Upload
Login or register
x

Jews

Return] [Catalog] [Bottom] [Update] [[3 Auto] 1 new post 32 I 6/ 19 I 2
File: . igg (41 KB, 640x375)
Anonymous (ID: )E
738
Why do Jews mutilate their penis?
Anonymous (ID: )
5( Sun) 03: 26: 48 No. 51 601068 F
Anonymous (ID: (tie! ) lailii',"
Jewish women can' t resist anything that' s 10% off.
...
+1865
Views: 62500
Favorited: 103
Submitted: 09/14/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to chokinandtokin Subscribe to 4chan

Comments(359):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
123>
[ 359 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
185 comments displayed.
Reply
+535
#12 - anon (09/14/2015) [-]
I thought it was because they don't leave tips.
Reply
+9
User avatar #259 to #12 - idontknowwhattouse (09/15/2015) [-]
seeing as theirs is gone wouldnt that mean they did?
Reply
0
User avatar #324 to #259 - ChuckNorrisVsMRT (09/15/2015) [-]
He means they don't leave it on?
Reply
+207
#1 - fappening (09/14/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
Reply
+1
User avatar #298 to #1 - afonzi (09/15/2015) [-]
You must have gotten a lot of notificatios in the past due to your name man...
Reply
+4
#313 to #298 - itrinx (09/15/2015) [-]
Nickname too white
Reply
+1
#348 to #298 - fappening (09/15/2015) [-]
I did
I did
Reply
+172
User avatar #8 - protectorofjam (09/14/2015) [-]
I'm not jewish and I got Circed
Reply
+6
#240 to #8 - innocentbabies (09/15/2015) [-]
It has some health benefits, actually. Smegma gets trapped under the foreskin, resulting in an infection and immune response. The higher white blood cell levels leave you more susceptible to HIV transmission.
I think anyway, I read it online a year or so back, and you know how everything on the internet is trustworthy.
Reply
+46
#242 to #240 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
All you have to do is pull back your foreskin when you take a shower and clean it. It's not difficult. I'd take a non mutilated penis over less hygiene work any day of the week.
Reply
+15
User avatar #243 to #242 - congorepublic (09/15/2015) [-]
It was common back then bc showering wasn't exactly a daily option
Reply
+13
User avatar #256 to #243 - catburglarpenis (09/15/2015) [-]
Yup. Nowadays they're just cutting off thousands of nerve endings for no ******* reason. "Ribbed for her pleasure" condoms actually simulate foreskin, leading to a wave of people restoring their foreskins with something called "PUD" I believe (can't be bothered to Google it right meow).

It's on my to-do list, right behind "end world hunger" and "prove the Holocaust was a lie", but it's there.
Reply
+5
#257 to #256 - congorepublic (09/15/2015) [-]
I've read that the loss of pleasure is a myth
Reply
+2
User avatar #312 to #257 - johnrocks (09/15/2015) [-]
a lot of people talk about the loss of pleasure, but i think of it as a stamina bonus
Reply
+1
#316 to #257 - justtocomment (09/15/2015) [-]
It is. There are many late-in-life circumcision patients who report no loss of pleasure, just pleasure in different areas.
Reply
-1
User avatar #261 to #260 - catburglarpenis (09/15/2015) [-]
How do I link to posts dammit this used to work fine addy
Reply
+1
User avatar #275 to #261 - markipliergame (09/15/2015) [-]
1. Open comment boc
2. Click on comment number
3. ???
4. Go **** yourself
Reply
0
User avatar #278 to #275 - catburglarpenis (09/15/2015) [-]
Why do you do this to me Markiplier?

I donated to your thing.

How rude.

But thanks tho
Reply
+1
User avatar #279 to #278 - markipliergame (09/15/2015) [-]
but I helped you
Reply
+3
#286 to #279 - catburglarpenis (09/15/2015) [-]
I said thanks ***** what do you want from me
Reply
+2
User avatar #287 to #286 - markipliergame (09/15/2015) [-]
ur cock
Reply
0
User avatar #273 to #261 - chillybilly (09/15/2015) [-]
>>#261, You need to use the meme arrows friend
:^)
Reply
-1
#315 to #256 - justtocomment (09/15/2015) [-]
Your foreskin is multiple raised ridges along the entire length of your penis?
Because thats what a ribbed condom is. It's actually simulating the height of the tip of the penis multiple times throughout the length. Unless you've got a really ******* weird foreskin.
Reply
0
User avatar #322 to #315 - catburglarpenis (09/15/2015) [-]
When you get erect, the head pokes out of the foreskin, and the foreskin comes down and bunches up like a sleeve on a shirt. If you want the full lowdown, >>#258
Reply
+2
User avatar #268 to #243 - borcha (09/15/2015) [-]
or you could like not take a shower and ... wash only your member
Reply
+1
User avatar #290 to #243 - Shramin (09/15/2015) [-]
It was common in the past because it was believed to stop masturbation, had nothing to do with health or cleanliness.
Reply
+1
#295 to #290 - masterboll (09/15/2015) [-]
thats a pretty **** way to stop masturbation

considering that its a practice thats gone on for thousands of years, dont you think they would have at least found out that it has no effect on masturbation?

the health and cleanliness assumption makes more sense than the stop masturbation one
Reply
0
User avatar #296 to #243 - alexandrz (09/15/2015) [-]
It was common back then due to a misconception about masturbation. Hence why it's an American culture thing because it was so widespread at the time.
Reply
0
User avatar #309 to #242 - machineemperor (09/15/2015) [-]
So you're saying they did this to save money on there water bills? now that's pretty extreme
Reply
+3
#288 to #240 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Dude just because you have a ****** cut penis doesn't mean you have to try and justify genital mutilation, health benefits? I guess if you are a disgusting ****** who doesn't clean his penis daily when you shower then yeah, I guess it can have some health benefits, but if you are that ****** up it doesn't really matter what your penis looks like, you ain't gonna smash anyway
Reply
+2
#310 to #240 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
or you know...you can wash your dick everyday so you're not a bacterial host.
Reply
0
#317 to #240 - justtocomment (09/15/2015) [-]
You're absolutely correct. It all but eliminates the risk of penile cancer, makes the transmission of STDs less likely, and even prevents infections beneath the extra skin. Now, everyone is going to throw back at you with "its easy to clean" and completely ignore the other very relevant facts.
Also the ******** about loss of pleasure is just that: ******** .
Reply
0
User avatar #294 to #240 - enlightednatzie (09/15/2015) [-]
I just wash my foreskin.
Reply
+5
User avatar #252 to #8 - mranldestroyer ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
found the american
Reply
+7
User avatar #40 to #8 - StewieGGriffin (09/14/2015) [-]
Same, too bad you're in England. Girls love 10% off dick over here.
Reply
+10
User avatar #65 to #40 - protectorofjam (09/15/2015) [-]
Why do you think I'm from England?
Reply
+4
User avatar #69 to #65 - StewieGGriffin (09/15/2015) [-]
OOPS the other guy said hes English not you. My bad
Reply
+4
User avatar #70 to #69 - protectorofjam (09/15/2015) [-]
Oh, ok
Reply
0
#149 to #70 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
just kidding I'm pretty sure you're a British crumpet eating cunt.
Reply
+3
#311 to #8 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
The role of infant circumcision in the United States of America is mysterious. The US is the only country in the world where the majority of baby boys have part of their penises cut off for non-religious reasons. Yet this extraordinary custom is very much taken for granted. If it were being introduced today, it would certainly be rejected as barbaric and un-American.
Reply
+12
#222 to #8 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
At an age where you can't think for yourself or make any decisions and man cut off part of your dick. I wish that didn't happen to me
Reply
-3
#269 to #222 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Why do you want a foreskin?
Reply
+1
#271 to #269 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
are you in denial
or are you actually asking
Reply
+1
#345 to #271 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Actually asking, I'm circumcised and I've never wanted a foreskin so I'm curious why you do.
Reply
+62
User avatar #10 to #8 - Ruspanic (09/14/2015) [-]
It's pretty common for non-Jewish Americans to get circumcised, because at one point it was promoted as a way to stop boys from masturbating.
Getting less common, though.
Reply
+44
#47 to #10 - damson (09/14/2015) [-]
>stop boys from masturbating

