Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
145 comments displayed.
#13
-
kikisu (11/04/2015) [-] 
It sucks I can't help but feel a bit of shame because dying your hair fun colors has been associated with SJWs. I love dying my hair different colors because of the look. Pic related.
#189 to #13
-
tkfourtwoone (11/05/2015) [-] "I have absolutely nothing interesting to say about me as a person, so I might as well draw attention to myself with clown hair colors"
#282 to #271
-
mayoroftownsville (11/05/2015) [-]
If you're thirsty get a drink of water, don't pretend ******* factory work of all things is interesting just to win points with some bitch on the internet.
#283 to #282
-
zomitlu (11/05/2015) [-] I literally wanted to know if she did manual labour or some directing **** , since manual labour is uncommon for women to be employed in that would have been interesting
We both know you're showing off for the lady by acting cool with a don't give a **** attitude, just relax man, not every male to female contact is a thirsty retard looking for quick online sex
Also nice joke with the thirsty thing, drink of water? How'd you come up with such flawless mockery?
We both know you're showing off for the lady by acting cool with a don't give a **** attitude, just relax man, not every male to female contact is a thirsty retard looking for quick online sex
Also nice joke with the thirsty thing, drink of water? How'd you come up with such flawless mockery?
#285 to #283
-
mayoroftownsville (11/05/2015) [-]
Also confirmed for never having worked in a factory, it's pretty much an even split by gender. There's no "hard labor" factories in the US, anything requiring muscle has been outsourced to countries with real men.
#124 to #13
-
fishinyourface (11/05/2015) [-] long as you don't act like a cunt, I don't think anyone will judge you for the fun colors.
#188 to #124
-
tkfourtwoone (11/05/2015) [-] I do. Quite often actually.
That's because dying your hair like a clown basically means you're an attention whore.
That's because dying your hair like a clown basically means you're an attention whore.
#88 to #87
-
repostforlife ONLINE (11/05/2015) [-] damn, thats a lot of colors O_o.
but blues your favorite I'm guessing?
but blues your favorite I'm guessing?
#94 to #89
-
repostforlife ONLINE (11/05/2015) [-] Freaking cool, do you go to a salon for it? Or get a friend to help?
#109 to #105
-
repostforlife ONLINE (11/05/2015) [-] Sounds like a lit of fun. And it looks cool on you bro.
nothing wrong with a goth look. I never minded it
nothing wrong with a goth look. I never minded it
#65 to #13
-
pointblankhits (11/05/2015) [-] I think your safe as long as you don't gain 300 pounds and start complaining about how guys sit on the subway
I actually think bright dyed hair can look hot as ****
I actually think bright dyed hair can look hot as ****
#69 to #66
-
pointblankhits (11/05/2015) [-] Hey that's a pretty amazing drop, you should be proud of yourself. That must be one intense job
#60 to #13
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] or you dye your hair because you seek validation of your identity beyond your existence itself
don't get me wrong, you are cute and I would. really, i would. but it is what it is; nobody is perfect.
don't get me wrong, you are cute and I would. really, i would. but it is what it is; nobody is perfect.
#167 to #61
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
But you do waste time on stupid **** like hair color instead of developing intellectually as a person; correct?
#227 to #167
-
enlightednatzie ONLINE (11/05/2015) [-] I waste my time browsing fj
Not to brag but i had a fap marathon last night and woke up 13:00 today
Not to brag but i had a fap marathon last night and woke up 13:00 today
#182 to #167
-
deaminzaints (11/05/2015) [-] Sorry to say it man, but when you are on a site like Funnyjunk, you dont really have anyright to talk do you? hell, saying dying hair is a waste of time is like saying putting a pizza in the oven is a waste of time, guess what, you can do other **** while its done! its this neat little trick called "not freezing up like a deer when you have to concentrate on more than one thing".
but seriously dude, dafuq you mean "developing intellectually"? you could not be more of a pompous hipster even if you tried... i bet you're vegan too...
but seriously dude, dafuq you mean "developing intellectually"? you could not be more of a pompous hipster even if you tried... i bet you're vegan too...
#183 to #182
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
Do as I say, not as I do.
Your not knowing what intellectual development is, kind of proves my point does it not, babby?
<3 dry ur tears...
Your not knowing what intellectual development is, kind of proves my point does it not, babby?
<3 dry ur tears...
#187 to #183
-
deaminzaints (11/05/2015) [-] it really dosent.
you wont know what "DER KOMMER SPYYYYYD" means becourse its a inside-joke on between me and my friends, that dosent mean that you couldnt translate the words and derive meaning from it.
but even if you do, it wont mean the same to you as it means to me.
same goes for a broad concept like "intellectual development".
if you wanna go by simple word defining, intellectual development would simply be development of intellect and since intellect is simply learning, literally most things you do will be intellectual development.
did you know im wearing a grey shirt? probably not, but now you have learned so that just developped your intellect.
not really that fancy is it?
but also, do as i say not as i do is probably the single worst arguement ever
you wont know what "DER KOMMER SPYYYYYD" means becourse its a inside-joke on between me and my friends, that dosent mean that you couldnt translate the words and derive meaning from it.
but even if you do, it wont mean the same to you as it means to me.
same goes for a broad concept like "intellectual development".
if you wanna go by simple word defining, intellectual development would simply be development of intellect and since intellect is simply learning, literally most things you do will be intellectual development.
did you know im wearing a grey shirt? probably not, but now you have learned so that just developped your intellect.
not really that fancy is it?
but also, do as i say not as i do is probably the single worst arguement ever
#194 to #187
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
I guess we're done here.
A word of advice: stay in your little safe-space fagot corner next time you witness an argument--or you might seriously hurt yourself.
A word of advice: stay in your little safe-space fagot corner next time you witness an argument--or you might seriously hurt yourself.
#196 to #194
-
deaminzaints (11/05/2015) [-] might wanna wait for a response, not everyone has as much spare time to write as you
#200 to #196
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
Yes. I don't have to work because I can live off of my talent. Poor me! I must be so miserable to have so much free time for my friends, my girlfriend and myself.
#190 to #187
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
Actually, "do as I say not as I do" is the best response to a very known ad hominem fallacy, the "you can't speak on this subject because 'x' reason that pertains to you". It's the cheapest way for you to avoid addressing my actual points, and the cheapest way for me to avoid addressing your idiocy and intellectual laziness.
Intellect = learning. Maybe, but probably not. You still have to equate dying your hair with learning, though, you ******* retard. Intellectual development is training your brain to become better at learning, reasoning and retaining/using information. Thus, knowing that your shirt is grey is irrelevant to me and thus unimportant (importance being, of course, an important aspect of the content-oriented facet of intellectual development) and also I don't see how I would use that information to make my life better (making it even more worthless). It's intellectual development, yes. But it is worthless.
But I agree with you. I always should consider utter ******* imbeciles like you when I write my comments. Therefore I should have added the adjective "worthwhile" to my statement on intellectual development. Indeed, there is always someone who'll yell at you for not being precise enough (and that is the truest testimony to their stupidity on this planet).
Intellect = learning. Maybe, but probably not. You still have to equate dying your hair with learning, though, you ******* retard. Intellectual development is training your brain to become better at learning, reasoning and retaining/using information. Thus, knowing that your shirt is grey is irrelevant to me and thus unimportant (importance being, of course, an important aspect of the content-oriented facet of intellectual development) and also I don't see how I would use that information to make my life better (making it even more worthless). It's intellectual development, yes. But it is worthless.
