That's a pretty rich ginger
We got mar? , and (oaks,
as well, so you know,
That' s pretti" camming
from a ginger
as well, so you know,
That' s pretti" camming
from a ginger
...
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
79 comments displayed.
#1
-
fatbasturd (12/22/2015) [-] these two dudes seem like good role models. Rich as fock but still fight in their military
#55 to #36
-
borderlineparanoid ONLINE (12/23/2015) [-] did they also poison out water supply, burn our crops and deliver a plague on our houses?
#72 to #45
-
distortedflare ONLINE (12/23/2015) [-] He is mentaly retarded and a bigot what do you expect.
#75 to #74
-
distortedflare ONLINE (12/23/2015) [-] No the royal family are from Germany originally and royal families were renowned for inbreeding to keep the blood lines "Pure" this lead to malformations. The comment was still stupid.
#66 to #36
-
ndiliciousa (12/23/2015) [-] Yeah, I totally remember that one time when they went on the streets and randomly started to rape people.
Good times
Good times
#25 to #19
-
fatbasturd (12/23/2015) [-] I meant their down to Earth attitude. rich still fight a long peasants you get mme? Idgaf who they are at least they are not dicks about being rich I know Harry is but the older dude seems like a better one to be a role model
#24 to #21
-
fatbasturd (12/23/2015) [-] look at their military past though. I wish I was rich and could do the **** they do. Im not English so I don't know all their personal info.
#27 to #24
-
jordoguy (12/23/2015) [-] Yeah that's great and everything but there's plenty more people in the army more worthy of role models, the only difference is these guys are super rich. Don't be under the impression that all English people love the Royal family or are interested in anything they do. I only know that Harry got a D because of a comedian.
#4 to #1
-
redplasticcup ONLINE (12/22/2015) [-] Do they ever fight though or is it all just for publicity?
#5 to #4
-
fatbasturd (12/22/2015) [-] I seen a video of the ginger one in combat before on the news so I'm guessing yes they fight for real.
#9 to #4
-
postie (12/23/2015) [-] Harry helped the Gurkha troops repel a Taliban attack, and patrolled hostile areas of Afghanistan during his first tour.
During his second tour, he served as an Apache co-pilot and gunner.
William served on the HMS Iron Duke and was part of a joint operation with the US Coast Guard that captured a speedboat carrying 900kg of cocaine. He then moved onto being a search-and-rescue pilot, and then an air ambulance pilot.
During his second tour, he served as an Apache co-pilot and gunner.
William served on the HMS Iron Duke and was part of a joint operation with the US Coast Guard that captured a speedboat carrying 900kg of cocaine. He then moved onto being a search-and-rescue pilot, and then an air ambulance pilot.
#23 to #9
-
angelusprimus (12/23/2015) [-] To be fair, helping Gurkha usually means "stay out of the way until the screams stop".
But yes, they actively participated, weren't just window dressing.
But yes, they actively participated, weren't just window dressing.
#13 to #11
-
fatbasturd (12/23/2015) [-] sounds like a good Idea. but isn't that how monarchs are supposed to be? the king leads them into battle or something?
#14 to #13
-
processing (12/23/2015) [-] Sure back in the day when they were basically glorified tribe leaders. I don't think we should have them at all. And definitely those two shouldnt be princes of Wales.
I think if you volunteer it shouldn't be influenced by family or anything that's not you though, which I suspect they have been.
I think if you volunteer it shouldn't be influenced by family or anything that's not you though, which I suspect they have been.
#17 to #14
-
aabbccddeeffgghhii (12/23/2015) [-] I don't understand why people want to abolish the Royals.
They give more money back to the economy than they take, they have little to no real power so they do not run our country and they add a level of prestige to our country that others simply do not have.
Why get rid of them? They're nothing but a benefit to our society. The nation loves them and the world does too. Whats the problem?
They give more money back to the economy than they take, they have little to no real power so they do not run our country and they add a level of prestige to our country that others simply do not have.
Why get rid of them? They're nothing but a benefit to our society. The nation loves them and the world does too. Whats the problem?
#18 to #17
-
processing (12/23/2015) [-] The money they 'give back' is basically tourism buildings and history.
If the Royals go does the history go to? 'Will it not be there when I get back? '
They get given high level documentation, tell me they're not involved with running the country? The Prince Charles letters basically say bollocks to that notion fy ffrind.
Yeah the world loves them so much that commonwealth countries are taking them off the money amongst other things.
If the Royals go does the history go to? 'Will it not be there when I get back? '
They get given high level documentation, tell me they're not involved with running the country? The Prince Charles letters basically say bollocks to that notion fy ffrind.
Yeah the world loves them so much that commonwealth countries are taking them off the money amongst other things.
#22 to #18
-
aabbccddeeffgghhii (12/23/2015) [-] "The World" doesn't just mean the common wealth. The world loves the royal family because they're exotic, different and exiting. Remember when Kate was pregnant? The world went crazy over the birth of a future King. You cannot buy that publicity.
Of course the common wealth is removing her from their money. She has little connections with their country and is a hold over from our colonial past. Its different for the UK because she sits on the throne here, but on the other side of the planet in Australia why should they have her on their money?
Also, **** yeah history goes too. How many people going to France too see old castles or palaces that monarchs haven't lived in for over a hundred years? How about Germany? Poland? Italy? All monarchies at one point or another, no royal tourism.
And i'll tell you; They are not involved in running the country. At all. If the Queen actually started to try running the country the monarchy would be abolished. Sure they have influence, but so do multi billion pound companies. Should we abolish them too?
