Upload
Login or register
x

White

3; j firey ". Follow
Question: What is the biggest barrier to
innovation in the United States?
Answer: The dominance and incompetence
of white men.
2 30 AM - f) Aug 2014
wwhite man invents sustainable electricity
wwhite man invents personal computer
wwhite man invents ********** Internet
wwhite man invents Twitter
nignorant POE flocked these inventions to tell them how are
rail my ******* sides
...
+1818
Views: 50878
Favorited: 100
Submitted: 10/22/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to skyrimdovah

Comments(225):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 225 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
168 comments displayed.
Reply
+169
#6 - hismomo (10/23/2015) [-]
Everyone here is gonna be talking about the contributions of white and black people, but I'll just throw out that Asia had a pretty damn big impact as well.
Reply
-32
#40 to #6 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Noone cares about you slant gook *****
Reply
+6
User avatar #202 to #40 - severepwner (10/23/2015) [-]
And then there's this asshole.
Reply
+1
#211 to #6 - shoryuken (10/23/2015) [-]
I don't know what that is........... I see a spoon though
miniature 13 ghosts machine?
Reply
+3
User avatar #196 to #6 - beboethevile ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
well sjw's throw Asians together with whites
Reply
+3
#203 to #6 - thrownawayforgood ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Yeah, if they didn't invent anime we'd all be ****** !
Reply
+18
#119 to #6 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Yes, we all love our bottle rockets, and cherry bombs. Thanks you Asia.
Reply
-1
#123 to #119 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
your comment was funnier then the original post. But I guess some people can't take a joke.
Reply
+49
User avatar #14 to #6 - heartlessrobot (10/23/2015) [-]
Opium?
Reply
+11
#28 to #14 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Well, they tried to fix that problem but then the british started a war so they could force them to keep buying it.
Reply
+2
User avatar #15 to #14 - hismomo (10/23/2015) [-]
Opium's been a thing since prehistoric times. The Chinese just got a bit... obsessed over it.
Reply
+19
User avatar #16 to #15 - heartlessrobot (10/23/2015) [-]
War's been a thing since prehistoric times too.
That doesn't mean tanks and nukes aren't big impacts.
Reply
+5
#103 to #16 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Neither of which were invented in Asia.
Reply
+1
User avatar #19 to #1 - Maadmann (10/23/2015) [-]
This dude has based commentaries on great fight videos.
Reply
+1
#181 to #1 - cockandballz (10/23/2015) [-]
I hope this isn't real
Reply
+2
#64 to #1 - pleasantp (10/23/2015) [-]
Are you retarded? You think that somebody with no money and no ties to anyone outside of their community can just "get up and leave"? If you actually believe this ******** then you're one of the most ignorant people that I've encountered.
Reply
+2
#208 to #64 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
well no money makes things hard sure but no ties to anyone? that doesn't stop you from doing anything
Reply
+5
User avatar #24 to #1 - fiveblackmen (10/23/2015) [-]
While I agree with the general statement here, there is a flaw. The fact is that after the slaves were freed, they had no money and could not afford to leave.A few did end up going to Canada but most were so extremely under-educated and probably didn't realize that they could leave. However, that isn't an excuse for the behavior of many people today, and it isn't just limited to non-white people. There is this wave of angry stupidity that seems to have washed over the world and caused a massive number of people blame random groups of people for all their problems. In the US, white people are given far fewer advantages than other races, especially when it comes to getting an education and being hired. The only advantage some white people have is money but most of them get this money from getting an education and a decent job. They are literally running out of excuses and are left to come up with random, illogical reasons they can't get anywhere and hiding behind accusations of racism.
Reply
+6
#141 to #1 - ronniesan (10/23/2015) [-]
I thought this **** was fake, but he's real as **** .

www.youtube.com/channel/UCR70CjRHxQilfEUgBBYpDhg

he normally doesn't flame that hard, but he's for sure not PC.
Reply
-181
#7 to #1 - ogdonaldengel (10/23/2015) [-]
Honestly, using the word " ****** " only shows the extremely racist culture the U.S. still accepts. Instead of treating black people with proper respect, they're disrespected, then when they react angrily because of the discrimination, they're called ******* . You can't say that blacks aren't discriminated against in the U.S., **** , look at the Mike Brown case, Trayvon Martin, even the Eric Garner mishap. Thats only from police brutality, with the worst possible outcome: murder of the innocent, and freedom to the guilty (The WHITE officers). There are many more black people undeservingly convicted of crimes that white people get away with, but too many people in Amerikkka the "Great" will deny it, because hey, apparently they were just " ******* " who deserved it.
Reply
+196
#8 to #7 - scruffyguy (10/23/2015) [-]
"ayy yo white boy-ee **** you lookin at"
" **** off ****** "

