correctly managed? Instant change: get another donkey, or sell donkey and get horse. "Sure, horse will cost us more, but you can see the return of interest of having the horse would practically pay for itself in 3 years." Gradual change: Monitor the donkey's health. Give it proper supplements and increase the load on it step by step. conduct research to create bionic donkey.
He might have a great plan that noone knows about that he's keeping as surprise, but all evidence indicate complete oblivion to how anything work.
In other words he wants instantaneous change with no plans whatsoever.
It's like being a superhero with superspeed and try to carry a person. Trump's approach would be to grab the guy by the hand and blaze off at max speed, breaking the man's neck before he can say "wait". While competent superhero would support the man's head and limbs and accelerate at a monitored and calculated rate.
It's like driving a donkey-powered carriage. Trump wants to triple the speed of the carriage, because they loosing money with the wasted travel time. He starts running the donkey day and night without any breaks. The carriage is now effectively twice as fast. The donkey now looks paler and skinnier. In return, the carriage is effectively slower than before. Trump double the donkey's food. The donkey's speed is improved and back to 1.5 of the original speed. Trump wants 3 times the speed, so he feeds the donkey more. The donkey is now too full and refuses to eat. Trump shoves food down its throat. Donkey chokes on food and dies. Trump looks at the donkey and says "Donkey, you're fired." Trump now declares the carriage broken.
How could the carriage be correctly managed? Instant change: get another donkey, or sell donkey and get horse. "Sure, horse will cost us more, but you can see the return of interest of having the horse would practically pay for itself in 3 years." Gradual change: Monitor the donkey's health. Give it proper supplements and increase the load on it step by step. conduct research to create bionic donkey.
He might have a great plan that noone knows about that he's keeping as surprise, but all evidence indicate complete oblivion to how anything work.
#102 to #84
-
anon (09/19/2015) [-]
Oh wow... You're a ******* retard. You obviously have not read Trumps Economic plan, I have, I have also read SANDERS Plan and it will cost over 17 T to start all these magic fairy tail utopia hippy ******** .
Sanders hides his money with his wife overseas, hes also a Socialist and Socialism will not be elected, I would bet my entire hedge fund right now on it.
Trump also wants to tax every single company sending JOBS overseas and not opening plants here in the USA. The tax, A base 35% on EVERYTHING Will effectively assassinate them from the American Market or they will be forced to BUILD AND MAKE HERE CREATING MILLIONS OF JOBS OVERNIGHT.
Forcing Ford, Chevy, Coke, All of them to build plants HERE, creating jobs and money into our economy overnight, the construction crews building the plants get money, the people working there get money ta da more money in our pockets.
Sanders hides his money with his wife overseas, hes also a Socialist and Socialism will not be elected, I would bet my entire hedge fund right now on it.
Trump also wants to tax every single company sending JOBS overseas and not opening plants here in the USA. The tax, A base 35% on EVERYTHING Will effectively assassinate them from the American Market or they will be forced to BUILD AND MAKE HERE CREATING MILLIONS OF JOBS OVERNIGHT.
Forcing Ford, Chevy, Coke, All of them to build plants HERE, creating jobs and money into our economy overnight, the construction crews building the plants get money, the people working there get money ta da more money in our pockets.
#126 to #102
-
anon (09/19/2015) [-]
Again, the question was why people think he'll break America. Also, I never mentioned anything about Sanders.
You raise a valid point, but can you provide link to his plan? Now, I still wouldn't call that a plan. You know that the president's power is extremely limited by design. Being a president doesn't give magical power of "become for > have ordained" Don't they need to pass a law or something (pass house or Congress) to raise taxes? He's almost got no support to pass laws.
That tax raise imposed is exactly what Republicans are against. Running as a Republican and then advocating a democratic agenda means Trump really doesn't know anything about politics.
You raise a valid point, but can you provide link to his plan? Now, I still wouldn't call that a plan. You know that the president's power is extremely limited by design. Being a president doesn't give magical power of "become for > have ordained" Don't they need to pass a law or something (pass house or Congress) to raise taxes? He's almost got no support to pass laws.
That tax raise imposed is exactly what Republicans are against. Running as a Republican and then advocating a democratic agenda means Trump really doesn't know anything about politics.
#68 to #5
-
rumpelstilzchen ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] I'd agree, but the problem is that this would have global effects
#71 to #5
-
peanutbitter (09/19/2015) [-] You're right because we vote for a supreme dictator who makes all the decisions
#8 to #5
-
unclelunchbox (09/18/2015) [-] Try living here, its not so funny knowing this guy could be elected and ruin all relationships with foreign countries
#54 to #5
-
theplanetearth (09/19/2015) [-] From where? Europe? Good luck with Jamal and his friends, bet you wish you could've built a Mediterranean wall huh?
#65 to #5
-
keatontheghostfox (09/19/2015) [-] I don't even like Syrians, they are bums. But I want them to take over Europe just to watch yuropuur burn.
