Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(112):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12>
[ 112 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
99 comments displayed.
Reply
+298
User avatar #2 - akulakhan ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-]
Feminism is much more easily curable than cancer, all it takes is to grow up to cure it. Actually grow up, not just get older.
Reply
0
#37 to #2 - blackjesusatheist (12/29/2015) [-]
aren't they both the same?
Reply
+3
User avatar #73 to #37 - sooshishef (12/29/2015) [-]
No idea why you're getting red thumbed. It was a funny comment.
Reply
+3
#86 to #2 - balor (12/29/2015) [-]
GIF
Feminism can be cured by having a strong male leader in the home.
But too many dads either leave their families, or get kicked out.
Reply
+6
#9 to #2 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
and it depends on how much ignorance the feminist has before she can be turned to reason
Reply
+5
User avatar #78 to #2 - elcreepo (12/29/2015) [-]
You don't realize how many people NEVER grow up, do you

And a child with feminism makes their parents lives miserable by treating them absolutely ******* horrifyingly and then calling CPS when they don't get their way claiming their father raped them
Reply
+18
User avatar #15 to #2 - sanitarysan (12/29/2015) [-]
if he has type 3 feminism he most likely is retarded, no cure for that i'm afraid...
Reply
+184
User avatar #3 to #2 - Zaxplab (12/28/2015) [-]
But cancer isn't contagious.
Reply
+61
#4 to #3 - akulakhan ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-]
Reply
+40
User avatar #7 to #4 - rockergamer ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-]
and cancer won't gather a bunch of other cancer patients to send death threats and make false rape accusations
Reply
+37
#29 to #3 - ablock (12/29/2015) [-]
Have you been to FunnyJunk?
Reply
+8
User avatar #54 to #29 - zzzanzitron ONLINE (12/29/2015) [-]
its not cancer
It's autism
Reply
0
User avatar #12 to #3 - quantumranger (12/29/2015) [-]
There is a cancer that affects tasmanian devils that is contagious. Also apparently there are two other types of cancer that are contagious, but I didn't feel like looking harder. Not trying to be rude or anything, just something interesting I thought was relevant
Reply
+10
#42 to #12 - lordcookie (12/29/2015) [-]
Hi, Immunologist here.

The Tazmanian Devil case was due to the species having an identical Type-1 Major Histocompatibility Complex (T1-MHC). This is essentially a tag every cell in your body has that says don't **** with me please, I'm a civilian. Normally, cell transplants where different T1-MHC's are present can cause an immune response, leading to rejection of the cells. This is why tissue typing in organ transplants is so important. The immune response can kill people.

As the T1-MHC was identical in the Tasmanian Devils, when cancer cells were transmitted by blood in fights the immune system couldn't recognize cancer cells from another Tasmanian Devil as foreign. As such, the cancer cells weren't killed off and could establish themselves as a brand new tumor (see picture). As we all know, Tasmanian Devils are aggressive little buggers, so the cycle was self perpetuating.

This couldn't happen in humans because our T1-MHC is so diverse as a species. The only exception i can think of is in identical twins, where transmissible leukaemia is a possibility if they were involved with a mutual blood transfusion and it was undiagnosed. But this would be stupidly unfortunate.

In terms of sexually transmitted cancers, there are none directly. However, many viruses can cause cancer. For example, Human Papillomavirus (HPV) can cause cervical cancer, and HIV massively increases the risk of Kaposi Sarcoma.

