Upload
Login or register
x

these wolves is loyal

In a confrontation, female wolves sever the males
threat [protecting his most vulnerable spot) and
pretend to be scared treade to strike back, or take
the hit].
Meanwhile, hoes out here attilia an , secrets he every
lease lip here she mews 3* is tir:
...
+2158
Views: 54174
Favorited: 191
Submitted: 10/01/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to whatdoyawant

Comments(203):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 203 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
181 comments displayed.
Reply
+594
#1 - lapsushominum (10/01/2015) [-]
Other animals>people confirmed
Reply
-43
User avatar #43 to #1 - rassamdul (10/02/2015) [-]
I was out hunting some weeks ago, and then i realised. Even when i am at my most stealthymood, i will never be as quiet as a fox. I will never be as strong as a boar or a bear, and i will never be as fierce as a wolf. The only reason we are ahead, is that piece of metal i was sitting with. Humans are pathetic, when you at majestic creatures like big cats, bears and wolfs
Reply
+73
User avatar #61 to #43 - neokun (10/02/2015) [-]
How the **** are we pathetic we are smarter than then that's why we're alive.
Reply
+12
#87 to #61 - bombadier ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
i'd say a lot of humans are quite pathetic, we have recently just invented these because we are to pathetic to even casually walk...
Reply
+17
User avatar #99 to #87 - neokun (10/02/2015) [-]
Are you for real those things require twice the effort to use than simply walking. That doesn't show laziness at all.
Reply
+3
User avatar #105 to #99 - lolzordz (10/02/2015) [-]
youre missing his point i think
Reply
+2
User avatar #129 to #105 - neokun (10/02/2015) [-]
Invneting that doesn't mean we are too pathetic enough to walk where does that logic come from?
Reply
0
User avatar #148 to #129 - lolzordz (10/02/2015) [-]
i think his point is that generally back in the day people were stronger, faster and more energetic. considering the amount of neckbeard couch potatoes and those who let technology replace physical activity
Reply
-1
User avatar #156 to #148 - bombadier ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
This is pretty much exactly what i mean
Reply
+4
User avatar #118 to #87 - wtfduud (10/02/2015) [-]
That's not pathetic, humans are amazing for even being able to build that **** .
Reply
+3
#139 to #87 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Actually if you really think about it humans are not pathetic. Even though there are much larger and stronger animals in the world that can completely overpower us, we still are the strongest force in nature. Why? Because we managed to escape the food chain. Brawn doesn't always beat brains. Our technology is cutting our workload, effectively increasing "our" strength, despite having a physical disadvantage to other species. That's not pathetic, that's winnning.. duh.
Reply
+2
User avatar #160 to #87 - privatepumpanickel (10/02/2015) [-]
what are those?
Reply
+1
User avatar #161 to #160 - bombadier ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
Like segways but without the bit you hold on too pretty much
Reply
+2
User avatar #138 to #87 - potatot ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
we make **** like this cause we can. thats not pathetic
Reply
0
User avatar #191 to #87 - viscerys ONLINE (10/03/2015) [-]
I think those were invented because someone went "yeah, I think we could do that."
I found, in my ten minutes of using one of those, that they wreck your calves.
Reply
0
User avatar #167 to #87 - wazoowonseventeen (10/02/2015) [-]
i would say we invent stupid **** mostly because of boredom.
Reply
+10
User avatar #109 to #43 - moldybreadcrumb (10/02/2015) [-]
In all ways except physical, you are a fox

RINGADING DING DING DING
Reply
+2
User avatar #114 to #109 - theguythatisnotyou (10/02/2015) [-]
Top tier comment. Good job.
Reply
+19
#103 to #43 - crimsonsunshine (10/02/2015) [-]
Humans are pathetic? We could destroy the whole planet 10X over. We are so powerful we influence global weather with the machines we create. We inhabit every continent except one and the only reason we don't live there is because there is nothing there for us.
Reply
-1
User avatar #142 to #103 - roooledoulf (10/02/2015) [-]
we could destroy the whole planet 10x over, but nature without us will always last 10x longer. Destruction is not competence.
Reply
+32
#73 to #43 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Humans are pathetic because we have losers like you who complain about how we can never be as good at being a fox as a fox is, or as wolf-like as a wolf is, when if you would just take a step back you would realize that we rule the ******* planet. Seriously how beta do you have to be to think like that. "The only reason we are ahead is that piece of metal I was sitting with." Weapons werent given to us by the gods, it took intelligence, innovation, and years of work to perfect "that piece of metal." As far as being majestic, just be fit, have actual control of your body, and have a good understanding of your limitations.
Reply
+6
User avatar #88 to #43 - logiblack ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
A few week ago I was out there flying. Watching over the lands I realized that I will never be as quiet as a fox, as strong as a bear or as smart as a human with their metal.
The only reason we are ahead is because of those wings and eyes we have. Eagles are pathetic if you compare them to those majestic creatures like big cats, bears and humans
Reply
+6
User avatar #90 to #88 - logiblack ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
A few years ago I wandered the steppes. And as I stood there, drinking I realized:
I could never jump as high as a mouse. I'll never be as fast as a jaguar, as camoflaged as a lion or as innovative as the humans with their manmade caves. The only reason we are ahead is because of this huge, remembering brain and our gigantic build.
Elephants are pathetic, when you compare them with majestic creatures like mice, humans or lions
Reply
+3
User avatar #94 to #90 - logiblack ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
A few school-terms ago I was eating in the cafeteria. And as I took a bite I realized that even at my most graceful, I will never be as beautiful as the diva. I'll never be as strong as the bully or the sports-captain and I'll never be as funny as the class-clown. The only reason we are ahead, is this written little thing I was sitting with. Nerds are pathetic if you compare them to majestic creatures like bullies, teachers or *******
Reply
+6
User avatar #96 to #94 - logiblack ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
Long story short:
Stop comparing a fish and a monkey on it's ability to climb trees.
Reply
+5
#145 to #43 - biater (10/02/2015) [-]
You just realized you're not as stealthy as a fox? Tell me when you realize you don't have wings like an eagle
Reply
+3
#154 to #43 - muken (10/02/2015) [-]
Tell ya what. Give me that "piece of metal", and give the same one to a big cat, and see who comes out on top.
Reply
0
User avatar #195 to #154 - rassamdul (10/04/2015) [-]
Jesus christ dude. Even with a semi automatic assault rifle, the big cat would win against you.
Reply
+3
#127 to #43 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
the real reason to why we are ahead of the animals is that a squirrel might climb a tree well, a leaopard might be able to run fast, a bear might be strong, and frogs may have amazing aim when it comes to catch insect with their tounge. But no animal is better than the human when it comes to putting all those elements together, we are simply adapteble to every situation, in every enviroment, thus we have spread all across the earth, and have come to this position where we have to fear no animal.
Reply
0
User avatar #197 to #127 - rassamdul (10/04/2015) [-]
Wise words, read them and got smarter. Thank you.
Reply
+3
User avatar #117 to #43 - dreygur (10/02/2015) [-]
Hit the gym. The human body is a monster at its peak.
Reply
+3
User avatar #108 to #43 - mcsquishin (10/02/2015) [-]
Dude you need to look up a little something called endurance hunting. We humans are some hardcore ************* .
Reply
0
User avatar #199 to #108 - rassamdul (10/04/2015) [-]
Endurance hunting??? We humans... ffs!

