aNYEther bill nye post. . god Free World an Following My daughter on the We/ Ham event: it' s not fair because the stupid guy gets to use his imagination and Bi
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

aNYEther bill nye post

  • Recommend tagsx

Comments(132):

[ 132 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #10 - crazyanimal (02/07/2014) [+] (10 replies)
How can we even prove that the debate happened if it was in the past?
0
#2 - arnolddusk Comment deleted by staticenhance [+] (10 replies)
User avatar #4 to #2 - Daeiros (02/07/2014) [-]
nobody is bashing religion here, they are bashing young earth creationists

as bill said repeatedly in the debate, there are millions of Christians who do not think that genesis is to be taken as a literal and accurate historical text proving that the universe was made in 7 24-hour days and the series of joe begat billy, who begat tom... gives a precise measurement of the age of the earth being 10,000

that is the stupid idea here that can only be supported by saying "yeah sure, well, even though we know that trees add a ring every year they are alive, and that tree there has 12,000 rings, that doesn't prove that it is 12,000 years old, you don't know, you weren't there, god must have made that tree 2,000 years old at creation, historical science isn't real so shut up"

It is entirely possible, and quite logical to believe that perhaps god explained the nature of creation in a way that would make sense to a bunch of shepherds living in mud huts 5,000 years ago and that genesis is not a word for word precise retelling of the birth of existence exactly as it happened.
User avatar #39 - brettyoke (02/07/2014) [+] (3 replies)
@godfreeworld


The fedora is strong with this one
#17 - fyaq (02/07/2014) [+] (7 replies)
You people will believe just about anything wont you?
User avatar #37 - thejusticar (02/07/2014) [+] (2 replies)
sorry but i dont give to ******* ***** about this stupid ****** debate
User avatar #13 - diablojoe (02/07/2014) [-]
Considering this is from an account called God free world, I'm going to guess this is just atheist spam ********

Not that I support Ham in anyway or his views, but I am a little tired of this stuff
User avatar #46 - rockmanfan (02/08/2014) [+] (4 replies)
ok, seriously. who even cares about this debate. why bother debating god vs science in the first place? people dont worship religion because of facts, or knowledge, they do it because of faith, whereas athiests, like me, put their faith in something else other than a diety. the whole thing is just making both sides look like huge dicks to the other, and dividing people for needless reasons.

/rant
#43 - dickticklerluv (02/07/2014) [+] (3 replies)
>godfreeworld
>godfreeworld
User avatar #7 - randomathon (02/07/2014) [-]
Ya i'm sure your daughter said that.
#76 - ratchetmiles ONLINE (02/08/2014) [+] (5 replies)
There's nothing wrong with atheists or christians, but when Atheists make useless remarks insulting intelligence of religious people, it's just uncalled for, same for Christians rioting about gay marriage and **** .

I am a christian, but I still believe in evolution and that gays should be able to marry.
User avatar #44 - kikx (02/07/2014) [+] (8 replies)
Bill Nye is starting a religion of his own it would seem
User avatar #48 to #44 - YllekNayr (02/08/2014) [-]
I can't adequately put into words just how ******* stupid you sound.
#103 - bitey (02/08/2014) [+] (1 reply)
The video of the debate was on youtube, but it got flagged for rape.
The video of the debate was on youtube, but it got flagged for rape.
User avatar #63 - faimbot (02/08/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Nothing against ken ham, but when he used the argument of "science means knowledge" and then the difference between observational science and historical science not being the same, because historical science cannot be verified... why didn't bill nye say "which category is the bible in?" because it should be historical and therefore not valid.

Also ken ham disputes the whole, 4.7 billion year old asteroid saying we are discussing earth, but i thought God created the universe in 6, 24 hour day cycles, so the asteroids would have been made at the same time as earth.

But ken ham was very quick to the punch, i liked that he didn't find trouble refuting (however flawed some of the logic was) a lot of what bill was saying, he seemed the better prepared of the two.

Regardless, bill nye didn't make a good point with his "11 new species a day" thing, i found that a bit dumb to be fair, but all his other points were really great, the winter summer life cycles and "Are fish sinners?" (which cracked me up). It was a great debate from both, ken ham over did it with the "there is a book for the answer to that" it felt like going round in circles however he had an answer to pretty much everything, but again bill clearly isn't much of a debater, he has all the knowledge but it's putting the knowledge into phrasing that doesn't sound patronising, which he was struggling to do, especially in kentucky, a pro religious state.
User avatar #110 - kingdork (02/08/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Ham didn't even use the good pro-Bible arguments. I think this debate was fixed to promote the illuminati's "God is dead" narrative.
#113 to #110 - implication (02/08/2014) [-]
>illuminati's "God is dead" narrative.

Retard.
User avatar #82 - xmonke (02/08/2014) [+] (3 replies)
I thought it was funny how Ham kept referring to "observational science" as the foundation for his argument, yet nothing he was talking about is observable. It's all based on faith.
User avatar #34 - IamKingNothing (02/07/2014) [+] (3 replies)
I wasn't there so I don't know if this really happened or not.
User avatar #101 - bobindun (02/08/2014) [-]
I can't help but feel the daughter of A god free world would be a little biased. Even though it makes sense.
#77 - anonymous (02/08/2014) [+] (5 replies)
Can we please just stop debating already? How hard is it to just get along?   
@godfreeworld, having a God-free world will not get us any closer to stopping world hunger. Believing in God is not preventing us from finding the cure to cancer or developing incredible software. Furthermore, if I believe in creation, I could still be perfectly capable of building the spaceship that will bring humans to Mars.   
   
To Creationists: God did not specifically write out Genesis to be scientific. A) Because none of those people back then would get it, and B) because it is not what the Bible is meant for. It isn't a textbook for science class. It's a guide on how to be a proper Christian and get into Heaven.   
To evolutionist/atheists: If God is real, he transcends our physical world, and therefore any knowledge we can obtain from our universe (i.e. science). You cannot use the study of what we can know to prove or disprove the things that we cannot. So stop trying.____
Can we please just stop debating already? How hard is it to just get along?
@godfreeworld, having a God-free world will not get us any closer to stopping world hunger. Believing in God is not preventing us from finding the cure to cancer or developing incredible software. Furthermore, if I believe in creation, I could still be perfectly capable of building the spaceship that will bring humans to Mars.

To Creationists: God did not specifically write out Genesis to be scientific. A) Because none of those people back then would get it, and B) because it is not what the Bible is meant for. It isn't a textbook for science class. It's a guide on how to be a proper Christian and get into Heaven.
To evolutionist/atheists: If God is real, he transcends our physical world, and therefore any knowledge we can obtain from our universe (i.e. science). You cannot use the study of what we can know to prove or disprove the things that we cannot. So stop trying.____
User avatar #85 to #77 - rifee (02/08/2014) [-]
You don't get it sadly. The sole reason the atheist movement has become such a huge thing lately is exactley BECAUSE they are tired of religious people not wanting to get along. They are tired of the restraints they put on societ and topics/issues with their "belief".

If religious didn't intervene in public issues because of their faith, there would be little need for atheist to say anything at all.
User avatar #64 - KINGOFTHESTARS (02/08/2014) [-]
i bet she didnt say that
0
#49 - somekornchick Comment deleted by staticenhance [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #51 to #49 - staticenhance (02/08/2014) [-]
This is a debate over creationism, not religion you moron.
[ 132 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)