Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(124):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 124 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
110 comments displayed.
Reply
+32
#26 - feindmachines (06/19/2015) [-]
**feindmachines used "*roll picture*"**
**feindmachines rolled image** god choose me to call you all faggots and roll this picture, this picture is GOD'S hand picked picture.
Reply
+27
#28 to #26 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**

God wants everybody to know how to multiply large numbers in your head?
Reply
+13
User avatar #34 to #28 - yugiohkris (06/19/2015) [-]
hey >>#6 check this out
Reply
+9
#40 to #34 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
Holy **** , we're getting somewhere...
Reply
+6
User avatar #30 to #28 - feindmachines (06/19/2015) [-]
and also god wants people to know about the nation of joe.
Reply
+4
#48 to #28 - itachijebest (06/19/2015) [-]
Futurama Season 5 episode 13 "Bend her"

gif closest to people noding
Reply
+52
User avatar #6 - semenslurpinglily (06/18/2015) [-]
"Humans are corruptible, facts aren't. That's why you should never trust a priest when you have a bible at hand."
-Homeless dude called Joe who was super cool, gave him a sandwich.
Reply
0
User avatar #82 to #6 - EvildidlivE (06/19/2015) [-]
Lets see if I can explain why I don't like "facts" in that quote...

A fact is defined as an something taken as the indisputable case. But that's still subject to what individuals accept as 'the indisputable case'. If you ask any fanatical religious person what they view as fact, they'd put their religious doctrine as fact -- their life has led them to make that correlation.

Evidence, I believe, is more tangible, and less susceptible to belief. You don't need to appeal to what other people believe to be fact; you can wave evidence right in their face - the only counter to which, is other evidence.

I feel 'evidence' is a better word to use in that statement is what I'm getting at.
Reply
+1
#77 to #6 - baim (06/19/2015) [-]
is ... that you joe?
Reply
+2
User avatar #73 to #6 - italianfrosttroll (06/19/2015) [-]
>facts
>bible
Pick one.
Reply
+2
User avatar #100 to #95 - italianfrosttroll (06/19/2015) [-]
Dog I ain't sayin religious eople aren'tsmart. I'm saying the bible has some dense fables. Wipe the sand out f our pussyand lose the salt.
Reply
0
User avatar #89 to #73 - domny (06/19/2015) [-]
at least he had the right idea.
Reply
+29
User avatar #8 to #6 - demandsgayversion (06/18/2015) [-]
Humans wrote the bible
Reply
+35
User avatar #9 to #8 - semenslurpinglily (06/18/2015) [-]
You dare go against the word of Joe?
Reply
+14
User avatar #10 to #9 - demandsgayversion (06/18/2015) [-]
Joe was a human
Reply
+25
User avatar #13 to #10 - xgeneration (06/19/2015) [-]
Joe was a hobo
Reply
+9
User avatar #19 to #13 - demandsgayversion (06/19/2015) [-]
Joe multiclassed with at least one level as a human.
Reply
+4
User avatar #18 to #10 - italianfrosttroll (06/19/2015) [-]
You shall be smitten in the name of Joe, for he is all we aspire for. He is the righteous force which feeds us with the knowledge and power to defeat his foes. We are the will of Joe, and Joe's will shalle be swift and brutal. To the weak who have been tainted he shall show mercy with death, but to the unholy and evil there shall be none.
Reply
+64
User avatar #3 to #1 - reican (06/18/2015) [-]
more like, " you threw a pebble"
Reply
+35
#58 to #3 - fffffffuuuuuuuuuuu (06/19/2015) [-]
Did you say pebble?
Reply
+4
#78 to #3 - xgolgothax (06/19/2015) [-]
No, they were actual rockets.
Reply
-21
#4 to #3 - anon (06/18/2015) [-]
More like, you invaded a country.
Reply
+61
User avatar #5 to #4 - reican (06/18/2015) [-]
*jewing intensifies*
Reply
+46
#7 to #4 - anon (06/18/2015) [-]
found the kike
Reply
+7
User avatar #21 to #7 - commissarcrunch (06/19/2015) [-]
found the /pol/
Reply
0
User avatar #87 to #21 - domny (06/19/2015) [-]
you say that like its a bad thing
Reply
+15
#35 to #4 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
>palestinians
>invading a country