Can you outrun a ******* boar? Can you kill a Cougar without a gun.. or even with a gun.. seriously.

Reply
+3
User avatar #85 to #43 - sonnyboii (10/02/2015) [-]
But can a fox fly stealth bombers?

Those ******* aint got **** on bombs
Reply
+3
#144 to #85 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Not unless that fox is fox.
Reply
0
#174 to #144 - eyemeralds (10/02/2015) [-]
What if he's Fox on all levels except physical?
Reply
+3
#141 to #85 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Not unless that fox is fox.
Reply
+7
User avatar #46 to #43 - worldbestbaka (10/02/2015) [-]
But they can't create a rifle, neither handle it. And one bullet can be enough to take them down (or, at least, to hurt them badly).
Reply
+13
User avatar #56 to #46 - capslockftw ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
And the human body can be trained to dish out immense amounts of force, but nobody aint got time for that
Reply
+2
User avatar #158 to #43 - themarineelite (10/02/2015) [-]
Otherkin plz go.
Reply
+2
User avatar #152 to #43 - mion (10/02/2015) [-]
****** , we survived millions of years of evolution. Speak for yourself with being pathetic, but I, for myself, don't think that most humans are completely inbred retards.
Reply
0
User avatar #196 to #152 - rassamdul (10/04/2015) [-]
We are, you think that just 10% of the worlds population could win a hands to hands fight with a big cat. And you all praise the might gun, but would you think that 50% of the population could even use one?
Reply
+1
#125 to #43 - dnf (10/02/2015) [-]
deewd. actually all humans have dormant strength that we can tap into in life or death moments or simply PCP, its said we have the potential to tear a gorilla in half. And don't even get me started on the top fighters of the world. we all have potential, its just your lazy ass who refuses to work and train for it. just like animals have their runts.
Reply
0
User avatar #198 to #125 - rassamdul (10/04/2015) [-]
Who says i aint training? And sure, tear into a gorilla? Not even John Cena or Bruce Lee would have the inhuman strength.. The Gorilla fights back ffs.. You think Chuck Lidell or Macheda would win against a cougar or gorilla?? ffs
Reply
0
User avatar #203 to #198 - dnf (10/06/2015) [-]
**** my bad dude, forgot you were a ******* physicist outta know it all vill with a phd in i have all the facts.
Reply
+1
#175 to #43 - spartantoaster (10/02/2015) [-]
yeah that's why tigers, and rhinos live on a preservation and are considered an endangered species. **** off
Reply
+1
#104 to #43 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
I find it hilarious how douches think that they are superior when in reality, they are dumb as **** . We as a species are ahead because of the ideas of a selected few while the majority enjoy the advances of technology, science, medicine, etc...

Like you said rassamdul, if a human were to be out in the wilderness with nothing but his skin, chances are that they wouldn't last very long. We are a weak and feeble species in comparison to many creatures of the wild. Our ability to think is what puts us ahead and like I said, many people don't use that ability, they just take advantage of the world that has been created for them by other people.
Reply
+3
#107 to #104 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
except people survive exactly that way still and thrive
"week and feeble" we're the only species to hunt others to extinction for ***** and giggles.

no we're not as strong as bears, or as fast as cheetahs but we have thrived like no other species in exactly the same environments as cheetahs and bears and nearly killed some of them off in the process, all while not being as strong or as fast.
every human is capable of more intelligent thought than most animals on this planet.

the fact that we've reached a point in our species where literally none of them have to use that intelligence shows that we are supremely dominant on this world. not that we're weak.
Reply
-1
#177 to #107 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**This anon picked like a few selective words out of all of that.

Reply
0
User avatar #166 to #43 - thekingofengland (10/02/2015) [-]
You value strength and your senses but you don't value intelligence and self awareness
Reply
+1
User avatar #193 to #166 - rassamdul (10/04/2015) [-]
Whose intelligence? The people who created the gun 300 years back? I sure didnt.
Reply
0
User avatar #165 to #43 - bemmo (10/02/2015) [-]
And yet you are the one doing the hunting.
Reply
-1
User avatar #172 to #43 - bladeboy (10/02/2015) [-]
**** being stealthy you edgy **** , humans are smart enough to use weapons.
Reply
0
User avatar #192 to #172 - rassamdul (10/04/2015) [-]
Yeah, and that is how you hunt in scandinavia. Just go run after the ******* boar(its a kind of pig, you ******* citysloth)
Reply
0
User avatar #202 to #192 - bladeboy (10/04/2015) [-]
Wow thanks, I would never have known what a boar was!
Reply
-3
User avatar #155 to #43 - infensive (10/02/2015) [-]
I liked your comment but nobody else did I guess
Reply
0
User avatar #194 to #155 - rassamdul (10/04/2015) [-]
Dont say you agree with somebody already thumbed down. The community has spoken. FJ is overpopulated with people going with the flow.
Reply
+2
#48 to #1 - megakillerx (10/02/2015) [-]
rassamdul

You degenerates should be ashamed of yourselves for uttering such vile words against your species.
If you think that animals are sooo ******* superior, why don't you join the furfags or those otherkin faggots. They seem like good company for your low-ass opinion about yourself and your own species.
Reply
+7
#52 to #48 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Think, use your human brain on this one.

