What?

+264

#11 - borderlineparanoid (01/05/2016) [-]

"missing the point of lesbianism"

is being a lesbian meant to make a point?

what?

-14

#64 to #11 - wellimnotsure (01/06/2016) [-]

It's been pretty much scientifically proven lesbians choose their sexuality while gay men have chemical imbalances in their brain, so yeah it is kinda.

Reply

+27

#66 to #64 - gcloud ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

citation needed

Reply

+7

#65 to #64 - kamusioso (01/06/2016) [-]

Do you have a link to the article? Kinda want to give it a read to that

Reply

0

#80 to #64 - krobeles ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

So you're saying women can be tricked into being gay? And they can be tricked out of it?
Pardon me. I'm off to dress really effeminately. You can find me at the local lesbian bar later, trying to pick up lesbian chicks, tricking them into becomming straight.
Master plan is go, folks!

Seriously though, I think you're full of **** . Most women are just more open to experimentation, and as a result, identify more casually as "lesbian" or "bisexual" than a dude is likely to do. When they stop experimenting, they go back to calling themselves "straight".

Reply

0

#83 to #80 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]

If they are open to experimentation they are and always will be; Bisexual. As in attracted to two genders. Picking a man in the future will not disregard the biological makeup that made you choose a woman in the past.

Reply

0

#88 to #83 - krobeles ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

It needn't be a biological factor, is my point. If I decided to invite a dude over for sex, and we ****** , but I then decided that it didn't really get off as much as I had hoped, that wouldn't make me bisexual. That would just make me a dude who experimentet with gay stuff, and found that it wasn't for him.

Reply

-7

#68 to #64 - ionclawz (01/06/2016) [-]

No, it's that women's sexuality can be influenced by many more factors than men's sexuality. It isn't really a choice.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/14/lesbianism-genetics-gay-women-sexuality_n_1597148.html

Reply

+13

#72 to #68 - ineedtotakeapiss (01/06/2016) [-]

I hope you realise that that article has 0 citations for it's many claims (citation circles don't count), in fact, a lot of Huffington Post articles are lacking in citations, which damages it's overall credibility.

Reply

0

#96 to #72 - ionclawz (01/07/2016) [-]

Studies discussed by article:

Identical twin sisters and sexuality (paragraph 2)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3131304/

Androgen exposure/gender non-conformity (paragraph 3)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778233/

Childhood gender nonconformity/adult homosexuality (paragraph 3)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22458332

"Erotic Plasticity" in Women (paragraph 4)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25193132

Reply

0

#95 to #72 - anon (01/07/2016) [-]

Studies discussed by article:

Identical twin sisters and sexuality (paragraph 2)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3131304/

Androgen exposure/gender non-conformity (paragraph 3)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2778233/

Childhood gender nonconformity/adult homosexuality (paragraph 3)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22458332

"Erotic Plasticity" in Women (paragraph 4)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25193132

Reply

0

#85 to #64 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]

username xd

Reply

+53

#13 to #11 - ohhh ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]

Yeah, it means you don't like points.

Reply

-5

#14 to #13 - erifel (01/05/2016) [-]

I ******* hate Ricky Gervais and the whole ass-douchery idea of that show where they just ridicule mindlessly whatever the third guy says...

Reply

+5

#15 to #14 - ohhh ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]

Although you can't deny he says some dumb **** sometimes. Like the time he thought we were going to weigh the earth down by building too much.

Reply

+10

#33 to #15 - tenaciouslee (01/06/2016) [-]

Yeah, but you can't also deny that Ricky Gervais is a bit of a cunt.

Reply

+7

#38 to #33 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]

I think you're underestimating just how clever Pilkington is - he's no fool. There's a hell of a lot of intelligence in humour

Reply

-4

#55 to #14 - therealtjthemedic (01/06/2016) [-]

He is a cunt, but Pilkington is godly levels of stupid for this.
It's amazing, go watch some.

Reply

+74

#22 - desacabose (01/06/2016) [-]

Reply

+96

#19 - cookiedude (01/06/2016) [-]

So apparently, the guy in the video is gay, and the "film makers" are a lesbian couple that asked their gay friend to do this.

I watched the video, and the guy doesn't even get hard. A real gay man.

Reply

-20

#20 to #19 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]

Im not gay. Im a healthy male. The only way he would not get a boner, would be if he had already ejaculated multiple times prior to this, and or, using something to suppress it.

I get boners all the time. Its quite normal. If a man grabbed it, (or any other straight mans dick), it would be stimulated and aroused, even if it did not want it to.

Same with a women. If a girl is a lesbian and enjoys being licked out by women, she can still orgasm from a man licking her the exact same way a women would.

If you compare a virgin lesbian (with no skills) licking an experienced lesbian, vs a man ho has alot of experience in licking women, chances are the lesbian can orgasm faster with the man -> even though she is a lesbian and "not interested in men"

Reply

+60

#32 to #20 - kegget (01/06/2016) [-]

Puberty is a difficult and confusing time.

