Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
-1
#28 - mattdoggy has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #30 to #28 - xsap (04/21/2013) [-]
skin color is not the only difference between whites and blacks... our gens are totally different... blacks are sub-species and this has been proven by science many times... blacks have more testosterone than whites which makes them more aggressive and brings out their typical primate nature... whites evolved from blacks.. we all came out of Africa, an average white IQ is 100 while average black IQ is 87 (average Asian IQ is 107)
There are many books written by many scientists about this topic but most of them are banned because they promote "racism" even Charles Darwin said that we're not equal...

so.. whenever someone tells you "we're all the same we just have different color skin" they are lying or they don't know how the human gene works and have no knowledge of the human evolution is the last 200,000 years


you don't have to be racist to know we're not equal
#101 to #30 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
Many of your kind could use a middle school biology class. Science has never proven any such thing. Sub-species can't interbreed with the main in a way that would make the sterile children. This is 6th grade Biology. If you claim that whites came from blacks, how can blacks be the subspecies? The are many inconsistencies in one of the main IQ tests carried out in Africa, they asked questions about objects which would normally only be found in the western world and there were many unexplained deductions of IQ points. Charles Darwin never said such a thing and I've studied him intensively in my academic career.
#104 to #101 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
charles Darwinn has a whole book written on that subject.. i don't know what your professor thought you but you should go and do a little research.. most of his works on that are banned for "promoting racism"... there are many other books by other biologists conforming this they are all banned for the same reason... one book i can name is the selfish gene by Richard Dawkins.. its not specifically talking about whites and blacks but there is a chapter where he does conforms that blacks are less intelligent and ill fit compared to whites... we're not the same get over it...
#80 to #30 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
I really hope you are just trying to piss people off... Can't you see that not only is that scientifically inaccurate but that it can also come to no good for humanity as a whole?

This is exactly the kind of thing people in Germany were taught pre-WW2; they had "real" scientific evidence that Jews were completely distinct and inferior from Arians. "Scientists" developed all kinds of methods of proving this....

Not only can we see now that it was inaccurate, but its also clear that it can never lead to anything positive.
User avatar #81 to #80 - xsap (04/22/2013) [-]
"no good for humanity as a whole"
>implying people get a long or they ever will...
#83 to #81 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
I don't think that cynicism justifies the purposeful spread of hate.

Whats you answer for the "science" that proved Jews were a distinct and inferior race, people were completely convinced of it at the time and they had all kinds of academic publications and medical tests to prove it.
User avatar #84 to #83 - xsap (04/22/2013) [-]
hitler did nothing wrong though...
User avatar #47 to #30 - SuitUp (04/21/2013) [-]
Ok there's fundamentally quite a lot wrong with what you wrote. Firstly, the IQ system is sold as a 'this is an accurate number to guage how smart you are compared to the 100 average.' What you don't often here is that actually the system is only valid (But not really, back to this in a min.) for white males between the ages of 21 and 35. This is because of the, quite obvious, impossibility of factoring in all the variables which actually determine what we would call intelligence - quality of education, cultural exposure etc. You can't take people that have had dramatically different upbringings and exposure to materials and then try to draw conclusions about race from a score given by an IQ test.

Which brings me to IQ tests in general. The scores on IQ tests are bull. At best you could have a band system of say 'below 70' '70-120' '120+'. This is because not only do people get better at IQ tests the more they do them, but also based on what hobbies they do, what time of day it is, whether the room they're in is painted red or blue, whether they can see sunshine through a window and a thousand other arbitrary things which all conspire against a standardised system.

Next, I'm aware of some of the papers and books published which you are talking about and I can tell you that they have not been ignored or discredited because people don't like whats in them (That really isn't how the scientific community does things.) They were discreditted because each and every one had glaring flaws in sampling, testing or analysing the data which made their findings practically useless. They then tried to pedle the abused 'edgey thinkers' card often used by pseudosciences to dodge the fact that they're conducting bad science.

