Upload
Login or register
x

Trump was right. Again.

Trump is right!’ Police say parts of Britain
ARE ) areas due to ISIS M, flamel,@
BRITISH [malice s' ' !!, have taday backed
Donald Trump' s ! , claim that parts - the . t are
areas because ref growing Iclarinet extremism.
H? rump_ turn
...
+254
Views: 11815
Favorited: 16
Submitted: 12/10/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to clancularius

Comments(63):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 63 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
59 comments displayed.
Reply
+81
#2 - anon (12/10/2015) [-]
The Daily ******* Mail and Katie Hopkins...

hardly unbiased reporting.
Reply
+3
User avatar #18 to #2 - lulzdealer ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]
Was he wrong tho?
Reply
+17
User avatar #26 to #18 - turtletroll ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
Bruh the police in Britain are total pushovers. They're scared of going into houses because people have kitchen knives so people are now trying to ban ******* sharp kitchen knives.

It has less to do with radicalization I think and the police basically being like mall cops. Although I could be wrong and parts of london could be like Baghdad but being British I wouldn't be surprised if it was the first.
Reply
+1
#37 to #26 - mumphrey (12/11/2015) [-]
Those banning knifes arent the police, but left wingers. And yes, the police are like mall cops, and i think that scares them a lot
Reply
+4
User avatar #39 to #37 - turtletroll ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
countercurrentnews.com/2014/11/british-police-calling-for-knife-ban/
surrenderyourknife.co.uk/

The surrender your knife movement is backed by the police.
Reply
+1
#43 to #39 - mumphrey (12/11/2015) [-]
Yeah, because theyre treated like mall cops.. they have no means too protect themself. i ****** up the last comment
Was gonna say something more like, they have to because the left have made it unsafe for them english not first language
Reply
0
User avatar #61 to #43 - turtletroll ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
I get your point and all but still the British police are a bit of a joke with or without weapons. They're more likely to respond if you stole a library book then if you were being robbed
Reply
+1
User avatar #34 to #26 - toosexyforyou (12/11/2015) [-]
After getting caught not investigating reports of Muslims kidnapping and raping children because they didn't want to be called out on being racist, this is definitely a step in the right direction for Britain.
Reply
0
User avatar #35 to #34 - turtletroll ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
Any sources on that.

Just no daily mail. At least 90% of the "facts" they put out end up being a load of ****
Reply
+1
User avatar #38 to #35 - toosexyforyou (12/11/2015) [-]
Huge deal that happened over a year ago, I'm not gonna google it for you but it's not something that's disputed. It happening and the reason for the Muslims getting away with it for months longer than they should have was confirmed that the police didn't want to be labeled as racists.
Reply
+1
User avatar #42 to #38 - turtletroll ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
I've checked a few websites and it doesn't actually seem to have any real information. Apparently the ring leader was a registered sex offender and they knew about some muslim groups in the area. There's nothing from any police member saying that they were scared of being labeled racist. It's a theory is all.

For all we know nobody came forward or there was any evidence to arrest the perpetrators for a while. It's like saying "we know who the bosses of the cartels are so we are just going to arrest them" you need evidence.

Of course all of this is subjective as I couldn't actually find anything really substantial
Reply
-2
User avatar #41 to #18 - mrwalkerfour ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
yes he is.

no areas are "sharia zones" theres no such thing. policemen can lie too bruh for money. notice how they never list the exact areas that are alledgedly no go zones. they dont say because they know if trhey did theyd immediately be proven wrong because people will investigate and see its horse **** .

there are no go zones for civilians yes but not because muslims. the bad areas of london are due to high crime and gang violence like you get in ANY big city. not muslims. mostly black people
Reply
+8
#30 - fukkentyranitar (12/11/2015) [-]
So you guys read a couple articles on questionable websites and believe them as fact? Aight then.
Reply
0
User avatar #36 to #30 - toosexyforyou (12/11/2015) [-]
Innocent until proven guilty.

