best robbery ever. .. They should have gone with option B and threw sleeping gas through the air vents
x
Click to expand

Comments(230):

[ 230 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - deescalation ONLINE (11/19/2013) [-]
They should have gone with option B and threw sleeping gas through the air vents
User avatar #3 to #2 - fourtwentt (11/19/2013) [-]
if they thought that far ahead they wouldnt be there in the first place
#11 to #3 - mikoli (11/20/2013) [-]
you don't get it do you?
User avatar #75 to #11 - charagrin (11/20/2013) [-]
Well played. Best laugh on FJ all night.
User avatar #202 to #11 - gwenisghey (11/20/2013) [-]
i dont get it
User avatar #4 to #2 - vynnle (11/20/2013) [-]
But not too much because it'll kill them
#123 - perdurabo (11/20/2013) [-]
<-------- I love his friends reaction
<-------- I love his friends reaction
#1 - crazyolitis (11/19/2013) [-]
Robber's FW
Robber's FW
#78 to #1 - forceman (11/20/2013) [-]
Creature Thread? Creature Thread!!!
Creature Thread? Creature Thread!!!
#187 to #78 - maleficence ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#152 to #78 - andreyb (11/20/2013) [-]
Nova for the win.
Nova for the win.
#140 - grimmwaters ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
Still not as bad as this one.   
Though sill pretty sorrowful.
Still not as bad as this one.
Though sill pretty sorrowful.
#165 to #140 - frozencraft (11/20/2013) [-]
Grade A *******
#132 - halotalim (11/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#150 to #132 - shitposting (11/20/2013) [-]
lol nope
#110 - nintendolover (11/20/2013) [-]
I love how the first guy just looks down in shame.
#102 - aderik ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
by the way the guy with a gun is a cop...
source: I'm italian and that's a carabiniere.
#111 to #102 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Good. Now go to learn the difference between a member of the Army and a cop.
User avatar #112 to #111 - aderik ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
yeah, because the majority of the people know what's the difference between a carabiniere and a cop...
#114 to #112 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
You are saying that if the majority of people believe that the Earth is flat, it is really flat? Your answer confirm that I corrected your sentence, don't be butthurted by that.
Btw that's not a carabiniere, he's an actor
#115 to #114 - aderik ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
no i was saying that if the majority of people doesn't know the difference between a cop and a carabiniere it's pointless to make a difference between them.
<3
#117 to #115 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Allora se dici una cazzata e gli altri non capiscono che è una cazzata, smette di essere una cazzata. Devo dire che ha una logica... Però non prendertela se arriva qualcuno a far notare che hai detto una cazzata ;)
User avatar #119 to #117 - aderik ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
beh spiegami cosa cambia alle persone che non hanno una minima idea di cosa sia un carabiniere sapere che questi è un carabiniere, vedono un tizio con una pistola in una gif e pensano che sia un civile, errore è uno sbirro! carabiniere o poliziotto cambia un cazzo, il lavoro è lo stesso!
#122 to #119 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Va be', se pensi che carabinieri e poliziotti siano li stessi, c'è poco da aggiungere a riguardo.
Se pensano che sia un civile e non notano che è in divisa, cavoli loro.
Il mio discorso più che altro era dovuto al fatto che tu arrivi "Io sono italiano etc etc", scrivi una cosa sbagliata pensando che nessuno ti capisca allora non te la devi prendere se qualcuno ti fa notare che hai scritto qualcosa di sbagliato. Se poi ti diverti a diffondere inesattezze, buon per te. Se dopo trovi l'immagine dei Fagottini, vai pure a dire che sono piccoli "faggot" in Italia, nessuno ti dirà nulla. Forse...
User avatar #127 to #122 - aderik ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
si ma che io conosca la differenza tra un carabiniere e un poliziotto è totalmente irrilevante, saranno cazzi miei rimanere nell'ignoranza oppure no; ribadisco che era solo per far notare che era un dannato sbirro, chiamalo "cop" chiamalo "soldier" rimane un tizio in divisa, se poi il fatto che abbia anche sottolineato che quello sia un carabiniere non ti basta allora muorici male XD
User avatar #142 to #127 - smokingman (11/20/2013) [-]
La funzione di polizia non è esclusiva dell'organo statale che ne porta il nome.
Qualunque forza militare può svolgere la funzione di polizia, ed il corpo dei Carabinieri (per quanto lo statuto ufficiale dica altro) si occupa principalmente di questo.

