Upload
Login or register
x

War: Korean War.

 
War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered Korea to both the Soviet Union and the US after WWII both countries set up a government in the Koreas as they were, so USSR set up a communist nation while the US set up South Korea as a capitalist nation. North Korea, led by admins granddaddy, Kim il Sung was getting a lot of support from the USSR. Tanks, planes, weapons and what not. Both sides wanted to unite but the North wanted to unite as a communist nation, the South as a capitalist state


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

North Korean forces cross border with South Korea. North Korean Peoples Army, NKPA, numbers approximately 135,000 men, Republic of Korea, ROK, Army contains 98,000 soldiers. On June 25, 1950. Stalin told North Korea to invade and that China would send reinforcement. Three days later, the North Koreans take Seoul. UN condemns the attack and call a meeting for the security council. USSR was protesting the fact that Nationalist China and not Communist China was in the security council so they couldn't vote against it


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

South Korea troops were not as prepared as the North Koreans so they were pushed back. Eventually they're pushed to Inchon. UN sent troops led by Gen Douglas MacArthur. Okay now this was after WWII, no one wanted to go to war, but then the US didn't want there to be more Communist nations, because they
had this insane idea called the Domino Effect. What it basically was that if one, hold on, I'm really goddamn drunk, i've been feeling ****** and having a bad day, just give me an hour.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Okay so domino effect, was the belief that If one nation falls to communism, the surrounding nations would do so as well.


(Enlarge)
War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

When the NK, can I say NK for north korea and SK for the other? Yes okay thanks, so the NK army pushed south, and more and more refugees started moving south more as well. NK took Inchon, and kept going south. Now the UN troop arrived while the NK troops had pushed all the way to Pusan, an area southeast of Korea. Now the US troops landed in Pusan where the South Koreans were barely holding their own. US troops fought against an overwhelming amount of NK troops, since the main force had not arrived. Not wanting it to be pushed back to sea, MacArthur ordered an amphibian assault to the Inchon. However, he had planned three different occasions but had to be scrapped as the troops he had prepared needed to be moved to help defend Pusan Perimeter. Now he finally decided to use U.S. Army‍ '​s 7th Infantry Division for the assault. Now MacArthur knew the South Koreans really didn't like the government that the US put in place, and thought if he didn't push the NK troops back, most SK troops would not hold the line. Inchon was dangerous, tricky, and quite a difficult terrain to overcome.


(Enlarge)
War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

F4 Corsair above a naval group.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

F4 Corsair above a naval group.
See MacArthur gave no ***** to what his advisors said and basically went forward knowing he needed a decisive victory. Now the Chinese warned the North Koreans to fortify Inchon because they studied MacArthur's tactics and knew he would attack from Inchon, I don't think they had enough man power, time or supplies but MacArthur's UN troops landed and took the city. In a few days, they were able to Seoul. They had cut off the NK troops and those at the Pusan perimeter were being pushed by UN, and SK troops. Yeah the Aussies helped too. Jesus alright yeah I remember you too Aussies, you and all the commonwealth helped in this war too, mentioned.


(Enlarge)
War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

No this isn't Dresden, on October 19, 1950 Pyongyang falls to UN forces having successfully pushed north of the 38th parallel. The push from Inchon gave UN and SK troops the necessary help to begin pushing back NK troops.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Now, MacArthur had word from that the Chinese would intervene, but when they took the NK capital nothing from the chinese. The UN said that it would leave Korea communist free. So UN and SK troops headed north towards the Yalu River.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Now remember Stalin? Yeah remember earlier I said he gave permission to Kim Il Sung to invade the south and China would send reinforcements? Well secretly the Chinese were massing huge numbers of troops on the opposite side of the Yalu river. Let's just say superior training and firepower don't do jack **** when a massive force rushes you. You can fire and kill hundreds but you're going to run out of ammo eventually or be overwhelmed. And that's what happened, with increased opposition, UN offensive stalls and then collapses. Chinese troops push UN forces back across 38th parallel and capture Southern capital of Seoul.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Chosin reservoir, now fighting was miserable on both sides, especially in this snowy terrain. In this 1950 battle, 15,000 U.S. soldiers and Marines, alongside another 15,000 UN soldiers, fought through a force of 120,000 Chinese soldiers to reach the sea some 78 miles away. They were surrounded by the chinese.