Of course the common wealth is removing her from their money. She has little connections with their country and is a hold over from our colonial past. Its different for the UK because she sits on the throne here, but on the other side of the planet in Australia why should they have her on their money?
Also, **** yeah history goes too. How many people going to France too see old castles or palaces that monarchs haven't lived in for over a hundred years? How about Germany? Poland? Italy? All monarchies at one point or another, no royal tourism.
And i'll tell you; They are not involved in running the country. At all. If the Queen actually started to try running the country the monarchy would be abolished. Sure they have influence, but so do multi billion pound companies. Should we abolish them too?
#64 to #28
-
aabbccddeeffgghhii (12/23/2015) [-] Like I said, its understandable for those in the commonwealth to dislkie them, but generally the world loves them.
#26 to #22
-
processing (12/23/2015) [-] Do you think people should be treated differently and revered, given every oppurtunity and the best of everything, because they had different parents to you?
#49 to #26
-
goblinraider (12/23/2015) [-]
If they take along the responsibilities that come with it, I see no issue.
Like not making an ass of themselves in public.
Like not making an ass of themselves in public.
#63 to #26
-
aabbccddeeffgghhii (12/23/2015) [-] Get off your high horse. Do you honestly think the Royal Family is going for the same Jobs Joe Blog goes for? No, they're job is full time royalty.
Sure they get the best education around but they don't go into business or trades with them, they go to galas and balls and political events.
People who dislike the royals dislike them out of principle. There is no ecomonic or social reason to get rid of the monarchy people just get pissy that someone has a crow which, in this day and age, means **** all.
Sure they get the best education around but they don't go into business or trades with them, they go to galas and balls and political events.
People who dislike the royals dislike them out of principle. There is no ecomonic or social reason to get rid of the monarchy people just get pissy that someone has a crow which, in this day and age, means **** all.
#3 to #2
-
fatbasturd (12/22/2015) [-] yep I'm aware but I know most people are not These two dudes are like our generation though.
#39 to #38
-
mondominiman ONLINE (12/23/2015) [-] Do they fight, has someone ever died in combat? Or are they doing desk jobs 500 miles from the front line but they're "still in the military"
#40 to #39
-
SirFail (12/23/2015) [-] They go into combat ops. Harry(the red head) in particular has been in a few fire fights in Afghanistan as part of an Apache team and served two tours in Afghanistan whereas Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, has served in the RAF as a search and rescue pilot and air ambulance but i dont recall any royals being wounded recently.
#52 to #40
-
bwiedieter (12/23/2015) [-]
Harry´s base also got shelled by mortars on telly. They were doing an interview with him and suddenly everything had to go really quick.
#57 to #39
-
Gandalfthewhite (12/23/2015) [-] Prince harry has something like 11 confirmed kills, i think he's a helicopter gunner
#67 to #38
-
lennybrown (12/23/2015) [-] Correct me if am wrong but I thought it was a requirement to earn there title by joining the armed forces for a few year sort of like a royal family military service, I thing its something to to with an order of chivalry (A type of knighthood, those huge breast stars they where on there uniform).
#80 to #67
-
alcantara ONLINE (12/23/2015) [-] Most of them are wearing the Order of the Garter as a Royal Knight of the Garter; the award is effectively by merit of their status in the immediate Royal Family - a lot of foreign royalty are also awarded and able to wear such.
It's just a tradition to serve in the armed forces; they don't need to do it in order to assume their royal status or any such thing.
It's just a tradition to serve in the armed forces; they don't need to do it in order to assume their royal status or any such thing.
#46
-
xsap (12/23/2015) [-] who don't rich people like him and trump just get hair implants. its expansive and long processes where they re plant hair in your head and it grows and **** like real hair. tosh.0 guy did it. he was balding in season 1
#51 to #46
-
fuzzyballs (12/23/2015) [-] it doesn't look that great though
and they take hair from your ass and very painfully put it in your scalp one by one
and they take hair from your ass and very painfully put it in your scalp one by one
#44
-
stealingbikes ONLINE (12/23/2015) [-] I like how these dudes are royalty but aren't afraid to bag on each other and just be brothers, even when the media is watching.
Hell I wouldn't pass up the opportunity to have a pint with them.
Hell I wouldn't pass up the opportunity to have a pint with them.
#41
-
anon (12/23/2015) [-]
William has always been, and will always be one sexy ass mother ******* piece of royal booty.
#6
-
theokkeli (12/23/2015) [-] **theokkeli used "*roll picture*"**
**theokkeli rolled image** he looks like a slimmed down version of the "gingers have souls" dude
**theokkeli rolled image** he looks like a slimmed down version of the "gingers have souls" dude
#76
-
burryluciano (12/23/2015) [-] U.S. & German Soldiers Working Together - Weapons Familiarization Range
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMi0PYk5Zcs
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMi0PYk5Zcs
#58
-
anon (12/23/2015) [-]
they have a competition to see who can eat the most infant babies each year.
#56
-
qnamanmanga (12/23/2015) [-] Redheads>Gingers. It's not the same thing. And If you are a guy, you physicall appearance has almost no matter to survive. Even Stephen Hawking had 3 hoes. Everything, what you need to do, is ability to raise childrens.
#48
-
anon (12/23/2015) [-]
Kids....when you're older, maybe you'll realise...your opinions...no one cares.
#43
-
piratedangel (12/23/2015) [-] Prince Harry Compares War to PlayStation, and Taliban Are Not Amused
thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/prince-harry-compares-war-to-playstation-and-taliban-is-not-amused/?_r=0
thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/prince-harry-compares-war-to-playstation-and-taliban-is-not-amused/?_r=0