Lots of people are fine with the death of people but get very sad when an animal dies. It has nothing to do with furries if you want proof of that go watch PCG's exclusive commentary with the game developers of prison architect. It comes up pretty early on when they start the game. .

Because people are varied there are lots of reasons but here's an easy one: In a theater play you will see a villanous character. They do bad stuff. When the hero character kills them it is just. They deserved it. The same can not be said of for dogs who are not humans. They function differently. It's scientifically proven that seeing humans make dogs happy. They have evolved to be "man's best friend". Dogs most often don't deserve to die so people become real sad when they see one get hurt.
Reply
+5
#59 to #52 - megakillerx (10/02/2015) [-]
And who did evolved that dog to serve and love us to begin with? We did!

Who are so high up in the food chain that we don't even need to hunt on a regular basis? We are!

Who even put their own brethren in the ******* Moon? We did!

We are the greatest speices in the known Universe, and you don't even realize it.

Reply
+1
#67 to #59 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Well, I mean you could realize that, but that doesn't mean you dont have to cherish an animal.

You sound like the best bait ever.
Reply
-3
User avatar #79 to #58 - megakillerx (10/02/2015) [-]
So not agreeing that Humans are **** = bait?


Good Mental gymnastics right there.
Reply
-1
User avatar #86 to #48 - magicalfruitbasket ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
Animals contribute to the ecosystem, they help it, humans only serve themselves. The first thing humanity did is kill off a ******** of megafauna and then they got themselves deeper in **** as they did nothing but hurt those around them. You see, all "great things" humans do they only do to help themselves. It's like a kid who can blow out extremely loud farts at will, sure it's impressive but otherwise it's bothering everyone around him and it does not make him superior to anyone. So please stop back patting yourself, you're not a divine being nor a lion but merely a chimp who browses FJ.
Reply
+3
User avatar #121 to #86 - wtfduud (10/02/2015) [-]
Animals don't give a **** about the ecosystem. They kill to survive, just as we do. We're the only animal that would see an injured animal on the road and take it to the vet. A lion would eat that **** on the spot.
Reply
-3
User avatar #123 to #121 - magicalfruitbasket ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
*sigh* You really don't know what being part of an ecosystem means do you?
Reply
+3
User avatar #126 to #123 - wtfduud (10/02/2015) [-]
Yeah, it means kill stuff, eat stuff, **** the stuff back out.
You said "You see, all "great things" humans do they only do to help themselves" but we're the only animal that would do stupid **** to help other animals (for example jump into a river to save a bunny).
Reply
-3
User avatar #130 to #126 - magicalfruitbasket ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
They do trough, lions control the population, whale sharks make the water clean, bunnies feed others, corpses nourish plants . Sure none is consensual but it's still contribution.
Reply
+3
User avatar #131 to #130 - wtfduud (10/02/2015) [-]
Yeah, but they do it to help themselves, which you said was a bad thing.
Reply
-2
User avatar #143 to #131 - magicalfruitbasket ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
I never said it was a bad thing, i stated that helping yourself is not a quality however if by doing so you help others without consent, then it is a good thing (see the term "symbiosis", it is not the phenomenon but it is something i can compare it to). It's kinda like saying that "birds are helpful for gardens" even though they do it to help themselves, unconsciously they help others, and that's contribution.
Reply
+1
User avatar #111 to #86 - megakillerx (10/02/2015) [-]
I'd rather be that than an edgy Misanthrope who think it's cool to hate it's own speices.


Also, i accept the risk of also sounding edgy **** the ecosystem. We have proven time and time again that we don't really need it. Would we really be having this conversation if we still thought about what would happend to those precious animals?

Fun fact: diseases are also part of the ecosystem. You wouldn't think so nicely about the Ecosystem and mother nature if you or your family died from smallpox.
Reply
0
User avatar #113 to #111 - magicalfruitbasket ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
" **** the ecosystem" is like " **** the others", yes you can be a total asshat but you should not be, here are the things nature gave us that if they would dissapear: oxygen (trees, plankton) and food (captain obvious dosen't need to point that one out). Now without those, nobody can survive. You might think "well we can get rid of the useless beings" well no, that's why it's an ecosystem, if you take away one element, it ***** up big time. You should not be so arrogant to something you cannot live without. And your argument with the diseases here, well, not gonna lie it's pretty stupid. You see when your coffee spills, it's not the cup's fault, it's yours, same with diseases and i do not blame those who cannot consent. And why would i be thinking of the ecosystem? I had already stated before that humans are not part of the ecosystem. Please refrain from attempting a scientific argument, as you clearly take no interest in biology.
Reply
-1
User avatar #115 to #111 - magicalfruitbasket ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
You know since it's taking you long to reply, i'll give you 2 questions as an alternative reply.

Think about this:

What use does humanity have?
What makes it better than the rest?
Reply
+2
User avatar #119 to #115 - megakillerx (10/02/2015) [-]
I was about to reply but you but alright, i'll take your bait.

"What use does humanity have? "

Use for who or what? The Ecosystem? Nature? The Universe? It's a pretty broad question that i can't answer completely. If you mean the Ecosystem/Nature than i don't know what you're talking about. Techincally, as organic beigns, we are still part of it. Everything we do are still part of what nature designed us to do, yes, even technology is natural.

