The Simpsons go to Chernobyl. . A mural portraying the Simpsons and that nuclear energy is safe. Chernobyl, Ukraine.. Yeah that's shopped.
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

The Simpsons go to Chernobyl

+525
Views: 29270
Favorited: 31
Submitted: 10/31/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to OVendettaO E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(72):

[ 72 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#6 - numaniod (10/31/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Yeah that's shopped.
User avatar #2 - udei (10/31/2013) [+] (6 replies)
not to mention that chernobyl blew up in 1986 and the first episode of simpsons ( at least according to wikipedia) is in 1989. so ye its fake, op is fag.. uneducated one
#1 - mudkipfucker ONLINE (10/31/2013) [-]
It looks like this thing advertising the 350th Episode Future-Drama that came out in 2005
User avatar #10 - allamericandude (10/31/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Nuclear energy IS safe. The Soviets who built the nuclear plant at Chernobyl WEREN'T.
#20 - granodd (11/01/2013) [+] (4 replies)
>MFW you expect me to believe that the Soviets would even think of using Western media. Also the fact that Simpsons didn't even exist.
#13 - zombiefied (10/31/2013) [-]
It's actually a giant poster, not a painting.

#14 - chris chris (10/31/2013) [+] (3 replies)
considering the green toxic smoke coming from the stacks it is obviously not trying to portray the safety of nuclear energy... glavin
#65 - jabadagriffins (11/01/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Well nuclear energy is safe...   
   
It is dangerous when it is in an under developed country that is running the reactor at double capacity.   
   
People screaming nuclear energy is dangerous are actually making it more dangerous by not allowing newer more modern and safer reactors to be built, at the moment all reactors are between 20-30 year old technology.    
   
Storing it is also safely done, so is transporting nuclear waste.    
Fun fact if you think living near one is dangerous.   
   
A banana contains more radiation than you would receive in a life time of living within 50km of a nuclear power plant.
Well nuclear energy is safe...

It is dangerous when it is in an under developed country that is running the reactor at double capacity.

People screaming nuclear energy is dangerous are actually making it more dangerous by not allowing newer more modern and safer reactors to be built, at the moment all reactors are between 20-30 year old technology.

Storing it is also safely done, so is transporting nuclear waste.
Fun fact if you think living near one is dangerous.

A banana contains more radiation than you would receive in a life time of living within 50km of a nuclear power plant.
User avatar #61 - thebestpieever (11/01/2013) [-]
So uh, just for the record, the first season of The SImpsons went on the air a full 3 years after the Chernobyl disaster. Let alone the crisp, lean looking mid-nineties version of The Simpsons portrayed here.
#48 - fyaq (11/01/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Shopped, nuclear energy is safe when regulated, and a repost.

If you didnt suck enough dicks yesterday, you'll sure as hell reach your quota today.
#16 - ultimatebadass (11/01/2013) [+] (2 replies)
The Simpsons wasn't even out yet when Chernobyl blew up, not to mention that well animated
The Simpsons wasn't even out yet when Chernobyl blew up, not to mention that well animated
User avatar #63 - hellomynameisbill ONLINE (11/01/2013) [-]
why is green gas oming out of the cooling tower? cooling towers water cool and the gas should therefore be water vapour
#35 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/01/2013) [+] (5 replies)
NUCLEAR ENGINEER MASTER RACE REPORTING TO EXPLAIN CHERNOBYL AND WHY IT FAILED: Okay, first of all, the reactor itself was a breeder reactor: Meaning you put in uranium, and get plutonium out. The soviets rushed the production of the plant for nuclear weapons, and the reactor itself HAD NO CONTAINMENT. THAT'S LIKE MAKING SUBMARINE WALLS OUT OF THIN GLASS AND BEING LIKE **** I HOPE WE DON'T BUMP SOMETHING. Next, the actual explosion was man-caused. The scientists were doing an experiment, and virtually this is how it went. They removed a **** ton of control rods, but the reactivity (what causes **** to heat up) wasn't changing. This was due to something called Xenon poisoning, meaning that because of the decay cycle, xenon was building up and the reactivity was going down. After 12 hours, xenon decays and reactivity goes up. They didn't know that, and they waited until it was too late to scram. BOOM. no containment, and the graphite coolant caught fire and exploded. THE END.
User avatar #34 - theguyishere (11/01/2013) [-]
Nuclear Energy is safe. Chernobyl happened because of typical Soviet ideals of safety last. Trust me I know about the precautions in the nuclear industry. I worked for a company that builds nuclear reactors last summer.
User avatar #39 - GEARBOY (11/01/2013) [+] (4 replies)
I doubt a communist country would be allowed to use that during the cold war...
User avatar #36 - coolcalx (11/01/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Nuclear energy IS safe.

however, it's not all that efficient, in terms of net energy output.
also it creates nuclear waste, but that's okay, because we use the nuclear waste for our nuclear arsenal.

that's right. nuclear fission energy is relatively inefficient, yet we still use it, conceivably because we can use the byproducts to create weapons. that's why we didn't want Iran building a nuclear plant. nuclear plants are basically low key bomb-making factories
#51 to #36 - xxxsonic fanxxx (11/01/2013) [-]
Nuclear reactors have a 97% efficiency. Wind mills are 31%. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING MASTER RACE REPORTING.
User avatar #28 - dafukdude (11/01/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Isn't that the kind of poster thingy for the latest season?
User avatar #32 to #28 - calawesome (11/01/2013) [-]
it's promotion from the simpsons movie.I had one on my wall.
User avatar #37 - Mikeekidd (11/01/2013) [+] (1 reply)
am I going to be the one to say that Chernobyl is still habitable by humans and that humans still work relatively close to the reactor and that they even smoke near it? for limited periods of coarse, but I've been there and it was extremely fascinating that people still work there, anyway my point is that could have been painted extremely easily.
[ 72 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)