Upload
Login or register
x

The fate of shit gerl

 
The fate of shit gerl. So a little while ago I shared the petition made against Bahar Mustafa, the woman who denied financial aid to white males at some Univers

So a little while ago I shared the petition made against Bahar Mustafa, the woman who denied financial aid to white males at some University in the UK.
And this morning I received an E-mail saying that she has been "Arrested over racist genocidal urging".
I'm pretty sure many of you already know since you should have gotten an e-mail about after singing the petition, but I thought I should give an update for those who may not have gotten en e-mail.
Well done FJ, you guys helped alot getting to that final push. I'm pretty sure we got a couple hundred votes from you guys and I'm proud.


You need to login to view this link
+2016
Views: 54492
Favorited: 68
Submitted: 10/07/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to becefalus

Comments(344):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12345>>>
[ 344 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
125 comments displayed.
Reply
+665
#1 - swirlytwirl (10/07/2015) [-]
I feel nothing but satisfaction.
Reply
-227
#50 to #1 - masterboll (10/07/2015) [-]
i see nothing but tears
Reply
+22
#265 to #50 - ubercookieboy (10/08/2015) [-]
>Going on Funnyjunk
>Be blue named lvl 300+ user
>Make an incorrect assumption about its users
>Appear to sympathize with racist feminist

MFW I'm not surprised your comment crashed and burned
Reply
+105
#130 to #50 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
Female tears
Reply
-191
#153 to #130 - masterboll (10/08/2015) [-]
white males crying in their masses and comforting each other is far from "female tears"
Reply
+45
User avatar #218 to #153 - olesaintdikolas (10/08/2015) [-]
Here have a red thumb cunt
Reply
-36
User avatar #249 to #153 - concetrationcamp (10/08/2015) [-]
You got a few people in here really butthurt. I applaud you for that comrade.
Reply
+45
#182 to #50 - marshallbowdrie (10/08/2015) [-]
I find it hilarious when someone with a blue name gets over 50 red pinkies.
Reply
-120
#189 to #182 - masterboll (10/08/2015) [-]
i find it hilarious when hoards of white males fill the oceans with their tears
Reply
+9
#274 to #189 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
Reply
+2
#277 to #189 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**You're not going to win. Just give up and go in peace.
Reply
+7
#245 to #189 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
I find it hilarious when ********* or women think they are relevant in the modern world.
Reply
+1
#253 to #50 - phaegitt (10/08/2015) [-]
i see nothing but a scorned minority or inferiority or both ;)
Reply
-2
User avatar #281 to #50 - enlightednatzie (10/08/2015) [-]
I may not have the same opinions like you but i have to applaud your for pissing so many people off.
Reply
0
#312 to #50 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
+1 Baiting
Reply
+1
User avatar #219 to #1 - parti ONLINE (10/08/2015) [-]
any backstory on this?
Reply
+38
User avatar #235 to #219 - slyve ONLINE (10/08/2015) [-]
She was equality chief or some **** on some university and denied white men access to meetings or whatever. Then she started using the killallmen hashtag and promoting violence against men based on gender and skin color, because apparently that is what equality means.

Now she got arrested for her ******** .
Reply
+2
User avatar #298 to #235 - watermeloncyborgs (10/08/2015) [-]
Wow, what a bitch.
Reply
+2
#295 to #235 - fudgeyfudge (10/08/2015) [-]
denied them financial aid
Reply
+7
User avatar #66 to #1 - talpss (10/07/2015) [-]
Yea, but if anything this'll be an example of why those laws are so stupid. But she probably won't the be final straw, it'll probably take another innocent, white man to do it. I mean, who's going to defend her besides feminists?
Reply
+2
User avatar #99 to #66 - bigndn (10/08/2015) [-]
Sargon of Akkad and Mundane Matt support her.
Reply
+17
User avatar #104 to #99 - talpss (10/08/2015) [-]
They support her right to free speech, not the individual. They do however want her to be tried for her acts of discrimination. I'm not going to be supporting her case unless they pull out an actual good argument.
Reply
-6
User avatar #117 to #104 - bigndn (10/08/2015) [-]
Obviously, but thats what i meant. They supports her in that she shouldnt be arrested for what she said. I never said what he supported her for but i thought people would know through context.
Reply
-1
User avatar #120 to #117 - talpss (10/08/2015) [-]
Are you saying I should support her position in this case because two other people do? That's rather odd logic. I think I'm going to wait and see her response to all of this. Until then, I'm not going to be against her, but I'm not really going to be for her either.
Reply
+13
#121 to #120 - bigndn (10/08/2015) [-]
**bigndn used "*roll picture*"**
**bigndn rolled image**I never said you had to support her, just that there are those that do.
Reply
+4
User avatar #122 to #121 - talpss (10/08/2015) [-]
Oh, okay then.

