Upload
Login or register
x

The cop was 100% right

Twitter Lynch Mob Rages (liver "Racist Police
Brutality" glider, But Facts Tell Another Story DH‘...
Allow me to present a brief timeline of what
we have so far.
IO Girl is disruptive in class. Teacher asks her
to stop. Girl refuses.
20 Teacher asks girl to leaves class. Girl
refuses.
30 Teacher calls down to the office, again
asking girl to leave. Girl refuses.
all Gifts sends up "officer" who again asks
girl to come with him. Girl refuses.
50 [Wiper then tells girl that she needs to
leave, or she will be forcefully removed. Girl
refuses.
tik.) Officer grabs girl to remove her from desk.
She punches the officer and attempts to kick
free, flipping her own desk.
in Officer drags her from the desk repeatedly
asking her to put her hands behind her back.
She continually refuses.
Twitter condemns him guilty of racist hate-
crime. This is America.
...
+1968
Views: 56535
Favorited: 160
Submitted: 10/29/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to aangappa

Comments(760):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
12345>>>
[ 760 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
326 comments displayed.
Reply
+754
User avatar #1 - sickmyduckk (10/29/2015) [-]
Bitch deserved a beating to put her in her place. Slut should serve jail time or pay a fine for wasting the time of the people that actually wanted to learn something other than being a dumb negro bannana eater
Reply
-5
#497 to #1 - mrfloop (10/29/2015) [-]
"dumb negro bannana eater"? What the **** is wrong with you man? Not only are you a racist, sexist piece of **** , but you actually think it's okay to give a "beating" to a child to "put her in her place". I can tell you're a ******* sweaty neckbeard degenerate, the **** you've just said is only something an absolute loser would say, as if your username wasn't enough to show how pathetic you are.
Reply
-1
#758 to #497 - anon (11/03/2015) [-]
I agree that he's a racist but she's 18 not a child.
Reply
+1
User avatar #645 to #1 - detoxpain ONLINE (10/30/2015) [-]
I'm not gonna lie, I just laughed like an idiot
Reply
+1
#420 to #1 - ilovepawgs (10/29/2015) [-]
That was a beautiful testimony.
Reply
+1
User avatar #641 to #1 - dodomut (10/30/2015) [-]
spics and ******* deserve to hang
Reply
+2
#472 to #1 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
we can do without the hateful and racist remarks. I understand your personality demands you use them whenever you feel excused by other's misbehavior but seriously. Don't.
Reply
+36
#23 to #1 - musketusk (10/29/2015) [-]
What a balanced and nuanced opinion.
Reply
-23
#43 to #1 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
what a generic comment
Reply
+4
#530 to #1 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
you lost me at "dumb negro banana eater"
Reply
0
#761 to #530 - anon (11/27/2015) [-]
but that part was right at the end
Reply
+2
#464 to #1 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
People have a thing where they wait and look how far they can take things.
Reply
+4
User avatar #649 to #1 - SemiAnon (10/30/2015) [-]
Style points for saying negro banana eater instead of monkey.
Reply
+3
User avatar #627 to #1 - deadlyfoez (10/30/2015) [-]
In the situation of being inside of a school, it is always best to avoid physical confrontation. If I was the cop I would have just dragged the desk out of the classroom and dealt with her in the hall way.
"Fine bitch. You don't want to get out of your seat, then your seat is going where we want you to go."
I think escalating this chaos in the classroom did not help for the learning environment. Remember folks, there is always a better way to deal with things. This video is an example of the wrong way of doing it, even if it was justified.
Reply
+4
User avatar #335 to #1 - oranyonereally (10/29/2015) [-]
i agree with all of that except the racial part.
Reply
+4
#600 to #1 - anon (10/30/2015) [-]
Maybe you guys didnt watch the news coverage with his superior officer explaining why he was fired. He tossed her. As stated by his boss, proper arrest procedure means not taking your hands off of the suspect. Once he threw her willfully, he broke procedure and could be liable for a lawsuit. He was then fired and the FBI was brought in to investigate. Was on CNN with Anderson Cooper yesterday.
Reply
+1
#754 to #600 - anon (11/03/2015) [-]
and thus is the problem with society today. A white child becomes physically violent, attacking the person tasked with the job of keeping every one safe, and they will get this very same treatment; however, a child of dark completion does this and its racism to protect themselves and everyone around them. The media makes this into something much bigger than it ever should be. At least that's what this black man thinks, just the opinion of this here "negro banana eater" i believe is the term used. That was quite creative my craka. peace.
Reply
+20
User avatar #12 to #1 - polarpulse ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
She's probably gonna get some sort of fine considering she laid hands on the officer
-344
#35 to #1 - respirator has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+267
User avatar #46 to #35 - lean (10/29/2015) [-]
You are a cunt. When you are being apprehended by a cop, resisting is unlawful. And she struck him. He should have tazered the **** out of her until she shat herself in front of the class. Teach her some humility.
-41
#370 to #46 - gongwiththewind has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
+48
User avatar #383 to #370 - retardizard (10/29/2015) [-]
she clearly is hitting him when he's trying to get her out of her desk.....
Did you not watch the entire video or what?
Reply
+42
User avatar #396 to #370 - lean (10/29/2015) [-]
I saw the video. The "hitting" didn't really look like much but flailing about, so sure, that's not true.

By reputation of assaulting students I'm reading takes out the trash. Was it excessive? Yeah. Thing is, when you call in the police, they take law enforcement action. They are not there to look scary, they are there to deal with incidents that teachers or other administrators are not able to handle.

Reputation for assaulting students..... no, he had a reputation for being a hard ass. That's why hes the one called in when students aren't complying. Refusing to get up and leave is resisting arrest, idk what makes you think it isnt. That's like saying chaining yourself to a tree isn't protesting. When the cop was called in, the girl was already in trouble for disrupting a classroom (which they have made a misdemeanor in SC). I'd wager the charges would have been waived had she complied and taken her detention or w/e. Instead, she disregards a police request in commission of a crime. He hauls her ass out the same way he would a drunk driver refusing to get out of the car.

Bottom line is when you call the police to handle the situation, it ends up much differently than convincing the student to behave. Police are trained to detain and restrain as quickly as possible, how rough it gets is 100% dependent on the suspect's cooperation.
Reply
-11
#448 to #396 - gongwiththewind (10/29/2015) [-]
they did not call the cops... he was a resource officer that worked at the school...

resisting arrest implies that she was under arrest... which she was not.... thus you cant be resisting arrest if you were never under arrest in the first place...

cops have no right to break a person's arm because they refuse something......

end of the story is he was fired for taking the wrong action in this situation.... he should never have thrown her...
Reply
+9
User avatar #570 to #448 - obesehobbo (10/30/2015) [-]
resource officers are hired by the local police or sheriff. and they do ahve to power to arrest a student in a school environment .
Reply
-14
#450 to #448 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
wow, you legitimately have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

I mean seriously, at least google case law and police procedure on resisting arrest, you are 100% completely wrong on this.
Reply
+4
#647 to #450 - anon (10/30/2015) [-]
criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/what-procedures-must-the-police-follow-while-making-an-arrest.html

This is literally the first link you get if you google "case law and police procedure on resisting arrest".

>One universal rule police officers must follow is that they are not allowed to use excessive force or treat the arrestee cruelly. Generally, police officers are only allowed to use the minimum amount of force necessary to protect themselves and bring the suspect into police custody. This is why people are advised to never resist an arrest or argue with police. The more a suspect struggles, the more force is required for the police to do their job. If the arrestee thinks the arrest is unjustified or incorrect, she can always challenge it later with the help of an attorney, and if warranted, bring a civil rights case. - See more at: criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/what-procedures-must-the-police-follow-while-making-an-arrest.html#sthash.rjzaAVrK.dpuf

This is the very last paragraph.

I don't know why people like you are even allowed to live for being so stupid.
Reply
-20
#469 to #396 - jujuface (10/29/2015) [-]
"Police are trained to detain and restrain as quickly as possible"
They're people, not ******* dogs. Truancy officers know damn well that they're dealing with hormonal teens that make retarded decisions on a daily basis. Hell, if the truancy officer in my school was trained to "restrain and detain as quickly as possible", we'd have had a dead student every other week.
Reply
-18
#466 to #396 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
if you'd delete ur account we can all be happy
Reply
+7
#475 to #370 - amuzen ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
definition of resisting arrest
fleeing a police officer while being arrested
threatening a police officer with physical violence while being arrested
physically struggling to free oneself from being restrained (handcuffed or put into the police vehicle)
attacking a police officer while being arrested
providing an officer with false identification (either verbally or by presentation of a false official document, i.e. a fake ID)

She sure as hell doesn't look like she's calmly putting her hands behind her back and allowing herself to be arrested to me. plus she was definitely disturbing the peace so saying she wasn't doing anything unlawful is stupid.

He might've been overtly rough on her but even if he was it wasn't so rough so as to cause her any injuries (by a medical view point, not by a lawyer trying to sue's view point)


This video seems pretty bias to me.
All it shows is the moment he flips her off the desk and it shows that over and over with very little more with nothing of the events directly before or after.
also at the moment that lawyer started talking he immediately said 'there's no way she's going to be ok, she has a cast' which makes me feel like they're really pushing for one of those trumped cases where they sue the **** out of someone ruining their lives for some small transgression.
plus the reputation against him thing was brought up by the 'victim'
The only neutral third party they interview only gives us a 5 second clip of her saying the officer can be a bit mean but he's usually nice, which honestly if they wanted to get to the bottom of this they really should have more interview time with the witnesses. The fact that the lawyer is interviewed at all is kind of stupid.

Also if you look it up on other news sources, this girl only suffered mild rug burns so the lawyer straight up lied about the cast and all the injuries she suffered.


