Mind Blown. while browsing /sci/. I Multiverse real? Anonymous 10/ / 12( Sunil( y. 28 Replies: Is there actually a universe where I' m not a lonely but a rich a mindblown chan multiverse
Upload
Login or register

Mind Blown

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
 
Mind Blown. while browsing /sci/. I Multiverse real? Anonymous 10/ / 12( Sunil( y. 28 Replies: Is there actually a universe where I' m not a lonely but a rich a

while browsing /sci/

I Multiverse real? Anonymous 10/ / 12( Sunil( y. 28 Replies:
Is there actually a universe where I' m not a lonely but a rich and successful physicist who dates a super model?
I Anonymous 10/ / 42( Sun) 20: 30 hlo_ 51553[
AUP:
Unfortunately not for you. You appear to be completely identical every single possible permutation of universe their is. Sorry man.
I Anonymous 10/ / 42( Sun) 20: 31 No/ M 55308 Replies:
If multiverse theory is true, then there must be a universe where multiverse theory is false.
I Anonymous 10/ / 42( Sungla: 37 No/
Someone in another universe is not you.
CI sage 10/ / 12( No_ 5155351
oh fuck
oh fuck oh fuck oh fuck oh fuck oh fuck oh fuck
I Anonymous 10/ / 12( No_ 5155352
divided by zero. FUCK
...
+2640
Views: 75093 Submitted: 10/16/2012
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (361)
[ 361 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#75 - nucularwar
Reply +50 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
#328 to #75 - theholum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
I'm an atheist, but i don't believe in the multiverse theory

And don't debate me, please
User avatar #364 to #75 - andalitemadness
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
Hardly anyone really believes in the multiverse theory.
User avatar #40 - Compootor
Reply +34 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
My laptop BSOD'd 30 seconds after I enlarged this image. My Laptop hasn't had a Blue Screen once since I got it. This post just blew my computer's mind.
User avatar #54 to #40 - ubercripple
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
Apparently You need to login to view this link blows my computer's mind. Whenever I go to the 'play in browser' page, it BSOD's.
#157 - enragedanon
Reply +30 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
I just finished by philosophy paper on multiverse theory and never considered this. ****.
#172 to #157 - anonymoose
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
I doubt that. If you did a paper on the multiverse theory you'd know that the multiverse theory cannot affect things external to the multiverse theory i.e. the existence of other universes.

If I'm wrong, your paper must be filled with holes.
User avatar #178 to #172 - anonymoose
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
external to the specific universe*
User avatar #238 to #172 - rockamekishiko
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
but maybe in one universe that rule is broken...
User avatar #316 to #238 - anonymoose
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
. . . no.
#43 - deathofnight
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
User avatar #60 to #43 - essaressa
Reply -20 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
his face looks perfect for

I CAME
#325 to #60 - elcreepo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
No.
No.
#17 - djequalizee
Reply +25 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
If the multiverse theory is true, then that means that in at least one universe, somewhere, i am batman.
User avatar #111 to #17 - hefromnorway
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
That also means that there is another universe where you're getting brutally raped by a big black guy, and you're liking it ...
User avatar #20 to #17 - sjsharks
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
that means your parents are dead
User avatar #53 to #20 - himyouknowwho
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
if the multiverse theory is true, then it means that there are an universe were batman have parents.
User avatar #24 to #20 - iHAXnoobs
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
worth it
#22 to #20 - djequalizee
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
k.
User avatar #23 - iHAXnoobs
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
except the multiverse theory only states that whenever a particle does one thing instead of the other it creates another universe, so every single universe that exist follows the same laws of physics.
#55 to #23 - ubercripple
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
But what if multiverses precede the big bang, leading to an alternate system of physics, in universes where the big bang happened differently, or not at all? Or if there was another reality prior to the big bang that then collapsed in a big crunch, which also followed a different set of physical laws?
But what if multiverses precede the big bang, leading to an alternate system of physics, in universes where the big bang happened differently, or not at all? Or if there was another reality prior to the big bang that then collapsed in a big crunch, which also followed a different set of physical laws?
User avatar #385 to #55 - iHAXnoobs
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2012) [-]
the big bang didn't create physics
User avatar #386 to #385 - ubercripple
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/19/2012) [-]
For all we know, any circumstances surrounding the big bang could have affected the way in which the laws of physics manifested themselves. Nobody has any way of proving that either right or wrong.
User avatar #387 to #386 - iHAXnoobs
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/21/2012) [-]
I'm trying my absolute best to not be offensive, but you are clearly a child with a very small understanding of physics, don't try to come up with wild random hypothesis and claim that "Nobody has any way of proving that either right or wrong"
User avatar #388 to #387 - ubercripple
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/21/2012) [-]
I was being a bit flippant with my first comment, and I obviously couldn't know whether or not the big bang influenced the way the laws of physics manifested themselves. I don't claim to be an expert in physics, but I am also not a child. What I am saying is that nobody could possibly know the way in which the laws of physics manifested. I did not come up with a hypothesis, I was posing a question. I usually do hate the "can't prove me wrong" argument as well, but the point is I'm not posing an argument.

Additionally, just because one theory says something doesn't mean there aren't different equally valid theories opposing that idea, especially in theories regarding multiverses and the big bang. If you're willing to acknowledge that you were a tad rude in your presumptuousness I will yield. But the universe is a much larger and complex place than we could possibly imagine, especially at this point in our scientific history, and assuming that you know details of matters beyond anyone's grasp at this time shows great disrespect for the scientific process.
User avatar #167 to #55 - EdwardNigma
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
You saved the day. And this means I can create fire in one universe.
Sounds great.
#41 to #23 - mrswagly
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
DAMMIT I WANTED TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO FLY AND REPLACE WHAT AIR LOOKED LIKE WITH THE WAY FIRE LOOKS! THIS RUINS EVERYTHING!
#139 - BobbyMcFerrin
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
No.