What genius thought that was gonna work
Reply
+4
User avatar #127 to #49 - damson (09/15/2015) [-]
The cereal people?
Reply
+15
User avatar #136 to #127 - thegamepixel (09/15/2015) [-]
Found this:
"Kellogg worked on the rehabilitation of masturbators, often employing extreme measures, even mutilation, on both sexes. He was an advocate of circumcising young boys to curb masturbation and applying phenol to a young woman's clitoris. In his Plain Facts for Old and Young, he wrote:
'A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases. The soreness which continues for several weeks interrupts the practice, and if it had not previously become too firmly fixed, it may be forgotten and not resumed.'"
Reply
+4
#248 to #136 - semiperfectcell (09/15/2015) [-]
holy **** that's sick
Reply
+1
#318 to #248 - justtocomment (09/15/2015) [-]
*(It's also half-researched and from a college humor skit where they actively ignore thay circumcision was prevalent well before a single man from the Kelloggs created a Christian crusade about it.)
Don't take these things at face value because they are written for shock value.
Reply
+8
#62 to #47 - teseus (09/14/2015) [-]
The same people that designed this in order to stop masturbation. Victorian era was ****** .
The same people that designed this in order to stop masturbation. Victorian era was ****** .
Reply
+6
#126 to #62 - damson (09/15/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
Reply
-1
User avatar #130 to #47 - failtolawl (09/15/2015) [-]
Assumable the same genius who that was the actual reason and went with it.
Reply
+21
User avatar #11 to #10 - prycebear (09/14/2015) [-]
Im English and I have it done, happened when I was 18 :/
Reply
+5
User avatar #13 to #11 - Ruspanic (09/14/2015) [-]
**** man, that's pretty late...
Why'd you have it done?
Reply
+30
User avatar #15 to #13 - prycebear (09/14/2015) [-]
Well Dicks too big for the skin I had mild phimosis as well as getting multiple Std's and doctors said it was for the best or could lose whole thing
Reply
+10
User avatar #34 to #15 - mutzaki (09/14/2015) [-]
You have multiple STD's?
Reply
0
User avatar #331 to #34 - prycebear (09/15/2015) [-]
Had* But yeah
Reply
0
User avatar #334 to #331 - mutzaki (09/15/2015) [-]
Pretty sure your foreskin wasn't the issue, m8. Also, mild phimosis is easily treated without full-on circumcision. Sometimes you can even do it without surgical aid.
Reply
0
User avatar #336 to #334 - prycebear (09/15/2015) [-]
The nhs wouldnt pay for anything else, it was either that or nothing.
Regret not just saving up and getting somin else done but oh well
Reply
+1
User avatar #342 to #336 - mutzaki (09/15/2015) [-]
Ah, sorry to bring it up then. Oh, well, far from the worst thing in the world.
Reply
+1
User avatar #344 to #342 - prycebear (09/15/2015) [-]
Dont apologise buddy, thanks though
Reply
+17
User avatar #16 to #15 - Ruspanic (09/14/2015) [-]
Ah, that sucks dude.
Makes sense, though. That sounds like it was medically necessary, unlike most circumcisions.
Reply
+1
User avatar #17 to #16 - prycebear (09/14/2015) [-]
Yeah, still wish it hadnt been done.
Few girls said it loomed awful
Reply
+12
#101 to #17 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Speaking as an american chick,
I think they look better circumcised, and a lot of my female friends agree.
It doesn't matter to me either way, but just thought I'd let you know, girls where I'm from are the opposite and don't know how to react when someone drops their pants and sees an uncircumcised penis, since it's so common here they don't know what they're looking at.
Reply
-3
#299 to #101 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
It's funny, because nowadays, it's a product of girls getting most of their experience from porn. Foreskin has actually become the majority in the US in later years, but it will probably still take a while for the American porn industry to include natural dicks.