"oh my god that's so disrespectful ;((((("
Reply
+10
User avatar #138 to #8 - herbolifee (10/23/2015) [-]
level -400
Gee, do you think he might be a troll?
Reply
0
User avatar #191 to #138 - shieeetposter (10/23/2015) [-]
>replies to obvious bait

Might be a thumbwhore (him, not you)
Reply
+95
#12 to #7 - BLOCKATIEL (10/23/2015) [-]
Woah woah woah. Slow down there champ. There is a big difference between someone who is black, and someone who is a ****** . Knowing the difference is important. I work with dozens of people everyday of every ethnicity computer salesman and have never treated a black family worse than a white family. But you can bet your damn ass I get some gangster ass black kid who thinks he's tough **** coming in, and I am going to treat him differently than someone who is respectful.
Reply
+32
User avatar #27 to #12 - goddamnwizard (10/23/2015) [-]
That's the thing about Tommy Sotomayor though. He's said many times "there's black folks. Then there's ******* "
He hates ******* just as much as the rest of the world. Perfectly fine with black peoples though.
Reply
+26
#72 to #27 - octagon (10/23/2015) [-]
EXACTLY! The people that are the MOST fed up with ******* are Black People!

Because not only are black people JUST as nervous around them as whites, but they have to Defend themselves against other races that cant tell the difference.

I've had people CLEARLY afraid I was gonna go"Aw helllll naw" ******* when something didn't work out as planned and you can tell when people are ******* bracing for the worst. their body language screams "I want to run away" Only to be relieved when i say " That's unfortunate, But I completely understand, you did all you could."
AKA they were SHOCKED when I acted like a DECENT human Being. How is this not a problem?

This is why I agree with him saying, "I hate ******* and Think they all get what they deserve for terrorizing and bullying people"

And white people shouldn't feel bad about saying it either, because until we separate the decent people from the trash, we will NEVER correct the issue.

Having no money / single mother / enslaved ancestors IS NO excuse to be ****** person. PERIOD.
Reply
+12
#77 to #72 - skebaba (10/23/2015) [-]
Same with those cunts who do false rape reports, lessening the credibility of the actually raped people, making them less likely to get justice.
Reply
-3
#212 to #72 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
just gonna be that guy and mention that's not how to use "aka"
Reply
-14
#97 to #72 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Bro
You're still a ****** to me
Reply
+1
#62 to #12 - partycats (10/23/2015) [-]
Thank you, ******* come in all shapes and forms, it just so happens that american blacks are usually ******* .
Reply
+7
User avatar #67 to #62 - BLOCKATIEL (10/23/2015) [-]
I'll disagree with that. The majority of black people I've met have been respectful and not ********* at all. But I guess it really depend son where you live.
Reply
+2
#109 to #67 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Pretty much. It mostly depends on the average income and population density. The denser the population and the lower the average income, the worse the people you find there get. This isn't unique to blacks either if anything I see it just as often if not more often amongst latinos, but then again I live in SoCal so the demographics are different
Reply
+2
#68 to #67 - partycats (10/23/2015) [-]
I agree with you.
Reply
-6
#22 to #12 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
There isn't though.
Reply
+14
#108 to #7 - broswagonist ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
well done funnyjunk
Reply
+17
#57 to #7 - norwegiansnowman (10/23/2015) [-]
there is a difference between a ****** and a black person, same as there is a difference between a fag and a gay person.
**** off ******** .
Reply
+4
#9 to #7 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Aw **** , I was about to look into the cases mentioned above thinking I missed some **** a while back, then I saw the lil **** that made the comment. Almost Ogdon, almost.
Reply
+5
User avatar #84 to #7 - Abortedwafflez (10/23/2015) [-]
Mike Brown robbed a convenience store and wrestled an officer for his gun then charged at him. Not a very good example of discrimination. And Trayvon Martin had nothing to do with police brutality. Just a Hispanic looking neighborhood watch guy who went looking for trouble.
Reply
-6
#95 to #84 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
If you believe that, then cops can lie and get away with it... that report is hogwash
Reply
0
User avatar #147 to #95 - Abortedwafflez (10/23/2015) [-]
>implying the cops lied
>implying they had room to lie
>implying the government didn't get involved in the investigation.
>implying they didn't have significant evidence published online to the public.
Reply
0
#106 to #95 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Brown was a suspect at the time, and a forensic investigation by the FBI proved that at the time Brown was shot, he was running towards the cop that shot him (based on the angle they entered from), an investigation that, I might add, was DEMANDED by Barack Obama because he WANTED the police to be seen as racist, but it turned out that they were in the right.
Reply
+5
User avatar #51 to #7 - marno (10/23/2015) [-]
The fact that you cited only those high profile cases and not actual stats shows that you have no idea what you're talking about. You just take what the media feeds you without a hint of suspicion. In real life, not medialand, ******* commit something like 6 times as much violence as whites in America. When they are only a small portion of the population. More against each other, and more against whites.
Reply
+7
#41 to #7 - thesweetscientist (10/23/2015) [-]
I'm not a racist cause I called somebody a " ****** "
I'm racist cause I kill ******* for being ******* .
Reply
-3
User avatar #132 to #41 - elenalkarnur (10/23/2015) [-]
Calling ******* ******* doesn't make you racist. Calling black people ******* when they're not being ******* , makes you racist.