But wow, what a roll.
Reply
+4
User avatar #123 to #122 - bigndn (10/08/2015) [-]
LOL Im not really mad but thats funny.
Reply
+4
User avatar #101 to #99 - malachitecobra (10/08/2015) [-]
Sargon supports her right to say what she wants, but wants her to still face some kind of penalty for being racist/sexist for some event.
Reply
+6
User avatar #119 to #101 - bigndn (10/08/2015) [-]
Agreed. She should def lose her position.
Reply
-5
#250 to #101 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
so he chickened out
Reply
-1
#302 to #99 - enlightednatzie (10/08/2015) [-]
>youtube bloggers
Reply
0
User avatar #129 to #99 - heine (10/08/2015) [-]
8/10 made me blow air out my nose
Reply
+7
#227 to #1 - alboorack (10/08/2015) [-]
I saw you were lacking Murray
Reply
+1
User avatar #318 to #227 - themurrey (10/08/2015) [-]
whaa
Reply
+16
User avatar #179 to #1 - themurrey (10/08/2015) [-]
Hi
Reply
+26
#183 to #179 - swirlytwirl (10/08/2015) [-]
Y-you too
Reply
+19
#76 to #1 - boomerpyro ONLINE (10/07/2015) [-]
i'd say i possess a wide but numb range of emotions
Reply
+23
#162 to #1 - bohemianblasphemy (10/08/2015) [-]
Only together can we achieve great things
People should actually work together like this more often

Also, +10 rep for Sly
Reply
+8
User avatar #180 to #162 - themurrey (10/08/2015) [-]
And hi
Reply
+155
#55 - itsbeowulftime (10/07/2015) [-]




What's that I hear?
Oh, it's just the howl of JUSTICE.

****** people getting punishment is my fetish.
Reply
+2
#291 to #55 - ghustla (10/08/2015) [-]
I think it's so common between normal ppl that it's not a fetish anymore
still MFW justice
Reply
+35
#211 - thymarx (10/08/2015) [-]
This is what we can accomplish if we stand united folks, this
Reply
+44
User avatar #17 - slapchoppin (10/07/2015) [-]
now she'll cry in court and get off with no charges and get her job back
Reply
+28
#112 to #17 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
She's all ready pulling the "I've gotten rape and death threats" routine.
Reply
+192
#5 - pewdiepieisbestpie (10/07/2015) [-]
And now she will be enjoying a lot of white cis opressive justice boners. Who is going to cry now, bitch?
Reply
-10
User avatar #141 to #5 - snipys (10/08/2015) [-]
and by white cis boners you mean big black cocks in prison, yes?
Reply
+21
#185 to #141 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
Prisons aren't usually unisex so that's unlikely.
Reply
+2
User avatar #255 to #185 - snipys (10/08/2015) [-]
>implying the females won't have giant black cocks.
Reply
+6
User avatar #147 to #141 - pewdiepieisbestpie (10/08/2015) [-]
I don't think she will have that "privilege"
Reply
0
User avatar #292 to #141 - ghustla (10/08/2015) [-]
Niqqa prison is for punishment not free monkey spankey
Reply
+24
#204 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**wow.
Reply
0
#232 to #224 - notsohappygamer (10/08/2015) [-]
why not use this?
Reply
+1
#215 to #204 - bendingtimeisgood ONLINE (10/08/2015) [-]
The roll, tho.
Reply
+25
#30 - bigmanblue (10/07/2015) [-]
look while i detest this woman i still fall firmly on the side of free speech, as such i do not beleive she should go to prison or be punished by law for some tweets, fired yes, ignored by anyone with half a brain yes, but not punished by law.
and befor you say why protect her, quite simple, by protecting her right to free speech i also protect my own.
TLR shes a bitch but she shouldnt be punished by law for it
Reply
0
User avatar #315 to #30 - amuter (10/08/2015) [-]
Death threats aren't covered by free speech

Do you think a call to genocide is?
Reply
0
User avatar #337 to #329 - amuter (10/08/2015) [-]
First of all: "The Court held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is directed to inciting, and is likely to incite, imminent lawless action."
The "speech" is indeed directed towards inciting lawless action, whether or not it is imminent is arguable since SJWs have been building up **** like this for ages and it feels like it's only a matter of time.