For the Universe, there is nothing. That's why we'll make our own use or destiny in the Universe.

"What makes it better than the rest?"

For you see, you don't realize the collective power Humanity have. Everything you mentioned about Oxygen and Food, we can already create that artificially. Even if it's not available right now we do have the technology for it.

And another thing you seem to miss is that Humans are the masters of adaptation. Wehter it's the scorching deserts or the frozen tundra, we have settled and thrived on every corner and the most inhospitable places on Earth. Not even the polar caps are human free.

For every year we as a speices have lived in this world, we have done more than any other living being in the universe could have ever hoped for. If any animal would gain sentience today they would worship us as gods.

It's fine for you to care about nature, but don't belittle your fellow man for it.
Reply
-1
User avatar #120 to #119 - magicalfruitbasket ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
Q1:
For anything, at all, what purpose does humanity have outside of helping itself?
Q2:
But that only benefits the species itself, how does that make us better? We can benefit ourselves in more complex ways? What bad would happen if it suddenly vanished?
Reply
+1
User avatar #140 to #120 - megakillerx (10/02/2015) [-]
"For anything, at all, what purpose does humanity have outside of helping itself? "

That's the point, from the very moment we gained sentience we have gaigned the freedom to shape our own destiny. True, the concept of destiny might different for every individual but that's the beauty of it. We wouldn't have made incredible forms of art and technology if we still relied on our instincts like any other animal. As for a collective destiny you might ask: that also varies and benefits us. We also wouldn't have built the pyramids, connected the world with our infrastructure or even put our fellow man on the moon if we still behaved like animals.

"But that only benefits the species itself, how does that make us better? We can benefit ourselves in more complex ways? What bad would happen if it suddenly vanished?"

Here's a question for you: What's so bad about us looking out for ourselves? Because let's face it; Animals are not our equals, no matter how much you seemingly want it to be true.

We are great because we desire more than any other creature does. We want to Explore, we want to Express, we want to create. Even when there are flaws with us, we are still doing better than and achived more than any other life in the Universe.

As for the consequences of us vanishing, the Universe would lose an ambicoius speices that desired more. Our legacy will last wether it's here on Earth or on any other place in the Universe, future generations of sentient life will see us as we do with the Romans, Persians, Greeks etc.

If you seriously think that any of these are either bad or pointless, then there's no point in arguing with you IMO.
Reply
-1
User avatar #151 to #140 - magicalfruitbasket ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
The response:
It's not bad to be looking for yourself, you, however, stated that we could can do whatever we want to those around us. Witch we should not do. And humans have done nothing for the planet than to vandalize it and then fix their own mistakes.

And your argument with civilizations: the earth is munch older than humanity, with a munch more complex history and worked impeccably until humans showed up. So what makes you say it's pointless? What makes earth's human history more important than it's biology?

If a person is the only one to see and have ever seen the greatness in himself, he is a narcissist. And therefore humanity is nothing more than an narcissistic species which takes but is the only one to not give.
Reply
0
User avatar #181 to #151 - magicalfruitbasket ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
Oh look megakillerx took the time to downvote all of my comments. Isn't that cute.
Reply
-1
#136 to #48 - dnf (10/02/2015) [-]
WHOA what kinda ****** up conquistador propaganda are you giving these people man. the indigenous people believed in tuning in with nature and following a harmonious path such as the 8 fold path. not viewing themselves as gods, but acknowledging a higher force that constructed and pulls strings behind the curtain of the physical, and map out the internal energy that flows with in all our bodies, connecting our consciousness. their is a far, far deeper meaning to the metamorphosis of our species that connects all life together extending beyond time and space, quantum states and dark voids and energies, these guys wern't idiots, they embodied nature and listened from deep within cause they knew, what happens internally is expressed externally. not to mention rumor has it we had some help. an very good teachers.
Reply
+1
#146 to #136 - megakillerx (10/02/2015) [-]
And what psuedo hippie ******** are you giving to us? If you seriously think that Injuns where peacful loving tribals then you might look up the Aztecs or Inter native warfare.

In fact, i'll do it for you:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sacrifice_in_Aztec_culture

www.historyandtheheadlines.abc-clio.com/ContentPages/ContentPage.aspx?entryId=1171775¤tSection=1161468

As for your Indian Philosophy: Yeah, look how that turned out for them: Stagnancy, for both the American Civilizations and the tribals. No desire for improvement or change for yourself or your fellow human beigns. None of them didn't even invent as simple as the bloody wheel.

And what legacy did they leave behind other than being over gloryfied savages? Nothing as far as i see it. Stagnancy is the biggest killer in any society, the Indians where no different.
Reply
0
#153 to #146 - dnf (10/02/2015) [-]
bitch please that's cause you love to suck the dick of your so called modern life. we've plowed through earths resources like a starving monkey at the grocery store. i'm not talking about savages hommie, i'm talking about the masters buddha, i'm talking bout jesus, and i'm talking about the people who where their in the beginning drawing all sorts of complex symbols and mapping out stars they couldn't even friggin see, every generation has had their savages, i don't suppose you want me to link you to all the inhuman ******** going on in warefare in todays day and age do you? you think the aztecs dropped a nuke? sit the **** down. besides among the common indigenous person were teachers of great wisdom, like shamans, and monks ect. if you look towards the east you'll find philosophy so accient, no body really even knows where it came from or who mapped these things out. but squaring the circle, yin and yang and all that stuff is very heavy material concerning and covering many aspects of nature.
Reply
-1
User avatar #200 to #48 - rassamdul (10/04/2015) [-]
Dude, i am not ashamed to be human. I am ashamed to be the same kin as you, but that is another story.

But sure, you would surely be able to wrestle a boar or outrun a cougar.. Go ahead, ******* ! Hurr Durr you the worst idiot in the thread, of many stupid cityfolk.
Reply
0
User avatar #201 to #200 - megakillerx (10/04/2015) [-]
> "Dude, i am not ashamed to be human. I am ashamed to be the same kin as you, but that is another story."