It's not a good idea to expect real life to be like porn. That goes for everyone.
Reply
+4
User avatar #31 to #17 - jamiemsm (09/14/2015) [-]
but how does it feel compared to before?
im in the same, except it would be more correct to say skin is too small for penis for me and my doctor said it would be best for me to get cut too. but i really dont want to do that to him
Reply
+2
User avatar #135 to #31 - thegamepixel (09/15/2015) [-]
I'm curious as well, they say it's not suppossed to feel as good when masturbating, is that true? Few people have gotten it changed midway through life, so it would be interesting to know.
Reply
+1
#233 to #135 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Circumcised guy here, can confirm it makes masturbation a lot harder and less "rewarding" if you use your hands. Solution is to get off to pressure on the dick rather than the feeling of touching it so basically humping **** ...
Reply
-1
User avatar #329 to #31 - prycebear (09/15/2015) [-]
I ****** a girl for 4 hours and didnt cum, does that help?
Reply
0
User avatar #333 to #329 - jamiemsm (09/15/2015) [-]
yeah, could be good for her. but 4 hours seems a bit long. :/
Reply
-1
User avatar #335 to #333 - prycebear (09/15/2015) [-]
I got bored as well it was **** mate, there were pauses im not a machine
Reply
0
User avatar #339 to #335 - jamiemsm (09/15/2015) [-]
**** forget that, you told me you didn't cum
Reply
-2
User avatar #341 to #339 - prycebear (09/15/2015) [-]
She came a lot but I dont care about her so its all pretty sad
Reply
0
User avatar #338 to #335 - jamiemsm (09/15/2015) [-]
well atleast tell me it gave a killer organism?
Reply
0
#168 to #17 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Srs though, if you ever find yourself in the states youll have a good time with girls instead of having a weird 'eurodick'. Haha culture is funny like that.
Reply
+9
#66 to #10 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
I think it's touted these days as more of a way to keep your junk clean, stop infection and all that. Idk if that has any validity to it, but that's the sole reason I've heard. I've never heard of anyone claiming it stops masturbation, or saying, "Idk. Just cuz." Not saying you're wrong, fyi.
Reply
+1
#212 to #10 - bann (09/15/2015) [-]
I think it was just considered the "healthy" thing to do for awhile.
Reply
0
#137 to #10 - jakeattack (09/15/2015) [-]
im ******* mad about this
ill wait until stem cells can grow me a new forskin
Reply
+56
#4 - aizeinstein (09/14/2015) [-]
Then I guess muslims simply love chopping someone's head clean off.
Reply
+4
#7 to #4 - vladi (09/14/2015) [-]
Less weight to steal.
Reply
+18
User avatar #33 to #7 - captainprincess ONLINE (09/14/2015) [-]
That's blacks and gypsies
Either do your racism properly or don't bother
Reply
-3
#170 to #33 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
>gypsies
what ****** year is this.
Reply
+2
User avatar #172 to #170 - captainprincess ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
Well I mean they haven't been exterminated so it's still relevant
Reply
+27
User avatar #79 - covered (09/15/2015) [-]
"uncircumcised > circumcised"
"circumcised > uncircumcised"
either way, u gay for sayin one type of dick is better than the other
Reply
0
#93 to #79 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
> Says talking about dicks is gay
> Talks about dicks
Reply
+3
User avatar #100 to #93 - covered (09/15/2015) [-]
I didn't say talking about dicks was gay, I said saying one dick is better than the other is gay
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #79 - timmywankenobi (09/15/2015) [-]
well I;m not saying one is better but one is a violation of human rights and causes over 1000 deaths and 175 lost penises a year due to complications.
Reply
+3
User avatar #129 to #83 - dorfdorfdorf (09/15/2015) [-]
interesting how you know so much about dicks
Reply
+3
User avatar #154 to #129 - timmywankenobi (09/15/2015) [-]
I never even though about forced genital mutilation until my Jewish friends brought it up one day . I realized I couldn't the a stance on it without first educating myself on it so I did research and what I found was absolutely horrifying .
Reply
+4
User avatar #155 to #154 - dorfdorfdorf (09/15/2015) [-]
well first off, major props to you. entirely serious right now. that you had the gumption to go out and educate yourself about a topic that concerned you instead of skimming two articles is actually really good and needs to be more encouraged. for that you have earned my thumb. but i would also remind you that things like hunger or poor nutrition cause the death of 3.1 million children alone every year. and while it certainly has it's place in human rights discussions, circumcision is a relatively minor issue that should definitely be handled down the road still massive props for educating yourself
Reply
0
User avatar #157 to #155 - timmywankenobi (09/15/2015) [-]
True worlf hunger is a far bigger issue, but monsanto has spreas it's GMO seeds everywhere and they keep other seeds from growing, So basically monsanto has a strangle hold on that issue and it will only be solved when they want it to and sell the seeds a price 2nd and 3rd world farmer can afford. (which is never cause they are greedy )
Reply
0
User avatar #158 to #157 - timmywankenobi (09/15/2015) [-]
world hunger
Reply
0
#176 to #157 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
bruh, we just gotta GMO stronger **** than monsanto. Let the gene games begin! Seriously though, how does one even monopolize a product that multiplies after using it? Could someone not buy seeds, grow some **** , then sell the extra to poorfags for quick cash.
Reply
0
User avatar #178 to #176 - timmywankenobi (09/15/2015) [-]
patented seeds if they find them in your field they sue you into the ground and take your farm. there are several documentaries on it.
Reply
0
User avatar #160 to #157 - dorfdorfdorf (09/15/2015) [-]
and there i must cede, for i have not read that much into the issues causing world hunger. carry on, my educated son
Reply
0
#266 to #155 - vymastenaochechula (09/15/2015) [-]
the difference is world hunger is hard to solve and needs cooperation and lot of work, genital mutilation on the other hand is easy to solve just by not ******* doing it
Reply
0
User avatar #267 to #266 - dorfdorfdorf (09/15/2015) [-]
a valid point
Reply
+1
User avatar #86 to #83 - covered (09/15/2015) [-]
damn, that tru? that's really unfortunate, I'm glad I was not in that situation. tbh I've never really cared about other dicks except my own
Reply
0
User avatar #88 to #86 - timmywankenobi (09/15/2015) [-]
only 125-220 deaths a year are in the western world the rest are in 2nd and 3rd world countries.
Reply
-1
User avatar #89 to #88 - covered (09/15/2015) [-]
bless all the lives and/or penises lost in the war with foreskin
Reply
-1
User avatar #117 to #89 - timmywankenobi (09/15/2015) [-]
War on foreskin.
Reply
+43
#27 - Jeff C (09/14/2015) [-]
Not a jew, still circumcised. I get the whole "non-consensual" argument but tbh I don't mind it. It may because I don't like dick in general but uncircumcised dicks look disgusting as **** , I don't have to physically lift my foreskin and clean myself, and most girls I know think uncircumcised is weird. Albeit they're American women, I'm sure places where it's not as common don't care as much or it may flat out be the opposite, but at least for me I am thankful to have been "mutilated".
Reply
-11
#64 to #27 - inergio (09/15/2015) [-]
Americuts trying it again. Don´t know what the **** are you talking about, both cut and uncut looks same while erect. Only cut is 2 colored really disgusting and in desperate need of lotion. You wash both types same way, so don´t even try with smegma stuff again.

Reply
+3
User avatar #141 to #64 - damping (09/15/2015) [-]
Insecure about your disgusting, crusty penis? How the hell would you know that circumcised penises are in dire need of lotion? Exactly how many dicks have you touched?
Reply
0
User avatar #320 to #64 - payseht ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
>Same stance
>Different wording
>11 thumbs up VS your 9 thumbs down
Maybe if you didn't respond like a dick and gave them fuel to believe you really were insecure, some causes wouldn't be where they are but where they should.
We could cut our dicks any day we'd like. It's harder to regrow a foreskin and possibly neigh impossible to undo the damage, so possibly think it's not in your best interest to attack them because they will get really defensive about it and you're helping nobody...
Reply
+9
User avatar #53 to #27 - carlonord (09/14/2015) [-]
Well of course you're going to be ok with it, you have no idea what it would be like to be the other way. I'll tell you this, the cleaning thing is a myth unless you put things in there, otherwise the only reason for washing there is for prevention and smells, and it's not difficult in the slightest. Plus, I have no need for lotion, or worry about the more sensitive parts getting dirty because they're covered and sealed.

