Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(157):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 157 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
136 comments displayed.
Reply
+431
#15 - bluenebula (11/11/2015) [-]
#NationalOffendACollegeStudentDay

I have to get in on this.
Reply
+168
#43 to #15 - morebuckets (11/11/2015) [-]
My favorite has been "I disagree"
Reply
+87
#74 to #43 - ugoboom ONLINE (11/12/2015) [-]
Reply
+6
#117 to #74 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
Reply
+13
#111 to #43 - newnewfag (11/12/2015) [-]
That's a bit too far
Reply
+147
#22 - Abortedwafflez (11/11/2015) [-]
Man, based mom isn't even trying to be polite anymore. Just being straight savage now.
Reply
-149
User avatar #7 - bounod ONLINE (11/11/2015) [-]
"Christina Marie Hoff Sommers (born 1950) is an American author and former philosophy professor known for her writings about feminism in contemporary American culture." -wiki

She's also making videos in youtube under name Factual Feminist calling feminist bs.

So nope.. she's not just some random "based mom" or even "yolo woman"
Reply
+36
#45 to #7 - baconlogic (11/11/2015) [-]
So why did people downvote this? all i read is that she has some actual weight behind her arguments other than being an internet favourite("based mom").
Reply
+15
#77 to #45 - imgood (11/12/2015) [-]
Cause everyone already knows all that.
Plus it's based mom, everyone knows that she is based mom for all the reasons he listed
Reply
+2
User avatar #96 to #45 - catburglarpenis (11/12/2015) [-]
We downvoted it because we don't know how to read and that makes being on the internet quite difficult help
Reply
-1
#154 to #45 - anon (11/25/2015) [-]
mainly she's a feminist from a time when women in developed nations had a few things to bitch about like the actual wage gap

modern feminism is just nonsense
Reply
+24
#12 to #7 - anon (11/11/2015) [-]
Have you been on the internet in the last year?
Reply
+23
#18 to #7 - imho (11/11/2015) [-]
you should probably overdose on painkillers now. Just because it'll save you some pain for when you blindly walk into traffic, or stick a fork in an electrical outlet due to your incredible retardation
Reply
+23
#37 to #7 - anon (11/11/2015) [-]
Don't you dare talk **** about yolo woman, she's a saint.
Reply
+44
#55 to #7 - dasbrot (11/11/2015) [-]
Your point is...
Reply
+29
#66 to #55 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
Just taking a shot in the dark here, but.....

Doesn't being a professor lend credibility to her stance? Is that not relevant here?

You know what, while we're at it.... who cares if she is really "based mom"? Based mom is a meme. Christina Marie Hoff Sommers IS more than a stupid meme, she is a respected academic.

This crap is the reason I became anon.
Reply
+9
User avatar #67 to #66 - dasbrot (11/12/2015) [-]
#7 is getting hate because it suggests that "Based Mom" is an inappropriate nickname for her because it supposedly labels her as some amateur. The name has nothing to do with her accolades and qualifications because it is just an affectionate name given to her.

She has an opinion not commonly associated with modern feminism (i.e. "based") and gives off a calm, reasonable demeanor in the videos she posted concerning the gamergate thing (i.e. "mom"). And she probably is an actual mother as well.

We internet folk like to give people nicknames and this is one of them.
Reply
0
#119 to #67 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
check your pronouns and nicknames next time
Reply
+1
#121 to #119 - dasbrot (11/12/2015) [-]
Assuming this is the same anon as #66:

