Trying to break in.... .. WHAT THEY DID WAS WRONG! They should have broken all of the windows... and slashed the tires. Trying to break in WHAT THEY DID WAS WRONG! They should have broken all of the windows and slashed tires
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (439)
[ 439 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #2 - monswine
Reply +96 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
what's the US law on this? I assume it's state by state.
#122 to #2 - penguinsaresexy
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
It's called duress. Meaning it is ok to commit a crime if it is to prevent a worse crime like negligent homicide of a child. Or how you won't be convicted if you rob someone because someone said they would murder your whole family if you didn't do it for them
User avatar #4 to #2 - sighchicken
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
most southern states permit this. owners be ****** though... animal cruelty/endangerment.
#76 to #2 - anon id: bdca0b14
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You'll be able to help the animal, but your paying for the destruction of the property for damn sure.
User avatar #125 to #2 - unncommon
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
As long as you inform the police after doing so, you can break in.
#268 to #125 - anon id: 3dea6f79
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
lol no you call them first...
User avatar #8 to #2 - MakiChan
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
animals and small children left in cars allows a passerby to break in to the car to save them because like someone said, it may be too late by the time help arrives. then the moron that owns the car will be in trouble for neglect. its like doing a citizens arrest, you have permission to do it if the need arises for you to do it.

you do still have to call the authorities over at some point during the process.
User avatar #3 to #2 - hwangw
Reply +562 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
It's legal. You're allowed to break into cars to help a child or animal locked inside I believe.
#15 to #3 - fistefist
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
That's pretty great, good job America
That's pretty great, good job America
#17 to #15 - cryoutloud
Reply +43 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
#53 to #3 - kaboomz
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
good job america
good job america
#413 to #3 - anon id: f553051f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
as in destroy items or buildings to save lifes
#308 to #3 - anon id: 2a40d5ce
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I believe the punishment can vary from city to city as well, such as here in Austin, TX the temperatures are so extreme leaving a animal in a car is charged as child endangerment rather than animal cruelty.
User avatar #298 to #3 - penileburglar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Why does this have thumbs? It's outright wrong. I know for a fact in VA that you have to contact the police, this just happened in my area.

Now, if it really looks like the child / animal in question was on the verge of death, the police may choose not to charge you, but it's DEFINITELY illegal.
User avatar #422 to #298 - hwangw
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Here (in Texas) it's illegal to leave a pet or a child under the age of 7 locked in a car for longer than 5 minutes. If a passerby sees either in a situation like this they're supposed to call the police first, of course. But if the pet or child appears to be in distress they're allowed to break the window furthest from the child/pet in order to rescue it, give water, whatever. And they must stay there until the police arrive.
User avatar #434 to #422 - penileburglar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2014) [-]
Yeah, it varies heavily state-by-state. Can't assume that one state is the same as another.
#191 to #3 - anon id: 8342d2e1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
False.
If you see either locked in the vehicle, you contact PD immideately. You are only justified in court to break into the vehicle if you can say without a doubt that if you DIDN'T act the being in question would have sustained GREATER harm. If not, the owner of the vehicle can sue you for damages to personal property.
Now keep in mind that "danger zone" wiggle-room is a little more lenient when it involves a human being than a canine.
#11 to #3 - anon id: 80d2258d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
even a bee?
User avatar #90 to #11 - gatorade
Reply +124 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Especially bees.
#333 to #90 - nthmetal
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#331 to #90 - Exar
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
DID SOMEONE SAY BEES?!
#358 to #90 - empithree
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
not the wasps tho.
those are evil.
#371 to #90 - XzmanX
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #5 to #3 - monswine
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Shouldn't you contact animal welfare police before attempting vigilante justice? Can you just steal someone's dog from their home if you suspect or have witnessed abuse? Even if the trial were short I feel like there would be one in that situation.
User avatar #6 to #5 - hwangw
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
The animal could die before they get there, the point is to save the animal, because it's life is in immediate danger. It's exactly what the people you call are going to do. Now you don't run off with the animal or anything, but you can remove it from he vehicle. And if you suspect abuse then you call it in, if you see the owner actively trying to kill the animal then you can try and save it.
User avatar #7 to #6 - monswine
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
fair enough.
#10 to #7 - reaperboy
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
but that aside, people will still break into your vehicle. Even if the conditions are fine to leave your animal inside. like 60 Fahrenheit on a cloudy day. just because they are pretentious twats
User avatar #33 to #10 - turbodoosh
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
^this. I had this exact thing happen to me at my own home. (We left my dog in the car not 10 minutes before some trashy self righteous twat started spewing hate and racism at my gf and calling animal abuse.)

