Upload
Login or register
x

That comment.

VICE
These attacks cannot remain unpunished."
Anonymous Hacking Group Declares War en
Islamic State Following Paris Attacks
news's.. aice. ccm
d, Like I Comment A Share
7, 828 people like this.
Erik Zee
Not the 72 virgins they were expecting.
2 hears age . Unlike . is 1. . Reply
...
+2023
Views: 64129
Favorited: 127
Submitted: 11/17/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to philopsychological

Comments(254):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 254 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
156 comments displayed.
User avatar #12 - huszti (11/17/2015) [-]
>VICE
User avatar #14 to #12 - philopsychological [OP](11/17/2015) [-]
>funnyjunk
User avatar #15 to #14 - huszti (11/17/2015) [-]
fair point
#157 to #15 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
#106 - joxa (11/17/2015) [-]
Obligatory.
#3 - donfailed ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
I'll be honest here, I had no idea they were even still around. They do anything noteworthy lately other than this?
-57
#112 to #3 - kingoftheanonymous has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #142 to #135 - ThatFatMummy (11/17/2015) [-]
But.... they do.
Like reveal the names of pedophiles & KKK members. Both of which happened in like the past month or so.
#150 to #142 - sandmantaxman (11/17/2015) [-]
He's responding to how he looks like a faggot with the Guy Faux* mask and the way he worded his comment.

Top Cringe
#170 to #150 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Dont forget the username"kingoftheanonymous""
User avatar #207 to #142 - kingoftheanonymous (11/18/2015) [-]
thats what i was going for... these guys were just dicks about my name, lol. i thought the name was funny when i made it. if i could, i would change it to Jasontheloser
#211 to #207 - sandmantaxman (11/18/2015) [-]
Stop posting

Get off the internet

Destroy your hard drive, ram and motherboard

and re-evaluate you life.
User avatar #213 to #211 - kingoftheanonymous (11/18/2015) [-]
who says i should listen to some asshole over the internet? it's too late at night for me to deal with ******** .
#214 to #213 - sandmantaxman (11/18/2015) [-]
It's funny because you will never learn how to be normal and have normal conversations

This makes me smile
User avatar #215 to #214 - kingoftheanonymous (11/18/2015) [-]
Define "normal".
#217 to #215 - sandmantaxman (11/18/2015) [-]
Everything you aren't

I see people like you at walmart sometimes and it is just a sweat pile of cringe

Peace
#251 to #217 - anon (12/01/2015) [-]
You are more cringe than him goddamn how do you manage that?
User avatar #218 to #217 - kingoftheanonymous (11/18/2015) [-]
i know im not normal. but neither are you. you literally have nothing better to do but to argue about some frivolous ******** . Go to sleep, it's late. Let's continue this conversation tomorrow?
#224 to #219 - halli (11/18/2015) [-]
don't use lol faggot
#249 to #224 - anon (11/27/2015) [-]
Lol
#164 to #3 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Well as long as there are people who can use the internet to their own advantage, and what is considered good, then they'll probably be around. It's just a title. It could lose all of it's "members" and then make a comeback when a group of people that can actually do **** decide they want to be called that because it has history.
User avatar #117 to #3 - infinitereaper (11/17/2015) [-]
They pretty much ruined cheese pizza for a while. Pepperoni loving fags.
#154 to #3 - holmesc (11/17/2015) [-]
The real anonymous do they usually keep quiet until they've done something major such as shutdown down child porn sites. The people that wear masks and call themselves anonymous (90-95% of the group imo) are jokes.

So yea, feel free to laugh at them.
#4 to #3 - coruptangel (11/17/2015) [-]
as far as i know they were pretty much turned into a joke once reddit got a hold of them ad they haven't really done anything worth mentioning in the past couple of years.
User avatar #7 to #4 - loctos (11/17/2015) [-]
I think they've taken down a couple pedophile websites in recent memory.
#10 to #4 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
its not that they have been turned into a joke, its that wanna be hacker kids bandwagon the anonymous symbol
User avatar #181 to #4 - yojo (11/17/2015) [-]
Ashley Madison and KKK members. Those were pretty recent
User avatar #80 to #3 - freebrainsforall (11/17/2015) [-]
The Ashley Madison hack? That was a pretty huge deal a while back.
User avatar #116 to #80 - therockofshame ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
>a while back
User avatar #133 to #80 - zorach (11/17/2015) [-]
That was anonsmoose?
User avatar #8 to #3 - yargibtim (11/17/2015) [-]
They released members of ashley madison. and most recently they released members list of the KKK. which included several governors and some senators/congressmen.
User avatar #27 to #8 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
also, couple of years back they fought the mexican cartels...and lost...badly..
User avatar #28 to #27 - xsnowbanex (11/17/2015) [-]
Whoa man. Gotta elaborate on that
User avatar #30 to #28 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
basically anonymous somehow got a hold of locations and names of all of the big dogs for..i think it was zetas or some other cartel, and were going to publish it.


