Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#286 - themasterdebater
Reply +6
(12/15/2012) [-]
shooped.
here's proof
#337 to #286 - redclover
Reply +1
(12/15/2012) [-]
...but that reply most likely wasn't in response to -52. Why would they be asking someone who says OP won't deliver where OP lives?
#316 to #286 - kingrayne
Reply +1
(12/15/2012) [-]
....what?
#323 to #316 - themasterdebater
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
see comment #306, but ignore my harassment of the other guy
#304 to #286 - rerstlos
Reply -2
(12/15/2012) [-]
last few digits are random
#299 to #286 - rerstlos
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#306 to #299 - themasterdebater
Reply -1
(12/15/2012) [-]
are you ******* retarted?
the post with the picture of the dog is a post number ending in 52, but the post replying to it is replying to a post number ending in 25. it means that whoever shooped that ****** up. ********
#307 to #306 - themasterdebater
Reply -1
(12/15/2012) [-]
even though you deleted your original comment, this one still applies to your new one
#309 to #307 - rerstlos
Reply 0
(12/15/2012) [-]
it never happened
#311 to #309 - themasterdebater
Reply -1
(12/15/2012) [-]
wut
#344 to #311 - fuckyosixtyminutes
Reply +1
(12/15/2012) [-]
What makes you think the "where at" was in response to the "OP won't deliver"?