oh
Reply
+82
#2 - tmdarby (06/18/2015) [-]
Reply
+3
User avatar #74 to #2 - pkman (06/19/2015) [-]
That looks like a kid in fallout brought to life with dark magic
Reply
+7
#20 to #2 - cptbajusz (06/19/2015) [-]
Calm down,Ramsay!
Reply
+9
#11 to #2 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
Holy **** its bubba j without the jew nose.
Reply
+6
User avatar #12 to #11 - prohibullion (06/19/2015) [-]
nahson, that's alfred e. neuman
Reply
+4
#59 - kneegrowphiliac (06/19/2015) [-]
God doesn't have enough badges to boss me around.
Reply
+5
User avatar #14 - yunoknow (06/19/2015) [-]
If there is a God, then God made us the smartest species on this planet for a reason. Don't squander it over some ******* idiotic books.
Reply
+1
#86 to #14 - senorfrog (06/19/2015) [-]
The books aren't the problem, it's the people reading the books. The bible (ex catholic, going with what I know) is just a book of stories that have bigger meanings. It's similar to Charlie and the chocolate factory telling us not to be a glutton kid like augustus or not to be an arrogant bitch like violet or whover the nut girl was. But the problem is people read those books and follow the words strictly, so we get people looking for oompa loompas or the chocolate factory instead of not being a dick.
Reply
0
#36 to #14 - tarabostes (06/19/2015) [-]
Did you just call the Bible, Torah and the Quran ******* idiotic books?
Reply
0
User avatar #103 to #36 - yunoknow (06/19/2015) [-]
As works of philosophy, they're less than adequate. On teaching morality, each are severely outdated. On recounting history, more often fictional than true. There are bits and pieces of each religion that are enlightening to mankind, but you don't find those in these texts anymore. So yes, the books are dumb. We as believers shape our religion, and we decide what we become. We can thank our forefathers for leading the way, but don't let someone dead for millenia decide what's right or wrong today.
Reply
0
#104 to #103 - tarabostes (06/19/2015) [-]
Of course you decide for yourself what's right or wrong , but they have some very good teachings , just because science wasn't advanced at all when they were written doesn't mean they're dumb...
Reply
0
User avatar #107 to #104 - yunoknow (06/19/2015) [-]
Yes, I agree there are essences from Biblical stories that teach profound morals, but there are also a lot of laws and rules specific to a certain time period. Coming from before modern science isn't a valid excuse either when there are schools of thought that have persisted for much, much longer that are still universally applicable to many cultures today, such as Confucianism in East Asia. Do we have to declare every fable as scripture just because it is relevant today? If not, what are the criteria that decides what's in and what's not? Or should religion not evolve with how we perceive humanity at all?
Reply
0
#109 to #107 - tarabostes (06/19/2015) [-]
>Fable


























