yes because surely that plane had to be made of some sort of wierd weak rubber which burned up in the flames, and surerly the planes had tons and tons of water as fuel and not some silly gasoline nononono how could a plane hold so much gasoline, that would be dangerous it could explode! and surely that building was made of the strongest metal in the world which doesnt have a weak point like most buildings. Surely it had to be moving at max 5mph! i mean like a plane would have to move in a great speed to keep up with like 20 ton of steel flying in the air, that would be dangerous it could tear a whole building down! Surely that cant be possible! there has to be a logical explanation to it, why would a plane made of steel filled with highly pressured gasoline moving at over 500mph be able to destroy a building?! IMPOSSIBLE! its more likely that someone had brought enough explosive into the entire building to tear it down without anybody noticing it... surely that must be correct...

sounds legit

gif relevant

...watch wtc 7, that wasn't hit by a plan and fell; at free fall speed just like the twin towers, do some research and don't just believe what mainstream propaganda tells you

mainstream propaganda is too mainstream.... but seriously have "the illuminati" corrupted you? you probly also believe in that reptile theory or something like that. I blame bad pilots...

Who are you and how did you know that derp

The towers were designed to Pancake so they wouldn't flatten other buildings.

buildings don't just "pancake" over nothing... in a controlled demolition, yes they "pancake" and fall into there own footprint. and yes that's so they don't hit surrounding buildings you're correct on that one my good sir

wasnt that the building that got hit by one of the wtc buildings?

Exactly! I mean it's not like a fucking plane crashed into the building or anything!

Please, don't start. 911 conspiracy arguments are worse then the religious debates. The jokes are on thing, but let's not start the shitstorm arguments.