Anch'io, se mai avessi a descrivere un carabiniere in inglese, userei il termine "cops".
User avatar #145 to #142 - aderik ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
oh grazie XD
#116 to #111 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Actually, whilst they are a military division they also function as a civic police force.

www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/94439/Carabiniere

"The corps also acts as a civil police force, with responsibility for protecting public order and detecting crime. In those areas its function overlaps that of the Polizia de Stato (State Police), and, like the guards, it is responsible to the minister of the interior."
#118 to #116 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
True, I was only highlighting that a carabiniere is not a cop. Their functions can be comparable, but I think is not correct to spread ignorance.
#147 to #118 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
You're a ******* moron.
#170 to #102 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Guarda meglio, i pantaloni sono troppo chiari per essere un carabiniere, credo propria sia un poliziotto della Polizia di Stato, inoltre il logo del filmato è proprio della Polizia di Stato.
#49 - rshanebarnes (11/20/2013) [-]
The robber was at least smart enough to know he was ******
#211 to #49 - yobs (11/20/2013) [-]
Actually I believe he was too busy ******** himself to react
User avatar #80 to #49 - lolme (11/20/2013) [-]
Hi Arrest, I'm Police, nice to meet you.
#141 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Robbers face when his companions abandoned him
User avatar #90 - Rei (11/20/2013) [-]
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
User avatar #56 - lyiat ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
Judging by the uniform, pretty sure that's an off-duty navy officer or marine. Well done on you, sir.
User avatar #74 to #56 - rockamekishiko (11/20/2013) [-]
yeah but it seemed like it took him forever to have the gun ready
User avatar #76 to #74 - lyiat ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
There's a little timer in the corner. Three seconds is hardly 'forever'. He has to register the situation, determine that there is a threat, determine who the threat is, draw the gun, check the safety, and pull back the slider to chamber a bullet. Can you do that in three seconds?
User avatar #77 to #76 - rockamekishiko (11/20/2013) [-]
no but i'm not a navy officer or marine. looks a bit slow after he get it out. If the robbers had guns ready, they could have shot him
User avatar #82 to #77 - liquidz (11/20/2013) [-]
You obviously haven't handled a gun before. Get a bit of range time and you'll see he did it very quickly.

He should have had a round chambered to begin with, but perhaps he had to unload his weapon recently and didn't get a chance to put one back in the chamber. Too many bases and places now wanting you to have your weapon unloaded, but still allow the weapons.
User avatar #87 to #82 - sodapops (11/20/2013) [-]
Safetys aren't that safe. I'd never carry with a chambered bullet in public except with a revolver. Of course, that would require me to live in a country where I could carry at all.
But I agree that the guy was both smooth and fast in a surprising and dangerous situation.

Next spring I'll do my very best to pass the test (47 points out of 50 at 25m) so I can buy a handgun. I only started shooting because the ruger single six is so damn sexy
#133 to #87 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Safetys shouldn't really be necessary even when carrying with a round in the chamber, (unless your gun is seriously ****** up) your gun isn't going to fire randomly in a proper holster.
User avatar #161 to #87 - liquidz (11/20/2013) [-]
Don't rely on the safety, have a good holster and maintain proper trigger control and you are fine.

All the times you see someone get shot during a reholstering or draw is because of a poor holster that collapses on itself, bad trigger control (finger stays out of the trigger guard until you are on target), or some seriously total lack of maintenance.