#100
-
daemonico (09/19/2015) [-] I'm mexican and I find this content offensive.
BUT what I cannot find are my sides.
BUT what I cannot find are my sides.
#49
-
blueninja (09/19/2015) [-] not bad i guess was a little disappointed when i didn't see a titan with a sombrero
#13
-
norwegiansnowman ONLINE (09/18/2015) [-] mfw trumps possible presidency
inb4 americas thumb this down to oblivion
inb4 americas thumb this down to oblivion
#38 to #13
-
PgFalcon ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] I think that most americans are just pissed that 99% of the politicians in the race will not do the will of the people, and Trump will. We're pissed off about nothing being done about all these issues, not the least of which is our unsecured boarder with mexico.
We hate drugs and crime and stupid people. We love guns. We want to shoot drugs and crime and stupid people with said guns. Trump embodies this national angst and displeasure with our current and prospective politicians.
We hate drugs and crime and stupid people. We love guns. We want to shoot drugs and crime and stupid people with said guns. Trump embodies this national angst and displeasure with our current and prospective politicians.
#119 to #38
-
cubose (09/19/2015) [-]
And also to add to the fence thing. Some of the many problems with that are that it is just too expensive to do and in a lot of areas the fence will interfere with wildlife and migratory paths, Indian tribes have rights claimed to some of the land they want to build it on which would just be a ******** if they started messing with them, and it is the wrong message to send for a country founded on the success from immigrants. Not to mention a large majority of the illegals make their way through "vacations", and straight through the border crossing and not over the physical fence. It is all over a bad idea and once again something so unimportant from actual real problems america is facing. But you know how it is, 'Murica. There are a lot of ignorant voters and ignorant politicians and trump is one
#116 to #38
-
cubose (09/19/2015) [-]
The problem with this though is that people do not understand the full repercussions of their decisions and that is why we need a competent president who won't do always what the people want, but will do what is best. You can't please everyone with every single decision. And another problem is these are all surface issues and I can assure you their are wwaaaayy more important subjects rather than drugs, crime, and guns but this is just what people mainly see. Trump has yet to give any relevant information towards how he is going to run office and the most important, intricate details that go into the main works of a properly functioning country, and he just stands too ignorant to be taken seriously by anyone but the average surface level american.
#40 to #17
-
anon (09/19/2015) [-]
All these accusation of "he's stupid" please elaborate for me, how is he stupid? where is proof that he's stupid? his billions of dollars he earned himself? he take no **** and give all **** back attitude? that's stupid? the man could run mental circles around you I bet. I'm not supporting him, but baseless character attacks are completely retarded. The same **** was said about Reagan, and he was a very very smart man as he proved in his land slide victories and successful presidency.
#107 to #40
-
therwasno (09/19/2015) [-]
the whole american politicians are and always have been a joke since many years... american politics is pure comedy, Kasperle theater so retarded that it hurts..its like in every other country too, just handpuppets for big lobbyists
look at Bush, look at Obama, look a Trump, look at Clinton, they are comedians, entertainer really dumb uneducated people or real good actors nothing more. Reagan too... JFK was probably a real president ,but killed .speaks for hisself
look at Bush, look at Obama, look a Trump, look at Clinton, they are comedians, entertainer really dumb uneducated people or real good actors nothing more. Reagan too... JFK was probably a real president ,but killed .speaks for hisself
#69 to #13
-
chikibriki ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] personally i'd prefer him as president over clinton. he got to where he is by being good with money and knows hows to budget. he actually has a decent chance of pulling this country out of the trilllions of dollars of debt
while i don't agree with him on some issues (we don't need a giant walll around the us-mexico border) i do agree with him on a lot of others
while i don't agree with him on some issues (we don't need a giant walll around the us-mexico border) i do agree with him on a lot of others
#70 to #69
-
thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] He hasn't really spoken much about his economic plans, so I don't know why people keep bringing this up.
I personally will not vote for someone who is anti-gun, believes vaccines cause autism, and wants to build a wall between Mexico and the U.S.
I personally will not vote for someone who is anti-gun, believes vaccines cause autism, and wants to build a wall between Mexico and the U.S.
#80 to #78
-
thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] When he "ran" in 2012 he supported a ban on "assault weapons" including Title II NFA firearms.
For me it's all or nothing.
For me it's all or nothing.
#83 to #82
-
thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] I don't have a source specifically no, I just remember that from that election period.
Here are recent articles though:
www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/donald-trump-believe-candidate-stands-10-issues/
www.businessinsider.com/2016-candidates-gun-control-stances-2015-6
It's hard to say if he actually changed at all. Sure he may still support the general gist of the 2nd amendment, but without him really coming out and saying "Assault Weapons / full autos / **** regulated by the ATF is ok with me" I'd rather just move on to another candidate.