But I agree with you. I always should consider utter ******* imbeciles like you when I write my comments. Therefore I should have added the adjective "worthwhile" to my statement on intellectual development. Indeed, there is always someone who'll yell at you for not being precise enough (and that is the truest testimony to their stupidity on this planet).
#195 to #190
-
deaminzaints (11/05/2015) [-] aaah the old "my dumb arguement is bette than yours so you are dumb!" arguement. classic idiot. i see your point, the issue with it is that your original comment was that you took issue with the girl who spends time dying her hair becourse she could spend that time learning. that arugment falls flat when you consider you are doing the exact thing you are shaming her for, namely wasting time instead of learning. my response "you cant speak" may often be used to silence people of differing opinion, but in this case i am simply asking you to adhere to your own advice, which of couse you dont want to so you answer with do as i say not as i do". see, its not much of a counter since you are confirming the problem with your original comment.
got all that? i bet not but ill try.
now, intellect = learning. i dont have to equate dying har to learning since dying hair is not an action which requires upkeep or focus, meaning you can do other things meanwhile as i said before. you could easily read a book while the hair dye is working. on the other hand, writing a comment on FJ is an action which requires focus meaning you wouldnt be able to learn other things meanwhile. see the trick?
now, i asked you specifically what you consider intellectual development becourse i knew you only considered somethings "worthwhile" which you said as well which is where the main point comes in: who the **** do you think you are, trying to tell others what is worth knowing or not? you are nothing but a random FJ user, no ekspert or authority on any subject, but still you think that only subjects that you deem "worthy" should be learned? the narccisism is strong.
what you consider "intellectual reading" may very well be considered absolute crap by others and no matter how much you try and argue that it is, you will have no authority on the subject since, as you have stated in this thread, you are just some 21 year old. same as me. no authority, just narccisism.
got all that? i bet not but ill try.
now, intellect = learning. i dont have to equate dying har to learning since dying hair is not an action which requires upkeep or focus, meaning you can do other things meanwhile as i said before. you could easily read a book while the hair dye is working. on the other hand, writing a comment on FJ is an action which requires focus meaning you wouldnt be able to learn other things meanwhile. see the trick?
now, i asked you specifically what you consider intellectual development becourse i knew you only considered somethings "worthwhile" which you said as well which is where the main point comes in: who the **** do you think you are, trying to tell others what is worth knowing or not? you are nothing but a random FJ user, no ekspert or authority on any subject, but still you think that only subjects that you deem "worthy" should be learned? the narccisism is strong.
what you consider "intellectual reading" may very well be considered absolute crap by others and no matter how much you try and argue that it is, you will have no authority on the subject since, as you have stated in this thread, you are just some 21 year old. same as me. no authority, just narccisism.
#198 to #195
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
"that arugment falls flat"
Why? Because I'm wasting my time? Nice assertion. Claims of hypocrisy are not a counter-argument.
"meaning you can do other things meanwhile as i said before."
Like being on FJ perhaps? Because that's what she seems like she's doing, you inbred. She has two useless things on her list, I only have one.
"meaning you wouldnt be able to learn other things meanwhile"
Unless I consider what I learn from utter retards like yourself to be useful. Which I do. I am a fiction writer and thus I need to spend a lot of time in analyzing what makes people tick--what gets them mad, happy, sad, what makes them act the way they do, etc.
"see the trick?"
I honestly don't suggest being smug until you've made at least one valid point.
"who the **** do you think you are,"
Here we go again. You're not attacking my point, you are using the retarded cop-out "Who are YOU to say that!?" Here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uYpwehCoYc
"but still you think that only subjects that you deem "worthy" should be learned?"
Your own bigotry made you project onto me and infer this. I was opening a discourse (which I did in fact succeed in doing since three discourses were had following my comment). It's now your turn to attack my points, instead of resorting to your sad fallacies.
"the narccisism is strong."
Always ask yourself the following question (this is a genuine word of advice): "Am I perhaps projecting on my opponent?"
" you will have no authority on the subject since, as you have stated in this thread, you are just some 21 year old"
Yet I am an already successful screenwriter. Thus, I am actually technically an authority on "reading" despite my young age. But even so, one is not required to be an authority on a subject to debate the subject. That's another fallacy: a variant of the argument from authority. You are going through ridiculous mental contortions in order to sustain your points. You should be able to realize how stupid you are by now, but that's only my opinion, of course. I am by no means an authority on stupidity as you seem very much so to be.
Why? Because I'm wasting my time? Nice assertion. Claims of hypocrisy are not a counter-argument.
"meaning you can do other things meanwhile as i said before."
Like being on FJ perhaps? Because that's what she seems like she's doing, you inbred. She has two useless things on her list, I only have one.
"meaning you wouldnt be able to learn other things meanwhile"
Unless I consider what I learn from utter retards like yourself to be useful. Which I do. I am a fiction writer and thus I need to spend a lot of time in analyzing what makes people tick--what gets them mad, happy, sad, what makes them act the way they do, etc.
"see the trick?"
I honestly don't suggest being smug until you've made at least one valid point.
"who the **** do you think you are,"
Here we go again. You're not attacking my point, you are using the retarded cop-out "Who are YOU to say that!?" Here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uYpwehCoYc
"but still you think that only subjects that you deem "worthy" should be learned?"
Your own bigotry made you project onto me and infer this. I was opening a discourse (which I did in fact succeed in doing since three discourses were had following my comment). It's now your turn to attack my points, instead of resorting to your sad fallacies.
"the narccisism is strong."
Always ask yourself the following question (this is a genuine word of advice): "Am I perhaps projecting on my opponent?"
" you will have no authority on the subject since, as you have stated in this thread, you are just some 21 year old"
Yet I am an already successful screenwriter. Thus, I am actually technically an authority on "reading" despite my young age. But even so, one is not required to be an authority on a subject to debate the subject. That's another fallacy: a variant of the argument from authority. You are going through ridiculous mental contortions in order to sustain your points. You should be able to realize how stupid you are by now, but that's only my opinion, of course. I am by no means an authority on stupidity as you seem very much so to be.
#252 to #198
-
deaminzaints (11/05/2015) [-] so i lost my first comment, so ill rush through this one.
-nice assertion
not an assertion, its observable.
-claims of hypocrisy
it is. it very much is.
-like being on FJ
assertion, nice work.
-She has two useless things on her list, I only have one.
not a competition, but still **** argument.
-i am a fiction writer
then you wont mind dumping a link to a dropbox or something with something you wrote and a timestamp right?
-analyzing
dumb fallacy, trying to validate your own waste of time to not hurt your image
-smug
holy **** the utter hypocrisy and self loving jerk off in this one. bet you came a little.
-not attacking my point
yes i absolutely am, the fact that you dont realise it, dosent change that.
-link
an artsy butthurt youtube video from some small channel with bad arguments does not validate your point in the slightest, in fact in points out the stupidity of it.
-project
no, you literally wrote it youself. "Therefore I should have added the adjective "worthwhile" to my statement on intellectual development"
-opening discourse
its only something you do on a subject thats controversial, not by making a wrong statement.
-sad fallacies
describing most of your comments
-ask yourself
another advice that you dont follow
-am i perhaps projecting on my opponent?
no. are you?