When practicing drawing remember to do it with an empty gun, and that repeatedly doing it slow and consistent is more important that just doing it fast. Once you have the muscle memory down you'll end up just grabbing it and being on target faster than you realized than someone fooling around to show off and feel macho.

Ironically a revolver I would say needs more care because the hammer catch can be weak, worn, or not the best design. Many striker fired pistols have a catch inside that will stop the striker if it were to move anyway without the trigger being pulled. Where most revolvers do not.

I assume from the point system... you must be in Australia?
#184 - roliga (11/20/2013) [-]
>officer carrying in condition 3
>not carrying in condition 1

As a firearm safety instructor who teaches CCW classes I'm gonna say the only reason this worked is because the criminals had their back to him, any different and he'd have been killed if they had weapons.
User avatar #194 to #184 - cheatmasterjunk (11/20/2013) [-]
As someone who's never touched a firearm (illegal in my country), can you explain what that means?
User avatar #196 to #194 - roliga (11/20/2013) [-]
Condition 0: round in chamber, hammer cocked, safety Off
Condition 1: round in chamber, hammer cocked, safety On
Condition 2: round in chamber, hammer uncocked
(note: all of the above include a loaded magazine in the weapon)
Condition 3: empty chamber, hammer uncocked, loaded magazine in weapon
Condition 4: empty chamber, no magazine in weapon

He had to take the time to put a round in the chamber by pulling his slide back which gives the criminal an opportunity to shoot first or disarm the man.
User avatar #203 to #196 - sanguinesolitude (11/20/2013) [-]
it is much safer though, but yeah.
User avatar #209 to #184 - thegrayfox (11/20/2013) [-]
Don't think there's a reason to carry a gun in condition 1, in a non-combat zone.
User avatar #214 to #209 - roliga (11/20/2013) [-]

except for it's the most practical way to carry incase something happens like in OP's post
User avatar #230 to #214 - thegrayfox (11/21/2013) [-]
And it's not the safest.
User avatar #231 to #230 - roliga (11/21/2013) [-]
How so?
User avatar #232 to #231 - thegrayfox (11/21/2013) [-]
It's not common, but you could accidentally turn the safety off, while the gun is still holstered. So unless you have a 1911 beavertail, there's not much keeping the gun safe. Again, in a non-combat zone.

If it were a different situation, I'd agree with you.

Also, his draw speed was slow, because his gun was under his shirt. So if the robbers were armed. The condition of his gun, wouldn't be a factor. He'd be dead before he could raise his pistol.
#154 - hauntzor (11/20/2013) [-]
only one of them got caught and the other two just went back out like
only one of them got caught and the other two just went back out like
#24 - retepraamrod (11/20/2013) [-]
The last person to wait for this .gif to load.
User avatar #104 to #24 - newdevyx (11/20/2013) [-]
is using internet explorer.
User avatar #92 - gragasvlad (11/20/2013) [-]
Well thats a bit sad for a robbery
User avatar #58 - nthmetal (11/20/2013) [-]
To avoid situations like this:

Rather than have a friend help you in the robbery make him enter the store as if he's a real customer. If all goes according to plan, you're good and you get out of there and so does he.
If this happens on the other hand then you, the robbers, take off your masks and try to explain to they guy that you were trying to prank your friend who had entered the shop earlier. He would be in on it so he can pretend to say "Oh my god you guys almost scared the crap out of me" You'll get a less harsh sentence than you would if he caught you trying to rob the store.
#60 to #58 - tyroneisanigger (11/20/2013) [-]
I'll stick to doing this on GTA Online.

Also, this guys friends are complete ********* . If this happened to my bud and he got caught and I didn't I'd try and either pick up something heavy and hit the douche cop, or hit him in the face and run the **** down the street and not look back.

There's certain cops I'd love to hit. Douchebags wait around the highway and give me tickets everytime I go more than 1 mile over 66 Mph.
******* pigs. This isn't polciing, this is being a dick.

