White Countries
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
83 comments displayed.
#2
-
chaosraptor (12/23/2015) [-] **chaosraptor rolled user antibronywiseman ** will be the cause for WW3
#20 to #4
-
chaosraptor (12/24/2015) [-] youre here to kill bronies
if we need a war to do it... so be it
if we need a war to do it... so be it
#39 to #36
-
chaosraptor (12/24/2015) [-] how about sending them to russia
their labor camps could benefit from more workers
their labor camps could benefit from more workers
#42 to #40
-
chaosraptor (12/24/2015) [-] hell
between 1920-1950, soviet labor camps built 9 new cites and a ******** of roads, railways and factories
imagine doing that again with expendable bronies
between 1920-1950, soviet labor camps built 9 new cites and a ******** of roads, railways and factories
imagine doing that again with expendable bronies
#3
-
notthedoctor (12/23/2015) [-] but white people are evil and all the other races are just misunderstood
#25 to #3
-
pretaxorpheus (12/24/2015) [-]
a black girl sang this song, and you're using it to describe white people, just sayin.
#46 to #25
-
worldatarms (12/24/2015) [-] Was a white Orphan so unbelievable these days that they had to change her to black
#45 to #30
-
mewoveyouwongtime (12/24/2015) [-] The version that is used in the video is from that 2014 remake with Jamie Foxx and Cameron Diaz, so technically he is correct
#63 to #45
-
distortedflare ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] And as always being lazy pieces of **** they are Ironic given most SJW have art degrees. rather than create something new with black characters they take old movies that were good or had white people in them and add minorities. Why because they are cunts.
#69 to #45
-
dragonzard (12/24/2015) [-] Tell me why I always see that movie at Walmart and I always thought it was a "Community" Christmas Special/.
#9 to #3
-
sgtmajjohnson ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] Of course; despite the fact that the Japanese during that war behaved with more savagery than any other population I know of, it's always whites who are to blame. Hell, if someone from another race commits a crime, it's white people's fault for building their society that way.
#8
-
sgtmajjohnson ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] Not to mention the fact that (while they weren't a belligerent nation) a large portion of Nazi war criminals fled to Argentina, which as we all know is not white.
#14 to #8
-
anon (12/24/2015) [-]
**** you! Argentina whiter than your euro ass getting raped by *********** and gays
#15 to #8
-
asdasdzxczxc (12/24/2015) [-] But now Argentina is white again, thanks to based Macri-sama winning the elections
#53 to #8
-
lastgentleman (12/24/2015) [-] I love that picture so much,brought me to tears holy ****
#12
-
Darianvincent (12/24/2015) [-] Can anyone who's studied WW2 explain why despite Japan doing the same level of atrocities the Germans did in the war, nobody really cares? Is it because they never bring it up like the Germans do?
#58 to #12
-
thechosentroll (12/24/2015) [-] Cause genocide has been a nifty tool of war and almost considered normal everywhere east of Poland. The nips committed acts of genocide against the chinese, the chinese did it to pretty much everyone, south and north korea were doing it to eachother, **** if I know what Taiwan was doing, but I'm gonna assume they commited some acts of genocide as well. It's almost mundane in regions where everyone hates everyone and fights 8 wars over a hill. It's the same **** over here in the Balkans. From what I've counted, my country(Bulgaria) has committed around 3 acts of genocide in the past couple of centuries, pretty much everyone's around that number, Greece is a bit higher, Turkey's the champion because they do it to eachother and they're currently committing acts of genocide as we speak in certain regions of their own country. It's considered almost mundane, which is ******* horrifying, but still how things work.
If you wanna get /pol/-y about it, you could also factor in the number of large media companies owned by someone whos' name ends in "berg" or "stein". Tragedy sells, especially if it's one as big as that one and no one's going to accuse you of milking it, because it's "your" tragedy.
If you wanna get /pol/-y about it, you could also factor in the number of large media companies owned by someone whos' name ends in "berg" or "stein". Tragedy sells, especially if it's one as big as that one and no one's going to accuse you of milking it, because it's "your" tragedy.