Stop telling people what to do because you are irritated by a ******* name and get over it?
Reply
+22
User avatar #20 to #7 - ronyx (11/11/2015) [-]
That comment should be a crime and admin should imprison you and rape you through the nose.
Reply
+22
User avatar #21 to #7 - serhiy (11/11/2015) [-]
there are several different levels of retarded in this comment.
Reply
+22
#38 to #7 - crixuz (11/11/2015) [-]
What made you think otherwise?
Reply
+23
#49 to #7 - davidbowiesensei (11/11/2015) [-]
Well... yeah. Everyone knew all that already. Her Factual Feminist videos calling out 3rd wave Feminism on their victim-complex ******** is the entire reason the internet started calling her "Based mom". Everyone knew about her background in Feminism. What was the point of your comment? Why did you think we called her Based Mom?
Reply
+23
User avatar #59 to #7 - obviousxplains (11/11/2015) [-]
we've been calling her based mom since gamergate started
Reply
+32
User avatar #16 to #7 - newprinny ONLINE (11/11/2015) [-]
Last year during the whole GamerGate thing, she supported the gamers' side (at least as far as saying that video games didn't make you more inherently sexist and feminists are trying to divert the point of the issue) and because of, I guess, how motherly she seemed in the way she spoke and acted, people started calling her "based mom," dood.
Reply
+155
User avatar #11 to #7 - kafei (11/11/2015) [-]
That's why she's Based Mom.
Reply
+408
#1 - kafei (11/11/2015) [-]
If all feminists were first-wave like Based Mom, who were really more like egalitarians, I wouldn't have such a problem with them.
Reply
0
User avatar #152 to #1 - theugandanhero (11/21/2015) [-]
Well, yeah.
Reply
+4
User avatar #60 to #1 - fatsigurd (11/11/2015) [-]
except many first-wave feminists were just like they are today
extremist marxists who hate men
ask Erin Pizzey, she had a lot of experience with those so called "egalitarian" feminists
Reply
+27
User avatar #71 to #60 - kanadetenshi (11/12/2015) [-]
I think you're confusing first and second wave. The people who attacked Pizzey were second wave.

Though the first wave did a lot of stupid **** as well, like promoting prohibition and the White Feather Campaign.
Reply
+14
User avatar #69 to #60 - kurbeh (11/12/2015) [-]
First wave feminism was so long ago everyone who was a part of it is dead by now.
How on earth is someone I can ask supposed to have expirience with those people?
Reply
+6
User avatar #68 to #60 - tevansroskos (11/12/2015) [-]
First wave was a push for suffrage. Second wave was a push for equality socially and in the work place. Third wave is "bringing down the patriarchy." I'm sure there were people in each wave that didn't like men but it wasn't what the first wave was about.
Reply
+4
#73 to #68 - ilikor (11/12/2015) [-]
FIrst wave was a push for suffrage without the obligations of the draft, first wave was non-egalitarian as **** in the US.
Reply
+3
#87 to #60 - biater (11/12/2015) [-]
All those snobs... wanting to vote... own property...
Reply
+5
User avatar #88 to #60 - umbrage (11/12/2015) [-]
to be fair if I lived as a second-class citizen due to my gender I'd probably sign up for all kinds of crazy **** like Marxism

the crazies nowadays have no excuse
Reply
+4
User avatar #92 to #1 - advice (11/12/2015) [-]
based mom is best mom
Reply
+130
User avatar #6 to #1 - kikisu ONLINE (11/11/2015) [-]
She's second wave not first. First wave feminism was way back in the really early 1900's and dealt with women's suffrage their right to vote . Second wave feminism was about equality in the work force.
Reply
+24
User avatar #8 to #6 - lordroscor (11/11/2015) [-]
Also the most important thing that is overlooked is that first wave wasn't actually very inclusive, they only believed white woman should receive the same pay is men...
Reply
+25
User avatar #10 to #8 - kafei (11/11/2015) [-]
I believe it was the second-wave that worried about the equal pay. The first-wave was focused on sufferage (or the right to vote). However, yes, the first-wave was very non-inclusive.
Reply
+4
User avatar #14 to #10 - lordroscor (11/11/2015) [-]
Right you are I had my second wave and first wave mixed around, props to you
Reply
+1
User avatar #9 to #6 - kafei (11/11/2015) [-]
You make good points, but to be honest I don't even know if I could put her in a "wave". She doesn't really fit any of them with her current views, and I'm not sure why she's still calling herself a feminist and not egalitarian (unless she is now, I've kind of dropped out of loop).
Reply
+87
#33 - raidaltamimi (11/11/2015) [-]
Electrical engineering master race reporting in.....
Reply
0
User avatar #90 to #33 - bobthejob (11/12/2015) [-]
thats what I am going into 2 years at a community than going to Rolla, Missouri
Reply
0
#151 to #33 - angryaxolotl (11/15/2015) [-]
Want to be assaulted by your profs in the rear come each test? Join electrical!
lol jokes I love electricak, though it makes me cry sometimes
electrical in my school has atleast 40% girls in it.
Reply
0
User avatar #115 to #33 - augisnvm (11/12/2015) [-]
Nuclear energy physics. 2/19 girls.
Reply
+1
User avatar #51 to #33 - mattnn (11/11/2015) [-]
Going first year here, we got 8 in our class of 40. Its more than the second and third year combined.
Reply
+1
#89 to #51 - danthemanftw (11/12/2015) [-]
Dude it gets worse. I think girls start to switch from electrical engineering to biomedical engineering or computer science. I think there is only 1 in my class left now from like 10 freshman year.
Reply
+3
#97 to #89 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
2nd year robotic engineering checking in, 8 girls in a year group of 110... out of those, roughly 0 are dickable

