Upload
Login or register
x

SJW's get sent to Cambodia for the lulz

HI am not a US Citizen, I am a free inhabitant of the earth"
HOLY **** , ******* TUMBLR WETBACK& Reminds the / s whe get departed Cambodia at the bedder a while bec k during my watc h. Its funny because they were tmm Mexico and were baught the US at a young age and nearer get their
citizenship er green card ****
tut me at border california
Dooing routine checks and what not
Peeople following rules and laws no problem what sewer
Cratch seme illegal beaners all the time
comes this Fiat with seme Hipster beaner guys and girl
they can fit in there? Skinny as hell though
there
your papers er passport?
No but we' re citizens and we' re pleading the tth"
Hetare at them disbelief and outright anger
You heard us so please let us be en airway we can' t touch us because under article-"
MEET THE **** OUT OF THE VEHICLE
panic mode for them screaming seme ******** clause about they have the right to travel between countries freely because they' re not tied to seme quasi NAFTA conspiracy of the North Americ an union er seme **** like that
them and can' t seem to find any information en them
refuse to talk
Milk sure fine
Iswift paper work and send them to detention center
Sstill refuse to talk
guy from homeland security interviews them
their life stories
laut they have no paper work. Nothing whatsoever not mien finger prints er dental rec ards
Well **** pick a country and deport them to it"
Why not Mexico?"
Too easy they' ll just cemo right back"
OOHH I GOTA GOOD ONE, Cambodia
Sshole team laughs and says done
paperwork
it weeks later they' re deported to Cambodia
We can deport people anywhere we want if they have no paper work and we' re not able to "determine" their country of origin.
They were cens piracy insane they didn' t even dial their family fer help while in em detention center.
family probably illegals
...
+1605
Views: 65330
Favorited: 201
Submitted: 08/10/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to isolovegames Subscribe to 4chan

Comments(460):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
1234>
[ 460 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
226 comments displayed.
Reply
+901
#6 - ldnelson (08/10/2015) [+] (27 replies)
stickied by isolovegames
Locals' faces when
Reply
+175
#1 - isolovegames [OP](08/10/2015) [+] (5 replies)
stickied by isolovegames
Mention list : Hightechlowlife, akulakhan, echotheambient, lorddarkskull, ironarm. Wolfwithglasses, murpmurp, geofalke, alarubra, snowplows, nibblebrsingr, herpderpaids, cptcanada, yankeerose, crimsonsplash, karmanp, stalkerexplain, kommisarkhrushchev, maybehuman, orissolpt, atheisttsiahta, mikasuh, frankjeager, cookiecoketwo, oxidous, vorarephilia, revel, Captainkill, mrsexmuffins, zomaru, anonibusii, eatinyojello, megaflak, ledd, Shadow Guardian, *********** , lolercoasters, jazzoman, dargent, gotthembarrels, darkparadox, jcenderion, mrjweezy, whichever, randomwanker, juffs, hiago, dingdongpancakes, innocentbabaies, optimogappi, obliviscor, megaguy x, anonymousemoose, synthane, mikethemerciless, karenoniks, theshifter, younganddefenseles, boomitsassy, gangbangtime, ravepen, blahred, penisisawsome, chickenandwaffle, wildberk, zombiejew, nooblyz, DoktorHax, theflyingdick, dickchupacabra, stokey, notorc, nlglet, lickinggecko, anonymous, nuclearcomedy, anonassassin, awcskin, odstnsg, afrodemon, romagnum, anarchyamongants, vladimirtepes, hendriktal, razerlight, kugis, adzoh, khally, nazguultje, nitricmike, nighthawxx, maybelline, spoperman, berengar, plokix, therealgambit, nigeltheoutlaw, bluslenderman, thepinkestofthepie, pyroteknyx, scopepp, finalfantasymaster, inhumanpotato, lubricatedtaco, abeemenation, agnaraed, anonibusii, comradecommissar, arott, include, hetzerdk, pineapplechunkss, frug, chaoticlaw, sspacecore, ****************** , mechanicexplain, ************* , theshinymagikarp, xelagnik, JoshOwnsAll, llamaracer, kaldarvonlupo, chuchiereaper, gamaroth, dellexe, edgecutter, abnormalgames, icameheretotroll, maybehuman, loganmadder, iphraem, rollmeanddie, stickmanz, scarredwolf, magicka, exarzero, skullington, streamdream, highkingtorygg, anarchyamongants, nibblebrsingr, muffindemon Thumb up if you would like to be put on the wall of mentions for more content.
Reply
+217
#3 - mattdoggy (08/10/2015) [-]
Cambodia
I would have picked some back water African Country but Cambodia is a great pick
Reply
+11
User avatar #176 to #3 - becauseoprahsaidso (08/11/2015) [-]
I thought Cambodia was in Africa for a second
Reply
+3
User avatar #358 to #3 - pinecest (08/11/2015) [-]
I honestly would've picked North Korea.
Reply
+166
#57 - creepydudewatching (08/11/2015) [-]
>When people refuse to hand over simple paperwork because IKNOWMYRIGHTS.iso

guy refuses to show his ticket to operator. He must be such a wonderful person IRL.

Skip to about 4:00 in to see his face. It's really punchable.
Reply
+4
#208 to #57 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
Soldados de Guatemala golpean a niños brutalmente i put this here once and ill put it again, this guys run away from a check and they pick up a bad day to do it. Collaborate with the authorities and you can have a pacific incident.

Full story: this supposed teens, in the end they werent, robed a lady and her son, they found the soldiers and told them what happend. The soldiers found them sitting somewhere and when the soldiers call them for a check they run away. after the chase the soldiers had enough from them and this happend. Apparently they alredy have criminal records and where well know robers in the area.

what do you think?
Reply
+1
#359 to #208 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
Yeah, they should get their ASSES kicked, meaning literally asses or sth like that. Going for internal organs while jump kicking after the guy started vomiting from hits to the stomach is ******* CONCIOUS attempt at killing those dudes. Few kicks more and internal bleeding from ruptured organs and broken ribs will kill them for sure. Those guys, like sadly many soldiers are sadists. This is sadistic behaviour. Iv'e seen it: uniform often makes you a sadist, after awhile many of them loose a grip on reality when it comes to brutal behaviour. Those soldies (at least some of them) deserve the same done to them.

