Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(26):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
26 comments displayed.
#1 - plerp (01/02/2016) [-]
How fast will it go?
How fast will it go?
User avatar #2 to #1 - Tusura (01/02/2016) [-]
My guess is it will increase based on the voltage of the battery. In this case it's 1.2V-1.5V for a AA battery.

As for RPM of the mechanism, I have no clue. I don't know the calculation for it, and I can't remember anything from high school physics.

sciencexplain can you shed more light on this?

User avatar #4 to #2 - sciencexplain (01/02/2016) [-]
>>#1, Firstly, let's assume the resistance of the created circuit is a constant, it's most likely. Therefore, the voltage = current/resistance. To increase voltage, the current must increase or resistance must decrease, but as already stated, R is constant. Therefore, voltage increases with current, so to increase battery voltage would either mean increased current or decreased resistance. Either way, we'll ignore that, because internal resistance of cells and batteries is too complex for me to explain simply to you. Just acknowledge that, as the current/voltage increases or resistance decreases (very unlikely), the speed should theoretically increase.

The speed in RPM of this homopolar motor cannot be established easily. Depending on the charge of the battery, the strength (hate that word) of the motor due to it's current, etc. will alter the revolutions it makes. You can make one at home and time it, but as the chemical reaction in the battery fails, the speed will drop down with a weaker field. I can't actually give you an accurate value, unfortunately, there are just too many unknowns. Because this experiment has no practical use, nobody really cares for calculations for it, and I'm not going to try and make one to guess an average. It's easily done at home, best metal disc to use is neodymium if you're going to try. I'm happy to try and explain some other stuff, but this is just too vague for me.

It's far too late at night for me to re-read this **** . There's probably errors, but idgaf.
User avatar #9 to #4 - theism ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
Voltage is actually the product of current and resistance.
#10 to #9 - turtleshells ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
Wasn't it current squared times resistance?
User avatar #11 to #10 - theism ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
I'm fairly certain it's v = IR.
#12 to #11 - turtleshells ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
Oh, then what did I describe?
User avatar #13 to #12 - theism ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
Power.
#14 to #13 - turtleshells ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
Right, thanks.
have the two of spades
User avatar #21 to #9 - sciencexplain (01/03/2016) [-]
Oh ******* christ, why did I put that slash there? Just ignore that, I knew it was gonna be wrong somewhere. I know it's V=IR I SWEAR
User avatar #24 to #21 - theism ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
You also put resistance has to decrease, I think in your head you were thinking current.
User avatar #25 to #24 - sciencexplain (01/03/2016) [-]
Yeah, the forwardslash made me get it the wrong way round. Eh, whatever.
User avatar #26 to #25 - theism ONLINE (01/03/2016) [-]
It's all good.
#16 to #4 - iderpedintofj (01/03/2016) [-]
"strength (hate that word)"

Why not just call it what it is? (Torque)

All that's going to affect is its acceleration in RPM's though.
User avatar #22 to #16 - sciencexplain (01/03/2016) [-]
If I say torque, they'll probably end up saying "what's torque?" and I have to describe that to them too. Although it's basic, I just use the words that make most sense for the people reading it, I don't want to go into things like moments or **** like that to describe it.
#23 to #22 - iderpedintofj (01/03/2016) [-]
Yeah you're not wrong.
User avatar #6 to #4 - Tusura (01/02/2016) [-]
Thanks based sciencexplain.

Always there when we need you.
User avatar #7 to #6 - sciencexplain (01/02/2016) [-]
Sometimes I miss the comments... I'm a monster.
User avatar #3 to #2 - dutchfag (01/02/2016) [-]
I used to make these all the time when I was bored in shop,
Im not here to explain science stuff, just what I picked up from making these

Things that impact the speed are how charged the battery is, how strong the magnet is and the amount and type of wire you use.
It went fastest for me, with an AA, decent magnet and thin copper wire
User avatar #5 to #3 - sciencexplain (01/02/2016) [-]
If you consider doing it again, just bear in mind: Larger wire = Greater cross-sectional area, therefore more area to conduct and can support a larger battery/cell. Resistivity is a constant, but no wire is probably better than copper in terms of access and practicality.
User avatar #8 to #5 - Tusura (01/02/2016) [-]
I have vape wire. I was thinking about making one of these using 26 gauge Kanthal wire.

I don't have any copper wire sitting around, so it's all I've got to work with.
#19 - FFVIIPWNS (01/03/2016) [-]
GIF
*spinning intensefies*
User avatar #15 - notenoughtortillas (01/03/2016) [-]
>use battery thing to spin metal thing
>use spinny thing to power another battery
>new battery has spinny metal thing on it
infinite energy
User avatar #17 to #15 - misternobodie [OP](01/03/2016) [-]
There are lots of videos on YT like:
'' Governents dont want you to know this: Source of infinite energy ! ''
or
'' Free energy revealed: how to **** power companies ! ''
Theyre all with some magnets and what you talked about, and they seem to work too. Check em out. funnily theyre done with computer fans
User avatar #20 - ILoveFurries (01/03/2016) [-]
Well that would explain it. Got bored one day and tried recreating this. Let it sit there for a minute or so without it spinning so I went to take the paperclip off and burned my fingers.

Turns out I forgot the magnet part.
User avatar #18 - Sewallman (01/03/2016) [-]
Electromagnetic cucks think this is cool? Try succesfully building a rotor system that works on permanent magnets.

It's not impossible, but 90% of the people who try end up failing.
 Friends (0)