That's just, like, Racism 101.
Reply
+4
User avatar #39 to #7 - elyiia (10/23/2015) [-]
You list three "examples" of which two were justifiable homicides. Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin both died because they decided to attack someone.
Reply
-12
#42 to #39 - Carthusia (10/23/2015) [-]

>Zimmerman's police record is a mile long
>Told repeatedly by police at the time to ******* stop following Trayvon
>Confronted him anyway for no goddamned reason
>Still implying Trayvon Martin's death was justified

Reply
+2
#96 to #42 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Nevertheless you can stand your ground bro

****** had it coming
Reply
+1
#43 to #42 - mrblankiepoo (10/23/2015) [-]
The police can also tell you that the sky is purple, just because they tell you something doesn't mean you have to do it. Was it stupid of him to follow him in the dark? yes, but was zimmerman in the wrong? no. I don't think any death is necessary, but if someone is being attacked they have the right to defend themselves.
Reply
+1
User avatar #216 to #43 - desmondxburton (10/24/2015) [-]
But he was told by police and didn't listen which led to a situation in which someone ended up dead, which means he should be held responsible for his actions. Self defense is when u get into a situation against your will and have to protect your life, not when you agitate a situation and shoot someone because you were getting your ass beat. You could even say Treyvon thought was defending himself when he say some weird White/Hispanic guy following him around. If Treyvon had started attacking him unprovoked then that would be a different story.
Reply
0
#217 to #216 - mrblankiepoo (10/24/2015) [-]
It was unprovoked... Unless you consider someone walking around on public property provoking someone. That doesn't give someone the right to attack someone just because they are near them. Sure it was a bad decision to follow him. But a bad decision is not a punishable one. It would be different if he had followed trayvon into his house, that gives cause. And just because the police tell you to do something and you do the opposite that doesn't mean you get punished for it. At the end of the day it he made a poor decision but he was not the aggressor, no matter how you want to try and spin it.
Reply
+1
User avatar #218 to #217 - desmondxburton (10/24/2015) [-]
I'm not trying to say he is the only one at fault for what happened, both him and Trayvon ****** up that day and it led to what happened. Bad decisions are punishable ones when they lead to a situation where people wind up dead especially when the police tell you not to for your own safety. If you still proceed then that means you are active looking for a confrontation. Just walking on a street is completely different from following someone. Following someone is something you purposely do, so was actively seeking out Trayvon in this situation. That makes him the instigator of the initial contact that provoked Trayvon to (unfortunately) decide escalate the situation to a direct physical confrontation. You keep saying he made a "poor decision" like that somehow doesn't make him responsible for his part in instigating a conflict that could have been easily avoided. All I'm trying to say is that they were both in the wrong and the right to defend yourself does in no way justify what Zimmerman did.
Reply
0
#219 to #218 - mrblankiepoo (10/24/2015) [-]
So you are saying that zimmerman did something illegal? Is following someone on public property illegal? No, its a dick move but it is not something that is punishable. You keep acting like following someone is a crime. It is a bad decision but it did not warrant the confrontation. Had trayvon kept walking and not ambushed the guy which is a crime, it wouldn't of happened. It's not like zimmerman peeled out onto some guys lawn lept out of the car and pointed a gun at the kid. The difference is that zimmerman did nothing that was illegal. It was a poor choice like I said. Why do you think the paparazzi and the media and everyone can tail people and take pictures of them and all of that without going to jail? Because following someone is not a crime.
Reply
+1
User avatar #220 to #219 - desmondxburton (10/24/2015) [-]
"All I'm trying to say is that they were both in the wrong and the right to defend yourself does in no way justify what Zimmerman did."

