Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(55):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
55 comments displayed.
User avatar #3 - sanitarysan ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
is that the woman who lied to sargon of akkad on his stream?
User avatar #4 to #3 - jayszzzz (01/09/2016) [-]
Yep
#5 to #3 - kurtr (01/10/2016) [-]
Can you elaborate?
User avatar #6 to #5 - sanitarysan ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
during this debate Kate Brooks had a very impassioned argument against this man and it was very social justicy, when her part of the debate went viral many people contested her argument which lead to her claiming that they were not actually her views and demanding people take down these videos refuting her her argument. sargon invited her on a stream to explain her side of the story but afterwords evidence came out that it was ******** .
User avatar #9 to #6 - tenfinnvo [OP](01/10/2016) [-]
Debate link when
User avatar #10 to #9 - sanitarysan ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
i think sargon deleted his original video, it would be annoying to find the clips.
anyway this is her part of the debate, also worthy of note is the quote that she read is a complete fabrication. [TW: MIRROR] Kate Brooks  | Freedom of Speech and Right to Offend | Opposition
#11 to #10 - tenfinnvo [OP](01/10/2016) [-]
That voice is so ******* obnoxious it's disgusting.
#15 to #11 - Seanxone (01/10/2016) [-]
Literally everyone looks confused at her
User avatar #12 to #11 - sanitarysan ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
a bit long, but this is the stream sargon hosted after he took down the video he made of her debate. as far as i know he still believes her every word in this interview.
User avatar #13 to #12 - sanitarysan ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Discussing Freedom of Speech and Censorship with Kate Brooks
0
#50 to #13 - insanefreak has deleted their comment [-]
#41 to #13 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
This is actually true for competitive debating, but for the formal debates (i.e. like the one in the video), they select people quite a long time in advance.

Source: I'm an Oxford Union member.
#16 to #10 - Seanxone (01/10/2016) [-]
This video is a goldmine for reaction pics
User avatar #17 to #10 - amoryquinn ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
HOT ASIAN CHICK BLEW HER THE **** OUT
#44 to #17 - carrotpotato (01/10/2016) [-]
What does she say? I can't make it out
#46 to #44 - sambadionhia (01/10/2016) [-]
It's something along the lines:

"Is it true that: If person A has an opinion and Person B disagrees with it, then person A is not allowed to have that opinion."
User avatar #24 to #17 - rongdisk (01/10/2016) [-]
huh cant find anything like that? time stamp?
#29 to #24 - amoryquinn ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
2:40, bruv.
#35 to #29 - rongdisk (01/10/2016) [-]
******* WRECKED OH MAN
0
#34 to #29 - thedankmemer has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #33 to #10 - crazyanimal (01/10/2016) [-]
That conclusion sentence is made me spit my drink out and cough uncontrollably. "We want freedom of speech, but we're gonna have to shut these guys up for awhile"
User avatar #52 to #10 - mrwalkerfour (01/10/2016) [-]
she literally has no idea what shes talking about. shes talking out of anger not logic. the man who spoke did so with logic with thought and revision shes just blurting out the first thing that pops into her special snowflake head.

MUH M-M-M-MUH ISLAM IS PROGRESSIVE....UHH UHUHHHHH DIFFERENCE OF OPINION MEANS YOU CANT HURT MUH FEELIGNS....UUGHGHGHGHH NUH NO CHINESE GIRL YOU CANT DISAGREE WITH ME YOU ARE OPPRESSED YOU NEED MY WHITE SELF TO HELP YOU
#51 to #10 - insanefreak (01/10/2016) [-]
******* hell man, when the Asian chick speaks up and she lets her because she sees it's a woman, only to get utter, utter REKT, it's amazing.
"ABSOLUTELY NOT" while trying to wave it away desperately is... amazing. Just plain amazing. Nobody in the room seems to take her very serious anymore. I mean, in her voice it's obvious that it's laden with damn near hysterical emotions that will really crush any point you're trying to make because it takes away every bit of professionalism that surrounds you.
User avatar #43 to #10 - snaikravdra (01/10/2016) [-]
at 2:40 when she gets wrecked

O P I N I O N A T E D
P
I
N
I
O
N
A
T
E
D
#42 to #10 - hagenius (01/10/2016) [-]
> Blatantly ignores male responses while calling on women
> Looks angry when she says something contrary to her points
#25 - iamchicken (01/10/2016) [-]
"Question."

