Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(113):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 113 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
108 comments displayed.
User avatar #4 - tweda (15 hours ago) [-]
Not gonna lie, it took me a minute or two to realize you meant native americans and not indians OP.
#96 to #4 - slias (7 hours ago) [-]
Well, they got ****** by colonisation too.
Good times.
User avatar #69 to #4 - lazycloud (8 hours ago) [-]
They can't invade scary India. There is boo in the loo
User avatar #11 to #4 - willindor (13 hours ago) [-]
I wonder if the Native Americans and toilets go along
User avatar #30 to #11 - FeeFieFoe (11 hours ago) [-]
We do, and i've never actually once in my life seen a white person wash their hands after using a public restroom. So, ya'll are one to talk.
User avatar #54 to #30 - bladeboy (9 hours ago) [-]
You've never seen a white person wash their hands and I've never seen a sober native, we both have our problems.
User avatar #57 to #54 - FeeFieFoe (9 hours ago) [-]
lol Im actually not even attacking white people or defending india indians, im just sayin, its weird how you guys make fun of them for not poopin in toilets yet I've never seen a white guy wash his hands. Even after they leave the smelliest poo i've ever not wanted to smell, they casually walk out and shake other white guys hands and put their hands all over food in the store or put their hands all over the condiments in a resturant place and what not. And yes I spend over $1000 a month on booze, I am not a very hopeful model of the native american people.
User avatar #1 - machiavellianhumor (01/11/2016) [-]
oh god i love memes
#52 to #1 - crlmsonhazard (9 hours ago) [-]
Feels bad when a filthy rapist spic with an 80 IQ who can't speak english can get a job supporting a family of six, when I can't even work at McDonald's
#60 to #52 - anon (9 hours ago) [-]
Lemme put it this way. If an immigrant who doesn't even speak English as their first language is sooner hired at McDonald's than YOU- It means you are probably autistic or retarded.
User avatar #56 to #52 - machiavellianhumor (9 hours ago) [-]
mcdonalds won't hire people too experienced or smart cause they can ask for raises. if a nontalented person asks for a raise they can be replaced easily
User avatar #64 to #56 - shoryuken (8 hours ago) [-]
yeah man, I did a Mcdonalds test when I applied
the test is designed to look for idiots/ weak people

Don't answer with a logical answer ,go full retard and you're sure to get the job
User avatar #65 to #64 - machiavellianhumor (8 hours ago) [-]
idk about retarded, maybe robotic or something is the word.
User avatar #83 to #56 - ronyx (7 hours ago) [-]
Maybe because actual smart people don't end up working at mcdonalds you know?
User avatar #97 to #83 - machiavellianhumor (6 hours ago) [-]
well if you're talking about adults. im talking about just a highschool or college student maybe just out of college. but if you're like a full adult they don't want you to be too smart rocking the boat
User avatar #99 to #97 - ronyx (6 hours ago) [-]
High School kids are too unreliable and nobody wants them. College kids are OK, just don't act like you're going to ask for a 15 hr raise, they want people that won't make a fuss and just do their job and ask nothing. It would be really crazy if all of mcdonalds were run by illegals don't you think?
User avatar #58 to #56 - crlmsonhazard (9 hours ago) [-]
So, basically, if I want work I have to pretend to be a retard. I already do that on Funnyjunk, I don't wanna do it real life also.
#73 to #58 - bronywiseman ONLINE (8 hours ago) [-]
Aww, don't sell yourself so short!
You're not pretending to be a retard, now it's called "Experimenting".
User avatar #61 to #58 - machiavellianhumor (9 hours ago) [-]
if you want a mcdonalds job you have to competently stupid in a way. it's hard to explain. you should have a nice personality and stuff though. dont appear too timid. you'll be fine
User avatar #3 - izaya ONLINE (16 hours ago) [-]
illegal immigration =/= conquest
#35 to #3 - anon (10 hours ago) [-]
You sure about that? Illegal immigrants certainly do not seek to better the society they enter, they just want to help themselves. They aggregate in their own closed communities where they serve their own self-interest and try to expand, without giving much thought to how it hurts others. Squatting on land and using that feudal-age power to influence rule over everyone to match their ideal. A good example is France but it is happening all over the place, America included. Unintended or sneaky conquest is still conquest.
#68 to #35 - godofhorizons (8 hours ago) [-]
Get off your ******* high horse. You are describing 99% of anybody anywhere.
#82 to #35 - anonmynous (7 hours ago) [-]
and what have you done to help your own society that didn't benefit yourself? Our society works in such a way that getting an education and a good job does benefit society as a whole and that's all immigrants want while also escaping the poverty and death that surrounds their lives in their home countries. Silicon valley was founded by mexican immigrants.
User avatar #26 to #3 - leorio (11 hours ago) [-]
It would be better if they started killing us with old world viruses?
#43 to #26 - NutHut (9 hours ago) [-]
Hey man....keep it up
User avatar #33 to #26 - slapchoppin (10 hours ago) [-]
because colonial americans knew all about how viruses work right?
#37 to #33 - malifauxdeux (10 hours ago) [-]
Yes actually. They used small-pox infected blankets as bio weapons.
#74 to #37 - mindyourownbusines (8 hours ago) [-]
Really? People are still buying this? From what I remember there was one instance where Europeans openly used disease as a bio-weapon and it affected a very small percentage of one tribe. Most deaths had nothing to do with intentionally spread diseases.
User avatar #75 to #74 - opticmonkey (8 hours ago) [-]
Why do you sound like you're disagreeing with him? You're saying the same thing
#77 to #75 - mindyourownbusines (7 hours ago) [-]
I don't entirely disagree with him. I just disagree with the implication people usually draw that it was a major plot on the part of Europeans to kill off all the natives by spreading disease. In reality, it was nowhere near as widespread as people make on. And I doubt, most colonial Americans knew the viruses were going to kill off the native people when they arrived, as was implied by the context. As I said, I think there was only one or two instances where Europeans intentionally used disease to harm natives.
User avatar #5 to #3 - youregaylol (14 hours ago) [-]
You're right, it's only conquest when whites do it.
User avatar #8 to #5 - highkingtorygg (14 hours ago) [-]
its only conquest when they conquer
FTFY
User avatar #18 to #8 - youregaylol (12 hours ago) [-]
Go to south Texas and tell me that those towns aren't mexico in all but name. Heck, go to east Texas and find the same thing.

