Two types of nerds. . MAY' THE FORCE BE-'' siir I f -EQUAL TO MASS TIMES ACCELERATION. Two types of nerds MAY' THE FORCE BE-'' siir I f -EQUAL TO MASS TIMES ACCELERATION
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (52)
[ 52 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - robertelee
Reply +125 123456789123345869
(07/26/2014) [-]
User avatar #7 to #1 - bertyhell
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
my brain captioned this image by itself :s
#18 to #7 - shatt
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
thats the point
User avatar #37 to #18 - rongkong
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
**rongkong rolls 77**
User avatar #49 to #37 - luddethebunny
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
random dubs win
#22 to #1 - animedudej
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
#27 to #22 - broswagonist
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#36 to #27 - animedudej
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
waited longer than i'd like to admit to post that...
#3 - itsmewaffle
Reply +95 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
He's not wrong, I guess.
User avatar #4 to #3 - mooproxy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Well, if we were to be pedantic, then force is proportional to rate of change of momentum.
But yeah, a few assumptions later it's mass times acceleration.
User avatar #6 to #4 - myfourthaccount
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Exept that momentum is mass times velocity and the time rate of change would be Mass times the derivative of velocity, which is acceleration.
So you practically just said the same thing. Talk about pointless comments
User avatar #9 to #6 - mooproxy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
a) proportional isn't the same as equal to
b) F=ma only works if mass remains constant, and Newtons are used as the unit of force.

Like I said, a few modelling assumptions later, it reduces to mass times acceleration, but if we were to be pedantic (or solve out a good few equations where calculating acceleration is a waste of time) then it's proportional to rate of change of momentum.
User avatar #32 to #9 - greenmurderer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
2nd law of Newton as I was taught:

dp/dt = sum F (p = m*v)
dv/dt * m + dm/dt * v = sum F

if m = const. (--> dm/dt = 0)
dv/dt * m = sum F
or
a * m = sum F

feeling so smart
technically should be vectors
User avatar #34 to #32 - greenmurderer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
so basically you just differentiate p (=m*v) with respect to t
#47 to #34 - mooproxy
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #11 to #9 - myfourthaccount
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
unless we are talking outter space, there are very few occasions where the object loses significant mass as a function of time, so really, for 90% of the case on earth, its just equal to mass times acceleration. That's all I was saying
User avatar #10 to #9 - blargchikahonkhonk
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
if we are being pedantic F=ma only holds true in inertial frames of reference so conditions need to be stated
User avatar #2 - narutardg
Reply -49 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
okay, i will not accept that. being the nerd-geek hybrid that i am, in knowing the difference between the two i will conclude that THAT is a nerd. one who thinks right-brain-articulate, while the geek is one who is left-brain-fanbase. hence the difference, so don't you DARE confuse the two you dense ****.
User avatar #25 to #2 - narutardg
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
hey guys, if you keep thumbing down my comment you'll actually help me win a bet with my friends for the most ******** comment.

-500 says i get $100
User avatar #29 to #25 - bagguhsleep
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
>"I was just pretending to be stupid h-haha"
User avatar #35 to #29 - narutardg
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
whatever gets me paid bro
User avatar #52 to #35 - bagguhsleep
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Hope this awful attempt at damage control ends up working for you in the long run then, *****.
User avatar #21 to #2 - neonbrony
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
It's ok, I tried so hard to tell my friends the difference..... to no avail...
User avatar #5 to #2 - olmesy
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Is that really something you should get angry about? I mean, genuinely angry about?
User avatar #12 to #5 - Tusura
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
What do you expect? He's a Narutard.

I like naruto and all, but that's going a bit far.
User avatar #16 to #2 - aldothenazi
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
As a nerd-geek hybrid you should know right-brain left-brain is bs.
#8 to #2 - fecal
Reply +73 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
wow I know you are trying really hard but you still appear like the least interesting person the world has ever seen
User avatar #51 to #8 - hazardpay
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Ill give a shot at rewording his sentence to make it sound better.
"Eh, i wouldnt give it to him, even poeple who havent seen the movie know this line, he's probably just being a smartass, no pun intended."
#33 to #8 - ripgeckosncherios
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
TECHNICALLY he is correct: nerds are "...mass times acceleration", meaning people who do sciencey stuff, do lots of work for school etc.
While nerds ("...with you") have a high connection with a fandom which they care about deeply.
He just worded it REALLY bad.

Disclaimer: I have no idea if that is correct, it is jsut what he appeared to try to say and what I remember hearing 2 years ago
#13 - warburg
Reply +36 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
#15 - holeymoley
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
User avatar #26 to #15 - iviagic
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
I thought it said "Islams internally"
User avatar #20 - byobgraffpro
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
honestly idc if he was wrong, that answer was amazing. that guy looks an awful like bill hader. was this a skit on SNL or was chuck on a gameshow a while ago
User avatar #23 to #20 - collateraldamageco
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Bill Hader often gets confused for Bill Hader
it's something he's had to deal with ever since he found out he was Bill Hader
#50 to #23 - hazardpay
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#19 - wakster
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
ALL HAIL THE ROUND MOUND OF REBOUND, SIR CHARLES BARKLEY.
#17 - Epicgetguy
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Post Slam Jams.

Hotline Quad City - Quad City DJs vs Perturbator
#31 - finishhimlarry
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #24 - listened
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2014) [-]
Reel Quotes - Charles Barkley Full Video
[ 52 comments ]
Leave a comment