Reply

+29

#28 to #20 - ronyx (01/06/2016) [-]

****** what the **** are you talking about

Reply

+14

#30 to #20 - QuestionMarks ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

While I agree that men will randomly get boners for no reason (unless health issues) that doesn't mean everyone gets hard because it's touched, for me I don't get hard unless it's a sexual/sensual situation or it's one of those random times. Not all penises act the same

Reply

+2

#54 to #30 - blowbags ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

*nod*

Reply

0

#40 to #30 - sptnfouroneseven ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

Are you saying that a woman touching your dick doesn't get you hard?

Reply

+3

#76 to #40 - fishandkids ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

How could he know?

Reply

+2

#77 to #76 - sptnfouroneseven ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

Fair play.

Reply

+13

#26 to #20 - installation (01/06/2016) [-]

What does not being gay have to do with being healthy?

Reply

+1

#58 to #20 - sedativechunk (01/06/2016) [-]

GIF

That's the dumbest thing I've read in 2016 so far. I'm keeping a list, ****** anon, and you are at the top.

Reply

0

#67 to #20 - sixfivefourtwoone ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

I don't know how your dick works, but if the person touching mine doesn't turn me on, it's gonna be as soft as it could get.

Reply

+1

#51 to #19 - commontroll (01/06/2016) [-]

Why would they pick a guy who wouldn't even get hard? Like, you'd think they'd be like "hey, you know what, most straight women handle a hard one, maybe we should at least have him pop a viagra first." That would just be awkward for everyone I think.

Reply

+57

#25 - mrwalkerfour (01/06/2016) [-]

how to get a large group of girls to touch your dick in quick succession?

say its a social experiment

Reply

-2

#41 to #25 - vladhellsing ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

Or a pinata.

Reply

+316

#3 - cheastnut (01/05/2016) [-]

so are they going to have "virgins touch vagina for the first time" sequel?

Reply

+13

#21 to #3 - huszti (01/06/2016) [-]

RAPE

Reply

+14

#7 to #3 - putincanmeltcrimea (01/05/2016) [-]

they would but sadly admin could not be bothered

Reply

+36

#4 to #3 - platinumaltaria (01/05/2016) [-]

No because that would obviously be sexist to imply women have vajingles.

Reply

+11

#47 to #4 - echsa (01/06/2016) [-]

vajingles

Reply

0

#71 to #47 - tarabostes (01/06/2016) [-]

vagangias

Reply

+1

#69 to #4 - masterboll (01/06/2016) [-]

vajonyas*

Reply

-1

#70 to #4 - tarabostes (01/06/2016) [-]

no u

Reply

+13

#8 to #3 - benadryl (01/05/2016) [-]

**benadryl rolled user NinjaKnight ** yes, and here is one of the participants

Reply

+13

#50 to #3 - lmOldGreg ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

Yes. You should get your application in early

Reply

+14

#44 to #3 - preshmilk ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

Yeah, you guest star in it.

Reply

+16

#17 to #3 - darkseidrules (01/05/2016) [-]

They have "gay men touch boobs for the first time" as a sequel.

Reply

+19

#24 to #3 - captainprincess ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

they did have one where gays touch tits
but she was wearing a shirt the whole time and there are even a ton of comments on it like

"the **** is this hows this fair"

Reply

+187

#6 - psychotayto (01/05/2016) [-]

A lot of lesbians will tell you that they find penises to be "gross" but from my experience a lot of them wish they had one to use on girls.

Reply

+34

#23 to #6 - turbanmasher (01/06/2016) [-]

Isn't that the whole point of strap-ons and other phallic shaped objects?

Reply

+26

#27 to #23 - shadowstepone ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

yes, that's why they use them

Reply

+25

#5 - crixuz (01/05/2016) [-]

"I have no regrets"

Reply

+77

#9 - slendercam (01/05/2016) [-]

So do they have a "Gay Men Touch Vagina for the First Time"? or would that be considered sexually objectifying women?

Reply

-18

#34 to #9 - donatelo (01/06/2016) [-]

and here we have the equivalent of a femenazi with a un-descended testicles.

Reply

+23

#42 to #34 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]

Reply

-8

#43 to #42 - donatelo (01/06/2016) [-]

the fact that someone not only has this saved on their computer but remains anon...lel.

Reply

0

#82 to #9 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]

they had gay men touch boobs for the first time

Reply

0

#10 to #9 - anonmuncher (01/05/2016) [-]

There was a gay men touching boobs for the first time video instead.

Reply

+40

#12 to #10 - goodhomer ONLINE (01/05/2016) [-]

I don't see how that is equivalent.

Reply

+1

#48 to #10 - srgfernandez (01/06/2016) [-]

I don't wanna touch a boob, hell, anyone can have boobs like fat men.