As far as the 'she's just a child!' thing goes, I think it's pretty terrible that she's being taught that she can do whatever she wants and not even the police can stop her because if they try she can strip away their livelihoods. I think that's a hell of a lot worse than her learning the lesson of 'if I try and resist arrest I'll get a slightly rug burn and be a little bit sore'
Reply
-9
#484 to #475 - gongwiththewind (10/29/2015) [-]
fleeing a police officer while being arrested - she was still

threatening a police officer with physical violence while being arrested - she was never being placed under arrest, only asked by the officer to leave the room

physically struggling to free oneself from being restrained (handcuffed or put into the police vehicle) - again was never being arrested thus never being restrained

attacking a police officer while being arrested - she never attacked the officer, her arms flailed AFTER he flipped her desk over.

providing an officer with false identification (either verbally or by presentation of a false official document, i.e. a fake ID) - this one does not even apply

as far as im aware rug burns ARE a form of injury....

PLUS the officer DOES have a history of violence
www.cnn.com/2015/10/27/us/south-carolina-who-is-ben-fields/index.html

the whole "officer slam" thing was from a DIFFERENT student in the class.

EVERYONE should have handled the situation differently
the student should have left the room when the teacher first asked
the principal should had just called her parents to come in and then suspend her
the cop should have not used such force, especially against a minor.
Reply
+1
User avatar #540 to #484 - motorwaffle (10/29/2015) [-]
1-3. The authority that a school officer has over students is not the same as in the civilian world.

4. That's down to your judgement, as you can't see much.

5. I have no idea where identification comes in either.

6. ************* . There are different levels of severity for personal injury, and rugburn isn't in the same league as broken limbs.

You have clearly never worked with students before if you think the parents of a girl who thinks this is acceptable are going to any good in this situation. And the officer used the amount of force that was required to remove her from the setting.
Reply
0
User avatar #568 to #484 - xgokaru (10/30/2015) [-]
In the video you see the officer removing the girl from her chair, she grabs onto it with her legs by lifting them up instead of straightening them out causing the desk to flip, while in the middle of the flip you clearly see her hitting him in the face.
Reply
+2
User avatar #566 to #370 - obesehobbo (10/30/2015) [-]
shes hitting him in the video dude. and who cares if you have a broken arm or not, hitting an officer IS assualting an officer. refusing to leave the class after the officer says to is refusing to follow a lawful order and resisiting arrest if she doesnt allow him to pull her out of the class room. For future referance, dont use **** sources like today news for information. you might as well watch fox news buddy.
Reply
-75
#100 to #46 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
Yeah that's why the cop was immediately fired. Because beating the **** out of little kids is what they're supposed to do.
Reply
+37
User avatar #124 to #100 - babasera (10/29/2015) [-]
so they are only allowed to beat older people?
do you think that young people can just refuse arrest and just walk away?
Reply
+8
User avatar #123 to #100 - gcloud (10/29/2015) [-]
well while i disagree with u and still think this video is within reason, he did actually get fired through an investigation of him being racist and having a bad reputation.
Reply
+16
#129 to #123 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
Except his long time GF is black, really don't think he is racist.
Reply
+13
User avatar #136 to #129 - gcloud (10/29/2015) [-]
apparently the teacher actually asked the students to start recording becasue his rep was so bad
and apparently he had a nick name of "officer slam"
www.copblock.org/145145/new-video-officer-that-slammed-student-has-long-history-of-racism-and-abuse/
www.cnn.com/2015/10/29/us/south-carolina-school-arrest-videos/
Reply
+4
User avatar #538 to #136 - WhereMehSammich (10/29/2015) [-]
Was he excessive? Yes. Did she deserve it? Yes. I don't think the officer should be fired or accused of hate crimes. He definitely should be punished or at the very least take some sort of restraint class or see a doctor for possible anger management. IF he had that rep, why the **** would the student disobey him. What did she expect? In my experience school police officers, it's not uncommon for schools these days to have 2 or more officers assigned to their school, have been somewhat violent like in the video. Like I said this particular officer used too much force and that's uncommon from what I've seen, especially with minors. Not only do officers remove insubordinate students, school administrators do it as well. Usually an admin or hall monitor will do this instead of the officer but it's not uncommon to see an officer do it if there isn't one available or if the officer is simply the closest one to that classroom. Also police are the ones who break up school fights the most because they have pepper spray. I've seen a school admin tackle a girl in a fight. ****** hilarious and they deserve it for being dumb ***** .
0
#133 to #129 - gcloud has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
-82
User avatar #125 to #46 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
She never struck the cop.

You believe everything on FJ?

There should not even be a cop in the school to begin with! Why is there a cop in school???

If this ever happened to my kid, I would kill the cop while his family watched, and then come back to the Philippines where I would never be arrested....
Reply
+31
User avatar #171 to #125 - somuchfreedom (10/29/2015) [-]
you wouldn't do **** to him you internet warrior pussy bitch. There is a cop in the school for one of a couple reasons. 1) the school has had problems in the past and uses the police to maintain order with roudy kids. 2) to prevent people from murdering those kids. She didn't get beat, she didn't get tazed or killed, she fell out of a chair and was slid across the floor. That's it
Reply
-55
User avatar #199 to #171 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
EXCUSE ME???

Who do you think you are talking to?!
Reply
+33
User avatar #232 to #199 - elvoz (10/29/2015) [-]
Someone with a very strong opinion but no information. Ignorant is a shorter word for it.
Reply
-46
User avatar #289 to #232 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Says the person with a cartoon avatar...

How advanced is your education exactly? How many years have you served in the military? How many countries have you lived in? How many kids do you have?

I am guessing you are the one that is ignorant...
Reply
+26
User avatar #299 to #289 - elvoz (10/29/2015) [-]
It's actually a weeaboo animu avatar if you want to split hairs, but regardless I fail to see how that is relevant to what I say and do. If I were to change my avatar to Martin Luther King Jr. would that somehow make what I say wiser?

Likewise the rhetorical questions you asked don't have any relevance either. I'm getting a strong vibe that you are merely baiting here. Considering the morally gray situation at hand, with a school's peace officer having to use physical force to enforce the rules and your vehement comments on the subject, you are either a master baiter or you are aggressively ignorant.

When an officer of the law uses force to administer the law, he is within the law to a certain degree. The situation provided is not one of the situations where he oversteps his boundaries and as such is, legally, in the right. Personal opinions of "oh he is so evil and violent I completely disagree with his actions" don't have nearly as much sway as the collective opinions that formulated the laws in the first place.

When you are the outlier it is worth thinking about whether it is everyone else that is wrong or if it is just you.
Reply
-26
User avatar #329 to #299 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
What law was she in violation of texting in class?

I am sorry, we NEVER had cops in school when I was in school.

When we were stupid, we got suspension.

Unless it was the D.A.R.E. program for a day and we got free shirts and candy...
Reply
+16
User avatar #351 to #329 - elvoz (10/29/2015) [-]
So you're gonna relate the modern scene to "when I was in school."

I don't know how old you are, for all I know you were in school in the 21st century like most the people on this site. But I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and roll with the idea that you were in highschool either before policing them became popular in the 90s or you were in a relatively small school that may or may not have been rural or suburban instead of urban.

So you have a student that isn't a weakling or a lardass that is breaking school rules. The instruction is to remove them from the class, so the teacher tells them to leave. Student says no and refuses to leave. Teacher can do literally nothing about it, regardless of their physical state, because it is against the law for a schoolteacher to physically force a student to do anything. That is why many schools have peace officers, not necessarily cops but with similar legal rights as them, for the handling of students that simply cannot be handled by teachers. Now the peace officer removes the student, through either force or coercion, and life goes on. Unless the officer brutalizes the student in some way or otherwise violates any laws, the student gets their suspension or w/e and the officer continues serving at the school.

The mistake you are making is assuming that all teenagers are somehow kind, benevolent, and innocent. These are young adults, and in urban schools where peace officers are needed there are plenty of these teens that are also violent and obstinate. When they act stupid they are told to leave and take a suspension, just as you were in your teenage days. Only they don't always listen. And like I said before: teachers aren't allowed to do anything so officers get involved.

If you are so ignorant or ass-backwards as to not acknowledge the changing of the times then you are the one that has the biggest problem. The world is constantly changing and trying to relate everything to your own experiences as a child won't help you understand what is going on today. You may not have needed the police when you were in school but that is no longer the case today. Your way of thinking is exactly identical to those who lost their slaves after the Civil War, for a comparison.

The world isn't a nice place. Your nostalgia not only doesn't portray the truth of yesterday but it isn't even relevant to the truth of today. Don't go claiming that something that is different from your experience is ****** just because you didn't have to experience it. That is completely ******** and I'd wager you already know that.
Reply
+4
#347 to #329 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
If she was in my state, she would be arrested for incorrigibility, misconduct, resisting law enforcement, and resisting arrest. Even if he had been recorded in my state, he would be found in his legal limits.
Reply
+2
#350 to #329 - fecalizator (10/29/2015) [-]
What fantasyland are you living in bro? Some of these kids probably make more money selling drugs in a week than you do in half a year. There is a VERY good reason to have a cop in the school. Things get dangerous or disruptive and he can shut it down if the teacher can't. Also, arrested =/= tried as an adult criminal.

I recommend watching The Wire, season 4 in particular. It's a great show and illustrates this very issue very well.
Reply
+3
User avatar #358 to #329 - shyyguy (10/29/2015) [-]
No offense sir, but it sounds like since the girl absolutely refused to leave after being asked multiple times, "suspension" probably wouldn't have worked in this instance, if that is what you are implying.
Reply
+1
User avatar #454 to #329 - Daeiros (10/29/2015) [-]
Yes, and I'm betting that when you were in school and people got suspensions for being stupid, they quietly packed their bags and left, maybe going as far as muttering under their breath and slamming the door on their way out. Students now, when you tell them to get out, are more likely to say something along the lines of
" **** YOU, YOU STUPID UGLY BITCH! YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO, I AIN'T SCARED OF YOUR PUSSY ASS, YOU CAN'T DO **** TO ME ******** ! WHAT?! WHAT YOU GONNA DO?! NOTHING, THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT, YOU NASTY ASS CUNT! **** YOUR MOTHER! **** YOUR GRANDMOTHER!"
or something similar, they can get pretty creative, they might even start throwing books at you, they might spit on you, you never know for sure, but calmly and obediently leaving the classroom without raising unholy hell is one of the more rare responses. Oh, and they talk to their parents that way too, so threatening to call them isn't going to be of any help.
Reply
-1
User avatar #690 to #329 - somuchfreedom (10/30/2015) [-]
yeah, and then some teenagers in columbine highschool walked in to that unprotected place and shot up a bunch of kids
Reply
+1
User avatar #542 to #289 - motorwaffle (10/29/2015) [-]
Seeing a whole lot of saying nothing to refute somuchfreedom's points.
Reply
+1
User avatar #444 to #199 - meganinja ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
A stuck up cunt apparently.
Reply
-8
User avatar #461 to #444 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Reporting you to the police.
Reply
+4
User avatar #465 to #461 - meganinja ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
For what? Offending you? At this point I'm inclined to believe that you're a troll.
Reply
-8
User avatar #470 to #465 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
For rape threats.
Reply
-2
User avatar #740 to #470 - meganinja ONLINE (10/30/2015) [-]
I love how you were a positive level before this content.