"No."
User avatar #2 - praemium (01/09/2016) [-]
Hitchens - free speech Fine enough and I absolutely agree, but I don't think anyone could beat the Hitch at it.
User avatar #47 to #2 - robertolee (01/10/2016) [-]
Wrong Hitchens, t'was Peter Hitchens there, Christopher died a while ago.
#1 - ohhh (01/09/2016) [-]
"no"
User avatar #27 to #1 - imofcnotharveydent (01/10/2016) [-]
why do people like this **** ? am I getting to old?
#31 to #27 - assholy (01/10/2016) [-]
It's a way to parody what they hate "420, smoke weed everyday, 360 noscope, etc." Whatever a stereotypical 12 year old who plays call of duty likes, essentially , but in doing so, have become what they despise.

My dad used to ridicule my aunt's way of hanging up, so whenever she was around he would mimic her by repeating "goodbye" into the phone as he placed it back into the base. He keeps doing it now. It happens, dunno why.
User avatar #45 to #31 - lateday ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
I think it becomes a way to exaggerate something, keeping the basis and showing how ridicule something really is. People just keep doing the stuff out of habit. Memes are actually to "fit in". Because we totally get your cool story bro. Similar to how people who like others will imititate their mannerisms, whether they realize or not.
#7 - skumbaner (01/10/2016) [-]
... What's this about tits on a sun?
User avatar #53 to #7 - mrwalkerfour (01/10/2016) [-]
a newspaper in the UK, the page 3 traditionalyl has a topless woman pictured on it.

you can iamgine how that offends feminists.

i dont agree with the femenists on it, but the sun as a newspaper is pretty **** anyways, it lies alot about stuff for the sake of sensationalism.
User avatar #8 to #7 - tenfinnvo [OP](01/10/2016) [-]
It's a name of a journal.
User avatar #28 - ingloriousgamer (01/10/2016) [-]
the speech was very good. The audience?
>hears argument about how whites arnt wiser than Blacks but equal
>claps out of white guilt
#48 to #28 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
>claps out of white guilt
Or well, gee I don't know, maybe they aren't pathetic sub-human trash who have to be proud of their race because they have nothing else to be proud of. Maybe they do know how history played out and how it affects the socio-economic hierarchy of the world.
User avatar #30 to #28 - tenfinnvo [OP](01/10/2016) [-]
You can actually see bitchy looking faces being salty and not clapping
User avatar #36 to #28 - toosexyforyou (01/10/2016) [-]
White guilt? The point was that black people don't need fat white women protecting them, there's no guilt in clapping for that.
#26 - pjoach (01/10/2016) [-]
When you tell a bitch to sit down and listen to some reason, men **** themselves because you're the only one with balls to say it
User avatar #14 - ashtak (01/10/2016) [-]
Whats up with the 3 peeps behind the speaker? the ones on the elevated seats.
#38 to #14 - miasaki ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Their parents donated the most.

In all reality it's most likely the student body leaders like anon in >>#19 said. However, I don't doubt that money did not influence that in some way for at least one of em, especially at that tier of college/uni, whatever you wish to call it. I don't care enough to look into em, this is all assumption.
#23 to #14 - holmesc (01/10/2016) [-]
They're the rulers of Oxford.

They banned this man from oxford for being offensive after this speech and threw him into the dungeons that some call community college.
#19 to #14 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
Just a total guess here, but Id say they are the higher up student leaders (pres, vice pres, stuff like that)
#32 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
>freedom of speech
>question
>no

lol
User avatar #39 to #32 - blahblahblahblaaaa (01/10/2016) [-]
freedom of speech is being able to ask the question and the speaker being able to say no
User avatar #40 to #32 - commontroll (01/10/2016) [-]
In a debate you let the person speak, if they are okay with you having input then that's fine. But otherwise wait your turn.
User avatar #20 - skeletorexplains ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Funfact: According to a tweet (I believe?) The girl in the opposition doesn't actually believe the nonsense she says in these debates. She is "Forced to take the position for the sake of the debate" or something along those lines.

I gotta find that tweet, i heard about it on the amazing atheist because he tweeted him? or he seen a tweet stating it.
User avatar #21 to #20 - kanatana (01/10/2016) [-]
Mention me when you find it, this guy was straight savage and I need to see more on it.
User avatar #49 to #20 - mooproxy (01/10/2016) [-]
I'm pretty sure that came about after her segment got so many bad ratings on youtube, with commenters everywhere mocking her, that I think the Oxford debating channel removed her video.
User avatar #54 to #49 - skeletorexplains ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Oh? Where there ya go Kanatana
#18 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
GIF
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** be the future **** everything that breathes til it dies
#55 - mrhazzy (01/10/2016) [-]
" **** this cis white male scum."
User avatar #37 - fourfangedferret (01/10/2016) [-]
Excellent.
#22 - kanatana (01/10/2016) [-]
**kanatana used "*roll picture*"**
**kanatana rolled image** " **** your orthodoxies" shall be added to my personal list of rules.

Top Content in 24 Hours

No entries found.
 Friends (0)