they got casinos
Tll/
...
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
96 comments displayed.
#52 to #1
-
crlmsonhazard (2 hours ago) [-] 
Feels bad when a filthy rapist spic with an 80 IQ who can't speak english can get a job supporting a family of six, when I can't even work at McDonald's
#56 to #52
-
machiavellianhumor ONLINE (2 hours ago) [-] mcdonalds won't hire people too experienced or smart cause they can ask for raises. if a nontalented person asks for a raise they can be replaced easily
#65 to #64
-
machiavellianhumor ONLINE (2 hours ago) [-] idk about retarded, maybe robotic or something is the word.
#58 to #56
-
crlmsonhazard (2 hours ago) [-] So, basically, if I want work I have to pretend to be a retard. I already do that on Funnyjunk, I don't wanna do it real life also.
#73 to #58
-
bronywiseman ONLINE (1 hour ago) [-] Aww, don't sell yourself so short!
You're not pretending to be a retard, now it's called "Experimenting".
You're not pretending to be a retard, now it's called "Experimenting".
#61 to #58
-
machiavellianhumor ONLINE (2 hours ago) [-] if you want a mcdonalds job you have to competently stupid in a way. it's hard to explain. you should have a nice personality and stuff though. dont appear too timid. you'll be fine
#97 to #83
-
machiavellianhumor ONLINE (9 minutes ago) [-] well if you're talking about adults. im talking about just a highschool or college student maybe just out of college. but if you're like a full adult they don't want you to be too smart rocking the boat
#99 to #97
-
ronyx ONLINE (5 minutes ago) [-] High School kids are too unreliable and nobody wants them. College kids are OK, just don't act like you're going to ask for a 15 hr raise, they want people that won't make a fuss and just do their job and ask nothing. It would be really crazy if all of mcdonalds were run by illegals don't you think?
#4
-
tweda (9 hours ago) [-] Not gonna lie, it took me a minute or two to realize you meant native americans and not indians OP.
#57 to #54
-
FeeFieFoe ONLINE (2 hours ago) [-] lol Im actually not even attacking white people or defending india indians, im just sayin, its weird how you guys make fun of them for not poopin in toilets yet I've never seen a white guy wash his hands. Even after they leave the smelliest poo i've ever not wanted to smell, they casually walk out and shake other white guys hands and put their hands all over food in the store or put their hands all over the condiments in a resturant place and what not. And yes I spend over $1000 a month on booze, I am not a very hopeful model of the native american people.
#35 to #3
-
anon (3 hours ago) [-]
You sure about that? Illegal immigrants certainly do not seek to better the society they enter, they just want to help themselves. They aggregate in their own closed communities where they serve their own self-interest and try to expand, without giving much thought to how it hurts others. Squatting on land and using that feudal-age power to influence rule over everyone to match their ideal. A good example is France but it is happening all over the place, America included. Unintended or sneaky conquest is still conquest.
#68 to #35
-
godofhorizons (1 hour ago) [-]
Get off your ******* high horse. You are describing 99% of anybody anywhere.
#82 to #35
-
anonmynous (46 minutes ago) [-]
and what have you done to help your own society that didn't benefit yourself? Our society works in such a way that getting an education and a good job does benefit society as a whole and that's all immigrants want while also escaping the poverty and death that surrounds their lives in their home countries. Silicon valley was founded by mexican immigrants.
#33 to #26
-
slapchoppin (3 hours ago) [-] because colonial americans knew all about how viruses work right?
#37 to #33
-
malifauxdeux (3 hours ago) [-]
Yes actually. They used small-pox infected blankets as bio weapons.
#74 to #37
-
mindyourownbusines (1 hour ago) [-]
Really? People are still buying this? From what I remember there was one instance where Europeans openly used disease as a bio-weapon and it affected a very small percentage of one tribe. Most deaths had nothing to do with intentionally spread diseases.
#75 to #74
-
opticmonkey (1 hour ago) [-] Why do you sound like you're disagreeing with him? You're saying the same thing
#77 to #75
-
mindyourownbusines (1 hour ago) [-]
I don't entirely disagree with him. I just disagree with the implication people usually draw that it was a major plot on the part of Europeans to kill off all the natives by spreading disease. In reality, it was nowhere near as widespread as people make on. And I doubt, most colonial Americans knew the viruses were going to kill off the native people when they arrived, as was implied by the context. As I said, I think there was only one or two instances where Europeans intentionally used disease to harm natives.