Good job you ruined your account.
Reply
0
User avatar #750 to #740 - deutschblut (10/31/2015) [-]
Are you serious?

You do realize that this is just a website, right?

It is not even a very good one. Mostly mentally challenged and uneducated people here.

Do you not have a life?

You enjoy earning points on a website that values raping and beating children, and I will enjoy playing with my own children, making love to my wife, and hanging out with my workmates and friends....
Reply
-1
User avatar #693 to #199 - somuchfreedom (10/30/2015) [-]
a bitch?
Reply
+27
User avatar #148 to #125 - gcloud (10/29/2015) [-]
u should watch the video, cuz she totally did hit the cop, very clearly.
Reply
+13
User avatar #173 to #125 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
A lot of schools have truancy officers, **** every school I have gone to has had one
Reply
-33
User avatar #191 to #173 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
I never said anything about truancy officers.

I was talking about police.
Reply
+13
User avatar #193 to #191 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
In my state truancy officers are provided from the police force
Reply
-36
User avatar #210 to #193 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Well that is disgusting.

And sounds illegal.

What backwards State do you live in?
Reply
+19
User avatar #218 to #210 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
Maine, but seeing as truancy is illegal thanks to compulsory education laws your statement comes across as pure idiocy.
Reply
-35
User avatar #230 to #218 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Oh my god. How could someone be so stupid?

Are you disabled?
Reply
+13
User avatar #241 to #230 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
Calling me retarded and not backing it up doesn't make you right. Man you really don't understand the basics of arguing or debating.
Reply
-34
User avatar #274 to #241 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
I never called you retarded. I asked if you were disabled, because I have never in my life encountered someone with your problems that was not.

You are the one that called me an idiot after saying such insane things like " truancy is illegal" and "compulsory education laws".

You already said you are in America. There are no laws that compel a child to go to school. My children do not go to school. And never will. It is our right as Americans.
Reply
+8
User avatar #313 to #274 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
I have literally made like 7 comments with examples of those very laws, all in response to your comments. You know its ok to admit you were mistaken, right?
Reply
-19
User avatar #363 to #313 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
I am not mistaken.

I am right.

You are clearly a troll or mental.

How many years have you been an expert at these laws?

I have been studying these laws since 1994. Avidly. You?
Reply
+7
User avatar #354 to #274 - theasexualgamer (10/29/2015) [-]
education.ky.gov/comm/newtoky/pages/kentucky-enrollment-requirements.aspx
You HAVE to go to school in my state. What backwards state do YOU live in?
Reply
-17
User avatar #380 to #354 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Why do you people quote links that you do not first read???

LOLOLLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That link says that children do not have to go to school!
Reply
+2
User avatar #408 to #380 - theasexualgamer (10/29/2015) [-]
"In Kentucky, under state law, all children must be enrolled in school between the ages of 5 and 18." Quoted directly from it.
Reply
-17
#412 to #408 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
"Parents may choose to educate their children at home, or in another form of private school, in lieu of compulsory attendance at a public school."

Did you miss this part on your link?

Not very good at reading are you?

You are proof public schools do not educate the youth of America.
Reply
+5
User avatar #417 to #412 - theasexualgamer (10/29/2015) [-]
Home school is still ******* school.
Reply
-14
User avatar #433 to #417 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
lol

And how is a cop going to see a kid on the streets, arrest them, and forcibly bring them to their home to learn, when that cop does not even know what hours or days the child learns?

Total lawsuit.
Reply
+1
User avatar #436 to #433 - theasexualgamer (10/29/2015) [-]
Cops come to people's homes when a child enrolled in a public, not home, School is not attending school. Not randomly on the streets.
Reply
-12
User avatar #458 to #436 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
So then after dozens of posts, name calling, and links....

I was right.
Reply
+5
User avatar #373 to #274 - scbyrd (10/29/2015) [-]
"My children do not go to school."
I felt sad reading that.
Reply
-19
User avatar #397 to #373 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Well you are a sick person then!
Reply
+6
#139 to #125 - iworkforlaughs (10/29/2015) [-]
there's extradition in the philipines isn't there?
Reply
+9
User avatar #190 to #125 - lathyrusvii (10/29/2015) [-]
Big words. Why don't you mind your own country's business, see where that takes you?
Reply
-31
User avatar #213 to #190 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
In English please?
Reply
+16
User avatar #216 to #213 - lathyrusvii (10/29/2015) [-]
Ich sagte, du bist eine Schlampe.
Reply
+9
#285 to #125 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
"I would kill the cop while his family watched"
Sure, mate. You probably couldn't do **** you fat keyboard warrior.
Reply
+1
User avatar #537 to #125 - vexille (10/29/2015) [-]
Edgy faggot.
I'd kick your teeth in if I heard you say this **** outside of your little basement.
Reply
0
User avatar #727 to #537 - deutschblut (10/30/2015) [-]
And I am reporting you to the police!
Reply
+1
#733 to #727 - anon (10/30/2015) [-]
Nice job blocking me faggot.

Enjoy your lv -400 ********** account and a blog on tumblr to throw your little bitch fits.

Cause if you keep going the way you're going.

YOU'RE GONNA HAVE A BAD TIME.
Reply
-1
User avatar #751 to #733 - deutschblut (10/31/2015) [-]
I am not gay. I have a wife and kids. And for what reason should I "blog on tumbler"? I do not even know what that means. English is my primary language.

Are you serious?

You do realize that this is just a website, right?

It is not even a very good one. Mostly mentally challenged and uneducated people here.

Do you not have a life?

You enjoy earning points on a website that values raping and beating children, and I will enjoy playing with my own children, making love to my wife, and hanging out with my workmates and friends....

I only have good times ;D
Reply
-1
#653 to #125 - anon (10/30/2015) [-]
"Why is there a cop in school??? "

Have you been living under a rock for 20 years? Holy ******* dammit
0
#421 to #125 - revenantium has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
-76
User avatar #127 to #46 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
When I was a kid, it was illegal to arrest kids...
Reply
+41
User avatar #161 to #127 - warbob (10/29/2015) [-]
are you ******* stupid?

are you telling me that if a kid gets a gun and kills people it's illegal to arrest them?
if no, go back to wherever you came from and consider if you should work on getting some common sense
Reply
+5
User avatar #425 to #161 - warbob (10/29/2015) [-]
wow I got blocked by him
Reply
-59
User avatar #185 to #161 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Excuse me???
Reply
+13
User avatar #341 to #185 - sovngarde (10/29/2015) [-]
You sound like a triggered suburban mom.
Reply
-3
User avatar #365 to #185 - nephtus (10/29/2015) [-]
 
Reply
0
#340 to #185 - mikekinkaid ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
Comment Picture
Reply
+12
User avatar #140 to #35 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
>SHE WUZ UNLY A CHIYUUUUUULD!
>SHE DIN DO NUFFIN!!!!

Maybe if she had actually had some discipline in her life, none of this would have happened, yeah?

Better yet, maybe if people like you didn't defend it, she'll know better than to do it next time.

Tell me, what would you have done if she continually resisted leaving, hit you, and disrupted the class?
Reply
+7
User avatar #119 to #35 - gcloud (10/29/2015) [-]
yeah were paying them to stop disruptive people like her, like wtf is ur point?
Reply
-22
User avatar #135 to #119 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Since when did police take-downs on children in school become ******* normal???

Why was there even a cop in the school to begin with?
Reply
+4
User avatar #141 to #135 - gcloud (10/29/2015) [-]
..to remove disruptive students, protect the students from potential outside threats, body check for drugs, stop fights. There's alot of reasons, my school had 3 officers.
but think about it this way how easy is it to take someone out a seat, when u need to take them outa a seat, it's his job to remove her. This couldve been easy for her if she just got the **** up.
Reply
+4
User avatar #174 to #141 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
Don't forget children are required to attend school, so he could also work as a truancy officer.
Reply
+1
#202 to #174 - saladiskilling (10/29/2015) [-]
I believe he was a SRO (School Resource Officer). [Usually] They're sworn law enforcement officers (ie. real ******* cops) that are assigned to a school to carry out investigations and enforcement of criminal law, like the school is their 'beat'.

They're not usually supposed to be involved in violations of school policy, or to be used in a disciplinary capacity because, again, they're actual cops and if they're assigned to a school they probably have other **** to do. It's probably not a good sign that the school decided it was necessary to involve him, but I wasn't there and I don't know if this girl had a history of acting out (from what I've seen...probably).
Reply
0
#276 to #202 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
I believe they said, besides being a resource officer, that he is a Sheriff's Deputy.
Reply
-22
User avatar #205 to #174 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Children are not required to attend school.

This happened in America.
Reply
+2
User avatar #211 to #205 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
The U.S has compulsory education laws. There are a few exceptions, such as for Amish children, that aren't required to attend, but it is required for all other children. I live in the US, I understand how this works
Reply
+1
#272 to #211 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
Amish have their own schools actually.
Reply
0
User avatar #317 to #272 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
I just mean they aren't required to attend a regions public schools, they can still be taught in a home environment, or private school. The only point I wish to make is that CE laws do exist in this country.
Reply
-19
User avatar #225 to #211 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
There is not a single State in the USA that requires children to go to school.

Most people in America know nothing about their country...
Reply
+6
#301 to #225 - saladiskilling (10/29/2015) [-]
South Carolina State Law: Title 59, Chapter 65 - Compulsory School Attendance Laws.
Reply
-14
User avatar #316 to #301 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Says you do not have to go to school.