She even called the cops on us.
User avatar #59 to #33 - dunderbiffen
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
This also happens when you have electric car that is actually on for 5 minutes so condition air is also on, but because those cars are so quiet people still manage to break windows and call cops even though everything is fine.
User avatar #63 to #59 - turbodoosh
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
There's a post about that right?

Anyways yeah this lady had apparently been doing to to literally any cars she was seeing with pets left in them. The cop who we talked to said we were like the 12th incident on her list of her spewing ********.

We called it a hate crime (gf chinese) and the next time she calls they'll take her in for falsifying a police report
User avatar #66 to #63 - monswine
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
pretentious twats man...
User avatar #198 to #59 - dabugman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Most states it is illegal to leave a car running (key in ignition) unattended. Even in cold weather to melt the ice off. Remote car starters are the exception.
#201 to #5 - anon id: 7448343d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
"Vigilante justice" ***** its smashing a window so a dog does not die. Pussy ass bitch
User avatar #1 - kingderps
Reply +236 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
WHAT THEY DID WAS WRONG! They should have broken all of the windows... and slashed the tires.
#46 to #1 - anon id: 94ed6333
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
But only three of them, so that the cunt can't claim on insurance. (Y)
User avatar #303 to #1 - ablenightroad
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
**** you dude that **** is expensive
User avatar #70 to #1 - toosexyforyou
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Spoken like a true idiot who wants to give the asshole a chance to sue you for money.
User avatar #441 to #70 - kingderps
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/07/2014) [-]
If he tries then they should kill his ******* ass, burn his ass and cut his face to pieces and eat his face.
User avatar #442 to #441 - toosexyforyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/07/2014) [-]
Calm your tits, it's just a dog. No one really gives a ****.
User avatar #443 to #442 - kingderps
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/07/2014) [-]
eat his ass too
#13 - anon id: 2747c35f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Dog deserved it, she was a total bitch
User avatar #30 to #13 - dharkmoswen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I'd ask how you know she was in heat, but I'm not sure I want to know the answer...
User avatar #14 to #13 - hypermetaljacob
Reply +134 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I think this MAY have been a pun on female dogs being bitches guys. calm yo tits
#16 to #14 - vladhellsing
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
> Telling FJ not to thumb down an anon.
> Telling FJ not to thumb down an anon.
#207 to #16 - Xannder
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #417 to #14 - thepandaking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
and people thumb you down, almost like they're insisting he was serious. oh god I love this site
User avatar #91 - minorian
Reply -96 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
The human race:

Breaks into a car to save another persons pet. Goes home and eats a pork sandwich, while putting out rat poison that will make the rodents bleed to death, and sit down in their letter sofa, thinking about the dog they "saved".

Yes, it awakens feelings inside of us to see this dog being rescued from death, but isn't that seriously hypocritical?
User avatar #127 to #91 - ssheadshot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Liberal Pansy.
User avatar #135 to #127 - minorian
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I am arguing that they should have left the dog, idiot.
User avatar #220 to #135 - ssheadshot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
So you are both, arguing for being a liberal pansy, and a rampaging heartless douche bag at the same time. Impressive.
User avatar #222 to #220 - minorian
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Thanks, I am trying.
#145 to #91 - anon id: 67eecc77
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
letter sofa ahahahaah you ******* dumbass
User avatar #251 to #91 - primsun
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You got 66 problems and now I'm 67. Who will be 69?
User avatar #253 to #251 - minorian
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
stfu, circle jerking faggot. Why can't you people see how cancer you are? You don't even care what I wrote, just that you can circle jerk around me.
User avatar #256 to #253 - primsun
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Now that I have your attention, I believe that it is time we have an actual intelligent discussion. First, I propose the question, what makes an animals life valuable to begin with? or for that, anyones?
User avatar #263 to #256 - minorian
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Are you asking my opinion? Because that is a question of opinion.
User avatar #282 to #263 - primsun
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
It is a question of opinion. However, it is only an acceptable answer if it makes logical sense. If you want to convince people you are right and that animals have rights, you need to do it logically and be able to defend it. So yes, I am asking for your well thought out, logical opinion.
User avatar #258 to #91 - ifeelbatman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Wow you're so edgy and cool I wish I was as cool as you.
JK You're a ******* tard.
User avatar #359 to #91 - Anemophobia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
one is man's best friend and the other is an over populated rodent crawling with disease, nature over populates the rats and humans and other predators are the control, imagine if we let the rats run rampant
#167 to #91 - fishinyourface
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
you're no better than us. Want to know why? You probably took antibiotics at some point in your life. the **** is wrong with you? killing an innocent bacteria simply because it was trying to live? puts hypocrisy in perspective doesn't it?
you're no better than us. Want to know why? You probably took antibiotics at some point in your life. the **** is wrong with you? killing an innocent bacteria simply because it was trying to live? puts hypocrisy in perspective doesn't it?
User avatar #174 to #167 - minorian
Reply -19 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I am arguing that they should have left the dog.

