By other muslims, due to muslim made law.. other than that, good effort tho.

How dare you share facts

Yea my bad 'muzlem r ebul, ref you g? mor like terist'

Are you sure?
(i only found TYT video,sorry)
But i'm not saying they don't get killed by Muslims,
black people kill other black people,white people kill other white people,
the same thing goes to Islam,
but the way you write it sound like the Majority are Muslims killing Muslims while now racism and Islamphobia is like a joke nowadays,but we can't deny the fact that it's exist,not stronger than before,but still powerful enough to take teens and young adult lives,and i don't think it's a small thing,
Yea his right,Muslim do get killed,by people,and people get killed,by other people.

anything to back that up m80?

globalnews.ca/news/2343508/muslim-woman-attacked-while-picking-up-children-from-toronto-school-police/

I literally searched "Muslims beaten up in Toronto" and went to the "News" category...

In Islam there is the Shi'a sect and the Sunni sect. I think ISIS and other Islamic terrorists are Sunni and they kill Shi'as where they find them.
Though I think I need to expand #9's comment, Shia Muslims are beaten and tortured by ISIS, which follows the Sunni sect.
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/05/economist-explains-19
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/4-questions-ISIS-rebels-use-to-tell-Sunni-from-Shia/articleshow/37257563.cms

muslims killing muslims?

i dont really think that applies

Both Sunni and Shi'a are Islam.
Technically a Sunni killing a Shi'a would be a muslim killing a muslim.

that's what i'm saying. muslim on muslim hate doesn't count

One side of a group starts to kill the other side repeatedly, but you say it doesn't count? Don't you think it makes more sense to separate the good from the bad in that group and classify them differently? Oh right, that's when they are called terrorists. So it does count.

Doesn't count as what?

the original post was about muslims being killed for being muslim. as in a non-muslim person kills a muslim persosn because of their idealogical differences. muslims killing muslims is not islamophobia.

And here an article i just found ISIS(or IS i don't ******* care) killing Sunni and Shi'as in the same time.
www.cbsnews.com/news/isis-deadly-bombing-yemen-mosque-sunni-shiite-muslims/

While you say it's true,ISIS attacks Sunni sect as well,bombing mosque kidnapping torturing,not only Shi'as,in other words,they not belong to any group,they're terrorist,
www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/06/suicide-bomber-attacks-mosque-in-saudi-arabia

People get there **** kicked in for their religion all the time, you'd have to ride the short bus to think otherwise.

qz.com/416101/islamophobia-is-killing-myanmars-rohingya-but-the-muslim-world-can-help/

so one tribe in one country

claps 4 u. absolutely nothing compared to what islamic terrorists do. and it's also NOT BECAUSE THEY'RE MUSLIM, its because of their tribe. russia is largely atheist, but if you started killing russias because of their race, you wouldnt be able to say they were atheists being killed for being atheists. they're muslims being killed for being rohingya.

Muslim Buddhist conflicts are well documented, this is literally the first article I could find.

hooray! what does that have to do with this?

and if buddhists, the most peaceful religious people on the planet, want to kill you, then maybe you're doing something wrong

Op claimed Islamaphobia amounted to mild discrimination, that's patently false.

in the entire world, it's patently true. if your world is limited to ****** myanmar, then congratulations, you're correct.

>shows you article backing up his assertion
>"w-well it's just one place"

wew lad

>"w-well its just one place"

That's the point, dumbass.

>dumbass

good insult

>can't even provide a counterarguement so I should just try to nitpick this guy's comment

wew lad nice retort

YepItsAutism.jpeg

>"h-he must be autistic! i'll win th-this argument if i call hm autistic!"

wew lad

You just keep getting worse. Stop typing. Think about how you look in third person.

>"h-he looks so stupid!"

wew

WEW LAD WEW LAD WEW LAD XD

Cock off ya cock.

>"i'll just k-keep repeating what he says!!!"

wew

Your name is way to ******* blue for this to be serious.

>"b-b-but your name is blue! w-why won't you ag-g-g-gree with me?"

wew lad

"i'll g-go anon and reply to him to make h-him look stupid!"

wew lad

This is really depressing to look at.

"i-i'm winning!!!"

wew

Kek. Screencapping. This was a fun thread. Thank you for all this cancer by replying to obvious bait. All this cringe can supply a whole cringe comp.

"i-i was just joking!!! trolled1!!!!"

wew

Sure, I get it, you assume you win because you're misquoting me. You get 10 Good Boy points. Happy? You now have enough to buy 5 chicken tendies.

Now **** off, cringelord.

"i'll call him a cringelord! h-haha!"

lad wew

This is sad.

>>#84
Understood.

>>#81
They must suffer from a serious stuttering problem from where you come from.

Don't bother replying. I don't want you to lose 10 IQ points by reading this guy's crap.