Again: yeah, those kiddos deserved to have their asscheeks kicked into a pulp. But this? This is sick.
Reply
+11
#285 to #57 - thiscannotbeunseen (08/11/2015) [-]
i don't believe i've ever had to facepalm at a video or picture, this itself, this displays how stupid people actually get.

it burns.
Reply
+7
User avatar #175 to #57 - shieeetposter ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
If I were to search for videos like this on YouTube, what do I put in the search tab? Cringe comp?
Reply
+6
#355 to #175 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
sovereign citizen
Reply
+2
User avatar #419 to #175 - burtman (08/11/2015) [-]
I know its reddit, but it does come in handy. www.reddit.com/r/amibeingdetained
Reply
+9
User avatar #100 to #57 - asotil (08/11/2015) [-]
Honestly I would've just asked if the officer and ticket guy could turn off their cameras so I can punch him in his ******* lesbian mouth and throw him off the ******* train. Seriously it's showing your ******* ticket, not a TSA agent grabbing your dick
Reply
+9
User avatar #171 to #57 - volcanicdiarrhea (08/11/2015) [-]
Ah, yes, this ****** .
The guy who thinks that the right to travel freely means you can use paid transportation without having to follow any rules.
I bet this ****** also refuses to pay interstate tolls, claiming that it infringes on his "right to travel freely"
Reply
+1
#302 to #171 - skebaba (08/11/2015) [-]
Well, it kinda does, if there is no other way to cross state borders.
Reply
+6
#351 to #302 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
You can walk, swim, etc. Crossing is free. The roads aren't. You pay to use the road, not to cross. It's not that hard to understand.
Reply
+1
User avatar #388 to #302 - trolljunkusa (08/11/2015) [-]
Driving is a privilege not a right.

Under that same logic I should be able to go to the bar and drink 50 beers and drive home and not be arrested because if I were to get arrested that would infringe on "my right to travel freely"


Not trying to be an asshole, just trying to make a point
Reply
+41
#76 to #57 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
Too bad the douchebag doesn't understand, his right to travel freely means he can walk from Cali to Florida if he wants, not that he can illegally travel on public transport.
Reply
+1
User avatar #435 to #57 - nyrian (08/12/2015) [-]
I had to stop that **** for a second not to snap my neck while cringing
Reply
+22
User avatar #73 to #57 - Silverboss (08/11/2015) [-]
Holy **** , I lost it when he starts saying that these cops are wasting their time with him when "they could be out there saving a life". If he wasn't being such a damn twat, they wouldn't be wasting their time with him in the first place

goddamn, trying so hard not to punch my screen.
Reply
+41
#97 to #57 - thunderpony (08/11/2015) [-]
My reaction if I was on that bus
Reply
+25
User avatar #132 to #57 - crimsongungnir (08/11/2015) [-]
One of most damning pieces of evidence that this guy is an asshole: he's filming vertically.
But no **** this faggot.
I think this guy should definitely ride the train. Hell, put him on the front of the train. On the outside. Hit him with the train.
Reply
+30
User avatar #64 to #57 - maffi (08/11/2015) [-]
I bet all his life the ladies turned him down for being ugly as **** so he tried his luck with men, but was still turned down.
Reply
+34
#135 to #57 - grimsho (08/11/2015) [-]
"b-but the constitution"
While being yelled at by everyone on the train.

Sometimes I mistakenly think that these types of people don't exist outside of internet Strawman arguments, and although it's hilarious to see reality slap them in the face while being recorded, it's really saddening to realise that they do exist.

And holy **** that smug ass retarded face. Turning that camera toward his face every time he thinks he's making a good point.
Reply
+33
#150 to #57 - thechosentroll (08/11/2015) [-]
How do people like these survive? How do you even breathe with your head shoved so far up your own ass?
How do people like these survive? How do you even breathe with your head shoved so far up your own ass?
Reply
+43
#67 to #57 - cookingcookiez (08/11/2015) [-]
>face throughout whole video
Reply
+3
User avatar #345 to #57 - confusedasian (08/11/2015) [-]
That ending though.


******* faggot ass hippie.
Reply
+2
User avatar #368 to #57 - segwaynazi (08/11/2015) [-]
Dude i would beat the **** out of this guy ******* ginger piece of **** , he deserves to be beaten..... Damn ugly **** .....
Reply
+20
#209 to #57 - megayoming (08/11/2015) [-]
This just stroked me the wrong way, like watching your mom try and navigate a computer, or a twelve year old telling you hes a hacker.
Reply
+1
User avatar #350 to #57 - onemoreminute (08/11/2015) [-]
i love the end to this video.
Reply
+18
User avatar #70 to #57 - shunkahawolf ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
how do you know if im a youth or not?
maybe because you look like a 28 year old ******* virgin?
Reply
+1
#374 to #70 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
Gay virgin
Reply
+10
User avatar #139 to #57 - AnomynousUser (08/11/2015) [-]
Holy **** , after 15 minutes, that end was amazing. He didn't even have enough to pay for a $2 train ride!
Reply
+36
#60 to #57 - isolovegames [OP](08/11/2015) [-]
The only time I would ever do this is if police / ATF were at my house.
>"May we come in?"
Do you have a physical copy of the warrant needed?
>"..."
Good day and good bye sir. If you would like to come in bring the warrant.
>Proceed to bury all my funs in the back yard... just in case.
But again- if I get pulled over it's going to be hands on the steering wheel and "yes sir" and "no sir" and "have a nice day officer." because I'm %100 comfortable with police but not at / in my house- irrational phobia I guess.
Reply
+29
User avatar #99 to #60 - asotil (08/11/2015) [-]
This
******* this

If people understood this there would be no ******* circlejerk of "Cops are always infallible" or "Cops are the devil"

If you get pulled over, hands on the wheel. Do not move. Legally they cannot search your car without your permission or unless you make a motion of assault on the officer. If you keep your hands on the wheel, they cannot search your vehicle. They need to get a warrant otherwise. So if an officer just says "We're going to search your car, step out" first ask if he has a warrant and to see it. If he says he doesn't need one/doesn't need to show you, tell him to get ****** and lock your doors, then start recording

If cops are at your house, immediately ask for a warrant if they say "Can we come in?' or "We're coming in". If they refuse to show a warrant, lock windows and doors and call police who know what they're doing, and inform them of the situation. If they try to break in without one, in 39 States it's Self Defense for you to knock them the **** out, since they are on the wrong side of the law
Reply
+2
User avatar #179 to #99 - YllekNayr (08/11/2015) [-]
what uh......is the point of keeping him from searching your vehicle?

I mean, implying this actually works, what do you gain from that?
Reply
+5
#284 to #179 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
If you giver permission.

Lets say its raining and he drops your laptop in a puddle

You consented. All damage is at your expense and he is not held liable

Also dirty cops planting weed on you
Reply
+7
User avatar #183 to #179 - masterjogi (08/11/2015) [-]
You don't get arrested for the dead hooker in your trunk.
Reply
+1
User avatar #184 to #183 - YllekNayr (08/11/2015) [-]
If you have a dead hooker in your trunk you SHOULD be arrested.

That's kinda my point.
Reply
+7
User avatar #186 to #184 - masterjogi (08/11/2015) [-]
Lets say you have a huge collection of Dragon Dildos in your Trunk and you live in a small town and everyone will know in 2 days. Sure they are legal, but they are embarrassing as **** . Privacy is our most important right.
Reply
0
User avatar #187 to #186 - YllekNayr (08/11/2015) [-]
Why would you being carrying that around?