Liberals only care about land grabs when white people do it. Fact.
#45 to #18 - anon (9 hours ago) [-]
Yeeeeaaahhh... about that.
User avatar #46 to #45 - youregaylol (9 hours ago) [-]
The 60's called, they want their bleeding heart cause of the month back.
#47 to #46 - anon (9 hours ago) [-]
>bleeding heart

Aha! So it IS liberals who care about this strictly Asian land grab!
User avatar #49 to #47 - youregaylol (9 hours ago) [-]
Baby boomer liberals. For like a month. Ask any beardleg at a Cuckie Panders rally what they think of Tibet and they'll say they love their coffee.
#50 to #49 - anon (9 hours ago) [-]
>clear counterexample
>doesn't count, doesn't fit the narrow criteria I just invented to support my conviction that all liberal causes are racist against whites

I like you. You fahny guy.
#53 to #50 - youregaylol (9 hours ago) [-]
>"clear counter example"
>based on liberals from 50 years ago

I know you're likely not that bright, but when I say "liberals" I'm referring to current liberals, not every person who has called themselves a liberal in history, you ******* retard.

Next you'll be trying to argue that Liberals don't believe in gay marriage because classical liberals didn't, dummy.
#55 to #53 - anon (9 hours ago) [-]
User avatar #62 to #55 - youregaylol (9 hours ago) [-]
This just in, the Dali Lama is an american liberal.
User avatar #76 to #62 - opticmonkey (7 hours ago) [-]
Not only does your argument suck, but Tibet is literally still a prominent issue. Your whole ****** argument is based on wrong information
User avatar #79 to #76 - marinepenguin (7 hours ago) [-]
I live in America and I could ask the next 10 people about what they think about Tibet and China, and probably none of them would have a clue what was going on.

I never even heard of the issue until I was out of high school and I had to educate myself on the issue.
User avatar #78 to #76 - youregaylol (7 hours ago) [-]
Tibet is still a prominent issue among liberals in the US? Seriously?

Where do they find you morons, it's like you roam in packs.
#104 to #78 - vvthegreats (6 hours ago) [-]
My one question to you is this: Why are you still typing?
User avatar #105 to #104 - youregaylol (6 hours ago) [-]
Because I do what I want.
#106 to #105 - vvthegreats (6 hours ago) [-]
You may do what you want, but there is a clear-cut difference between what is beneficial and what is not.