TL;DR - A special tag on cells stops the body going all american army and destroying the wrong damn thing. System doesn't work in Tasmanian Devils, works in humans. **** be whack yo.
Reply
+1
User avatar #25 to #12 - brobathehutt (12/29/2015) [-]
Actually the reason that cancer is contagious is because of lack of genetic diversity with Tasmanian devils. I'm not entirely sure how lack of genetic diversity actually caused cancer to become contagious, in humans inbreeding doesn't make you more likely to get cancer ( to my knowledge ), but given that the other forms of contagious cancer are in non-human animals as well I suppose it's just something within our genetics.
Reply
0
#66 to #25 - warwren ONLINE (12/29/2015) [-]
It's a lack of diversity in the MHC genes, they have the most polymorphic loci in humans but in devils they're basically the same in every devil, so the cells don't recognise them as foreign. I read a paper recently on mixed lymphocyte reactions and reverse transcription PCR used to test the diversity. It is insane.
Reply
+1
User avatar #85 to #66 - brobathehutt (12/29/2015) [-]
#42 beat you to the punch, but yeah that's really crazy. I can't imagine how evolution wise that is a good thing, but the species is close to extinction so I guess they're not good examples for evolution to begin with.
Reply
0
#88 to #85 - warwren ONLINE (12/29/2015) [-]
I guess there was a bottleneck in the population, like with cheetahs. I tried to dumb it down a bit as I'm a biologist not an immunologist!
Reply
0
User avatar #89 to #88 - brobathehutt (12/29/2015) [-]
There might have been a bottleneck, but I think it was just the fact that humans destroyed their environment that is making them go extinct.
Reply
0
#94 to #89 - warwren ONLINE (12/29/2015) [-]
Ah no I meant the reason for the lack of genetic diversity was probably a bottleneck in the past. There was a healthy devil population until a mutation in a female caused the devils facial tumour disease, that spreading through the population has the devils on the brink of extinction. As far as I know they are quarantining healthy devils and will re-release when the wild devils have been wiped out.
Reply
0
User avatar #96 to #94 - brobathehutt (12/29/2015) [-]
Oh I see, couldn't the lack of genetic diversity be that they have to quarantine healthy devils?
Reply
0
#97 to #96 - warwren ONLINE (12/29/2015) [-]
Yeah it'll definitely lower the diversity even more, meaning any similar future mutations will be catastrophic to a smaller population
Reply
+1
#14 to #12 - warwren ONLINE (12/29/2015) [-]
There's a canine sexually transmitted cancer and a similar one in Syrian hamsters. Contagious dick cancers no less.
Reply
0
#101 to #3 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
HPV.

Granted it basically only affects women, but it is basically a contagious cancer-causing agent.
Reply
+4
User avatar #23 - cantfindausername (12/29/2015) [-]
What's the difference?
Reply
+14
User avatar #26 to #23 - harrykuntz (12/29/2015) [-]
Cancer can either be cured or at least kills the host after a few years
Reply
+11
#75 - kristovsky (12/29/2015) [-]
feminism is autisms' south pole.
Reply
+10
User avatar #52 - theoldfritz (12/29/2015) [-]
Cancer is cureable
Autism isnt
Reply
0
User avatar #82 to #52 - XanicLyoka (12/29/2015) [-]
Autism =/= Feminism
Reply
+6
User avatar #98 to #82 - huffe ONLINE (12/29/2015) [-]
feminism is objectively worse
Reply
0
#102 to #98 - XanicLyoka (12/29/2015) [-]
Agreed. Radical feminism anyway...
Reply
+1
User avatar #110 to #82 - theoldfritz (12/30/2015) [-]
feminISM
autISM
its like, 75% of the word. why wouldnt it be the same
Checkmate
Reply
-1
User avatar #111 to #110 - XanicLyoka (12/30/2015) [-]
Because I am living proof?
Reply
-1
User avatar #112 to #111 - XanicLyoka (12/30/2015) [-]
And yes. I just admitted to having autism.
Reply
+9
User avatar #13 - fasthink (12/29/2015) [-]
What's the point in having a poll if all the answer choices are the same
Reply
+8
User avatar #84 - samoaspider (12/29/2015) [-]
thats because cancer can be treated scientifically
Reply
-2
User avatar #31 - moosaysthecal (12/29/2015) [-]
i actually voted on this if anybody finds that kinda cool
Reply
+7
#34 to #31 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
Reply
+37
#5 - psychotayto (12/28/2015) [-]
I'm not having kids because i'm not dumb enough to get a woman pregnant
Reply
-9
#53 to #5 - warcraftorc (12/29/2015) [-]
That's funny human, here I thought it was because no woman would ever have sex with you, but what do I know i'm just a orc.
Reply
+2
User avatar #95 to #53 - psychotayto (12/29/2015) [-]
I don't understand why everyone gets salty when a man mentions he doesn't want anything to do with women.

