You may need to restart your america. . America was not shut down properly. Would you like to start America in safe mode, with free healthcare and without guns? america shut down
x
Click to expand

Comments(46):

[ 46 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#4 - mondprinzessin (10/05/2013) [-]
i like my guns
User avatar #23 - icedmantwo ONLINE (10/06/2013) [-]
Given that guns have many uses like self defense and healthcare isn't actually free, but rather socialized I fail to see why that would be recommended
#10 - ffslogin (10/05/2013) [-]
1/2 of FJ community: Hmm, lets present concise and clear evidence that shows guns are actually keeping crime and crime related deaths down.

1/4 of FJ community: Well, I respectfully disagree and here is my own evidence as to why I believe another form of action is better.

other 1/4 of FJ community: GUNS ARE ONLY FOR ******* TERORIST OMG DONT STAHP GUNS R BAHD AND U WILL KEEL POOPLE.
#6 - lonevolff (10/05/2013) [+] (5 replies)
you can have my gun when you pry it from my cold dead fingers
User avatar #38 - mrwightproductions (10/06/2013) [-]
How do we get rid of the criminals guns... and keep those who will become criminals from guns... making them illegal doesn't stop a criminal... find a better solution.
#3 - bodyrokr (10/05/2013) [-]
We should make our own America, with blackjack and hookers
We should make our own America, with blackjack and hookers
#36 - mexicandudeinsd ONLINE (10/06/2013) [+] (1 reply)
i dont socialist crap, my freedom senses are tingling
User avatar #13 - gilliam ONLINE (10/06/2013) [+] (2 replies)
People need to stop using the term "free healthcare" cause it's not, or it shouldn't be.
True "free healthcare" is doomed to fail.
In europe we pay for our healthcare in our taxes that come of our payroll each month,
but when events do arise, like your father getting cancer (of wich costs run astronomically high) you're covered for everything, then you realise that's what you been payign for your entire life.
I'm not trying to generalize people, but i know that most of the republicans see a big problem in giving up a part of their payroll for "other people", but when you've been through what i have, you happily do so.
#42 - arkamedies (10/06/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I would argue why gun control is a load of **** but idiots in other socialist countries and retards in America are more prominent on websites like this, and I would lose to non-stop bitching and "Why do you need a gun?" questions.
#39 - iaintevenrustled (10/06/2013) [-]
Sick of the government shutdown 			****		. Especially autistic 			****		 like this.
Sick of the government shutdown **** . Especially autistic **** like this.
User avatar #34 - kyleayv (10/06/2013) [-]
Im like 99% sure this was made to cause a **** storm and get comments.
User avatar #30 - Digitalphear (10/06/2013) [-]
Lol so much ignorance.

Because no guns would fix everything, right?
User avatar #27 - StaticX (10/06/2013) [-]
I disagree with even the concept of socialized healthcare. Why should I pay for something I don't use or that other people use many times more than me? I understand that it's nice to think that everyone in the United States is enlightenly self-interested, but there not. It will cause more money to be taken out of paychecks to some paychecks making people have less money. People wont be happy about that. The best way to explain it is in a metaphor I guess. Lets say, we're all legally required to buy grocery insurance so everyone, it costs $300 for everyone and it's taken out of your paychecks over the course of each month. This $300 will allow you to get as many groceries as you want. Who will benefit from that more, the single person or the family with 8 kids? This a great deal with 10 people to feed, but the single man will feel ripped off. As a result, the single man will have less money to spend on other goods because he had to spend that $300 a month on grocery insurance. As a result, he will be tempted, and most likely will, move to an area that does not have this grocery insurance so he can spend the money on luxury goods. It will also lead to grocery stores having less income, just the subsidized part from the government. So, the grocery store owner will most likely fire some workers to keep his money. Or, more than likely, he'll say "Why not just knock the whole ******* thing down and put up a parking garage or an apartment building, so I can get more money?" In the long run, while it seems like we'll be helping the family with 8 kids get food to better their lives, we'll actually be making it harder for them due to income loss from the single person leaving and lose to willingness of people to supply the food which leads down to food being even harder for the family to actually obtain. Now, just apply that logic to health-care to see why i'm against it.
TLDR-- Classical economics > Keynesian economics
#24 - nevolmon (10/06/2013) [-]
/k/ wanted to be operator, but his country wouldn't let him
User avatar #5 - splendiddust ONLINE (10/05/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Without guns with gun laws like Australia
#43 - marsupilami (10/06/2013) [-]
rabble rabble rabble!
User avatar #40 - dunkleosteus (10/06/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Gun control. That's what you guys need. I don't know about who ever reads this comment in particular, but there is a high percentage of Americans who are NOT safe with their guns, and frankly, should have them confiscated.
#35 - coolcoy (10/06/2013) [-]
I'll keep my guns, thank you. Gotta have something for when idiots and criminals get frisky. lol
-3
#2 - economic has deleted their comment [+] (8 replies)
User avatar #15 to #2 - ilovehitler (10/06/2013) [-]
I would like statistics from a credible source to support your claim.
[ 46 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)