I want to be a cop.
User avatar #97 to #60 - beardgasm (11/20/2013) [-]
You were probably doing something else too like tailgating. They need to pull over more people for that. I was driving home one day going 80-85 in a 70 and some ****** cuts in right behind me and starts motioning for me to get over. I went up to 95 and the faggot was still right behind me. Next time I'm just going to slam on my breaks and sue them for all they're worth when they hit me.
User avatar #73 to #60 - charagrin (11/20/2013) [-]
Yes. This cop stopping a robbery that may lead to more than just robbery is a complete douchebag. I wanna go live on Jupiter. My braincells will live longer.
User avatar #61 to #60 - nthmetal (11/20/2013) [-]
Cops may be pigs sometimes, but this guy wasn't.
User avatar #62 to #60 - Shramin (11/20/2013) [-]
You are complaining because police stop you when you break the law?
#63 to #62 - tyroneisanigger (11/20/2013) [-]
67 mph, you're telling me when you're in a hurry you don't drive anywhere from 65 to 70 mph on an interstate?

It's annoying.

"Sir, do you know how fast you were going?"
"Uh, 65?"
"Nope, 66.99 mph with is .98 mph over the speed limit, you're getting a ticket."
At this point I'm annoyed so i usually say something like " **** you asshole" and I get away with it.
User avatar #64 to #63 - Shramin (11/20/2013) [-]
You would have me believe you only ever break the speed limit slightly?

I doubt that.
#66 to #64 - tyroneisanigger (11/20/2013) [-]
Yes, actually I do. the most I do is 70 mph when I am out on an interstate.where the speed limit is 65.
User avatar #67 to #66 - Shramin (11/20/2013) [-]
That is 8 Kilometers above the speed limit, reasonable to stop you at that speed.
#68 to #67 - tyroneisanigger (11/20/2013) [-]
That's 5 mph over, and I believe cops are trained not to bother with it unless it's more than 5 mph over the limit.
User avatar #69 to #68 - Shramin (11/20/2013) [-]
Unless its a highway with regular incidents perhaps?

Consider this: the cops never bother with only slightly over the speed limit, people adjust to it being okay to drive 70 instead of 65, people start speeding up because 70 is the "norm" even if it is above the limit.
#70 to #69 - tyroneisanigger (11/20/2013) [-]
Hmm, that could be possible.
User avatar #71 to #70 - Shramin (11/20/2013) [-]
There may be many bad cops, but that doesn't mean the cops who stop you for "Something unreasonable" are doing it to be a dick, they may be generally concerned about what breaking the limit/law slightly can do.