If the multiverse theory is correct, it is not considered a variable that can change from dimension to dimension.

The multiverse theory postulates that all cosmological and atomic events within the realm of possibility exist simultaneously. In other words, it is not the theory of "multiple universes", but rather the theory that this universe has an infinite number of copies of itself. Energy throughout all of these copies is still constant. These copies are also not distinguished from one another. Rather, all possible outcomes of every atomic event from the multiverse's birth foreward are contained within a single point. In order to distinguish between copies, one must "jump down a dimension". This "jump" is analogous to picking a line in an infinite plane. In order to pick a point in time in the copy you have chosen, you must "jump" down one more level. This is analogous to picking a point on the infinitely long line you have chosen.

I could go on but I don't think anyone else really cares. Hope you enjoyed anyway.
User avatar #141 to #139 - Icedangel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
I read that in Homers voice. Suddenly learning just became more fun.
#143 to #139 - hybredmoon
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #146 to #139 - beerterror
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
Of course, and I'm sure that the clever Anon was aware of that too. But it made a wonderful thread and a food for thought anyway.
#161 to #139 - derpykong **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#177 to #139 - TheCynic
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
My science hurts.
My science hurts.
User avatar #145 to #139 - techketzer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
While I can't claim this makes any sense to me, it's highly interesting.
Thank you for sharing the insight.
User avatar #154 to #145 - BobbyMcFerrin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
This might help with the "jumping" analogy:

Part 1: www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkxieS-6WuA
Part 2: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySBaYMESb8o&feature=relmfu
User avatar #179 to #139 - BobbyMcFerrin
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
It seems as if there is interest in the topic, so I'll write a bit more:

The multiverse theory is not simply the product of an active imagination wondering "what if?". It is based on advancements in quantum physics, and may actually hold credence.

The multiverse theory is one of the many children of the double-slit experiment. This experiment sought to quantify the behavior of electrons as either a wave-form or a particle. No one was to expect what the experiment actually found.

If one were to shoot paintballs a piece of plywood with two slots in it, the wall behind the plywood would be painted with two stripes of paint. However, if this same piece of plywood were submerged in water so that the top half of the slots were above the water level, and a single wave was directed at it, something different would happen. The wave would hit the two slots and create two waveforms propagating in a half-circle from the slots on the opposite side. These two waves would interfere with one another, tops canceling bottoms, tops magnifying tops, and bottoms magnifying bottoms. If the wall were to be "painted" where the waves hit the back wall the highest, multiple stripes would be visible, which is known as the interference pattern.

If single electrons were fired at two slots, and the 'wall' behind the slots observed, scientists could this difference between wave behavior and particle behavior to determine the true nature of electrons. Well, upon doing this, the pattern on the back wall proved to be an interference pattern. Wait what? So a single piece of matter interfered with itself, and hit the wall as if it were a waveform. It gets better. When scientists used observing technology to map the path of the electron and ran the test again, the electrons began showing a two-slot pattern on the back wall! The mere act of observing the electron changed its behavior.

Continued-->
User avatar #180 to #179 - BobbyMcFerrin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
So to summarize, the electron behaved as a "wave of probability" when it was not being observed. Upon introducing an observer, the probability wave collapsed into a single "value". This is to say that everything we see around us is made up of collapsed probability waves. This is also to say that the minute no one is looking, the "matter" ceases to exist in the form we know. Instead, it exists in all mathematically possible positions simultaneously. Now, imagine our brains and our instruments are processors capable of compiling the data in our universe into a "readable" 3-dimensional form along a straight line in the 4th dimension (time). If this is true, and we are merely compiling the information that we come across, then it is a logical consequence that this 'information' exists outside of ourselves in its uncompiled form. This 'reservoir' of uncompiled data is what is known as the multiverse.

I personally agree with the theory, but it is by no means infallible.
#152 to #139 - freemanareso
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
<Me trying to figure out what you just said.
User avatar #144 to #139 - hybredmoon
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
nnnnnnnnnnnnnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDD!
#181 to #144 - therealredhood
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
Here you go, good sir.
Here you go, good sir.
#265 - newfagsrus
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #309 to #265 - homopanda
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
This gif and promises by Nero is one of the greatest things i've ever seen
User avatar #269 to #265 - damnusername
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
i'm listening to black masks and gasoline by rise against, and that picture fits perfectly with the song
User avatar #273 to #269 - fuzzyballs
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
I'm proud of you
#294 to #273 - AcornShouter
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
**AcornShouter rolled a random image posted in comment #153 at Fangirls ** im proud of you for being proud of him
**AcornShouter rolled a random image posted in comment #153 at Fangirls ** im proud of you for being proud of him
User avatar #372 to #294 - fuzzyballs
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
you're a dissapointment....
#79 - anaklusmos
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
if the multiverse theory is true then there is a universe where frodo and sam are taking the ring to mordor as we speak.
if the multiverse theory is true then there is a universe where frodo and sam are taking the ring to mordor as we speak.
User avatar #82 to #79 - YourLordAndMaster
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
That means there's a universe where the eagles flew the hobbits to Mt Doom
#84 to #82 - orangepikmin
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
Which means that in another universe, this guy isn't dead yet.
User avatar #86 to #84 - YourLordAndMaster
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(10/17/2012) [-]
In another universe he never existed