The Right Choice

Adjust content blocking

mrsgooser

next random

Comment

BEAMS. .
TIE EEO " III’ HIE El
an mum

...

+1899

Views: 66193 Submitted: 11/29/2013

Hide Comments

Add Comment Refresh (493)

First 2 3 4 5 Last Next

[ 493 comments ]

Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest

Live Updates: On

Options

asd

#7 - anon id: b68c9f51

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I hate it when people justify things like theft.

#117 to #7 - highfocus

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

natural right over anything

well in this sort of case!

#222 to #7 - gerno

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

i hate it when people refuse to log in and take the red thumbs like a man

#285 to #7 - mattyjay

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

i hate it when people are complete and utter cunts

#49 to #7 - runescapewasgood

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

That's an interesting moral question - I suppose that it could be viewed that stealing far outweighs, but this individual most likely values life over petty theft

#92 to #7 - anon id: aac01ef8

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

HAH u got owned ************ anon dickhead

#134 to #7 - drjake

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

#167 to #7 - anon id: 3d0bf27c

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

i hate it when people justify abuse

#354 to #7 - anon id: e366b0f4

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

400 THUMBS DOWN?
does that mean anons get new a cloured text?!!?!

#208 to #7 - SunilCCXXXVII **User deleted account**

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

If I could download a dog, I would.

#122 to #7 - crackabottle

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I hate it when people overlook context.

#166 to #7 - greedtheavaricious

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Go **** yourself with a rusty rake, asshole.

#391 to #166 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I hope someone takes all your belongings because they take it upon their judgement to decide what you do and don't deserve

#397 to #391 - greedtheavaricious

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I wouldn't care in the slightest if it was a lifeless object, but we're talking about a living being here.

#399 to #397 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

okay, then let them take away your pets because they think you don't deserve it. See how arbitrary your opinion is, even if it is right?

#405 to #399 - greedtheavaricious

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Dude, the dog was being abused and mistreated. I love my dog to no ends and treat him very well, even though I'm impatient with him at times. He's still being fed, walked and receives the love he deserves for being man's best friend.

There is a major difference here. You don't just "Own" a dog, you live with him. Kind alike a disabled roommate you have to take care of - admittely not the best comparison, but you get the idea.

#412 to #405 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I don't get the idea, no. Doesn't matter how you raise your dog someone else is going to think you don't deserve to have them as a pet, maybe their dog has their own mansion estate and they believe that's what every dog deserves. Why are you abusing your dog, then? Like I said, your opinion is entirely arbitrary and you can't infringe on someone's rights just because you think it's right.

#415 to #412 - greedtheavaricious

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I gotta admit, you do have a point and can't really counter it. When it comes to laws it still is considered theft, no matter if others think it is right to take the dog away or not.

While I disagree with it it still is the law, can we agree on that one?

#467 to #415 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

The law doesn't get enforced by you, though. My only issue is that they acted based on their own judgement, completely ignoring the legal process to deal with animal abuse

#38 to #7 - bronybox

Reply +10 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Theft is simply taking something that isn't yours.
There's actually nothing wrong with it from an objective point of view, and it honestly only exists as a major issue because humanity decided to establish an economic system, so idk.

#146 to #38 - goldenfairy

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Dog ran away which is equivalent of losing something. Found items belong to whoever found it, so I think this is fine.

#468 to #146 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

The dog didn't run away, it was stolen.

#272 to #146 - zalvorn

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Finders keepers, losers weepers?

#229 to #38 - chudy

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Well to put things in perspective concept of economy is based on exchanging goods, whether it's money or livestock or just various items. Not everyone is versed in all trades, as such in a spirit of team effort we "decided" to establish an economic system for our species to thrive. Certain items fulfil certain functions and they are there for a reason. By stealing you put other people at loss, or at risk - so basically by doing so you're being a huge dick serving only your needs. Even in most tribal societies i don't think stealing is seen as a good thing.

#18 to #7 - whiteblob

Reply +27 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

If it was something material, there is no justification, but seeing as this object feels and could love. I think it's fne.

#13 to #7 - mykoira

Reply +696 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

i hate when people overlook things like animal abuse.