I suggest looking up the accident rate on the roads you commonly drive and figure out if you being annoyed with the police is reasonable or not, at least that will inform you of you choices.
User avatar #134 to #58 - tylosaurus ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
and then they find that you were armed and everybody laughed as the sentence you received got even more harsh.
#131 - hatmanfirst (11/20/2013) [-]
Every time I watch this and start noticing more and more of the details, the funnier it gets.
Every time I watch this and start noticing more and more of the details, the funnier it gets.
#169 to #131 - pyrosevenone (11/20/2013) [-]
Everytime I laugh when newfags upload reposted images
User avatar #148 to #131 - askafj (11/20/2013) [-]
Like how one of the robbers gets greeted by the guy who walks out.
#146 - oversoul (11/20/2013) [-]
cop's face when
User avatar #9 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
A perfect example of why handguns should be openly available to the public. I bet this will never get any more than a local mentioning on the news.
User avatar #182 to #9 - nigeltheoutlaw (11/20/2013) [-]
I think they should be openly available, but I don't think background checks and a training course prior to ownership are unreasonable precautions to ensure that those unfit and unable to handle a gun can't get them.
User avatar #183 to #182 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Fair enough, I agree.
User avatar #200 to #183 - nigeltheoutlaw (11/20/2013) [-]
And god damnit let me legally buy an AK, California. I'm not gonna shoot anyone, I just want a ******* AK.
User avatar #12 to #9 - datlaugh (11/20/2013) [-]
So people can successfully rob stores?
#13 to #12 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
I don't know what you saw, but I definitely didn't see a successful robbery.
User avatar #14 to #13 - datlaugh (11/20/2013) [-]
Well they failed, so if they had handguns I assume they would have been able to overpower the man with the gun... thus they would be successful in their robbery.
User avatar #15 to #14 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
How the hell do you rob a store without a weapon? Ask nicely for the man behind the counter to fill the ************* bag? I'm sure at least one of them had a gun, but none of them were committed to the scheme, not enough to risk taking a bullet anyway.
User avatar #35 to #15 - ponyfcker (11/20/2013) [-]
That actually happened. www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4xL3AjSLvM
User avatar #50 to #35 - insaneguy (11/20/2013) [-]
he... had a gun though
User avatar #16 to #15 - datlaugh (11/20/2013) [-]
This is what I'm saying, if the three men were able to obtain handguns legally, as you said, they would have been able to rob the store.
User avatar #18 to #16 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Okay, firstly, if three teenagers (who cannot purchase handguns until 21 yrs old) are desperate enough to rob a store for a couple of hundred dollars at the most, how do they scrape together a little over a thousand, closer to 2,000 if they're buying anything quality?
User avatar #21 to #18 - karvarausku ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
okey where do you live? because in finland you can legally get a gun with parents permission and getting gun permission when you are 15
User avatar #23 to #21 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
My bad, I made the assumption that we were all American here, but I would like to pay special attention, two you and the other two people I am waging this war against, to Chicago, a city with the most advanced gun control law system in the country, and it is soaked in the blood of innocent bystanders and gang victims.
User avatar #19 to #18 - datlaugh (11/20/2013) [-]
Well I assume that if they are openly available to the public, as you suggested, they would be able to find quite an easy way to obtain them. Thanks to their lowered retail value because of the larger scale manufacturing of the handguns, they would be able to get them at very good price.
User avatar #22 to #19 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Or, the relaxed gun restrictions will cause purchases to rise in frequency and therefore prices to rise
User avatar #26 to #22 - datlaugh (11/20/2013) [-]
I am sorry that an entire argument had to come from an attempt at a joke I made, so may I ask you one question?
User avatar #28 to #26 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Go ahead.
User avatar #25 to #22 - datlaugh (11/20/2013) [-]
Well if they have robbed some stores with their handguns they bought while the retail price was still low, money wouldn't be an object.
User avatar #27 to #25 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
The retail price is never low in this situation. You want a quality Glock? The minimum you can get it four is five hundred, four if you're lucky, the second and restriction come off those prices are gonna skyrocket, along with ammunition prices.
User avatar #29 to #27 - datlaugh (11/20/2013) [-]
Alright then, but may I ask you a simple question?
User avatar #30 to #29 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Yeah go ahead, I had a comment typed up then got sidetracked on a custom Glock site and posted the comment before seeing that you had responded, what is your question?
User avatar #31 to #30 - datlaugh (11/20/2013) [-]
Do you know what the difference between three penises and a joke is?
User avatar #32 to #31 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
No I don't, what is the difference between three penises and a joke?
User avatar #33 to #32 - datlaugh (11/20/2013) [-]
You can't take a joke.
#34 to #33 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Interesting.
User avatar #157 to #33 - johnnygoldmane **User deleted account** (11/20/2013) [-]
If laughing at that joke was immature, then I don't even want to know what maturity is. That was beautiful.
User avatar #83 to #14 - liquidz (11/20/2013) [-]
Having a weapon does not mean you win by default even with greater numbers.

Fear is a factor, not wanting to get killed is a factor, and so is skill.