LIke can i just not want kids? why are women so important to you? There are much more fun and productive things to do in life than waste your time slaving to please a woman
Reply
0
User avatar #87 to #5 - imalex (12/29/2015) [-]
and this is why kebabs will take over
Reply
0
User avatar #99 to #5 - kjoni (12/29/2015) [-]
Bad day?
Reply
-13
User avatar #16 to #5 - platinumaltaria (12/29/2015) [-]
*smart enough
Reply
+2
#44 to #16 - bigndn (12/29/2015) [-]
**bigndn used "*roll picture*"**
**bigndn rolled image**i dont know dude. Have you seen some of the people on Jerry Springer. They seem pretty stupid to me.
Reply
-4
User avatar #46 to #16 - cognosceteipsum (12/29/2015) [-]
Why would you ever have a child.
Reply
-2
User avatar #55 to #46 - platinumaltaria (12/29/2015) [-]
Because for one the human race must continue...
Reply
+2
User avatar #56 to #55 - cognosceteipsum (12/29/2015) [-]
"You must have a child because you must have a child"
Okay?
Reply
+3
User avatar #57 to #56 - platinumaltaria (12/29/2015) [-]
You don't have to, but many people want to.
Reply
-5
User avatar #58 to #57 - cognosceteipsum (12/29/2015) [-]
Sadly
Reply
+4
#59 to #58 - gleb (12/29/2015) [-]
How old are you? Most likely once someone has met their opposite gendered partner they'd want to settle down and have kids. Funnily enough "You must have a child because you must have a child" IS a good reason. Humans are hard wired to have kids, if you don't want to have kids, your gene pool and the way you raise your kids dies out and there are less people who don't want to have kids. Nowadays it's not really important to have kids because it'll take a bit of time for the human race to die out but evolution hasn't realised this yet. So humans still intrinsically want to have kids.
Reply
-4
User avatar #60 to #59 - cognosceteipsum (12/29/2015) [-]
And anything beyond instincts?
Reply
+3
#61 to #60 - gleb (12/29/2015) [-]
But why should there be anything beyond instincts? Like I said nowadays with the sheer amount of people alive, it's not necessary to have kids for human survival. A common reason is for continuing family legacies; people want to leave a part of themselves behind, more through how they teach their kids than literally leaving a physical (child) thing behind.
Reply
-3
User avatar #65 to #61 - cognosceteipsum (12/29/2015) [-]
I never got that reasoning. Unless it's permanent, the mark you leave is worthless. Experience may not be worthless because it's impermanent, but legacy sure as hell is.

Well there ought to be a special reason if you want to put your offspring through the varieties of mental and physical sufferings the world has to offer. Not to mention what a genetic gamble it is
Reply
+2
#68 to #65 - gleb (12/29/2015) [-]
Just quickly on the second point. The world has so much more positive aspects to it than "mental and physical sufferings". Kinda sad if you see the world like that. Even if the mark is permanent it's still worthless to you once your dead. But since we don't know the meaning/goal/point of life, or even if there is/has to be one. Surely the point is to experience teaching and bringing up a person. I'd be happy if I worked in a warehouse then came home and just played games till the next day, but once I'm 40 I'm pretty sure it'll hit me hard how I've basically done nothing meaningful with my life. The idea of bringing up a functional and productive member of society is one of such challenge that it should have some worth on your list of things to do before you die.
Reply
0
User avatar #71 to #68 - cognosceteipsum (12/29/2015) [-]
I actually agree, to a degree. I'd like to foster children but to bring people who don't exist because of this gamble. Life can be made tolerable. And I prefer to be aware, creative, dignified than to constantly seek pleasure like that so I do agree, life is to be lived more dignified and to actually seek out struggle.
Ideal life for me: adopted kids, wife/girlfriend, train them mentally and physically with the same values as me.
Reply
0
User avatar #36 to #5 - creamgravy (12/29/2015) [-]
What if you want to get her pregnant though.
Reply
+1
User avatar #40 to #36 - psychotayto (12/29/2015) [-]
abort or run away
Reply
0
User avatar #17 to #5 - alarubra (12/29/2015) [-]
From the posts you've made in the last couple of days, I's say not smart enough either.
Reply
+19
#20 to #5 - samoaspider (12/29/2015) [-]
you try to sound like you have the decision over having sex or no sex with women
Reply
+2
#90 to #20 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
No one ever does. It's always the woman's decision in 99% of times people have sex.
Reply
-1
#92 to #90 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
1) Man has to ask woman out first, not woman
2) If gf acquired, you can initiate sex almost equally as many times as she does
3) vagina (a new word for your vocabulary just to startle you)
Reply
-6
User avatar #28 to #20 - psychotayto (12/29/2015) [-]
well i don't mean to brag but people seem to think i'm fairly attractive enough to date so i'm pretty sure i stand a chance if i tried.
But like i said i have no interest in doing that
Reply
+39
User avatar #1 - elvoz (12/28/2015) [-]
Odds are they already do have cancer if they follow Milo religiously.
Reply
+1
User avatar #83 to #1 - gohex (12/29/2015) [-]
I enjoy his anti-feminism stuff, but only for comedy value. In reality he's a douche, hides behind his sexuality as if it's a social shield, and I know I'll be hated for this one - but hates on atheists because they're so easily butthurt. I don't think that's the best reason to hate a group, because they don't like being poked at with sticks. I mean if they have poor arguments, or are a bunch of arseholes, yeah fine whatever, but because they are skeptical? Jeesh.
Reply
+1
User avatar #104 to #83 - elvoz (12/29/2015) [-]
See, you get it. Milo is a smart guy and has a rational stance against feminism, but he is a douchebag. There's no denying it.
Reply
+19
User avatar #22 - zenjion (12/29/2015) [-]
i'm fine with normal feminism, the kind that want equality, not the kind that wants women to be the supreme rulers of earth.
Reply
+1
User avatar #24 to #22 - mondominiman (12/29/2015) [-]
I'm fine with the ones thirsty for dick
Reply
+2
#33 to #22 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
sure
Reply
+6
User avatar #39 to #33 - thefunnyside (12/29/2015) [-]
Yes, because, you know, it's not like men wouldn't let women do any of these things for the past couple thousand years or anything. For ****** sake, the right for women to vote in the USA isn't even a hundred years old yet. Wait a couple hundred years and then you can complain.
Reply
+3
User avatar #38 to #33 - colossusshadow (12/29/2015) [-]
This is stupid
Men were raised to do these things
Up until women's rights if you force a woman to stay at home and watch your numerous brood of course they didn't grow up to do all these things jesus christ this is stupid.
You can't prevent someone from doing something and then tell them that they have to be grateful someone did it for them.
Also, MEN didn't do those things, people who WERE men did those things.
stop taking credit for the accomplishment of other men solely because you are a man.
Reply
+1
User avatar #48 to #33 - syntheticdoll (12/29/2015) [-]
And every single men who did anything was birthed by a WOMAN. Do we really want to state obvious things? Did you know that during the time most of these buildings were built women were seen as someone who's place is solely in the kitchen?
Reply
-2
User avatar #72 to #48 - hwaraam (12/29/2015) [-]
and every birth was ompregnated by a MAN.