#339 to #13 - meebobear

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

there you go.. 600 thumbs now

#351 to #13 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

What gives you the right to decide what is and what isn't animal abuse? What if your pet was taken from you now because someone decided by their judgement that you were an unfit pet owner?

#369 to #351 - rabidaardvark

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I'm pretty sure theirs no way you can justify beatings and starvation as not animal abuse.

#390 to #369 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

except I never said it wasn't, it's very wrong and it is animal abuse but that doesn't justify theft

#435 to #390 - kweel

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Doesn't justify it. Its still a crime, but this crime commited is better than the crime that was already going on. So it was the right thing to do

#464 to #435 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

No it's not because he acted based on his own judgement. Imagine if your dog got stolen because someone didn't think you were a bad owner

#472 to #464 - kweel

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

Given the story told it was the right thing to do. But in other cases which werent this extreme it would be a bad thing to do

#396 to #390 - anon id: a02efd76

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

It was wrong for the allies to rescue people from death camps because torture doesn't justify theft. The underground railroad shouldn't have saved slaves because slavery doesn't justify theft.

Let's all let animals be beaten and tortured because theft is bad kiddies!

#407 to #396 - lamarisagoodname

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Think of it the other way, what if someone took your belongings, pets or even children away from you because they didn't think you deserved them? Your personal opinion is arbitrary in this situation, and taking away someone's pet doesn't relate to POWs or slaves freeing themselves. Abe Lincoln freed the slaves by legislative process and the muslims freed the slaves by buying their freedom, being a vigilante and changing the world as you see fit is very hypocritical.

#495 to #407 - anon id: 3bdeb346

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/04/2013) [-]

if you beat and starve your kids, they get taken away, dont be a dumbass

#497 to #495 - lamarisagoodname

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/05/2013) [-]

Except they weren't taken away, the authorities left the situation well enough alone.

#454 to #407 - rabidaardvark

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

So you're telling us that if you were in the guy's shoes you would have given the dog back to those people? would you be more sympathetic if it was a child instead of a dog? We have laws and such against theft because otherwise society could not function, but that doesnt make the world full of black and white, right and wrong. Its all shades of grey; theft is wrong but in this case it got that animal out of a terrible situation and hopefully into better one. Is it wrong for a man to steal bread to feed his family because he cant afford it?

#460 to #454 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

What if the bread said man stole to feed his family was there to feed another family? What if your child was taken away from you because some random character (not the law) decided you were unfit to keep your child?

#479 to #460 - rabidaardvark

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

you seem to be dodging he question of what you would do in those situations. If it was my child or dog I wouldnt be beating and starving them in the first place, but if I was that person would have every right to take them away from me, even If I didnt see it that way at the time.

#481 to #479 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

No, you wouldn't have the right to take his dog away from him and you should give the dog back. You're trying to justify theft based on what you think is right rather than letting the authority deal with it. If you're implying that they should abide by the animal rights laws but you're completely free to disregard laws against theft you're being a very big hypocrite

#482 to #481 - rabidaardvark

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

If I see an animal or child being beaten and starved, I am going to get involved. If that means taking it away illegally then so be it. To hell with 'laws', if they mean its right for people to do this to other living things then they are wrong. If i get arrested fine, but my concience will be clean, and I will know i have done the right thing.

#484 to #482 - lamarisagoodname

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

The ideology of "to hell with laws" is what began this issue in the first place, are you saying we dissolve all laws and just start cleaning the streets up with theft, violence and self-proclaimed justice? I get it, it's a horrible situation and you have every single obligation to pursue your legal options to stopping it, but don't think you're "right" if you infringe on their rights to solve the issue. If it clears your conscience then so be it but no real justice was done here.

#486 to #484 - rabidaardvark

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

we could start a whole other debate on whether legal justice always equals 'real' justice

#489 to #486 - lamarisagoodname

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

It's always going to be arbitrary, so that's why we decided on a set of laws and referenced "justice" based off that. Under said law, there is a balance between what you think is right and what others think is right, and if you start going past the line then you're being very detrimental to "justice"

rome wasn't built in a day, you have to live and work with imbalance for some time before you can finally fix it.