Religion is an important thing in out lives , just like Philosophy and Science , i don't understand why people think removing it would somehow make us more advanced or somethin' . I don't really know **** about Confucius except from Crank lol , but hey , some people do it by the book , some people like newer stuff.
Reply
+1
User avatar #116 to #109 - yunoknow (06/20/2015) [-]
I am not saying religion serves absolutely no purpose. But in my opinion religion should be keeping up with the times. New saints and new popes are chosen every few years to further Christianity, then why isn't the Bible being updated? Plus a lot of the Western world has long since embraced secularism, but only refer back to the Bible when they're trying to stop changes they don't like. Religions should be for the good of mankind, not another obstacle.
Reply
0
#118 to #116 - tarabostes (06/20/2015) [-]
It ain't an obstacle ***** , and it kinda depends on what religion you have if you're talkin' 'bout the books yuno , for example mormons are from the 1800s right?
Reply
0
User avatar #119 to #118 - yunoknow (06/20/2015) [-]
They shouldn't be. But the sad truth is that in today's context they are. I have no knowledge about the Mormon faith, but I'm talking about the monotheistic sects with teachings today centered only around singular books. They CAN be improving morality, and they still are spiritual guideposts for many people, but it is also used to sow close-mindedness. Again, I am not saying religion should be abolished, just because we find one bad apple, it doesn't mean we give up on the tree. If criticism against these faiths can cherry pick the scriptures that only harm the faiths' image, then the faiths themselves should also select what's relevant and what's not anymore. Don't just always go back to the argument of 'the bible says so'.
Reply
+1
#120 to #119 - tarabostes (06/20/2015) [-]
Well duh , 'mericans sayin' things like "homosexuality is a sin" or "evolution isn't real" , ********* like that is preposturous man . Mormons are monotheistic lol , but anyways , i don't know much besides the south park episode . Yuno you are a very good person and i hope your gains are doubled and that whatever faith/lack of faith you have stays strong!
Reply
+1
User avatar #121 to #120 - yunoknow (06/20/2015) [-]
Haha, I don't even know why I try so hard on this site too. Good talk!
Reply
-1
User avatar #44 to #36 - popeflatus (06/19/2015) [-]
I thought you didn't like Christianity and the Bible.
Reply
+4
#47 to #44 - tarabostes (06/19/2015) [-]
Why would i man?
i may have posted a few dank memes on the pope , but that's playin' mane, i don't see why you would dislike it ....
I'm not Catholic , but Corrupt priests exist in every religion , you mustn't try to look at the pope's actions and try to look at him like a model , for he is only human , with sins and everything. Some people just weren't meant for Priesthood (i think that's what it's called) . However , there have been many saints out there , that helped people , and tried to teach benevolence and faith to other people . Even if there wasn't a God , that should not stop you from living by a certain set of rules that you think are right. Marthin Luther , for example , believed in God , but didn't think there had to be a priest between man and God , that man can have a connection with God without him . And wrote his 95 theses , he was against the pope's corruption at that time , and that he took money , so that everyone who paid him had their sins erased. My point is that with/without religion , doesn't really matter if you live life good and don't let foolishness and other negative things get to you ( i.e. suicide bombing , how retarded do you have to be ?)
Reply
+1
#49 to #47 - popeflatus (06/19/2015) [-]
Interesting that you used the Dalai Lama here. He's actually a corrupt religious leader that used to rule from his 1000 room palace before China exiled him. His society had a rich, ruling priestly class and a large poor lower class that were uneducated and dirt poor. He's a scammer like the rest of them but he's exonerated as a great spiritual teacher by spitting out a few simple platitudes and dressing like he's special.

As I've said before, there is no reason to believe in any god at all as there simply is no evidence in support of one. Anyone can claim to be a religious leader, preacher, reverend etc, and they'll draw thousands, if not millions of followers and get them to blindly follow and empty their wallets.
Reply
0
#50 to #49 - tarabostes (06/19/2015) [-]
But the Llama has a good quote , it doesn't make the quote false or anything , b-baka! ***** what did i say in my last post!?!?
AND AS LONG AS THERE'S NO SOLID EVIDENCE THAT THERE ISN'T , YOU'LL SHUT YOUR MOUTH!!! DO I HAVE TO BRING OUT THE HOSE??

Reply
+2
User avatar #51 to #50 - popeflatus (06/19/2015) [-]
You're shifting the burden of proof with your last sentence. If someone claims there is a god then they have to demonstrate that. This is the same for any claim like if I said I know Superman then I have to prove it. It is not true just because you cannot disprove it.

You make a claim, you bring the proof.

Logic. B-baka.
Reply
0
#52 to #51 - tarabostes (06/19/2015) [-]
PROOOVEEE IIIIITTTT!!!
AND SOMEONE WHO CLAIMS THERE ISN'T A GOD HAS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT. SPERMAN HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE THE 40s , 50s . The Bible was not written in one specific year or in a single location. ... or so other contributors to the Old Testament span a thousand years! ince the Bible was written by around 40 different authors over a period of around 1,500 years, the question “How old is the Bible?” cannot be answered with a single number. The first book of the Bible to be written, likely Genesis or Job, was completed in around 1400 BC. The last book of the Bible to be written, likely Revelation, was completed around AD 90. So, if you go by when the Bible was first started to be written, the Bible is over 3,400 years old. But, if you go by when the Bible was completed, the Bible is over 1,900 years old

Read more: www.gotquestions.org/how-old-is-the-Bible.html#ixzz3dViwLexR <3
Do you really need a bloody hand to descend from the sky and say "I'M REAL PEOPLE " ? No, you might tho !

Also , You make a claim , you bring the proof too!
Faith MUDA MUDA MUDA
Reply
+1
User avatar #53 to #52 - popeflatus (06/19/2015) [-]
the Evolution of Genesis Maybe I should've been more clear. Saying that a god exists is a positive truth claim. I can say there are no mermaids because we understand that there is not only no evidence at all for mermaids but there are no reasons to think that they exist either.