Your incoherent typing is not. For anyone. Especially for the ones with a positive IQ, like me.
User avatar #108 to #106 - youregaylol (6 hours ago) [-]
That "positive IQ" apparently hasn't given you the ability to type like a normal human being.

"Your incoherent typing is not. For anyone. "

I mean what the **** is that.
User avatar #23 to #18 - highkingtorygg (12 hours ago) [-]
I agree, libs be biased

but it's not an organized conquering to our knowledge
#39 to #18 - malifauxdeux (10 hours ago) [-]
That's not conquering ******* . That's like saying the Irish conquered Boston.
User avatar #40 to #39 - youregaylol (9 hours ago) [-]
If theres no assimilation, yes. You'd be hard pressed to find an Irish person who thinks Boston is a mini Ireland, but go into Pasadena, Texas and you won't be able to tell the difference from Mexico.
#42 to #40 - malifauxdeux (9 hours ago) [-]
Oh yeah, because it's not like the mass Irish immigration in to the U.S didn't happen over a century ago or anything. OH wait... And let's not forget all these other "conquerors" like the Quakers, Catholics, Italians, Chinese, Japanese, or any other group who came in mass to the U.S. But here, let me make this easy enough for you to understand the difference between "a bunch of people from a different country moving in to or staying in an area." You know, because Texas was filled with Mexicans before we conquered it.

Conquer-
1.to acquire by force of arms; win in war:
to conquer a foreign land.
2.to overcome by force; subdue:
to conquer an enemy
User avatar #44 to #42 - youregaylol (9 hours ago) [-]
Ah, reading comprehension isn't your strong suit. i'm sorry. You see when I mentioned "assimilation" that wasn't just a random assortment of letters. That means that the people assimilated into the country.

"You know, because Texas was filled with Mexicans before we conquered it. "
Who conquered it? Surely you don't mean the american immigrants turned mexican citizens. They were peaceful. They only became violent after they stopped being peaceful, ******** .

You're calling the americans conquerors because they immigrated to mexican land lawfully and took it over?

Why, that almost sounds like my argument.
#48 to #44 - malifauxdeux (9 hours ago) [-]
The Mexican American War~
A war between the U.S. and Mexico spanned the period from spring 1846 to fall 1847. The war was initiated by the United States and resulted in Mexico's defeat and the loss of approximately half of its national territory in the north. In the U.S. the war is termed the Mexican–American War, also known as the Mexican War, the U.S.–Mexican War or the Invasion of Mexico. Which led to...

Outnumbered militarily and with many of its large cities occupied, Mexico could not defend itself; the country was also faced with many internal divisions, including the Caste War of Yucatán. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed on February 2, 1848, by American diplomat Nicholas Trist and Mexican plenipotentiary representatives Luis G. Cuevas, Bernardo Couto, and Miguel Atristain, ended the war. The treaty gave the U.S. undisputed control of Texas, established the U.S.-Mexican border of the Rio Grande, and ceded to the United States the present-day states of California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, most of Arizona and Colorado, and parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Wyoming.

Areas gained by the U.S through the treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo colored in white.

Jesus Christ dude...

As per "assimilation" I don't think you understand how long it takes for entire cultures to assimilate, and you still don't have a clear understanding of the word "conquer" apparently if you still want to try to use that word to describe Mexicans living together in a certain area.
User avatar #51 to #48 - youregaylol (9 hours ago) [-]
Lol, you're trying lecture me about history yet you can't go 10 years back to the ******* TEXAS REVOLUTION. You know, the war not involving the US government and which ended in the Republic of Texas in 1836? That war was fought by Mexican citizens, primarily American immigrants, but not the government of the USA.

Mexico lost it's lands to its own citizens. They went to war with the US after their former citizens decided to join the USA.

"Jesus Christ dude..." indeed. I love it when morons who have no idea what they're talking about try to educate their betters. It's just...perfect,

Yes, the mexicans who have existed in Texans since before the mass immigration of europe in the early 1900's and still haven't assimiliated are just more stubborn than the Irish who assimilated much quicker. It couldn' possibly have to with the social climate of todays america. Just those stubborn americans.

Ask Mexico if their former american immigrants weren't conquerors. You liberals are so cute.
User avatar #36 to #18 - ericzxvc (10 hours ago) [-]
So you're telling me every city that has a Chinatown has been "conquered"? A large group of people in a foreign country isn't "conquering" it just a people from the same culture bringing into their daily lives to enhance them.
Conquering is stealing land and calling it yours, driving people out, none of which is done by peaceful gatherings of immigrants who abide by all laws set in their host country. You can live in Chinatown, the laws are the same in Chinatown, there is no "conquering" being done.
User avatar #41 to #36 - youregaylol (9 hours ago) [-]
"A large group of people in a foreign country isn't "conquering" it just a people from the same culture bringing into their daily lives to enhance them. "

Oy Vey, some cultural enrichments afoot.