...pic somewhat ridiculously related
Reply
+1
#93 to #33 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
Fourth year EE reporting in. Going for a fifth and a minor in physics. Can't wait for grad school. Pic related. It's the bane of my life.
Reply
+1
#125 to #93 - deutschblut (11/12/2015) [-]
If you can make it to your 5th year...
Reply
+3
#103 to #33 - IamPinhead (11/12/2015) [-]
>master race
I've done some of your coursework. It's more like 'masochist' race.
Reply
+4
#120 to #33 - smudgiemuffins (11/12/2015) [-]
******* Electrical Engineers being all useful to society and **** .

Choose a real academic degree like pure mathematics where you spend hours proving obvious theorems and drink to cope with the emotional emptiness.
Reply
0
User avatar #124 to #120 - killjoyus (11/12/2015) [-]
******* math geek, being all fancy and educated.

Choose a real degree and go into Poli-sci, where you study assholes of the past in preparation to be come a bigger one in the future. All the while drinking enough to kill a frat house because you realized you are going to be a corporate sellout once or twice on the road you've chosen
Reply
+14
#64 to #33 - ztheart (11/11/2015) [-]
**ztheart used "*roll 1, 1-1000000*"**
**ztheart rolls 0,322,333** Ohm Resistor reporting in.
Reply
+9
#72 to #33 - nigeltheoutlaw (11/12/2015) [-]
I'm mechanical engineering myself. It's been nothing but misery and half the college is a ******* towel head or a ching chong.
Reply
+2
User avatar #76 to #72 - defectivedetective (11/12/2015) [-]
Most of the mechanical engineers on my campus are white people.. and then the foreigners and ching chongs like me.. I like it so far
Reply
+1
#95 to #76 - nigeltheoutlaw (11/12/2015) [-]
I actually like the Allahu Ackbars and Cat Eaters just fine most of the time and even befriended a couple, but what pisses me off is a lack of basic English skills when I am expected to work with them. If I have to carry one more ******* group of semi-literate foreigners then I'm gonna ******* REEEE so hard that the crust cracks. The misery is mainly because of the weather and because I am poor as **** .
Reply
0
#104 to #72 - IamPinhead (11/12/2015) [-]
Me too, buddy. Right now I'm in hell and everything is on fire but it's my senior year so it's okay right?
Reply
+40
User avatar #25 - vorarephilia (11/11/2015) [-]
I'm just gonna toss it out there that when you get down to it, not everybody is wired (hue) for an engineering job. Ladies (and the rest of you penile possessing persons), don't forget that there are things that most forget about but are vital to our society, pay pretty well, but are mainly male dominated. Maintenance.

For example, being an electrician is a hard days work, but doesn't usually require a college degree and provides job training (technically an apprenticeship) and at a salary of $40k -55k a year, it is ok for a family and great for a single person.

Oh sure, everyone talks about how important STEM fields are, but I personally think maintaining and building infrastructure is more important to the day to day world. Computer engineers expect the wall outlets to work after all.

tl;dr not everyone can handle more than highschool algebra. find a job that makes you useful, and happiness will come.
Reply
0
User avatar #48 to #25 - Sethorein ONLINE (11/11/2015) [-]
A friend of mine is an electrician. I'm swimming in debt and he's looking for condos.