Saying god exists is just like me saying mermaids exists. You can't disprove the existence of mermaids so by your logic there is a reasonable likely hood that they exist.

The video three is worth watching in its entirety so you can see how the bible actually came about. It's book of Genesis was taken largely from Mesopotamian religions the existed 1000 before the first Israelities.
Reply
-1
#60 to #53 - tarabostes (06/19/2015) [-]
Whoa hold up , are you sayin' mermaids don't exist and that you ACTUALLY can't disprove 'em? U SRS?
OFCOURSE THEY EXIST! BOO!
But for real , if you actually wanted to disprove that a species of half-fish , half-human exists , you actually could , we just don't have equipment powerful enough to explore some parts of our oceans!
Also , what if it's positive? I like to stay positive m8 , if you wanna make it negative prove it !
And i don't know exactly the regions from where the first parts of the Bible were taken , but Gandalf's lesson looks like he wants to make a diss brotha. If some parts look wrong , some words might have been taken wrong , but this guy's using such big words mane , I understand you wanna prove it's wrong and stuff. But so far i've seen him list other religions and how long they've been around. But anyways , if you actually think everything began 6000 years ago you're retarded or that evolution never happened, some points are stupid , like do you seriously think people had the tools to know how to find out how old the Earth is? Negro please , he was probably thaught weird ass **** by strict catholic parents and now wants to talk back mane , sorry if I look like i don't want to accept your "MOST LOGICAL AND RATIONAL POINTS OF SUPERIORITY" , but I just don't understand why you want to make people not believe in God so hard mr flatus , like chill brother, it's just game , why do you heff to be mad?
Reply
+8
User avatar #22 to #14 - YllekNayr ONLINE (06/19/2015) [-]
inb4 someone calls this "edgy"
Reply
-2
#23 - tsoper (06/19/2015) [-]
**tsoper used "*roll picture*"**
**tsoper rolled image**

How long will it take until people stop believing in religion?
Reply
0
User avatar #25 to #23 - joshualegitsky (06/19/2015) [-]
Well to religious people never. That's because there's a lot of people who will start believing at rapture. 7 years to decide, but its gonna be very hard in a world without God. I'd give it at least a second thought
Reply
0
User avatar #39 to #25 - tsoper (06/19/2015) [-]
What do you mean hard in a world without God?

There are several people that dont believe in God and they still have the spirit to keep living.

In my personal opinion, atheists are a lot more stable and concrete than religious people. While god is the only thing that keeps religious people together at times of need, atheists rely on progress and reality. Our morals are self-made and we rule how we want
Reply
0
User avatar #115 to #39 - joshualegitsky (06/20/2015) [-]
When the rapture happens there will be 7 years without God and those who followed God. Atheists wont be sent to hell, but its going to feel like it. Anybody who chooses to be christian will be hunted by evil. After the 7 years God will come back to bring up followers again. When you talk about atheists being more steadfast it wouldn't really apply to a spiritual way like this. And I dont think you would be more steadfast then me anyways. Yeah I pray when I'm in trouble but those prayers work. I believe in the power of prayer.
Reply
0
User avatar #46 to #25 - popeflatus (06/19/2015) [-]
Josh, please. There is no evidence that the world is coming to a 'rapture' whatsoever. There isn't even any evidence for your god either.
Reply
0
User avatar #112 to #46 - joshualegitsky (06/20/2015) [-]
There is birth pains but yes you coup say that every generation has said that. So I live like there isn't. Christianity is based on faith without evidence. So no there's no evidence. I believe because I choose to and you choose not to. I didn't say there was a rapture to scare people I said it so people would have an understanding that in my religion it will happen. You can do whatever you want with that.
Reply
0
User avatar #113 to #112 - popeflatus (06/20/2015) [-]
I 'choose' not to believe in your god because there is no evidence. There is no reason to believe in anything without evidence and so believing in the rapture is quite silly. As we've discussed before, many parts of the Bible have been shown to be completely false and so it's just like believing that the stories of Hercules are true.
Reply
0
User avatar #114 to #113 - joshualegitsky (06/20/2015) [-]
There's no evidence there is no God. So look at it this way. You'll live your life without religion. Whatever you do here wont be cause to what's at your end. You'll live and due happily. I'll live my life through rules and faith which is tied to my end. And I believe yours is tied to your end. So I can tell you that I believe you should give this bible a second look. You can tell me to stop telling you, bug its weird to hound me to stop believing. You wont get evidence so please stop talking about it in future decisions. Faith is based on following with no evidence.
Reply
0
User avatar #117 to #114 - popeflatus (06/20/2015) [-]
As I've said to you several times before, if you make a claim, you need to bring the proof. There is no evidence of mermaids but we don't think them to be real.

