Assuming that every antivaccer has this agressive antivac agenda is rather stupid.
This is a pretty interesting dilemma:
There are two groups of antivaccers: One that speaks of it, and one that doesn't.
If I speak of it, I'm a part of the former group. If I don't speak of it, there is only one group, and it's the former. Loss/Loss and everyone who is against it thinks of me as one of these twats with the retardedly aggressive agenda.
Other people can vaccinate themselves and their children, and that helps me and my children to avoid the various diseases.
You don't need to be aggressive to be an idiot. I would even say that a nice and polite idiot is even worse than an aggressive one, because you can simply tell the latter to **** off and usually have to debate with the former for some time, facing such incredible arguments as:
- My idiot friends think the same
- There are many sources - just check
You need to login to view this link
- It doesn't matter I've been sick for more time than I've been healthy, vaccines would have killed me
And so on...
Your logic falls apart when you consider the concept of the "safer assumption" when dealing with chance and probability. Unless you have a valid concern which can only come about from your kid receiving the vaccine, the safest assumption is that you need to receive the vaccine to avoid major illness. This is because of the fact that if everyone were to follow your example, no one would get the vaccine, and the plan would fall apart. Your plan is only efficient if as few people follow it as possible, making it a maladaptive plan of action the more its advertised and followed.
So then, what valid reason could you have to avoid getting the vaccine?
And you're a colossal idiot for thinking your plan of action is anything close to reaping benefits. You're taking a needless risk for the same outcome.
And you NOT vaccinating puts not only your children at risk, but those around them, too.
Be retarded all you like, but don't be a dick. Vaccinate. There is no logical reason why you shouldn't.
"This is a pretty interesting dilemma"
"There are two groups of antivaccers"
No, there's only one, anyone who doesn't vaccinate themselves or their children is a ******* moron, no dilemma, end of discussion.
Mommy, why am I blind and do my legs not work?.. well.. would you have rather had a vaccine, boy? trust me, you're way better of blind and crippled than vaccinated
Nothing bad ever happens.
The vaccine injury fund is a myth and it's a perfect world.
Nobody got paralyzed from the immune response to the polio vaccine.
1 in 64 kids born with autism in 2014.
It's genetic, you either get it or you don't, can't do nuffin bout it.
Not like toxic additives in such mirco doses can affect infants. ******* morons, how dare they jeopardize their children and ours because they don't trust these companies and the FDA.
Even if vaccines did cause adverse affects and brain damage it's better than getting small pox and polio.
How do you think these companies plan to make their money back when it costs almost a billion dollars to pass drugs through the FDA?
More sickness, more money.
I kind of don't get why so many adults against getting themselves vaccinated. It takes an hour, 59 minutes of which is spent waiting in line, every couple of years.