All I've been doing is explaining how I don't think his actions to be a case of completely justified self defense because of his role in instigating what happened. I think he is guilty of at least Involuntary manslaughter and that Florida's version and most, if not all, other versions of the Stand Your Ground Law are just misguided. Also following someone can sometimes be consider Harassment or stalking, which is what often happens to overzealous paparazzi.
Reply
0
#221 to #220 - mrblankiepoo (10/24/2015) [-]
Yes, overzealous, but following someone is not against the law. So charging someone for a crime in which they did nothing against the law makes no sense. Yes following someone at night is a bad idea, but it is not a crime.
Reply
+1
User avatar #222 to #221 - desmondxburton (10/24/2015) [-]
While some states vary it can be a considered a form of harassment and if repeatedly done stalking, which are both illegal. But of course most of the time you need a restraining order in place before the police really decide to step in.
Reply
0
#223 to #222 - mrblankiepoo (10/24/2015) [-]
And you have to do it repeatedly. Seeing someone in all black out walking around houses at 1 in the morning is why he followed him, those two have never met before that time. Any way you look at it, he did not commit a crime.
Reply
+1
User avatar #224 to #223 - desmondxburton (10/24/2015) [-]
"I don't think his actions to be a case of completely justified self defense because of his role in instigating what happened. I think he is guilty of at least Involuntary manslaughter and that Florida's version and most, if not all, other versions of the Stand Your Ground Law are just misguided."

I have been saying that due to the fact he was following and actively seeking out Trayvon despite warnings not which led to what happened should deny him a proper claim of self defense as he is at least a partial instigator of the conflict. If not for the horrible excuse of a law that is Stand Your Ground he would and should be guilty of at least Involuntary manslaughter.

I'm done replying after this I need sleep and we are clearly not going to change our opinions on this matter. Good night
Reply
0
#225 to #224 - mrblankiepoo (10/24/2015) [-]
The thing is that what you are saying isn't an opinion, it is wrong. If you think that they should change the laws to just walking behind someone is rights to be assaulted, then that is an opinion. But saying Zimmerman should of been convicted on any grounds is just wrong with how the system works today. What you are describing is a world where no one looks out for one another, would you be saying the same thing if a guy was circling a playground looking at the kids and followed him against the advice of the police force? That is a potential threat, and given the same opportunity I would hope anyone would do the same thing. They don't have to confront them or even talk to them but just keeping an eye on them until the cops arrive is what I hope anyone would do.
Reply
-3
#44 to #43 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
"Just because the police tell you to do something doesn't mean you should do it"

LOL but every time I bring up Tamir Rice or John Crawford, FJ attacks me with "all you have to do is literally every single thing a policeman asks of you and you won't get killed lol stupid ******* always trying to start trouble they totally deserved it for disobeying cops which is totally a crime punishable by death."