#23 to #12
-
zerpderp (12/24/2015) [-] We really couldn't do much to the japanese generals in charge since most of them pussed out and fled into the more rural areas and took on the disguise of farmers kinda hard to pick one dude out when they all look the same. We couldn't take it out on the emperor because the **** storm that would happen plus the power vacuum Toho took most the blame and did rat out some generals there's a movie on with tommy lee jones was pretty good. Though if i remember correctly the main reason we basically let japan slide was because china had been taken over by Mao turning it from a democracy or whatever it was back then i can't remember to communism and with Mao being the largest powerhouse in Asia and backed by Stalin leaving them alone would have spelt doom for most of Asia so the US overlooked the all the **** Japan did and basically used them as a FOB in case Mao decided to try and take over Asia.
#13 to #12
-
ilovehitler (12/24/2015) [-] The Nazi war crimes are far more discussed and spread around, and the German government makes no attempt to hide the fact that those atrocities were committed. Hitler has kind of become the face of the Axis, despite Mussolini and Tojo also being parts of it.
Also, the Nazi ideals still live on in a lot of people today, so we can still see it as a danger- despite the fact that the Neo-Nazis would most certainly be considered degenerate by the Third Reich, they still believe that it should rule on. Probably because they're not known for their intellect. The Jews have pretty much always been hated, and the Nazi Party, and now the Neo-Nazis, put a face on the hatred. Thus, the German atrocities are remembered.
Anyways, the Japs are much more hidden about their war crimes, don't like to announce it nearly as much, and there aren't really any major movements to try and bring back what they did.
Also, the Nazi ideals still live on in a lot of people today, so we can still see it as a danger- despite the fact that the Neo-Nazis would most certainly be considered degenerate by the Third Reich, they still believe that it should rule on. Probably because they're not known for their intellect. The Jews have pretty much always been hated, and the Nazi Party, and now the Neo-Nazis, put a face on the hatred. Thus, the German atrocities are remembered.
Anyways, the Japs are much more hidden about their war crimes, don't like to announce it nearly as much, and there aren't really any major movements to try and bring back what they did.
#16 to #13
-
Darianvincent (12/24/2015) [-] That does make sense, I can't even think of a face for the Japanese as a whole during that time. But when you think of germany then you instantly think of Hitler.
#17 to #16
-
ilovehitler (12/24/2015) [-] Yeah, everyone can pretty easily conjure up an image of Hitler or Stalin, but Tojo and Mussolini aren't as well known faces.
#18 to #13
-
nickelakon (12/24/2015) [-] Also we probably feel a little bad about nuking them twice.
Its still debated whether it was really necessary (though I believe it was)
Its still debated whether it was really necessary (though I believe it was)
#19 to #18
-
ilovehitler (12/24/2015) [-] I'm not convinced that it's guilt at play here- according the statistics taken by the Gallup Polls since 1945, there has always been a majority of United States Citizens supporting the bombing.
I think the biggest problem is education- we learn so much more about the Nazis than the Japs.
I think the biggest problem is education- we learn so much more about the Nazis than the Japs.
#21 to #19
-
nickelakon (12/24/2015) [-] Yes but there are those people
And also, at the time the president who made the call was new, when it happened most people really didn't know what to think about it.
Even though it is a minority its enough and spoken enough people to be encountered even today.
I also agree on that, the only reason I know about what the japanese did was because one day while covering ww2, my history teacher made all of us close our books and told us
"You probably won't hear this unless you actually look for yourself online, because it won't be in any history text book you get in school..." and basically told us about what japan was like at the time and about their invasion of china and everything.
What they did was something that if more people knew, I doubt Hitler would be the race of evil from ww2.
And also, at the time the president who made the call was new, when it happened most people really didn't know what to think about it.
Even though it is a minority its enough and spoken enough people to be encountered even today.
I also agree on that, the only reason I know about what the japanese did was because one day while covering ww2, my history teacher made all of us close our books and told us
"You probably won't hear this unless you actually look for yourself online, because it won't be in any history text book you get in school..." and basically told us about what japan was like at the time and about their invasion of china and everything.
What they did was something that if more people knew, I doubt Hitler would be the race of evil from ww2.
#27
-
failtolawl (12/24/2015) [-] I can't agree with world war 2 on that first statement, but world war 1 only included non-white countries because they were either colonies (aka forced) or they wanted some credibility by joining Europeans war. There was a reason it was called European war by many nations.
#62 to #38
-
thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] I was gonna say...Mr. Smarty kind of forgot a big puzzle piece.