Why would a cop care?

What are the odds of you being pulled over when you're moving your dildo collection?

Like, reasonably speaking, I can't imagine this being necessary 99% of the time. I only see it causing unnecessary problems for almost every occasion.
Reply
+5
User avatar #188 to #187 - masterjogi (08/11/2015) [-]
I guess people cary embarrassing stuff waaaay more often than dead hookers. Therefore it's far more likely getting pulled over with your dildo collection than with something illegal.

Also, cops still are human, they talk to their friends about stuff like that, maybe one of them even knows you.
Reply
+1
User avatar #189 to #188 - masterjogi (08/11/2015) [-]
It's the drivers choice if he wants to allow them to search him, thats how it should be. But you are right, people should stop being uncooperative.
Reply
-3
User avatar #191 to #188 - YllekNayr (08/11/2015) [-]
"I guess people cary embarrassing stuff waaaay more often than dead hookers. Therefore it's far more likely getting pulled over with your dildo collection than with something illegal."

Non-sequitur.
Implying that dead hookers are the only illegal thing you might be caught with.
Guns and drugs are far more likely to be found in a car than dead hookers OR a dragon dildo collection.
Additionally, what are the odds that saying that to a cop is going to make him say "oh, well alrighty then" rather than "you're under arrest"?
Reply
+3
User avatar #192 to #191 - masterjogi (08/11/2015) [-]
You can't arrest someone with no evidence/reason, he didn't let me search my car is not a valid reason for arrest, attacking an officer is, thats why op recommended keeping your hands on the wheel.
Reply
-5
User avatar #194 to #192 - YllekNayr (08/11/2015) [-]
Obstructing an officer is reason for arrest, if he's actually within his right to ask to search your car.

I do believe that you don't need a warrant to search someone's car if you have reasonable suspicion.

I've heard cops give that reason many times before.
Reply
+1
#352 to #194 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
I'll give you some legitimate reason since you seem to think that one of your rights as an American don't matter. When the cops search your **** they could find illegal **** that isn't yours and you get arrested for it or they search your **** and break your **** . Say you have a laptop or something else valuable and fragile then the cop(s) toss it on the floor while looking through your other **** . You allowed them to search your **** and therefore any damage to your **** is your own fault. You can't sue to demand payment because you allowed them to search your **** .
Reply
0
User avatar #296 to #191 - adrilazzaro (08/11/2015) [-]
god you just love that authority dick up your ass dont you
Reply
+1
User avatar #386 to #296 - YllekNayr (08/11/2015) [-]
good argument man
teach me how to be like you
Reply
+1
User avatar #61 to #60 - creepydudewatching (08/11/2015) [-]
I agree completely; if the police are trying to gain unlawful access to your home, you should have every right to tell them to go get a warrant. God knows I saw there was a cop in Florida who entered a man's home without a warrant and was shot. The man who shot him was acquitted because it was his right to defend his home.

When the police pull me over I just try to be polite, because I don't know what kinda asshole they had before me, but I ain't getting his backlash because I wanna defend my rights.
As long as they don't hit me, insult me, or damage my property I couldn't care less what they do; they wanna see ID but I legally don't have to provide it? I'll just provide it because it makes his job quicker and I can go sooner.
Reply
+1
User avatar #217 to #60 - TheBigGummyBear ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
Irrational phobia or not bro, your reason is valid.

Police / ATF actually do need a warrant and need to show it to the legal property owner if they want to enter the premises without their permission.

This ranga ******** says showing proof of payment is molestation because it requires you to reach into your own pocket and show the cop something that's in our possession.

What the **** has the world come to where these cunts are allowed to live? Society's gotten a little soft now that suing has become so abundant I reckon, now cops are afraid to actually do their job, such as physically pull this guy off the train to stop delaying the train, incase he gets hurt like the shrimpy scrawny cunt he is and tries to sue them.

What you said is correct by the law, this ranga twat is just a braindead cancer on the world's collective consciousness and isn't worthy of the life or privileges he's been given.
Reply
+9
User avatar #147 to #57 - braxtotxarb (08/11/2015) [-]
This should be posted in a Cringe Comp
Reply
+1
User avatar #376 to #147 - hiukuss (08/11/2015) [-]
it was
Reply
+16
#173 to #57 - shieeetposter ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
>travel denied
>TWICE
Reply
+15
User avatar #214 to #57 - TheBigGummyBear ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
I am so ******* sick of these cunts trying to find loopholes in the law and trying to manipulate the system because they think they're so ******* smart.

If the loopholes were so easy to find that you could be a normal citizen and just travel on a train for FREE when everyone else has to pay, I'm pretty sure they would've fixed that **** by now. All these ******* do is cause trouble and try to make some kind of stand against authorities when really they're just causing a scene and wasting everyone's time making life more difficult for everyone else involved.

I feel like this whole predicament began a few years ago when that video about saying "I don't consent to searches" means a cop who pulled you over no longer has jurisdiction to search your vehicle unless they can vividly see something illegal from standing outside your car window. I know that this **** started it all, someone made a video about how to manipulate the system and it got a lot of hits, now all the mouthbreathers who have nothing better to do with their life go out looking to annoy people and make the authorities look like fools.

I'm glad this isn't happening in Australia, we don't have all these articles, amendments, bill of rights etc. to quote. In my country if you sit on a train and haven't paid for a ticket, they will give you a fine right then and there. If you tried to give the speech this ****** gave in this here video, the cop will probably physically grab you and throw you off at the next station then deal with you then and there.

I'm not very well informed about how things work over in the US but I think your cops/authorities are a little too soft and scared of being sued. If this cunt tried to pull this **** on the train that I catch (good old QR, Cleveland line) then he'd get thrown the **** off with a $220 fine.

I think there needs to be a new universal rule where if someone resists providing required information (ie showing your ******* train ticket) then they have police officer or what have you has the right to physically grab them and throw them the **** off the train. Assuming they already don't have that right? But this cop in the video was a little too soft I think, and he tried reasoning with someone who is clearly incapable of listening and was set in their own ways.

Reply
+1
User avatar #271 to #214 - bluboyrulez (08/11/2015) [-]
Thats how **** used to be in America, but everything changed over time.
Reply
+14
#168 to #57 - durkadurka ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
I really need to know if this guy got arrested.