(Enlarge)
War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Now, when MacArthur talked to congress about the involvement of the Chinese, he did request for dropping nuclear bombs against the chinese. This would have caused WWIII and Truman eventually fired him in 1951, 6 months after asking for the bomb to be dropped. This made the public mad.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Thats how much the chinese pushed UN and US troops.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Something interesting to note was the first jet dogfights. After WWII, US and USSR techs got ahold of German scientist and grabbed jet tech and made their own jets.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Operation Thunderbolt, UN troops went on the offensive on January 25, 1951. They pushed north against the chinese.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Okay now, Truman dismissed MacArthur, i know i'm missing a lot of info, sorry, but heres the run down, command was given to Matthew Ridgway. He collected the UN troops and pushed them north of the 38th parallel.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Alright this is the part that gets repetitive because from 1951 to 1953, the war was basically a stalemate.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Chinese troops pushed, get stopped and are pushed back. UN troops push north, are eventually stopped and pushed back to their original positions.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

UN bombers bombing power plants, munition supplies, and troops, however bitter dog fighting in the air destroyed many bombers that the US air force were forced to stop unaccompanied daylight bombing campaigns and resorted to night bombings.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

If this plays right, then it will show how crappy the situation was, both sides dug trenches, tanks were used as mobile artillery, small gains were made and lost.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Here some Aussies because I don't give them enough love.


(Enlarge)
War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Something to note was that a lot of the equipment used in this war was leftovers from WWII, T34s and Shermans were used against each other, battleships and rifles from WWII also used.


War: Korean War.. Alright, this war is a little different because technically, technically, technically, it's still going on. Now after the Japanese surrendered

Eventually both sides agreed to a ceasefire and both sides had been negotiating it since July 1953 to1954. However on July 27, 1953 a Peace Treaty signed at Panmunjom stopped hostilities the 38th parallel reset as boundary between communist North and anti communist South. Then both sides negotiate for return of prisoners and eventually returning the dead.



This might not be my good ones, so if i'm wrong, or missing more than usual, please kindly, kindly tell me and I will most likely redo a second part. I honestly haven't been feeling well but I don't want to put my problems on you. Also this war is still technically still going on, since it was just an armistice, not a formal declaration of peace ending the war, hostilities could still erupt any day because of that.

Also I had trouble uploading this on Thursday 25th, 2015, kept giving me problems, I blame admin not wanting me to tell what happened. This has been revised by his moderators.

+473
Views: 29040
Favorited: 59
Submitted: 09/25/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to chuchiereaper

Comments(111):

chuchiereaper has disabled anonymous comments.
Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 111 comments ]
98 comments displayed.
User avatar #1 - chuchiereaper [OP]ONLINE (09/25/2015) [+] (8 replies)
stickied by chuchiereaper
Mentions:
neeeeee, tomtomvdp, theflyingdick, huntergriff,, creatablejamtheoddorange, italianfrosttroll, stianan, omahooha, comicironic, inzix, nocakeforthetroll, robdabob, vladi, melwach, adfc, donbionicle, raspoetin, zenerefe, theoldfritz, zealotgold, dingdongpancakes, damandan, bloodrocutation, farmerjonny, mrblueftw, tbhkthusgnvkrauo, jarkinmopsin, wafflebrewery, drtennant, aproudpatriot, midgetwithhands, pirateseatcarrots, tbhkthusgnvkrauo, solain, naafi, karson, vpngtn, denisDARussian, potatorgue, tbhkthusgnvkrauo, dibella, kevintothemax, handsomestalin, patriotpenguin, ptolomeus, felixfox, cyrodill, zafyrox, akulakhan, plastmasskurk, stapel, tandemwarelephant, patriotpenguin, fappafappafap, doggyfashion, jettom, shiphotel, letrollzor, rheago, godlessbastard, youhi, jaydudereborn, raeptiemx, xkitty, alfrsa, computor, noobpeller, cooperdewoo, hungwellhamburger, donatelo, untamedlazyeye, robmad, navien, masonhawke, ablakguy, odstnsg, hourlyb, nomadfourohthree, kangster, daentraya, goggins, penetron, asslickingood, lukashein, taskpawner, lordknightmare