Alien pod penis > Mushroom

You gain nothing with circumcision aside from maybe looks, but that's subjective. And of course the difficulty masturbating, maybe that's why the middle east is always so damn pissed off and rapey, maybe that's why they screw goats!
Reply
+3
#159 to #53 - Jeff C (09/15/2015) [-]
I'm saying its mostly subjective. You have no frame of reference for what it's like either, I have literally no idea what you mean by lotion, masturbating is no effort, and my dick doesn't get tired because I take a shower every day and don't dip it in mud lol. Really the only difference is looks, I guess, so is it pointless? Yes. Am I worse off? 3000% not. People on either side just don't want to feel insecure about their dick
Reply
+4
#223 to #159 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
>People on either side just don't want to feel insecure about their dick
Todays comments in a nutshell. Dicks are dicks, and a little snip don't matter, benifits=detriments and all are pretty minor. It's the culture thing that really matters.
Reply
-1
User avatar #162 to #159 - carlonord (09/15/2015) [-]
Well of course the whole thing is subjective, I was stating a thought that I had thinking that when I'm swimming in mud, I don't have to worry about it getting in somewhere unpleasant because the skin is surprisingly good at keeping nasty things out. And yes I have swam in mud. Worse off? Idk, my side would say yes. In your opinion? I suppose not if you don't swim in nasty **** .
Reply
+2
User avatar #109 to #53 - relvel (09/15/2015) [-]
It doesn't look like an alien pod. It looks like a blowfly popping out of your skin.
Reply
+7
User avatar #114 to #109 - carlonord (09/15/2015) [-]
... you should get that checked out.
Reply
0
#218 to #53 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
>smells
that's all i needed to hear.
Reply
+8
#35 to #27 - anon (09/14/2015) [-]
agreed. same here. now we wait for the circle jerk to come in and thumb us down for being okay with our circumcisions. im pretty sure the whole reason the FJ circle jerk about the subject is against it, is become some one told them it reduced the pleasure of the sex they'll never get.
Reply
+11
User avatar #48 to #27 - theflamingbrownie (09/14/2015) [-]
Something tells me that the reason you don't mind being "mutilated" is due the fact that you have no frame of reference. Unless yours is one of the rarer cases where you were circumcised at a later age (youch), I doubt you would retain this stance if you had lived WITH foreskin before losing it.
Reply
+5
#60 to #48 - anon (09/14/2015) [-]
Vice versa for you too
Reply
+3
#76 to #27 - dakkadakka (09/15/2015) [-]
Oy vey
Reply
+14
#41 to #27 - sesshii (09/14/2015) [-]
The "look disgusting part" is cultural. Women in scandinavia think the cut penis looks mutilated.
The scar and sudden color change is a turn off by most women.
Imagine a pussy without it's lips. That kinda disgusting.

To be thankful to have been "mutilated" doesn't make sense. No intact man say "i wish i was cut as a child". 99% of intact men doesn't cut themselves later in life, and do so for different reasons, it's only because it scares the crap out of them to cut away such a sensitive body part.

In other words: If you were intact, you would perish the thought of removing your foreskin.
Reply
+1
#150 to #41 - Jeff C (09/15/2015) [-]
That may be so from your point, but likewise you have no frame of reference for what I feel. A lot of the **** I see above, color change/lotion(???)/difficulty masturbating, etc just doesn't factor into my life lol. I don't really have a pronounced change in pigment and all the other **** I genuinely have no clue what you're even talking about. Really what it comes to is culture, I'm not sure why it's popular for Americans to circumcise but hey I've lost literally nothing but the tip.
Reply
+3
#174 to #150 - sesshii (09/15/2015) [-]
"but likewise you have no frame of reference for what I feel."
I can read people's feelings after circumcising themselves at adult age. They regret it almost always.
They experience pain for 1-2 months that pain meds can barely do anything about. Wearing pants hurts, peeing hurts, can't have any sexual contact for a long time, can't have sexual release etc. But this is only 2 months of a presumably very long life-span.
The after effects, such as reduced feeling, is shown in about 9/10 of those who circumcise at later age.

"A lot of the **** I see above, color change/lotion(???)/difficulty masturbating, etc just doesn't factor into my life lol."
Good for you, you are lucky. There are unfortunately not many who are lucky. You have to put into consideration of those who have had a butchered circumcision, losing parts or the entire penis. Inability of seeing sensation during masturbation or sex.
All we are saying is: Don't do this towards children, the demerits are too great.

"Really what it comes to is culture, I'm not sure why it's popular for Americans to circumcise but hey I've lost literally nothing but the tip."
It's done in the US because Dr. Kellogg(yes the guy who made the breakfast cereal) thought masturbation was jucky and said to the public that it would prevent boys from masturbating. This didn't prevent boy's from masturbation.
That's it. Then docktors later said it was hazardous and should be a practice to hold off for the boys later in life because of the complications that could occure.
Then the doctors who were pro-circ banded together and said it could prevent headaches and mental deceases. This, ofcourse proved to be false.

Then we have today. Where a handful of doctors said it reduced the chance of infection.
The studies against this at the time was too inconclusive to make a decision on the matter. Later on, we found out that infants who are circumcised are almost 100% likely to get UTI's during their infant stage due to a open flesh wound that is dowsed in urine several times a day, causing sudden crying of pain which causes annoyance in parents who are trying to sleep.
And then there is the issue of pills that fixes infection, making the argument invalid.
"Circumcision protects against STI's" is also a stupid argument.
If i say to any rational human being: Can i circumcise myself and walk to the red light district and **** every whore bareback and be safe? then the answer is a blatant NO.
Condoms fix that issue.

"just the tip".
The foreskin has 20k nerve endings.
The female clitoris has about 8k.
The head of the penis has about 6k.
The foreskin is 3 times more sensitive than the head of the penis, on an intact male.
Cut men have reduced sensitivity from an extra layer of skin that blocks the existing nerve endings from working properly.
Let that sink in.

TL;DR Cutting is bad n' **** yo
Reply
+4
#210 to #174 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Except a 2014 bigass meta-review found far more benefits than risks. Most complications occur in ****** conditions with inexperienced surgeons. The STI thing is legitimate even though it's not 100%. Condoms arent either, if you wear that into the red-light district and bang every hooker, you still will probably catch something. But you still wear them, because lower risk of infection is a good thing it turns out. UTIs aren't inevitable with proper hygiene and circumcised males are at a lower risk for them for the rest of their lives. Plus there is the prophylactic thing. Also on your nerve ending spiel premature ejac is just as common as erectile dysfunction so that's a non-issue. In all honesty altering the tiny sheath is pretty inconsequential with as many benefits as detriments. Sure it sounds scary and like mutilation to those who don't have it, and people get really defensive over their junk and sexual stuff in general, but overall it's really not life-changing either way. I mean ya it sucks as an adult, but as a little-ass kid it doesn't; the dick is tiny and puberty is far off. Plus as a kid you save yourself a dick-based identity crises if you have to later on. No reason to be weird and fear-mongering about it. Honestly you'll have the best time if your dick looks like your culture says it's supposed to, otherwise girls will be wtf every time. Im cut, your not, who cares.
Reply
+1
#241 to #210 - sesshii (09/15/2015) [-]
"Except a 2014 bigass meta-review found far more benefits than risks."
I would like to see this. I would read the papers.
"Most complications occur in ****** conditions with inexperienced surgeons."
Most complications happen later in life when they need to do a correctional surgery because the wound didn't heal as good as it was hoped for.
"The STI thing is legitimate even though it's not 100%."
It's not. If this is proven in the meta-review you spoke of, id' like to see it.
"Condoms arent either, if you wear that into the red-light district and bang every hooker, you still will probably catch something."
Nothing lethal/deadly or that will make me sterile or unable to have sex later.
Condoms will reduce the chance of getting most STI's by 50-100% depending on the disease.
"UTIs aren't inevitable with proper hygiene and circumcised males are at a lower risk for them for the rest of their lives."
There is an argument in some places in Africa that FGM reduces the chance of UTI's.
The pill that works for women, that takes 5-7 days to clear up your body, works for men too. And women are hundreds of times more likely to get UTI's than men, yet this is apparently not an argument for FGM in the west.
"Also on your nerve ending spiel premature ejac is just as common as erectile dysfunction so that's a non-issue."
This doesn't have anything to do with circumcision.
PE and ED can be fixed via medicine or training.
Lost nerve cells can't be regrown at the current time.
"In all honesty altering the tiny sheath is pretty inconsequential with as many benefits as detriments."
The benefits that stay today is: Reduced chance of UTI's and STI's. Reduced chance of penile cancer.
UTI's are fixed with a pill.
STI's can be fixed with condoms and not being an idiot.
Penile cancer is shown to be reduced by 1%.
But this isn't good enough of an argument, as a man is 1000 times more likely to get breast cancer as they are to get penile cancer.
Meanwhile, approx 10/100 cut boys will get severe problems with his penis.
such as: Inability of feeling anything, unable to enjoy masturbation without lube.
30/100 will have a much reduced feeling from masturbation and make it feel bland. Making the best part of masturbation the orgasm itself, and not the entire ride.
Within these 40/100 men, ED will be a problem showing up much more often than in intact men.
"Plus as a kid you save yourself a dick-based identity crises if you have to later on."
Or don't cut at all.
The only identity crisis that is the problem is that of the cut men who see that there is not scar on the intact man's penis.
"No reason to be weird and fear-mongering about it. Honestly you'll have the best time if your dick looks like your culture says it's supposed to, otherwise girls will be wtf every time. Im cut, your not, who cares."
My culture doesn't say what my penis should look like.
Nature does, a culture that promotes circumcision denies nature.
Girls in countries with intact men go wtf when they see a cut man.
In interview recently in Norway when they were talking about making circumcision legal, the responses was "eww" and "idunno" for the most part.