Did you even read it before you posted it?

Or did you just type the first thing that popped up on google?

www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t59c065.php

What is wrong with you people?
Reply
+2
User avatar #249 to #225 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab5_1.asp all the ages at which a child is required to start attending school, broken down by state for your poor atrophied grey matter.
Reply
-12
User avatar #305 to #249 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Says nothing about children having to GO to school.

Like your other link, that you misquoted says, children can receive an education in a public school, private school, or at home.

There is not a single State that forces a child to GO to A SCHOOL. So truancy officers, especially armed cops, sounds illegal.

Not only is home instruction legal in all 50 States, most States do not requires days nor hours, nor a curriculum, nor standardized testing.

I am the sole owner, administrator, teacher, and phys ed teacher of my kids with full authority of the government and can issue legal diplomas.

My kids do not have to go to school. And I do not have to prove **** to a cop.

Read up some, kid:

www.hslda.org/
Reply
+2
#331 to #305 - saladiskilling (10/29/2015) [-]
You can rail on about the home school option and other exemptions all you want, the reality of the situation being discussed is that the events took place in a public school.

You think your little semantic argument is cute, like some sovereign citizen twerp trying to run around thinking he's immune to the laws because he saw a youtube video that offered him the secret get out of jail free passcode that only the enlightened know? No, you're just another fool, sitting in a dark room with a blanket over his head, imagining it to be the totality of existence.

Too bad about your kids, but at least they'll win the homecoming court, right?
Reply
-6
User avatar #377 to #331 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Are you disabled?
Reply
+1
User avatar #319 to #305 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
Once again you are using a biased site. Also I never said they had to attend a school, all I said was that education is mandatory. That includes private and homeschooling.
Reply
+1
User avatar #323 to #319 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
My argument has solely been about the existence of compulsory education. Also even if home schooled the state government has to be notified.
Reply
+3
User avatar #234 to #225 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
Are you retarded? Massachusetts has had CE laws since the 1800's
Reply
-15
User avatar #286 to #234 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
You called me retarded and then blamed me for calling you that, when I did not.

You said you lived in Maine.

Now it's Massachusetts?

Which is it?

Both states are in America and do not require children to go to school.

www.hslda.org/laws/analysis/Massachusetts.pdf
www.hslda.org/laws/analysis/Maine.pdf
Reply
+2
User avatar #309 to #286 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
That is not their state webpages, and is actually from a site purely against CE laws, thus possessing a major bias
Reply
-11
User avatar #348 to #309 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
It is a legal website. That quotes state laws.

There is no bias. lol

NOT A SINGLE STATE IN AMERICA FORCES CHILDREN TO GO TO SCHOOL!

It is a Freedom in America for children to have a right to their own children.
Reply
-6
#398 to #372 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
I read it.

It says children do not have to go to school.

Why do people keep attacking me with links that make themselves look bad?

Why do YOU not read it?

"Parents may choose to educate their children at home, or in another form of private school, in lieu of compulsory attendance at a public school."
Reply
0
User avatar #352 to #348 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
The site is run by The Advocates for Home Schooling, were as my links are all from the state's governing body.
Reply
-8
User avatar #403 to #352 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
My links put it all in simple English with links to the State Laws.

Your links support my stance and say you are wrong...

And?

Is this fun to you? Pretending to be dumb online?
Reply
-1
#605 to #348 - bobtombobbob (10/30/2015) [-]
**bobtombobbob used "*roll picture*"**
**bobtombobbob rolled image**I knew people arrested for not going to school..
better not roll a diaper horse
Reply
+1
User avatar #307 to #286 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
I never said I lived in Mass I just pointed out that they have CE laws, and were the first to have them in the US. Also I complained because you had no suppoorting information, unlike my argument.
Reply
-10
User avatar #339 to #304 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
You must not have read your links....

They all say you are wrong, and I am right.

Was there any doubt?

Thank for making yourself look like a fool...
Reply
+1
User avatar #349 to #339 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
Did I post links from The Oatmeal or something? What links is this fool reading from? All say that education is mandatory, in a private, public, or home setting.
Reply
-4
User avatar #401 to #349 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
No.

You said all children must GO to school, and can be forced by a cop.

This is not true anywhere in America!
Reply
0
#361 to #339 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
You are one of the most glorious trolls I've seen in a long time
Reply
+1
User avatar #262 to #225 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
www.maine.gov/doe/homeinstruction/faq.html question 3. Straight from my state's government website
Reply
-14
User avatar #293 to #262 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
That says children do not have to go to school....

Are you just trolling?

Come on. Just read the damn url for crying out loud...
Reply
+3
User avatar #303 to #293 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
It also states that they must be home schooled other wise, all I have been saying is compulsory education not public education.
3. Do I need to file a Notice of Intent for my 5-year-old child?
According to Maine law, school attendance is compulsory from the seventh birthday to the 17th birthday.
Reply
-11
User avatar #325 to #303 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
You finally read your own link.

So if one is home instructed...they do not have to_ GO_ TO SCHOOL.

Therefore a truancy officer would be moot, since how would one know if the child was home-schooled or not?

That is why that doesn't sound legal.
Reply
+4
User avatar #326 to #325 - sengo (10/29/2015) [-]
I don't even understand how the home school **** matters in this debate since the girl is clearly in a public or private institution and is not being home schooled
Reply
-7
User avatar #406 to #326 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
lol

You forgot what you were arguing about??? LOLOL

The silly idea that you thought going to school was mandatory and that truancy officers forcing kids to go sounded legal to you...

All 50 States permit private, as well as home instruction. I went to private school. My children attend the Wunderkind Institut. They basically just stay at home and chill.

Don't be jealous.
Reply
-1
User avatar #504 to #406 - kafei (10/29/2015) [-]
Are you seriously this ******* stupid? I've read so many of your (badly written) troll comments that at this point I can't tell.

Compulsory education means that most ******* children in the country need to go to a public education school because their parents can't stay at home and play teacher to their ******* kids all day . At this point, maybe your ignorant brain can understand that going to school is mandatory for 99% of the population and ******* truancy officers make sure those registered children go

Jealous has nothing to do with it. If most private schools raise their kids to be as stupid as you're making yourself out to be I'd take public education any day.
Reply
-6
User avatar #400 to #368 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
I am not gay.

And I read it.

It says children do not have to go to school.

Why do people keep attacking me with links that make themselves look bad?
Reply
0
User avatar #414 to #400 - theasexualgamer (10/29/2015) [-]
In Kentucky, under state law, all children must be enrolled in school between the ages of 6 and 18.
And I didn't mean faggot in the sense of you being gay. I mean you're dense, unreasonable, and stupid.
Reply
-4
#426 to #414 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Why am I stupid when I am the single most experienced, educated, and intelligent person on this thread?

Enrolled in a school. But they do not have to go to school. ie: Do not have to go to a public school building to take standardized classes and standardized testing.

Your link says:
Reply
-14
User avatar #200 to #141 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
How was texting on her phone threatening other people with drugs???
You are an idiot...
Reply
0
User avatar #459 to #135 - iexs (10/29/2015) [-]
It wasn't a "take down" she punched him and fell backwards.

I
Reply
+15
#54 to #35 - lenytunes (10/29/2015) [-]
**** that, she's old enough to know right from wrong... Oh **** , hold up, we have people with your retarded type of mentality that let kids slide with **** like this because "they are too young to know any better." GTFO here with that **** , I would've dropped kicked bitch right across the room just because of her attitude! She wants to act ignant then she can get her ass taken care of. Tired of these wanna be child thugs getting away with **** because you can't control them.
Reply
+3
User avatar #66 to #54 - mordenkrad (10/29/2015) [-]
Dam straight the sooner they learn the better, they can't gonna learn **** if you let them slide
Reply
+2
User avatar #122 to #66 - smartythechicken ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
i dont know why youre being thumbed down, but im thumbing you up. of course people shouldnt be beaten, but people need to ******* learn **** and behave while doing so.
Reply
+3
User avatar #134 to #122 - lenytunes (10/29/2015) [-]
I just have a thing about people trying to act hard, like they're untouchable. The only way you break them is by proving them wrong. I've been to public schools where you can't tell these kids anything. They disrupt class and since the teachers can't touch them, they take advantage. I bet you that class went on smoothly after that.
Reply
0
User avatar #144 to #134 - smartythechicken ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
yeah, exactly!
frm my point of view, it is possible to do anything. ANYTHING. some people see that and they take advantage of it.
for example: it is possible fr me to break the computer i am typing this from. im not gonna do it, but still. its like that thing with Breivich who is starving because he doesn't like the conditions in prison. there is a limit to how much a person can cause a fuss, but every person has the ability to be super ******* **** stains, as well as being saints.
if every person could recognize this and utilize it, the entire society would collapse because everyone did whatever the **** they wanted to. And if everyone worked together in unison to do whatever the **** they wanted... jeez can you imagine?
you could have 7 billion people running around slapping each other with dildos, but you dont see that, because people cant get along, and cant recognize their potential.
Reply
0
User avatar #474 to #144 - Daeiros (10/29/2015) [-]
Smartythechicken for president! He dares to dream of a brighter future filled with world-wide dildo fights, he believes we have the potential, and dammit, I say lets make that dream a reality!
Reply
0
#176 to #144 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
I'm sorry for mentioning but your post makes it sound as if people running around, slapping each other with dildos would be the height of unity. Was that a typo or are you just really weird?
Reply
0
User avatar #713 to #176 - smartythechicken ONLINE (10/30/2015) [-]
yes
Reply
0
#480 to #122 - jujuface (10/29/2015) [-]
Gonna play devils advocate here -
Do you think it's okay for parents to beat their high school aged kids the way that video showed? Would you beat your own kids like that? And lastly do you really think that would teach them anything the next time their puberty hormones flare up?
Reply
+1
#533 to #480 - lenytunes (10/29/2015) [-]
**lenytunes used "*roll picture*"**
**lenytunes rolled image**If I had a kid that was that disrespectful then I wouldn't be able to say anything because they brought it on themselves, but then again, my kids would never disrespect a teacher let alone an officer just because they want to look cool in front of their friends. That type of attitude is more dangerous than what the cop did to her.

