idk about you guys but i would schlong that women all night, those lips, those cheacks and that jaw line like dam, 9/10 would bang definatley

9/11 would bang.

5/7

damn straight son. muslims, asians, latinas, that ****** fire

Except she's telling him "you don't wanna respect me? Okay, no airtime for you. Go become a nobody again."

And you know how FJ is.

Some things are gold and get -1 thumb. Some things were made purely to dick around and suddenly everybody has an opinion and green thumbs at the ready.

If she's the HOST, however, she won't get in trouble.

And this is an interview, not a guy yelling insults about women from atop a rooftower. The news doesn't need to report on the guy's attitude towards women, nobody cares.

And most first world news agencies would side with her on not allowing him to be an ass to her, without resorting to calling him such. But I can see your point too as being possible.

Except just one tiny detail. Guy got his enourmous ego crashed when she basically said the equivalent of tits or gtfo.
Tits=manners, gtfo=conversation is over.

Ayy bby, show me your 'manners' or 'conversation is over'

Please let this become a thing

Except by saying what she does; how she does, she is proving she has no respect left for him either.

All it is, is her basically saying " **** You." In a more "acceptable" words.

By the end they do have mutual respect for each other, even if that mutual level is 0.

Respect, just like disrespect, is earned. What you should begin with is common decency.


Did this man not earn disrespect?

my god..... CONGRATULATIONS sir!!! you have won the "dumbest comment of the year" award! would you like to say a few words to friends and family?

That's not quite it. She's not saying, " **** you", she's saying, shes giving him an ultimatum, "either give me the respect I deserve or **** you". If she had no respect for him, she wouldn't have given him a chance to continue the conversation.

In my mind at least; People don't change because you ask, nor suddenly respect you if you ask. Especiially when it comes to religious beliefs (which is where i assume his opinion comes from

so the first of the 2 option is literally just words that are said to be said, only used as a defense or to gain sympathy.

Which leaves only the 2nd as the real meaning.

You can tell she is visibly upset (understandable), and also has that, "I'm done with this." look. Which leads me to believe that she wouldn't really be interested in the conversation even in the event of spontaneous respect.

At least, that is how I see it.

(Not Going to Happen) or X
is the same as X so i take that as the intended meaning.

that man's own opinions may not change on the spot, but if he still goes through the act of choosing to be respectfull and choosing to /show/ respect during the interview, that still counts for something.

Just because it's improbable that he would show her respect, and maybe even apologize, doesn't mean it's impossible. She may have had an annoyed look on her face, but that's only because she was annoyed. If she really wanted to end it, she would have, likely by saying, "well thank you for your time, bye bye".

Except that if she said that, she would just stay angry, being a normal person she would want to vent. By saying what she did, she is also venting, because it also carries the meaning of, "As you are, you aren't worthy of MY time."

All i see here is a normal woman, lashing back after an insult.

Are you literally retarded? Do you have Down Syndrome or something?

Just because you are incapable of understanding someone's thought processes does not make them retarded.

Let me see if I can understand your thought process. "I'll just repeat the same point over and over again in different ways, rather than responding to or even acknowledging the arguments brought against it." Sound about right?

you're not in much of a position to talk there my friend, considering you added nothing to our conversation about subjectiveness, and reading through this, any rational thinking human could easily deduce that he was right, and that you were wrong, but hey, I guess understanding basic concepts isn't for everyone.

Aside from the people purely hopping on to bash my comments with generic criticism or commentaries in order to get thumbs.

I did respond to the guy who actually seemed to want to actually have a discussion. I held a conversation and expressed my thoughts. The only thing that i can see that I didnt Acknowledge is The fact that yes, there is a very tiny possibility something bizarre can happen and he might "gain respect" towards her. But as I said, I View it as a tiny tiny near impossible chance.

In fact I view this "conversation" with you as most likely nothing more than an attempt to gain thumbs and a response from me to get new posts, seeing as you have done nothing but insult me and made generic comments.

Anyone else want to jump on the bandwagon for some free thumbs?

Unless You actually have something constructive to add, I wont be responding.

Yeah, sure, let me hop on this train.

You said 'in my mind at least,' which speaks only to yourself, and not what actually might happen. You're precluding reality from happening by stating that your perception takes precedence.

So the first of the two options actually is a fairly valid thing, despite what you think. People who assert that they are to be respected as equals generally get that respect, deserved or not. Asides, though, speaking an ultimatum isn't asking.

The second argument, that her face held a look of 'I'm done with this,' which led you to believe that she wouldn't really be interested in the conversation in the event of mutual respect, is... what? She showed, clearly, that she wasn't kidding about her stance. At that point, she was done with the conversation, unless he complied and stopped ******** about.

Your initial argument that she was kindly saying ' **** you' isn't valid either. It was one of the two options she presented, but like ohemgeezus >>#33 was saying, it was a choice. Which is... what an ultimatum is.

Not understanding that point is why alarubra got thumbs for >>#65. It seems that people do actually understand your thought process, but see it as flawed.

Anyway, that's my two cents. Read or disregard; I had fun, either way.