-successful screenwriter
proof or gtfo
-technically an authority on "reading"
as much as the guy who wrote the screenplay for human centipede or any person who went to college
-not required to be an authority on a subject to debate
true, but you did not debate. you simply told someone how to live their life. to do that, you need authority to show that you have what it takes to guide a person. thats how parenting works for eksample.
-ridiculous mental contortions
not really, what im saying is common sense. its the other way around.
and finally
-I am by no means an authority on stupidity
oh i would definitly say you are, the reason you disagree with me is that im not spouting stupidity like you. see how it works?
as for the: Yes. I don't have to work because I can live off of my talent. Poor me! I must be so miserable to have so much free time for my friends, my girlfriend and myself.
i dont care. i told you not everyone had time to write back instantly, i was in the middle of work. believing that you are correct simply becourse someone hasent responded within a fixed time is absolutely idiotic.
-nice assertion
not an assertion, its observable.
-claims of hypocrisy
it is. it very much is.
-like being on FJ
assertion, nice work.
-She has two useless things on her list, I only have one.
not a competition, but still **** argument.
-i am a fiction writer
then you wont mind dumping a link to a dropbox or something with something you wrote and a timestamp right?
-analyzing
dumb fallacy, trying to validate your own waste of time to not hurt your image
-smug
holy **** the utter hypocrisy and self loving jerk off in this one. bet you came a little.
-not attacking my point
yes i absolutely am, the fact that you dont realise it, dosent change that.
-link
an artsy butthurt youtube video from some small channel with bad arguments does not validate your point in the slightest, in fact in points out the stupidity of it.
-project
no, you literally wrote it youself. "Therefore I should have added the adjective "worthwhile" to my statement on intellectual development"
-opening discourse
its only something you do on a subject thats controversial, not by making a wrong statement.
-sad fallacies
describing most of your comments
-ask yourself
another advice that you dont follow
-am i perhaps projecting on my opponent?
no. are you?
-successful screenwriter
proof or gtfo
-technically an authority on "reading"
as much as the guy who wrote the screenplay for human centipede or any person who went to college
-not required to be an authority on a subject to debate
true, but you did not debate. you simply told someone how to live their life. to do that, you need authority to show that you have what it takes to guide a person. thats how parenting works for eksample.
-ridiculous mental contortions
not really, what im saying is common sense. its the other way around.
and finally
-I am by no means an authority on stupidity
oh i would definitly say you are, the reason you disagree with me is that im not spouting stupidity like you. see how it works?
as for the: Yes. I don't have to work because I can live off of my talent. Poor me! I must be so miserable to have so much free time for my friends, my girlfriend and myself.
i dont care. i told you not everyone had time to write back instantly, i was in the middle of work. believing that you are correct simply becourse someone hasent responded within a fixed time is absolutely idiotic.
#291 to #252
-
migueldecervantes (11/06/2015) [-]
You have no idea as to what an assertion is and you don't understand logic for **** . All you do is respond with "no, I'm not 'x'/'doing x', you are!" I think in all honesty that you are way too stupid to even be able to understand how stupid you are. I have lost the battle to repair your dysfunctional brain. Today is a sad day.
I'll let you think that you have made any one thing resembling a good point and forfeit. Have a good one, anyway.
I'll let you think that you have made any one thing resembling a good point and forfeit. Have a good one, anyway.
#310 to #291
-
deaminzaints (11/06/2015) [-] its like you are ironically trying to describe yourself. its pretty funny.
#169 to #168
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
It means not waste even that three hours every six months or so, and study some interesting subject or read a ******* book of classical literature (not that twilight ******** ) instead.
If you think that "intellectual development" is a nonissue, then that kind of proves my point, don't you think so?
If you think that "intellectual development" is a nonissue, then that kind of proves my point, don't you think so?
#228 to #169
-
enlightednatzie ONLINE (11/05/2015) [-] Hey joekerr! I found some cringe material for you!
#307 to #228
-
migueldecervantes (11/06/2015) [-]
In response to your last comment:
Well, that's great. I hope you'll be successful in all your future endeavors, then--professional and not. A career is one thing, but money isn't all that important. Relationships, community and, yes indeed, intellectual development are the most important aspects of one's life in the long run. This is an opinion, of course.
Have a good one, buddy.
Well, that's great. I hope you'll be successful in all your future endeavors, then--professional and not. A career is one thing, but money isn't all that important. Relationships, community and, yes indeed, intellectual development are the most important aspects of one's life in the long run. This is an opinion, of course.
Have a good one, buddy.
#292 to #228
-
migueldecervantes (11/06/2015) [-]
Me: "Intellectual development is good. I suggest you occupy your time with more useful stuff."
You: "Lol such cringy **** ! lol! who evan needs intelektul develloppement? also i do fap maraton lol. i like 2 fap 2 anime lol. i woek up at 13:00 lol."
Honestly, I can see your point. Between the two of us, I am much more cringe-worthy and autistic. You are the pinnacle of what a person can be.
xox don't cry babby. dry your tears. all is but lost moments like tears in the rain lol.
You: "Lol such cringy **** ! lol! who evan needs intelektul develloppement? also i do fap maraton lol. i like 2 fap 2 anime lol. i woek up at 13:00 lol."
Honestly, I can see your point. Between the two of us, I am much more cringe-worthy and autistic. You are the pinnacle of what a person can be.
xox don't cry babby. dry your tears. all is but lost moments like tears in the rain lol.
#294 to #292
-
enlightednatzie ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] Well, for starters, yeas i enjoy masturbation so what? How is that uncreative? I need to release the pressure of my semen in my prostata for medical reasons (cum buckets in my dreams) and i like to have fun in the process by you know, watching porn.
You see, i am a hardworking man (actually not because im unemployed and leech on welfare but w/e) and i have morals and obligations. And some of these morals and obligations are not to lie to myself and actually think that trash talk a m'lady online will reward me with sex with said m'lady. I can tell you that the chances of having sex with a woman are 0 if the first thing you do is saying that her hair is ugly. But thats not the point because you, just claimed that i, enlightednatsie faps to 2d.
Thats right, you just claimed that i drag my wieners foreskin back and fourth to girls that dont even exist and where probably drawn by some japanese creepy pedo who is 40 years old and lives with his mum. Kinda gay and pathetic and not even i, a permavirgin (i choose to be a virgin btw because i dont believe in sex before marriage) would sink that low.
I masturbate to REAL girls with REAL passions and dreams. If their passions and dreams are giving me a blowjob and piss all over my face that is (yes that is my fetish, problemo?)
You see, i am a hardworking man (actually not because im unemployed and leech on welfare but w/e) and i have morals and obligations. And some of these morals and obligations are not to lie to myself and actually think that trash talk a m'lady online will reward me with sex with said m'lady. I can tell you that the chances of having sex with a woman are 0 if the first thing you do is saying that her hair is ugly. But thats not the point because you, just claimed that i, enlightednatsie faps to 2d.
Thats right, you just claimed that i drag my wieners foreskin back and fourth to girls that dont even exist and where probably drawn by some japanese creepy pedo who is 40 years old and lives with his mum. Kinda gay and pathetic and not even i, a permavirgin (i choose to be a virgin btw because i dont believe in sex before marriage) would sink that low.
I masturbate to REAL girls with REAL passions and dreams. If their passions and dreams are giving me a blowjob and piss all over my face that is (yes that is my fetish, problemo?)