Not to mention his assumptions are incredibly simple. Assuming that they were looking for credibility over 100 other reasons to pick a side. What about the Saudis - Nejd and **** - they allied with the British because of having a common enemy - the Ottomans. Not because they were forced or "wanted some credibility."
Not to mention his assumptions are incredibly simple. Assuming that they were looking for credibility over 100 other reasons to pick a side. What about the Saudis - Nejd and **** - they allied with the British because of having a common enemy - the Ottomans. Not because they were forced or "wanted some credibility."
#32
-
saltyfries (12/24/2015) [-] What I find interesting is how or why Japan attacked the US knowing full well they just made the USA ******* mad as hell.
Look at Japan's forces at the time, their weapons were inconsistent (their main rifle was the only thing good they had), their most produced tank was weaker than an M5/M3 Stuart Light tank, their biggest strongest tanks had no gas and were sitting ducks due to the oil embargo. The only thing Japan had going for them was their Air Force (kamikazes) and Navy.
I'll give Japan a few things, they were tenacious as hell, they would fight until their last breath due to their propaganda. They obviously knew their territory well to find great sniper spots, and lets not forget their hiding spots on the ground.
Japan in the end though, was outgunned, out tanked, and out navy'd by our kickass rebuilt Navy.
If an M5/M3 Stuart could penetrate your tanks, you dun ****** up.
Look at Japan's forces at the time, their weapons were inconsistent (their main rifle was the only thing good they had), their most produced tank was weaker than an M5/M3 Stuart Light tank, their biggest strongest tanks had no gas and were sitting ducks due to the oil embargo. The only thing Japan had going for them was their Air Force (kamikazes) and Navy.
I'll give Japan a few things, they were tenacious as hell, they would fight until their last breath due to their propaganda. They obviously knew their territory well to find great sniper spots, and lets not forget their hiding spots on the ground.
Japan in the end though, was outgunned, out tanked, and out navy'd by our kickass rebuilt Navy.
If an M5/M3 Stuart could penetrate your tanks, you dun ****** up.
#48 to #32
-
tonicwater ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] I maintain that if Japan had landed troops on PH and took it, they could have knocked the US out of the Pacific.
#82 to #32
-
anon (12/24/2015) [-]
Oil embargoes on Japan and the freezing of all Japanese assets by Roosevelt.
Basically Japan wanted to control the Pacific Ocean, and the US didn't want to have any part of that. So Japan got mad and decided that they needed to take out the US naval presence in the Pacific. So they launched a "surprise" attack on Pearl Harbor (that the US could and should have easily been ready for, given that the leadership was talking about the possibility of the attack long beforehand), in hopes that this would dissuade the US from interfering in the Pacific. Protip: it didn't. Don't piss off white people. They crazy.
Basically Japan wanted to control the Pacific Ocean, and the US didn't want to have any part of that. So Japan got mad and decided that they needed to take out the US naval presence in the Pacific. So they launched a "surprise" attack on Pearl Harbor (that the US could and should have easily been ready for, given that the leadership was talking about the possibility of the attack long beforehand), in hopes that this would dissuade the US from interfering in the Pacific. Protip: it didn't. Don't piss off white people. They crazy.
#83 to #32
-
panzerfront (12/24/2015) [-]
Eh the primary tanks of the Japanese army were the Chi-Ha and the Ha-Go. given the Stuart outclassed the Ha-Go, it was from the twenties while the Stuart was from the late thirties if the Stuart didn't outclass it, that would be a problem.
now the Chi-Ha, which when they declared war on us, most would be Shinto, version, would beat the snot out of a stuart, with its high velocity 47 and decent (for its weight class) armor. The better tanks of the Japanese army, the Chi-He and Chi-Nu would make a nasty mess of a Stuart and the Chi-Nu could could fight Shermans and Lees with a high chance of coming out on top. Thats without the Japs making things like the Chi-Ri with its belt feed 75mm automatic cannon. That would butcher even Easy Eight shermans and would have required Pershing's to kill.
The Japs just didn't have enough resources or emphasis on tanks to produce good ones in sufficient quantity.
now the Chi-Ha, which when they declared war on us, most would be Shinto, version, would beat the snot out of a stuart, with its high velocity 47 and decent (for its weight class) armor. The better tanks of the Japanese army, the Chi-He and Chi-Nu would make a nasty mess of a Stuart and the Chi-Nu could could fight Shermans and Lees with a high chance of coming out on top. Thats without the Japs making things like the Chi-Ri with its belt feed 75mm automatic cannon. That would butcher even Easy Eight shermans and would have required Pershing's to kill.