"i-i'll post hitler! then he'll look dumb!"

lad

myanmar doesn't represent the world, einstein.

wew, nice insulting lad you really got me

so are you going to confront my point or act superior?

all you've done is insult me lad, nothing to act superior about

If sectarian violence against Muslims is a real thing then Islamaphobia would lead to more than just mild discrimination.

you are correct

which makes me wonder why it doesnt happen more often

It happens fairly often in southeast asia.

again

southeast asia =/= the world

or even a big place, for that matter. there's a lot of ways in which southeast asia is archaic. can you name a first world country where this **** happens?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Muslims#Russia

If you keep scrolling down you'll also get to the modern era.

i like how the only entry in france's section is reacting to a mass shooting, and over half of the actions are verbal. wow. holy **** . such sectarian violence.

You realize focusing on the emptiest section is cherry picking right?

here's one that actually has something that might help you, tajikistan (boy oh boy it sounds tolerant)
muslim mosques have indeed been targeted, shut down, and destroyed. as well as building for Jehovah's Witnesses, Protestant churches, and Jewish Synagogues. discrimination? ye. only against muslims? ha.
they have very strict rules and regulations against every religion, including muslims. but Jehovah's Witnesses have been banned. banned. yet again, discrimination against muslims is combined with discrimination for LITERALLY ******* EVERYONE.

www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/frightening-attacks-leave-ontario-muslims-shaken-1.3323107 just gonna leave this here

ok, let's do the good ol US of A

reacting to 9/oneone
one person being robbed and stabbed, there's something actually on your side
someone was asked "are you a muslim?" and stabbed in the neck when he answered "yes" much like the monthly school shootings where people are asked if they're christian and get shot in the face
someone got pushed into a train by a literal retard. anti-muslim? yep. criminally insane? also yes. viable proof for you? no sir.
and ten "anti-mosque" incidents a year, which could be bombings or could be writing "titties and bacon" in graffiti, it doesn't specify. also comparable to the anti-christian church incidents which are much higher in number

so

so still

you dont got much

>>#67 remember how there were 10 "anti-mosque" incidents last year? there were TWO HUNDRED AND FORTY christian church arsons in 2002. 240 in one year compared to 10 in one year. that ************* muslim persecution, am i right? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_arson#United_States

There are 70 times as many Christians as muslims.

ok, so by that ratio, 35ish churches to 10 mosques. yeah. ok. still doesnt help you.

but would you care to address any other parts of my other 2 comments? or are you just going to try and ignore them?

Jesus christ you're a ******* child.

Maybe not ignore but you selectively sourced. If you'd actually read the document. I have a hard time believing you skipped over Germany and Eastern Europe but read Tajikstan.

That's exactly what you said about Buddhist Muslim conflicts in Southeast Asia.

You're right, I should have said dismiss. Well really ignore is also accurate, but not in the usual context.

Then why the **** are you referring to it? If it's not relevant to the original point there's no reason to reference it.

You only listed the most minimal cases. You ignored the 20 shootings and bombings at mosques post Charlie Hebdo (although hate crimes don't count if they immediately follow a tragedy right?) You ignored the bosnian genocide, dismissed the hundreds and even thousands of attacks in the US post 9/11. It's still a hate crime even if your motivation is a terror attack, lumping all members of a race or religion together still makes it a hate crime. You're choice of insults shows you're capable of handling arguments very maturely though I'm sure.

I thought we were referencing only first world cases no?

I didn't say you ignored them, I said you dismissed them, which you did.

Yes it doesn't for the US, you're right. That doesn't disprove anti Muslim bias however.

Were they listed on france's section? no? then i didnt ******* ignore them, asswipe.

I dont recall ever saying that. And i don't recall you ever saying that. so, no, we ******* werent.

jesus ******* christ, just ******* LOOK at >>#233. you literally say "ignore", and "dismiss" is nowhere in that comment. You are just such a ******* liar.

I never said it did, cunt.

You're entire argument is to cherry pick the least significant areas of the section you feel best supports your argument.

There was ONE school shooting where that happened.

You ignore the hundreds of assaults post 9/11, although I suppose those don't count because they were 'justified', right?

Also the vast majority of those church arsons are racially motivated, according to the source you linked.

except i analyzed every single area of all of the places that i analyzed. i didnt ignore anything from the USA or from France or from Tajikistan, ********* .

ah, yes, how could i forget, there was only one school shoo- www.foxnews.com/world/2015/04/02/garissa-attack-kenya/

i definitely didn't ignore them. im quoting myself now, "reacting to 9/oneone". which means "reacting to 9/11". which means "reacting to a catastrophe, which is different from seeking out someone whose religion did you no harm to attack them and is thus not islamophobia."

"anti-mosque" incidents could be racially motivated. they could also be someone pissing on the wall of a mosque and nothing more, since your source doesnt specify whatsoever.

By other muslims...

"for being Muslim"

My point still stands.

Sweden is kill