#18 to #8
-
youregaylol (5 hours ago) [-] Go to south Texas and tell me that those towns aren't mexico in all but name. Heck, go to east Texas and find the same thing.
Liberals only care about land grabs when white people do it. Fact.
Liberals only care about land grabs when white people do it. Fact.
#46 to #45
-
youregaylol (2 hours ago) [-] The 60's called, they want their bleeding heart cause of the month back.
#49 to #47
-
youregaylol (2 hours ago) [-] Baby boomer liberals. For like a month. Ask any beardleg at a Cuckie Panders rally what they think of Tibet and they'll say they love their coffee.
#53 to #50
-
youregaylol (2 hours ago) [-] >"clear counter example"
>based on liberals from 50 years ago
I know you're likely not that bright, but when I say "liberals" I'm referring to current liberals, not every person who has called themselves a liberal in history, you ******* retard.
Next you'll be trying to argue that Liberals don't believe in gay marriage because classical liberals didn't, dummy.
>based on liberals from 50 years ago
I know you're likely not that bright, but when I say "liberals" I'm referring to current liberals, not every person who has called themselves a liberal in history, you ******* retard.
Next you'll be trying to argue that Liberals don't believe in gay marriage because classical liberals didn't, dummy.
#76 to #62
-
opticmonkey (1 hour ago) [-] Not only does your argument suck, but Tibet is literally still a prominent issue. Your whole ****** argument is based on wrong information
#78 to #76
-
youregaylol (1 hour ago) [-] Tibet is still a prominent issue among liberals in the US? Seriously?
Where do they find you morons, it's like you roam in packs.
Where do they find you morons, it's like you roam in packs.
#79 to #76
-
marinepenguin ONLINE (1 hour ago) [-] I live in America and I could ask the next 10 people about what they think about Tibet and China, and probably none of them would have a clue what was going on.
I never even heard of the issue until I was out of high school and I had to educate myself on the issue.
I never even heard of the issue until I was out of high school and I had to educate myself on the issue.
#23 to #18
-
highkingtorygg ONLINE (5 hours ago) [-] I agree, libs be biased
but it's not an organized conquering to our knowledge
but it's not an organized conquering to our knowledge
#39 to #18
-
malifauxdeux (3 hours ago) [-]
That's not conquering ******* . That's like saying the Irish conquered Boston.
#40 to #39
-
youregaylol (3 hours ago) [-] If theres no assimilation, yes. You'd be hard pressed to find an Irish person who thinks Boston is a mini Ireland, but go into Pasadena, Texas and you won't be able to tell the difference from Mexico.
#42 to #40
-
malifauxdeux (2 hours ago) [-]
Oh yeah, because it's not like the mass Irish immigration in to the U.S didn't happen over a century ago or anything. OH wait... And let's not forget all these other "conquerors" like the Quakers, Catholics, Italians, Chinese, Japanese, or any other group who came in mass to the U.S. But here, let me make this easy enough for you to understand the difference between "a bunch of people from a different country moving in to or staying in an area." You know, because Texas was filled with Mexicans before we conquered it.
Conquer-
1.to acquire by force of arms; win in war:
to conquer a foreign land.
2.to overcome by force; subdue:
to conquer an enemy
Conquer-
1.to acquire by force of arms; win in war:
to conquer a foreign land.
2.to overcome by force; subdue:
to conquer an enemy
#44 to #42
-
youregaylol (2 hours ago) [-] Ah, reading comprehension isn't your strong suit. i'm sorry. You see when I mentioned "assimilation" that wasn't just a random assortment of letters. That means that the people assimilated into the country.
"You know, because Texas was filled with Mexicans before we conquered it. "
Who conquered it? Surely you don't mean the american immigrants turned mexican citizens. They were peaceful. They only became violent after they stopped being peaceful, ******** .
You're calling the americans conquerors because they immigrated to mexican land lawfully and took it over?
Why, that almost sounds like my argument.
"You know, because Texas was filled with Mexicans before we conquered it. "
Who conquered it? Surely you don't mean the american immigrants turned mexican citizens. They were peaceful. They only became violent after they stopped being peaceful, ******** .
You're calling the americans conquerors because they immigrated to mexican land lawfully and took it over?
Why, that almost sounds like my argument.
#48 to #44
-
malifauxdeux (2 hours ago) [-] The Mexican American War~
A war between the U.S. and Mexico spanned the period from spring 1846 to fall 1847. The war was initiated by the United States and resulted in Mexico's defeat and the loss of approximately half of its national territory in the north. In the U.S. the war is termed the Mexican–American War, also known as the Mexican War, the U.S.–Mexican War or the Invasion of Mexico. Which led to...