Ah, America, home of the "free" unless a cop is speaking to you in which case you have virtually no rights, and must do every single thing the cop says, even if what he is saying is illegal.
Reply
+6
#49 to #44 - mrblankiepoo (10/23/2015) [-]
There is a difference between being interrogated by police, and being told something over the phone. You are not under their supervision...... I didn't think that was something that needed to be explained.
Reply
-3
#111 to #44 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
The point is that you don't get yourself killed, then you collect evidence and take the asshat to court.
Reply
+1
User avatar #85 to #42 - Abortedwafflez (10/23/2015) [-]
The bandwagon is thumbing you down cause someone killed a ****** . Even though you're right.
Reply
0
User avatar #122 to #42 - elyiia (10/23/2015) [-]
Forensic evidence corroborated that Zimmerman was attacked, Trayvon was killed during said attack. It doesn't matter if Zimmerman was following him or if the police told him not to, he killed him in self defence ie justifiable homicide.
Reply
0
#110 to #42 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
The whole Tryavon case is sketchy tbh - we don't know enough of the details to know who was in the right and who wasn't. What IS known is that Zimmerman's not the most mentally stable person out there, but also that Trayvon was nowhere near the 'model citizen' that some people made him out to be.
Reply
-3
User avatar #159 to #42 - capricore (10/23/2015) [-]
Yea,the kid got killed before he could be capped by another gangster or be charged somewhat years later for drug trafficking.
Reply
-1
User avatar #107 to #42 - Shiny ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Zimmerman is a ******* pathetic person, but SYG laws are still laws.
Reply
0
User avatar #151 to #39 - bobtombobbob (10/23/2015) [-]
Some fat dude jumps out of a truck cursing and walking towards you and threatening you.
No point in running because he probably has a gun and is looking for blood or a sex slave.
So would you fight or take it in the ass?
Research into Zimmerman he tried pulling that stand your ground ******** on his wife
Reply
+2
#58 to #7 - ronjeremysweiner (10/23/2015) [-]
the word ****** is older than our social struggles faggot
Reply
+1
User avatar #157 to #7 - AztecJew (10/23/2015) [-]
that's an awfully ********* thing to say
Reply
+1
User avatar #53 to #7 - brcstar (10/23/2015) [-]
Haven't seen you in awhile.
Reply
+1
User avatar #38 to #7 - thekieran ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
If you look percapita at the violent crimes against whites from blacks in 2014 alone, you'll find that black on white crime is 450% greater than white on black
Reply
-1
#142 to #7 - holdup (10/23/2015) [-]
****** lover, u like ****** dick in ur mouth don't u?
Reply
0
#210 to #7 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
lol get off the white hate sites and get back to reality
Reply
0
User avatar #154 to #7 - misfitprince (10/23/2015) [-]
Wow, you're being a real ****** .
Reply
0
#148 to #7 - elementfall (10/23/2015) [-]
It's the 23 of October 2013 and people still fail to see you are trolling
Good job,i guess
Reply
0
User avatar #149 to #148 - elementfall (10/23/2015) [-]
**** i meant 2015
Reply
0
#139 to #7 - TheGravyGarcon (10/23/2015) [-]
**TheGravyGarcon used "*roll picture*"**
**TheGravyGarcon rolled image**
While i completely disagree with your comment, props to correct puffin use.
Reply
0
User avatar #125 to #7 - thatonesmartdude (10/23/2015) [-]
****** =/= Black person
****** = Scum who happens to be black

It's just like white trash:
White Trash =/= White person
White Trash = Scum who happens to be white
Reply
+1
User avatar #128 to #125 - elenalkarnur (10/23/2015) [-]
" ****** =/= Black person"
In fact, I've known a lot of white people who are ****** as **** .
Reply
-2
User avatar #118 to #7 - pocketstooheavy (10/23/2015) [-]
When will admin realize that putting negative levels is actually cancer??
Reply
0
#104 to #7 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
You idiot, they call THEMSELVES that, you know that right?
Reply
0
#82 to #7 - slobiscuit (10/23/2015) [-]
**slobiscuit used "*roll picture*"**
**slobiscuit rolled image**"he said ****** so we have to beat him up." only in 'murica
Reply
0
#61 to #7 - partycats (10/23/2015) [-]
You cucked faggot.
Reply
0
User avatar #30 to #7 - cannibalvegan ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
ogdonaldengel? I haven't seen you around for ages.
Reply
-3
User avatar #11 to #7 - ieatpaste (10/23/2015) [-]
i 100% agree with you up untill that amerkkka faggot **** . and i know your a troll
Reply
-1
#197 to #1 - nightmarexnxnxnxnx (10/23/2015) [-]
Finally someone black who GETS IT!
Reply
+6
User avatar #98 to #1 - spunkmckullins (10/23/2015) [-]
They did. As soon as they landed in Africa, they founded Liberia, turned their surrounding tribes into slaves, and became "Little America."

When they entered civil war, and got rid of their luxaries, they became one of the worst nations in the world, ranked globally. Cannibalism is still common over there.
Reply
+9
#75 to #1 - captnnorway (10/23/2015) [-]
>>#38, >>#39, >>#51, >>#58, >>#57, >>#41, >>#8, >>#12,
look at all these faggots falling for a simple troll

MFW writing this comment
Reply
+7
User avatar #54 to #1 - fukatron (10/23/2015) [-]
The difference is there but the logic really isn't. If you look at a history book, you can see blacks trying to integrate, or blend into the system peacefully, and while a very few amount did, a whole ******* **** load of them were still working for white men for **** pay. These people got used to living like **** , being treated like **** , and being **** . Like in a bad relationship, leaving isn't as simple as "Imma get up and leave". Specially during the times of no commercial flights, and the only ships where trade ships that where expensive to use as a means of travel.