then the zetas simply replied that if the anonymous posted what they knew online, they would go and slaughter an entire village full of people.


needless to say anonymous backed off..
User avatar #53 to #30 - powerlesscheese (11/17/2015) [-]
then release it incognito
User avatar #54 to #53 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
and zetas would have gone and killed everybody in some random village anyway just because there is a chance anonymous was involved.


also anonymous is incognito..i mean the whole point of the whole thing was that you can just put on a mask,not tell your names, and you would be part of it...that was the whole main flaggel about it back in the day...
User avatar #57 to #54 - powerlesscheese (11/17/2015) [-]
i mean slip the documents to officials without letting the zetas know so they can act before there is even a chance for a massacre. On the other hand this means the Mexican officials would actually have to do something about it which is unlikely given how many are on their payroll.
User avatar #59 to #57 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
that would have worked up until the level where

a)mexican cops show up,a huge shootout happens(seriously taking down a cartel boss is like waging a war these days..) and then they would command their troops to kill another city

b) mexican cops show up, capture the cartel lords, and the cartels go shoot up a city.



ofcourse most likely the zetas went out and destroyed some town anyway...so i think they should have just sent the evidence online... i mean, just an offhand remark from the cartels about killing someone in some town is enough to make the whole town evacuate should tell us that there is no point in fretting about them doing something they already do on daily basis...
#177 to #54 - obliviscor (11/17/2015) [-]
Doing it anyway would've sent the message that that **** doesn't work.
#173 to #53 - lncognito (11/17/2015) [-]
NEVER
User avatar #34 to #30 - heartlessrobot (11/17/2015) [-]
>Not attaching improvised explosives to drones and raining them on Cartel buildings
plebs.
User avatar #31 to #30 - xsnowbanex (11/17/2015) [-]
WhoaTakeItEasyMan.gif
User avatar #63 to #30 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
I thought they captured one of the anonfags and killed him, then the rest of them pussed out.
User avatar #64 to #63 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
idk.

highly likely. cartels dont **** around in anything..
User avatar #65 to #64 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
Lol, neither does ISIS. Anon is just going to get ****** again if they try to mess with bloodthirsty terrorists.
User avatar #66 to #65 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
isis pales in comparison to cartels in terms of tech savvy and brutality i would claim..

they only beat cartels in size and military might. and even then i wouldnt put it above cartels to be stronger than them since many of the cartels are made out of ex special forces operatives....
User avatar #70 to #66 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
As if ISIS doesn't receive training and aid from foreign powers.

Many of the cartels are just tattooed up delinquents who grew up in slums and picked up gun/drug running since it paid and they had no other option.

Though, a lot of cops and politicians are on their pay role.
User avatar #72 to #70 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
actually most of isis is second world citizens with no education.

zetas( the cartel i have been throwing around lately) was made up when a mexican special operatives military group went rogue. they are known for their ruthlesness, and for being completely ********** insane.
User avatar #73 to #72 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
Some of their original members were ex military yeah, but that doesn't mean all of their members now are.

Nonetheless, I don't see why you're trying to compare them.
User avatar #78 to #73 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
you are the one who brought them up :/
User avatar #79 to #78 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
I wasn't comparing them. I was just stating they're going to find themselves in a similar mess and run away. Again.
User avatar #84 to #79 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
well thats where it started. anyhow.


and isis with its 200 000+ members isnt as highly trained(not even their original crew was as highly trained) as the zetas are/were. unless you believe the americans training them stuff. but we have no evidence of that...tho i wouldnt be surprised if it was true...


also it isnt "some of them" with zetas. the original crew and the main body of them are literally ex military. thats why they became so notorious, they had the firepower,the skills and the ruthlesness of a professional. quickly establishing themselves as the dominant cartel. or atleast among the big three.
User avatar #94 to #84 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
Lol, it doesn't really matter if 1% of them have military training or not. Most of the newer people they recruit are probably what I've said earlier. That's how cartels get big. They tempt poor people to do jobs for them. Very similar to what ISIS does. As for ISIS though, some of the people they recruit are also westerners.