Secondly: I don't think "Supreme Court of the United States" is relevant to the United kingdom or more specifically London for that matter. I wouldn't be surprised if they had the same or a similar law tho so if you're not as lazy as me in terms of digging through foreign laws I'd recommend that you do so.
Reply
0
#152 to #30 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
With ya all the way. Godspeed.
Reply
-10
#32 to #30 - anon (10/07/2015) [-]
*tips fedora*
Reply
+18
#33 to #32 - bigmanblue (10/07/2015) [-]
yeah free speech is ******* tipping fedoras....
Reply
+1
#108 to #30 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
Eh, I'm kinda split. While I'm supporter of free speech, "kill all white men" is radical to say the least, and can be taken as a serious threat to public safety. I wouldn't recommend her be thrown into a prison, however I do want to see this bitch lose her job(and future jobs) like any racist/sexist piece of **** should.
Reply
+2
#132 to #108 - bigmanblue (10/08/2015) [-]
oh yeah, free speach and all but not no consequences
Reply
+1
#201 to #30 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
I thought she was going to jail because she sent threatening messages. Even doing so with her school email. As in, using the email she's supposed to use for work and sending threatening messages. Free speech is fine, but you can't threaten someone harm.
Reply
+1
#238 to #30 - nagafever (10/08/2015) [-]
**nagafever used "*roll picture*"**
**nagafever rolled image** saying kill all white men is like saying kill a big percentage of cops which is defo against the law
Reply
+1
#311 to #30 - akselrk (10/08/2015) [-]
If i said the same thing about woman and black people i would get in a lot of trouble. Free speech yes. Freedom to hate and say "kill all men"... Weeeell..
Reply
+2
#70 to #30 - ninjaflapjack (10/07/2015) [-]
The reason behind free speech is the free flow of facts. Hared is an emotion not a fact. You can spread the same facts without spreading hatred. Hense laws can distinguish the two and punish people who are legitimately attempting to co-erce people into doing harm. This is the moral standpoint i feel that laws in many countries come from.
Reply
0
#261 to #70 - pebar (10/08/2015) [-]
that has never, ever, been the case of with free speech
because then you end up with government controlling what is considered fact and what is not.
Reply
0
#319 to #261 - ninjaflapjack (10/08/2015) [-]
Actually almost every country with free speech legislation currently has clauses for hate speech en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech. All of these governments have their own clear legal definitions on this.
Reply
0
#320 to #319 - pebar (10/08/2015) [-]
except the US, where our courts have defended hate speech time and time again

Reply
0
#321 to #320 - ninjaflapjack (10/08/2015) [-]
America has also got a limit on this of "so long as it doesn't promote imminent violence".
Reply
0
User avatar #323 to #321 - pebar (10/08/2015) [-]
IMMINENT is the key word there
Reply
0
#326 to #323 - ninjaflapjack (10/08/2015) [-]
The point I was making is that promotion of violence is punishable by law. The difference you seem to be arguing is the boundary point at which it becomes hate speech as opposed to free speech. On one end of the scale laws could decide not to stop anything which could be seen to be instigating any violence at all - imminent or not. On the other end of the scale laws could decide to stop everything which could be perceived as promoting violence in any way. I'd argue that both of ends of this scale is wrong and the only acceptable answers to this lies in the grey area between these points. Pretty much all countries including america lie in the grey area around this all at slightly different points along this scale. When both sides of this argument have huge positives and negatives who is to say which country's stance is 'right'?
Reply
0
#334 to #328 - ninjaflapjack (10/08/2015) [-]
The mistake you're making here is you're just looking at US law to determine who is right. The UK has always had a different law structure. I’ve just been trying to explain the reasoning behind UK law.
Reply
0
User avatar #335 to #334 - pebar (10/08/2015) [-]
so the uk doesn't have free speech