The autism has never been stronger. How do you not get how the 4th amendment works?
Reply
+4
User avatar #180 to #168 - shieeetposter ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
I found his channel. Mangagaman. Not sure, but I genuinely believe this guy has autism. Find his burger king video.
Reply
+6
#281 to #180 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
he isn't autistic, he is a snarky narcissistic cunt, that's what he is.
Reply
+7
#146 to #57 - yisumad (08/11/2015) [-]
15:34 Sounded like Ray.
Just thought I'd mention that.
Reply
+15
#156 to #57 - spatulaman (08/11/2015) [-]
Good lord he's like a broken record.
Thank god the other people are decent human beings and not having any of his **** .
"Why would I need it? I'm gay. Oh god the punchability is High
"I'm inciting a riot! That's New. We're reaching Punchability levels never before seen by mankind.
Reply
+5
User avatar #170 to #57 - synxiz (08/11/2015) [-]
i want to find him, punch him in the face and yell "GET OFF THE TRAIN"
Reply
+13
#295 to #57 - starllow (08/11/2015) [-]
>I'm going to excersise my right to remain silent
>Never shuts up

Reply
+3
#431 to #382 - jarelk ONLINE (08/12/2015) [-]
"Body type: fit"
Reply
+2
User avatar #428 to #382 - grimsho (08/12/2015) [-]
"I'm a rather... avid fan of 'big boy words'."
That ****** pure gold after watching this video. What a complete jack-off.
A textbook example of someone who thinks they're so smart and above everybody else and worth everyone's time when they're really just an annoying douchebag to anyone who comes near them.
Reply
+1
User avatar #429 to #428 - grimsho (08/12/2015) [-]
Looks like I posted that too soon because he spells "liars", "discrimination", and more wrong just one paragraph later.
Reply
+1
#455 to #382 - tarabostes (08/23/2015) [-]
"I'm putting what I don't like and a few antihistamines of my ideals"
''...the Bible"
Why am i not surprised?
Also Heard you were talkin' ****
Reply
+23
#68 to #57 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
>I'm Gay why would I need it
My god, he's so ******* obnoxious.
Reply
+44
User avatar #75 to #68 - shunkahawolf ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
hes not gay hes a ******* faggot.
Reply
+2
User avatar #385 to #57 - maybetraffy (08/11/2015) [-]
holly **** ... I skipped to see his face, he looks like a seagull who has a plastic bag covered in algae on his head.

some qt Asian girls on train too, nice
Reply
+12
User avatar #63 to #57 - sugoi (08/11/2015) [-]
"revoking my right to travel unmolested"
Did the definition of revoke change or am I misunderstanding something?
Said it at around 5:10, maybe a tad earlier.
Reply
+7
User avatar #65 to #63 - creepydudewatching (08/11/2015) [-]
I thought the exact same thing. If I was the ticket inspector and he said that I'd be all like "Sorry sir, you invoked your right"
"Yeah, but I didn't mean--"
"Invoked your right, sir. Ticket.
"But--"
"INVOKED YOUR ******* RIGHT"
Reply
+1
#356 to #63 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
I'm not defending him, I'm just saying I heard invoke. On that note by paying for and using the ticket you agree to the terms of the service, which one the stickers pointed out on the video is to prove you have paid if asked by an employee.

>>#65 invoke means to cite or state something and revoke is to invalidate or cancel.
Reply
+1
User avatar #422 to #356 - sugoi (08/12/2015) [-]
Ok cool I must have misheard.
Reply
+1
#456 to #57 - tarabostes (08/23/2015) [-]
Holy Hell this guy has to be the UGLIEST ************ i have ever seen.
His ******* face , it's one of the most disgusting ones on the face of Earth , plus his expression , like he's some sort of warrior of America , when he's just a whiney hipster. And His attitude , OH MY GOD it's deplorable , i don't know what kind of masochist would like to hang out with this guy. I bet he'd find a way to make EVERYTHING seem like **** .
Jesus Christ, even his mother must hate family dinners with him , i REALLY hope she has another son . Also i don't know what "two jobs" this faggot is working , but i BET it's somethin' like in a starbucks or somethin' "indie" . I read some of his Goddamn OkCupid profile , the fact that he even THINKS somebody would find a walking failed abortion attractive is weird. If all this scene happened years ago / in another country , his ass would have been thrown out of the bus instantly and he could do his little documentary and whine about rights he doesn't know **** about in the middle of nowhere. He's willing to take the time of other passangers just so he could look like a smug asshole on youtube or dream of ever "winning a court case" so he can become a millionaire like other retards he must see on T.V. This guy is one of the reasons why people laugh at 'MURICA and gays.
Reply
+11
User avatar #169 to #57 - oniiking (08/11/2015) [-]
What's the point in security if they can't even forcibly remove someone who has clearly not paid? At least one of them was an officer as well.
Reply
+1
User avatar #288 to #169 - wrocky (08/11/2015) [-]
it's america, i think he'd rather let him go through the justice system than physically involve himself in it
Reply
+1
#380 to #57 - Conemen (08/11/2015) [-]
"blue jean shorts that is"
Reply
+10
#278 to #57 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
how the hell do people in usa allow this to happen
in europe this guy would have been literally thrown off the train
Reply
+8
#362 to #278 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
I can confirm. While returning from a music festival I was all out of money, had no means to return home, so me & my friends decided to go on a train anyway. There was a mass check on the train and they kicked us out near (NEAR mind you) some small train station in the middle of assholeofearthville. luckily there we learned that we can purchase tickets that we can pay off after a trip and took the next train home. Did I scream about constitution? no. Did I deserve it? I don't know, maybe not when you look @ this from a humane side of the story but from the law side I was in the wrong. I don't have a grudge against anybody about this one. Do I feel I "lost" some rights? **** no. You have to be self centered, solipsist even hipster piece of genetic **** to think that in that situation.
Reply
0
#460 to #57 - anon (10/19/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll 1, Magic 8-Ball*"**
**anonymous rolls As I see it, yes**
Oh my ************* god the sheer stupidity flows from every orface on this one.

He ******* looks like a damn hipster and a creep. His hair is straight slicked down like a ******* creep. How the hell did the damn officers not yank his ass and throw him off the bus.
OMFG his voice annoys the **** out of me. The whole time i was thinking, please SOMEONE THROW HIS ASS ONTO THE ******* TRAIN TRACTS.
Reply
+10
#259 to #57 - voltkills ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
if I was a passenger on that rain id have dragged him the **** off when it stopped, what a ******* cunt.
Reply
+3
User avatar #291 to #259 - shunkahawolf ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
or just frisbee his phone out the door.
Reply
+2
User avatar #289 to #259 - wrocky (08/11/2015) [-]
he's 6'3. u can't just simply do that
Reply
+6
User avatar #290 to #289 - shunkahawolf ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
hes a skinny little cunt. looks like he weighs less than the **** i have to lug around at work everyday (entertainment centers, dressers, other heavy furniture.)
Reply
+2
User avatar #292 to #290 - wrocky (08/11/2015) [-]
good for you then. i was actually thinking of the same thing if i was in that situation but id have a problem with his height.. he may be light but ive had a history of skinny guys packing a punch..
Reply
+2
#369 to #292 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
Yhe they are glass cannons, they can throw one good punch - the next ones are weak af.