Really though, this is more for the dank memes than the actual story.
Reply
+35
#15 - asotil (12/10/2015) [-]
Little by little

Day by Day
Reply
+2
User avatar #23 to #15 - WutsAtroll (12/11/2015) [-]
lol, 1 terrorist attack and the election belongs to Trump. People ******* hate Muslims and it's really obvious and it's enough to win an election
Reply
-1
User avatar #58 to #23 - Kanoah (12/11/2015) [-]
Well, the west has more or less been fighting a war against the middle east for damn near thirteen years now; after so long, it's tough not to immediately distrust someone who's the same color and religion of your enemy.
Reply
+20
#9 - noonelikesdan ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]
>Daily Mail
> Unknown media distributer

Please use something that is actually reliable.
Reply
-3
#33 to #9 - anon (12/11/2015) [-]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

The Daily Mail is a British daily middle-market[2][3] tabloid newspaper owned by the Daily Mail and General Trust.
First published in 1896 by Lord Northcliffe, it is the United Kingdom's second biggest-selling daily newspaper after The Sun.

Yeah man, so unknown, so unreliable.
As a britbong, never even heard of it.
Reply
+5
#46 to #33 - anon (12/11/2015) [-]
It's not that its unknown its that its ********
Reply
0
#62 to #33 - noonelikesdan ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
Uhh, I meant the second source, who turned out to be Katie Hopkins, THE most hated person in Britain, who spouts ******** and is the biggest hypocrite on the planet (She says she hates children with geographical names, one of her daughters is called India). And the Daily Mail is just a huge source for any right wing propaganda, nobody takes it seriously, it's like The Sun. Also for future reference, if I was calling the Daily Mail unknown it would be like this.

>Daily Mail
Unknown unreliable etc.
Reply
0
#63 to #20 - noonelikesdan ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
Another unreliable right wing tabloid -.-, is it really that hard to find anything which isn't bias. Ofcourse you can't find anything on right wing tabloid are publishing this **** .
Reply
0
#24 - solarisofcelestia ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
He knows what's best for us.
Reply
+1
User avatar #56 to #24 - deroderpderp ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
I dont think they'd be on good terms, but neither of them are dumbasses. So unlike Obama, Putin wouldn't nuke the **** out of him the first chance he got.
Reply
+5
User avatar #28 to #24 - trollmobile ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
you'd be a fool to think that trump would in any way team up with putin.

he's a far more agressive politician than obama or bush, and if there's one thing russia hates, it's america being agressive.
Reply
0
User avatar #29 to #28 - solarisofcelestia ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
Not even aggressive for the right nearly the same reasons?
Reply
+23
#1 - trumpotakudesu (12/10/2015) [-]
Of course Trump was right.
Reply
+2
User avatar #44 to #1 - mrwalkerfour ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
>taking the daily mail as a factual unbiased newspaper

the daily mail owned by news corp. which also owns fox new. news dorp is owned by the jewish family the murdochs
Reply
-1
User avatar #48 to #44 - factual ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
it's a fact
Reply
+3
User avatar #40 - mrwalkerfour ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
the daily mail is the fox news of british news papers so take what they publish with a healthy dose of scepticism.

they always say parts of london, what parts? point out the areas so we can look and see if what your saying is true or ********


there are no go areas in london, but not because muslims. because gang crime is prevelent which is mostly the impoverished. and thats the same with any big city
Reply
0
#50 to #40 - scruffyguy (12/11/2015) [-]
Op posted two links
Reply
+1
User avatar #51 to #50 - mrwalkerfour ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
the second one? katie hopkins?

i figured shes not worth mentioning but if you insist she is the worst human being in british media at the moment

she thinks people with common names are scum
she thinks parents who give geographical names to children are scum, but her kids name is INDIA. which she states is not a geographical location.