If your claim has no evidence to support it, that claim gets dismissed.

I've shown you already that there is no reason for me to give the Bible a 'second look' as that book has already shown to be mythology and is not in any sense real at all.

Beleif with out evidence is about as unreasonable as one can be.
Reply
0
User avatar #123 to #117 - joshualegitsky (06/20/2015) [-]
I really dont think you get the concept of faith or religion at that. I dont need physical evidence neither do the people who convert everyday. If you keep looking for evidence you'll miss what faith is about.
Reply
0
#41 to #25 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
A world without religion is a world without a belif that the human race is meaningful. If it is true that there was no meaning in our creation then any belief we hold is opinion including what is good and bad so no matter what you do dont feel bad even if you murder a entire village and raped every single one of them even the men and children and eldery just because you wanted to.
Reply
0
#29 to #23 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**
Never.
Reply
-1
#33 to #23 - hotpiss (06/19/2015) [-]
**hotpiss used "*roll 1, 0-99*"**
**hotpiss rolls 81** dubs and it's 4 years
Reply
0
#98 to #23 - theblackhorntail (06/19/2015) [-]
Probably, never. You see, God represents a hope for humanity. When you have no friends or loved ones, you turn to God. I think humanity created God as an answer to their unanswerable questions, e.g. Thor\Zeus to explain lightning, Poseidon\Ægir to explain tides, and so forth. As long as there are questions unanswered, humanity will always create a God to answer them. God is the most elaborate imaginary friend humanity has created. Now, I'm not saying God is a bad thing. Many folks I've seen have their life turned around for the better because of the hope God gave them, It's just anything taken to extremism is bad; and yes, that also includes atheism.
Reply
+2
User avatar #91 to #23 - oniseiji (06/19/2015) [-]
What's wrong with believing in a God?
Reply
+1
User avatar #99 - lietuvisss (06/19/2015) [-]
People should know that you can't take the religous scripts literally, Bible is good read but just please do not take it seriously there is no God up there waytting for you.
Reply
+1
User avatar #84 - gallusnasus (06/19/2015) [-]
All the stigma against monotheistic religions ignores that their core principles are love and tolerance. People who run around in the street waving "god hates fags" banners aren't doing what god told them to, and neither are the suicide bombers. Well, maybe the suicide bombers, I don't really know enough about Islam, but if that's what their scripture says then that's definitely not the same god as the Judeo-Christian god.
Reply
+1
#72 - mathmanchris (06/19/2015) [-]
Comments be like...
Comments be like...
Reply
+1
User avatar #57 - picamix (06/19/2015) [-]
if god asked me to do something stupid then im not gonna do it, thats the reason for independent thought which was suppose to be a gift god gave us, so if he is now trying to take it away and make me kill people then thats not a god i want to follow.
Reply
0
User avatar #83 to #57 - trollzoll ONLINE (06/19/2015) [-]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the tree of knowledge give humans free will according to the bible?
Reply
-1
User avatar #85 to #83 - gallusnasus (06/19/2015) [-]
literally everything that gives us anything was made by god, so really credit goes to god for everything. Doctors get offended when we say "thank god" because they want the credit, but if they also believed in god, they'd be thanking him for allowing the world to progress to a place where they can be a doctor and save lives. A huge piece of the doctrine is to glorify god for the things you do, because you do them in his name.
Reply
0
User avatar #101 to #85 - trollzoll ONLINE (06/19/2015) [-]
But didn't the snake fool Eve to eat from the tree of knowledge thus giving them free will. I thought god didn't want people them to do it.
Reply
0
User avatar #110 to #101 - gallusnasus (06/19/2015) [-]
It's the tree of knowledge of good and evil, not the tree of free will. We had free will to begin with, but to begin with we only understood doing things which are benevolent, because we were "made in god's image." That doesn't mean god looks like us physically, it means that we were born with pure and good spirits that would do no harm. Eating the fruit changed that and gave us the ability to make bad decisions. The snake didn't trick us into being free, that would be stupid. The snake took advantage of our freedom and tricked us into a way of being where we make ****** decisions. God allowed all of this to happen because he knew the outcome would be that we'd fall from grace, live for thousands upon thousands of years making mistakes, and eventually understand what defines a "mistake" and stop making them, thus returning to grace and living in a way where we once again only make benevolent decisions, but THIS time because we actually know better.