Tell that to the Mexicans who lost Texas to "peaceful immigrants.",at least until the immigrants decided to not be so peaceful anymore.

Tell that to the current Texans who are losing their cities now. You don't know a thing about how immigration can easily turn into conquest.
User avatar #17 to #3 - kilotech (12 hours ago) [-]
the French were very peaceful to the natives yet look who lives in Canada now
User avatar #31 to #17 - greyhoundfd (11 hours ago) [-]
Yeah, the British literally everywhere except Quebec. Canada hasn't been French since the French and Indian War.
User avatar #6 to #3 - WutsAtroll (14 hours ago) [-]
but it can lead to conquest eventually. Like with the Native Americans/Canadians
#12 to #3 - failflyer (13 hours ago) [-]
Tell that to Mexico and Texas.
User avatar #38 to #12 - mikeypooh (10 hours ago) [-]
spain had the mexican land, they toook it from the aztecs and mayans
#10 - anon (13 hours ago) [-]
They're not comparable situations.
User avatar #22 - mrwalkerfour ONLINE (12 hours ago) [-]
indians didnt die because of illegal immigration though. they died because they came into contact with a more powerful people and with foriegn disease which decimated their numbers. it wasnt just because some people turned up that their entire race collapsed. alot of otehr **** had to happen.

when illegal mexicans are more technologically advanced, better educated, armed and supplied and carry diseases that US citizens arent immune to. then you can compare to the indians

#67 to #22 - anon (8 hours ago) [-]
If you really think that the colonization of America was a stronger people conquering a weaker people, you need to take a history course.
#29 to #22 - scruffyguy (11 hours ago) [-]
The Indians had the same tech as the White man (guns, horses). The Indians' population rebounded after being decimated by disease. They lost to the White man because they couldn't unify to fight them off.
#113 to #29 - anon (5 hours ago) [-]
Truth; millions of native americans were wiped indirectly out from the initial burst of Columbus' escapades and what followed down south. Rampant sickness and ecological devastation spread up the East Coast like wildfire due to Spanish presence in Florida, in particular.

The result was that when the English began to settle in New England they were in effect inhabiting the ruins of a once prosperous and expansive society of people. I mean consider the spread of the Black Death: what served as a vector in its epidemic were rodent populations stowed on ships that were conducting trade. It follows then that in order for disease to spread so thoroughly across North America there must have been extensive trade lines or at a bare minimum interactions between all different kinds of civilizations.
User avatar #24 - severepwner (12 hours ago) [-]
Are we forgetting illegal immigration literally has illegal in the name?
#85 to #24 - Jowi (7 hours ago) [-]
But it also has legal in the name too....
#88 to #66 - Jowi (7 hours ago) [-]
You're an idiot if you can't distinguish an invasive force that pushes out the natives and takes their land from a group who come peacefully to cohabit the same land as the natives.

Not saying I'm pro legal, I'm just anti-idiocy
#89 to #88 - Jowi (7 hours ago) [-]
Pro illegal* sorry
#13 - walmartysnextghost (13 hours ago) [-]
I have a long rant associated with the easiest answer is they don't pay income taxes but still get to enjoy the benefits that taxes pay for.
User avatar #19 to #13 - rockamekishiko (12 hours ago) [-]
no one should have to pay income taxes. In any case, they still pay every other kind of tax
#28 to #13 - recoveryone (11 hours ago) [-]
Eh, only argument I'd make is "What is there to debate about illegal immigrants? They're here illegally." Illegal actions have consequences...
#70 to #13 - godofhorizons (8 hours ago) [-]
It's actually the complete opposite. Illegal immigrants pay into social security, state taxes, and sales tax, but don't get benefits of the social security.
www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/04/16/Study-Finds-Illegal-Immigrants-Pay-118B-Taxes
#95 to #70 - walmartysnextghost (7 hours ago) [-]
what this says is they pay taxes, but would contribute more if they could do it legally. I don't see anything about paying into social security, probably because they deduct it from your paycheck, and if you're an undocumented worker there's not a system in place for you to pay taxes into. If you're paying income tax and social security you have a social security number because you're somewhere along the path to citizenship or have a green card
User avatar #100 to #95 - ronyx (6 hours ago) [-]
I don't see why they would need to pay into SS if they're not going to rip the benefits of SS. They can't retire when they're 75 unless they are citizens, the way things are going, they will never have legal status because politicians keep using the "immigration reform" just to get votes (from both sides) and never do anything about it. Mainly because on the next election they can reuse the "immigration reform" and get more votes.