Most criminals want to take the path of least resistance and when they encounter it will run the other way.
#17 to #9 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
on the right people, not the ****** up ones. you ******* idiot
User avatar #20 to #17 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
And how, pray tell, do you discern people like me, average Texans, who use guns for hunting, and ease of mind, from people a hop and a skip away from putting a bullet into the Indian guy in a convenience store?
User avatar #101 to #20 - gorilladinn (11/20/2013) [-]
PRAY TELL
#113 to #9 - gloriousthighs (11/20/2013) [-]
How friggun retarded are you? God damn, guns being legal to regular people leads to nothing good.
User avatar #36 to #9 - froghole (11/20/2013) [-]
in america handguns are openly available to the public.
User avatar #37 to #36 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Not in Chicago, make some popcorn and read my twenty comment rant below.
User avatar #38 to #37 - froghole (11/20/2013) [-]
i am far too unambitious to do that tonight.
User avatar #39 to #38 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Implying certain nights you are up for a good comment war between a Texan and a Yankee?
User avatar #40 to #39 - froghole (11/20/2013) [-]
more or less, yeah
User avatar #41 to #40 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Do you have an opinion on gun control? Assuming you are in America where that is still an issue.
User avatar #42 to #41 - froghole (11/20/2013) [-]
it is impossible to control guns as the people who really want to get ahold of a gun can and will find a way to get one.
User avatar #43 to #42 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
I found him, the one person on the internet with the legendary ability of common sense
User avatar #44 to #43 - froghole (11/20/2013) [-]
thank you sir.
User avatar #55 to #9 - esquaredsixteen (11/20/2013) [-]
Isn't the guy in the video not a civilian?
User avatar #126 to #9 - toncheky ONLINE (11/20/2013) [-]
The guy was obviously not a civilian.
User avatar #129 to #9 - udungoofedup (11/20/2013) [-]
I thought that at first, then I thought about what if they all had guns, chances are someone will be shot/dead by the end of this.
User avatar #47 to #9 - trollxmaster (11/20/2013) [-]
Exactly, banning guns is asinine. If you make guns illegal, then only the criminals will have them.
#88 to #47 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
russia is a pretty good example for that.
#135 to #9 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
if guns were open to public they would ALSO of had a gun wish would of put them in a 3 arms man vs 1 situation or if more were armed possibly a shoot out with many dead... so tell me why is it a good idea to have guns for all?
User avatar #144 to #135 - slenderwolf (11/20/2013) [-]
Look at the extreme, Chicago has the blood of innocents flowing through the gutters, and they have the most controled gun market in America.
#54 to #9 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Carriers very rarely defend others from crimes. It's called the bystander effect.

#59 to #54 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Why vote me down? I wasn't stating any political opinions, it is just a fact, one backed by both psychology and statistics.
And like esquaredsixteen said, the dude in the gif was not a civilian.

If you want people to respect your freedom, try not using teenager logic.
#108 to #59 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Your mistake was trying to use facts against gun lobbyists.

Emotion and hypotheticals is all they have as justification.
#121 to #108 - ogloko (11/20/2013) [-]
in every city and country that has imposed a gun ban, violent crime has gone up post ban. also, if there were one group that is traditionally emotional and hypothetical, it would be gun control advocates.
User avatar #138 to #121 - hudis (11/20/2013) [-]
That's a natural consequence of banning guns and it would happen anywhere. What people have to realise is that gun control can't solely be about taking people's guns; it has to be combined with for example increased police presence in the area and generally more money temporarily poured into things like education, youth centres and infrastructure.