I agree that now, there's a huge problem with blacks screaming racism to everything. Just last night i got some dumb ****** trying to cash a money order when there were only me and my manager on shift, and she kept yelling dumb **** ******* would say. I agree with that much, but saying that its their fault for not just up and leaving kind of goes against what most history books have to say.
Reply
-1
#92 to #54 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
They still should have left &
I still think they should get one way boat rides to Africa with a boot up their ass first though
Reply
+4
#146 to #1 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**
All of my yes
Reply
+5
#83 to #1 - affix (10/23/2015) [-]
Somebody had to say it.
Reply
+5
User avatar #200 to #1 - thinemother (10/23/2015) [-]
What is the point in complaining to long dead black people. I assume he's talking about slaves over a hundred years ago when they were freed from white ownership, but why? They were uneducated and had no money, what exactly does he think they can do with that.
We complain that blacks blame us for the choices of our ancestors, and this guy is doing the same thing.
Reply
-1
User avatar #174 to #1 - mydreams (10/23/2015) [-]
all this guy is doing is pandering to white people
Reply
+7
User avatar #176 to #174 - elenalkarnur (10/23/2015) [-]
So by that logic when a black man shoots and kills another black man in the ghetto he's really just sticking it to the white man?
Reply
+2
User avatar #177 to #176 - mydreams (10/23/2015) [-]
What I mean: he's just saying what white people can't say cause of society just so he can be accepted
Reply
+2
User avatar #184 to #177 - kieranbaker (10/23/2015) [-]
so because he agrees with someone, he is pandering because he feels the need to be accepted by an entire race?
Reply
0
User avatar #187 to #184 - mydreams (10/23/2015) [-]
Ask him
Reply
+2
#205 to #174 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
he's not "pandering"
he's just telling the truth
Reply
-2
User avatar #206 to #205 - mydreams (10/23/2015) [-]
plz anon stop plz
Reply
-4
#66 to #1 - selfdenyingbeggar ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
dat white-ass name
Reply
+3
#133 to #1 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
a black guy had to say it to deem it any value
Reply
-8
#167 to #1 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Pls like me white ppl

For the love of god, some people.
Reply
+3
User avatar #105 to #1 - Shiny ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Attempts to mobilize the black community through economic change have ended in assassinations and coverups. It's politically expedient, not an externality.
Reply
-3
User avatar #198 to #1 - velocirapper (10/23/2015) [-]
Blacks created Liberia after they were emancipated
Reply
+6
User avatar #199 to #198 - elenalkarnur (10/23/2015) [-]
Fair enough, but why did only a tiny fraction of the black population go to it and why did it not become a black utopia overflowing with wealth, prosperity, culture, scientific advancement, inventions and industry?

If blacks were really oppressed by whites here, black emigration out of the USA would be a thing, and no whites, not even the most racist, wouldn't ever need to tell any black person to "Go back to Africa!" because they'd already be doing just that.

Instead, whites, being the evil exploiter of blacks that they supposedly are, would have constructed a racial Iron Curtain to keep blacks from going to Liberia or any other West African country.
Reply
+7
User avatar #56 to #1 - TarnRazor (10/23/2015) [-]
I'm sorry but isn't this the kind of **** you'd expect from Tumblr? Gross over-generalizations but more geared towards the patriarchy or white people. How about we don't act like Tumblr?
Reply
+8
#127 to #1 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
... I agree, except the fact that when the slaves were freed most of them were dumber than horse dick and couldn't even read/write let alone speak well enough to get anywhere in a country that had spent decades looking down on them for the most part. There's not a lot of opportunity when you're still dependent on those who brought you there. Yeah you can go back to Africa, but who the **** brings you all of that way, forces you into that life and then says you can randomly go back to your **** whole expecting everyone to hope on. Not to mention a good chunk of those still alive of the time were born in the states.
Reply
+54
User avatar #17 - popcornqueen ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
My hometown got electricity in 1895 because a woman was going around the country building and operating power plants. I just think this is cool. Her name was Iva E. Tutt, if anyone cares.
Reply
+1
User avatar #194 to #17 - kingbulbasaur ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
That's pretty cool. Big ups to you for knowing something about your local lore.
Reply
+4
User avatar #18 to #17 - gunmandude ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
I think that is pretty cool.
Reply
+5
User avatar #73 to #17 - nintendolover (10/23/2015) [-]
Iva E. Tutt was a pretty cool dude.
Reply
+2
#88 to #73 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Ivana sukamanov
Reply
+85
#21 - ablock (10/23/2015) [-]
Lol, bitch, if men are incompetent and are still the dominant sex, what the **** does that make women?
0
#23 to #21 - CrowbarNinja has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+16
User avatar #79 - sphincterface (10/23/2015) [-]
On a more serious note, I honestly think it's the tension and divide that the media creates. RIch vs Poor, Democrat vs Republican, White vs Black, Religion vs Science, Religion vs Religion.