#295 to #294
-
migueldecervantes (11/06/2015) [-]
You are the cringiest person I have ever met on this site! I'll respond for kicks.
"i enjoy masturbation so what?"
My point was to compare your comments to mine as per their content. Yours are ******* retarded, mine are at least trying to make a point.
"How is that uncreative?"
Are you calling masturbation a "creative activity"? How ******* retarded are you, really? You are so pathetic that to help you sleep at night you come up with the saddest ego defense mechanisms I've ever seen in my life. You are so pitiful, it's cringe-worthy. I feel disgusting just for reading your response and knowing that a human being can sink that low.
"I'm a hard working man (actually not because...)" Jesus ******* Christ... The autism is very strong with you.
"im unemployed and leech on welfare but w/e" Really? I could have never guessed...
"And some of these morals and obligations are not to lie to myself and actually think that trash talk a m'lady online will reward me with sex with said m'lady."
You are projecting your typical ambitions onto mine, my autistic friend. Again, such objectives are cringe-worthy and you should be ashamed of yourself. Plus, trash talk =/= give an opinion. If you scroll down (or up, I'm not sure) you can see that we finished the conversation in amicable ways.
"I can tell you that the chances of having sex with a woman are 0 if the first thing you do is saying that her hair is ugly."
I have a fiancee and I have been with her for three years already. I am not trying to have sex with anyone else. Trust me, to make such claims tells me more about yourself than you'd want to and just makes you appear more and more autistic.
"you, just claimed that i, enlightednatsie faps to 2d."
Well, don't you?
"you just claimed that i drag my wieners foreskin back and fourth to girls that dont even exist and where probably drawn by some japanese creepy pedo who is 40 years old and lives with his mum."
I... You have a very liberal understanding of the term "claimed", my friend. I don't even know where to start describing the stupidity of what you just said.
"a permavirgin"
I gasped at this one, since it was extremely surprising reveal. I would have never guessed.
"(i choose to be a virgin btw because i dont believe in sex before marriage)"
But of course. It's all by choice, not because you are autistic, fat, ugly and recluse.
"would sink that low." You've already reached the bottom of the barrel, I think. It would be impossible for you to sink lower. You've just made yourself believe that my highs are actually somehow lower than your pathetic lows. It's an interesting mental contortion to flip over the spectrum of values and worth so much. Of course and yet again, this only makes you appear even more sad and pathetic.
"I masturbate to REAL girls with REAL passions and dreams." You're trolling, and I respect that, but you still could make an effort to at least make one valid point just to bring a little suspense into the whole thing. This conversation has been rather boring so far.
" If their passions and dreams are giving me a blowjob and piss all over my face that is (yes that is my fetish, problemo?)" I admit that that was pretty funny. Do you just go around this site pretending to be autistic and cringey? If it is so (I seriously hope it's the case), then I don't think that's very useful either. I, at least, learn something from going on this site.
"i enjoy masturbation so what?"
My point was to compare your comments to mine as per their content. Yours are ******* retarded, mine are at least trying to make a point.
"How is that uncreative?"
Are you calling masturbation a "creative activity"? How ******* retarded are you, really? You are so pathetic that to help you sleep at night you come up with the saddest ego defense mechanisms I've ever seen in my life. You are so pitiful, it's cringe-worthy. I feel disgusting just for reading your response and knowing that a human being can sink that low.
"I'm a hard working man (actually not because...)" Jesus ******* Christ... The autism is very strong with you.
"im unemployed and leech on welfare but w/e" Really? I could have never guessed...
"And some of these morals and obligations are not to lie to myself and actually think that trash talk a m'lady online will reward me with sex with said m'lady."
You are projecting your typical ambitions onto mine, my autistic friend. Again, such objectives are cringe-worthy and you should be ashamed of yourself. Plus, trash talk =/= give an opinion. If you scroll down (or up, I'm not sure) you can see that we finished the conversation in amicable ways.
"I can tell you that the chances of having sex with a woman are 0 if the first thing you do is saying that her hair is ugly."
I have a fiancee and I have been with her for three years already. I am not trying to have sex with anyone else. Trust me, to make such claims tells me more about yourself than you'd want to and just makes you appear more and more autistic.
"you, just claimed that i, enlightednatsie faps to 2d."
Well, don't you?
"you just claimed that i drag my wieners foreskin back and fourth to girls that dont even exist and where probably drawn by some japanese creepy pedo who is 40 years old and lives with his mum."
I... You have a very liberal understanding of the term "claimed", my friend. I don't even know where to start describing the stupidity of what you just said.
"a permavirgin"
I gasped at this one, since it was extremely surprising reveal. I would have never guessed.
"(i choose to be a virgin btw because i dont believe in sex before marriage)"
But of course. It's all by choice, not because you are autistic, fat, ugly and recluse.
"would sink that low." You've already reached the bottom of the barrel, I think. It would be impossible for you to sink lower. You've just made yourself believe that my highs are actually somehow lower than your pathetic lows. It's an interesting mental contortion to flip over the spectrum of values and worth so much. Of course and yet again, this only makes you appear even more sad and pathetic.
"I masturbate to REAL girls with REAL passions and dreams." You're trolling, and I respect that, but you still could make an effort to at least make one valid point just to bring a little suspense into the whole thing. This conversation has been rather boring so far.
" If their passions and dreams are giving me a blowjob and piss all over my face that is (yes that is my fetish, problemo?)" I admit that that was pretty funny. Do you just go around this site pretending to be autistic and cringey? If it is so (I seriously hope it's the case), then I don't think that's very useful either. I, at least, learn something from going on this site.
#296 to #295
-
enlightednatzie ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] Dont you have anything better to do? You're claiming that you arent as a virgin as me but you're still defending your arguments to the ver last bit. I was making fun of you because you gave your expertise opinion on someones hair color and couldnt grasp the fact that you where absoluetly wrong.
#297 to #296
-
migueldecervantes (11/06/2015) [-]
"Dont you have anything better to do?"
Let me quote myself again: "I, at least, learn something from going on this site." I like arguing. I call these 'experiments on human behavior' and I specialize in utter retards like you.
"You're claiming that you arent as a virgin as me but you're still defending your arguments to the ver last bit."
Virgin = defending claims well. Good job, buddy.
"I was making fun of you because you gave your expertise opinion on someones hair color"
And I'm making fun of you for being a virgin, beta, cringey, autistic, fat, ugly, retarded neckbeard.
"couldnt grasp the fact that you where absoluetly wrong."
And yet you still haven't made one argument I couldn't rebut. You are a virgin idiot because you make claims that you cannot support and think yourself to be right (and also because you are too ugly and pathetic to succeed in having sex).
Wouldn't you just want to buy an escape from your crippling virginity by paying for a prostitute? Seriously, I would at this point suggest you do that. There's a reason prostitution exists, you know. You are this ******* reason.
Let me quote myself again: "I, at least, learn something from going on this site." I like arguing. I call these 'experiments on human behavior' and I specialize in utter retards like you.
"You're claiming that you arent as a virgin as me but you're still defending your arguments to the ver last bit."
Virgin = defending claims well. Good job, buddy.
"I was making fun of you because you gave your expertise opinion on someones hair color"
And I'm making fun of you for being a virgin, beta, cringey, autistic, fat, ugly, retarded neckbeard.
"couldnt grasp the fact that you where absoluetly wrong."