Source: Bouncer
Reply
+1
User avatar #309 to #292 - shunkahawolf ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
so let him punch you, then its assault
Reply
+1
#353 to #309 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
Never seen Karate Kid? All you gotta do is sweep the leg. Street fight rules allow punching someone while they're down, just no kicking. But it's technically a street fight so there are no rules, it's more of an honor thing.
Reply
+42
#108 to #57 - xxlasagnacrabxx (08/11/2015) [-]
hes asking for a bat to the legs
Reply
+38
#2 - austinrocket (08/10/2015) [-]
>HFW
Have fun in Cambodia
Reply
+50
#4 to #2 - isolovegames [OP](08/10/2015) [-]
At least they can be inhabitants of the free earth in Cambodia now.
Reply
+45
#15 - dcooney (08/10/2015) [-]
TFW riding in the cargo hold like ******* swine on the way to Cambodia
Reply
+163
User avatar #5 - ablakguy (08/10/2015) [-]
This sovereign citizen ******** almost makes me rage if it werent for the hilarious consequences that follow. Even though this is only the 2nd time ive heard about it seems that its spoiled 20 something year old brats who think they know the law. More please.
Reply
-1
#225 to #5 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
Yeah you must out your competition my dear 14 year old! You'll be 20 one day and see how retarded your ******* generation is
Reply
0
User avatar #453 to #5 - tanstin (08/15/2015) [-]
I bless you with this

www.reddit.com/r/amibeingdetained
Reply
-56
#221 to #5 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
"...its spoiled 20 something year old brats who think they know the law."

As opposed to you, a know-it-all 16-year old who still plays CoD most of the day, whose mommy and daddy still pay for their entire life?

I'm 24, kiddo. Say that again when you're out of the house, sweating on your own, facing the realities of the Real World without the shield of your parents.

A lot of assholes have made this world into **** , and then a lot of could-be-smart people like you decide to buy into their crap for your own petty entertainment.

-----

The Core of the "Sovereign Citizen" ideology is excellent....

Unfortunately, it's always the weirdos who are the first to buy in to "extreme" movements like that, so they do not always express themselves well, and make the movement look foolish.

"This sovereign citizen ******** almost makes me rage..."

I agree if SCs make your cringe (they even make me cringe, and I agree with them) , but why would it make you "Rage"?

Shouldn't the following make you "Rage":
> Trillions of dollars spent on wars with no / vague objectives?
> Maltreatment of our damaged veterans returning from said wars?
> Complete and total mismanagement of our country's finances, such that we have Trillion dollar Private Central Bank Debts and Trade deficits.
> REAL unemployment rate of ~20+%, and runaway Dollar and CPI inflation?
> Rampant dispersion of high-grade military gear to police.

Why aren't THOSE things making you rage, and instead, the "Sovereign Citizen" movement?

Grow up, and stop being a drama queen.
Reply
+28
#228 to #221 - lordoxygen (08/11/2015) [-]
Wait, who's the drama queen again now?
Reply
-26
#229 to #228 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
Read the comment again.

Not drama.... legitimate criticism.
Reply
-22
#233 to #230 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
Reading hard HURRRR
Reply
0
User avatar #310 to #229 - theaddviser (08/11/2015) [-]
It may be, but that way of typing it kinda sounds like those assholes who stand in front of a crowd shouting about things they Don't like. Not protesting just shouting there opinion.
Reply
0
User avatar #311 to #310 - theaddviser (08/11/2015) [-]
*their
Reply
+9
#317 to #221 - Bobtheblob (08/11/2015) [-]
Your name is blue, you should know the dangers of having a wrong opinion by now.
Reply
0
#411 to #317 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
See #410.

I think this site is probably not the place for me.

The red thumbs don't matter so much as seeing all the moronic, point-missing replies, and realizing that my Age Group is probably just as doomed as the ones that came before.

Unbelievably depressing.
Reply
+10
#274 to #221 - kinginthenorth (08/11/2015) [-]
That entire comment slowly became a ******* trainwreck of text effects, which only make it more of a pain in the ass to read.

>Implying people can only be mad about one thing
>Starting off your argument with a combo of strawmanning him and ad hominem
>Implying 24-year olds are all-knowing
> ****** sectioning halfway through the comment, almost as if indicating where the trainwreck is going to start

Sovereign Citizen **** is stupid at the core. If someone's on my lawn, they're going to have to listen to my rules or they can go be somewhere else. Sovereign Citizens think they can enforce THEIR interpretation of the Common Law wherever they go and only be held accountable to THEIR interpretation of the Common Law. Even though the Common Law only applies in (only listing the bigger countries): England, America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Ireland and Nothern Ireland. The majority of the world accepts the Civil Law or a variation of it. Even one of the states, Lousiana, uses Civil Law, instead of Common Law.
It's like going to someone's house, saying "Nono wait, i interpret this part of your rules this way and only this part of the rules applies to me".

Admittedly, the movement is based largely in America and Canada, so they can use the Common Law, however, not an interpretation of it and the Common Law is only applied when there is no law that can be applied to their situation (if i'm understand the wiki page right, might need a lawexplain or something). I believe there's plenty of laws and protocols to deal with people that have no citizenship or rejected their citizenship.

They ignore any context of the laws they think apply to them, some even grasping for the ******* Admiralty Law as if they can call on that when they're on land. The arguments they use have no validity within any form of Law besides their own. But their law doesn't apply anywhere, except for their own mind. Any regular court outright rejects their arguments. They even abuse paperwork (false notices of Lien) in order to slow down their court cases, just so they can avoid taxes.
Reply
-12
#287 to #274 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
1. My comment is easy to read. Get some proper nutrition and your brain might be able to handle such a spoon-fed comment.

2. I'm "Implying" nothing. I say exactly what I mean. Speaking of straw-men....

3. "Sovereign Citizen **** is stupid at the core."

Though many S.C.s behave like petulant assholes, S.C. ideas are derived from Anarchism, and the "Anarchist / Nonaggressive" idea that we should be forming societies based on cooperation is not a silly idea at all.

If you think that is a stupid idea, then I think your are an idiot, and ass, a waste of flesh and space, and I would prefer you do not exist, as you'll burden my existence.

SCs promote other ideas (see below), which I don't think are entirely effective, but if you are decrying Anarchism via Sovereign Citizen ideals, then I completely disagree with you.

4. "I believe there's plenty of laws and protocols to deal with people that have no citizenship or rejected their citizenship."

I address this in other comments. I agree that it is foolish and cringe-worthy for SCs to try to fight this battle, especially when the U.S.'s citizenship laws are in such complete disarray as they are now.

... notice, however, that THIS sub-point has nothing to do with my original rebuttal to OP regarding his 'rage' comment. This argument is a tangent, and a straw-man.

5. "They ignore any context of the laws they think apply to them..."

You appear to have not studied this issue in very much detail at all.