All these groups that I listed usually have had a reputation of working together very well in the past, but the problem is that the media just feeds off the potential fear between one another that it leads to hatred and blaming one another for things that honestly is everybody's fault.
Reply
+1
#86 to #79 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
WHO RUNS THE MEDIA...
Reply
+1
#93 to #79 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Pitting alleged oppressed and oppressor groups against each other is a Marxist tactic, Marxism is a Jewish creation, Jews own the media.
Reply
+4
#116 to #93 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Marxism was created by a German and an Englishman, neither of whom were Jews as far as I'm aware. Of course neither of them actually believed that the theory would work, as it was just socioeconomic conjecture. Too bad the likes of Lenin and Mao never got the message.
Reply
+1
User avatar #215 to #116 - sphincterface (10/24/2015) [-]
Also, pretty sure Karl Marx was atheist.
Reply
+14
#99 - atrocitustheking (10/23/2015) [-]
Newsflash: Dumb bitches exist. It's not a conspiracy, it's just that the internet has given a voice to people with no brains.
Reply
+4
User avatar #121 - scorcho (10/23/2015) [-]
why can't we just treat race like we treat hair- or eyecolour?
Reply
-1
User avatar #226 to #131 - scorcho (10/24/2015) [-]
i meant for people, obviously.
Reply
-1
User avatar #143 to #131 - guanyu (10/23/2015) [-]
Touché.
Reply
+6
#71 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
>Ignorant [People of color]
>Clearly a white bitch

No thanks, ya'll can keep her.
Reply
+5
#172 - bioconstriculative (10/23/2015) [-]
>White people are the barrier to innovation.

Yeah, that must be why white people had developed guns, motors, electricity, and rail systems by the 1700's, while the oogaboogas down in Africa had an entire untouched continent full of natural resources at their disposal but were still throwing spears at each other.

******* white apologists.
Reply
+26
#29 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
And in the comments, we have a bunch of basement dwellers circle-jerking about the achievements of people who they have no relation to.

I finally get it you know, people circle jerk about this stuff because it's they only thing they can be proud of since they're worthless ******* losers themselves.
0
#52 to #29 - itssakamoto has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
-2
#94 to #29 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Why do you say FJ is circle jerking? Seriously, **** off edge lord. They're laughing at an idiotic statement. The same way FJ would mock someone who said the world was flat.
Reply
+5
#31 to #29 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Talk **** and you get it back, especially when you're ******* wrong. If you don't like seeing people discuss why something is full of **** , try to encourage people to be less full of **** .
Reply
+1
User avatar #32 to #31 - gabemczombie (10/23/2015) [-]
Are the people in the comments encouraging POC or SJWs to be less full of **** ?
Reply
+2
User avatar #47 to #32 - kalagas (10/23/2015) [-]
I kind of agree with your intentions, but there is no way to convince these kinds of people. It's like a damn cult following, that SJW movement. People who are capable of seeing and accepting reason don't join such a movement, simple as that. It's like a quote I saw before, goes something like "naive is the one who thinks they can battle with someone who deals in extremes without you yourself using extremes". I dunno, something like that, but you get the gist of it.
Reply
0
User avatar #76 to #47 - gabemczombie (10/23/2015) [-]
That i do. Some people are lost.
Reply
0
#46 to #32 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
No, but they aren't bitching, either. They're laughing at them and mocking them. It's the whiners jobs to change things. I'm fine with people being idiots for me to laugh at.
Reply
0
#129 to #31 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Haha why am I wrong? I see no circle jerking, I see no " people who share my ethnicity invent things, therefore I can claim that as my own." I see reasonable people debunking and mockong a racist moron. Now I see another moron bitching about " muh FJ circle jerk, fookin right wingurs". Ironic that everytime one of you edgy ******* blurts that statement out, you get a **** ton of green thumbs.... sounds like a circle jerk to me.
Reply
+3
User avatar #201 - Tyranitar (10/23/2015) [-]
This might sound racist, but I do believe that if everybody woke up one day to find that all white people had vanished or died, humanity would die out in a matter of months.
Reply
+1
User avatar #207 to #201 - dfgthree (10/23/2015) [-]
I'm not racist either, but I do agree with you on that
Reply
+3
User avatar #55 - TarnRazor (10/23/2015) [-]
I hate how these people have corrupted most of the civil rights movements. They use backwards logic to justify **** that doesn't make sense. Racism is bad and all races are equal but all white people are horrible. Sexism is bad and the sexes are equal but men are pigs. The list goes on with classism, homophobia, transphobia etc. It makes me so pissed because they're inhibiting the movements for the very real and awful oppression of the oppressed in lesser developed countries worldwide. Yes there are discriminatory problems everywhere towards and from people of all social demographics but try to focus on the big picture here...
Reply
+2
#182 - manholefreddy (10/23/2015) [-]
**manholefreddy used "*roll picture*"**
**manholefreddy rolled image**