God damn, it's weird yet intriguing how antagonistic people on this site are, even when you're agreeing with them.
User avatar #96 to #94 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
and they also keep hiring experts from around the globe to work for them, specially zetas who have hackers on their payroll. they have a lot more claim to being tech and military savvy than isis does.


and i dont understand the hostility in your add on message? have i insulted you somehow??
User avatar #97 to #96 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
Many major criminal/terrorist groups like that hire people like that now. Even if ISIS and Zetas did go to war with each other, ISIS could still be a threat, especially if they displayed they're more than capable of pulling off attacks on other parts of the world like in Paris.

How is that hostile?
User avatar #99 to #97 - angelious (11/17/2015) [-]
i never said isis isnt a threat. or that they would lose to zetas in combat. in fact i said that isis would win zetas in combat simply because their size(and therefore their predicted threat) is larger than zetas. i however mentioned how isis most likely isnt as militaristically skilled, nor as well equipped as zetas due to their background and location.




seemed to be somewhat passive agressive to me.
#165 to #70 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
FOREIGN powers? You have a lot to learn about ISIS, boy. They're not some jihad and their funding has been linked back to America at their founding. They've been getting aid from interested republican financial backers. My best guess from those facts is they want to use ISIS as a boogeyman to create political clout.
User avatar #171 to #165 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
How exactly are you disagreeing with my statement?
User avatar #101 to #63 - paranoidmuffin (11/17/2015) [-]
I think that was what started the whole thing. those were bloggers that spoke out against Zetas so they tracked the bloggers down and hung them from a bridge
User avatar #103 to #101 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
Couldn't sworn an anon got decapitated or something.
#56 to #8 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Pretty sure Ashley Madison wasn't anonymous, just some disgruntled employee.
User avatar #62 to #56 - yargibtim (11/17/2015) [-]
ashley madison was indeed anon
User avatar #50 to #3 - guylongname (11/17/2015) [-]
The problem with that question is that there is no "they", as in they're not a group, but anonymous is really just a name anyone can take to do something they believe that follows the values of "anonymous". Whoever released this video may well be a group of hackers that might do something positive, but they're also faggots for trying to gain fame (although I've not seen the video and they may just be trying to inspire more aggression towards ISIS)
#69 to #50 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Finally someone who understands concept of anon's
#77 to #50 - thetheorrist (11/17/2015) [-]
They actually put around 150 sites of is and isis down in a year and several thousands twitter and co accounts which is quite produtive if you think about the fact that IS is recruiting alot over the internet
User avatar #88 to #77 - heartlessrobot (11/17/2015) [-]
Yeah but now they don't need the internet, they've been personally invited into Europe to recruit in person.
#90 to #88 - thetheorrist (11/17/2015) [-]
still think about it how many people that are capable of doing something like this can you find outside and how many on the internet? i mean just look at this site
#166 to #88 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
And here comes the ignorance train.
#60 - itsapirateslife (11/17/2015) [-]
> related pretty much the same but a little funnier imo
#152 to #60 - sandmantaxman (11/17/2015) [-]
Yeah, I'm sure they will do a number on their Facebook and Twitter accounts.
User avatar #180 to #152 - itsapirateslife (11/17/2015) [-]
Well, they use it as a weapon. Be it by recruiting or spreading hate. So shutting it down does actually have an impact though 'getting ******* might be a little strong, yes :p
#182 to #180 - sandmantaxman (11/17/2015) [-]
They aren't going to do **** .

"Anoglumuz" is a paper tiger who gets promoted by reddit neckbeards who watched some documentary on the illuminati and Big banks.

They just do **** to for attention. All they can do is post account information about them just like they did with the KKK.

When you have multiple countries from the G20 funding and supplying them, they really can't do **** .
#185 to #184 - sandmantaxman (11/17/2015) [-]
Oh man.

That's really going to hinder them...
User avatar #186 to #185 - itsapirateslife (11/17/2015) [-]
Yes they over-dramatize, no they won't 'be the downfall of ISIS', but it's something hence the picture i added.... what have you done so far? except complain about other people trying to make a difference? not saying i make a difference, but i'm not the one complaining
#187 to #186 - sandmantaxman (11/17/2015) [-]
Fought in theatre on 2 deployments to Afghanistan.

And I don't go around promoting it like Anonymous does. Just ******* do **** in the dark and keep it there. No one ******* cares if you got 900 twitter accounts banned.

What have you done, besides critique others on what they have done?
User avatar #189 to #187 - itsapirateslife (11/18/2015) [-]
Afghanistan. Sure buddy. I didn't critique anyone on what they have done. I was in fact defending what anonymous is doing. are you even paying attention?
#190 to #189 - sandmantaxman (11/18/2015) [-]
Keep crying faggot.

