I don´t think HE did. Funnyjunkers proposed that idea and I am not sure if he even responded to it. You know that the rights to play a movie somewhere aren´t free, right?
he said he'd consider it and obviously rights to play a movie somewhere aren't free, but it's a lot easier when you aren't actually selling the content. If you display it, you're pretty okay with it. The biggest problem with copyrights would be newer movies. Older movies don't always have renewed copyrights in fact most of them don't seeing as after a few decades copyrights expire and the producers probably won't pay to renew it if the movie's income is currently scarce. Besides, if you bought a movie and had a movie night at your home and invited friends you wouldn't be fined for showing the movie to people who didn't purchase it. A way for DJ 4DM1N to avoid more copyright problems is making the screening only available live so there would be no lingered stealing of the display.
In my country the copyrights are kept even for 70 years after the artist dies. Also I see your point with home-showing, but isn´t that on like every DVD/Blue-Ray/whatever? (Only for home blah blah, not public blah blah)
You are correct about the fact that copyrights can be kept for 70 years, although some production companies may just not care to fine or press charges against someone who invades the copyrights. Also, there are movie nights during summer camps nationally who probably don't have rights to the movies and nothing is said to them. Sometimes disclaiming and publicly announcing the copyrights or giving credit to the artist also prevents any trouble with copyrights. Personally, I think copyrights are a joke to everyone but the millionaire/billionaires who complain that they don't make trillions of dollars annually.