morron. in having children, both aprties are putting 50-50 per cent exactly.

also, most men provide for the child to grow up and live.
Reply
0
User avatar #74 to #72 - syntheticdoll (12/29/2015) [-]
Virgin pregnancies, though extremely rare, exist, when the woman's body replicates itself.
50-50 is an interesting concept, I didn't know blowing your load into a pussy is as hard as carrying a kid for 9 months until it grows to be about 4 kilograms then push it through a cannal that only ever taken about 5cm wide things until then, potentially RIPPING IT UP in the extremely painful process? Yes, the genetical contribution is really 50-50 but are you seriously taking credit for something you never had control of?
"also, most men provide for the child to grow up and live. " Ye, because mother's apprently don't. They don't get up every 3 hours a night to feed the kid, they don't sacrifice 95%of their time in the first few years and they definitely don't go back to work after a few years, they just leave the men to take care of everything... totally.
Reply
-1
User avatar #76 to #74 - hwaraam (12/29/2015) [-]
yeah, and that's how J.C. was born. idiot.

And yeah, you invert more in the kid the first year(s) but the man puts much, much more. You talk as ifthe stupid job a woman ahs is comparable to the real job a man has.

Also think that all the succesfull persons in this world are men, and 90% of men have that strife for success, while most women wait for their prince charming to solve their ****** lives.

Carry on sweety
Reply
-1
User avatar #77 to #74 - syntheticdoll (12/29/2015) [-]
And you blocked me.... what an argument, that definitely proved you right... oh right, it didn't.
Reply
+1
User avatar #45 to #33 - oxidoferroso (12/29/2015) [-]
Probably written by some NEET to remind himself he's not as useless as the women he describes because he's a man
Reply
+5
User avatar #18 - gibroner (12/29/2015) [-]
cancer can be cured with a dose of toxic chemicals and radiation so can feminism but it takes a lot more
Reply
+9
User avatar #41 - WolfPrince (12/29/2015) [-]
Well there's no cure for being a cunt.
Reply
+4
#81 - stimate (12/29/2015) [-]
Well, I mean... if I knew for certain my child would get cancer, it would be easier to diagnose it in time.
Reply
+4
#79 - bigscarygary (12/29/2015) [-]
**bigscarygary used "*roll picture*"**
**bigscarygary rolled image**I wonder if they ever have support groups for feminists.