I haven't taken antibiotics ever, neither gotten my vaccines, because my dad's one of those conspiracy theorists, but IF I was arguing for not killing anything, then it would have been a nice try at least.
#186 to #174 - kibbleking
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You're a ******* lunatic.
You're a ******* lunatic.
#179 to #174 - fishinyourface
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
oh I see it now. the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.  Now this makes sense.
oh I see it now. the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Now this makes sense.
User avatar #189 to #179 - minorian
Reply -13 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
If that's how you wanna argue, then let's leave it at this.
User avatar #326 to #174 - fukkentyranitar
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Do you actually think about the ******** you say, or does everything fall out of your mouth in a jumbled up ***********?
User avatar #124 to #91 - inquisition
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
idk why all the red, this is all true
User avatar #131 to #124 - minorian
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Because people here are faggots, who can't ******* think for themselves, and think I'm one of those fake-ass liberal/vegan posters, so they all jump on the bandwagon. God, I hate humans as a whole.
#94 to #91 - deletedmyaccount
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Not really. Dogs are beneficial to humanity in a number of ways. Rats on the other hand, are a little more harmful to us, as they eat our food and don't contribute anything in return.
#101 to #94 - minorian
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #105 to #94 - minorian
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
So the two girls rescued the dog so it could help them hunt? Nah, bro.
#107 to #105 - deletedmyaccount
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
That's not the only way they're beneficial. Petting animals is shown to relieve stress and fight depression (dogs being the most useful for this because they have been domesticated and trained not to hurt people), seeing eye dogs, police dogs, and the like.
User avatar #129 to #107 - minorian
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
So the two girls rescued the dog so they could pet it to relieve stress, or use it as a seeing eye? We are talking about a specific scenario, not why humans have domesticated certain animals over others through the ages.

Forget it, you're obviously one of those faggots, who keep making new arguments up.
#433 to #129 - deletedmyaccount
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2014) [-]
I've not made up any new arguments, I've been reiterating what I've already said.

The girls saved a dog, and that was a good thing. Going home and killing animals that invade their territory or are raised for meat is not hypocritical, because those animals were either raised to be eaten, or have a more parasitic relationship with us, where as dogs are beneficial.

You are a master of the straw man argument, though.
#216 to #129 - anon id: 1dbd156c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Your account should be deleted now. With all these down votes, you should leave yourself in a hot car.
User avatar #219 to #216 - minorian
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
At least I have an account, faggot.
User avatar #170 to #91 - levelninetynine
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Let me simplify this a little for you. For the most part pigs are killed quickly. People don't put them in hot ovens for them to slowly and painfully die. Rats spread diseases, eat your food, and multiply every damn month. Also you need to consider culture. People from another country would eaten the dog. Would you still be spewing **** if it was a child that was about to die from heat exhaustion?
User avatar #177 to #170 - minorian
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Read the thread.
User avatar #195 to #177 - levelninetynine
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I guess I'm confused why you find them hypocritical. You can't really justify their actions based on your own beliefs. I know this gif. was probably taken from a commercial or something but the main message it's trying to get across is that your car is hot as **** during the summer and will kill whatever is inside; albeit your 6 pack of beer or your newborn child. But let me ask you this. Are you trying to say people are hypocritical because they chose to save one life over some other life form?
User avatar #221 to #195 - minorian
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I find the celebration of their actions hypocritical, and not their actions themselves.
User avatar #196 to #91 - durkadurka
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Huge difference there bud. It is necessary for us to eat , so some animals must die.
Animals such as rats are pests: They spread disease, cause damage to property, etc. Killing them is often necessary.

The dog's suffering is completely unnecessary. It serves no purpose. This is why we care; we will kill out of necessity but generally abhor pain and suffering otherwise.
User avatar #214 to #196 - minorian
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Those are valid logical reasons, but that's not why we do those things. We prefer meat, because it is tastier and we are accustomed to it, and we primarily kill pests because they are a nuisance and not because they are a danger to us.