> " Hurr Durr Humans are pathetic, when you at majestic creatures like big cats, bears and wolfs"

Sounds alot like Edgy misantrhopy to me m8.

And we suuure are weak and pathetic, that's why we hunted Ice Age beasts into extinction, Settled into every corner of planet earth (even the ice caps aren't human free anymore), tamed fierce predators to become our companions (Wolves, Cats, Eagles, Insects etc), Built Civilization and put a man on the Moon. Get the **** outta here with your **** logic.

And yes, i AM able to wrestle and outrun any animal, anyone can at their physical peak. But i guess you wouldn't know anything about that now, would you?

Nice insult there "cityfolk", shame it doesn't work for someone who has lived in a village surrounded in the Scandinavian forests all their childhood.
Reply
0
#101 to #48 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Reply
+4
#33 to #1 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
I feel you, but all the wasps and other asshole animals are almost worse than the idiot peiole I know
Reply
+6
User avatar #41 to #33 - shatted (10/02/2015) [-]
but the wasps and other asshole animals are just being animals, they don't know better. Asshole people however...
Reply
+9
#45 to #41 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
are just being animals, and don't know better
Reply
+3
User avatar #63 to #41 - angelious (10/02/2015) [-]
plus asshole people have guns.


and guns hurt a lot more than wasps.
Reply
+2
User avatar #92 to #1 - Ruspanic (10/02/2015) [-]
Time to go **** a wolf.
Wish me luck
Reply
+3
User avatar #77 to #1 - mintea (10/02/2015) [-]
**** bitch that was a good show
Reply
0
User avatar #124 to #77 - lapsushominum (10/02/2015) [-]
You're damn right, man.
Reply
+37
#3 to #1 - dyingalone (10/01/2015) [-]
It was never a debate
Reply
+152
User avatar #4 to #1 - xskullgirlsx (10/01/2015) [-]
Animals have to focus on survival

Humans are focusing on pronouns and other stupid ****
Reply
+15
User avatar #8 to #4 - shenro (10/02/2015) [-]
bcuz survival is no longer an every day strugle for us.
Reply
+127
#15 to #8 - truedancingturian (10/02/2015) [-]
but grammar sure is, holy ****
Reply
+11
#25 to #15 - brobathehutt (10/02/2015) [-]
Laughed the flesh off my bones with that one
Reply
+1
User avatar #47 to #15 - bluemoonz (10/02/2015) [-]
10/10 reply
Reply
-4
User avatar #35 to #15 - mikli (10/02/2015) [-]
There's nothing wrong with his grammar though is there
his spelling is horrible
Reply
0
User avatar #168 to #35 - actualsingaporean (10/02/2015) [-]
good job dude you saved this comment section
Reply
0
User avatar #187 to #168 - mikli (10/03/2015) [-]
thank
Reply
-2
#97 to #15 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
There's nothing wrong with his grammar.
Reply
+3
User avatar #24 to #8 - tzukaza ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
still is a struggle to survive, finding jobs to afford food on the table etc is always a struggle
Reply
0
User avatar #75 to #24 - shenro (10/02/2015) [-]
but there are many ways one can get food on the table. back in the day you could only hunt and gather berries, now if you can't find ANY job, you can still resort to stealing and if that doesnt fit your moral code, go hunt the meat yourself.
Reply
-5
#34 to #8 - infinitereaper (10/02/2015) [-]
Hence increasing overpopulation, idiocracy and the Westbro Baptist church.
Mother ******* won't stop ******* . So now we ALL gotta sit through traffic while some jackass holds up the lane driving 5 below the speed limit. All because of some guy who didn't need to exist!
Reply
+31
User avatar #7 - italianfrosttroll (10/02/2015) [-]
I love working with Wolves, they're a cool bunch.
Reply
+41
User avatar #10 to #7 - satansferret (10/02/2015) [-]
Do you dance with em?
Reply
+11
User avatar #11 to #10 - italianfrosttroll (10/02/2015) [-]
Nah, that's a thought though.
Reply
+53
#16 to #11 - Dember ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
>>#10,
Reply
+6
#159 to #16 - Kanoah (10/02/2015) [-]
I had never realized just how big wolves were until now
Reply
+2
#162 to #159 - Dember ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
Yep, compared to a typical husky which weighs about 35 - 50 pounds on average (yet is still considered a medium to large dog), they're massive!

They are also taller than German Shepherds (though comparable to the same size in weight), and taller than Alaskan Malamutes as well, but much more lean than the Malamute, which is capable of growing significantly heavier; especially the Giant variety.

photo from european wolfdogs, used for educational purposes
Reply
+3
User avatar #122 to #16 - lapsushominum (10/02/2015) [-]
What's source on this? Wow damn you never really think about how big they are because they're down on all fours. O_o
Reply
+2
#132 to #122 - Dember ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
I'm not certain, but I can tell you those are both at least mid content wolfdogs - and could well be high content or allegedly "pure" wolves.

Hard to tell for certain at such a quick glimpse of them, because true mid contents actually look very convincingly like real wolves - not like "wolfy looking" dogs unlike lower contents or lookalike breeds such as huskies, malamutes or even german shepherds.

Notice the professionally built, zoo-grade enclosure with 9+ foot tall fencing, and even platforms for them to climb on and rest under - you see this in wolfdog enclosures a lot. Prior to common misconception, they cannot and will not be contained in a typical backyard like a dog.

Wolves actually aren't any larger than the average German Shepherd dog, ranging from about 70 to 130 pounds on average - but they are significantly taller, having much longer legs and also bigger paws, narrower builds (very laterally compressed) and much bigger heads and teeth.

Especially in winter coat, that makes them look a lot bigger than they really are under all that fur. The ones who exceed that size are usually mixed with breeds such as the Giant Alaskan Malamute, which sometimes reaches up to, or even over 150 pounds.

