I thought it was the other way around and oatmeal wanted a bigger bite out of his accusation case of FJ stealing his **** when CHC was defending funnyjunk. Did I misread the entire thing?
i don't remember exactly it myself, but i think oatmeal sent a Cease and Desist, but the lawyer could have deflected it but he decided to push his luck and demanded 20K bucks from the oatmeal over damages.
If i remember correctly after he deflected the cease and desist he wanted the oatmeal to pay for admins lawyer fees, so the oatmeal made a kickstarter to get the money so he could donate it to charity just to spite him. Then the lawyer alone did a lawsuit against the oatmeal for that
Also, why it's a very expensive one. Every 12 year old's going to be going to that website, thus, whoever's running that website is likely rich as balls.
Somewhat true but he makes some thought provoking and funny comics as well. Both sides handled the case bad but imo old addy and lawyer handled it even worse than oatmeal.
Charles Faggion decided to sue him for slander and instead of dropping the case pressed for 20k, which oatmeal raised, but instead of giving it, he gave it to a cancer charity and a wildlife charity and sent a picture to Charles depicting a very fat version of charle's mother seducing a bear.
**sleepehz used "*roll picture*"** **sleepehz rolled image**Apparently this guy is the one who insisted admin to sue over some statements the oatmeal featured on his website.
the letter sent to Mr. Inman of the Oatmeal by way of Mr. Carreon s3.amazonaws.com/theoatmeal-img/blog/funnyjunk_let
All of that ended with the oatmeal getting a bunch O money, which he used for a lulz worthy middle finger i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--mJQ_Hz_E--/17se0v8iqng3vjpg.jpg
I would assume this case was where a majority of Addy's money woes came from. I was amazed the site didnt shut down after that.
I feel bad about my AdBlocker now... probably wont disable it, but I do feel bad about it kinda.
**brozetop used "*roll picture*"** **brozetop rolled image** i came to funnyjunk because of this case. so i dont know how to feel about him. I'm stuck here, but i'm not complaining
>Funnyjunk is a content aggregator
>Oatmeal content gets posted regularly
>Oatmeal creator makes an angry blog post about the way FJ operates Something about how the ads ensure that FJ is making money off of his content.
>Addy gets the lawyer involved
>They try to sue him for "defamation and slander."
Believe it or not, people get annoyed when other, lazier, less creative people profit off of their work and intellectual property while the creator receives nothing.
Its not like I said he didnt have a right to complain. If anything, the people here that think FJ was in some righteous light or something make me ******* cringe.