The entire issue is silly. If the culture likes circumcision, that OK, just don't do it children who cannot consent.
Reply
0
#319 to #241 - justtocomment (09/15/2015) [-]
www.m.webmd.com/men/news/20040202/adult-circumcision-affects-sexual-performance
www.vice.com/read/men-explain-why-they-were-circumcised-as-adults-330
www.circinfo.net/men_circumcised_as_adults_tell_it_as_it_is.html
It's actually a pretty common sentiment in surveys, research, and individual anecdotally reported events.
Really, the anti-circumcision lobby only has a handful of specific horror stories and a general fear-mongering epitaph of "cutting your dick apart" to stand on.
Reply
0
User avatar #262 to #241 - ninjaspartan (09/15/2015) [-]
You end your debate a lot with "children who cannot consent" yet they can't consent to a lot of things, because, well, they're children. They don't have the consent of what name they choose or what parents raise them for about 18 years either, yet you see children have more issues with that than when it comes to life changing procedures like circumcision. Ask any kid and I'm sure none of them will give you the answer "I don't like my penis." None of them have a problem with it, only uncut adults seem to. Everybody who was raised with their penis one way from birth likes their penis the way it is and will never consider changing it after they grow up, because they have no point of reference for what the other kind of penis feels like. That's why it's done when they're born, because even parents wouldn't do it any later knowing that their children would be fully conscious of it, unlike memories of birth which no one has. It's no more mutilation than cutting the ambilical cord or fixing a cleft lip, the only difference is a competent surgeon. The only reason people cry "mutilation" is because it's become known as an unnecessary operation, and the necessity of it certainly is a completely different issue, but circumcision existed to be done at birth for children to not have to experience it later in life when it's too late to make the decision if they have to without the pain.
Reply
+1
User avatar #280 to #262 - markipliergame (09/15/2015) [-]
That's completely different, their name isn't permanent physical damage to their body like circumcision is.
Reply
0
#325 to #262 - sesshii (09/15/2015) [-]
"You end your debate a lot with "children who cannot consent" yet they can't consent to a lot of things, because, well, they're children."
Switching their diapers, giving them shots, showing food down their throats.
These things are a necessity, cutting off 60% of the skin of the penis for cosmetic changes that can have dire consequences as i mentioned earlier, is too great to be a practice on children who cannot consent, if done on adults, the practice is basically without demerits
You don't even know if the child would like it as an adult, which many men stand forward and speak up against later in life.
There is also the issue of 130 infant boys who die each year. These deaths could have been prevented by just waiting until they reach mature age.
There is also the issue of sexism, women get protection from the slightest level of FGM, despite most FGM's being less intrusive as the common circumcision, they are outright banned simply for it being for women. Men do not receive the same respect.
"None of them have a problem with it, only uncut adults seem to."
Seem to is an assumption. Most people who have a problem with it is cut males. Just watch some of these: www.youtube.com/user/Bonobo3D/videos you will see the difference on those who wear the "i love my foreskin" T-shirt and those who wear pants with a bloody spot on their crouch.

"That's why it's done when they're born, because even parents wouldn't do it any later knowing that their children would be fully conscious of it, unlike memories of birth which no one has."
The children has the capacity of short-term memories like monkeys before their brain has developed long-term memories, trauma can still change their brains, which the pain of circumcision does.
So the entire "it's a cultural thing" part rests entirely on it's ability to circumcise their infants.
Meaning if you outlawed circumcision to be illegal towards children below the age of 18, then the entire culture would die.

"It's no more mutilation than cutting the ambilical cord or fixing a cleft lip, the only difference is a competent surgeon."
The umbilical cord is a thing that will be naturally separated from the baby.
a cleft lip is a birth defect, a foreskin is not, every mammal has it.

"The only reason people cry "mutilation" is because it's become known as an unnecessary operation, and the necessity of it certainly is a completely different issue, but circumcision existed to be done at birth for children to not have to experience it later in life when it's too late to make the decision if they have to without the pain."
People protest because it's immoral. Some have negative effects from being cut as a child, and they complain. Other people, including intact men, support them because they have empathy.

It exists today because Dr Kellogg thought masturbation was yucky. If he didn't people would most likely not cut their children today.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harvey_Kellogg#Masturbation_prevention
Reply
0
User avatar #332 to #325 - ninjaspartan (09/15/2015) [-]
It's funny too, because if it wasn't made legal to be done at birth, then it wouldn't exist at all anymore because no one would have a cut penis anymore. That's basically all its ever done, and you'd be hard pressed to find a guy who circumcised himself later in life for anything less than necessary medical purposes. I watched some of those videos and it's interesting to see children who are exposed to the subject form an opinion on it. It showed me how very impressionable they are when recieving information from certain sources, for example the one ginger child whose mother didn't know what circumcision was until after she had her first child. Although I couldn't find any videos with any grown cut men protesting, you might have to point them out because I'm not searching through and watching every single one of those videos to find it.

