Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#5 - aesgard (09/08/2013) [-]
User avatar #38 to #5 - walkerjam (09/08/2013) [-]
I wouldn't call something posted in 2012 vintage in any way. Not even by internet standards.
That said, I do realize that it's a joke and all that, making my point rather irrelevant, I just wanted to point it out anyway.
 Friends (0)