I wanna know what it's like to touch a vagina if those lesbians can touch a dick of a very attractive man.
needless to say I'm damn jealous of them

Reply

+2

#78 to #48 - melwach (01/06/2016) [-]

Fat mans boobs feel different. Except if you have a very fat woman, then it's kinda similar. But slightly firm boobs..aw yeah. That's where it's at.

Reply

+17

#53 - TheHutchie (01/06/2016) [-]

Does this author think that lesbians are supposed to be enemies of the penis?

I think it's more comparable to my relationship with broccoli. I mean, I know it exists and it's out there, but I'm not really interested. Touching one for some study wouldn't turn me into a ******* vegetarian.

Reply

+7

#2 - valverde (01/05/2016) [-]

His face tho

Reply

+6

#31 - zaggystirdust (01/06/2016) [-]

You ever be so progressive you end up being homophobic?

Reply

0

#73 to #31 - tarabostes (01/06/2016) [-]

GIF

YES
NOW ******* DIEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

+4

#59 - mrhazzy ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

I deleted my previous comment because it was ***** .

I've seen the video, it's interesting, the guy is gay and the women are lesbians, they have another video where the gay guys touch boobs.

The author needs to realise that just because you've touched a penis, doesn't make you not a lesbian anymore...

I'm straight, and about the penises I've touched 1 - my own I've liked 100% of them... don't make me gay though...

That was a terrible joke I'm sorry

Reply

0

#61 to #59 - faithrider ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

well it wasn't just terrible because it is, its also terrible because you stole it

Reply

0

#63 to #59 - remilia (01/06/2016) [-]

**remilia used "*roll picture*"**
**remilia rolled image**
It's hard to make a penis joke. Especially when it's about my penis. :^)

Reply

0

#79 to #59 - krobeles ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

Well, how do you know you're straight if you haven't had hot steaming gay sekz, eh? Cant reasonably say you dislike a certain kind of food untill you've tried it, now can you?
I think you need to go play with some cocks, before you can call yourself a straight bloke!

Reply

0

#89 to #79 - mrhazzy ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

I know I'm straight though, I'm not attracted to other men, and I don't need to touch another man's penis to prove that to myself, I've kissed a few guys, does nothing for me, that's about it.

Reply

0

#90 to #89 - krobeles ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

Hah! You kissed dudes! ******* faggot.

Reply

0

#91 to #90 - mrhazzy ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

That's a point I'm trying to make, I've kissed a guy or two, doesn't make me gay, she's touched a penis a gay man's penis but that doesn't make her straight...

I'm not attracted to men, I'm attracted to women, I know I'm straight, because men do nothing for me.

Reply

0

#92 to #91 - krobeles ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

Woah there, sport. Getting awefully defensive now, eh?
Someone has doubts about his own heterosexuality, mayhaps?
Might wanna touch a few cocks, just to be totally sure, I think.

Reply

0

#94 to #92 - mrhazzy ONLINE (01/06/2016) [-]

I see what you're trying to do, I'm just merely remaking my point, say what you will.

Reply

+10

#1 - rayeightk (01/05/2016) [-]

Reply

+1

#60 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]

Reply

-1

#39 - buffalogriller (01/06/2016) [-]

So apparently the author is pissed off that lesbians are portrayed in relation to penis, instead of as an independent group.
The point of being Lesbian is a complete disregard for dick, and this is, to the author, a rule that must not be broken.

Reply

0

#84 to #39 - theugandanhero (01/06/2016) [-]

There's not a "complete disregard for dicks" so long as dildos get used.

Reply

+1

#86 to #84 - buffalogriller (01/06/2016) [-]

I guess I should have put "to the author" at the beginning of that sentence.

Reply

0

#87 to #86 - theugandanhero (01/06/2016) [-]

If it can help others on here understand what you're trying to say then yeah it would probably be a good idea

Reply

+1

#37 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]

She is gay because of the water, just look at this frog!

Reply

+1

#36 - Nahyon (01/06/2016) [-]

>she has to make full eye contact
>guy stands fully naked infront of her
There most be more

Reply

0

#49 to #36 - praemium (01/06/2016) [-]

must*

Reply

0

#46 - concetrationcamp (01/06/2016) [-]

**concetrationcamp used "*roll picture*"**
**concetrationcamp rolled image** I call ******** on this one...it looks like a porn intro to me.

Reply

-3

#18 - zeldamasterace (01/06/2016) [-]

ok. i'm calling bull on this one. and im basing that only on the amount of porn that i've watched.

i've seen alot of porn, professional and amateur with lesbians that involved the use of a strapon.

so im assuming that the majority of lesbians that use strapons are not disgusted by the idea of a penis.

if i'm wrong, im wrong and i'll admit it. but last time i checked, sexuality was based on who you wanted to have sex with, not on your ability to see sexual organs as black and white representations of antiquated ways to push political agendas.

Reply

-1

#35 to #18 - anon (01/06/2016) [-]

just because you have essentially a plastic banana doesn't mean putting your hand on a guy's dick won't make you feel weird

faggot

Reply

-1

#29 - jsrf (01/06/2016) [-]