We'really all running to the white collar sector so the blue collar sector is becoming a real great place eh?
Reply
-1
User avatar #36 to #25 - jubbak (11/11/2015) [-]
We all know they're vital, and you're more than welcome (even encouraged) to go for the more obscure fields, but what the tweet is saying is that you can't go complaining about 'inequality' when your paycheck doesn't match that of an intensive job.
Reply
-1
User avatar #98 to #25 - catburglarpenis (11/12/2015) [-]
You know what? I've never ******* agreed with something more on this site my whole life.

Honestly, it's kinda the system's fault, not the individual's. This is going to sound communist, but if equal effort is put into something, equal compensation should be given. If you've gotta put in 4 years to be a military officer, ESL teacher, or secretary at a firm, they need to be paid at least relatively the same. I get that a STEM degree is harder to get than others, no one is arguing that. My problem is that these things have the same ******* requirements and award differently. If you are going to award less, drop the ******* requirements and quit being a pretentious prick.

Maybe I'm idealistic.
Reply
+1
#116 to #98 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
>if equal effort is put into something, equal compensation should be given

No
No no no no no you stupid ****
i could put "equal effort" into jacking off all day but that doesnt mean i should be equaly compensated for it
Effert means jack **** , it doesnt matter how hard you work, what matters is what is the effect of your work on society, how it improves our society, how needed is your work and how many people can do it.
Reply
0
User avatar #138 to #116 - catburglarpenis (11/13/2015) [-]
I meant the effort required to get the actual paid position, not the position itself.

This "equal requirements rewarded equally" concept is present in the U.S. Military of which I am a part, and like most people, I would just like the Utopian society that the military represents to extend forth into the civilian world, is all.
Reply
+1
#113 to #98 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
Maybe in an ideal world but jobs aren't all equal. If they were they'd all pay the same, be in the same demand, be the same difficulty/ease, require the same amount of training/study, have the same amount of available positions, etc.
Reply
+1
#108 to #98 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
Stem degree's have a lot higher requirments where i live(Canada). And also who gets to decide which jobs are worth the same?
Reply
+6
User avatar #34 to #25 - TheMather ONLINE (11/11/2015) [-]
Actually, the vocational education required to become a licensed electrician is STEM. An electrician is required to know all the same basic laws of electricity as electrical engineers are.
Reply
0
User avatar #47 to #34 - satansferret (11/11/2015) [-]
Thank you.
Reply
+7
User avatar #27 to #25 - xoyv (11/11/2015) [-]
i don't think the point of the comment is "get an engineering job" but more "don't major in something useless, get a degree in something that will get you a decent job"
Reply
+1
User avatar #28 to #27 - vorarephilia (11/11/2015) [-]
Probably.
Reply
+10
#82 - littlejonn (11/12/2015) [-]
The "How to Piss Off a College Student" Webm Guide

1.) Go to Math Class expecting to learn math and not gender equality

This **** is wild. Buckle up.
Reply
0
User avatar #112 to #82 - Haentar (11/12/2015) [-]
Eek.
Reply
0
#131 to #82 - billburr (11/12/2015) [-]
What do you think college is?
Reply
+1
User avatar #127 to #82 - mrlester (11/12/2015) [-]
im at work without headphones. Can someone give me the short version of whats been said in the video?
Reply
+6
#54 - billburr (11/11/2015) [-]
I hope everyone understands that life is a little bit more complicated than this
Reply
+10
User avatar #61 to #54 - heartlessrobot (11/11/2015) [-]
Well, at least one part is simple.
If you want good pay, don't go for a worthless job.
Reply
+2
#62 to #61 - billburr (11/11/2015) [-]
"Worthless"
You mean like teachers? They don't make **** in the US
All I'm saying is that a man with a philosophy degree isn't used as an argument against the so-called "Men's rights movement"
Reply
+3
User avatar #65 to #62 - pebar (11/11/2015) [-]
they have the best job security of any industry.
In california, students actually sued the school district because the teachers unions were so powerful that bad teachers couldn't be fired. The students argued that being taught by bad teachers deprived them of an education so they were being treated differently under the law (14th amendment).
They won the case.
The case might end up in the supreme court

so no.... they are very well-compensated

the price system very well tells what occupations are and are not worthless since your pay is what other people are willing to give you to do what you do
Reply
+1
#70 to #65 - datswag (11/12/2015) [-]
Teacher here

I'm on salary for 32.5 a year, and I work 48 hours a week. My job security is pretty good because my students pass tests but that's every job. If you don't suck you don't lose your job.
Reply
0
#130 to #70 - billburr (11/12/2015) [-]
You should move up here to Canada! I don't know how any country can justify underpaying teachers; they're almost literally the most important people in our society.