In this picture, this is an average sized higher content wolfdog -- the two little ones, however, look to be closer to the low content range; they are not high content or pure wolf pups which look much different even at that age. They look like Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs or similar.
Reply
+1
User avatar #133 to #132 - lapsushominum (10/02/2015) [-]
Oh huh, interesting. Thanks :3
Reply
+1
#135 to #133 - Dember ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
You're very welcome. I've worked with them of all content levels, from wolf-like dog mixes with little or no wolf blood in them, to true high contents and nearly pure wolves. If you ever have any wolf or wolfdog related questions, I can probably answer them for you - or find a knowledgeable, experienced and reliable source for you who can. = )
Reply
0
#186 to #135 - veryfahnyjokes (10/03/2015) [-]
I love wolves. Is this a pure wolf in the picture, I've seen pictures of those dark wolves and I wondered if there is a kind of dark wolves or is it just some wolf-dog mix
Reply
+1
#188 to #186 - Dember ONLINE (10/03/2015) [-]
She is a selectively bred high content wolfdog in the 90% range, mixed with Arctic and Timber wolf. = )

The color is called Black Phase, meaning they start off black and turn more brown, silver or even pure white as they mature.
Reply
0
User avatar #189 to #186 - Dember ONLINE (10/03/2015) [-]
Oh - if you meant the picture you posted, yes, that would be a high content or "pure" / nearly pure wolf.

Virtually all wolves are mixed with at least some small percentage of dog (and even coyote) though so there's really no such thing as a "100%" pure wolf.

Interestingly, the Black Phase color mutation actually first arose in domestic dogs, and was passed back to wild wolves due to natural cross-breeding.
If not for wolves mixing with dogs for thousands of years, there would be no black wolves. = )
Reply
+158
#5 - GEARBOY (10/01/2015) [-]
wolves (/^-^)/
Reply
+1
#178 to #5 - xtrem (10/02/2015) [-]
Darksouls made love wolves
Reply
+46
#6 to #5 - cleomech (10/01/2015) [-]
technically a wolf
Reply
+5
User avatar #57 to #6 - brobafett (10/02/2015) [-]
**** off huey.
Reply
+2
User avatar #100 to #6 - strangesir (10/02/2015) [-]
"Noooo, it's a dog!"
Reply
+45
#12 - mitosis (10/02/2015) [-]
I got a blast of nostalgia from this. I thought I saw a similar scene from Balto, so I searched it in google.

Yeeeeaaah, long story short I was graced with images of Balto sucking horse ass. Thanks internet!
0
#18 to #12 - huntergriff has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
0
#106 to #12 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
source?
Reply
+12
User avatar #13 to #12 - sketchysketchist (10/02/2015) [-]
If there's an animal in it, furries ruined it.
Unless it's ponies, then it's way worst off since the bronies were more than happy to take the furries sloppy seconds.
But to be fair, everything has been ruined thanks to the internet.
Reply
+3
User avatar #23 to #13 - monkeysniper (10/02/2015) [-]
Eh. I'm a furry and a brony but I always get irriated as hell when it spills into something I enjoyed when I was little like cartoons, Balto, etc. Every group has their loud, crazy few folks that makes the rest look bad. Personally I got into it because of some of the amazing artwork.
Reply
-2
User avatar #29 to #23 - sketchysketchist (10/02/2015) [-]
Wow, even furries/bronies hate furries/bronies.
That's good to know, now if only the sane ones would put the weird ones on lock.
And maybe did something about the ones that **** animals/ruin the show for little girls?

Just putting that out there.
Reply
+8
User avatar #37 to #29 - brothergrimm (10/02/2015) [-]
"now if only the sane ones would put the weird ones on lock"

The same could be said of damn near every other labeled group in the world

******* , faggots, jihadis, feminists, rednecks, etc
Reply
+1
User avatar #182 to #37 - sketchysketchist (10/03/2015) [-]
Yeah, but don't you guys hang around the same sites and blogs and forums?
Can't you just bash the weird ones to weirder sites that can be seen as sanity graveyards or something?
Reply
0
User avatar #184 to #182 - brothergrimm (10/03/2015) [-]
If it worked like that, it'd already be done
Reply
0
User avatar #185 to #184 - sketchysketchist (10/03/2015) [-]
Damn it.
I guess people just block anyone with sense.
Reply
+1
User avatar #112 to #29 - monkeysniper (10/02/2015) [-]
Okay, let's take virtually any group you may or may not belong in. Are you a Christian? Oh well then you might as well be a part of the KKK (with that logic) Why aren't they putting the lock on those guys? As well someone else being a brony/furry doesn't determine whether we'll be friends or enemies. Sure it's another aspect of common ground but there's numerous other factors that could make or break any kind of relationship. Most furries/ bronies I do know though you wouldn't be able to tell they were unless you asked. Though one common thread I've noticed is a general affinity for the arts among them, be it writing, music, or art.
Reply
0
User avatar #183 to #112 - sketchysketchist (10/03/2015) [-]
What I said in comment 182.
Reply
+9
#89 - guanyu (10/02/2015) [-]
It's English, Jim, but not as we know it.
Reply
+64
#14 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
This is how women acted before feminism started teaching women that it is unacceptable to support/love/serve men in any way.

As a proud traditional woman, I can promise the males on this site that women like this DO exist. Many women exist who would proudly stand by their man and support him in his endeavors. Of course, all relationships require effort from both sides, but women like the female wolf in this photo do exist.

Of course, not all women want to serve a man. Some would rather serve a woman. Some men want to serve a woman. (Note: serving is a choice, not something submissive people are forced into!)

Feminism has demonized the idea of women being submissive to their boyfriends/husbands, but submissive, respectful women do exist. Fortunately for men who are submissive, dominant women also exist! Gender doesn't matter. But for those who enjoy this dynamic, it's still possible!

Not all women are selfish, loud, angry feminists who have no personal responsibility and who think the world should revolve around them. Many of us are mature and respectful.