They saved the dog, because this is the suffering that they can see; you don't see the rats cringe as they die of internal bleeding and hemorrhaging. We also project our feelings on dogs easier, because they have been domesticated in such a large scale.

User avatar #231 to #214 - fingledingles
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
We eat meat because we need the protein, not because we prefer it. My grand father got lassa fever from being bitten by a rat, so I believe pests are dangerous.
User avatar #235 to #231 - minorian
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
No, and okay.
User avatar #239 to #235 - fingledingles
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
My point is that we kill pests because they spread disease and ****. That seems to be a very logical reason to try and kill them off. Plus, humans eating meat is natural. Why do you think we are omnivores?
User avatar #245 to #239 - minorian
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Those are valid logical reasons, but that's not why we do those things. We prefer meat, because it is tastier and we are accustomed to it, and we primarily kill pests because they are a nuisance and not because they are a danger to us.

They saved the dog, because this is the suffering that they can see; you don't see the rats cringe as they die of internal bleeding and hemorrhaging. We also project our feelings on dogs easier, because they have been domesticated in such a large scale.
User avatar #248 to #245 - fingledingles
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Copying and pasting an argument you just made 20 minutes ago isn't going to help you. You aren't even trying, are you?
User avatar #252 to #248 - minorian
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I did it on purpose, because I just read one line and it was the same as he wrote, and that's even the thread you commented on.
User avatar #265 to #252 - fingledingles
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Yes we kill pests because they are an nuisance. Don't you think that the fact that they caused humans so much trouble in the past because they spread diseases like the plague annoying?
User avatar #292 to #245 - primsun
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
To add to this, you have failed to demonstrate why this is wrong. We recognize the dogs suffering as it here stands because, like you acknowledged, we have more feelings towards them. Similarly, we are open more to the suffering of our family or our children before the suffering of others. My point here is this, a dog is saved because we care and out of our care for it comes its "rights." The same goes for people, if we didn't care what rights would others have. Does a murderer have the right to live if he is on death row? Do I have the right to kill a man breaking into my house? How about a woman breaking into my house. We are contextual, comparing beings. One thing only has value because something else has less value.
User avatar #115 to #91 - angelwithashotgun
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Our body needs the protein from meat to survive - I have seen footage of lions eating a baby elephant alive, after that you don't have a problem with eating meat from humanely killed animals

Rats are carriers of decease capable of unleashing a deadly epidemic - Black plague

Dogs live with us and are dependent on us taking care of it, and not locking it in the equivalent of an oven.
User avatar #137 to #115 - minorian
Reply -13 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
******* idiot, not even gonna answer this one, because this guy is just ******* stupid.

No, let me answer with a response just as intelligent as yours:
"Dude, the dog is made of mostly water and water just becomes steam so they should just have let that dog become a aWESOME STEAM SPIRIT INSTEAD... man"
#139 to #137 - angelwithashotgun
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
#117 to #91 - finkerrinker
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
User avatar #126 to #91 - slenderwolf
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
We domesticated dogs, we took on responsibility for them, we have to care for them. Rodents like rats are interlopers in my house, plus leather feels real nice
User avatar #134 to #126 - minorian
Reply -12 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Oh, so those two rebellious girls saved the dog, because humanity has domesticated it? Now I see.

******* faggots, who use domestication and logical reason, to argue why two girls did something that they obviously did out of sentimentality.
User avatar #149 to #134 - plazmaflare
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
If thats not proper reasoning try this. That dog belongs to someone. Someone has emotional feelings and cares for that dog. Even if the owner doesnt care about it, the girls do, thats why they rescued it. They don't care about the cow or the rats, so they're okay with killing it. So basically they take GOOD care of something they do care about, and do whatever to the animals they DONT care about.
User avatar #151 to #149 - minorian
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Yeah, that's what I'm saying, what the ****? They did it, because they feel bad for specimens of one specie, but not for other species. My opinion is that this sentimentality is not only misplaced; that it is not logical that they feel bad for dogs.
User avatar #165 to #151 - plazmaflare
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Well if you don't think its logical and somebody else doesnt find a problem with it theres not much to say. Opinions just differ, oh well.
User avatar #169 to #165 - minorian
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
An opinion as opposed to what? Did you think my comments were factual evidence? Of course they are opinions.
User avatar #180 to #169 - plazmaflare
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Im saying that they're just opinions. No need to care about those any more than they girls should or shouldn't over those dogs. Everyone has something they care about, what they care about shouldn't be your concern. Also caring about anothers opinion over the internet isn't really logical, but you're still doing it.
User avatar #187 to #180 - minorian
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Now you're just trying to grasp onto something, so you can feel like you are the enlightened one here.