User avatar #49 to #47 - SuitUp (04/21/2013) [-]
Finally, it is perfectly fine to acknowledge the differences between races. What is not ok is then trying to create a hierachy based on those differences. You say that black people are a 'sub-species' yet that phrasing only really works if white peoples, oriental, asians, aboriginal etc. are all classified as 'sub-species' - similarly to different breeds of dog. There are, apart from aesthetic, well known differences in biology between different races. A few examples:

Lactose-intolerance is hugely common in oriental people due to it being a mostly European evolution to process cows milk.
Austrailian Aboriginals are more prone to alcoholism because their bodies take much longer to break down alcohol and they are not as tolerant of it.
White people are better at swimming than black people due to their lower centre of gravity.
Black people are better at running due to their higher centre of gravity.

Intelligence is however not something that we know to differ between races. It's also pretty much impossible to devise a test that would give us some useful data about it either - it's far more cost effective, economically and socially, to research which teaching methods result in better learning.
#53 to #49 - hatinonmyrolls (04/21/2013) [-]
you don't need science to see which race is superior... just look at the histoy of man kind, the Europeans have accomplished so much, they introduced mth, art, litterature, science to this world along side with Asians while Africans haven't made a single innervation in 100,000 years... even today, in america blacks and whites given the same education and the test scores of white kids are always higher then blacks, same with the SATs... 67% of all crime committed in america is committed by blacks even though they make up only 16% of the U.S population...while whites make up 76% or so... 70 something % of all high school drop outs each year are black...

and don't give me that suppressed **** ... they a long time to get their **** together and from the looks of it they never will... i don't want to even point to modern Africa because its a too easy target
User avatar #61 to #53 - semicontra (04/22/2013) [-]
If you had any idea what you were talking about, you would have been ashamed to have said any of this. Also assuming you meant to say invention you have African Americans to thank for such things as open-heart surgery, air conditioning, disposable syringes, lawn mowers, door knobs, and toilets just to name a few. You are the worst kind of person.
#82 to #61 - anonymous (04/22/2013) [-]
everything he said is right... that's the problem with funnyjunk... you people live in a fairy land where everything is fun and games and can't handle the cold hard facts given to you... and you automatically thumb the person down and pretend you won...
User avatar #85 to #82 - semicontra (04/22/2013) [-]
I'm glad you agree that in the short time that African Americans have been freed from slavery they should not only have become a main influence in a white male dominated society, they should have just miraculously gotten equal treatment and equal rights. You are the one living in a 'fairy land' if you believe there is no longer racism in our government or education systems. Those numbers may be right but the reasons for that are very clear. The repressed will remain repressed so long as there is a dominant opposing force within the system. You are the oblivious one.
User avatar #46 to #30 - semicontra (04/21/2013) [-]
Where did you get this information and what do you mean by sub-species?
User avatar #48 to #46 - taintedangel (04/21/2013) [-]
All colors of skin (yes that includes whitey too) are all considered sub-species of human race.
User avatar #50 to #48 - semicontra (04/21/2013) [-]
So what you mean is that pre-mondern men were homo sapiens and that modern men are homo sapien sapiens, making us a sub species? Or are you speaking of hominids in general and are just referring to us and what we have evolved to be? Though my understanding of subspecies is unclear because it seems as though homo sapiens only have homo sapien sapiens to be the subspecies, but to have a subspecies at all you need to have more than one category. I also understand people don't always make the distinction between homo sapiens and homo sapien sapiens, but this would mean there is no subspecies to begin with.
User avatar #35 to #30 - thumbaccount (04/21/2013) [-]
believe it or not he is right.... for the past 100,000 years it has always been brains over brawl putting blacks in the last place.. this is also the reason for why whites accomplished so much while blacks did nothing in Africa
User avatar #31 to #30 - habanaro (04/21/2013) [-]
Well, my own personal experience is that race doesn't determine IQ. Bravo to these studies, but I know a lot of dumb Asians (and they're not just exceptions to some rule, it seems to be 50/50) and quite a few intelligent black people. This could just because it's in University and most our black students are actually international and come from Africa (a lot are from Kenya), and so they recognize they have to work harder.
tl;dr, personal experience contradicts this.
#37 to #31 - hatinonmyrolls (04/21/2013) [-]
personal experiance =/= scientific proof

just google "least intelligent race" and scroll through 4,000,000,000 articles that say blacks are least intelligent.... there is no argument... the same way abos in Australia have 65 average IQ Africans have 87
User avatar #39 to #37 - habanaro (04/21/2013) [-]
I wasn't saying it wasn't true. Just that I've never really experienced it.
Maybe I got lucky.
 Friends (0)