#490 to #489 - rabidaardvark

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

We've never decided on a set of laws though. thats why laws have changed over and over and over again throughout history, and why laws are different throughout the world. I'm not saying they're all pointless and to just throw them out the window, but sometimes doing something which is 'against the law' is the right thing. Murder is against the law, but does that make someone who kills a home invader in self defence wrong? Or a soldier killing an enemy wrong?

#491 to #490 - lamarisagoodname

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/02/2013) [-]

Except self defense is legal, and a soldier killing an enemy is unrelated in this case. I understand the point you're coming from and I'm a big believer in the meta-truth behind laws and crime etc but going vigilante based on your OWN accord isn't the right thing to do.

Also, if you kill a home invader that is wrong, if he pulls a knife on you and attempts to hurt you, you can shoot him but if you outright murder him after you've incapacitated him, you've gone too far. I'd be a bit more lax in this situation, however because if there's a stranger inside your house your primary concern is the safety of your family, not their's.

My focus is specifically on this case where a dog was taken from his home, and the fact that the decision to decide whether or not the dog should have been taken away wasn't (soley) their's to decide. In my opinion, the dog should have been taken away as per the RCSPA laws (or however it goes, I don't live in the states) but I wouldn't ever go as far as to steal the dog based solely on my judgement.

#492 to #491 - rabidaardvark

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/02/2013) [-]

So you're saying there can be mitigating circumstances for killing, but not for theft?

In this case the guy tried going through the legal system, and when they either would not or could not do anything he had to take it into his own hands. In this case I will not be convinced he did not do the right thing.

#453 to #407 - uhidk

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

you are an idiot.

#466 to #453 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

Nice rebuttal there, incredibly mature. No really, you've shown me the error of my ways in a very well constructed counter-argument

#483 to #466 - rabidaardvark

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

well apparently trying to engage you in well reasoned argument is a futile effort since you have such a narrow view of things you need to move your head from side to side just to look at you phone's entire screen.

#485 to #483 - lamarisagoodname

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

That's a bit hypocritical, considering I've been listening to and arguing against all points given to me yet you've just dismissed my entire argument as "narrow minded" and then proceeded to insult

#487 to #485 - rabidaardvark

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

you've been making the exact same points over and over again; that being that there is only absolute right and absolute wrong, that there is no justification for theft at all, even if it puts an end to torture.

#469 to #466 - uhidk

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

not trying to argue. just stating facts.

#470 to #469 - lamarisagoodname

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

What are these facts based on? I'm actually quite curious to see what spawns such wanton ignorance

#452 to #407 - guanyu

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

You're basically saying that theft is wrong in and of itself and abuse isn't, kind of messed up.

#461 to #452 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

I never said it abuse was right, I said it was wrong to steal a man's dog based on your own judgement. Report it to the law and leave it at that. Imagine if everyone decided it was okay to act against the law because of their own judgement and your dog got stolen just because someone thought you were an unfit owner

#432 to #407 - anon id: a02efd76

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

So if you saw a man being stabbed in the street you would just walk by and not stop the man? Or if you saw some people assaulting a dog would you just go by? It's the people like you that are too scared and lazy to save a living being that make me sick.

#433 to #432 - anon id: a02efd76

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

An by the way I do accept that it was wrong to simply keep the dog because a friend wanted one; he should've taken it to a rescue centre but at least he did something.

#465 to #432 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

You can legally step into an assault situation but that's not the same as taking someone's dog away. I say again, imagine if someone went into your home and stole something of your's because they didn't think you deserved it, living or not.

You're perfectly right to say that animal abuse is a terrible thing but you can't justify stealing someone's pet just because YOU think it's the right thing to do.

#197 to #13 - amsel

Reply -6 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I agree with you, but I also wouldn't thumb this guy down. Who draws the line and where for this? It's like people who say "if you don't give your child flu shots, it's abuse and they should be taken by child services!" Or "you need meat to survive, if you're raising your kid as a vegetarian, it's a crime!" If you took some vegan, hippy's kid and gave it to your friend, you'd probably both be arrested for kidnapping, and your justification would make you sound crazy. This could be a case where the guy is like "Electric fences = beating" and "they only fed him DRY DOG FOOD! He's STARVING! He needs steak with dinner" and "breeding dogs is for horrible people!" and "dogs need twelve thousand dollars worth of vaccinations every year!" while really the owners are treating the dog relatively well. That's why things like the RSPCA exist, and this guy clearly determined he was above their authority.