Comment if you'd like a mention or to be taken off the list.
User avatar #2 - chuchiereaper [OP]ONLINE (09/25/2015) [+] (7 replies)
stickied by chuchiereaper
#7 - jaydudereborn (09/25/2015) [-]
A ton of respect for mentioning the Australians even though it wasn't a big war for us.
A ton of respect for mentioning the Australians even though it wasn't a big war for us.
User avatar #8 to #7 - jaydudereborn (09/25/2015) [-]
Also, do the Emu War. Everyone loves that one.
#12 to #8 - chuchiereaper [OP]ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
User avatar #32 to #12 - medxforme ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
Whenever hear about the Korean War I think of Grand Torino
User avatar #9 to #8 - donbionicle (09/25/2015) [-]
Truly, they were the darkest times for the Continent Country.
#31 - kompel (09/25/2015) [-]
User avatar #104 to #31 - sphincterface (09/26/2015) [-]
God I loved that show. Still do.
#89 to #31 - xclbr (09/26/2015) [-]
thank you
User avatar #35 - megakillerx (09/25/2015) [-]
So the Korean War was pretty much a real life TF2 match?

minus all the hats of course
User avatar #78 to #35 - willindor ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
That would explain all the rocket jumpers and silly taunts in the conflict
#56 to #35 - burpateer (09/25/2015) [-]
Which part did he say each side had a copious amount of spies and snipers?
#37 - cortzanza (09/25/2015) [-]
I don't want to be a cunt but you're wanking off about the Australians when 87,000 British troops took part in the Korean conflict, and over 1,000 British servicemen lost their lives. I know men who fought in Korea from my home town.

Why no mention of any one of them? You say you don't give Aussies enough love but never once have i ever seen any mention of those 87,000 troops from others who talk about the Korean War.
User avatar #51 to #37 - chuchiereaper [OP]ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
See this is my problem, i mention the british, aussies get pisssed, i mention the aussies, brits get pissed, there were troops from a lot of nations so I just stuck with UN troops. I did occasionally say US, but they were UN troops as well.
#26 - xxDanvelxx (09/25/2015) [-]
My Gramps flew one of these In the Korean war, he became an instructor for jet pilots in Manchuria towards the end of the war. I don't know if he participated in the fighting over MIG alley, but I'd like to think, would make for one badass grandpa. Shame he took the secret with him to his grave.
User avatar #34 - noooooooooo (09/25/2015) [-]
My Grandfather fought in this war, if I remember correctly he mentioned that whenever he went anywhere he brought a South Korean with him because they could easily tell the difference from a north or south Korean.
#74 to #34 - doctoroz (09/25/2015) [-]
I'm not sure why, but this made me laugh.
User avatar #11 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Government shouldn't be able to just fire officers like that. World War III would've likely been the most benign of conflicts had it started then and there...
User avatar #80 to #11 - bigbadpapaboris (09/25/2015) [-]
At that time USSR already had the nuke and still boosted one of the most powerful and advanced armies in the world, if the USA started throwing nukes down in china they would have been extremely pissed since Russia and China had a mutual defence treaty. With europe still in ruin WW3 would have just been a shameless massacre.
User avatar #87 to #80 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Or a skirmish. Depends on what they would've done.

Either way, it's quite shameful they didn't do anything about the Chinese.
User avatar #13 to #11 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
How so?
User avatar #14 to #13 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
The U.S. would've been a step ahead when it came to the mass fabrication of nuclear weapons. They already had the process nailed down. They could've pointed a bomber at Beijing if they didn't pull their troops back.

If not for the UN, the world likely would be a much better place than it is today. Red tape only perpetuates the suffering of others.
#17 to #14 - comicironic (09/25/2015) [-]
What would it have achieved?