Isn't the US school system all fragmented as well? Like one part of a city will be managed/ funded entirely differently than others?
Reply
0
#144 to #130 - datswag (11/13/2015) [-]
Little late on the response but absolutely yes. There's two elementary schools in my district and we get alot less funding. Ironically they do better on standardized tests, have more parental and student involvement in after a chill activities. My school doesn't even have wifi yet. It's a struggle I have to work with. But I love my job and I wouldn't trade it for the world
Reply
0
#147 to #144 - billburr (11/13/2015) [-]
It's a great thing that some people are still that passionate about their work!
But I don't think it's ironic that they do better; it's a symptom of a bad system. You put the most resources into the schools that middle/upper class students go to and they tend to do better. Not to mention the extra parental resources/ time On the other hand, if you take the lower-income families and under-fund the schools it's no wonder they do worse! And the parents tend to be less involved, sometimes through no fault of their own
Reply
0
#128 to #65 - billburr (11/12/2015) [-]
I think you have too much faith in the so-called "Free" market. Lot's of bartenders make more money than teachers but only an idiot would call bartending a more worthwhile occupation than teaching. Not to judge bartenders, but this seems pretty obvious
The reason that some public schools have bad teachers is generally because they pay lower salaries and have generally lower budgets all around. Unsurprisingly, public schools in lower income areas suffer from this moreso.
Blaming the teachers union for underfunded schools is stupid. You should blame the lobbyists and politicians who have systematically de-funded public education. They do this for because public schools don't make any money
Reply
0
User avatar #133 to #128 - pebar (11/12/2015) [-]
What makes you think teachers are better than bartenders?
Because you think so?
If you want to know what people truely think, look at how people vote with their dollars to see what they value the most.

modern public school teachers are nothing more than glorified babysitters
Reply
0
#135 to #133 - billburr (11/12/2015) [-]
And the reason that teachers are "Glorified babysitters" in some areas is that they're unmotivated and the schools are underfunded and entirely focused on standardized testing.

I live in Canada and our teachers were for the most part great. They also start at $45 K and cap at around $80K plus excellent benefits. And since we don't have as many private schools, the rich kids go to public school too which ensures they're decently well-funded
Reply
0
User avatar #136 to #135 - pebar (11/12/2015) [-]
"pay us more and we'll work better"

if anyone tried that in the private sector, they would get laughed at
teachers are **** because of piss poor government management
the quality every single other government service

you have no incentive to do goo when the people in charge pay no price for being wrong
Reply
0
#137 to #136 - billburr (11/12/2015) [-]
Then why is it that better funded public schools perform better?
I'm not saying it's the only reason the US education system has slipped but it's hard to attract people to a profession that is difficult, low-paying, and requires countless unpaid hours of work.
Paying individuals more doesn't increase performance but better compensation in an industry increases the number of people (and therefore the number of qualified people) who enter that industry.
Would you want to be a teacher for $35k a year when you could be a janitor for $30k and work half the hours? It's great that some people are still willing to teach at such low wages but it affects the number of qualified and talented people who will
Reply
0
#134 to #133 - billburr (11/12/2015) [-]
I don't think that teachers are "better" than bartenders. I think that teaching is a more valuable occupation than bartending, the difference should be obvious but I'll explain it.
Step 1: Imagine a world without teachers
Step 2: Imagine a world without bartenders
Step 3: Shame.

Do you really think that people "Vote with their dollars" on teacher's salaries? It's decided by school boards, bureaucrats, and politicians. Not to mention that private-sector wages are determined by the minimum wage necessary to get a sufficiently qualified and motivated workforce.