she thinks lower class people are al lscum and she thinks disabled people should be culled (to her working class is also lower class) and just generally a ****** human being
Reply
0
#53 to #51 - scruffyguy (12/11/2015) [-]
o fuq dam lol. I guess those are ****** sources. I swear I remember reading about some muslim woman who reported how the muslims she lived around lived by shariah and treated women like **** . Doesnt count because I cant link source.
Reply
0
User avatar #54 to #53 - mrwalkerfour ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
she is the stereotypical upperclass snob. she pisses me off jsut seeing her face shes juse vile. a vile human being in all manner of speaking. she makes me ashamed to be from the same nation as her
Reply
0
User avatar #52 to #51 - mrwalkerfour ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
she maeks donald trump look PC with the shti she coems out with
Reply
+6
User avatar #10 - CALVINoMysyca (12/10/2015) [-]
TBH, I've never met a radical muslim, ever, I've been in London for 4 years and Muslim neighbours are 10 times better than almost sub human benefits Britbongs, I have a list of sorts in my head of people i've lived next door to and whom I prefer, Bear in mind I am a piss poor student and can't really live in nice places.


God tier:
1.German Speakers: I am German 9/10 we will always get along

2.Scandinavians: Speak Decent Norwegian/Swedish will usually get along

3.2nd/3rd Gen Muslim English Families: Usually Bring me food once befriended, aren't really offended if I bring them Christmas Cards along with German Seasonal treats for their kiddos.

4.Scots/Irish, Share booze, nuff said,


Okay Tier:
1.Chinese, are quiet keep themselves to themselves, don't say hi.

2.Nigerians, Can't understand their sense of humour and have to awkwardly laugh along.

3.Benefits British people. Scum but can be friendly, Pretty Racist.

**** Tier:

1.Russians

2.Weed addicted Britbong people

3.1st Gen Mudslimes, I might as well be hearing "ALLAHU ACKBAR" from all I can hear from their houses,

4.Clown Car houses, Usually Gypsie Romanians,

"How many people can I fit into a ******* 3 bedroom tiny britbong house?"

1 person per Planck Distance apparently.
Reply
-1
#12 to #10 - chugwug (12/10/2015) [-]
Do you think you live in the Muslim ghettos described in the articles?

Either way I don't see the relevance of your ranking system for neighbour ethnicities, but thanks for keeping us updated.
Reply
+1
User avatar #13 to #12 - CALVINoMysyca (12/10/2015) [-]
Those Ghettos just don't exist man, Places like White Chapel are pretty muslim dominated but that's only because they're **** holes and cheap to live in.

I want to get out of London but it's really only because it's getting more expensive to live here while not offering much in return for the price. The City is dead full of rich ***** who produce no culture of their own.

Places that used to be edgy and rebellious have become expensive because of it.



Mudslimes aren't really a worry anymore tbh.
Reply
0
#14 to #13 - chugwug (12/10/2015) [-]
How about Tower Hamlets? I suppose the question is: are there places in the UK where there are large densities of Muslims living and where radical imams preach? And if so are these communities susceptible to extremism and beyong the reach of British law?

I think the answer to both of these questions is unfortunately yes.

The long-standing vogue is that we cannot discuss the problem of Islamism without being accused of racism. Regardless of what people think of Trump, he is not a million miles away from the truth when he talks of Muslim ghettoes in Britain where police have no influence. This is a problem because it heralds Sharia law and the propagation of home grown terrorism on British soil. I don't know how it can be stopped. The seeds are sown.
Reply
+2
User avatar #16 to #14 - CALVINoMysyca (12/10/2015) [-]
Tower hamlets if going to be demolished for new luxury flats soon anyway fam, don't ******* worry about that ****

The seeds may be sewn yeah, but what people tend to forget is that the British, Germans,French and hell even the Swedes can turn and become imperial nations once more, we are Europeans, we have history, we have pride we have power deep within us.


Our generosity will have it's limits someday, and when it reaches that limit, may the gods have mercy.