The Japs just didn't have enough resources or emphasis on tanks to produce good ones in sufficient quantity.
#50 to #32
-
blahblahblahblaaaa ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] oh look a peasant entertaining his simpleton thoughts with other peasants
#35 to #32
-
deadagain ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-]
They knew that America was inevitably gonna go to war, and that when that happened, hundreds of American ships would soon be swarming the Pacific, and they would have to fight a war of attrition. At the time, the Japs had a vastly superior navy, and took a gamble, planning to fight a defensive war while they consolidated their power in Asia.
#56 to #32
-
gffishdragon (12/24/2015) [-]
To my understanding, there were a couple of reasons. Firstly, a war between Japan and the US had been brewing for years over control of the pacific, so they wanted to strike first and gain the upper hand quickly by destroying the US's ability to properly respond(had the attack on PH been completely successful). Secondly, they knew that they could never win an elongated war with the US but they figured in the time it would take the US Navy to get a proper fighting force back into the pacific, they would be able to take control of many of the island nations/territories there and make them more trouble than they were worth to take back. This would put them in a stronger bargaining position when it came time to sign a peace treaty that would expand their holdings more permanently.
#34 to #32
-
subaqueousreach (12/24/2015) [-] The US was interfering with Japan's national affairs and slapped a trade embargo on them while the rest of the world was shooting at each other. For very obvious reasons Japan got mad and bombed the **** out of pearl harbor.
#60 to #34
-
thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] More like Japan was interfering with affairs between China, the United States, and European powers.
I suggest you google this thing called the Open Door Policy, and then go google the various Japanese invasions of Chinese lands and French Indo-China and come back and tell me the U.S. was "interfering with Japan's national affairs." That **** was straight the otherway around.
I suggest you google this thing called the Open Door Policy, and then go google the various Japanese invasions of Chinese lands and French Indo-China and come back and tell me the U.S. was "interfering with Japan's national affairs." That **** was straight the otherway around.
#54 to #32
-
ganjalf (12/24/2015) [-] Consider this.
1) US imposed an embargo on Japan. This meant no oil, no steel, no coal, nothing.
For a nation like Japan this means the death of industry. Without industry, a modern econony simply collapses. Moreover, japan was occupying China at the time, and needed replacements for tanks, weapons, ammos but MOST IMPORTANTLY ships.
Ships were main strenght of the japanese empire at the time..
2) Japan attacked the US to solve all these problems at once. While they were bombing Pearl Harbor, they were also invading the southern pacific, gaining lands full of natural resources to sustain their industries.
They of course knew that would piss of the US, who had interest in the philippines, so, since they had to, why not go all out?
3) An attack on pearl Harbor, like they intended it, would have meant an incapacitation of the Americans to do anything at all. It was by sheer luck that that day all americans aircraft carriers were out at sea instead of in port.
Consider this: WITH the carriers it took the US 2 years to start a counterattack, and it was only the presence of these carriers that prevented a japanese invasion of US mainland. Imagine what a total wipeout could have meant.
4) About tanks and other things, they weren't useless against american lights BUT the key to sea domination are ships and airplanes, which you just admitted were their main points. Also fighting space on the small islands of the Pacific is limited, the americans couldn't use their tank's numerical advantage, or their heaviest tanks in the tropical forests and muddy swamplands.
Sorry for the wall of text.
1) US imposed an embargo on Japan. This meant no oil, no steel, no coal, nothing.
For a nation like Japan this means the death of industry. Without industry, a modern econony simply collapses. Moreover, japan was occupying China at the time, and needed replacements for tanks, weapons, ammos but MOST IMPORTANTLY ships.
Ships were main strenght of the japanese empire at the time..
2) Japan attacked the US to solve all these problems at once. While they were bombing Pearl Harbor, they were also invading the southern pacific, gaining lands full of natural resources to sustain their industries.
They of course knew that would piss of the US, who had interest in the philippines, so, since they had to, why not go all out?
3) An attack on pearl Harbor, like they intended it, would have meant an incapacitation of the Americans to do anything at all. It was by sheer luck that that day all americans aircraft carriers were out at sea instead of in port.