Your view on the world is too simple. Nuance is life
Reply
0
User avatar #122 to #62 - killjoyus (11/12/2015) [-]
"worthless" as in its a job that only exists because it creates its own market. Gender equality and modern feminist based classes and jobs are largely useless in America and require problems to be created for the job to do anything
Reply
0
#129 to #122 - billburr (11/12/2015) [-]
And philosophy would fall under the exact same category.
Also, people don't do degrees in women's studies to become professional feminists, they do it to learn. Most arts degrees give you approximately the same qualifications: research/ writing, and a piece of paper saying you have a BA. You might as well get a piece of paper you enjoy or are interested in
Reply
0
User avatar #139 to #129 - killjoyus (11/13/2015) [-]
sure, but thing is if that piece of paper costs thousands of dollars, which for me it does, then you should probably find something you enjoy that also has a good job security behind it.
Reply
0
#140 to #139 - billburr (11/13/2015) [-]
I'm not saying that I would encourage someone to do an arts degree if they wanted to make money Although most well-paying office jobs only require a degree
I just think that people use every "bad decision" made by any woman to criticize all women. Woman's studies isn't holding women back any more than taking a couple philosophy courses held me back. And maybe they'll find, as I did, that not everything that can improve you is directly related to an increase in pay. I feel like I've become a harder working person since reading Nicomachean ethics and a lot of women feel like harder working people after reading cosmo or whatever they teach in those classes
Reply
0
User avatar #141 to #140 - killjoyus (11/13/2015) [-]
i mean sure believe as you like, i was just quantifying what a "worthless" degree would mean.
Reply
0
#142 to #141 - billburr (11/13/2015) [-]
I understand what people mean when they say "worthless degree", I just don't think it's a valid criticism of the feminist movement. And in today's job market a degree in business or any non-practical science is worth almost exactly the same
Reply
0
User avatar #143 to #142 - killjoyus (11/13/2015) [-]
to be fair i wasn't saying anything about feminism in specific, just the overt liberal generation
Reply
0
#146 to #143 - billburr (11/13/2015) [-]
Yeah fair enough, I might have been talking past you a little bit!
And I don't think anyone owes you a job or anything; that's on you. I just also think that people get a little too caught up in trying to get a 'valuable degree' at the expense of their happiness.
Reply
+18
User avatar #3 - wcpapier ONLINE (11/11/2015) [-]
Based moms even joins, what a time to be alive
Reply
+7
User avatar #106 - rudeobuteo (11/12/2015) [-]
Peter Schiff had a good point about the gender wage gap: if women do the same job for 30% less, companies would be hiring women left and right because they would have to pay them 30% less for the same work a man would do.
Reply
+1
#114 to #106 - lordraine ONLINE (11/12/2015) [-]
Basic logic, clean fingernails, and the ability to solve 2+2 is all you need to defeat nine out of ten progressive liberal talking points and political arguments.

That there is an entire party of these people, and not, say, McCarthy Blue Dog Democrats, Jeffersonian Libertarians, Constitutional Traditionalists, or Paleoconservatives is an indicator of exactly how far we have fallen, and how much academia is contributing to the problem.

Cultural Marxism has grown to the point where the Democrats are openly Communist apologists now. This **** has got to stop.
Reply
0
#132 to #114 - billburr (11/12/2015) [-]
* 9 out of 10 imaginary straw-man arguments

And democrats aren't remotely progressive, nor are republicans conservative. The US has a system of legal bribery (unlimited, undisclosed corporate donations to politicians) which obscures any kind of ideological conviction on either side.
There are exceptions to this Like Bernie, who at the very least believes what he says but I don't see too big of a difference between Hilary and the establishment republicans on most issues
Reply
0
#145 to #132 - lordraine ONLINE (11/13/2015) [-]
Bernie believes what he says, but that's just worse for him, not better, since Bernie is a Communist.