Outnumbered militarily and with many of its large cities occupied, Mexico could not defend itself; the country was also faced with many internal divisions, including the Caste War of Yucatán. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed on February 2, 1848, by American diplomat Nicholas Trist and Mexican plenipotentiary representatives Luis G. Cuevas, Bernardo Couto, and Miguel Atristain, ended the war. The treaty gave the U.S. undisputed control of Texas, established the U.S.-Mexican border of the Rio Grande, and ceded to the United States the present-day states of California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, most of Arizona and Colorado, and parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Wyoming.
Areas gained by the U.S through the treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo colored in white.
Jesus Christ dude...
As per "assimilation" I don't think you understand how long it takes for entire cultures to assimilate, and you still don't have a clear understanding of the word "conquer" apparently if you still want to try to use that word to describe Mexicans living together in a certain area.
A war between the U.S. and Mexico spanned the period from spring 1846 to fall 1847. The war was initiated by the United States and resulted in Mexico's defeat and the loss of approximately half of its national territory in the north. In the U.S. the war is termed the Mexican–American War, also known as the Mexican War, the U.S.–Mexican War or the Invasion of Mexico. Which led to...
Outnumbered militarily and with many of its large cities occupied, Mexico could not defend itself; the country was also faced with many internal divisions, including the Caste War of Yucatán. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed on February 2, 1848, by American diplomat Nicholas Trist and Mexican plenipotentiary representatives Luis G. Cuevas, Bernardo Couto, and Miguel Atristain, ended the war. The treaty gave the U.S. undisputed control of Texas, established the U.S.-Mexican border of the Rio Grande, and ceded to the United States the present-day states of California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, most of Arizona and Colorado, and parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Wyoming.
Areas gained by the U.S through the treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo colored in white.
Jesus Christ dude...
As per "assimilation" I don't think you understand how long it takes for entire cultures to assimilate, and you still don't have a clear understanding of the word "conquer" apparently if you still want to try to use that word to describe Mexicans living together in a certain area.
#51 to #48
-
youregaylol (2 hours ago) [-] Lol, you're trying lecture me about history yet you can't go 10 years back to the ******* TEXAS REVOLUTION. You know, the war not involving the US government and which ended in the Republic of Texas in 1836? That war was fought by Mexican citizens, primarily American immigrants, but not the government of the USA.
Mexico lost it's lands to its own citizens. They went to war with the US after their former citizens decided to join the USA.
"Jesus Christ dude..." indeed. I love it when morons who have no idea what they're talking about try to educate their betters. It's just...perfect,
Yes, the mexicans who have existed in Texans since before the mass immigration of europe in the early 1900's and still haven't assimiliated are just more stubborn than the Irish who assimilated much quicker. It couldn' possibly have to with the social climate of todays america. Just those stubborn americans.
Ask Mexico if their former american immigrants weren't conquerors. You liberals are so cute.
Mexico lost it's lands to its own citizens. They went to war with the US after their former citizens decided to join the USA.
"Jesus Christ dude..." indeed. I love it when morons who have no idea what they're talking about try to educate their betters. It's just...perfect,
Yes, the mexicans who have existed in Texans since before the mass immigration of europe in the early 1900's and still haven't assimiliated are just more stubborn than the Irish who assimilated much quicker. It couldn' possibly have to with the social climate of todays america. Just those stubborn americans.
Ask Mexico if their former american immigrants weren't conquerors. You liberals are so cute.
#36 to #18
-
ericzxvc (3 hours ago) [-] So you're telling me every city that has a Chinatown has been "conquered"? A large group of people in a foreign country isn't "conquering" it just a people from the same culture bringing into their daily lives to enhance them.
Conquering is stealing land and calling it yours, driving people out, none of which is done by peaceful gatherings of immigrants who abide by all laws set in their host country. You can live in Chinatown, the laws are the same in Chinatown, there is no "conquering" being done.
Conquering is stealing land and calling it yours, driving people out, none of which is done by peaceful gatherings of immigrants who abide by all laws set in their host country. You can live in Chinatown, the laws are the same in Chinatown, there is no "conquering" being done.
#41 to #36
-
youregaylol (3 hours ago) [-] "A large group of people in a foreign country isn't "conquering" it just a people from the same culture bringing into their daily lives to enhance them. "
Oy Vey, some cultural enrichments afoot.