So, what about men who regret not being circumcised at birth? There's a certain benefit for growing up with a circumcised penis that some men recognize, the same way it shapes a mans life with many things that he grows up with. When a man can finally think for himself, he may regret that he wasn't cut at birth and that may change everything about his penis. A penis that grows into a circumcised sleeve is vastly different from a freshly circumcised, fully grown penis after all. So what do you do about that mans right to have him circumcised at birth if he wants? Nothing, you can't go back in time for him, he'll never have that kind of penis, and he'll never be able to decide that for himself. Some things you just can't compromise on. Although those are few and far between, usually just guys who have to be circumcised for medical reasons, because like I said, few men actually want to change their penis when they grow up.
Reply
0
#343 to #332 - sesshii (09/15/2015) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZKTLN-xINA
Here is a video of a man who speak up against it.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2CwHbCDiAU
Here's one of a man who regrets him cutting himself at a higher age because he didn't know any better. He recognizes that he has lost a lot of the natural pleasure that he was born with.

"it's interesting to see children who are exposed to the subject form an opinion on it."
I agree here, i think you should present facts and have children make up their own mind. Selling them the finished product... Is not BAD, but it could be better.

"So, what about men who regret not being circumcised at birth?"
Where are these people?

"There's a certain benefit for growing up with a circumcised penis that some men recognize, the same way it shapes a mans life with many things that he grows up with."
How does it "shape a mans life"?
"When a man can finally think for himself, he may regret that he wasn't cut at birth and that may change everything about his penis."
Again, where are these people? "regret having it not been done to them at young age doesn't make sense. Do it as an adult.

"A penis that grows into a circumcised sleeve is vastly different from a freshly circumcised, fully grown penis after all."
No, it takes about 2 years for the penis to be done making the extra skin cells to protect the head of the penis, after that they are the same.

"So what do you do about that mans right to have him circumcised at birth if he wants? Nothing, you can't go back in time for him, he'll never have that kind of penis, and he'll never be able to decide that for himself."
He can't wish for a circumcision because the child doesn't want a circumcision.
You make no sense at the moment.

"Some things you just can't compromise on. Although those are few and far between, usually just guys who have to be circumcised for medical reasons, because like I said, few men actually want to change their penis when they grow up."
Yes, let's compromise on the fact that it's immoral to do this to those who cannot consent, that it's also sexist that women get this protection, but not men, even though most FGM's are less invasive as the common MGM.

"Although those are few and far between, usually just guys who have to be circumcised for medical reasons, because like I said, few men actually want to change their penis when they grow up."
The reason why countries who have it as a taboo has 1% of cut male population is because of medical reasons. There are no medical association in the world who thinks it has medical benefits. It's benefits are a myth that die hard.
www.intactamerica.org/resources/decision
Read nr 1 there.
Reply
0
User avatar #349 to #343 - ninjaspartan (09/16/2015) [-]
Well, a child doesn't want a needle stuck in him either for a vaccine. Not every child in the world needs one but is recommended that everyone gets one. Why isn't the consent of the child questioned there? Just because it has medical benefits? I find it hard to accept that the fine line between what parents know best and what's abhorrent and unnecessary is comfirmed medical benefits. Why is it that women have the freedom to abort their child without consent yet suddenly they have no right to make a decision for their ongoing life thereafter? Hypocracy at its finest.

A woman's circumcision is actually far more intrusive, and it's frankly a bit silly to measure that by the number of nerves lost when a female circumcision cuts off the labia, the clitoris, and sows the vagina up in most countries until the woman is of a certain age where it's torn back open. I don't know about you, but that's miles worse than a slight reshaping of a penis, I don't care how many more nerve endings a woman still has.

I know a guy that I used to be neighbors with a few years back talking about regretting not being circumcised as an infant. He in particular happened to get recurring infections because of it, where he would peel the foreskin back and it would stick so badly that the head of his penis would always bleed, and it wouldn't go away. Eventually he had to get circumcised, and he wished it had happened when he was a child before the foreskin actually attached because his penis felt like it had shrunk and it hadn't looked the same as other circumcised penises he saw. Not as if I could introduce you to him, but there's actually a poster here that says almost the same thing about himself:

>>#11

So yeah, they exist. Again, few and far between, and usually for medical purposes, but they exist.
Reply
0
#351 to #349 - sesshii (09/16/2015) [-]
"Well, a child doesn't want a needle stuck in him either for a vaccine."
It's a medical necessity.
"Not every child in the world needs one but is recommended that everyone gets one."
In order for a country to be considered "immune" to a disease, then 95% of all the citizens will have to be vaccinated to that disease, meaning 5% can go without vaccination just fine.

"I find it hard to accept that the fine line between what parents know best and what's abhorrent and unnecessary is comfirmed medical benefits."
No. Science has proven the consequences of circumcision, parent's opinion is irrelevant in this matter.

"Why is it that women have the freedom to abort their child without consent yet suddenly they have no right to make a decision for their ongoing life thereafter? Hypocracy at its finest."
So she should be allowed to cut off a child's arm?

"A woman's circumcision is actually far more intrusive, and it's frankly a bit silly to measure that by the number of nerves lost when a female circumcision cuts off the labia, the clitoris, and sows the vagina up in most countries until the woman is of a certain age where it's torn back open. I don't know about you, but that's miles worse than a slight reshaping of a penis, I don't care how many more nerve endings a woman still has."
There are 4 types of FGM. Only 1 of them is worse than the common male circumcision.
From the lowest form: Pricking the clitoris with a needle. May cause infection, but that's about it. The body recovers from this.
3rd on the list is the removal of the hood of the clitoris, this is the female equivalent of the male circumcision but is less intrusive as it contains less nerve endings and the loss is not as great as the male.
2nd is the most common one. The removal of partial removal of the clitoris and it's foreskin, still counting nerve endings, it's still less than the foreskin in males.
1st is the worst type. The removal of clitoris+foreskin and removal of both labia and sewing the vagina shut, making it look like the hole of a blow-up doll.

"I know a guy that I used to be neighbors with a few years back talking about regretting not being circumcised as an infant. He in particular happened to get recurring infections because of it, where he would peel the foreskin back and it would stick so badly that the head of his penis would always bleed, and it wouldn't go away. Eventually he had to get circumcised, and he wished it had happened when he was a child before the foreskin actually attached because his penis felt like it had shrunk and it hadn't looked the same as other circumcised penises he saw. Not as if I could introduce you to him, but there's actually a poster here that says almost the same thing about himself:

Nr 11 say he regrets it and would hope to have his problem solved another way.
"regret not having it done at a young age" is a wrong phrase. "wish it had been done at a young age" might be more suitable. But the argument is stupid, he is free to do it now, no one is forcing him not to. If he is afraid of the 1-2 months of pain, at least it isn't done towards children.
There is also the argument of the 130 babies that die every year. Is his "fear of pain" more important than those lives? This is in America btw, in high quality hospitals.
Reply
0
User avatar #353 to #351 - ninjaspartan (09/16/2015) [-]
I think science has proven both sides of the argument to be a bit varying. And at best it proves that the foreskin doesn't come with the diseases and difficulties people say they do. But you don't need science to prove whether or not a doctor messes up. Thing is, that'd be the doctors fault, not the idea of operation itself. Science has also proven that plenty (and I'm not gonna throw a random statistic like I know) of circumcisions have not actually caused problems throughout the life of a male when performed correctly. I can confidently say as a circumcised male myself that I've never ever had any problems with it, and neither have my friends. I mean, it would be a worldwide epidemic that almost every circumcised male would have problems with if it actually caused as many issues as people said it did, wouldn't it? But you don't see too many circumcised men saying that unless they've been indoctrinated somehow into that belief. It would be nice to see what kind of study shows statistics of 130 infants dying every year in America because of circumcision, because of that were the case I'm more than positive it would be banned by now. That's too big a number to let slide. Hell, even one infant dying via circumcision is enough to get on the news. Also, how does that happen? Death by snipping of loose skin? That doesn't make any sense to me.