But **** , this is Funnyjunk. Let this roll be funny for the sake of the site...
Reply
0
User avatar #718 to #480 - smartythechicken ONLINE (10/30/2015) [-]
Being the ****** up individual i am i would probably take away their phone, their computer, their current sex toy, their bed, their warm clothes, their shoes, sabotage the vehicle they need to use to go places, place old pieces of garlic around their room, and when they then would come home from school, late, cold and starving i would say: are you feeling it now mr krabs?
if they dint learn from this i would have to pay some money to send them to a camp or something. not a concentration camp not that im gonna have children anyway. not tryna be evil, but like i say, people need to learn. at some point theyre just too ****** up to learn anything from being beaten. im lucky i wasnt.
Reply
0
#723 to #718 - jujuface (10/30/2015) [-]
Well all that **** you just said is a damn great time compared to what happened in that video. I'm not even gonna address whether the cop's actions were right or wrong. His higher ups already decided that and he was fired.

But that girl got destroyed in front of her classmates. If it were me, I wouldn't ever want to show my face in that class again. She'll probably do what that man says from now on though, so mission accomplished if that's the goal. Not all cops, but that one man has her obedience, along with a raised heartbeat, tremors, and anxiety in his presence. Now if it really ****** her up, that may apply to all cops, or possibly all men. I guess some would argue that's a good thing. I would say this doesn't teach a kid a lesson, this breaks the kid.

Teacher sees phone, asks for phone, she's too proud to comply. There's an audience of 20 watching this. Truancy officer called, at this point she's in too deep, thinks her respect is on the line. It's pretty obvious what's the instigating her refusal, take that audience away. Move the class to another room and continue the lesson as normal. Get 4 more teachers or adults in there. Ask for phone, explain consequences, give it time to sink in how hopeless her effort is. Still doesn't work? All the adults in the room stand around her and do the same explaining, but way more aggressively, yelling from each direction at her. Make it the worst time of her life. 30-120 seconds of sensory overload before she realizes it's not worth it and hands over the phone, does whatever else you say too. May start crying. Don't try to hide this from other students either, make it clear this is what happens and you'll save yourself the effort from having to do it again. Super simple stuff.
Reply
-18
User avatar #245 to #54 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
It does not matter if she was wrong.

Why was there a cop there???
Reply
+2
User avatar #366 to #245 - theasexualgamer (10/29/2015) [-]
To protect children.
Reply
-10
User avatar #407 to #366 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Why do children need protection from texting?

How is it any different than typing on FJ or an e-mail?

I txt my wife every day on the bus and no one ever got hurt by it and need police intervention...
Reply
0
User avatar #409 to #407 - theasexualgamer (10/29/2015) [-]
Protection from Bullies, School Shooters, etc.
Reply
-8
User avatar #415 to #409 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
She was texting...

I doubt she shot someone with a text message...
Reply
0
User avatar #422 to #415 - theasexualgamer (10/29/2015) [-]
I'M SAYING THE COPS ARE AT SCHOOLS TO PROTECT PEOPLE FROM SCHOOL SHOOTERS, IDIOT.
Reply
-4
User avatar #431 to #422 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
SHE WAS TEXTING YOU IDIOT!!!!

SHE DID NOT ******* SHOOT ANYONE!!!!
Reply
-1
User avatar #432 to #431 - theasexualgamer (10/29/2015) [-]
Mmkay.
Let's get back to not caps lock. Your comment asked "why was there a cop there?" I'm saying they are there to protect children from school shooters. Geddit?
Reply
-3
User avatar #460 to #432 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
But it was a phone, not a gun....

What don't you get about that?
Reply
+3
#483 to #35 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
I'm with you man. **** the hive mind that is FJ
Reply
+5
#434 to #35 - lionti (10/29/2015) [-]
>check profile
>not -400
>not trolling?
Oh dear God you are an actual ******* idiot.
Reply
+6
User avatar #50 to #35 - mordenkrad (10/29/2015) [-]
So what's your plan to remove the retard from the class too., they asked and threatened this is not her home,this is public property, she is not the law here, the law is the lawall she had to do was walk out like they asked and go take the day off, relax and maybe get a tack or something, but no, bitch wanted to play hardball, so she got hard ball
Reply
-20
User avatar #132 to #50 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Public property=does not have to leave.

Duh.

We own public property. That is why it is public property.
Reply
+6
#186 to #132 - saladiskilling (10/29/2015) [-]
I'm going to assume that you're unfamiliar with US laws, what with your little German Colonial Empire flag, but public property does not mean that you can do whatever you want and no one can make you leave. It means that it is land and property set aside that public officials and public organizations have decided how to use but also what rules there are for use of said property. It is literally the police's responsibility to enforce law and order in public spaces.

For example: the roads are public but you still have to follow the rules that are set down or you can get pulled over by the police.
Reply
-12
User avatar #217 to #186 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
And what serious law did she violate texting in class?

Give me the State code so I can look it up.

Or link it for me please.
Reply
+4
#283 to #217 - saladiskilling (10/29/2015) [-]
I don't think that's relevant to my point about your incorrect assumption about public and private property but I can work with this.

South Carolina State Law: Title 59, Chapter 63, Article 3

I thought this would be the most relevant as it lays down the wording in how and why one could get suspended or expelled from school/class. Hmmm.....

- committing a crime
- behavior that is extremely inappropriate by community standards
- major misbehavior
- ongoing disobedience
- violation of the school board's or sate board of education's written rules

Oh, here's a link: www.scstatehouse.gov/committeeinfo/SchoolSafetyTaskForce/Title%2059,%20Chapter%2063,%20Article%203.pdf
Reply
-7
User avatar #332 to #283 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Your link does not have the legal section you quoted.

It also is not criminal law.
Reply
+2
#247 to #217 - kinginthenorth (10/29/2015) [-]
By being a student at the school, she agrees to follow the school's rules.
The school's rules most likely include a form of "no texting in class" or "Disruptive behavior may be punished".
Reply
-10
User avatar #253 to #247 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
And what Criminal Code was that?
Reply
+1
#277 to #253 - kinginthenorth (10/29/2015) [-]
The school's rules, the ones she agreed to by attending that school.
She's breaking the rules and was refusing to accept the punishment (leaving the classroom in this case). So she was forcefully removed, even after refusing to live up to the ultimatum of "Leave or you will be forcefully removed."

I have little patience for distruptive people in class. If they don't want to pay attention to school, they can stay at home and not disturb others. If you go to school, you pay attention and listen to the rules. Simple as that. Saying this as the most delinquent person in the class. But if they tell me to be quiet, i'll be quiet. They're the teachers, i'm not.
Reply
-2
User avatar #336 to #277 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Um...this was America.

Schools do not legislate their own laws.
Reply
+4
User avatar #145 to #132 - gcloud (10/29/2015) [-]
... oh u have no concept of the law, or what public property means.
Thats what ur comment has taught me.
Reply
-11
User avatar #195 to #145 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
Are you disabled?
Reply
-1
User avatar #526 to #132 - mordenkrad (10/29/2015) [-]
so by your definition, since she can do what ever she wants on public property, she can bring in a tent, some drinks, turn on a stero as long as it isn't over the legal limit, and basically set up?

Like it's public property that classroom, as long as she does not break the law she can do ANYTHING she wants?

6/10 for bait mate, I refuse to believe you are actually that stupid
Reply
+3
#130 to #35 - thrashu (10/29/2015) [-]
u know what u call kids who do dumb things ...... dumb ....stop defending people who are in the wrong
Reply
+2
User avatar #159 to #35 - obesehobbo (10/29/2015) [-]
>punches and kicks cop
>unlawfully abused
go back to tumblr you waste of human resource. its people like you that make take situations like this and turn them against the people in the right just because of race. please put your ******* ignorance to rest and stop trying to make anyone who isnt a black citizen look like a ******* bad person. child or not the law pertains to everyone, so i dont care if youre in a wheelchair, or a child, or god damn ******* 85 years old. if you break the law, youre going to be punished.
Reply
+1
#204 to #35 - slobiscuit (10/29/2015) [-]
**slobiscuit used "*roll picture*"**
**slobiscuit rolled image**You're right. But its the american way of doing things so its okay. At least here in EU we have some sanity left. upvote for you
Reply
+1
User avatar #65 to #35 - sixfivefourtwoone ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
She is a "Child" under eyes of the law, but she was not a child wholefully. Are you telling me that when you were her age and a cop was doing his job (After giving you fair warning that if you refused you would be forcefully removed) you would start attacking him, because you were a "Child" and didn't know any better?

**** off you pretentious cunt.
Reply
-12
#180 to #65 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
How the **** did she attack him you idiot???
Reply
+3
User avatar #182 to #180 - sixfivefourtwoone ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
She threw punches, also let's not forget that this "Child" is around the age of 17 or 18, which in most states, is no longer a child.
Reply
-11
User avatar #240 to #182 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
And never threw punches.
Reply
-9
User avatar #237 to #182 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
21 in all States, actually.
Reply
0
#282 to #237 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
Untrue Mr. Troll.
Reply
0
User avatar #312 to #237 - sixfivefourtwoone ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
I live in South Carolina. When you are 15 here, you are counted as an adult in the eyes of the law. You can be kicked out of your home, tried as an adult, drop out of school, and get a job. The video shows a clear punch being thrown.
Reply
-4
User avatar #353 to #312 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
It is 21 in South Carolina.

It is a US State.

Can be claimed as a dependent child on your parents taxes until 21.

Cannot drink alcohol until your are 21.
Reply
0
User avatar #359 to #353 - sixfivefourtwoone ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
Wow, thanks. I didn't know you knew more about the laws than I did with the state I live in. There is a state website you know, you can go to it to learn more about laws and jurisdiction. The only parts you got right in that were that we are a US state and alcohol cannot be purchased/drank unless you are 21 (with the exception of being 18, on your own property, and under the supervision of your parents.)