Tell that to the Mexicans who lost Texas to "peaceful immigrants.",at least until the immigrants decided to not be so peaceful anymore.
Tell that to the current Texans who are losing their cities now. You don't know a thing about how immigration can easily turn into conquest.
Oy Vey, some cultural enrichments afoot.
Tell that to the Mexicans who lost Texas to "peaceful immigrants.",at least until the immigrants decided to not be so peaceful anymore.
Tell that to the current Texans who are losing their cities now. You don't know a thing about how immigration can easily turn into conquest.
#31 to #17
-
greyhoundfd ONLINE (4 hours ago) [-] Yeah, the British literally everywhere except Quebec. Canada hasn't been French since the French and Indian War.
#6 to #3
-
WutsAtroll (7 hours ago) [-] but it can lead to conquest eventually. Like with the Native Americans/Canadians
#22
-
mrwalkerfour (5 hours ago) [-] indians didnt die because of illegal immigration though. they died because they came into contact with a more powerful people and with foriegn disease which decimated their numbers. it wasnt just because some people turned up that their entire race collapsed. alot of otehr **** had to happen.
when illegal mexicans are more technologically advanced, better educated, armed and supplied and carry diseases that US citizens arent immune to. then you can compare to the indians
when illegal mexicans are more technologically advanced, better educated, armed and supplied and carry diseases that US citizens arent immune to. then you can compare to the indians
#29 to #22
-
scruffyguy (4 hours ago) [-]
The Indians had the same tech as the White man (guns, horses). The Indians' population rebounded after being decimated by disease. They lost to the White man because they couldn't unify to fight them off.
#13
-
walmartysnextghost ONLINE (6 hours ago) [-]
I have a long rant associated with the easiest answer is they don't pay income taxes but still get to enjoy the benefits that taxes pay for.
#19 to #13
-
rockamekishiko ONLINE (5 hours ago) [-] no one should have to pay income taxes. In any case, they still pay every other kind of tax
#70 to #13
-
godofhorizons (1 hour ago) [-] It's actually the complete opposite. Illegal immigrants pay into social security, state taxes, and sales tax, but don't get benefits of the social security.
www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/04/16/Study-Finds-Illegal-Immigrants-Pay-118B-Taxes
www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/04/16/Study-Finds-Illegal-Immigrants-Pay-118B-Taxes
#95 to #70
-
walmartysnextghost ONLINE (14 minutes ago) [-]
what this says is they pay taxes, but would contribute more if they could do it legally. I don't see anything about paying into social security, probably because they deduct it from your paycheck, and if you're an undocumented worker there's not a system in place for you to pay taxes into. If you're paying income tax and social security you have a social security number because you're somewhere along the path to citizenship or have a green card
#28 to #13
-
recoveryone ONLINE (4 hours ago) [-] Eh, only argument I'd make is "What is there to debate about illegal immigrants? They're here illegally." Illegal actions have consequences...
#94 to #81
-
walmartysnextghost ONLINE (18 minutes ago) [-]
There isn't even a system in place for illegal employment to pay income tax. If you're paying income taxes you have a work visa and aren't illegal
#16 to #13
-
thebluedream ONLINE (6 hours ago) [-] Same here, people dont seem to understand the hatred towards illegals is not "the racisms" but rather they can come here and like the jokes say take our jobs because they can work for cheap. They also dont pay taxes like you and most people say "well they pay sales tax on the things they buy" sales tax aint **** . Another argument is "They dont get paid as much as you so quit whining" No they make more because even though they get paid less they dont pay taxes so they get more in the end. Finally, the coup DE gra of it all is they get reap the benefits of being a tax payer despite not being one.
To top it all of Obama has made another executive order that allows graduate from foreign countries to get insta work visas. So now we have to compete with cheap college grads. Going to school in india or mexico is so cheap you can have doctors who work for half the current wages because they dont have insane loans to pay off.
To top it all of Obama has made another executive order that allows graduate from foreign countries to get insta work visas. So now we have to compete with cheap college grads. Going to school in india or mexico is so cheap you can have doctors who work for half the current wages because they dont have insane loans to pay off.
#20 to #16
-
rockamekishiko ONLINE (5 hours ago) [-] I'd say, you pay more in sales tax, than income tax, especially if you don't earn that much which i doubt illegal immigrants do. In fact, most of them earn very little, comparatively, which would grant them tax returns but a lot of them don't claim them.