More death and suffering?
An excuse for the USSR to push west and swallow the remaining European countries?
User avatar #22 to #17 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Not if Moscow was hit at the exact same time. With both armies leaderless, the world would've been at peace.
#30 to #22 - comicironic (09/25/2015) [-]
You realise Star Wars isn't an accurate representation of how war works, right?
User avatar #39 to #30 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Star Wars is fiction.
User avatar #28 to #22 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
Right, and not a massive *********** of lesser powers grabbing for their master's thrones. And how would blowing up Moscow and Beijing bring about peace? It would make martyrs of millions while war would rage on in Europe and in the East. And how would a B-29 or a B-36 even get within 100 miles of Moscow to begin with?
User avatar #40 to #28 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Well that's only if they linger.
User avatar #42 to #40 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
If who linger?
User avatar #44 to #42 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
The west. Supplant the previous leadership, and they won't have the time to squabble.
User avatar #47 to #44 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
You're losing me here. Are you suggesting replacing the leaders of the communist countries with western leaders? Because we tried something akin to that with Batista, Hussein, and Pinochet, and it didn't end well. If not war, you'd have widespread civil unrest; rioting and protesting. Just because the eastern block countries would be weakened, that doesn't mean they'd just lay down and accept a new dictator in the place of an old one.
User avatar #48 to #47 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Doesn't necessarily have to be a dictator, more of an annexation. I'm sure all the food not going straight into the state would've been enough for them.

Not like it matters now.
User avatar #55 to #48 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
How in the gods' names would annexation be taken any better to by the smaller communist states than installing a dictator? And what does food have to do with it?
User avatar #58 to #55 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Less brutality, for starters. And the fact that your asking what commodities have to do with bringing down Communism is alarming.
User avatar #60 to #58 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
True, but I doubt that- after having been the holding of one great power for so many decades- they would take kindly to being taken possession by another. I asked what food had to do with anything because your mention of food was non sequiter to the argument about annexation.
User avatar #62 to #60 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
>>#61
User avatar #61 to #58 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
*you're

And back on track, Communist societies have no concept of property. Everything belongs to the state. The state has sole authority over the production and allocation of commodities. Shortages and famine were frequent.

Simply by toppling the powers responsible for this through nuclear force and increasing production, the world would've seen a relatively peaceful end to the Communist threat.

But no, they let it drag on and on.

User avatar #63 to #61 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
Yes, shortages were frequent because agriculture was administered horribly and could certainly be rectified with better management, but annexing a half-dozen communist satellite states would absolutely not be the simple and easy task you seem to think it would be.

You keep trying to argue that nuclear war would lead to peace and that it would be a simple affair. It would not. Even if something like Plan Totality were followed, it would be the catalyst to even larger scale conventional warfare after retaliatory nuclear bombings.
User avatar #65 to #63 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Not the satellite states, just Moscow and Beijing. The rest will fall in line, as they would be cut off.

And like I said, the West would've won a nuclear conflict at the time through sheer projection capability.
User avatar #67 to #65 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
Even if they were cut off, many of the the satellite states still had very hard-line communist governments that would aid the Soviet Union if it were under Western threat.

You're suggesting annexing Moscow and Beijing? How the hell would that be a simple prospect? You can't just march into an enemy capitol and demand that they hand it over. The last few times anyone tried that in Moscow, it cost them several hundred thousand lives and the invaders were consistently unsuccessful. Even if you bombed the cities and rebuilt it as a western capitol, and even if the west won on the nuclear front, it's not as though the entirety of the Soviet and Chinese forces were located in one city. They were prepared to fight through a radioactive wasteland in conventional war to reclaim their cities even if they came out on the worse end of a nuclear exchange.
User avatar #71 to #67 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Everything becomes simple when you remove the enemy's leadership.
#79 to #71 - limberlarry (09/25/2015) [-]
Dude, you have absolutely zero appreciation for how things work in the real world
User avatar #95 to #14 - generaljosh (09/26/2015) [-]
Using nukes as McArthur suggested would have normalized the use of nuclear weapons in conventional warfare. I don't see any situation where this could be construed as a net benefit.
User avatar #96 to #95 - scowler (09/26/2015) [-]
Normalization would've depended on volume of deployment. MacArthur was likely advocating their deployment as a tactical weapon at most.