Either way SS i believe has a deficit and it's expected to get worse as the baby boomers start to retire. Too many americans are retiring and not many are contributing to SS. The solution? legalize iillegals so they can pay into SS. If im not wrong there have been estimates that illegals could solve the SS crisis by introducing a young workforce who will pay into SS until the baby boomers pass away.

Still SS can't last much longer the way it is now, they should just get rid of it and educate people on planning for their own retirements. Also, the money you get from SS is very little to begin with, if you retire earlier than 75 it's basically spare change. I have met many people living just on SS and they live in crappy conditions, that's why you see many old farts working part times because SS just isn't enough.

SS is **** , can't work no more.
User avatar #81 to #13 - ronyx (7 hours ago) [-]
Most actually pay taxes, look it up yourself instead of being an ignorant ******* .
#94 to #81 - walmartysnextghost (7 hours ago) [-]
There isn't even a system in place for illegal employment to pay income tax. If you're paying income taxes you have a work visa and aren't illegal
User avatar #98 to #94 - ronyx (6 hours ago) [-]
Look up ITIN number on the IRS website or google if you like.
User avatar #16 to #13 - thebluedream (13 hours ago) [-]
Same here, people dont seem to understand the hatred towards illegals is not "the racisms" but rather they can come here and like the jokes say take our jobs because they can work for cheap. They also dont pay taxes like you and most people say "well they pay sales tax on the things they buy" sales tax aint **** . Another argument is "They dont get paid as much as you so quit whining" No they make more because even though they get paid less they dont pay taxes so they get more in the end. Finally, the coup DE gra of it all is they get reap the benefits of being a tax payer despite not being one.

To top it all of Obama has made another executive order that allows graduate from foreign countries to get insta work visas. So now we have to compete with cheap college grads. Going to school in india or mexico is so cheap you can have doctors who work for half the current wages because they dont have insane loans to pay off.
User avatar #103 to #16 - ronyx (6 hours ago) [-]
So how come nobody is up in arms about corporations like Nike or Apple among thousands others outsourcing jobs to the east? Literally millions of jobs are outsourced and everyone blames the illegals. Most also do pay taxes, refer to my comment up or look up ITIN number on the IRS website. And about the college graduates it just sounds like whining from you.

You can graduate without getting loans you know? even if you're poor as **** (hell it's easier if you're poor) you can get your career without loans. Only idiots or dumb people get loans to finish their career. Many of my friends had to work 2 jobs to pay for their careers and they owed 0 money when they graduated.

Stop being entitled and work for your future, many doit and many have done so already.
User avatar #107 to #103 - thebluedream (6 hours ago) [-]
1. I had no loans, I used scholarships and grants to pay for school did not owe dime.
2.Outsourcing is a large part of the problem but to say illegals play no part in it is dumb
3.I have a career, so I got work but again ignoring the issues facing the rest of our country is dumb as well, and it is not about being entitled but rather the fact that it is easier for a non-citizen to get jobs than the natives.
User avatar #109 to #107 - ronyx (6 hours ago) [-]
So stop whining and trying to defend the retards taking out loans who now owe the government billions of dollars and want it all forgiven. I really don't care if illegals have it easier (which they don't) or if Americans have it easier. This is America and hard work will make you rich, anyone who wants a handout can **** off.

People are dumb enough to let illegals "steal" their jobs, then they didn't deserve it to begin with.

I don't see an illegal marching in the operating room any time soon to perform a surgery.
User avatar #20 to #16 - rockamekishiko (12 hours ago) [-]
I'd say, you pay more in sales tax, than income tax, especially if you don't earn that much which i doubt illegal immigrants do. In fact, most of them earn very little, comparatively, which would grant them tax returns but a lot of them don't claim them.
User avatar #25 to #20 - darknak ONLINE (12 hours ago) [-]
don't claim them? please, at least here, immigrant know exactly how our system works. heck, they use it better than us
#90 - pyrusd (7 hours ago) [-]
I'll just give my opinion, don't know if anyone agrees with me.