And yet you still haven't made one argument I couldn't rebut. You are a virgin idiot because you make claims that you cannot support and think yourself to be right (and also because you are too ugly and pathetic to succeed in having sex).
Wouldn't you just want to buy an escape from your crippling virginity by paying for a prostitute? Seriously, I would at this point suggest you do that. There's a reason prostitution exists, you know. You are this ******* reason.
#298 to #297
-
enlightednatzie ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] ''escape from your crippling virginity by paying for a prostitute?''
Lmao, is that how you got your fiancee? Just kidding holmes.
You see, i dedicated this account to make cringey neckbeard comments but you see, you hae outcringed me. Now i have also learned something from this site, the cringiest ones arent the neckbeard losers, its the once with a girlfriend pretending to be much better and smarter than everyone, only because they have a girlfriend. Your the one in the last category friendo.
Lmao, is that how you got your fiancee? Just kidding holmes.
You see, i dedicated this account to make cringey neckbeard comments but you see, you hae outcringed me. Now i have also learned something from this site, the cringiest ones arent the neckbeard losers, its the once with a girlfriend pretending to be much better and smarter than everyone, only because they have a girlfriend. Your the one in the last category friendo.
#299 to #298
-
migueldecervantes (11/06/2015) [-]
My category: 1) have gf, job with great income, friends 2) lonely virgin fagot who is also unemployed considers me cringey.
Your category: 1) onely virgin fagot who is also unemployed, 2) obviously is going to kill himself very soon.
You know what? I'm okay with that, surprisingly enough. And, buddy, let's let society decide who is the cringiest, okay?
Your category: 1) onely virgin fagot who is also unemployed, 2) obviously is going to kill himself very soon.
You know what? I'm okay with that, surprisingly enough. And, buddy, let's let society decide who is the cringiest, okay?
#300 to #299
-
enlightednatzie ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] You are obviusly. Who here work his ass of 8 hours a day just so he can pay taxes to people like me? Thats are some valueble 8 hours i could spend on achieving my life goals, masturbating in my dads basement.
#301 to #300
-
migueldecervantes (11/06/2015) [-]
I'm only 21 and I'm already working as an editor for spec scripts in L.A. My latest screenplay was finalist in the 2015 Scriptapalooza Competition and has won a prize (which I will not disclose here) in the North Platte Screenwriting Competition.
I am rich and successful. You are a pathetic leech. Please, reconsider the pathetic excuse you call your life.
I am rich and successful. You are a pathetic leech. Please, reconsider the pathetic excuse you call your life.
#302 to #301
-
enlightednatzie ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] So you're writing a bunch of boring ass scripts? You might not be so rich and succesful if you are debating these kind of things with a ''a virgin loser who should kill himself'' as you you just me, who infact should not kill myself btw.
#303 to #302
-
migueldecervantes (11/06/2015) [-]
I would say my scripts are pretty entertaining and rich/deep in content if they're winning the most important competitions in the country that is specialized in entertainment and culture.
And, please, I'm getting tired of repeating myself: I like debating! This is not something that takes away from who I am. I get a kick out of this. It's fun. Alright?
Of course you shouldn't actually kill yourself. No one should. But you ought to reconsider your life and strive to make it better. Leeching off on hardworking people is not smart, as you might think it is. You're not being a clever man, the trickster of the tales of yore. You are but someone we pity as a community and decide to make your life better without asking you to work. You would have never been able to do that any time before the 90s.
I'm sure you have something to contribute to society. Don't you want to do so? Don't you want to make the world better for others? You may think my scripts are bad and boring, but some other people rather enjoy them. And it gives me pleasure to know that I did something good. Plus, the fact that you make money out of your personal projects is a pretty nice thing too.
I just don't understand why you have such a lifestyle. It's unhealthy in various ways and I'm sure you know that. You can't rationalize your choices forever.
And, please, I'm getting tired of repeating myself: I like debating! This is not something that takes away from who I am. I get a kick out of this. It's fun. Alright?
Of course you shouldn't actually kill yourself. No one should. But you ought to reconsider your life and strive to make it better. Leeching off on hardworking people is not smart, as you might think it is. You're not being a clever man, the trickster of the tales of yore. You are but someone we pity as a community and decide to make your life better without asking you to work. You would have never been able to do that any time before the 90s.
I'm sure you have something to contribute to society. Don't you want to do so? Don't you want to make the world better for others? You may think my scripts are bad and boring, but some other people rather enjoy them. And it gives me pleasure to know that I did something good. Plus, the fact that you make money out of your personal projects is a pretty nice thing too.
I just don't understand why you have such a lifestyle. It's unhealthy in various ways and I'm sure you know that. You can't rationalize your choices forever.
#304 to #303
-
enlightednatzie ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] Jut kidding fam, i am studying but i recieve welfare in the process. The reason i dont work is because its hard to find a stable job without any sort of highschool diplopma. The only jobs i had before that was these hour contract which meant that i could get a phone call the day before i had to work and the other place only had summerjobs availible. That was the things that made me depressed because i was still practically unemployed the most time and i couldnt plan anything ahead. The reason i started to study again.
#306 to #305
-
enlightednatzie ONLINE (11/06/2015) [-] Electrician, really hard, so i failed during highschool. ow that i know how it feels to be unemployed i started studying again.
#170 to #169
-
kikisu (11/05/2015) [-] I read plenty other than Twilight, its garbage about an abusive relationship. I enjoy sci-fi and fantasy. I play D&D and Stars without Numbers. I game. I do what I want when I feel like it. I also work, and am in the field of chemical engineering I don't have that degree yet but that's what my career path at my job entails . Classical literature isn't even THAT important in grand scale of things. I think its a nonissue because I do that kinda stuff for fun most of the time and don't feel the need to class it as such just to see like a pompous, patronizing asshat.
#171 to #170
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
It is sad that most young people cannot understand the importance of literature. I guess it comes with wisdom as most good things do.
#172 to #171
-
kikisu (11/05/2015) [-] There it comes, the "this generation is so awful" comment. Its sad old ***** can't realize that being disinterested in something doesn't end the world. I don't need literature for a job dealing with chemicals. I need math, science, etc. I have many hobbies that don't include that. I also recognize that someone else likes ancient literature but dislikes what I do as a career. We need specialization to function as a society.
#173 to #172
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
That would be tantamount to saying that we don't need to specialize, as a community, in the important subjects of morality, science and culture.
Specialization is important in a professional field, not in everything else that is part of your life (i.e: spirituality, community, love, happiness, wisdom, better understanding of life, better understanding of nature and science, etc., etc.).
I'm twenty one years old; hardly someone you would call an "old **** ". You are getting angry, but that's not exactly unexpected from someone with blue-hair. I wouldn't say I'm bigoted, yet you are confirming by biases. Before, you go all *************************** on me: yes, I'm joking.
Specialization is important in a professional field, not in everything else that is part of your life (i.e: spirituality, community, love, happiness, wisdom, better understanding of life, better understanding of nature and science, etc., etc.).
I'm twenty one years old; hardly someone you would call an "old **** ". You are getting angry, but that's not exactly unexpected from someone with blue-hair. I wouldn't say I'm bigoted, yet you are confirming by biases. Before, you go all *************************** on me: yes, I'm joking.
#176 to #173
-
goldenglimmer ONLINE (11/05/2015) [-] See, here's the thing: intellect is great. Stimulating your mind through reading, writing, reflecting or other activities that develop your cognitive abilities is good stuff.