Of course, the really sad part was that they had actually bought into the Chinese being neutral. Shameful...
User avatar #16 to #14 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
That's true, but even after a nuclear attack, the U.S. would still be left with a massive land war not only with China but with the Soviet Union with which to contend. Given the considerably larger American nuclear stockpiles at the time, they could very probably win, but it would still be a massive loss of life on all sides, more than would be politically feasible for any government to endorse, especially so close after the second world war. No one wants to walk across hot coals when their feet are already burnt.

And yes, maybe, but bureaucracy also creates stability, for better or for worse, and stability is almost always appealing to governments and political entities.
User avatar #23 to #16 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
If your feet are already burnt, the nerves no longer feel, thus making the task easier. It's simply a matter of how carefully you tread.

Real Peace is always preferable to it's lesser cousin, Stability.
User avatar #24 to #23 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
The point is who wants a devastating war after another devastating war?

But always less attainable.
User avatar #25 to #24 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Anyone with the resolve to see war on a grand scale become a thing of the past.

Doesn't matter now, the stage is being set as we speak. The Reds are coming.
#45 to #11 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
>Likes every reply.
>Still get red-thumbed.
User avatar #53 to #45 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
Thumbing up someone else's comment places zero obligation on them to do the same for you, nor does it make your argument any more valid.
User avatar #54 to #53 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Exactly. It's simply a means of rewarding contribution.

It's worked in the past, I think...
User avatar #57 to #54 - madvulcan (09/25/2015) [-]
That seems somehow both friendly and condescending.
User avatar #59 to #57 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
The former is intentional. Latter, not so much.
User avatar #36 to #11 - historybuff ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
That's the whole point of civil government leadership over the military, to stop them from doing stupid **** like nuking the Chinese
User avatar #38 to #36 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
But being able to simply eliminate competent officers for making a request is madness.
User avatar #41 to #38 - historybuff ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
Oh ok, you don't understand the situation. MacArthur tried to go around Truman by asking congress for authorization, effectively trying to outrank the commander in chief. What he did was insubordination and, if he had succeeded, would've had a far reaching effect on how the military and the president interact. In essence, the military could've made itself answerable to Congress and not the president, and the way he was asking for it, would've meant congress would have to tell the military to stop, not give it the go ahead
User avatar #43 to #41 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
I completely agree with that approach. One man should have that kind of control over the military. Say, why can't congress veto the president's decision to fire an officer?
User avatar #49 to #43 - historybuff ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
Because the management of the military is the sole responsibility of the Executive branch. It ties into the checks and balances of the Government. In certain situations, the Senate does have to confirm appointments, which means they do have some degree of control.

But let me put it this way. What if, every time your Father told you to go to your room, your Grandmother tried to but in and defend you? The President has to have authority over the military cause thats like his one big thing
User avatar #50 to #49 - scowler (09/25/2015) [-]
Whatever, it doesn't work either way. Not on this scale...
User avatar #29 - theoddorange (09/25/2015) [-]
Suicide is Painless (M.A.S.H Theme) this started playing on my playlist when I was reading this, pretty uncanny. Love reading about the Korean war, it's overshadowed by the Vietnam war so much these days.
#99 - LTB (09/26/2015) [-]
Just to give an idea of the equipment used, pictured is my M1 Carbine. It was produced in 1943 and served in WWII, however when the Korean War came around the military just thought "Hell, we'll thrown on a new stock, a bayonet lug, and an adjustable peep sight (Bit hard to see) and it'll be good to go". So the majority of the equipment had seen long service in WWII, then was served for repairs and sent back to fight in the Korean War. Also, many complained the Carbine lacked stopping power and wouldn't penetrate the enemies thick winter coats. Basically these soldiers had a case of "BRUH I SHOT YOU LIKE 3 TIMES THIS GAME IS BS" as .30 Carbine can certainly penetrate a lot of things most definitely including ******* coats.
User avatar #82 - kieranbaker ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
My grandfather fought in Korea. He was a firefighter for the airforce. Planes that would get shot up would land, he would put them out, then they would get back in the sky. But sometimes he couldn't put out the fires in time, or they were too close to the bombs left on the ship, sometimes he would have to stand by and watch as some of his friends burned to death or exploded, screaming for help. Because of this and his opinion on the way the military is run nowadays he made me promise him never to join.