"Hi, my name's Kayti, and I'm a feminist."
<all together>"Hi Kayti"
<starts crying>"Quit raping me!"
Reply
+2
User avatar #80 - elcreepo (12/29/2015) [-]
At least there's a cure for most kinds of cancer, especially childhood cancers.

With feminism the only cure is growing up, and most people like that don't want to.
Reply
0
#67 - themonkeyfrompluto (12/29/2015) [-]
Most annoying feminists grow out of it, modt of the pictures I see being feminazi's are college and university kids, the whole point of college is doing stupid things and thinking you get exactly how the world works and what is wrong with it.

Cancer on the other end is a heartless careless bitch there to **** up your life.
Reply
+2
User avatar #70 to #67 - hwaraam (12/29/2015) [-]
Yeah, but feminism can ruin innocent mens lives and it doesnt have any backlash
morron

i preffer my own son or daugther to die instead of him/her ruining other peoples lives for no reason at all but hormones.

also early highschool is when you have that know-it-all attitude, in college you must already be an adult (at elast in theory)
Reply
-2
#93 to #70 - themonkeyfrompluto (12/29/2015) [-]
Also, i'm figuring you're calling me a moron?
Anyway on topic saying someone raped you while not being raped is a crime, it is a deliberate false accusation. Now we can go on for hours p, you're probably going to mention a guy who got in jail for false rape accusations, I might know a clear shut case of a rapist going free. The justice system isn't perfect.
Reply
+1
User avatar #106 to #93 - hwaraam (12/29/2015) [-]
Also, you can not get raped by taking care of your ******* self, but its not as easy to determine which bitch wont the crazed one who will put the false accusation.
Reply
+1
User avatar #105 to #93 - hwaraam (12/29/2015) [-]
You are comparing some forced sex and maybe one or two punches in the jaw to stay put to 10 years of jail and rape by other jail-mates and a life ruined?

Rape isnt as horrible as ruining a life.

rape is forced sex, and while it may be ugly and a crime, is nothing short of ruining a dudes life and not allowing him to have any decent jobs, and making him go to jail despite being innocent, where he will be raped and treated as **** , thus making a crimianl get out of that jail, ie. a new rapist is set free because he was incarcerated unjustly.

next time you comapre something as stupid and inocent as forced sex ie rape to something as grave as ruining an entire life, try to get some education first.
Reply
-2
#107 to #105 - themonkeyfrompluto (12/29/2015) [-]
Rape isn't just forced sex mate, it is as much psychological as it is physical. As much as you may despice it and can't grasp, there is a reason rape has such a high jail time. Rape has a high chance of ruin the vagina, due to the non-willing part and it can **** up any chance of having a normal relationship again. Again, i'm not arguing what is worse nor how to solve it but you really have a weird thing going on if you think rape is just forcing sex on someone.
Reply
+1
User avatar #108 to #107 - hwaraam (12/29/2015) [-]
And being with someone in a relationship, and then lying about them raping you just because you fancy so, can ruin the trust in the entire opposite sex.
Reply
-2
#109 to #108 - themonkeyfrompluto (12/30/2015) [-]
And again, so can rape, i'll say it and I'll say it again, justicial trials involving rape are a touchy subject with no sure way to distinguish who is, and who is not guilty. You have to take enough with the fact that the justice systems ***** up live by mistake, both men falsely incarcerated and women who's rapist go out free. But unless you have a sure way ro distinguish them these things will keep happening.
Reply
-3
#91 to #70 - themonkeyfrompluto (12/29/2015) [-]
A spoon in the wrong hands could ruin someones live. And you do not have kids, that argument holds no ground untill you actually do have kids. And well, considering hormones are the things regulation pretty much every emotion you will ever feel, you're children will be ****** .
Reply
+2
User avatar #50 - jontheknight ONLINE (12/29/2015) [-]
I don't get it, whats the difference between these two options?
Reply
+1
#21 - purdon (12/29/2015) [-]
**purdon used "*roll picture*"**
**purdon rolled image**
Aren't hey the same!?

Huehuehuehuehue i'm so funny...
Reply
-1
#27 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
Milo is a god
Reply
-1
#30 to #27 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
darrensankari is a fag
Reply
-1
#32 to #30 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
slycoop is cool though, and pretty sexy.
Reply
0
#51 - anon (12/29/2015) [-]
"feminist" really does have a specific meaning that does not pertain to the women that funnyjunk deservingly makes fun up. "feminism" really just means the same thing as "gender equality"; these ladies we make fun of i call "feminist extremists"

12>
[ 112 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)