Clearly you don't know your facts and just want to prove yourself, so this will be my last comment. Have a good day
Reply
0
User avatar #402 to #359 - deutschblut (10/29/2015) [-]
I am an expert in laws relating to all US States, and many counties and cities as well. Also the laws in several dozen nations around the world.
Reply
-1
#580 to #402 - anon (10/30/2015) [-]
liar liar pants on fire
Reply
-1
User avatar #508 to #402 - kafei (10/29/2015) [-]
And I have an uncle that works at Nintendo.
Reply
+1
#522 to #35 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
there is a fine line between actual police brutality and just plain refusing to comply

the people pushing "muh racism" and black oppression need to stop.
Reply
+1
User avatar #375 to #35 - invalidcupcake (10/29/2015) [-]
hi tumblr
Reply
+1
User avatar #298 to #35 - hurpfry (10/29/2015) [-]
Level 142 comments??? And you're not a troll? I don't understand, how can it be possible to be THIS stupid?
Reply
0
User avatar #441 to #35 - deaminzaints (10/29/2015) [-]
its not ******* unlawfully when you are purposefully trying to provoke a reaction by being un-cooperative
Reply
0
#279 to #35 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
Yeaa man **** the poh-leece and **** the system. Anarchy 4 life.
Reply
-2
User avatar #487 to #35 - alabamacoffeebean (10/29/2015) [-]
Shut up, homo
Reply
+2
User avatar #621 to #1 - mvnnvm (10/30/2015) [-]
This isn't racism, it's equality. If blacks can call us whitey and cracker and always pull the race card, we can call them dumb negro banana eaters. I would give you every thumb I would ever use in my life if I could.
Reply
-3
User avatar #651 to #1 - shinyarmor ONLINE (10/30/2015) [-]
666 UP DOOTS. pls no more. its one, point proven.
Reply
+1
User avatar #652 to #651 - DeathclawRulez (10/30/2015) [-]
too late
Reply
+3
User avatar #481 to #1 - spearmint (10/29/2015) [-]
Sigh... "Negro banana eater?"

FJ wasn't always like this
Reply
+2
#665 to #481 - anon (10/30/2015) [-]
Yes it was newfag
Reply
+1
User avatar #633 to #481 - ilovehitler (10/30/2015) [-]
It has become a much better place, hasn't it? One ready and eager for purification.
Reply
+100
#2 to #1 - realmanbraum (10/29/2015) [-]
never seen a comment so racist and pro-education.
Reply
+6
User avatar #22 to #2 - sickreality (10/29/2015) [-]
lol he said banana eater
Reply
+6
User avatar #27 to #2 - therealtjthemedic (10/29/2015) [-]
Two pretty contradictory opinions.
Reply
-9
#41 to #27 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
how so? you think nazis had no education or uncivilized? racism party comes from narcissism and narcissistic people often proud of their intelligence and education
Reply
-7
#42 to #41 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
partly* and the rest is ****** up too but whatever
Reply
0
User avatar #59 to #42 - therealtjthemedic (10/29/2015) [-]
Eh, I believe that even very narcissistic people would not be racist if they took a more say, scientific approach to everything. By actually looking at the evidence, and no, that doesn't mean searching for evidence that proves your side, but looking at allevidence, and making conclusions based on that.
Reply
-1
#747 to #59 - anon (10/30/2015) [-]
well what defines 'all evidence'

is it just limited to actual facts and information that show certain races are in fact less evolved and have done little to nothing to progress their cultures in any way, or ae we to include the afro-centrist rewrites to invent history for blacks based on things they never actually did or embellishing on tiny involvements

like how said afrocentrists try to claim it was africans who invented all the things arabs had and try to claim egyptians were originally black
Reply
+82
#44 - destinct (10/29/2015) [-]
This is one of those things where I'm kind of stuck in the middle.
I agree that force was necessary to remove the girl from the classroom as well as the fact that she's a disruptive bitch. HOWEVER, the cop went way over board with said "force", he could have simply pulled her by the arm out of the chair but he instead flips the desk over with her in it and drags her across the floor and tosses her over to the wall to flip her over.
I'm all for karmic justice but that's a bit overkill for a 14 year old kid against a grown man.
But then again what do i know.
Reply
0
User avatar #583 to #44 - petresko (10/30/2015) [-]
If she was in a regular chair you'd have a point,but it's a desk-chair abomination,she could just lock her legs in,so IMO the officer did the right thing.
Also cops are trained to be violent,so if you call an officer you'd expect **** to go down.If an officer encounters violence he'd respond with violence because he should not underestimate the threat.

I don't care what # *********** folks have to say.The fact that the video doesn't show any backstory before this only adds to opinion splitting and since nobody in the classroom is defending her I assume she's been acting like a self-righteous cunt.
Reply
+5
#167 to #44 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
her legs were caught in the desk. he didnt flip the desk, her body was still inside of it which why it flipped.
Reply
+7
User avatar #79 to #44 - jzwangpk (10/29/2015) [-]
He didn't flip the desk; if you watch the video closely she tries to stay down while he's pulling her forward and the desk flips. Not a deliberate action on the part of either person.

I agree that it's a bit overkill though. I think the officer lost it a bit.
Reply
+13
#175 to #79 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
You're right on this. Her kicking and screaming is what caused the desk to flip. The only force he initially used was pulling her out of her desk. The "brutality" that follows is a by-product of her being a spoiled brat. I she'd just chilled the **** out and let him remove her from the classroom nothing would have happened.

He didn't deserve to lose his job over this.
Reply
+5
User avatar #297 to #175 - jzwangpk (10/29/2015) [-]
The fact of the matter is, when a cop tells you to do something, ******* do it. Noncompliance directed at your teacher is one thing; noncompliance directed at a LEO is a whole 'nother ball game. A ball game in which you just get hit in the face with the ball. Repeatedly.
Reply
0
User avatar #517 to #297 - kafei (10/29/2015) [-]
I really think we need to revamp the educational system to where teachers have a bit more power. The way it is now, it's not much wonder kids don't want to listen to them; they know they're weaker than their own parents, and how do you suppose most of the brats like these act at home?
Reply
+3
#151 to #44 - zionsype (10/29/2015) [-]
Let me give you a better picture
Reply
0
#411 to #151 - destinct (10/29/2015) [-]
Thanks bro!
Reply
+23
#75 - jwalton (10/29/2015) [-]
What punch?
Reply
+200
User avatar #39 - junkinator (10/29/2015) [-]
Seriously, tho. He didn't have to go balls to the wall with this. She was a rowdy 14 year old girl, not some jacked dude in the crips acting up. So what if she flailed her arms? This dude literally threw her across the room.

I'm not saying it was it was because she's black and that's why he deserves to be fired, I'm saying he deserves to be fired for using such poor judgement to get her out. Like some little girls a threat. Just grab that ****** arm and pull her up. And I feel like those of you who are sucking this cops dick just haven't seen the video. ***** pretty harsh for a kid
Reply
+1
#111 to #39 - blurog (10/29/2015) [-]
No, there is a point where he has to use more force. There are also time when even being gentle if they twist the wrong way they will do themselves far more harm then he did. Have you ever tried getting someone out of a seat gently while they are flailing around and hitting you? He was called to remove a noncompliant individual girl from a room where she was only hurting the education of the other kids, which as it stands today in america is just getting worse. So he tried to be nice and she forced him to react the way he did. It could have been far worse but it wasnt, because unlike many people here, he actually used common sense.
Reply
0
#251 to #111 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
If you're capable of throwing someone across the room, you're capable of dealing with the situation with less force as well. There's no good reason to use excessive force, ever.
Reply
+1
User avatar #495 to #39 - niggastolemyname (10/29/2015) [-]
that's such a ******* cop out; you can see the girl's leg locks to the top of the desk when he tries to pull her up. Plus apparently he shouldn't have even pulled her out to start with because he was supposed to waste more time issuing out 'pain complaince'
Reply
0
User avatar #150 to #39 - taydem (10/29/2015) [-]
bro you are on funnyjunk. Bunch of Hitler lovers. What do you expect.
Reply
+5
User avatar #226 to #150 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
Wow, it's almost like Funnyjunk is a diverse place with a dynamic userbase.
Reply
+24
User avatar #254 to #226 - failtolawl (10/29/2015) [-]
careful there. Diverse is a trigger word for the neo-nazi sub-community.
Reply
-1
#410 to #254 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
tell them to go back to /pol/, its an original response that works everytime you see any opinion that isn't full blown leftcuck.

also call them a stormfag, that will show the ebil rasists whats up.
Reply
0
#419 to #410 - failtolawl (10/29/2015) [-]
"tell them to go back to /pol/, its an original response "

"full blown leftcuck. "



"its an original response"




"full blown leftcuck"







"original response"
Reply
0
#452 to #419 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
Hey, I'm not the one whining about le pol circlejeerk may may
Reply
0
#362 to #254 - anygoodnames (10/29/2015) [-]
Indeed. Makes us gaseous.
Reply
+1
User avatar #634 to #150 - ilovehitler (10/30/2015) [-]
I have absolutely no idea what you may be referring to by "Hitler lovers".
Reply
+2
#405 to #39 - youregaylol (10/29/2015) [-]
nah, thats stupid.

she was very clearly resisting arrest, and lets be honest, you're not a cop and you have no training or experience in any field to be lecturing officers or anyone on how to restrain someone.

you're internet quarterbacking and talking out of your asshole m8, just a bit.

no offense of course.
Reply
+2
#165 to #39 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
threw her across the room? are you fcking blind? her legs were still caught in the desk so when the cop pulled her up the desk fell over. use your eyes u dumb cunt.
Reply
+4
#197 to #39 - heartlessrobot (10/29/2015) [-]
If a police officer asks you to be reasonable, and you respond by physically assaulting the officer, I don't care if you're a quadriplegic midgit with down syndrome, you've got an ass-beating coming your way.
Reply
+2
User avatar #488 to #39 - iexs (10/29/2015) [-]
I think he was a little rough, but it looks like he kept her from hitting the floor hard by holding onto the desk, then he slid her across the tile so he could handcuff her.