"Sovereign Citizens", in general terms, claim that a variety of artificial legal structures have been constructed around and within our 'legitimate' societies, without the consent or knowledge of those whose these 'illegal' frameworks now govern.

Therefore, they claim that a whole slews of Legal Instruments based off of this framework (whole volumes of taxes, licenses, regulations, legal personnel, political borders, procedures, etc. etc. etc. etc.) are all illegitimate.

Not a HUGE fan of this video, but here's a decent explanation from the "UK" angle: youtu.be/7sArXw6ajNg

About that, I agree with the SCs in principle and fact, but not in Tactics: I feel they are wasting their time trying to point out this system's "Illegality" to the system itself.

In the end, Force is all that matters in the establishment of "Law", and the Powers that they hate so much are the ones with all the force.

If they hate all these taxes, they should start taking concrete action to undermine them, and create an alternate society, not just whine about "Their Rights".... which are obviously long-gone anyways.... which, as i said, is the whole basis of their "Sovereign Citizen" argument.

------

Think for yourself, or enjoy a long, miserable life of burdensome, unjust rules, which suck your energy and fulfillment, until you die, frustrated and unfulfilled.
Reply
+8
#336 to #287 - kinginthenorth (08/11/2015) [-]
1. Leaving an empty line is usually used to indicate a new section. I'm used to properly formatted texts and not shards of an argument being posted as if they're all a different argument.

2. You implied: His age, his daily life, his living situation, his financial situation, his future, his view of himself (a know-it-all).

3. Any society is based on cooperation, you silly cunt. You have duties and rights. You pay taxes and the state provides you with services. You go to the doctor and the doctor fixes your health. I don't see how there isn't any cooperation there. Society is born from cooperation and a society doesn't exist without cooperation.

4. I can't be arsed to look up your other comments. My argument was about your comment and the SC movement, only indirectly defending OP's comment in any way. You can't dismiss it just because it doesn't apply to OP's comment. The only part of the citizenship laws that i couldn't find were what happens after you have revoked your citizenship.

5. These asshats can claim all they want, the state won't give a **** . Just because they're introducing new structures for companies doesn't mean they get to whine about it and claim the entire ******* society is illegitimate. If they really wanted to know all about the new laws coming out, they should buy a magazine that deals with that or even just find a site that updates whenever a new law comes out. Then they should examine the law to know when, where and how it applies.
Almost all law structures come into place because they're necessary. People try to find loopholes, loophole found, new law added to prevent loophole abuse, structure keeps expanding. Lawmaking is a natural process, so most laws are in place because they have to be. Some laws only apply only with certain conditions, but the movement ignores the conditions and goes straight to the law.

There's no fact to the entire damn movement. If you know and are able to apply your rights properly, they're never gone. It's retarded how they're trying to apply rights to situations where the rights don't apply.

At no point have i found any law to be "burdensome" or "unjust". The way you're describing it is as if the laws are draining your very lifeforce just by existing. Go buy an island and go **** yourself on there if you want to make your own laws.
Reply
-3
#409 to #336 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
"At no point have i found any law to be "burdensome" or "unjust"...."

I...... I don't even know what to say.

...It's like talking to a brick ******* wall.

Do you live on your own, in the U.S.? If so, how the HELL could you say this with a straight face!?
Reply
+1
#412 to #409 - kinginthenorth (08/11/2015) [-]
If i'm a brick wall, you're the ******* Great Wall of China mate.
If you don't break any laws, they're no issue for you and you're free to do whatever you feel like. It's the only way you can keep a large mass of people in any form of order.

No, i live in Belgium, the land where you don't get shot by everyone.
Nice arguments m8, i'm really convinced about the movement now.
Reply
-2
#416 to #412 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
1. Nice fifth-grade comeback, bred.

2. Wait, you're from ******* Belgium!?!

So why the hell are you even commenting?

Insane. I'm done.
Reply
+1
#417 to #416 - kinginthenorth (08/11/2015) [-]
We numbering now?
1. Nice arguments, bub

2. Because i think the movement, you included, is retarded and want to express that? I figured i'd see if you could actually get that, but guess i failed.
Leave then, you provided no real arguments, no discussion, not even any fun insults.
Reply
0
#459 to #274 - lawexplain (09/06/2015) [-]
Seems a lot involved that I don't feel like doing lol. But I respect the Deadpool pic.
Reply
+5
#381 to #221 - jarelk ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
Reply
-1
#398 to #381 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
I deserve this Webm, and not OP, who's probably a 16-year-old who has never had to support himself in his life?

As i said... stay classy, FJ.
Reply
+4
User avatar #226 to #221 - graboidzero (08/11/2015) [-]
lol... Bragging about being 24 years old to a 16 year old kid is like being proud of being the smartest kid in the short bus
Reply
-10
#227 to #226 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
I.... think you missed the point.

But congrats for hopping on the bandwagon.
Reply
+1
#366 to #221 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
While sovereign citizen is still ******** idea IF you happen to live WITHIN a ******* country I can confirm one thing: from outside perspective USA nowadays looks like a ******* hellhole to live in right now. Very little actual personal freedom in comparison with other countries (mine included) (yeah I said it), militarized cops, going ******* insane with military spending, making new enemies while being on a road to ********* finacially and geopolitically. USA is **** viewed from outside right now. Land of the free. Land of opportunity. For a cavity search maybe. Yeah. Laughable.
Reply
-1
#413 to #366 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
based anon.

But the other comments:

" NO!!!! USA USA USA USA UUUSSSAAAAA!!! "
" If you don't like it, go buy an island, fag "
" You think you don't have to live under laws " (missing the point)
" Look, Special snowflake doesn't like Laws "

Do people ever wonder why the world is the way it is (i.e. Falling the **** apart?)

Well, I think FJ just demonstrated a concentrated version of that, here in this comment section. SMFH.
Reply
+1
User avatar #238 to #221 - ayumu (08/11/2015) [-]
Multiple things can make you rage, friendo
Reply
-7
#240 to #238 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
I know, but I'm merely pointing out that instead of focusing "Rage" (pretty strong concept, there) on substantial issues (like the ones I listed), OP cheaply applied that word to a fairly.... benign.... issue.

Idiot Sovereign Citizens are cringey, but nothing serious enough to be the object of "Rage".

OP's just seeking attention more than he's trying to make an actual point or conversation.

"wHaT ThESe sOveRieGN CiTiZens Did wiLL sHoCK yOU!@!"

... I'm also just a little frightened that this uninspiring, clickbait-ish comment got over 100 up-votes, in a site that seems to think it's more 'enlightened' than the rest of the internet..
Reply
+29
User avatar #249 to #240 - admin (08/11/2015) [-]
another cuck claiming to speak for the 13,000 unique comment posters a day on this site...