Consider this: WITH the carriers it took the US 2 years to start a counterattack, and it was only the presence of these carriers that prevented a japanese invasion of US mainland. Imagine what a total wipeout could have meant.
4) About tanks and other things, they weren't useless against american lights BUT the key to sea domination are ships and airplanes, which you just admitted were their main points. Also fighting space on the small islands of the Pacific is limited, the americans couldn't use their tank's numerical advantage, or their heaviest tanks in the tropical forests and muddy swamplands.
Sorry for the wall of text.
#59 to #54
-
thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] Not that you are trying to justify this, but before someone walks through here and whines about American imperialism - one does need to remember that the reason these embargos were placed on Imperial Japan was because of their aggression and imperialism in China.
Years and years back through the use of American diplomacy and European powers that were capable and willing to listen constructed the Open Door Policy for China - guaranteeing fair and equal trade use of Chinese ports, cities, and resources by all nations - preventing a monopolised sphere around China by a single nation.
Obviously ever since Japan made its way into Korea and then into Manchuria that policy began to look more and more grieve as the days went by, prompting the United States to embargo the Japanese, and understanding that point of view - rightfully so.
Years and years back through the use of American diplomacy and European powers that were capable and willing to listen constructed the Open Door Policy for China - guaranteeing fair and equal trade use of Chinese ports, cities, and resources by all nations - preventing a monopolised sphere around China by a single nation.
Obviously ever since Japan made its way into Korea and then into Manchuria that policy began to look more and more grieve as the days went by, prompting the United States to embargo the Japanese, and understanding that point of view - rightfully so.
#31
-
tagme (12/24/2015) [-]
Then why don't we hear about them? When I was in school, the only country we heard about in either of the World Wars that wasn't in Europe not counting Russia since, as far as I know, all of it's fighting was done on it's European part, not too much fighting in Siberia or the USA was Japan, and that's just because of Pearl Harbor and the end of WWII. I always though it was because the other countries did **** all during the wars.
#33 to #31
-
teamrocketninja (12/24/2015) [-] Not as much happened there. Think back. Any of them known for great armies at the time?
#37 to #31
-
barstoolninja (12/24/2015) [-]
Really? Didn't you at least hear about the fighting in Africa with Rommel and stuff?
I mean, it was major enough to warrant a few levels in the Medal of honor and call of duty games and a few old movies about it. Hell, didn't you ever see indiana jones? Where the hell you think those old egyptian ruins they were fighting nazis in were? The Alps?
I mean, it was major enough to warrant a few levels in the Medal of honor and call of duty games and a few old movies about it. Hell, didn't you ever see indiana jones? Where the hell you think those old egyptian ruins they were fighting nazis in were? The Alps?
#52
-
SognaVetr (12/24/2015) [-] Let's also not forget Algeria, Tunisia, Singapore, Malasyia, Argentina (lol), ...
#72 to #67
-
brothergrimm (12/24/2015) [-] Dude....... Africa is a continent you simple creature....
#79 to #78
-
brothergrimm (12/24/2015) [-] I'm normally pretty good at recognizing **** like that, but If that was mean to be a joke, it's a pretty terrible one.
#55
-
frutus ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] >heavily pigmented person
>expected to know history
they still believe that white pilgrims literally kidnapped tribes people in africa and forced them into slavery
they believe Treyvon Martin dindu nuffin
>expected to know history
they still believe that white pilgrims literally kidnapped tribes people in africa and forced them into slavery
they believe Treyvon Martin dindu nuffin
#71
-
freed (12/24/2015) [-] The funny thing is that most of the countries mentioned had been under white rule. See Brittish empire, French Democratic empire and Italy had Libya. The world wars had europe as a centerpoint and extended to the rest of the world according to European leaders.
Except Japan who was the most "Westernized" Eastern Country. Most of Asia, Africa and South America were colonies. Colonies stopped being a thing with the Vietnam war.
Except Japan who was the most "Westernized" Eastern Country. Most of Asia, Africa and South America were colonies. Colonies stopped being a thing with the Vietnam war.
#64
-
phunkyzilla (12/24/2015) [-] And Russia. not everyone in russia is Caucasian, the people in Kazakhstan are mostly of Hun decendence
#49
-
blahblahblahblaaaa ONLINE (12/24/2015) [-] why are they called world wars when really its just a hand full of brass handing out death sentences to a bunch of innocent bystanders
