The Mona Lisa. Kind of interesting. I think Da Vinci's apprentice was just as good, his even looks more like a woman, but Da Vinci's has more depth.. Wade' s Mo Presevered Paint
x
Click to expand

The Mona Lisa

The Mona Lisa. Kind of interesting. I think Da Vinci's apprentice was just as good, his even looks more like a woman, but Da Vinci's has more depth.. Wade' s Mo

Kind of interesting. I think Da Vinci's apprentice was just as good, his even looks more like a woman, but Da Vinci's has more depth.

Wade' s Mona Lisa. Painted along side Vinci by
his apprentice: But the paint was preserved.
showing us what the masterpiece would have
looked like in 151?...
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1634
Views: 58611
Favorited: 121
Submitted: 06/23/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to jinxter submit to reddit

Comments(168):

[ 168 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#104 - pewdiepieisbestpie (06/24/2014) [+] (23 replies)
stickied by jinxter
Found the original version!
#6 - benschien ONLINE (06/23/2014) [+] (3 replies)
**benschien rolls 77**
#2 - Sworley ONLINE (06/23/2014) [-]
da vinci's better apprentice
#26 - ampharosrules (06/23/2014) [-]
Yeah. More depth.
#8 - com ONLINE (06/23/2014) [+] (5 replies)
i believe this the best version
#9 - spongebobsleg (06/23/2014) [+] (3 replies)
I prefer this version.
#28 - Tyranitar ONLINE (06/23/2014) [+] (2 replies)
Did somebody say Draaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaven?
#4 - samoaspider ONLINE (06/23/2014) [-]
Da Vinci's is still better, I mean c'mon, more cleavage
Da Vinci's is still better, I mean c'mon, more cleavage
#32 - almostninja (06/24/2014) [-]
God bless the internet
#57 - baditch (06/24/2014) [-]
My attempt. The similarities are stunning.
#44 - teasquid (06/24/2014) [-]
Now that I see the difference, the one that I'm used to seeing looks like it has some bad instagram filter.
Now that I see the difference, the one that I'm used to seeing looks like it has some bad instagram filter.
#112 - thechosentroll (06/24/2014) [-]
Leonardo later came across a more inspiring model.
#122 - breadposter (06/24/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Fixed
#51 - Ken M (06/24/2014) [+] (9 replies)
**anonymous rolled image**
User avatar #69 to #51 - dissectedtesticle (06/24/2014) [-]
girl in the middle. the belly button. where did it run off to?
#35 - vlademitrius (06/24/2014) [+] (2 replies)
just sayin
#49 to #35 - anangrytaco (06/24/2014) [-]
Please dont bro
Please dont bro
#95 - captnnorway (06/24/2014) [+] (2 replies)
I never got this. Mona Lisa is a really good painting and all, but there must be other better pictures out there. The face just looks so unnatural, and now the whole thing is faded away almost, making it so a lot of depth and contrasts are lost. I'm not much of an artist though, but I still think pictures like this are way more impressive.
User avatar #12 - franklyimaperson (06/23/2014) [+] (8 replies)
Art Fags, explain this to me, why is Mona Lisa considered a masterpiece? It seems to be little more than an average portrait of some random woman, that time and time again has been shown to be easily reproduced, so what's the deal
#21 to #12 - andrakian ONLINE (06/23/2014) [-]
Its not the picture itself, its what it represents. A 500 hundred years old painting, the masterpiece of one of the most brilliant men who ever lived, in an age and place of art flourishing unlike any other at least until modern times, but by the XX century start the painting was already seen as the most precious art piece ever so its not just the picture, its the "symbol of the italian renaissance" status that come with it.
#16 - KrazyKitteh (06/23/2014) [+] (2 replies)
#48 - Ken M (06/24/2014) [+] (1 reply)
[ 168 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)