All things said are opinions, unless they are facts. None of my comments have focused on facts, but on opinion, so what the **** is your point again? That you don't have to necessarily care about my comment on the internet? No, of course not, you'd commit suicide if you cared about how big a faggot I think you are.
User avatar #190 to #187 - plazmaflare
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I was trying to have an honest discussion. Oh well seems like you're on some high horse. Have a nice day.
User avatar #197 to #190 - minorian
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I am sorry, I am just really heated over this thread, because some people are so dense, so might taken it out on you.
I read your comments through again, and I think I understand what you mean now; that I should not care about why they care about the dog because it is not my concern.

They are acting on their caring, which makes it everyone's concern. It's no longer just an opinion.
User avatar #225 to #197 - plazmaflare
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I understand, I was just trying to help you understand why someone may act like this, to show it to you from their point of view.
User avatar #228 to #225 - minorian
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I do understand, every person, who is not a psychopath, should be able to understand. I would also feel the same way. I just believe that if we set feelings aside, it's all the things I said about it before.
User avatar #232 to #228 - plazmaflare
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You should've mentioned setting feelings aside, because if thats the case then i understand where you're coming from.
User avatar #240 to #232 - minorian
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Nice, but isn't that what sentimentality means, which I write in pretty much every comment? Do you get why I'm frustrated that people don't read what I write and just circlejerk each other now?
User avatar #243 to #240 - plazmaflare
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I suppose so but delivery of your message is important, along with first impressions.
User avatar #250 to #243 - minorian
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I start discussions like these to vent steam. I hate being polite when I write, because it just hinders everything, when you've got to think about people's feelings. If one get their feelings hurt, it's either their own fault or they secretly found my point valid, so either way, it's a win if people get mad.
User avatar #257 to #250 - plazmaflare
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Well if someone gets mad that's as hindering as being polite. The message you want to send tends to come out or be received differently when you're angry, if you made your points to someone without using insults, they are more likely to understand it in the way you intended to be understood. Also if you want to make your point and not be concerned with others feelings, you shouldn't get upset when someone, or in this case several people attack(s) you.
User avatar #260 to #257 - minorian
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I don't really care if people change their mind when I'm arguing with them, probably because that has never happened in the history of the internet, so I'd rather just call them all faggots and get some satisfaction out of that, but you are right that it would be more effective if I was more polite, but I'm aiming more for entertainment than effectiveness if I have to be honest.
User avatar #261 to #260 - plazmaflare
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Well, to each his own i suppose, you have a nice day now.
User avatar #264 to #261 - minorian
-1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You too.
User avatar #285 to #134 - slenderwolf
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Eh, no matter the reasoning I'd do the same thing, if only to test the glass breaker on my pocket knife on an actual car window.
#100 to #91 - anon id: 39695a59
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
We care about dogs, we don't so much about rats and pigs. Although some people do care about those.
I think pigs being livestock is pretty unfortunate though, because they are as smart as dogs in many cases.
User avatar #294 to #100 - ironsoul
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Having dealt with pigs, I can tell you that they are WAY more vicious than a dog. My brother isn't allowed to feed ours because he sometimes gets seizures, and the pigs my eat him if he collapsed in their pen. Whereas our dog starts barking and whining when he has seizures because she is scared.
User avatar #102 to #100 - minorian
Reply -15 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I'm not saying it illogical, I'm saying the sentimentality is hypocritical. That this was a heroic act. You guys have been man hunting fake vegans on the internet for too long that you are seeing things.
User avatar #114 to #102 - Shramin
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Animals raised to be eaten are still not to be tortured and people go out of their way to save them when they are.

Rat and other pests bring disease, if you are ok with a spread of sickness than good for you, but the rest of society doesn't.

It's not hypocritical, its systematic.
User avatar #130 to #114 - minorian
Reply -12 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Holy ****, you people are missing the point. These girls didn't do this out of a logical reason, but out of sentimentality.

I am not questioning whether terminating pests is a logical thing to do, I am questioning whether our celebration of their action is misplaced sentimentality.
User avatar #138 to #130 - Shramin
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
you mentioned the pest termination, but you ignored my mention that people will save all forms of animals being tortured, including farm animals intended for food.