Sorry for rambling. I just hope you guys don't give up! This kind of devoted love CAN exist today. Hookup culture and modern feminism are destroying traditional monogamous relationships, but women (and men!) like the female wolf in this article DO exist!

I'm not implying that all people should be traditional or that traditional relationships are better than other types of relationships - I'm simply encouraging those who do want a traditional relationship.
Reply
0
#149 to #14 - peyko (10/02/2015) [-]
**peyko used "*roll picture*"**
**peyko rolled image** anon was good today.
Reply
0
#171 to #14 - spartantoaster (10/02/2015) [-]
Speaks volumes this anon doesn't log in to collect those delicious thumbs, I salute you.
Reply
+1
#66 to #14 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
I'm confused, are you saying being supportive and doing the traditional roles of cooking/cleaning is being submissive?
Or are you saying there's nothing wrong with being submissive as a concious choice?

I'm submissive to my man but only because I know I can trust him to not take advantage and treat me like **** . Like, daily life is equal, but as soon as a boob is touched or the pants come down, sub mode is on.
And it's such a warm fuzzy feeling to be able to cook dinner for him and do all the household stuff, but only cause I know he actually appreciates it, it's not 'expected' that I do it because 'that's a womans job'.

Doing the traditional household stuff if you don't work isn't being submissive, it's pulling your weight in an equal relationship.
To actually be a submissive takes a good amount of communication and the knowledge that he won't forget you're an equal, not a slave once the pants are back on.

I wouldn't compare yourself to the wolf though, it's just a wolf cowering from the dominant wolf, I doubt it's even female.
Reply
+2
User avatar #26 to #14 - ugoboom ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
You need to login to view this link if you haven't seen it before, anon. We know y'all exist.
Never give up hope, you girls are the true heroes we need in these dark times of post-progressivism.
Reply
+3
#20 to #14 - fappening (10/02/2015) [-]
this should be sticky
Reply
+2
User avatar #64 to #14 - belshir (10/02/2015) [-]
the only example i have is that i was at a club and another girl started grinding me, i sort of shuffled away to be polite aand she gave me this look real nasty like. Saw her again later and (being quite drunk) i cant remember what she said to me (or i might of said) and it ended up with her yelling at me but she didnt realise the 5'10 girl next to me plays rugby and i was currently dating, the rugby player didnt waste a breath and straight up slapped the soul out of this girl, it was fantastic tp watch, it one of the only parts of that night i remember
Reply
+14
User avatar #31 to #14 - MandiMarie (10/02/2015) [-]
I was always under the impression that feminism supports all these types of relationships, that women should be able to be in a traditional relationship or in an open one or single or any of these and not be judged for it. Assholes on Tumblr just ruined the name somewhere along the way.
Reply
+6
User avatar #32 to #31 - shaddyz (10/02/2015) [-]
pretty much on spot
Reply
+5
#39 - whippedcream (10/02/2015) [-]
Wolves is SPESS
Reply
+9
User avatar #9 - stringfingerable (10/02/2015) [-]
Too bad they're extinct in crap-ass California.
Reply
0
#28 to #9 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
well im sure you can find there charred remains.
Reply
0
User avatar #95 to #9 - nagasadow (10/02/2015) [-]
There's one pack
Reply
+2
#17 to #9 - Dember ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
Extinct yes, but still kept as exotic pets. What part of Cali do you live in? I'm in Norcal and I know several breeders. Look at this gorgeous ****** , he's my friend's "dog" : P
Reply
-1
#68 to #17 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
''Lets keep a wild animal as a pet and then act surprised when it attacks someone!''
Wolves are not dogs, you can't safely keep them as pets and you could never trust them around other pets or children.

'Murica
Reply
+1
#71 to #68 - Dember ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
Cough, cough...

I realize you're probably just trolling, but on the good chance that you're just truly ignorant, let me hit you with some knowledge.

Wolfdogs are not wild animals - nor are captive-bred wolves. They are born in captivity, meaning they cannot survive in the wild; virtually all attempts to reintroduce them into the wild have failed. They will die a slow death - they must be kept in zoos, sanctuaries; or, yes, as exotic pets.

They are NOT aggressive animals. In fact, they are very shy and skittish toward humans in general. While they might go after chickens, other livestock such as goats, as well as cats or even small dogs if the person owning them is negligent enough to let them run loose (I guarantee you, if they do they will not have them for long - they cannot be trained to stay near your property without a secure climb-proof, dig-proof fence - they WILL get loose and end up getting killed) they present no threat to people, nor children for that matter.

The reason care must be taken to raise them with children is because they are big, powerful and don't know their own strength -- this is NO different than any other high-energy, large-breed dog, which can also accidentally harm small kids if not trained or contained properly.
As with any large dog, interaction between them and any child should always be carefully supervised to ensure neither the kid nor the animal behaves inappropriately.

As you may see here, in the case of my own pup's brother: it can certainly be done.
Reply
0
#72 to #71 - Dember ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
>>#68,
They can certainly be raised with other dogs, and in fact they must be in order to thrive, because they are pack animals; they need a companion of the opposite sex (with one or both spayed or neutered, preferably) to keep them company, or they will be lonely and miserable.

It doesn't matter if it's another wolf, wolfdog or even a labrador or a poodle; any medium to large breed canine will work. They are simply social creatures who are not happy in a one-canine family.

However, once they reach full maturity, they will usually stop tolerating other canines of the same sex, because they naturally view them as competition -- in the exact same way that most pure dog Huskies and Malamutes will do, as well as many others.
Regular dogs who don't like other dogs of their own gender are not uncommon by any means - this is largely because they are so closely related to wolves, themselves.