Reply
+2
#277 to #249 - deepterror (08/11/2015) [-]
I dont think he is trying to speak for everyone, I think he is just pointing out that funnyjunk does foster an atmosphere of superiority, not that it is the only website that does so, im just saiyan
Reply
+1
User avatar #322 to #277 - admin (08/11/2015) [-]
oh so he read all 60 million+ comments in the database?
Reply
+1
#327 to #322 - deepterror (08/11/2015) [-]
You wouldn't need to. Funnyjunk, just like other websites, has its own stigmas and opinions. That is not to say that we all agree, because obviously we don't, but that is to be expected. There are just some opinions that seem to be held by a lot of people on here, at least by a lot of the ones commenting.
Reply
-9
#260 to #249 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
I just covered this in another thread with "unhealthy". I need to take a serious break from FJ, and knuckle down again on gettin' myself productive.

/channel/4chan/Sjw+s+get+sent+to+cambodia+for+the+lulz/DXzcLQK/247#247

I have (irresponsibly) relied on this site for haven and rejuvenation, but there are too many malnourished, intellectually-stunted, supplicating beta Statist ******** on this site for me to relax here anymore. Gotta come back with bigger guns.
Reply
+15
User avatar #326 to #260 - admin (08/11/2015) [-]
self-important weak white guy thinks the world cares when he gets bored of a website

**** off
Reply
+2
User avatar #370 to #326 - teddybearlove ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
You tell him addy!

You ok though mang?
Reply
+2
User avatar #329 to #326 - rejakted (08/11/2015) [-]
Addy you've been really angry these coupla days.
You okay?
Reply
-1
#406 to #326 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
We're all self-important, weak white guys, Admin.

I don't think anyone 'cares', I'm just venting.

Seriously, look at this Content's comment section (beside my ********* ) - it's a absolute disaster zone.
Reply
+2
User avatar #421 to #406 - admin (08/12/2015) [-]
almost no one on this site likes you.

all of your replies are desperate "look how smart I am!" ********

you should strongly consider suicide.
Reply
-1
#423 to #421 - swagbot (08/12/2015) [-]
Get off your man-period, Addy.
Reply
0
#389 to #326 - marioisbestpony (08/11/2015) [-]
Calm down, man. He's not worth your time.
Reply
0
#378 to #260 - jarelk ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
Every single one of your comments in this thread is incredibly cringe worthy.

Unless you're writing a novel or trying to find a single word to perfectly describe something, don't stay stuff like "haven and rejuvenation" and "supplicating". Especially not so many in a row.

You're not a special snowflake, cunt.
Reply
-1
#407 to #378 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
BIG WOrDZ HURt BraiN HURRR.

What are you, a special-ed fifth grader?

Why do you guys just restate your opinions as is they're supposed to impress someone... without explaining them, or getting into a deeper discussion.

I guess FJ really is a ******** .
Reply
0
#408 to #249 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
WAIT, WAS THIS DIRECTED AT ME!?!

Are you seriously siding with OP?

Admin what **** are you on lately?
Reply
0
#279 to #249 - kinginthenorth (08/11/2015) [-]
That must be including boards or something
Reply
0
User avatar #268 to #249 - jonnyfrosty ONLINE (08/11/2015) [-]
13000? What?
Reply
0
#390 to #221 - marioisbestpony (08/11/2015) [-]
God damn, that was cringy.
Reply
0
#393 to #390 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
An excellent reply....

Full of.... ONE statement, of opinion.
Reply
0
#396 to #394 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
Again...
Reply
0
#400 to #397 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
Must be a lonely life on the bandwagon...
Reply
0
User avatar #402 to #400 - marioisbestpony (08/11/2015) [-]
Aren't you glad you're getting replies?
Reply
0
#403 to #402 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
Honestly?

No.

Idiotic, low-IQ replies from people like you actually wear me out.

Please stop *********** .
Reply
-1
User avatar #405 to #403 - marioisbestpony (08/11/2015) [-]
>Please stop *********** .
Oh, the irony.
Reply
0
#414 to #405 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
Ugh... last reply.

Did you actually read any of my comments, or did you just hop on the trounce-someone-and-feel-good-about-it bandwagon?

My comments are organized, and focus on discussing the ideas of the thread.

Other peoples' comments are just random, unsubstantiated insults.

Look at all of your comments, #5, #381....Not a single piece of 'discussion'.

That is the very definition of ' ************* .
Reply
0
User avatar #415 to #414 - marioisbestpony (08/11/2015) [-]
****** , please stop. You first comment shows that you're either an edgy 12 year old named Cleetus or just trying too hard to troll. The rest are pretty retarded as well.
Reply
0
User avatar #373 to #221 - TopDawg (08/11/2015) [-]
In all truth general stupidity on a high level such as the "SC" movement and the examples you provided makes me rage. Both government and civilian stupidity.

Reply
0
#395 to #373 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
TL;dR of my comment is this:

> S.C.s should make you cringe, not Rage.
> Government Actions should make you "Rage".
> ...and, OP was shamelessly thumb-whoring by writing a dramatic click-bait comment.

**** , i think Admin even agrees with me (below).
Reply
0
User avatar #399 to #395 - TopDawg (08/11/2015) [-]
I didn't need a TL;DR though, I can into words
Reply
0
#401 to #399 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
............?
Reply
0
#404 to #401 - TopDawg (08/11/2015) [-]
Just forget this ever happened between us.
Reply
0
User avatar #365 to #221 - fukkendragonite (08/11/2015) [-]
The comment was legit as **** but the way it was written, the rage you got into, the big bold text and the subsequent replies....well I think this was a misjudgement mate.
Reply
0
#410 to #365 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
If this site is autistic enough to thumb someone down based on formatting, and not over content, then I think this is not the place for me.

FJ is behaving like the exact cucks that we complain about so much.
Reply
+1
User avatar #434 to #410 - fukkendragonite (08/12/2015) [-]
Man I don't know who is to turning into what or why I should hate them I just like the funny pictures. This site takes itself too seriously.
Reply
0
#313 to #221 - ogasm (08/11/2015) [-]
I'm 21, living on my own, and i agree with ablakguy. So suck a dick.
Reply
+14
User avatar #10 to #5 - thesoulless (08/10/2015) [-]
That's exactly what it is; it follows along the same lines as those kinds of people who ask "Am I being detained, officer?" at a DUI checkpoint.
Reply
+32
#50 to #10 - anon (08/10/2015) [-]
You do have rights when you get pulled over. If you're pulled over but not for a DUI, for instance, you can deny a drug test of any kind. Knowing your rights and not allowing a chance for any policeman to bully you is not being a hipster faggot, it's protecting yourself from the fact that assholes exist and some of them become policemen. I think the bigger faggot is the guy who tells them to just to whatever the cops want him to.
Reply
+9
User avatar #71 to #50 - thesoulless (08/11/2015) [-]
I never said that you should just let cops have their way with you, but you're not exactly defending democracy by making a big fuss when you can just say "No, officer, I haven't had anything to drink tonight." and go on your way.
Reply
+3
User avatar #148 to #50 - slayzo (08/11/2015) [-]
If I can drive through a DUI checkpoint, say "No sir, I have not been drinking" and then leave, I definitely don't feel like the policeman had his way with me. Heck, I've never been asked to step out at a DUI check point, and I've never seen anyone I've drove with have to step out. Probably because we're not "am I being detained" faggots or drunk driving assholes.
Reply
+3
User avatar #143 to #50 - KillinTime (08/11/2015) [-]
There's a big difference between letting the officer have his way with you and intentionally giving the officer a hard time for no reason. Most of the time they are just doing their job trying to keep YOU ungrateful asswipes safe.
Reply
-6
#246 to #143 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
ehhhhh...... be careful, here:

"There's a big difference between letting the officer have his way with you and intentionally giving the officer a hard time for no reason."