I think it looks worse than it is.
Reply
+12
#91 to #39 - jleblucypher (10/29/2015) [-]
Finally some sense
Finally some sense
Reply
+8
User avatar #147 to #39 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
He wasn't treating her like some kid, though; he was treating her like a criminal, which she was for assaulting a police officer. It doesn't matter if it's a Mike Tyson punch to a slap in the face, assault is assault, and criminals get treated the same way when they resist.
Reply
+14
User avatar #192 to #147 - mrblueftw (10/29/2015) [-]
cops are supposed to be the bigger man, not "he started it". Christ grab the bitches arms and pull her out but dont ******* WWE wrestle her and throw her down in a desk and then flip her.
Reply
+2
User avatar #220 to #192 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
Where the **** did you hear that?
Where in ANYWHERE in the job description does it state they have to be the 'bigger person'? What? Of course they have a moral duty to uphold the law, but that's exactly what he's doing. You're making it sound like he should be smacked by some frantic woman or spit on by a jerk and just say "Well whatever, man, I'm the bigger person". **** off with that ******** .

For future reference, the only thing moral highground protects you against is your own ego, it sure as **** doesn't stop anyone from smacking you upside the head or walking all over you.
Reply
+1
User avatar #227 to #220 - mrblueftw (10/29/2015) [-]
>walking all over you
yeah, that girl could have slapped his ******* head off. with her, skin n **** .
and yes, being a bigger person is part of being a cop. you cant enforce the rules if you arent the bigger person. did i say he should be spit on, or slapped? **** off with that strawman argument.
Reply
+2
User avatar #243 to #227 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
It's not a matter of what she could do, it's what she did, and she DID assault an officer, and WAS taken down for it. Wow, it's almost like there's a system for dealing with criminals, hm?

No it isn't, at least not the way you're describing it, because being the bigger person has nothing to do with letting yourself get kicked and slapped in the face. It doesn't MATTER how hard it was, it was the fact that it happened, and thus she's a criminal.

No you didn't, but that's the way you're describing it. Being the bigger person = letting someone hit you.
Reply
+2
User avatar #259 to #243 - mrblueftw (10/29/2015) [-]
yes, a system that involves taking down unruly suspects, not back flipping a highschooler and flipping her upside down. yes it happened, but was this the correct response? hell no. and i still never said bigger person=let someone hit you. Using a reasonable amount of force against a highschooler after getting slapped is being a bigger person.
Reply
+2
User avatar #291 to #259 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
Someone who commits assault counts as an 'unruly suspect', that's what you don't seem to understand. You're also exaggerating.

Yes it was the correct response.
Yes you did. Do you suffer from a learning disorder? Have you constantly failed English? What in your brain makes you incapable of understanding implications? If I said everyone with an avatar of a blue and white mask is a faggot, I would be effectively calling you a faggot, whether or not I explicitly said it. What you're saying equates to "If he was the bigger person, he wouldn't have reacted badly to the assault. What?! No, I NEVER said bigger people shouldn't react badly to assault!" Here, I will even bring your own sentences so you can't dodge it anymore:

"cops are supposed to be the bigger man, not "he started it""
^You when I said he reacted accordingly
"yeah, that girl could have slapped his ******* head off. with her, skin n **** . "
^You implying that it somehow 'didn't count' as assault
Mixing these grand statements together, you get "Police officers should be the bigger person against minor assault", which is still not true. Assault is assault, and a criminal is a criminal, the only difference between them at that point is how easily they enter custody, and when someone resists, they get taken down with force.

Are you somehow more clear with your own words, now?

At the end of this, your biggest gripe seems to be that you don't understand what assault is or seem to think that until a certain size/weight, it doesn't 'count' as assault. You're defending this because she's clearly a highschool girl, if she was just in the street making a ruckus and attacked a police officer, would you still defend her? Something in your brain just seems incapable as registering slapping + kicking as assault. Unfortunate for you, but not for me. I hope you can one day rectify this disorder of yours, but until then, I will bask in the knowledge that I am right and he reacted accordingly.
Reply
0
User avatar #306 to #291 - mrblueftw (10/29/2015) [-]
"exaggerating"
explain what happened in the video.

You implying that it somehow 'didn't count' as assault
where did i say that? i said it couldn't have hurt him, he didn't need to flip her.
and yeah, mixing my statements together is still a strawman. and yes, i believe "Police officers should be the bigger person against minor assault" because what the **** is that girl gonna do to him? have some human emotions and realize that a highschooler and a gangbanger are two different people, with two different amounts of strength. i never said it doesnt count as assault, again, another strawman. I said that different amounts of force should be used to apprehend the criminals, ex) flipping a high school girl in her desk. No i wouldn't defend her in the streets, because that's a completely different situation. its not in a school, and the officer probably wouldn't have flipped her upside down, like he did in the video. slapping+kicking is assault, i never said it wasn't, so stop you fedora tipping "i will bask in my superior strawman skills". ending a argument with "I'm right, your wrong" is just plain childish.

And oh boy, the personal attacks. the number 1 thing that sealed the deal of this argument. grow up.
Reply
0
User avatar #310 to #306 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
I will grow up right after you learn what a criminal is, and what assault is
Reply
0
User avatar #314 to #310 - mrblueftw (10/29/2015) [-]
I am not even arguing about what assault is, and im not arguing that shes not a criminal. I'm arguing the amount of force used to take her down.
Reply
0
User avatar #318 to #314 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
And what about it wasn't appropriate? If someone is resisting a lawful order, you are allowed to use reasonable force (ergo: As much as necessary) to make it happen (As much as necessary refers to how much force is used to gain both compliance and protection. Do you think if he used less that she would have listened? Do you think she would have stopped hitting him?)
Reply
+2
User avatar #321 to #318 - mrblueftw (10/29/2015) [-]
he could have had used less force and still brought her down. are you implying that there is no other way to take a high school student out of a chair than by flipping her desk backwards? Again, it was not necessary, it was a unwarranted use of way to much force.
Reply
0
User avatar #328 to #321 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
She flipped herself back, by the looks of it, then he just dragged it over to the door and dragged her out. That's practically nothing. A rather common trend with these types of things, that is, police neutralization, that the suspects injure themselves by resisting more than the police wound them. Nothing different here.
Reply
0
User avatar #330 to #328 - mrblueftw (10/29/2015) [-]
she flipped herself, not, you know, the officer dragging her down.
Reply
0
User avatar #334 to #330 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
Yeah, I'm glad we got that covered. Also, considering the center of his gravity was well above hers, he wouldn't be very good at 'dragging her down'. You make it sound like he grabbed her desk with her in it and flung it across the room.
Reply
0
User avatar #337 to #334 - mrblueftw (10/29/2015) [-]
thats actually quite the description on what he did, thanks for paraphrasing that for me.
Reply
0
User avatar #338 to #337 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
And yet he didn't do anything of the sort. Did you even watch the video, or are you just trusting the words of sensitive people?
Reply
0
User avatar #342 to #338 - mrblueftw (10/29/2015) [-]
of who?
everyone on this website circle jerks cops, so much that when a cop does an actual bad thing that they pass it off like the others.
Reply
0
User avatar #346 to #342 - captainfuckitall (10/29/2015) [-]
Ah, I guess much like the video, you haven't been reading any other comment either. Okay. This will be my last reply, so you can take that as a win. Have a good day, now.
Reply
+10
#90 to #39 - halarious (10/29/2015) [-]
If you get warned repeatedly to the point the police has to be called, and then you assault the police officer while refusing then yeah, you gonna get flung around. And forced out of your desk.
Reply
+18
#34 - poopmanz (10/29/2015) [-]
I'm clearly watching a different video then.
Reply
-3
#74 to #34 - JustintheWaysian ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
Cop Assaults Student at Spring Valley High School
Here you go. You can see her punching his face about 3 times before the desk starts to tip.
Reply
0
User avatar #755 to #74 - youregaylol (11/03/2015) [-]
poopmanz, the truth hurts huh?
Reply
0
#756 to #755 - poopmanz (11/03/2015) [-]
That video is cut and the same one i watched where it looks like she's getting thrown for no reason. So no.
Reply
0
User avatar #757 to #756 - youregaylol (11/03/2015) [-]
Cut? wtf are you talking about?

It clearly shows her punching him.

I'll just chalk this up to leftist denial then.
Reply
0
#759 to #757 - poopmanz (11/03/2015) [-]
Alright
Reply
+3
User avatar #37 to #34 - icedmantwo (10/29/2015) [-]
If you watch the video where it looks like the cops just walks up and flips her, then watch for the video skip just before that.
Reply
+43
User avatar #214 - kijajouteh (10/29/2015) [-]
>Girl is being disruptive in class

"Let's call a ******* police officer!"

The guy even had a history of being too rough with students. He ******* ripped the girl from her chair and threw her, hell yeah that's police brutality! Just because your opinion is unpopular doesn't mean it's right. Some force was necessary, sure, but that **** is wayyyy over the line.
Reply
0
User avatar #671 to #214 - YoursTruley (10/30/2015) [-]
Actually no he never had a complaint at the school. The two complaints were from him on the road.
Reply
0
User avatar #672 to #214 - markipliergame (10/30/2015) [-]
resource officer. school staff, not police.
Reply
-3
User avatar #288 to #214 - leonhardt (10/29/2015) [-]
You've never been in class trying to learn when some ******** black cunt won't shut the **** up
Reply
+2
User avatar #290 to #288 - kijajouteh (10/29/2015) [-]
I have, but if a police officer came in and threw the ****** across the room I'd notice that it's clearly police brutality.
Reply
+2
User avatar #496 to #290 - iexs (10/29/2015) [-]
He kept her from hitting hard by grabbing her desk, then slid her across the floor.
Reply
-5
User avatar #322 to #290 - theattackmaster (10/29/2015) [-]
It depends on how much force was needed to overcome hers, and also on how much force he actually used. She flipped herself over by kicking, that was her fault. The only question on my mind is whether or not he meant to throw her like that, for all I know, he could of over estimated the amount of power required to move her from her seat.
Reply
+4
User avatar #367 to #322 - kijajouteh (10/29/2015) [-]
Or you know

he could've

not tried to throw her.

Do some research, kids called him officer slam because he's done this **** before, dude got what he deserved. I hate trying to make 8 year olds go to bed, but I don't throw them.
Reply
+2
User avatar #428 to #367 - youregaylol (10/29/2015) [-]
Where is the evidence that he was called "officer slam" before this incident, besides just hearsay. Seems extremely convenient that in the height of this televised case about slamming that one of the kids has come forward and said that his nickname is "officer slam". Now it might just be me, but I'm thinking he was called that after it happened, but thats just a guess, I don't put too much stock in the students of this school.