TL;DR: snap judgements are bad, m'kay?

#254 to #197 - mahnamesjakers

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Not sure what all the thumbs down are for but I agree that really there is no way to know how far the exaggeration went.

#463 to #197 - lamarisagoodname

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

Stick through the red thumbs, you're in the right here. Imagine if everyone decided to be a vigilante

#237 to #197 - helpthepeople

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Now you are making snap judgements, what is starving was not giving the dog proper nutrition and enough food? or beating was physically abusing the dog? I am not saying this is definitive, but if he went so far as giving another persons dog away, I am sure the dog was mistreated

#251 to #237 - amsel

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

The RSCPA didn't do anything about it, meaning they didn't think abuse was occurring. He then went vigilante and stole a family's dog. I don't exactly think that's good practice.

#462 to #237 - lamarisagoodname

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

The point is not whether or not animal abuse is okay, but it's wrong to act based on your own personal judgement

#496 to #462 - redpapyrus

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/05/2013) [-]

Why is it that someone always seems to get their cock in a fiddle? Lord.

#477 to #462 - helpthepeople

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

LOL I'm not even going to begin explaining to you how utterly retarded that statement is

#480 to #477 - lamarisagoodname

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(12/01/2013) [-]

Of course you aren't, because it makes perfect sense, you're just too far up your own ass to understand it

Go ahead, be a vigilante and start taking people's pets away because YOU think they shouldn't be allowed to have them, lets see how much you improve the situation

#235 to #197 - helpthepeople

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#199 to #197 - mykoira

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

and that is why i didn't thumb him down. i agree with him, it's illegal no matter how good reasons you have. but there is what is legal, and what is morally right thing to do.

#202 to #13 - sirzeel

Reply -12 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I hate when people fall for obvious trolls.

#1 - reapermaster

+462 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#392 to #1 - turdofdoom

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

i also did a good job
www.funnyjunk.com/good+news+everyone/funny-pictures/4908882
look

#394 to #392 - reapermaster

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#398 to #394 - turdofdoom

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

yes

#401 to #398 - reapermaster

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#404 to #401 - turdofdoom

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

i am prepared

#409 to #404 - reapermaster

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#420 to #409 - turdofdoom

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

O: robot

#421 to #420 - reapermaster

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#422 to #421 - turdofdoom

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

i dont really wach so much aneyme and mangos
but i have seen dbz and some others

#423 to #422 - reapermaster

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#196 to #1 - maxsexington

Reply +9 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Even Hitler agrees and he was a notoriously rude man

#212 to #196 - kaitora

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Who said he was?

#228 to #212 - maxsexington

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

He'd steal the poo out of your arse given the chance

#5 - fightforfate

Reply +224 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

you are a good person

#9 - siriuslygrim

Reply +186 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I approve of the choice, but the fact that it took months concerns me.

#265 to #9 - ssjmizu

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

He can't steal it, the dog escaped on her own, he found her and gave her away I'm guessing.

#14 - jingleforth

Reply +130 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

tfw want a husky so badly but am allergic to them.

#180 to #14 - blacktitan

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I don't want to like your comment because I feel pain for you, and I don't want to like your problems....

#211 to #14 - EdwardNigma

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Tfw wanted a husky since I was a kid but the relentless Australian sun would kill it and I want a long haired one.

#258 to #14 - banthar

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Hey that's okay man, I have two big doggies and I'm allergic to both of them, if I just take daily 24 hour allergy meds they don't bother me that much. Well worth it in my opinion

#276 to #14 - magtheicelander

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

that red text is one the most irritating thing to read

#278 to #276 - jingleforth

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I got it for helping admin on some technical stuff.

Is permanent.

I didn't get to choose the color.

#356 to #278 - anon id: ffe39956

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

i like the text color

#279 to #278 - magtheicelander

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

admin has cursed you

#289 to #14 - bingothepanda

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Take panda instead, we way better

#77 to #14 - brisineo

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Don't loose hope. I was severely allergic to cats most of my life, but then I suddenly realized when I woke up from a nap one day at a friend's house to find his cat on my chest, that I wasn't allergic anymore.