But make no mistake: you don't have intellect. You're what's called an intellectual; a snobby, narrow-minded asshole who asserts his superiority by bashing those who don't conform to his infinitesimally dim perception of what it means to be intellectual.
Guess what you brain damaged ******* , chastising people for spending some leisure time doing what they enjoy (which by the way is actually beneficial for one's mental health and thus increases your capacity to learn) is just being a dick. Nobody here thinks you're smart, intelligent or any other arbitrary synonym of having depth or substance, you're just coming across as a dick.
But make no mistake: you don't have intellect. You're what's called an intellectual; a snobby, narrow-minded asshole who asserts his superiority by bashing those who don't conform to his infinitesimally dim perception of what it means to be intellectual.
Guess what you brain damaged ******* , chastising people for spending some leisure time doing what they enjoy (which by the way is actually beneficial for one's mental health and thus increases your capacity to learn) is just being a dick. Nobody here thinks you're smart, intelligent or any other arbitrary synonym of having depth or substance, you're just coming across as a dick.
#178 to #176
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
>intellect is great
>you don't have intellect
>you're an intellectual
>snobby, narrow-minded (now that's just silly)
I'll let the rest of this site be the judge of how utterly retarded you are. It's time to stop commenting, friend.
>you don't have intellect
>you're an intellectual
>snobby, narrow-minded (now that's just silly)
I'll let the rest of this site be the judge of how utterly retarded you are. It's time to stop commenting, friend.
#180 to #178
-
goldenglimmer ONLINE (11/05/2015) [-] I'm guessing my disassociating the word 'intellect' from the term 'intellectual' is what's confusing you.
Let me clear that up.
Intellect: the sum of one's cognitive capabilities; the ability to connect, relate and associate knowledge and information and construct meaningful ideas and concepts based on what you know. One's ability to reflect and deduce, and the capacity one has to handle complexity and nuance.
Intellectual: an esteemed individual who contributes to the open discourse... OR: one who adheres to intellectualism; an elitist, snide group of sophists whose intellect is spent on forwarding agendas, be it political or personal, in the guise of being genuine.
And yes, you are coming across as snobby and narrow-minded. Read your own comments, Jesus Christ.
Let me clear that up.
Intellect: the sum of one's cognitive capabilities; the ability to connect, relate and associate knowledge and information and construct meaningful ideas and concepts based on what you know. One's ability to reflect and deduce, and the capacity one has to handle complexity and nuance.
Intellectual: an esteemed individual who contributes to the open discourse... OR: one who adheres to intellectualism; an elitist, snide group of sophists whose intellect is spent on forwarding agendas, be it political or personal, in the guise of being genuine.
And yes, you are coming across as snobby and narrow-minded. Read your own comments, Jesus Christ.
#181 to #180
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
If I'm "coming across" as snobby and narrow-minded in my comments, wouldn't it be your fault for not being charitable enough towards what good my points could contain (and thus being close-minded yourself).
I mean, look at us: here I am, expressing my opinions and criticisms--genuine criticism, I should add, about how I, myself, in the humblest of humbler opinions,believe that a person might ought to consider spending their time a tad more productively.
And here you are, my friend: attacking me with nothing but ad hominem fallacies which have nothing to do with the point I was making, and even going the incredible distance of claiming that "nobody here thinks you're smart" (I'm shocked--shocked!)
I can't help but notice how you interjected (very subtly so) your own idiotic value judgments into a neutral definition of intellectualism. You are a sophist at their finest. You are an idiot; a buffoon, a lowly jester believing themselves an oracle or some sort of just protector/sage philosopher.
<3 babby don't cry
I mean, look at us: here I am, expressing my opinions and criticisms--genuine criticism, I should add, about how I, myself, in the humblest of humbler opinions,believe that a person might ought to consider spending their time a tad more productively.
And here you are, my friend: attacking me with nothing but ad hominem fallacies which have nothing to do with the point I was making, and even going the incredible distance of claiming that "nobody here thinks you're smart" (I'm shocked--shocked!)
I can't help but notice how you interjected (very subtly so) your own idiotic value judgments into a neutral definition of intellectualism. You are a sophist at their finest. You are an idiot; a buffoon, a lowly jester believing themselves an oracle or some sort of just protector/sage philosopher.
<3 babby don't cry
#191 to #181
-
goldenglimmer ONLINE (11/05/2015) [-] 1. No, obviously not. You set the premises of the discussion with your condescending commentary in the first place, and those premises conflict with any respectable form of discourse. My following the premises you set and calling out your sad, pseudo-intellectual display is not close-minded.
2. Sure, you gave your opinions, which were passive aggressive and speculative, and frankly, completely unfounded. I find it astonishing that your arrogance runs so deep that you could think for a single second that anything you said could be considered humble (in fact, I actually chuckled a little as a I read it) - the doctor needs to prescribe you a large dose of dictionary, I suspect.
3. Damn right it's ad hominem - it was from the very start. Ad hominem is a rhetorical technique used to divert the attention away from an argument and instead to the person presenting said argument... see, the thing is, you're implying you had an argument, but it wasn't. It was condescending spew, and I called you out for it.
4. Oh did I? I assure you, my definition of 'intellectualism' isn't my own. It stems from modern political and philosophical philosophers like G.K. Chesterton. Admittedly, I'm not him, so my phrasing was probably a lot less elegant, but your point is still rendered, well, quite moot.
I view myself as a flawed, small human being. I have no delusions of what I am, and I accept that I'm not perfect (at least to the degree one ever can). I try to be humble; sometimes I'm not. That's just how I roll.
P.S: I can read, too! If you think calling someone "completely retarded" at the end of a discourse (ref: comment 175) can be considered humble or reminiscent of anything like an opinion, you are so tragically mistaken.
Oh,and don't you worry. It will take more than empty rhetoric from a pseudo-intellectual to tug at my tear ducts, lol.
2. Sure, you gave your opinions, which were passive aggressive and speculative, and frankly, completely unfounded. I find it astonishing that your arrogance runs so deep that you could think for a single second that anything you said could be considered humble (in fact, I actually chuckled a little as a I read it) - the doctor needs to prescribe you a large dose of dictionary, I suspect.
3. Damn right it's ad hominem - it was from the very start. Ad hominem is a rhetorical technique used to divert the attention away from an argument and instead to the person presenting said argument... see, the thing is, you're implying you had an argument, but it wasn't. It was condescending spew, and I called you out for it.
4. Oh did I? I assure you, my definition of 'intellectualism' isn't my own. It stems from modern political and philosophical philosophers like G.K. Chesterton. Admittedly, I'm not him, so my phrasing was probably a lot less elegant, but your point is still rendered, well, quite moot.
I view myself as a flawed, small human being. I have no delusions of what I am, and I accept that I'm not perfect (at least to the degree one ever can). I try to be humble; sometimes I'm not. That's just how I roll.
P.S: I can read, too! If you think calling someone "completely retarded" at the end of a discourse (ref: comment 175) can be considered humble or reminiscent of anything like an opinion, you are so tragically mistaken.
Oh,and don't you worry. It will take more than empty rhetoric from a pseudo-intellectual to tug at my tear ducts, lol.
#193 to #191
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
"You set the premises of the discussion with your condescending commentary in the first place, and those premises conflict with any respectable form of discourse."
