Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(61):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 61 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
35 comments displayed.
#19 - deviousmurloc (11/19/2014) [-]
Too bad I have to use third party hardware to get the resolution up to normal...
User avatar #27 to #19 - fuckingtrolls (11/20/2014) [-]
wat
User avatar #28 to #27 - xxangelisxx (11/20/2014) [-]
Glasses & lenses.
User avatar #17 - avyon (11/19/2014) [-]
there is playstation, xbox, and wii
with consoles everyone can see
but we can look outside
at the world so wide
with graphics almost as good as PC
User avatar #57 to #17 - thefleetadmiral (11/20/2014) [-]
> almost
#20 to #17 - thedecodedgamer (11/19/2014) [-]
That was beautiful
#41 - wolfenbanes (11/20/2014) [-]
TFW you're near sighted and it's still in super ****** res.
#31 - alienwax (11/20/2014) [-]
A buddy of mine did this with his TV. I think it turned out pretty good.
User avatar #25 - leonhardt (11/20/2014) [-]
Glare's pretty **** , though
#1 - unfitninjuh ONLINE (11/19/2014) [-]
Based on the dimensions of the door.
Based on the dimensions of the door.
#22 - politetroll (11/19/2014) [-]
Actually, the resolution we percieve in the the world to be in would be about equivalent to a 576 megapixel camera, because our eyes can't see any detail beyond that, and the highest resolution camera in the world is 1.8 gigapixels.

Thumb me down please.
#30 to #22 - anon (11/20/2014) [-]
If you limit cameras to what the eye perceives, then a 1.8 gigapixel camera might as well be 576 megapixels. In that case, it's not so much our vision as the information itself. I would guess that Mother Nature's optical wavelengths trump our super-high density camera. You got a point though. Just depends on how you look at it.
User avatar #46 to #22 - penileburglar (11/20/2014) [-]
If we're going to define resolution by the capabilities of our eyes, then you can't really say a camera has a higher resolution, either.
#47 to #46 - politetroll (11/20/2014) [-]
Until you zoom something in
User avatar #48 to #47 - penileburglar (11/20/2014) [-]
...You can do that in real-life too, bro.

It's called 'walk closer.'

Or use binoculars / a telescope.
#49 to #48 - politetroll (11/20/2014) [-]
Magnifying something and zooming in aren't the same thing at all, and I'm pretty sure anyone could realize how irrelevant the walking closer thing is.
User avatar #51 to #49 - penileburglar (11/20/2014) [-]
If your lense is good enough, the effect of zooming in after the fact and magnifying before the fact is the same.

And the point of zooming in is to be able to see something closer. You accomplish that in the real world by getting closer to the object. Since your only defense is to state 'nope, that's wrong, anyone could see that' then there's nothing more I need to say to you, have a good one.
#52 to #51 - politetroll (11/20/2014) [-]
Okay, first I'll tackle the walking closer bit. If you honestly can't see the benefits of being able to zoom something in rather than walk closer, you seriously need to think about whether you should argue with anyone ever. It's easier for one thing, it makes it possible to take pictures of things that you can't walk to, not to mention it makes satelite imagery possible.

As for the magnifying thing, you're right, magnifying works for taking the photo, but after the fact if you're limited by your resolution, you won't be able to make out finer details. I think most people, myself included, have seen a picture and tried to make out small distant objects, and then not been able to because of the resolution.

The fact is, there are cameras with higher resolution than the human eye. If you don't believe me try flying up to space and taking a picture through your binoculars, and then compare it to a satelite image of the same thing.
User avatar #59 to #52 - penileburglar (11/20/2014) [-]
I stopped reading after the first line.

When you learn how to argue properly, I'll entertain you. When you can't make it a sentence without resorting to insults, you're not worth my time. Bye now.
#61 to #59 - politetroll (11/20/2014) [-]
Classic attempt to duck out of an argument that you've clearly lost
#43 - konradkurze (11/20/2014) [-]
**konradkurze rolled image**
whats outside my house...and is why i stay inside
#23 - anonasuser (11/19/2014) [-]
in*
#9 - graboidzero (11/19/2014) [-]
**graboidzero rolled image** and this is what he's gonna take pictures of
User avatar #26 - maxreuben (11/20/2014) [-]
It has a ****** ass zoom though.
User avatar #6 - yunnie (11/19/2014) [-]
and the worst when you see your crush kissing some asshole
#7 to #6 - Sperit (11/19/2014) [-]
excuse me sir but you sucked up
#42 - gayfurryalliance (11/20/2014) [-]
A gay furry kiss? A gay furry kiss.

A nice little lick on those gay furry lips.

Gay furries are loved by all and they are sure.

That asshole taste great when it's by the shore.
#32 - reybango (11/20/2014) [-]
How's it going? I'm Rey Bango, Ray Bingo's distant cousin.
User avatar #58 - flushfactor (11/20/2014) [-]
we have made cameras better than the eye...
User avatar #56 - brucieblue (11/20/2014) [-]
My first thought was that was artwork of a 3ds.. lol
User avatar #54 - scorcho (11/20/2014) [-]
i don't know man, those 4k tvs basically look better than real life
User avatar #53 - Nekatroz (11/20/2014) [-]
****** zoom.
0
#14 - jewishcommunazi has deleted their comment [-]
[ 61 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)