It's a sign of how far we've fallen that someone who openly wants to convert America to Communism can run for office without getting lynched by the public or disappeared by the feds.
Reply
-1
#148 to #145 - billburr (11/13/2015) [-]
Bernie is not openly or at all a communist; he's a socialist.
If you think he's a communist you get your information from the wrong sources, and clearly not from him. I would recommend sitting down and listening to an unedited interview or debate so you can see what he really believes. It's possible you'd still disagree but at least it would be informed disagreement
For the record, the US is a socialist country. It doesn't have all of the social programs that other socialist countries like Canada, Germany, the UK, or most of Europe have but it is a socialist country nonetheless.
Reply
0
#149 to #148 - lordraine ONLINE (11/15/2015) [-]
He called for a worker uprising to start a political revolution to destroy the current establishment and force the rich pay for everything.

Do you ***** who support Bernie even listen to anything he says? Those are his exact words. It is not hyperbole. He flat out stated this in the Democratic debate.

He's a ******* Communist. Anyone who says otherwise is a ******* imbecile.
Reply
0
#150 to #149 - billburr (11/15/2015) [-]
Bernie has never advocated for non-democratic revolution. He regularly criticizes people who do. In fact he said that the problem with the Occupy Wall Street movement was that they didn't have a voter registration booth. What he is asking for is the American people to stand up to the rampant corruption in Washington and vote in politicians who respect the people
I watched the debate and he definitely didn't say that. Did you actually watch it? Send me a clip if you really think he said this
Reply
+7
#105 - alexaalovely (11/12/2015) [-]
I can almost feel the amount of triggered white women in the replies
Reply
+14
#78 - ohlookporn (11/12/2015) [-]
Based mom strikes again.
Reply
+6
#4 - europe (11/11/2015) [-]
Based mom is at it again
Reply
-1
#26 - itumblr (11/11/2015) [-]
This is a dumb and ignorant post because that's not going to stop employers from paying women less. If anything ,we need more women in gender studies to spread the message about this problem.
Reply
0
#50 to #26 - anon (11/11/2015) [-]
ez bait. dont thumb down
Reply
0
User avatar #29 to #26 - raginhardon (11/11/2015) [-]
with a name like that, bait is mehhhhhhh at best. good try tho.
Reply
0
User avatar #46 to #26 - Sethorein ONLINE (11/11/2015) [-]
inane frothing

The bait... it hurts me...
Reply
0
#30 to #26 - blazingsoul (11/11/2015) [-]
Nice b8 m8
Reply
0
#52 to #30 - tylevans (11/11/2015) [-]
i r8 8/8
Reply
+1
#32 to #26 - gaminggenus (11/11/2015) [-]
You nearly had me then. Well played sir!
Reply
+4
User avatar #44 to #26 - faithrider (11/11/2015) [-]
mmmmm... scrumptious bait
Reply
+2
User avatar #75 - censius (11/12/2015) [-]
The problem with third wave feminism is that there is no clear goal. First and second wave feminism were vying for changes in the ammendments, the constitution, and local/state laws to allow and enforce the right to work and the right to vote.
If Obama asked a third wave feminist what their demands were, there would be no logical request. There's no law that can be changed that can make female life more equal, at least not for the issues that are being brought up. You can't make "manspreading" illegal, or require someone to not judge a fat person.
Reply
+2
User avatar #42 - faithrider (11/11/2015) [-]
based mom does it again
Reply
+3
#5 - ashampoo (11/11/2015) [-]
**ashampoo used "*roll picture*"**
**ashampoo rolled image**thanks based mom
Reply
-3
#86 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
Reply
+1
#107 to #86 - anon (11/12/2015) [-]
and you jerk alone
Reply
+1
#53 - anon (11/11/2015) [-]
maybe pick a better day for this....

11th of November is probably not the best.
Reply
0
User avatar #79 to #53 - dorfdorfdorf (11/12/2015) [-]
how is this tweet related to veterans day?
Reply
0
User avatar #85 to #79 - garymuthafuknoak (11/12/2015) [-]
but.... you know. today is a day for grieving.... not for, getting pissed off or pissing others off.
Reply
-3
#123 to #85 - deutschblut (11/12/2015) [-]
Grieving?

Today is the day I use my VA card and get free meals and discounts all over the city!

**** those kids in Afghanistan! Where's my free deep-fried blooming onion at?
0
#84 to #79 - garymuthafuknoak has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
0
#23 - kaboomz (11/11/2015) [-]
rekt
12>
[ 157 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)