That's a very big judgment little babby is making. Don't forget how utterly subjective and reactionary your perception of this is. But anyway: if they conflict with any respectable form of discourse, we wouldn't be discussing it right now, you retard. Also, please read this, since you really didn't get the point I was making: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity
"My following the premises you set and calling out your sad, pseudo-intellectual display is not close-minded."
No, it's uselessly reactive and vacuous.
"Sure, you gave your opinions, which were passive aggressive and speculative, and frankly, completely unfounded."
Wait. How is my first comment unfounded? My argument goes this way: she does useless stuff; useless stuff has less worth than useful stuff; ergo, she should be doing useful stuff. Please, elaborate on how it is unfounded.
"I find it astonishing [...] could be considered humble (in fact, I actually chuckled a little as a I read it) - the doctor needs to prescribe you a large dose of dictionary, I suspect."
That... Yeah... That was the joke. Are you autistic, by any chance?
"Damn right it's ad hominem--"
Well, I guess that's it, huh? You just admitted to being a sophist. Oh, wait... Let's keep reading.
"see, the thing is, you're implying you had an argument, but it wasn't."
Yes, it was. If you do not consider it an argument, you are not being charitable (refer to the link I gave you). You are now strawmaning my position into oblivion, and that's not very nice of you. I am very disappointed in you, goldenglimmer9000xox; very disappointed indeed.
"my definition of 'intellectualism' isn't my own"
So? It's still biased and utterly non-neutral. It could have been your mom or any other great philosopher who had defined it in their own personal bigoted way, it wouldn't change the fact that it isn't the objective definition. You are an idiot.
That's a very big judgment little babby is making. Don't forget how utterly subjective and reactionary your perception of this is. But anyway: if they conflict with any respectable form of discourse, we wouldn't be discussing it right now, you retard. Also, please read this, since you really didn't get the point I was making: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity
"My following the premises you set and calling out your sad, pseudo-intellectual display is not close-minded."
No, it's uselessly reactive and vacuous.
"Sure, you gave your opinions, which were passive aggressive and speculative, and frankly, completely unfounded."
Wait. How is my first comment unfounded? My argument goes this way: she does useless stuff; useless stuff has less worth than useful stuff; ergo, she should be doing useful stuff. Please, elaborate on how it is unfounded.
"I find it astonishing [...] could be considered humble (in fact, I actually chuckled a little as a I read it) - the doctor needs to prescribe you a large dose of dictionary, I suspect."
That... Yeah... That was the joke. Are you autistic, by any chance?
"Damn right it's ad hominem--"
Well, I guess that's it, huh? You just admitted to being a sophist. Oh, wait... Let's keep reading.
"see, the thing is, you're implying you had an argument, but it wasn't."
Yes, it was. If you do not consider it an argument, you are not being charitable (refer to the link I gave you). You are now strawmaning my position into oblivion, and that's not very nice of you. I am very disappointed in you, goldenglimmer9000xox; very disappointed indeed.
"my definition of 'intellectualism' isn't my own"
So? It's still biased and utterly non-neutral. It could have been your mom or any other great philosopher who had defined it in their own personal bigoted way, it wouldn't change the fact that it isn't the objective definition. You are an idiot.
#175 to #174
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
You're not very fluent with English expressions, I see; I never said you were a feminist.
I didn't mean to imply I was intellectually superior. I think everyone is worthwhile even you (yes, that is, indeed, another ******* joke) I like to offer criticism, even though it's virtually impossible to change someone's opinion--not in real life, and much, much less on the internet. So maybe I'm the stupid one after all for criticizing someone close-minded and completely retarded in the first place...
Okay, but in all seriousness, it's all opinion. Take it for what it is, which is almost nothing on this site.
I didn't mean to imply I was intellectually superior. I think everyone is worthwhile even you (yes, that is, indeed, another ******* joke) I like to offer criticism, even though it's virtually impossible to change someone's opinion--not in real life, and much, much less on the internet. So maybe I'm the stupid one after all for criticizing someone close-minded and completely retarded in the first place...
Okay, but in all seriousness, it's all opinion. Take it for what it is, which is almost nothing on this site.
#179 to #177
-
migueldecervantes (11/05/2015) [-]
Oh, I know. You don't seem like that bitchy kind of person. It was fun kind of while it lasted.
Have a good one, sis.
Have a good one, sis.
#62 to #61
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] you wouldn't if you were totally happy with you natural colour which I'm assuming is a light, nutty brunette that can even be dark blonde in summer months.
#117 to #116
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] My point is that if you are totally happy, you cannot be happier. No need for insults. I'm sure the lady doesn't need defending by true heroes such as yourself. She seems to be doing a fine job on her own.
#120 to #119
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] Well then I made my point in the first sentence of my reply.
#235 to #123
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] Probably not. But I'm getting *********** with thumbs for what I think to be genuine logic (even if I did go about it in a dick manner). If my mother decided to one day dye her hair pink I would ask her what on Earth she is thinking and what has set it off. It's a conscious display of something. The simple "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" type thinking. If you think nothing is wrong with you and you love everything about your body, why change it? That's all.
But this is the most red thumbs I have ever received so I'm kinda happy for that.
Thanks for actually talking and I hope you kinda understand where I'm coming from.
But this is the most red thumbs I have ever received so I'm kinda happy for that.
Thanks for actually talking and I hope you kinda understand where I'm coming from.
#75 to #64
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] way to defend her honour, price charming
you earned your hero points for the day
i'll be sure to send your knighthood and perpetual virginity certificate in the post
you earned your hero points for the day
i'll be sure to send your knighthood and perpetual virginity certificate in the post
#239 to #162
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] I want people to acknowledge what they really are
that is the root of all this SJW ********
if this girl happened to be a little heavier she would be the kind of "gender is a social construct" pseudo feminist that we all hate
it just so happens that shes a little prettier than your average so she doesn't need to resort to such
she posts multiple pictures of herself with different hair colours and needlessly brags about weight loss that nobody asked about to get her kicks
she knows this site is full of guys that worship average looking girls
im trying to do you all a favour here
this is why girls act like psychos because half the betas that thumb me down will blow smoke up her ass because she has a pair of boobs and a cute face
girls need to hear the truth and be brought to reality. and some advice for the virgins in the room - the guy that tells girls this kinda stuff gets laid in this day and age. so thumb me down all you want, just don't complain when the SJW transcends fatties and the slightly hotter ones start getting involved. Its started already.
that is the root of all this SJW ********
if this girl happened to be a little heavier she would be the kind of "gender is a social construct" pseudo feminist that we all hate
it just so happens that shes a little prettier than your average so she doesn't need to resort to such
she posts multiple pictures of herself with different hair colours and needlessly brags about weight loss that nobody asked about to get her kicks
she knows this site is full of guys that worship average looking girls
im trying to do you all a favour here
this is why girls act like psychos because half the betas that thumb me down will blow smoke up her ass because she has a pair of boobs and a cute face
girls need to hear the truth and be brought to reality. and some advice for the virgins in the room - the guy that tells girls this kinda stuff gets laid in this day and age. so thumb me down all you want, just don't complain when the SJW transcends fatties and the slightly hotter ones start getting involved. Its started already.
#76 to #75
-
mangostormlegend (11/05/2015) [-] I don't question why your parents never loved you.
So why are you questioning why she likes to dye her hair?
So why are you questioning why she likes to dye her hair?