I understand that
Reply
0
#336 to #335 - ninjaflapjack (10/08/2015) [-]
... then neither does america. otherwise you Could be allowed to call someone a ****** to their face and get away with not being prosecuted.
Reply
0
User avatar #327 to #326 - pebar (10/08/2015) [-]
the difference is like calling someone a ****** to their face vs on twitter
on twitter, any reaction is not immediate so there is time for people to think

the restriction is about knee-jerk reactions, not the ideas themselves
Reply
+2
#139 to #30 - notafunnyguy (10/08/2015) [-]
I dont think she'd be jailed for long. But going to jail, even for a day, is enough to have her criminal record checks come up dusty for any position of responsibility in the future. Which, in turn, means she will never in her life get another opportunity at this. Simply firing her would mean she could go somewhere else and still do this, without being vocal about it because she learned her lesson. Firing her wouldn't have kept her from repeating this, only taught her how to repeat it better.
Reply
+2
#246 to #30 - toolazytoname (10/08/2015) [-]
Denying financial aid, and calling for violence against people based on their skin color and gender kinda goes out of boundaries of free speech though.
Reply
-1
User avatar #260 to #246 - pebar (10/08/2015) [-]
why.... because you disagree with her opinion?
OMG that's so far out of the boundaries of free speech
Reply
+1
#262 to #260 - toolazytoname (10/08/2015) [-]
Denying financial aid based on gender and skin color - Free speech. OK mate.
Reply
0
User avatar #266 to #262 - pebar (10/08/2015) [-]
she wasn't arrested for that
she was arrested for a tweet
Reply
0
#267 to #266 - toolazytoname (10/08/2015) [-]
Calling for a violence against group based on their gender and skin color. "Arrested over racist genocidal urging". Where is the problem? Isn't that punishable by law?
Reply
-1
User avatar #268 to #267 - pebar (10/08/2015) [-]
threats have to be credible and specific
general advocacy of violence by one person is not credible, nor specific
Reply
0
User avatar #293 to #268 - redandgreen (10/08/2015) [-]
I'm guessing that's why she's been summonsed. The court will decide whether this is protected speech or not because it could be construed as incitement and there were complaints..
Reply
0
#279 to #268 - toolazytoname (10/08/2015) [-]
Calling for violence against white males though twitter, used by millions, while having specific group of followers consisting of thousands, and share similar views. And she is arrested for urging, not organizing racist genocide.

According to yours logic genocidal dictators did nothing wrong, because they only said to kill people while others did the actual killing.
Reply
+3
#43 to #30 - therwasno (10/07/2015) [-]
..if u tweet permanently some utter **** like for example "kill all jews "..your tweet account will be closed down with a TOS notification ..same goes for Facebook..try it if u want to .. so why does not happened the same to that dump hoe??
Reply
+5
#60 to #43 - bigmanblue (10/07/2015) [-]
yeah but you dont get punished by law
Reply
+2
User avatar #294 to #60 - redandgreen (10/08/2015) [-]
You could be if there's a complaint to police and they judge it to be incitement.
Reply
0
#61 to #60 - therwasno (10/07/2015) [-]
iam not saying she should get punished by law i just wonder why no one at the twitter NSA came to the idea to simply bann her account..thats all..sometimes its is enough to report someone on twitter or facebook. hatespeech & nudity usually get instant bann
Reply
+1
#90 to #61 - bigmanblue (10/08/2015) [-]
yeah i still dont see how the killallmen hashtag is still a thing
Reply
+3
User avatar #140 to #30 - YllekNayr (10/08/2015) [-]
I still disagree.
Any call to do harm to another person is hate speech, and no longer protected.
Reply
+5
#107 to #30 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
People don't seem to understand the difference between "Arrested" and "Incarcerated"

If you go into a movie theater and shout "Fire!" you're probably going to be arrested in order to A. keep the peace and B. try and teach you a lesson. Doesn't mean they're going to lock you up and throw away the key. It's a slap on the wrist, you're blowing it out of proportion. She was literally calling for murder and she's only getting a slap on the wrist. She probably won't even lose her job.