Banning something always causes temporary consequences, albeit chaotic. That's why I don't think a nation-wide gun ban would be effective. Doing it gradually, step by step, is better and safer.
#217 to #138 - ogloko (11/20/2013) [-]
or we could put money into those things and leave guns alone
#160 to #138 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Our police force, education system, and communities are already stretched thin. I really don't think that a gun ban would work unless the US hit some unprecedented golden age, otherwise the US is too big, too poor, and has too many guns on the streets already to have an effective gun ban.
User avatar #166 to #160 - hudis (11/20/2013) [-]
Probably. And I know it's stretched thing, it tends to show. Changing priorities of where the money goes would probably be a good idea right now.
#177 to #166 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
I just don't think there's anywhere to squeeze money from that's not going to cause huge backlash. Not at the time anyway, like I said, if the US hits some mountain of gold maybe it could work, but at the time being, there just isn't an effective way to do it.
User avatar #179 to #177 - hudis (11/20/2013) [-]
I myself am deeply skeptical the enormous military spending of the U.S., but I've come to understand that a lot of Americans really aren't.
User avatar #218 to #179 - skeptical (11/20/2013) [-]
Please stop dragging me into your stupid arguments
User avatar #219 to #218 - hudis (11/20/2013) [-]
Please stop commenting every time I am skeptical to something. I do not care what you think and I won't stop using the word simply because it happens to be your username.
User avatar #220 to #219 - skeptical (11/20/2013) [-]
I have nothing against mentions, but you are the only person who consistently uses it several times in a month and your comments tend to be infuriatingly stupid.
User avatar #221 to #220 - hudis (11/20/2013) [-]
Likewise, but different opinions are not a measure of intelligence.
User avatar #222 to #221 - skeptical (11/21/2013) [-]
Indeed. I do like that your opinion is evolving though. My opinion is that there should be separate licenses for defense/hunting ownership (if there aren't already; I'm not particularly well versed in this, I am not a gun owner) and that the owner information should be stored on an online police database/whitelist/blacklist. Owners with a criminal record should be put on a "gun parole" of sorts.
User avatar #223 to #222 - hudis (11/21/2013) [-]
Well, I'd like to think my opinions are constantly evolving. Little point in them otherwise. I agree with what you're saying, though; your opinion seems to have shifted somewhat as well. I can't recall what it was we argued about ages ago, but I do recall that it may not have been pleasant.
User avatar #224 to #223 - skeptical (11/21/2013) [-]
It was gun control
It's always gun control when you mention me
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
Why can't we be friends
The Game
User avatar #225 to #224 - hudis (11/21/2013) [-]
I think we just softened to each other. What the hell.
User avatar #227 to #225 - skeptical (11/21/2013) [-]
I think I was the reason you hid your profile desc too
User avatar #228 to #227 - hudis (11/21/2013) [-]
Hah. Honestly, I didn't even know I had it hidden - I think it's like that by default. Or not, and I may have done it for one reason or other. Now you can entertain yourself reading through all my socialist, semi-pacifistic posts!
User avatar #229 to #228 - skeptical (11/21/2013) [-]
Easy, Scott
Tolerance
Tooollllllerrrrannnncccce
Sounds like fun
I got really pissed at you in that first argument and started thumbing your stuff down blindly, looked back a day later and your profile was hidden
Oh well, that's water under the bridge now, right? Here, have some thumbs to make up for it
User avatar #226 to #225 - skeptical (11/21/2013) [-]
"The hardest anvil is the first to crack"
#199 to #179 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
I'd like it to be smaller, but not that much smaller. Because we're not exactly living in a great time with China, Russia, and North Korea. I'd prefer to be prepared.
User avatar #86 to #59 - viperish (11/20/2013) [-]
Had he been civ would it change anything? Even if they very rarely defend others, how about themselves?
User avatar #5 - instakill (11/20/2013) [-]
and this is why I concealed carry
#7 to #5 - John Cena (11/20/2013) [-]
Are you a police officer ?
User avatar #8 to #7 - instakill (11/20/2013) [-]
no, however I run through the same drills as my MP friends do I would be there with them but my knees are ****** so the army won't take me and I take and help run regular gun safety courses
#45 to #8 - wymlan (11/20/2013) [-]
Pic related. Will you take a look at this thread for me? www.funnyjunk.com/channel/fucking-guns/Newest+to+my+collection/TkDuGGx/40#40
[ 230 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)