Here are recent articles though:
www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/donald-trump-believe-candidate-stands-10-issues/
www.businessinsider.com/2016-candidates-gun-control-stances-2015-6
It's hard to say if he actually changed at all. Sure he may still support the general gist of the 2nd amendment, but without him really coming out and saying "Assault Weapons / full autos / **** regulated by the ATF is ok with me" I'd rather just move on to another candidate.
#92 to #83
-
valintina ONLINE (09/19/2015) [-] Both sources specifically say that he supported the ban on Assault Weapons in his book that was published in 2000. 15 years ago. Because now more information about the right to keep and bear arms is out, especially the 2004 FBI report released about the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban being a joke of a bill that did not effect crime, we have concrete proof that can change perspectives. Whose to say Donald didn't change his perspective on guns over the past 15 years?
However, to really put those fears of the Don being anti-second amendment away, he needs Cruz (Who has a long history of having a hardon against the ATF and against AWBs). A Trump/Cruz ticket will really solidify the Second Amendment voters. There's even rumors that Cruz is seeking a VP spot with Trump should him being a presidential candidate not work out.
However, to really put those fears of the Don being anti-second amendment away, he needs Cruz (Who has a long history of having a hardon against the ATF and against AWBs). A Trump/Cruz ticket will really solidify the Second Amendment voters. There's even rumors that Cruz is seeking a VP spot with Trump should him being a presidential candidate not work out.
#91 to #83
-
durkadurka (09/19/2015) [-] This is his official position:
www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/second-amendment-rights
Take it for whatever it's worth.
www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/second-amendment-rights
Take it for whatever it's worth.
#87
-
blademontane (09/19/2015) [-] yfw all these Trump memes are created by Trumps personal meme army.
#11
-
tanstin (09/18/2015) [-] I've learned that funnyjunk hates trump, I cant really see why, because all I get when I ask is that hes too loud, and hes stupid.
#36 to #14
-
insanemanoo (09/19/2015) [-] I don't get why people are saying he has no policy. His policy is re-invigorating the economy by putting a death grip on illegal immigration which is a economic drain for America. Yet, he's called a racist for it....He doesn't want to stifle immigration as a whole, only strengthen defense against illegal immigration. Since when is it racist to to enforce laws?
#42 to #41
-
insanemanoo (09/19/2015) [-] There isn't an outline because he doesn't really need to do anything to achieve this. Illegal immigration laws are already in place and we've just been more or less not enforcing them for the past couples of decades. His policy is outlined simply as enforcing these long standing laws more effectively through increased funding to border patrols and the like; which will be paid for by the additional taxes brought in from the jobs that are created as the illegal immigrants are removed. Its a problem in which the solution is literally self-funding. Not to mention that in the long term this could lead to the shrinking or even outright abolition of our completely ****** and abused Welfare system.
#76 to #50
-
insanemanoo (09/19/2015) [-] You didn't ask me for my understanding of politics and the economy, you asked me for Trump's policy that he's standing behind and that's it. Furthermore, last time I checked, our country's biggest problem is the $18 trillion in debt that we are, so I'd rather start fixing the problem rather than just throwing more money at useless government programs such as Welfare.
#45 to #42
-
nottheoatmeal (09/19/2015) [-] you must be really stupid if you think "the additional taxes brought in from the jobs that are created as the illegal immigrants are removed" are going to pay for a reinforce or the border patrol. Every penny gathered in new taxes will be spent in the military, giving aids to Israel (?) or funding the big companies the way the government has being doing since the 80's.
#129 to #45
-
insanemanoo (09/21/2015) [-] Are you kidding me? You're telling me that you believe a man who has managed to multiply his family fortune twenty-fold in his lifetime could worsen the economy? He's clearly the most qualified candidate from a purely economic perspective.
#131 to #129
-
nottheoatmeal (09/22/2015) [-] He is going to make himself even wealthier, not you or your family.
#132 to #131
-
insanemanoo (09/22/2015) [-] A healthier economy benefits every American, no matter who causes it.
#133 to #132
-
nottheoatmeal (09/22/2015) [-] You won't get **** pal. The rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer. Anyways, Trump will never get to the majors, Jeb Bush will.
#134 to #133
-
insanemanoo (09/22/2015) [-] Maybe, but its better than Sanders or Clinton platforms of just handing more power to the federal government....and Jeb Bush is actually falling behind massively. He's not taking campaigning too seriously. Right now, its looking like Carly Fiorina or Ben Carson are going to emerge from the pack once Trump's bubble bursts.
#86 to #14
-
durkadurka (09/19/2015) [-] He's been slowly creating official policy outlines.
www.donaldjtrump.com/positions
www.donaldjtrump.com/positions
#12 to #11
-
innocentbabies (09/18/2015) [-]
When did that become an invalid reason to not want somebody in office?
#53
-
KievLeviathan (09/19/2015) [-]
The ONLY thing I regret is that non-Americans can't vote for Trump to run their country as well. It seems unfair.