Some laws may be retarded, but that's just how legislative laws are. Break them, and you have to deal with the consequences. Not saying that it's right, that's just how society is these days. Personally I'd rather see some kind of local Common Law system, but that's just not the reality.
Reply
+13
User avatar #36 to #30 - stifflimb (10/07/2015) [-]
I'm with you to some degree, but if she also been denying people who needed financial aid for being white or any color she deserves some kind of law punishment in addition to being canned, she did not just upset some people with a tweet but she activly can have ruined peoples education with her actions.
Reply
+5
#59 to #36 - bigmanblue (10/07/2015) [-]
i agree with that
im on the stance that she can SAY whatever she damn well wants, so long as she doesnt act on it
Reply
0
User avatar #231 to #59 - stifflimb (10/08/2015) [-]
To a certain point, depending on your position you should watch what you say, as in this for someone whos supposed to somehow be in charged with diversity to start spouting out racist **** is a no go, maybe not punishable by law but definately canned, as she was.
Reply
0
#239 to #231 - bigmanblue (10/08/2015) [-]
oh yeah
no legal punishment doesnt mean no consequences
Reply
+25
#19 - shadowrated (10/07/2015) [-]
hate that bitch
Reply
0
#313 to #19 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
Stupid Muslim cunt.... poor Europeans are losing their countries, lives, jobs, and educations apparently because of those worthless pieces of **** .
Reply
+22
#45 - ompalomper (10/07/2015) [-]
i can feel a raging justice boner coming on
Reply
+16
#93 - norwegianlolz (10/08/2015) [-]
Sign that ****** , hopefully helped in making the UK a better place.

Now you should do something about this asshole
Reply
+4
User avatar #103 to #93 - thempc (10/08/2015) [-]
the guy who made this needs to make a new one about ******* pigs
Reply
+3
#210 to #103 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
Cassetteboy vs David Cameron - Gettin' Piggy With It enjoy
Reply
0
User avatar #144 to #103 - Darianvincent (10/08/2015) [-]
He did
Reply
+11
#170 - therealkakashi (10/08/2015) [-]
Soft times breed soft people. If she's had such an easy life that the biggest thing she can complain about is straight people, then prison will be a very interesting experience for her.

Don't drop the soap.
Reply
+4
#171 to #170 - angryeggs (10/08/2015) [-]
Wiser words have never been said
Reply
0
#174 to #171 - urapooper (10/08/2015) [-]
does that even work in women prison? like if you pick up your soap next thing you know someone's fist is up your ass/cunt? or do they shove your face into someone's cunt.
Reply
+3
User avatar #194 to #174 - vonspyder (10/08/2015) [-]
Womens prisons are just as bad as mens prisons including in the prison rape department.
Reply
0
#186 to #174 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
If you're lucky it's just a fist.
Reply
+5
#181 - itrinx (10/08/2015) [-]
Ah the sweet feel of freshly made justice at morning
Reply
+4
User avatar #217 - zombiecreeper (10/08/2015) [-]
Lynch the bitch!

That rhymes.
Reply
+4
#167 - garymotherfingoak (10/08/2015) [-]
its a bit arrogant to say we were the cause of it, since she would have likely been arrested anyway without the petition, but you did the right thing in calling her out by making it.
Reply
+4
#85 - patriotpenguin (10/08/2015) [-]
we did it boys
Reply
+3
#240 - jokersaysamuseme (10/08/2015) [-]
I never understand "feminists" who claim they want equality for all but do **** like this and have stuff like coffee mugs with 'mens tears' written on it.

Reply
0
#306 to #240 - anon (10/08/2015) [-]
Simply put, you have actual feminists out there who do strive for equality among genders, and then you have radical feminists or sometimes better phrased as feminazis. It's a shame the actual feminists get **** for what the others do because of the same name banner.
Reply
0
User avatar #317 to #306 - jokersaysamuseme (10/08/2015) [-]
True. Thats why I wrote it as "feminists".
Reply
+3
#195 - infinitereaper (10/08/2015) [-]
Nice.
Now if only this happened more often instead of the opposite in this *********** of a modern society.
Reply
+3
#158 - botchtots (10/08/2015) [-]
This makes me so hard to know that ugly ass bitch's life is ruined
12345>>>
[ 344 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)