You will do something with your life, I'm sure.
User avatar #195 to #190 - thegamepixel (11/18/2015) [-]
He posts from the grave.
www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=20300640
stop being a cunt
#196 to #195 - sandmantaxman (11/18/2015) [-]
WTF?

How is my picture on there?

I'm SGT Biggerstaff. What the **** ?
#198 to #197 - sandmantaxman (11/18/2015) [-]
Those aren't me dude. What the **** ?
User avatar #228 to #199 - itsapirateslife (11/18/2015) [-]
lol, thanks. you ******* champ.
User avatar #226 to #198 - itsapirateslife (11/18/2015) [-]
******* rekt mate.
User avatar #229 to #227 - itsapirateslife (11/18/2015) [-]
if by 'kek' you mean 'I'm pathetic, sorry i lied and used a dead soldiers picture to defend a stupid argument on the internet' then ok.
#230 to #229 - sandmantaxman (11/18/2015) [-]
yeah
User avatar #231 to #230 - itsapirateslife (11/18/2015) [-]
good.
User avatar #233 to #232 - itsapirateslife (11/18/2015) [-]
you're still a cunt.
#200 to #190 - bowservoltaire (11/18/2015) [-]
lol kek American soldiers being in Afghanistan is what started all this ****
#44 - sodaddict (11/17/2015) [-]
related
#43 - kaboomz (11/17/2015) [-]
WHAT ARE THEY GONNA HACK?
FACEBOOK PAGES?
THEY ARE A TERRORIST MILITARY FORCE
NOT INTERNET SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS
User avatar #134 to #43 - velho (11/17/2015) [-]
And also, Isis is probably using Deep net on communication with arms dealers and slavers etc.

Quick google and i found this article: edition.cnn.com/2015/05/12/politics/pentagon-isis-dark-web-google-internet/index.html
User avatar #67 to #43 - phawsy (11/17/2015) [-]
British defences has increased its cyber defence budget cause if they hack british air network they can down a lot of planes
User avatar #128 to #43 - velho (11/17/2015) [-]
Don't forget Bitcoins man, ISIS uses bitcoins alot.
User avatar #194 to #43 - marqueze (11/18/2015) [-]
Isis has been using social media for propoganda purposes and luring western people to join ISIS for a while now. Mainly sites such as facebook and twitter as you may imagine. Pages that wouldnt be taken down immediately because there is no country with jurisdiction over the internet or said social media.


Tl:dr, yes. they will hack facebook pages. and with good reason.
User avatar #98 to #43 - lametitan (11/17/2015) [-]
Cuts their communication with fellow members temporarily
more of a tiny stall tactic if anything
#153 to #43 - myjunk (11/17/2015) [-]
Also Terrorists need bank accounts.
They too need internet acces to coordinate themselves and publish propaganda videos (very important for recruitment).
#178 to #43 - obliviscor (11/17/2015) [-]
Let's forget that almost all of their recruiting is done online.
User avatar #49 to #43 - darthblam (11/17/2015) [-]
Actually, ISIS and **** does a lot of recruiting and communication through online means and even social media.

Though I doubt Anonymous could do anything better than what the FBI or CIA are already doing..
User avatar #58 to #49 - dorfdorfdorf (11/17/2015) [-]
as ******* if the fbi and cia can do **** . they have to do things within the law
User avatar #75 to #58 - unladenswallow (11/17/2015) [-]
FBI, yes. CIA? **** . Half the problems in the middle east are the CIA doing something over or under or around the law.
User avatar #76 to #75 - dorfdorfdorf (11/17/2015) [-]
yeah but not good stuff. saying anon couldnt do any better than the fbi or cia is like saying some costumed vigilante couldnt do any better than the gotham police department
#253 to #75 - anon (12/03/2015) [-]
Actually since the end of the Cold War the CIA has not broken U.S. law. Even in the case of "torture," the CIA was conducting legal enhanced interrogation techniques under the changed definition of torture. Bush changed the definition because had he not, the CIA would not have used those techniques. In the case of the FISA court and PRISM scandal, the CIA was still operating within the law, which is evident from the lack of court-ordered punishment after Snowden revealed the program. The reason congressmen pretend the CIA is a loose cannon is because it would be political suicide for them (especially the ones on the intelligence committee) to say "I was aware of the program the whole time, and approved of it." So instead the act like the CIA operated without orders, breaking the law.
In the case of cyber security, the CIA and FBI's hands are pretty much tied because they aren't allowed to back-track an attack back to the source if the attacker came through different servers before making the attack. I.E. if the white house is cyber attacked but the attacker went from a server in China, to wikipedia, to amazon, to Harvard, and then attacked the white house, the CIA is not allowed to reverse the prosses -- harvard, amazon, wikipedia, china -- in order to find the original source of the hack. This is why they always say "the attack might have come from x"
#85 to #75 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
FBI is worse, they ******* killed 40 people to pin it on a gang leader just to arrest him. The FBI and CIA are the biggest organized crime organizations in the world.
#110 to #43 - zielscheibe (11/17/2015) [-]
Well - ISIS has money on accounts in several arabic nations.
They get a **** ton of money with illegal oil trade - and both , the data of the buyers and the data that could lead the police / military to the money could be vital information.