Also, as long as they are raised with cats from a young age, they usually do just fine with those too. Case in point, pictured above.

photo from Winddancer Wolves, used for educational purposed only
Reply
0
User avatar #38 to #17 - brothergrimm (10/02/2015) [-]
Goddamn you and your gorgeous animals......
Reply
0
User avatar #30 to #17 - stringfingerable (10/02/2015) [-]
I live in SoCal. I know there are wolves kept in our zoo, but I really wish they weren't extinct in the wild here. That is indeed pretty looking wolf. Does it have a name?
Reply
0
#69 to #30 - Dember ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
>>#38,
Ah, you're lucky then!
There's a breeder with a pair of seriously gorgeous mid content wolfdogs (both being about half wolf, half dog) down there called Asher Ovirlok whom I would just love a puppy from, but it's quite a trip all the way from the Sacramento area where we are.

Actually, one of our own pups lives in San Diego as well, by the name of Kojack -- and he was fathered by the handsome bastard I posted just above!

His name is Cove, and he actually isn't a wolf, he is a 70% "upper-mid content" wolfdog, meaning he's just under 3/4 Timber Wolf.

Magnificent animal - and he is a rescue too; from good lineage (hailing from what is widely regarded as one of the top wolfdog breeders in the US, Southern Breeze) but having ended up in a home what was very unprepared to raise an animal that truly is mostly wolf.

They simply don't behave like dogs, and the people who bought him found this out when as a small pup, he broke and mangled his leg very badly and nearly bled to death.
Not having the money to get him the care he needed, they considered surrendering him or putting him to sleep - until his current owners volunteered to take him in.

More than $10,000 in vet bills later to get him the life-saving surgeries, he's a strong, healthy, happy young stud who doesn't ever let his tripod status prevent him from servicing any and all of the ladies presented to him. ; P

Here he is with our own female, a husky/shepherd mix, whom he sired a litter with earlier this year. They had 7 pups together.
Reply
+4
#21 - fappening (10/02/2015) [-]
the title
Reply
+3
#150 - makeakilling (10/02/2015) [-]
I keep thinking "smdh" means "smack my dick head."
Reply
0
#190 to #150 - anon (10/03/2015) [-]
Isn't there a song with thosde lyrics? ....or was it "smack my picture"?
Reply
+3
#76 - Jabberwocky (10/02/2015) [-]
Social media is slowly strangling the English language to death in a vice grip.
Reply
+3
#44 - zolzol (10/02/2015) [-]
Could someone tell me what 'smdh' means?
Reply
+2
User avatar #49 to #44 - beasert (10/02/2015) [-]
So much damn hate.
Reply
+2
User avatar #98 to #49 - sphincterface (10/02/2015) [-]
Really? I thought it was shaking my damn head, since smh means shaking my head.
Reply
0
User avatar #180 to #98 - beasert (10/02/2015) [-]
Perhaps I'm wrong. I thought 'smh' meant 'so much hate.'
Reply
+2
User avatar #53 to #49 - poutinesalad (10/02/2015) [-]
see, thats what I thought it was for a hell of a long time until I looked it up. Either I've been wrong for many of the 20 years I've been hopelessly addicted to the internet, or the internet has changed the definition (which is just as, if not more likely)... but it stands for shake my damn head. Just like how SMH stands for shake my head
Reply
+1
#51 to #49 - zolzol (10/02/2015) [-]
Thanks man.
Reply
+3
#2 - kanedam ONLINE (10/01/2015) [-]
Reply
+6
#65 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Wow, talk about making stuff up.
Only the alpha pair can mate and neither brown wolf is the alpha there, they are both submissive to the white one.

It is also no good in a confrontation if one wolf is getting in the way if her mate needs to attack, most likely she will stand by his side and show equal aggression along with the rest of the pack while the nanny would take care of any cubs.

It's also no good 'taking a hit' because in the wild if you get hurt you risk infection, starvation and death. Animals only fight as a last resort.

This type of ******** is what gets spread around when people anthropomorphise animals and project their feelings onto them.
Reply
+1
User avatar #169 to #65 - lapsushominum (10/02/2015) [-]
>Complains about making stuff up
>Refers to the fake alpha hierarchy model
Reply
+2
#116 - johrny (10/02/2015) [-]
Smdh = Suck my dick hard?
Reply
+1
User avatar #179 to #116 - dingdongpancakes (10/02/2015) [-]
I know some basketball american so let me translate.
Smdh= shaking my damn head
I'll be there anytime you need me fam.
Reply
+2
User avatar #60 - slapchoppin (10/02/2015) [-]
wolves are basically dogs so of course they're loyal

you think its possible to breed the level of loyalty dogs have?
Reply
+1
#62 to #60 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
Wolves and dogs are different animals that share a common ancestor.

Yes it is possible to breed loyalty, just as we have bred stupidity, aggression, intelligence, herding or prey drives and other desired characteristics.
Reply
-1
User avatar #70 to #62 - mutzaki ONLINE (10/02/2015) [-]
They're the same species, so not really different animals. It's true, though, that the loyalty of dogs was bred into them.
Reply
+2
User avatar #50 - kingofthedragonmen (10/02/2015) [-]
Apparently wolves are not the only ones that are faithful and supportive towards their partners.

www.audubon.org/news/royal-pairings-birds-mate-life

And there are also species of fish and species of termites that form total monogamous relationships.

Even some parasites do this :

Schistosoma mansoni worms

"They may not offer the conventional image of love, but these parasitic worms are usually far more faithful than the humans they inhabit. As unromantic as it sounds, they cause the disease schistosomiasis, also known as snail fever. When they reproduce sexually within the human body, they form loyal monogamous pair bonds that typically last the entire cycle."

Humans have a lot to learn from others animals.
But most humans just think "We went to space,created medicine etc. so there is nothing to learn from animals".

Although i don't really know how going to space and creating medicine helps out when your population is going down faster than it reproduces.

We humans have long way to go.
Reply
+1
#147 - anon (10/02/2015) [-]
this bitch is loyal
Reply
+1
#110 - AztecJew (10/02/2015) [-]
There you have it gents. You can either find a woman whose parents raised her like it was pre-1960 and doesn't perceive taking care of or standing up for your man as being subservient/oppressed or...you can find a nice wolf.
12>
[ 203 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)