Deus Vult,

Tor mit uns,


and
Dolce et decorum est whatever the **** the rest of it is.
Reply
0
User avatar #45 to #14 - mrwalkerfour ONLINE (12/11/2015) [-]
most if not all islamic centres are in cooperation with british intelligence and often are the first people to report signs of extremsit behaviour among their "flock" the british police service owe alot to the imams and other islamic officials for helping them prevent potential terror attacks. they achknowledge that terrorr attacks only harm the muslim population by demonizing muslims and they know that from demonization comes backlash. by demonising all muslims you make it more likely that they will turn to extremsit ideologies.

and trust me the police do alot of stuff behind clsoed doors when it comes to keeping an eye on mosques and muslim dominated areas. they dont tell you everything they do but they do alot more than you think.
Reply
+4
User avatar #25 - slapchoppin (12/11/2015) [-]
of course Europe is gonna start agreeing with him

he's trying to prevent whats happening there
Reply
+4
User avatar #5 - normiefag (12/10/2015) [-]
It is kinda right tho...I don't know if it's still like it or if it was as bad as they said, but my brothers were chased out of quite a few areas by muslims just when walking down there
Reply
+2
#31 - anon (12/11/2015) [-]
whats hard to believe? there are "no-go" areas in Detroit Michigan, where the police don't actively patrol and if you are white you will die.
Reply
+7
#4 - voltkills ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]
>5 random police officers and katie hopkins say somthing
LOL K MUST B TRUE DEN
Reply
+3
#6 to #4 - anon (12/10/2015) [-]
If cops even if it WAS just 5 say that an area is too dangerous to go then maybe it's really ******* dangerous. The only reason they are saying that is because they probably aren't allowed to go there for their own safety. The city I lived in had a part of town that cops wouldn't even respond to. Maybe sometimes it's racism, sometimes it's true.
Reply
0
#22 to #6 - anon (12/11/2015) [-]
Katie Hopkins is literally retarded. Trust me, everyone in the UK is ******* baffled that Trump is doing well. It seems like a massive inside joke.
Reply
+4
#8 - anon (12/10/2015) [-]
Thank you liberals
Reply
+1
#19 - csgtsheep (12/11/2015) [-]
This was effectively brought in in a similar fashion to how we tend to be about health and safety. If it could kill you, Just don't ******* do it unless you have to.

Because two cunts decided to go out and target a soldier for being a soldier and wearing a help for heroes A charity for wounded vets over here shirt they've implimented this in order to effectively combat the policemen being randomly targeted until they're on the job with the "kit" I say that loosely because a faulty taser and pepper spray doesn't quite cut it in my book. to protect themselves against such attacks. They can't stop members of the public from doing what they want but they can damn well try and enforce it onto government employees.

I doubt wholeheartedly any policeman in London would tell you theres "no go areas" because they're really not that scared of people. If they were they wouldn't do the job they've had to earn a place in.
Reply
+1
#11 - anon (12/10/2015) [-]
And what ? One policeman gives his political poinion, everybody loses their mind.
Reply
+1
#21 to #11 - doctersmiles (12/11/2015) [-]
when a police officers opinion is actually fact, every dead libtard will roll in there ecofriendly biodegradable grave
Reply
0
#3 - whatwhen (12/10/2015) [-]
**whatwhen used "*roll picture*"**
**whatwhen rolled image** you know what would be funny? if he actually was elected. so all of you americunts go and vote for him or dont vote at all
Reply
0
User avatar #17 to #3 - samoaspider ONLINE (12/10/2015) [-]
I'm no american but I've heard that he doesn't want to become president and is doing that all for ***** n giggles. He is in a point of no return so he atleast tries to look like he is atleast trying to become the president
Reply
-1
#7 - anon (12/10/2015) [-]
Everyone ***** on trump but numbers don't lie, it would help America. I wish where I lived in Germany did this **** . I'm in the process of selling my home and moving because everything has gone to **** here.
Reply
0
#60 - auesis (12/11/2015) [-]
The day I trust a source by Katie "India is not a location" Hopkins is the day I roast in hell.
Reply
0
#59 - robuntu (12/11/2015) [-]
I'm gonna LoL so hard when Trump wins. The news will become like reality TV. It'll be great entertainment.

Reply
0
#57 - DrOctoganapus (12/11/2015) [-]
We must keep believing in him
12>
[ 63 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)