They saved a dog they saw was dying from being stuck in a car on a hot day, sure it is sentimental, it is also the logical thing to do.

Unless you are saying you just watch animals suffering because saving them would be "Too sentimental".
User avatar #144 to #138 - minorian
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
"(...)but you ignored my mention that people will save all forms of animals being tortured, including farm animals intended for food."
People will save farm animals from death even if they are on their way to the slaughterhouse, they don't have to be tortured, it's human nature to be compassionate. I am arguing that it's misplaced sentimentality/compassion.

"They saved a dog they saw was dying from being stuck in a car on a hot day, sure it is sentimental, it is also the logical thing to do."
Why is that the logical thing to do? Where lies the logic in that? It's illegal, it's not their dog and it wont benefit them in any known way.
User avatar #152 to #144 - Shramin
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
oh okay, I hope I never get in trouble in front of you, you would just leave me to die as a stranger I am assuming, enjoy your life of "Nobody should ever do anything to be nice and helpful to every aspect of society".
User avatar #153 to #152 - minorian
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Thanks.
User avatar #154 to #153 - Shramin
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You are welcome person who posted logical fallacy image without understanding it.
User avatar #158 to #154 - minorian
Reply -10 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Wanna discuss more and lose another argument over my usage of the fallacies?
User avatar #171 to #158 - Shramin
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Nevermind **** this I am done, you learned big words recently and have decided you are so much smarter than others I am not even going to bother.

"Oh but then I win by default" yeah ok keep telling yourself that it won't make you less stupid.
User avatar #168 to #158 - Shramin
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Wait I lost an argument to you?

You are the one who fails to understand why saving a dog in a car is a logical thing to do for both self benefit and dog benefit.
User avatar #316 to #144 - neokun
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
**** me people must hate you in real life.
User avatar #97 to #91 - superbigfupa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
No
#95 to #91 - deletedmyaccount
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
And pigs are most useful to us as food. So there's that.
#148 to #91 - minorian
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You guys are all ******* cancer. I'll go back to my forums, where people actually pretend to care about not being stupid idiots that just circle wank each other.