Latinos invented yo-yos and jetpacks. Just sayin...
Reply
+2
User avatar #136 - blahblahblahblaaaa (10/23/2015) [-]
its all human accomplishments....tribalism is what prevents people from sharing in the glory of being a human being in the first place
Reply
0
User avatar #140 to #136 - xgrandmoffx (10/23/2015) [-]
Or at least from a national mindset by which one can accomplish lasting things.
Reply
0
User avatar #145 to #140 - blahblahblahblaaaa (10/23/2015) [-]
its all just a derivative of tribalism... seems we have an instinctual need to separate groups of people for any reason, which from a primal view is an attempt to predict behavior.
Reply
0
User avatar #150 to #145 - xgrandmoffx (10/23/2015) [-]
But in a tribal culture, lawlessness gives way to unreasoned hatred of all other tribes or groups, which leads to constant warfare without just cause. In a national civilization, we obey leaders, who can deal with the leaders of other peoples. Thus cooler heads prevail, and even when conflict is inevitable, we are orderly and turn our energies to competition rather than war.
Reply
0
User avatar #152 to #150 - blahblahblahblaaaa (10/23/2015) [-]
they are fundamentally the same, since they are a result of the same tendency to separate social groups based on abstract details. not much debate, it's been useful for our survival as a species and has become a competitive playing field in modern times.
Reply
+1
User avatar #65 - mrnaanbread (10/23/2015) [-]
idk, i think we have africa and china to thank for starting civilisation up, then europeans for creating modern western civilisation, and now japan for creating all the best technology
Reply
0
User avatar #164 to #65 - dorfdorfdorf (10/23/2015) [-]
what's some tech that japan actually innovated?
Reply
0
User avatar #188 to #65 - kibbleking (10/23/2015) [-]
Wrong. They might have been advanced at their time but all civilizations started independently.
Reply
+2
User avatar #69 to #65 - thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
>thank africa for starting civilization up

Not sure we can really do that, Africa is a huge continent where that statement can be so applied to very little of it.
Reply
+3
User avatar #70 to #69 - mrnaanbread (10/23/2015) [-]
well the first humans built tribes in the south and east of africa, these tribes spread and travelled throughout the continent. its generally considered that around this time philosophy, science, music, hunting, agriculture and complex cooking was devised. then egypt became the only large civilastion and lasted for about 2000 years before anyone else came along
Reply
+1
User avatar #74 to #70 - thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Yeah, most of that developed in Northern Africa, North East specifically for the majority of it.

Ancient Nubian, Ethiopian tribes for example - or West African tribes primarily living a nomadic hunter-gatherer life style. Then you had ancient cultures that lived in Egypt.

The issue I more or less have with a statement, is well, you said it yourself. "these tribes spread and traveled throughout the continent." They didn't just travel throughout the continent, they traveled outside of the continent into the Middle East forming agrarian communities along the Tigris and Euphrates for example (Mesopotamia.)

It's hard to claim one group of people started civilization up, especially when you consider civilization is a very vague and interpreted word. Not to mention one has to subscribe to the Out of Africa hypothesis first, as some find believe in a multiregional hypothesis.
Reply
0
User avatar #189 to #70 - kibbleking (10/23/2015) [-]
Agriculture was devised in the middle east first.
Reply
+2
#26 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
I mean...if white men are so incompetent then how pathetic must women be to be "dominated" by them?
Reply
+1
#192 - anon (10/23/2015) [-]
Reply
+1
User avatar #179 - stealingbikes (10/23/2015) [-]
Damn I thought it was illegal to own a ****** like that nowadays
Reply
+1
User avatar #168 - MrMustacho (10/23/2015) [-]
imagine how much male scientists could get done without women PMSing all over the place
Reply
+1
#161 - dorg ONLINE (10/23/2015) [-]
Question: What is the biggest barrier to innovation in the United States?
Answer: The dominance and incompetence of black women.

Exactly as racist and sexist as the original post. These ******* are just as racist/sexist as any white supremacist/misogynist.
Reply
+1
User avatar #186 to #161 - kibbleking (10/23/2015) [-]
Except black women aren't even dominant in their own cultures.
Reply
0
User avatar #227 to #186 - dorg ONLINE (10/24/2015) [-]
My point still remains, just insert: social/racial group + gender
12>
[ 225 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)