I dunno how, but I think it's because of just being in a place with several cats nearby, but not enough to cause anything bad. Get used to it, bit by bit, per se. It's worth a shot.

#36 to #14 - irishlawyer

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Just saying, wouldn't that be good on the janitor's part?
I mean, isn't having it in a bag better than having it all over the floor and whatnot?

#41 to #36 - jingleforth

Reply +6 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Most people probably wouldn't piss in the floor.

But really.

What would YOU do? If you accidentally let that thing escape your grip for even a second, you're going to be showered in the piss of a bunch of random guys.

How do you fit it through the door? How do you prevent it from collapsing?

Whoever had to deal with this, was not having a good day.

#47 to #41 - irishlawyer

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Unless you get a bit crafty with it, he could siphon it out, he could try to drain it out into a different container, I can't think of anything right now but I don't know what he has on hand, he could figure something out man

#111 to #47 - alexthebest

Reply +13 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Awww yeahhh, get that mouth-siphon going.

#184 to #47 - nogphille

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

just pop the ******* bag.
toilets like these have small drains in the middle to facilitate cleanups.

pop the bag, urine drains through hole, flush it all down with water, start scrubbing!

#53 to #14 - kaboozle123

Reply +5 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

how are you allergic to huskies? like what's different about huskies that makes you allergic apposed to other dogs?

#436 to #53 - alleksi

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

There are different factors that take place when it comes to allergies.

Most people are allergic to the dander (dead skin), urine and saliva.
Long haired dogs often cause more allergies because the dander gets spread more easily, whether it gets stuck to the hair which will cause allergic reactions via touch, or it gets spread around more easily as long haired dogs often shed fur more, which causes allergic reactions just by being close to the dog.

Obviously some dogs create more dander than other dogs, so the level of allergic reactions you get from a dog varies between every dog.

#314 to #53 - akkere

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Some people (like me) are allergic to dogs with longer hair.

#189 to #53 - adplum

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

very long hair in large amounts?

#73 to #14 - racetothebottom

Reply +24 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

do you ever feel
like a plastic bag?

filled with urination
looking to start again?

#213 to #73 - rokulda

Reply +8 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

do you ever feel
feel like leaking out

letting your urine fall
out of you onto the ground

#60 - coolioplasm

Reply +107 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

But seriously that is such a good thing you did. Good job.

#107 to #60 - vaporous

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

As far as I'm concerned confession bear is supposed to be used to confess things that OP is ashamed of, hence the bear looking so sad. So I don't mind confession bear if used that way. But using a picture of a really sad bear as you describe something that you are proud of seems irrelevant. Plus its hardly a confession when its only really a secret to the orginal dog owner.
TLDR I only like when confession bear its used correctly.

#75 to #60 - geofalke

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

that would be "unpopular opinion puffin"

#83 - ninegagxd

Reply -49 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I'll admit the neighbors were wrong, but you were even more wrong by stealing that dog. It's certainly not anything to brag about on the internet, OP. **** you.

#89 to #83 - carlosramon

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

It wasn't their dog. After all, it wasn't chipped and probably had no other identification.

#274 to #83 - dawggz

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

He did the least wrong that needed to be done. Taking away an animal from abuse to a welcoming place is something that NEEDS to be done . Pic related.

#298 to #83 - anon id: 094c58b8

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Guys, this guy is an obvious troll, just check his name. Ill upvote this ****** to 0 :3

#307 to #83 - wthhhh

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

are you ******* retarded?

#368 to #83 - iviagic

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#379 to #83 - anon id: 6f9dbe11

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

why dont you ******* kill yourself

#85 to #83 - joshuaww

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Well... he's not bragging technically. It's the shameful confession bear. Implying, despite the ultimate good it did, he's not totally proud of it.

#86 to #85 - anon id: a0d14db0

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

> Implying confession bear isn't just a way of bragging on the internet now

#87 to #86 - joshuaww

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii guess...