I am against illegal immigration.

With that, I am against ILLEGAL immigration. If you want to come here legally, come on over. But, if you don't want to, then don't come here. Because along with the illegal part comes an attitude. That attitude is often of non-assimilation. For example, not speaking English or waving your previous country's flag around. When you do that, you're admitting to us that you don't want to be here and we don't want you here either.

If you want to be here, live here, work here, be on our side and be on our TEAM. Then by all means come here. But more often than not, you don't actually want to be here. You're an opportunist and that's it. You are taking advantage of us and our good graces just to hold allegiance to your home country and to your people. Which is fine, but do that in your country....with your people.

My country is for me and my people. REGARDLESS of where they come from. We come together to be ONE people in ONE nation under ONE flag. We do not have the room nor patience to set up my way and your way in my country. It is to be OUR way, not both yours and mine. We are to have our ways together. If you want to do things your way, do it in your country, not mine.
#112 to #90 - anon (5 hours ago) [-]
Nothing wrong with waving the flag of your home county. You don't have to come here and root for the USA (or wherever, it's just where I live) when we duke it out at international events, and you can always be a part of that country.

But yeah, you are if our house, so if you're going to live here, you'd better try to fit in, learn the rules, and not disrespect us for not being your country. That's the point.
User avatar #84 - letting (7 hours ago) [-]
Illegal immigration is bad.

Completely closing our borders to people in need is also bad. *cough*Wall of Trump *cough*

A nice balance would be good, that allowed people to enter the U.S. legally, and not get denied for ******** reasons again and again. I've heard of people from places in Europe even that had to wait years just to get a green card.

Immigrants built this country. Quite literally, unless you're Native American, you or somebody in your ancestry immigrated here.
User avatar #7 - sirkanesixtytwo (14 hours ago) [-]
Mebeh because illegal immigration is ******* ILLEGAL.
#14 to #7 - walmartysnextghost (13 hours ago) [-]
I know its just a bug but I took the time to do this because it's how I feel about your comment
#34 - anon (10 hours ago) [-]
The simple answer is "because it's illegal". Let's quick making out like the problem is the immigration part that is the problem. It's not. It's the illegal part. I have no problem with people who come here legally. The USA has bent over backwards to make it easier to become a citizen and tons of people still choose to come here illegally. Why? So they don't have to pay taxes and follow other laws.
#80 - ronyx (7 hours ago) [-]
I was having a good time browsing funny **** and then i stumble on this piece of political **** . This is exactly why people are leaving FJ, nothing but neckbeards trying to make this the next pol.
#87 to #80 - anon (7 hours ago) [-]
"people are leaving fj because fj has opinions i dont like"
User avatar #93 to #87 - ronyx (7 hours ago) [-]
Oh yea, look how FJ loves this piece of **** content. 1 single page of comments and most of them are a circle jerk between a couple of neckbeards. ******* retard.
#110 to #93 - anon (6 hours ago) [-]
Cry about it.
User avatar #92 to #80 - CrowbarNinja (7 hours ago) [-]
Yeah, i've been getting sick of how much garbage is on the front page nowadays. It used to be overused memes and reposts, now its just reposts and political tripe.
User avatar #63 - bakinboy (8 hours ago) [-]
the only way to kill a cuck is to let them cuck themselves to death
User avatar #101 to #63 - garymotherfingoak (6 hours ago) [-]
has cuck gotten to the point where it just means "i dont like this thing", like cancerous and autistic
User avatar #91 - srskate (7 hours ago) [-]
Like, instead of picking a legit reason, this is what you go with?
#72 - kellorkleft (8 hours ago) [-]
Admin wonders why less people visit FJ every day? I imagine idiots like the OP posting their idiotic 14 year-old political opinions to initiate one of many daily circle jerks on a comedy-based sharing site may be a pretty big contributor.
User avatar #86 to #72 - youregaylol (7 hours ago) [-]
"people are leaving fj because fj has opinions i dont like"
User avatar #9 - carlonord (14 hours ago) [-]
The Rape of Europe
User avatar #71 - whiteoverblue (8 hours ago) [-]
Because of New Year's at Cologne and Hamburg in Germany
#21 - anon (12 hours ago) [-]
that is the dumbest argument I have ever heard. Its not like Illegal immigrants come here with superior technology and deadly deceases, while we've never heard of them.

Dumb **** .
[ 113 comments ]
Leave a comment

Top Content in 24 Hours

No entries found.
 Friends (0)