#77 to #76
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] yeah, good one; I'm sure the beta brigade would be proud.
Have a thumb. Probably the only digital action you'll get all year.
Have a thumb. Probably the only digital action you'll get all year.
#125 to #77
-
mcderfenschmirt (11/05/2015) [-] I bet all of your outfits in your closet look the exact same because you're content with your look. Or do you enjoy mixing it up every once in awhile like a normal person? Changing your hair color or getting your hair cut even is no different from wearing different clothes or something, bro.
#67 to #63
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] I guess I have to accept your reasoning even if i dont believe it. Also, t-shirts are changed for the sake of hygiene so that doesn't make sense really.
i'm just trying to say that you're nice enough naturally to not have to resort to dying your hair "crazy colours".
but nobody seems to be happy with the way they were born these days.
i'm just trying to say that you're nice enough naturally to not have to resort to dying your hair "crazy colours".
but nobody seems to be happy with the way they were born these days.
#100 to #86
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] i meant "nice" based on your physical appearance only
adding variety in your life (for the benefit of yourself) would be taking a new route to work or starting to go skydiving once a week
what youre doing is intentionally evoking new reactions from anybody that knows you. By changing your hair colour, you know you're more than likely to be the topic of conversation for at least a short while with anybody that saw our hair before the change. Also, blue is a colour outlandish enough to even gain reactions (even if they're small glances) from strangers that pass you by.
So yes, you have variation, but ultimately you fall victim to what you desire most - attention. You want the validation even at the cost of your true identity. You get it, the novelty wears off, then you dye it again.
Listen, I have no problem with it. It looks nice. You're cute as hell. I'm just making sure you and anyone else that dyes their hair to a colour usually seen in the rainbow knows whats up.
Everybody seeks validation from something or something for some reason in some way or another. We just have to be aware of it.
adding variety in your life (for the benefit of yourself) would be taking a new route to work or starting to go skydiving once a week
what youre doing is intentionally evoking new reactions from anybody that knows you. By changing your hair colour, you know you're more than likely to be the topic of conversation for at least a short while with anybody that saw our hair before the change. Also, blue is a colour outlandish enough to even gain reactions (even if they're small glances) from strangers that pass you by.
So yes, you have variation, but ultimately you fall victim to what you desire most - attention. You want the validation even at the cost of your true identity. You get it, the novelty wears off, then you dye it again.
Listen, I have no problem with it. It looks nice. You're cute as hell. I'm just making sure you and anyone else that dyes their hair to a colour usually seen in the rainbow knows whats up.
Everybody seeks validation from something or something for some reason in some way or another. We just have to be aware of it.
#108 to #100
-
kikisu (11/05/2015) [-] You seriously think skydiving, something that could result in my death, is better than changing my hair? No. I don't change my hair because of any attention seeking. I dye it when it fades, not when the attention I get does. I don't like attention, hell most of the time I sit in my house and browse funnyjunk or play vidya. Seriously, you aren't doing me any favor by "enlightening me" to my "attention whore" ways. I don't agree with you. I wear outfits that are tight, that show off my ass to get attention. I dye my hair because I like dying my hair.
#114 to #108
-
gingershavetrolls (11/05/2015) [-] I used travelling to work and skydiving as two opposite extremes at either end of the spectrum of things you can do that bring variation and affect nobody other than yourself - without acting in ways which I believe to be attention seeking. I am not suggesting that you jump out of a plane. You've already posted at least 3 different colours on this thread - you want to exhibit your "variation" for the sake of approval (or ego boost at the very least) of the sad cases that are thumbing me down. I'm not saying that you give a **** about me or any of these people. You desire the boost. The little kick you get when somebody notices how you look; your efforts aren't in vain. This is all perfectly fine. I am an ego maniac myself.
To be honest, I struggle with the the concept of somebody who is supposedly happy with their appearance but at the same time seeks to alter it. I have no piercings or tattoos and keep my natural hair colour because I'm pretty happy with how I look. I feel that any of the above would ruin what I was blessed with.
In truth, I still don't believe you but I can see that you're sticking to your guns. I admire that. I just don't really understand the whole piercing/tattoo/hair dying thing or why anybody would do sometimes irreversible things to their body for the sake of appearance. But maybe I'll never understand.
Now that said, I think there's a bigger issue at hand here... You got ass?
To be honest, I struggle with the the concept of somebody who is supposedly happy with their appearance but at the same time seeks to alter it. I have no piercings or tattoos and keep my natural hair colour because I'm pretty happy with how I look. I feel that any of the above would ruin what I was blessed with.
In truth, I still don't believe you but I can see that you're sticking to your guns. I admire that. I just don't really understand the whole piercing/tattoo/hair dying thing or why anybody would do sometimes irreversible things to their body for the sake of appearance. But maybe I'll never understand.
Now that said, I think there's a bigger issue at hand here... You got ass?
#113 to #101
-
JonathanNowFuckYou (11/05/2015) [-] fuk u fgt shes a grill on the innertet an she can notice me and do whatevr she lykes yur fukken virgen
#43 to #13
-
epicextreme (11/04/2015) [-] I recently discovered that I love girls with blue hair. don't know why but I've recently seen it a lot
but alas they are few and far between
but alas they are few and far between
#205 to #43
-
forallthelulzz (11/05/2015) [-] Some chick's can really pull it off. This was the first girl i ever met with blue hair that i thought looked good with it.
#33 to #15
-
danniegurl (11/04/2015) [-] I have those glasses, but I got them right before 9th grade, when they were the emo/scene thing.
#24 to #21
-
kikisu (11/04/2015) [-] They cover as much of my face as some safety glasses my job gives out, plus they are a special type of plastic that doesn't shatter, so if I got hit in the face they're not going to spray shards of glass into my eyes. Plus I have little side shields they came with that attach to the arms to keep stuff out from the sides. They're in line with OSHA occupational safety and health association regulations.
#26 to #24
-
motherfuckingkenji (11/04/2015) [-] In what kind of factory do you work where you have to worry about getting hit in the face? Doesn't sound like a good place to work. At least it pays well, right?
#27 to #26
-
kikisu (11/04/2015) [-] I work in a caulk and spackle factory as a machine operator. Parts could break, something could drop. I know those glasses have saved my eyes from material sprays dozens of times. It starts at $10 and goes up the longer you work. But the whole getting hit in the face thing is a precaution, and its required by law.
#28 to #27
-
motherfuckingkenji (11/04/2015) [-] Sounds like ******** . I work at a gas station making/delivering pizzas and even I make $10/hr. My safety equipment consists of disposable gloves and an apron.
Though I did cut my finger open once while wiping the pizza-cutting blade and had to go to the hospital, which was pointless since all it ended up needing was a band-aid despite the doctor saying stitches were probably better. But hey, at least I didn't need to pay for that because workmen's comp.
Though I did cut my finger open once while wiping the pizza-cutting blade and had to go to the hospital, which was pointless since all it ended up needing was a band-aid despite the doctor saying stitches were probably better. But hey, at least I didn't need to pay for that because workmen's comp.
#22 to #20
-
wdforty (11/04/2015) [-]
..at least half is something, eh. I actually don't have insurance myself hospital and general health related stuff is mostly free, like surgery, or GP. Malta-fag here, swell with corruption, obesity, and relatively pleasant people but we have to buy **** like glasses ourselves, unless you have insurance I guess