And an arm is much different than a piece of skin. I don't pick coffee mugs up with my penis, lasts time I checked, and despite being cut I can still feel plenty of pleasure, so frankly, circumcision is not nearly as abhorrent as abortion nor will it ever be. But the hypocrisy is still there.

Reply
0
#354 to #353 - sesshii (09/16/2015) [-]
"I think science has proven both sides of the argument to be a bit varying."
There is no medical association that recommends routine circumcision because almost every association agree that circumcision has no health benefits.
"But you don't need science to prove whether or not a doctor messes up."
If you look at a whole lot of different penises, you will see that some have visible blood-veins and some don't.
When cutting the foreskin, it's impossible to know how the penis formed itself during pregnancy. This is why many children die, loose their penises, become in danger of loosing their lives by loosing too much blood, and there is very little doctors can do.
Does this seem safe to you?
www.circinfo.org/USA_deaths.html

"I can confidently say as a circumcised male myself that I've never ever had any problems with it, and neither have my friends."
Good for you and your friend. You are lucky, i'm just thinking of those who've had no voice and feel the demerits from the procedure. They have a voice, and it should be outlawed until they reach maturity.

"I mean, it would be a worldwide epidemic that almost every circumcised male would have problems with if it actually caused as many issues as people said it did, wouldn't it?"
Men are proud creatures, if we said we lack performance in the sex-life, many would feel less of a man. This, and the fact that many haven't heard of it before, and they think not feeling much from sex is a natural thing. Go to support groups for circumcised men and you'll find services and products to help them cope with it.

Reasons why children die: www.circumstitions.com/death.html

The argument goes as if an arm has good uses as well as a foreskin, the there is no reason to remove it.
Reply
0
User avatar #356 to #354 - ninjaspartan (09/16/2015) [-]
Well there's another end to that spectrum of demerit, for the circumcised male as well. It's constantly referred to as "mutilation" as if it's so abnormal. Yes, it can really hurt a man's pride to think their manhood was done an injustice, even for those as "lucky" as me. But we don't want to think of it as something missing unlike a lot of people who actually have problems. We don't want to feel bad for ourselves because some group of human rights activists said the things that we grew up with were wrong. Frankly I'm sick of all the demonization that subjects like this get. Now a days being a white, circumcised, religious male in today's society is worse than anything else, and the last thing I need to feel bad about is my penis and what was done to it when I shouldn't feel bad about it at all. But if I have to feel bad about it happening others then I will, and I'm not up for that unless I have it straight from the horses mouth. I'm not one to just believe any kind of document on the internet for what it's stating, but if I end up hearing that from a doctor firsthand then I can be sure there's an injustice being done to infant boys everywhere and I can be more clear on this subject. I'm not saying it isn't wrong for what it could be, but the entire culture would turn upside down if it were more common knowledge that circumcision really kills, and that's a lot for people to swallow, because it states way more for everybody than just infant children.
Reply
0
User avatar #358 to #356 - lucky (09/16/2015) [-]
Neat, all those words and my mention is in quotes.
Reply
0
#357 to #356 - sesshii (09/16/2015) [-]
I don't think you listen.

I say that those who have had negative experiences with this could have been averted had we set a legal age at 18.

www.academia.edu/6394940/Lost_Boys_An_Estimate_of_U.S._Circumcision-Related_Infant_Deaths
Here is a source made by Academia. Note that the numbers are slightly different, this is because the number of deaths change every year.

"Well there's another end to that spectrum of demerit, for the circumcised male as well. It's constantly referred to as "mutilation" as if it's so abnormal."
It is. Don't claim to be a victim of truth.

"But we don't want to think of it as something missing unlike a lot of people who actually have problems."
If you don't want to, then it's no problems then. You are in charge of your emotions.
And if you do feel something, it means that intactivism works.
The "actual problems" are an entirely different matter.

"human rights activists..."
Yes because human rights are such a bad thing.

"Now a days being a white, circumcised, religious male in today's society is worse than anything else"
Yes, today's culture is very anti-white, we are blamed for most of the world's problems on the basis of a dark history that everyone has.

"and the last thing I need to feel bad about is my penis and what was done to it when I shouldn't feel bad about it at all."
If you feel that intactivists have tried to make you feel bad for being circumcised, then I'm sorry.
That is not the message. If anything, we are angry at doctors who do this practice, who knows it's wrong but likes the $$$ it brings in. If doctors just turned their backs, we wouldn't even need to outlaw it.

"But if I have to feel bad about it happening others then I will, and I'm not up for that unless I have it straight from the horses mouth. I'm not one to just believe any kind of document on the internet for what it's stating, but if I end up hearing that from a doctor firsthand then I can be sure there's an injustice being done to infant boys everywhere and I can be more clear on this subject."
www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
Here is a website owned and run by doctors who oppose the practice.
It's not flashy, but they are physicians, not IT personnel.

"I'm not saying it isn't wrong for what it could be, but the entire culture would turn upside down if it were more common knowledge that circumcision really kills, and that's a lot for people to swallow, because it states way more for everybody than just infant children."
The culture wouldn't change at all. It won't even be "upside down".
The change would only be reversed as the movement started by Kellogg's.

Physicians who are about to circumcise boys, are forced to tell the parents of risks, as infections, severe bleeding and in rare cases death and both parents have sign for this if he/she is to do the procedure.
Reply
+1
#186 to #174 - Jeff C (09/15/2015) [-]
Myeh, maybe I'm a lucky one and I don't have the downsides but I honestly give zero thought into the fact that I'm circumcised. I would imagine it'd be super painful to do later in life, but that sounds like a real personal problem. I could have been born like this and I'd never know, and I don't know anyone who has suffered negatively by being circumcised
Reply
+1
#245 to #186 - sesshii (09/15/2015) [-]
It's good to hear that you are doing fine, reading the forums for cut men with problems is a bit disheartening.

"I could have been born like this and I'd never know"
You'd most likely have to live far away from civilization or internet not to cross information about it.
"and I don't know anyone who has suffered negatively by being circumcised"
It's a very personal issue, and many men are afraid to say out that they have problems with their penises. On intactivist forums, there are men in the 60's who have lived 50 years feeling it was something wrong with them before coming out about their issue.
There are men who don't have a penis because the doctor cut a blood-vessel and cut off the penis's blood supply, this still happens today in American hospitals.
Every year there are 130 babies dying due to being cut in America.
This could have been you or me. And luckily not.