Agreed. Many of these Sovereign Citizens are trying to pick a fight, as a cheap, misguided, ineffective way of making some kind of 'statement', or just for kicks.

I hate it when they do this - it "poisons the well", makes them and anyone supporting the SC movement look like idiots, and it sets the movement BACK, instead of advancing its otherwise excellent goals.

"Most of the time they are just doing their job trying to keep YOU ungrateful asswipes safe."

.... buuuuuut on the other hand, I wouldn't go so far as to say this.

I feel that (and i feel statistics support that) most police are deployed nowadays for almost any other reason than "keeping the peace", as is the original mission of any "police officer".

I think they're deployed as enforcers of insane, unjust, completely-off-the-rails laws, as strong-arm men for local power-structures and good-ol'-boys-clubs, and as revenue gatherers, as well as agents of much LARGER, more nefarious operations (Think: Prison-Industrial complex).

-----

But of course, discussing minutiae such as "How to Reform Traffic Stop Protocol" is completely moot, because IMO, nothing's gonna save the U.S. as it stands.

There are too many diametrically-opposite, irreconcilable opinions existing too close to each-other. The country's gonna have to split apart in order to survive peaceably alongside one another...

... and unfortunately, THAT'S not gonna happen, because too many people are too shallow to go through the effort of making a peaceful, rational separation, so there will probably be a massive, complicated Civil War. I see no other outcome.
0
#242 to #143 - swagbot has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+8
User avatar #30 to #5 - datassman (08/10/2015) [-]
If you want to see more, there's a couple of subreddits dedicated to making fun of them, the most popular being r/amibeingdetained. They're pretty ******* funny
Reply
0
User avatar #178 to #30 - volcanicdiarrhea (08/11/2015) [-]
Good god, I watched one video and I'm filled with more rage than I can handle.
Do they all sound like broken records, repeating the exact same phrase ********************* ?
Reply
0
User avatar #182 to #178 - datassman (08/11/2015) [-]
Yep. "Am I being detained" and "I do not consent to this" are their favorite lines. Alternatively, "I don't have to pay that"
Reply
+65
#22 - thrifty (08/10/2015) [-]
Sure hope there aren't any schpiders in Cambodia.
Reply
0
User avatar #223 to #22 - trollzoll (08/11/2015) [-]
Sauce?
Reply
-6
#196 to #22 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
I hope that dude is satire
Reply
+3
User avatar #379 to #196 - yaybacon (08/11/2015) [-]
It's not. Wake up.
Reply
+16
User avatar #7 - cyrodill (08/10/2015) [-]
Where comes this free citizen from, and how do they think?
Reply
0
User avatar #145 to #7 - juter (08/11/2015) [-]
It sounds to me like that same **** the bitch tried to pull on that cop who yanked her out of her car when she started spouting some Articles of Confederation ******** .
Reply
+8
#8 to #7 - isolovegames [OP](08/10/2015) [-]
(Probably wrong about the first part entirely so don't trust me) Probably some declaration someone made forever ago that's outdated as **** but makes Tumbl-twats like the people in the story blurt out retarded as **** things hoping said document is viable. For the second part- they don't think.
Reply
+19
User avatar #14 to #8 - huszti (08/10/2015) [-]
>>#7,
according to article 4 of the articles on confederation (which were replaced by the US constitution in 1789) states something about free inhabitants. in short, tards think it means they can do whatever, actually it just means people can travel freely from state to state inside the US
Reply
0
#357 to #14 - newdevyx (08/11/2015) [-]
So kind of like what the Nordic countries have.
Reply
0
#167 to #14 - anon (08/11/2015) [-]
Makes sense since the states were all but individual countries at that time.
Reply
+15
#34 - spoperman (08/10/2015) [-]
Remember kids, this is why you don't be a complete ******** to authorities
Reply
+31
#32 - swirlytwirl ONLINE (08/10/2015) [-]
God bless this border anon.
Reply
+11
#72 - lulzdealer (08/11/2015) [-]
I guess you could say they...

took a Holiday In Cambodia
Reply
+19
#13 - Byte (08/10/2015) [-]
Sending illegals oversea should be a national standard.
Sending illegals oversea should be a national standard.
Reply
+8
User avatar #37 - catkyte (08/10/2015) [-]
this was so beautiful.
Reply
+21
#44 - deadpoolrulez (08/10/2015) [-]
I really ******* hope this teaches those sjw's to not **** with the authority, first you get arrested for claiming you dont need to follow laws, then you get deported to cambodia for for claiming they dont need a passport.
Reply
+2
#222 to #44 - swagbot (08/11/2015) [-]
Sovereign citizens = SJWs?

Dude................ what?

I know some "Anti-Establishement" types are cringey, but they are not associated with SJW Tumblrettes in any way.

Stop conflating the two.
Reply
+6
#35 - acemplas (08/10/2015) [-]
I'm not sure if I should be worried or amazed
Reply
+5
#363 - SuperHyperCrazy (08/11/2015) [-]
That's actually pretty ****** up, that you can just send anybody without papers anywhere for ***** and giggles.

That being said, those people definitely deserved it.
Reply
+5
User avatar #33 - mrjweezy (08/10/2015) [-]
My sides have left this reality
Reply
+8
#89 - morebuckets (08/11/2015) [-]
On one hand, that's a bit dickish, but on the other hand, totally deserved.
Reply
+4
User avatar #270 - marking (08/11/2015) [-]
I cross the US/Mexico Border a whole ******* lot during the year (visiting family in Mexico and going to college in the US) and if I know one thing, it is that when it comes to the Border Patrol officers they can be the biggest assholes in the ******* place. One rule remains constant though, just ******* follow the procedures and dont be a dick yourself. If you act like a self reserved prick and make a big deal trying to make a stance on something stupidly insignificant like not opening your trunk or allowing them to search your stuff for illegal drugs youre just begging to find yourself in a small little room with homeland security getting all your files. Just do what the officer says and move on.
1234>
[ 460 comments ]
Leave a comment

Top Content in 24 Hours

No entries found.
<
>
 Friends (0)