Kinda

sorta

maybe

a little bit

#210 to #83 - soquelknight

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Yeah i agree with lego dude and so does everyone else...your a faggot gtfo

#97 to #83 - stringfingerable

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

By that being more wrong, you imply that it would've been better to leave the dog alone for it to continue suffering?

#102 to #97 - ninegagxd

Reply -4 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Just call the cops. No need to steal. Besides, it's there dog and they can do with it what they want

#129 to #102 - amishparadise

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

You'd really be surprised how little we can do sometimes.

#121 to #102 - legodude

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

He called the RSPCA basically cops in the UK for the treatment of animals... And no they can't do what they want, loads of laws protecting animals

Just like saying she is my daughter and I'll do as I want, I'm making her fight snakes

#130 to #121 - chism

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

i'd watch that fight. just sayin

#141 to #121 - ninegagxd

Reply -3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

the RSPCA is the Royal Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. They are a charitable organisation and have no authority. They are not "basically the cops". **** you, you retarded piece of ****. Come back with a well reasoned argument

#142 to #141 - legodude

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

They have the power to remove animals from their owners under the Animal Welfare Act 2006.... oh and by the way "**** you, you retarded piece of ****. Come back with a well reasoned argument"

#144 to #121 - ninegagxd

Reply -5 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Dogs are property, humans are not. That daughter analogy was stupid as hell
Sorry I called you a faggot

#145 to #144 - legodude

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

dogs are living creatures and are protected by laws, I fail to see the difference

#148 to #145 - ninegagxd

Reply -3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

They AREN'T ******* HUMAN! Get that through your head, you furry. Yes, dogs are protected by laws, but not the same laws that protect humans. You inability to see any difference may be a sign of autism. Go get yourself checked.

#308 to #148 - wthhhh

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

you must be fun at parties faggot.

#151 to #148 - legodude

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Wow someone is pissed, you might want to go see a therapist.

#88 to #83 - queenjester

Reply +46 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

>Original owners beating, starving and mistreating innocent dog
>It escapes because its had enough of their ****
>Found by good neighbor and given to a loving home where it will be properly cared for the rest of its life
Yeah, I totally see why the neighbor is pure evil T_T

#99 to #88 - pokemonstheshiz

Reply +5 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

>implying none of that story was exaggerated to make OP seem like the good guy

#158 to #88 - ninegagxd

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Oh, and see comment #55, *********

#101 to #88 - ninegagxd

Reply -4 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I never said that. I just pointed out that you CAN'T ******* STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S DOGS.

If you find something and you keep it, you're stealing. If you give it to someone else, you're stealing.

#162 - anon id: 79068746

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

who cares if the dogs not spaced or has its shots its a dog!

#204 to #162 - thebrownydestroyer **User deleted account**

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Dick

#175 to #162 - gunslayer

Reply +7 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

#171 to #162 - slyve

Reply +29 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Well, aren't you a lovely little cunt.

#411 to #171 - noobtastic

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

sir, as a person known to many as a "cunt", I'd like to say that it is degrading for you to compare this piece of emotionless human trash to us.

#8 - boylan

Reply +22 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

My huskey

#20 to #8 - hurrdurka

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Is he always this angry or is it his normal facial expression?

#26 to #20 - cancerlobster

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Not my dog, but I'd bet that's what he/she normally looks like. Huskies seem to commonly grow fur patterns on their face that make them appear pissed off when they're not.

#245 to #8 - harbingerwolf

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

<--- Mine.

Oh wait...

You dont know how much this comment section is killing me knowing i couldnt accomadate one.

#341 to #8 - bronyquest

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

#173 to #8 - Dember

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

My youngest husky / low-content wolfdog.

#63 to #8 - edmin

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Not mine

#10 to #8 - kaslin

Reply +5 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Mine.

#40 to #8 - flyingdragon

Reply +7 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Mine.

#174 to #40 - Dember

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Looks a bit like my husky's mother, Shasta. c:
She's a short-coated Siberian from sprint racing lines.

#185 to #174 - sportsmaniac

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

Her eyes are so pretty!

#192 to #185 - Dember

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(11/30/2013) [-]

I agree. I've seen a lot of Siberians, but this one has some unusually vibrant blue eyes and even light blue pupils. Her father did as well - and so does her daughter, my husky Taylo.