He and his squad went up to a town called Ham-Hong but the North Koreans started shooting at them from up on a hill so they had to high-tail it out of there. One day I want to go and visit Ham-Hong, but not in North Korea, once it is just Korea.
#64 - malacare (09/25/2015) [-]
Hope you feel better OP!

I'll post some old videos from my collection for all to enjoy
User avatar #75 to #64 - chuchiereaper [OP]ONLINE (09/25/2015) [-]
Thanks man, that means a lot.
User avatar #105 - betars (09/26/2015) [-]
This was great, but may I add another significance to the war?

Now, you mentioned that UN condemned the NK invasion, yes, but it was ultimately Truman who led the most soldiers into NK as a "military action". His deployment of soldiers into South Korea skipped congress's approval, and to many, it was deemed unconstitutional, but it certainly strengthened executive power in the US.

I mean, no one wanted the commies to win, congress didn't oppose this.
#72 - Bobtheblob (09/25/2015) [-]
Don't forget when the Turks accidentally massacred their South Korean allies because they thought they were Chinese soldiers.
User avatar #88 to #72 - sirkanesixtytwo (09/25/2015) [-]
""""""""accidentally""" """""
User avatar #92 to #72 - ionlywhisper (09/26/2015) [-]
when the **** was this
User avatar #111 - treeboy (10/05/2015) [-]
Interesting fact to add: The SK government weren't actually at the final peace talks because the UN forces decided they were taking too long to agree peace so conveniently forgot to mention it till it was too late.
I did a lot of study for it as my dad was in the British army stationed there.
#107 - RKOViper ONLINE (09/26/2015) [-]
My grandpa was a Korean War vet. Machine gunner in the 45th Infantry, 180th Infantry Regiment, Dog Company. He died before I was born but he told my dad stories and my dad's told them to me and written papers that I've read. At one point his regiment was literally positioned so closely to the North Koreans' that you could hit it by throwing a rock, this was just because of the necessity to hold ground, if they moved any farther back the North Koreans would take the land. Americans would sleep with their sidearms in hand because groups of North Koreans would literally sneak into their positions at night and try to nab them up as prisoners. The Russian backing of the North Koreans mentioned obviously included firearms (see pic 1: troops are holding burp guns (PPSH's)). A couple stories I've been told really stood out, the first involving the burp guns. American troops in Korea were often issued flak jackets, on several occasions after battles Americans would pick bullets from the burp guns out of each other's flak jackets because they weren't strong enough to penetrate them, afterwards it looked like a rat had gotten to them and chewed several holes in them. Another was when the North Koreans somehow commandeered an American recoilless rifle (essentially a larger, more powerful bazooka mounted on a tripod). Evidently, the North Koreans had never heard the term "backblast area," and a group of them got behind it to fire it and were consequently blown to bits. Finally, one involved my grandpa having to beat a North Korean to death with an entrenching tool (the term my dad used, presumably a shovel). These stories (along with others, war-related or otherwise) give me a deep respect for my grandpa. I really wish I could have met him, but he died just a year before I was born and I was named after him. My first tattoo was/is dedicated to him. Seeing this comp. made my night. Rest in peace, Grandpa Bob. Pic related: Grandpa Bob in his prime on Hill 854.
User avatar #108 to #107 - RKOViper ONLINE (09/26/2015) [-]
Should have mentioned, he was there from late summer of '52 to July '53. Pic was taken in September '52.
User avatar #109 to #108 - RKOViper ONLINE (09/26/2015) [-]
Also a staff sergeant in the pic. Left Korea a master sergeant.
#100 - herpederpderp (09/26/2015) [-]
Question, is the ship at the bottom an Iowa class?
User avatar #101 to #100 - chuchiereaper [OP]ONLINE (09/26/2015) [-]
seems like it, the hull is the same shape, same looking guns. Could be
#52 - shleker (09/25/2015) [-]
"Jesus alright yeah I remember you too Aussies, you and all the commonwealth helped in this war too, mentioned."

>not mentioning the french soldiers
>you are a dick

Just kidding, but I think you should just take more time to do your posts, this one is clearly not as good as the WW1 comp for example, and you should also show the losses for both sides.
[ 111 comments ]
 Friends (0)