Read this so you might evolve in a hundred years or so.
#202 to #148 - durkadurka
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
User avatar #418 to #148 - thepandaking
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
"go back to my forums, where people actually pretend to care about not being stupid idiots where everyone agrees with me"
also evolving in 100 years? gosh I hope so, that would be incredible.
User avatar #377 to #91 - schnizel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
We like dogs.
User avatar #96 to #91 - scrumdiddlyumpshus
Reply +91 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
yes i too believe we should stop slaughtering the alphabet and harvesting their letter.
User avatar #271 to #96 - cdmin
Reply -17 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
weak repond to a meaningfull text. i rate 0/10
#342 to #271 - anon id: aba01411
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I think you meant to say edgy.
User avatar #98 - thedungeonmaster
Reply +71 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
**** i'm retarded. At first I thought they were breaking into the car and the rock hit the dog and ****** it up so they were gonna leave it on the ground to make it look like the dog crashed through the window. Then I wondered why she was giving it water.
User avatar #200 to #98 - shenro
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
i thought that they broke in the car and noticed a dog sleeping so they put it on the ground carefully so he doesnt wake up but then i realised what they were doing once they gave him water
User avatar #157 to #98 - ljxjlos
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Exactly what I thought, too.
User avatar #338 to #98 - YllekNayr
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
How the hell did you come up with that line of reasoning?
#64 - dickthebutt
Reply +64 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
u avin a giggle m8?
#74 to #64 - stevecartel
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #133 - katarinaismywaifu
Reply -79 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Ultimately it is HIS dog. He paid for it and should be allowed to do what he wants with it. You can't just go around breaking peoples car windows. What's next? You see a bumblebee trapped in a car and you're gonna break the window to free it too?
User avatar #380 to #133 - thisisnotaname
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Maximum overbait
#411 to #133 - spagete
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
paint skills off the charts, but you get the point
User avatar #146 to #133 - cfeuer
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
yes. no. yes you can. no. no.
#162 to #133 - fishinyourface
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
that's like saying you can beat your children because it's YOURS and YOU had it......just because he bought a dog doesn't give him the right to treat it like ****.
that's like saying you can beat your children because it's YOURS and YOU had it......just because he bought a dog doesn't give him the right to treat it like ****.
#230 to #162 - anon id: 1dbd156c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I beat the crap out of my dog when he rips **** up. Guess what, he stops ripping whatever it was up. Now he finds something else I have not beat him for and rips it up. Its a cycle for dogs.
User avatar #184 to #162 - katarinaismywaifu
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
There's nothing wrong with beating children to discipline them.
#192 to #184 - nargogh
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Then why your parents didn't hit you hard enough apparently?
#233 to #192 - anon id: 1dbd156c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
What have you done with your life and do you have a criminal record?
User avatar #304 to #184 - babylien
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I agree on this, but not on the dog part though.
#278 to #133 - usernameistaken
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Eat ****.
User avatar #360 to #133 - shabadaka
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
>Level -312
kek
#274 to #133 - lelwut
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
#287 to #133 - lethaldose
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
#290 to #133 - nipplelessmage
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
hell ******* yea im gonna break that window.   
bumble bees make sweet delicious honey and pollinate flowers. cant just let that kind of **** go unrewarded. gotta look out for them little fellas
hell ******* yea im gonna break that window.
bumble bees make sweet delicious honey and pollinate flowers. cant just let that kind of **** go unrewarded. gotta look out for them little fellas
#182 to #133 - kibbleking
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
#193 to #133 - underthetable
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
its animal cruelty and it is illegal. I think we should leave you in the car with the windows up and the heat on.
User avatar #194 to #193 - katarinaismywaifu
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I would just open the door and walk out fag
#212 to #194 - Dinmiller
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Duct tape and gorilla glue/tape your hands and feet together, take you out to death valley and leave you in the back seat of the car.
User avatar #213 to #212 - katarinaismywaifu
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Break window. Jump out and hide under car. You people ******* suck balls. Animal lovers go join PETA.
#217 to #213 - Dinmiller
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Break window with your hands and feet tapped and glued together? Lmfao that is indeed a good one. How great a troll you are.
User avatar #223 to #217 - katarinaismywaifu
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Headbutt.
#392 to #194 - anon id: 70170ee6
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
And if the doors were welded shut and the windows were impenetrable?
#199 to #194 - underthetable
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Such disobedience...I have to ask how old you are. No one is this heartless. And no if you get out of the car i'll shoot you in the tittie.
#236 to #199 - anon id: 1dbd156c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Try blowing children up with explosives because their society deemed it necessary that the little ***** try to deactivate a controlled detonation. Afghanistan bitch.
#254 to #236 - underthetable
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
what
User avatar #147 to #133 - plazmaflare
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You don't understand that this is animal cruelty. The dog is dieng. this happens with babies too. He should be allowed to kill his dog because he owns it?
User avatar #156 to #133 - ljxjlos
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Bumblebee and Dog are completely seperate cases.

You can´t own a living being to a point where you can just leave it to die.
User avatar #150 to #133 - jewishcommunazi
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Yeah, it's like that one time I bought some ukrainian girl to keep as my sex slave and people started to get mad at me for it... She is mine, I paid for her, I should do what I want with her. What's next? Will they take away my cotton pickers?
#334 to #133 - impureparadox
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
if slavery becomes legal again I'm gonna buy you and and do what i want with you.
User avatar #317 to #133 - neokun
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I have ******* had it with you trolling pieces of ****. Why do you spend you time trying to annoy people? Its mentally not ******* normal. Make yourself happy, go to the gym, play games, meet people, have friends. Be what your ******* not right now. No one ******* likes you kind of people that just go around trying to cause arguments. And the worst ******* part of all of it is that people just accept assholes like you and act like its a normal part of society. Which in fairness it is. But does not make it right. Why do you get such a hard on for making people angry? You people are clinically ******* unstable. Get help.
#226 to #133 - bluelightbebop
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
User avatar #361 to #133 - Anemophobia
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
nice try
#208 to #133 - corsairair
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
**** You.
User avatar #279 to #133 - zzjames
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
How hasn't this account been banned yet from being thumbed down to oblivion?
User avatar #296 to #279 - alphavsomega
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
banning from red thumbs was turned off a while ago
#284 to #133 - garyhasmorebadges
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
F is for go **** yourself
U is for Uranus after prison
N is for Aw **** ***** what are you doing bait meh meh down here in the half racial sea.
#181 to #133 - anon id: 82d37fdc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
are you retarded
User avatar #241 to #133 - hellwain
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Someone should pour gasoline on you and sett you on fire.
#163 to #133 - Ulmer
Reply +51 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
#164 to #163 - Ulmer
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
User avatar #166 to #164 - katarinaismywaifu
Reply -25 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Samefag. And also you can't just go around destroying peoples property to inflate your ego. Get off your high-horse.
User avatar #238 to #166 - deathpwn
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Because the first thing I think when I see a kid or a dog in a hot car is "****, I should break this window so people think i'm the ****"