One of them said the officer called him the n word while the officer has been in a long term relationship with a black woman. Just a hunch but I don't think someone who has been publically dating a black woman would casually use the term the n word.

All seems a bit like a witch hunt, except abigal williams is a loudmouth looking for 5 minutes of fame.

Reply
-2
User avatar #369 to #367 - theattackmaster (10/29/2015) [-]
So how do you arrest someone currently sitting in a chair who is resisting arrest. I would remove them from the chair, if that means having to thrown them out of it, so be it, they're resisting arrest at this point.
Reply
0
User avatar #391 to #369 - kijajouteh (10/29/2015) [-]
They're a minor

If you threw them out of the chair you're an asshole, and you're breaking the law you're supposed to uphold

I'm done with this, you're clearly just following the FJ hive-mind at this point, logic can't reach you when you have other like-minded idiots around you.
Reply
0
#394 to #391 - theattackmaster (10/29/2015) [-]
Doesn't matter. A police officer is required, by law, to use only the force necessary to overcome the force the opponent is using. He did exactly that. If anything, this man deserves a medal, not a punishment for doing his job.
Reply
+1
User avatar #491 to #214 - iexs (10/29/2015) [-]
I've said this to many times, it was a school cop, he was there the whole time, they didn't dial 911, they went out into the hall and asked him to step in real quick. While agree it looked pretty rough, the worst she'll have is a bruise.
Reply
-3
User avatar #494 to #491 - kijajouteh (10/29/2015) [-]
The police officer disrupted the class more than she ever did. I know it was a school cop, that doesn't really change anything, guy is an ass, needs to chill.
Reply
+3
User avatar #498 to #494 - iexs (10/29/2015) [-]
He came in, and got her out, and the class resumed, it would have been a lot more disruptive to let her stay there and **** around.
Reply
-3
User avatar #501 to #498 - kijajouteh (10/29/2015) [-]
Right because the class is going to resume normally

after a kid was thrown across the room

Have you been in a high school
Reply
+1
User avatar #549 to #501 - WhereMehSammich (10/29/2015) [-]
Class does resume about less than a minute after they leave. I've been in a class where kids get in a fight and they just leave. **** I've taken a punch(it was weak, didn't even leave a bruise. Chose not to get into a full on fight. been there done that. Win or lose, there would've been a 2nd asswhooping at my house. No thanks. ) during class and after the kid left there was small chatter from most of the class and then the teacher says something along the lines of "ok it's over now, lets continue" then after the class settles down, they continue teaching.
Reply
0
User avatar #507 to #501 - iexs (10/29/2015) [-]
What do you think would have happened if she stayed...?
Reply
0
User avatar #520 to #501 - kafei (10/29/2015) [-]
Chances are that this wasn't the first time she'd been a little bitchburger like that, but yes. I've been in classes where that sort of **** happened and they did go back to "normal" (read: better than with the disruptive person in there) a few moments after the person was gone.

Have you been in a situation like this where the outcome was different? If so, chances are you had a terrible teacher.
Reply
+6
#613 - Darkly (10/30/2015) [-]
Jesus, what is wrong with you people. I have been coming to this site since it was green, and every week there is more and more intolerance and racism. Sure, it's wrong to resist an officer but she CLEARLY did not strike him, he grabbed her left arm and she tried to force it away from him and out of his grasp, he put her in a chokehold and tried to pull her out of the chair, but just ended up pushing backwards and she started flailing because her desk was being flipped, which is a natural response to falling/being forced backwards onto the ground. She fell onto her side, still tangled in the desk, and he pulled her out and then threw her across the classroom too quickly for her to even be able to orient herself and resist. He used excessive force. She is a teenager, he is a cop who is supposed to show restraint beyond what the normal person does and he absolutely did not do that here.
Reply
+2
User avatar #616 to #613 - bme (10/30/2015) [-]
Ive been saying all along.
She resisted arrest and he used excessive force both are at fault but he should loose his job and she should be suspended from school.
Reply
+3
#618 to #616 - Darkly (10/30/2015) [-]
Yeah, I'm talking about the assholes who are saying she was hitting him and absolutely deserved what happened and then are bringing her race into the equation, which shouldn't matter at all. A lot of people saw and know what really happened. I shouldn't paint such broad strokes by saying you people. But it is just ridiculous to me that people actually believe she was trying to hit a towering police officer while sitting down after he had already grabbed her arm. If she was attempting to strike him she would have used her other arm which was totally free.
Reply
+17
#343 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
Did anyone here actually watch the video? She never laid a single finger on the officer. She sat there quietly and refused to respond to the verbal abuse she was receiving from the officer. Maybe she was a **** student, maybe she was a nice girl and the teacher had some beef. Who knows? Doesn't change the fact that an officer working at a high-school shouldn't behave like a goddamn thug.
Reply
0
#579 to #343 - petresko (10/30/2015) [-]
Or maybe she was acting like a bitch and got what was coming to her,but we wouldn't know because people don't record the full thing and it hits them to start recording just before **** gets serious ...
Reply
-1
User avatar #345 to #343 - cmilanes (10/29/2015) [-]
**** . Posted as anon.
Reply
+21
#83 - infurnus (10/29/2015) [-]
Heh, I tweeted about this because it annoyed me. I got a few favourites which later were removed due to people calling them racists etc. It boiled my piss when I saw this.
Reply
+5
User avatar #669 - fuccthedevil (10/30/2015) [-]
I mean I've seen the video and the girl didn't punch, or kick the officer.
Don't know what happened before the video, but he pretty much suplexed her as soon as he approached the desk in the video.
Reply
+5
User avatar #445 - peezle (10/29/2015) [-]
Real victims of police brutality don't get that many chances.
Reply
+5
#371 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
Reply
0
#442 to #371 - zenthos (10/29/2015) [-]
this
this
Reply
+4
#659 - anon (10/30/2015) [-]
Another racist FJ circle jerk! Eat **** guys, having to watch this political mob take over the front page every day is getting pretty old. What happened to the "funny"?
Reply
+4
#592 - schrutebucks (10/30/2015) [-]
I remember when coming to this site was an escape from all this divisive ******** .
Reply
+4
User avatar #586 - rogaa (10/30/2015) [-]
I completely agree with every other cop in the other main stories of "police brutality" but this one isn't right. I just watched it again. The cop slams her on the ground and puts her in a head lock. no this is ****** up no wonder he got ******* fired. just stop defending at this point FJ.
Reply
+4
#553 - casualtyivvii (10/30/2015) [-]
Looking at the comments I can't tell if FJ loves cops or hates black people.
Reply
+4
#84 - toothface (10/29/2015) [-]
Being forcefully removed when refusing to obey a completely valid order is fine. But this cop treated her like just another criminal, which she is not. What the **** was she gonna do to the cop? Scream? Oh yeah... That is dangerous **** right there, better use overwhelming force from the get-go.
Reply
-3
User avatar #89 to #84 - nudybooty (10/29/2015) [-]
Please tell me what he was suppose to do if she would no move when asked.
Reply
+3
#92 to #89 - toothface (10/29/2015) [-]
Pretty simple really. How about not slamming her to the ground? Move a bit more slowly, take her things away, give her an incentive to move away herself. The only thing the teacher and officer did was telling her to move away. Did they tell her about the consequences? No. Even if she knew, young teenagers, which are kids, are ******* morons and extremely stubborn, and adults are supposed to know this and act accordingly.
If I was the cop I would have told her the consequences of not moving, that I would pick her up and carry her outside if I had to, and if she still refused at the end, give her a reward; tell her that she could leave the school for the day, go home. After a confrontation like that, that reward seems pretty ******* good to me.

The only problem I see is how to properly remove a person from those retarded desks if she still refused.

TLDR: There exist no acceptable excuse for an officer to bodyslam a passive child like that.
Reply
-3
User avatar #94 to #92 - nudybooty (10/29/2015) [-]
Not reading what you wrote after the second sentence because you clearly didn't read the post.

She flipped her own desk. He didn't slam her into the ground.
Reply
+4
#96 to #94 - toothface (10/29/2015) [-]
Apparently you have not watched the video. The officer is the one flipping the desk, and then proceeding to throw her on the ground once off the desk.
A Police Officer Violently Throws A Female Student Around The Classroom
Reply
-3
User avatar #113 to #96 - lucariopwnz (10/29/2015) [-]
The only reason the desk flipped is because it was attached to the chair. He was trying to pick her up out of the seat and she held on to the desk with her legs which over balanced it which was when the cop let go. To be fair he should have just kneaded his fingers into her hair and removed her more slowly through pain compliance. But in my personal opinion, any little bitch who is that disrespectufl not only to a teacher but to a police officer deserves that and then some. Kids in todays society are completely ****** and pain compliance is somthing that needs to be enforced more
Reply
+2
User avatar #172 to #113 - theism ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
I think the big issue is the fact that he dragged the desk and threw her out of it after it flipped. That's not necessary at all.
Reply
0
#546 to #172 - anon (10/29/2015) [-]
how else is he supposed to get her out of the desk? by asking her nicely despite the fact that she already refused all the officers and teachers requests several times? if someone is resisting then everything you do will look much worse than it actually is.
Reply
0
User avatar #547 to #546 - theism ONLINE (10/29/2015) [-]
At that point she has to get out to get up anyway. Unless she plans to just sit there, in that case it's slightly more justified.
Reply
+12
User avatar #114 - malhaloc (10/29/2015) [-]
>See this story on the news
>Notice in the first second that the cop was white and the student was black
>First words out of my mouth "Here we go"
>Watch as everyone flips **** over "racist" cop "abusing" a dindu
Reply
+3
User avatar #666 - frizzyo (10/30/2015) [-]
But where are the sources for this? Can't just believe a random poster as much as most believe a news network. I just need to see how this is true. It hurts to say I need that now, as it sucks that how ease of access of the internet has caused that.
Reply
+1
User avatar #673 to #666 - robinwilliamson (10/30/2015) [-]
Unless his asshole where he pulled it from has a website, fat chance.
12345>>>
[ 760 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)