**sherlockbatman used "*roll picture*"**
**sherlockbatman rolled image**
especially because he 100% killed Ras Al Ghul in the first movie too
Joker tripped over the balcony and fell all on his own. in fact, he kinda jumped over the wall and threw himself down.
that would have been the perfect spot to callback to the first movie
"I'm not gonna kill you...
but I don't have to save you either!"
he didn't feel bad about letting Harvey accidentally himself earlier in the same, damn movie

He also blew up to brakes of the train. No matter where you are, I'm prettu sure he that counts at murder.
Also, killed:
-A bunch of assassins and the fake Ra's Al Ghul rather than kill a murderer (who probably died too).
-Harvey Dent/Two-Face by pushing him out of a building.
-Miranda Tate/Talia Al Ghul and the truck driver by remote controlling the batwing to shoot at the truck.

Pretty good for a guy who claims to have a no-kill code (This is why the movie version of Avengers don't have them. It maked things too complicated).

You do realize this is all a hallucination from the Superman that Killed the Joker in Injustice right? He was put under a spell where his life would be great in his dreams. This is that dream.

which completely shows that supes is a total egoist.
his ideal scenario is a situation in which the harshest punishment is dealt to the joker who he hates, but he dosent have to live with/deal with any repuccosions at all. he wants to do the crime, but not the time.

true, but he didnt have to get the joker killed. its his dream, it could be what he wanted and he wanted the joker dead.

I read the comic, he is an egoist in the main story as well, does whatever HE feels necessary and dosent want to take on the consequences. he beats up the messengers of zeus, but dosent wanna fight him, he kills green arrow and expects others to forgive his "accident", he works with the yellow lantern core and kills ALL the green lantern core but he is ok with it.

my point is that, even in his ideal scenario, where he could imagine everything, he still wants joker dead and not take responsibility for the kill. i mean, its HIS dream, he could just imagine joker getting locked away and never escape, but nope, kill.

ummm dude, the point of the dream was that he DIDNT know.
he didnt remember all the stuff that happend IRL, thats why everything up until the point of lois dying was the same, he didnt know what was gonna happend.
the dream spell created an ideal scenario in which superman never experienced the loss of lois and his kid, by suppressing the memory and creating an alternate version.

i mean think about it, if he remembered that joker killed them IRL, why would he just back off for batman? why wouldnt he kill him in the dream too?
the reason is that in the dream, its as if it never happend, so he had no reason.

? i dont quite understand what you mean here...
my point is that supes is egotistical becourse in his ideal dream scenario, the joker gets killed just like he wanted, but he dosent have to take responsibility and can just do what he wants.
in the dream scenario, he could have killed the joker and the change could have been that batman stayed on his side, he didnt become a dictator and things didnt get so crazy, but nope, he'd rather let batman take the blame in his own ideal dream.

but dude, it is HIS dream. HIS scenario. **** dont happen in that world unless he dreams it up. its not like darkseid would suddenly invade the earth in his dream, killing millions, its HIS dream.

he intentionally killed the joker off AND made sure that he didnt have to feel bad about it, in a make believe world of his creation.

well.. joker did make superman kill his wife and unborn baby it`s understandable he sort of totally snapped

hehe, snapped

No he obviously cracked, you dip!

You'll never enjoy Injustice to it's full extent nor will you understand it's depth until you start learning the Batman was just as much to blame.

Batman was never "as much to blame" as supes.
for every bad thing batman did, supes did 3.
batman did some messed up things, increasingly bad stuff, but only as long as supes continued, had superman stopped, batman would too.
supes is the cause and menace in that story, batman is simply trying to fight a flamethrower with a torch.

yeah, his reasoning sort of made sense in the "i never want to see this happen to anyone else" sort of way
but crazy is as crazy does

I blame Wonder Woman and then later Sinestro, hadn't they egged him on he might have been able to be convinced he was wrong.


Also, **** Damian. The page where Catwoman tells him Bruce is better off without him and he's a bitch was so satisfying.

That's kind of the point. Superman is an idealist who's never seriously dealt with skeletons in his closet and was raised by a loving family. If he's never been tempted, it'd be easy for him to justify becoming a (in his own mind) benevolent dictator.

Bruce witnessed 2 of the closest people to him, his own parents, killed in cold blood in front of him, and grew up bitter. He set limits on himself because he knows exactly how serious killing is, not because of ideals (though I admit to not always liking his no-killing policy and how it lets criminals escape and continue killing).