#24
-
severepwner (5 hours ago) [-] Are we forgetting illegal immigration literally has illegal in the name?
#90
-
pyrusd (34 minutes ago) [-]
I'll just give my opinion, don't know if anyone agrees with me.
I am against illegal immigration.
With that, I am against ILLEGAL immigration. If you want to come here legally, come on over. But, if you don't want to, then don't come here. Because along with the illegal part comes an attitude. That attitude is often of non-assimilation. For example, not speaking English or waving your previous country's flag around. When you do that, you're admitting to us that you don't want to be here and we don't want you here either.
If you want to be here, live here, work here, be on our side and be on our TEAM. Then by all means come here. But more often than not, you don't actually want to be here. You're an opportunist and that's it. You are taking advantage of us and our good graces just to hold allegiance to your home country and to your people. Which is fine, but do that in your country....with your people.
My country is for me and my people. REGARDLESS of where they come from. We come together to be ONE people in ONE nation under ONE flag. We do not have the room nor patience to set up my way and your way in my country. It is to be OUR way, not both yours and mine. We are to have our ways together. If you want to do things your way, do it in your country, not mine.
I am against illegal immigration.
With that, I am against ILLEGAL immigration. If you want to come here legally, come on over. But, if you don't want to, then don't come here. Because along with the illegal part comes an attitude. That attitude is often of non-assimilation. For example, not speaking English or waving your previous country's flag around. When you do that, you're admitting to us that you don't want to be here and we don't want you here either.
If you want to be here, live here, work here, be on our side and be on our TEAM. Then by all means come here. But more often than not, you don't actually want to be here. You're an opportunist and that's it. You are taking advantage of us and our good graces just to hold allegiance to your home country and to your people. Which is fine, but do that in your country....with your people.
My country is for me and my people. REGARDLESS of where they come from. We come together to be ONE people in ONE nation under ONE flag. We do not have the room nor patience to set up my way and your way in my country. It is to be OUR way, not both yours and mine. We are to have our ways together. If you want to do things your way, do it in your country, not mine.
#63
-
bakinboy (2 hours ago) [-] the only way to kill a cuck is to let them cuck themselves to death
#14 to #7
-
walmartysnextghost ONLINE (6 hours ago) [-] I know its just a bug but I took the time to do this because it's how I feel about your comment
#34
-
anon (3 hours ago) [-]
The simple answer is "because it's illegal". Let's quick making out like the problem is the immigration part that is the problem. It's not. It's the illegal part. I have no problem with people who come here legally. The USA has bent over backwards to make it easier to become a citizen and tons of people still choose to come here illegally. Why? So they don't have to pay taxes and follow other laws.
#92 to #80
-
CrowbarNinja (27 minutes ago) [-] Yeah, i've been getting sick of how much garbage is on the front page nowadays. It used to be overused memes and reposts, now its just reposts and political tripe.
#72
-
kellorkleft (1 hour ago) [-]
Admin wonders why less people visit FJ every day? I imagine idiots like the OP posting their idiotic 14 year-old political opinions to initiate one of many daily circle jerks on a comedy-based sharing site may be a pretty big contributor.
#86 to #72
-
youregaylol (39 minutes ago) [-] "people are leaving fj because fj has opinions i dont like"
#91
-
srskate ONLINE (29 minutes ago) [-] Like, instead of picking a legit reason, this is what you go with?
#84
-
letting 
(42 minutes ago) [-] Illegal immigration is bad.
Completely closing our borders to people in need is also bad. *cough*Wall of Trump *cough*
A nice balance would be good, that allowed people to enter the U.S. legally, and not get denied for ******** reasons again and again. I've heard of people from places in Europe even that had to wait years just to get a green card.
Immigrants built this country. Quite literally, unless you're Native American, you or somebody in your ancestry immigrated here.
Completely closing our borders to people in need is also bad. *cough*Wall of Trump *cough*
A nice balance would be good, that allowed people to enter the U.S. legally, and not get denied for ******** reasons again and again. I've heard of people from places in Europe even that had to wait years just to get a green card.
Immigrants built this country. Quite literally, unless you're Native American, you or somebody in your ancestry immigrated here.
#32
-
iibulldog (3 hours ago) [-]
Hate illegal immigrants? Mother ****** , I like my target practice to be tough, and these bastards make it hard as hell! I had just gotten the hang of it when these new ones show up, that Allah Akbar thing they like to shout really throws off my concentration. But, my accuracy has gone up ever since I found out some of them explode!