Seriously, if you've never read the scripture and actually paid attention to the message in the metaphor, you're going to have a very hard time understanding the individual pieces of the story, because you don't have the context.
Reply
+1
User avatar #111 to #110 - trollzoll ONLINE (06/19/2015) [-]
Alright. Thanks for the explanation.
Reply
-1
#27 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
Or just stop believing in God and be rad like me. Now quick comment with a fedora so you can get green thumbs. I don't expect an actual ******* argument from you animals, this is FunnyJunk after all. It may as well be called "ignore basic facts about life...junk"
Reply
-2
#38 to #27 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
You have no religion so you have no speacial belief in life. So you belief that life is meaningless. That is just sad.
Reply
-1
#88 to #38 - mvtjets (06/19/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
Reply
+1
#31 to #27 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
I don't understand what's so bad about BELIEVING in something. After all, we wouldn't be anywhere without belief.
Reply
-1
#32 to #31 - hotpiss (06/19/2015) [-]
I believe that if i don't kill all of you ***** the world is doomed

get it now?
Reply
+1
#54 to #32 - ibaitexplain (06/19/2015) [-]
Well that's not very nice.
Reply
-1
#55 to #54 - hotpiss (06/19/2015) [-]
Thought I heard something...

Nope, must have been a fart.
Reply
+1
#56 to #55 - ibaitexplain (06/19/2015) [-]
It was hotpiss.
Reply
0
User avatar #63 to #32 - altari ONLINE (06/19/2015) [-]
How the hell does believing in a god make you doom the world?
Reply
-1
#65 to #63 - hotpiss (06/19/2015) [-]
the **** are you talking about bro? I didn't say anything about a god
Reply
0
User avatar #66 to #65 - altari ONLINE (06/19/2015) [-]
I thought you implied that after what the anon said.
Reply
-1
#67 to #66 - hotpiss (06/19/2015) [-]
the anon i replied to didn't say anything about a god either
Reply
0
User avatar #68 to #67 - altari ONLINE (06/19/2015) [-]
He asked whats so bad about believing in something. I assumed he meant a god of some sort.
Reply
-1
#69 to #68 - hotpiss (06/19/2015) [-]
yep, you assumed.

that's the problem.
Reply
0
User avatar #70 to #69 - altari ONLINE (06/19/2015) [-]
The first anon said to stop believing in god and be cool like him. The second anon asked whats so bad about believing. I don't see what else he could have meant.
Reply
0
#125 to #70 - hotpiss (06/22/2015) [-]
not quite.

second anon said ".... believing in something", now do you see? Said nothing about a god, no matter how many assumptions you make.
Reply
0
#16 - kannonball (06/19/2015) [-]
*roll picture ALLAH HU ACKBAR!
Reply
+1
#17 to #16 - kannonball (06/19/2015) [-]
**kannonball used "*roll picture*"**
**kannonball rolled image** ******* ELL!
Reply
0
#15 - amuzen (06/19/2015) [-]
sounds like an abusive relationship.
Reply
0
User avatar #45 - askafj (06/19/2015) [-]
sure but i wont chose god
Reply
-3
User avatar #64 - xtremehivoltage (06/19/2015) [-]
That is exactly the logic behind suicide bombing in Islam
no other religion
I wonder if that dude got a neck injury tipping his fedora so hard
Reply
0
#106 - anon (06/19/2015) [-]
Isnt: "Why" short for: "for what reason"?
Reply
0
#94 - xchewsifferx (06/19/2015) [-]
I just woke up, and had to re-read the post 3 times, because i continually read it as COD instead of GOD
Reply
0
User avatar #96 to #94 - lulzforalpsplane (06/19/2015) [-]
...god for you...?
12>
[ 124 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)