If America or the west wants to do this as a cultural thing, be my guest. Just don't do it to children.
Reply
+12
User avatar #44 to #27 - payseht ONLINE (09/14/2015) [-]
it's true. Here, women think cut dicks are disgusting. It's really interesting to see.
Personally, I'm against it because it's unnecessary. Like a baby with pierced ears, I kind of have something against deciding a semi-permanent cosmetic thing before they're old enough. A vaccine is a vaccine, for example, but deciding on their behalf for something like this just rubs me the wrong way.
Glad people are contempt with it, though... it's kind of sad when they justify it with the opinions of women in their culture. First of all, your body, not theirs. Second, it's considered disgusting in other cultures so the only difference is what's the majority.
Personal opinion, cut dicks look good, uncut ones look healthy. I'd say it's a matter of preference, but I doubt there are many guys out there who, given the option, would choose to cut their dicks.
Reply
0
#92 to #44 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Unless they had a medical reason to, like the foreskin won't retract.

I'm inclined to believe you on the cutting a baby without its consent matter. But what do you think about parents who do it to spare the kid later in life? Like if they know he's going to have phimosis?
Reply
0
User avatar #293 to #92 - payseht ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
Depending on what the odds of that happening are. If it's for a medical issue or it's deformed, cut that suckered up, but the way I see it it's done more out of tradition and not this backhanded excuse people came up with to reason away there isn't really a reason for it to be this wide spread.
Reply
+16
User avatar #36 - willindor ONLINE (09/14/2015) [-]
Why does a post about circumcision always result in so much dick talk that the gay board will become jealous?
Reply
+3
User avatar #113 to #36 - aizeinstein (09/15/2015) [-]
We are very concerned for the well being of our dicks. Whether short or long, it's a companion lifelong.
Reply
+4
User avatar #68 to #36 - heartlessrobot (09/15/2015) [-]
You got a problem with talking about dicks, son?
Reply
+5
#39 to #36 - sacrilegious (09/14/2015) [-]
Because circumcision happens to dicks?
Reply
+5
User avatar #18 - TheBobby (09/14/2015) [-]
I was circumcised at birth. It's kinda weird to think that my dick isn't "natural" because its just always been this way.
Reply
+3
User avatar #25 - anygoodnames (09/14/2015) [-]
There's some health stuff to it too, if I'm not mistaken.
Reply
0
User avatar #28 to #25 - Darianvincent (09/14/2015) [-]
Well yeah no more dick cheese or phimosis I believe, but I wish I would of had a say in my foreskin being stolen by shifty jew doctors. GIVE IT BACK KIKES RACE WAR NOW
Reply
+4
#45 to #28 - sesshii (09/14/2015) [-]
"dick cheese" AKA smegma, is something that only happens to: Children who haven't entered puberty and adults who never washes their penises. Like... Never. Once every 2nd week will prevent smegma, if you don't do it for 6 months, the penis will make smegma because:
It's sterile, it protects you against bacteria.
Women get this too, but you don't hear many complain about that.

Washing it takes 5 secs. Every shower. Doesn't make you hard unless you are a teenager raging with hormones or you suddenly starts jerking off.
Reply
+7
User avatar #29 to #28 - ronyx (09/14/2015) [-]
It's not hard to wash your dick you know.
Reply
+2
User avatar #30 to #29 - Darianvincent (09/14/2015) [-]
:^) But washing it makes it hard. Yeah I know I'm just saying why somebody would remove it.
Reply
+3
User avatar #56 to #25 - guanyu (09/14/2015) [-]
They say the same thing about snake wine.
Reply
+4
User avatar #14 - prycebear (09/14/2015) [-]
Tfw circumcised at 18.....
Reply
0
User avatar #104 to #14 - rebornpotato (09/15/2015) [-]
why.
Reply
0
User avatar #321 to #14 - payseht ONLINE (09/15/2015) [-]
>Why?
>What differences, if any, did you notice
>Any pros and cons you could throw our way
Reply
0
User avatar #330 to #321 - prycebear (09/15/2015) [-]
>Tight foreskin and std's that became infected Happy you asked?
>Takes ages to cum also have to wear tight underwear to gym.
>You can **** a girl for hours and not cum, bot a pro and con
Reply
+1
User avatar #20 to #14 - auronexplains (09/14/2015) [-]
wut
Reply
+1
User avatar #21 to #20 - prycebear (09/14/2015) [-]
Wut
Reply
+1
User avatar #22 to #21 - tkich (09/14/2015) [-]
wut
Reply
+1
User avatar #23 to #22 - prycebear (09/14/2015) [-]
wut
Reply
0
User avatar #24 to #23 - yudodat ONLINE (09/14/2015) [-]
Project Almanac What Scene
Reply
+9
#19 - xxxos (09/14/2015) [-]
considering how during that ceremony rabbis put cut baby penis in their mouth to suck the blood, i consider them a vampire paedophile sadists
Reply
+3
#285 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
>I'm cut
>mfw people say "HUR, WELL YOUR FORESKIN HAS LIKE THOUSANDS OF NERVE ENDINGS"
>mfw they think this actually matters
>mfw I can still feel pleasure from my dick
>mfw that is the stupidest ******* argument people make for not cutting
I'm not gonna cut my kid because it makes so many people ******* butt bothered
Reply
+3
User avatar #283 - mastershakere (09/15/2015) [-]
The really sad thing about circumcision is that it can lead to some ill effects on your genitilias health especially since you dry out easily without the foreskin leading to some damaged skin which means if you havent been using lotion or oil its better to start
Reply
+7
#9 - Deavas (09/14/2015) [-]
because theyre ******* kikes thats why
Reply
+1
#37 to #9 - zanybruh (09/14/2015) [-]
there's a nice flash game of her. want sauce?
there's a nice flash game of her. want sauce?
Reply
+1
User avatar #50 to #37 - Deavas (09/14/2015) [-]
i have it
Reply
+1
#43 to #37 - anon (09/14/2015) [-]
why ask.
Reply
+3
#51 to #43 - zanybruh (09/14/2015) [-]
**zanybruh used "*roll picture*"**
**zanybruh rolled image**
sauce then: You need to login to view this link
Reply
+2
#270 - bwiedieter (09/15/2015) [-]
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2304793/Two-babies-stricken-HERPES-ritual-oral-blood-sucking-circumcision-New-York-City.html
RABBI EXPLAINS IMPORTANCE OF SUCKING BABY'S PENIS FOLLOWING CIRCUMCISION

TL; DW: It´s totaly cool that that guy is taking our baby´s penis in his mouth and sucking on it... it´s traditional!
Reply
+3
User avatar #107 - wilfredfanforever (09/15/2015) [-]
UNCUT. UNTAMED
Reply
+1
#289 - anon (09/15/2015) [-]
Well the jewish priests cut the foreskin off and then lick the penis clean of blood during the ceremony.
Reply
+1
User avatar #255 - AztecJew (09/15/2015) [-]
I can't say if I'd choose it if it had been a choice for me but I have no complaints with my junk and since I'm not gay I really don't give a damn about anyone else's. I think the cut/uncut argument is just stupid. There's a very small percentage of people who choose to be circumcised so I don't see why people argue it as though you could choose to put a foreskin back on.
Reply
+1
User avatar #274 to #255 - iamkagji (09/15/2015) [-]
The problem most people have with it is the fact that they do it to babies before they can consent to such a procedure.
123>
[ 359 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)