It's down to the question of what's more important, a creatures life or personal property. I'll give you a hint, one's irreplaceable.
User avatar #325 to #238 - ablenightroad
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Kid>Property>dog at least in my opinion. If you want to break someones window to get a dog out fine but you can pay for that ****. If you don't want to pay call the cops so they can open the door without damage to the vehicle.
User avatar #387 to #325 - elcreepo
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Dog might not have that much time. It's sad when you value the life of a dog as less than a human.
User avatar #437 to #387 - ablenightroad
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/29/2014) [-]
How exactly is that sad? Isn't it a little messed up that you would value a dog's life more than that of a fellow human being?
User avatar #438 to #437 - elcreepo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/29/2014) [-]
I never said that, I said I value it as EQUAL to a fellow human being.

I would smash a car window for BOTH a child and a dog.
User avatar #262 to #166 - Ulmer
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You are what is wrong with the human race.
User avatar #237 to #166 - OperativeOpposite
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
You're a cunt.
User avatar #386 to #166 - elcreepo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Dog is not property.

If dog dies, it is called animal abuse.

Preventing animal abuse is the right thing to do.
#412 to #166 - anon id: 589a0036
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
okay, I'll humor you.

even if that was true. the dog could die of heat stroke in that car. what could the dog possibly have done to deserve something like that? discipline is designed to teach, what does the dog learn from dying of heatstroke?
#398 to #166 - anon id: f55b3cfb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
level -312
#227 to #166 - anon id: 1dbd156c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I find this law being abused and made available to harass people. I can understand not leaving a small child alone. A dog or cat on the other hand, unless it is terribly hot, a cracked window is fine. But if the idiots are going to be away from their car for more than say, 10 minutes. The idiots should of left the pet home.
#140 - rolex
Reply +49 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
what a ****** guard dog But for real, what a ****** owner
User avatar #249 - propanex
Reply -25 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Oh there's a dying dog in a car, better look around to make sure no one sees me saving this dog.

-.-
User avatar #272 to #249 - yorker
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
cockknocker
User avatar #259 to #249 - mrwalkerfour
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
they were looking to see if the owner of the car was around,
#410 to #259 - anon id: a714a966
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
How are two strangers going to know what the owner of the car looks like? And even if the owner was around, do you think he would care enough to open the car for his dog that he left dying in the backseat?
User avatar #275 to #259 - propanex
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
No, the whole purpose of this commercial was to make it look like these kids were trying to break in to steal something, then it turned into an awareness commercial. If you saw a baby/dog dying in a hot car you wouldn't look around all mean looking. You would just break in...
User avatar #309 to #275 - mrwalkerfour
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
they looked around mean looking because they were angry about the fact someone had left their dog like that, it was done intentionally so that their angry faces could be misinterpreted by the viewer initially, but once you see the dog you realize why they were looking around like that.

no i wouldn't just break in right away like an idiot, id rule out every other option first, which is what they did, they checked for the owner, then they tried the door, THEN they opted to break in. you rule out all other options before you start smashing stuff
User avatar #310 to #309 - propanex
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Anger isn't the first step
#314 to #310 - mrwalkerfour
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
#302 to #275 - zyketor
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
I can't believe you're getting thumbed down so much. Such insane idiocy on this site lately....
User avatar #313 to #302 - choclategum
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Actually no he's not. Use your ******* common sense.
#315 to #313 - zyketor
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
The whole point of that commercial WAS to have it look like teens were breaking into a car to steal it, it's REALLY obvious.

He is entirely right, anyone that has common sense would know it.
User avatar #322 to #315 - choclategum
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
That was not the whole point of the commercial. The whole point of the commercial was A. You shouldn't leave your dog in a hot car and B. Don't immediately judge a book by its cover. Also he was saying that when people see something trapped in a hot car. They don't look around , but anybody who has ever seen a hot car video on YouTube can assure you that they look around.
User avatar #345 to #322 - propanex
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Yeah they look around, but not with an angry look. It's more of a worried look.
User avatar #347 to #345 - choclategum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
It's a combination between angry and worried looks. Some people look around worried for the dog or child and others look around angry for the owner, to see where they are and cuss them out.
#52 - kaboomz
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(07/28/2014) [-]
Comment Picture