Besides , they could get a witch hunt going and mark every member of deep-net ISIS / radical Islam meetings and bitcoin transfair to or from such people.

You do understand the importancy of the deep net for radicals and fanatics - drop the bomb on them there and they will have to send smoke signals to europe to coordinate terrorists attack's.

And drag them ******* out into the public - well , if you are good enough at gathering data and busting locks / passwords - you can steal all kind's of interesting things about a persons private life.

So you might find some of them radical ***** with the help of those neckbeards. They could eithe send their evidence straight to the police of the nation - or just begin to publicly post that evidence on FB and **** . So all the world know's you are a piece of **** , even before the cops kick in your door. ( but this is dangerous too , for if you blame some innocent guy - or let the cops loose on him ... you ****** up his day / life and loose any credebility )

Still , if they ( you never know hom many of them either have the skill , time or will to do so ) would use their knowledge of the deep net and gethering data , to fight ISIS. They could actually do some damage.


But this is just my two Shekels here
#167 to #110 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
They should turn their efforts inward. It's been long suspected and some anomalous-level proof here and there has shown that members of the right wing of our own government have been sending aid to ISIS (and Putin). We need to find out who these traitors are and expose them, no more media blacklist on this sort of information.
#203 to #167 - anon (11/18/2015) [-]
There is no "media blacklist" in the USA wtf. The way you specifically accused republicans tells me you got that from some insane liberal website. If that was true and it surfaced it would be a homerun for the democrat party. It would be all over the news. There would be a huge court trial.
User avatar #51 to #43 - kingdaniel (11/17/2015) [-]
ISIS uses social media to recruit radical Muslim males.
They a couple twitter accounts to prevent them from posting propaganda and recruit people.

It's something I guess, I thought it was ******** at first.
User avatar #162 to #51 - bigmanfifty (11/17/2015) [-]
They have a humungous online presence. Most of their recruits (especially in Europe) probably come from online.
User avatar #68 to #51 - Conquistador (11/17/2015) [-]
Even if they do attack their twitter pages or whatever, anonymous will still do little to no damage. Remember what happened when anonymous tried ******* with drug cartels?
#71 to #68 - kingdaniel (11/17/2015) [-]
As I said, ''It's something''
User avatar #139 to #68 - wobblewub (11/17/2015) [-]
no, what happened
#179 to #139 - obliviscor (11/17/2015) [-]
a cartel threatened to slaughter a village if the anonymoose released info, and like dumbasses backed off.
#204 to #179 - anon (11/18/2015) [-]
ISIS is already killing everyone though. That specific threat would not work.

Now if there were several hostages, maybe.
#205 to #204 - obliviscor (11/18/2015) [-]
Cartel. Drug cartel. The mexican drug cartel. not the ices.
#39 - solarisofcelestia (11/17/2015) [-]
That's great, but how are they going to hack into guns and bombs?
#95 to #39 - guanyu (11/17/2015) [-]
Like this.
#47 to #39 - zekeon ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
wa ley lu lei lo
#52 to #39 - drasticdragon (11/17/2015) [-]
Theyve reportedly revealed over 900 ISIS controlled twitter accounts and had them taken down. I guess this mean no more sweet vids
User avatar #55 to #52 - solarisofcelestia (11/17/2015) [-]
So they're slightly less lethal than a SJW mob from tumblr?
#151 to #55 - drasticdragon (11/17/2015) [-]
Its around about more than 3500 now, though who knows how inflated the number is
#22 - samoaspider (11/17/2015) [-]
I've been thinking for a while and seriously can't say we could think seriously about ononymoose. Maybe they'll hack into some Mohammed's e-mail but other than that they can't do **** about people hiding in the middle of nowhere with their guns and donkeys.
User avatar #25 to #22 - barakakaka (11/17/2015) [-]
Isis propaganda and recruitment works through internet. If they shut down their accounts and sites then they'll have no means of recruiting more people from Western nations.
User avatar #149 to #25 - philopsychological [OP](11/17/2015) [-]
its meh.
#202 to #25 - invisifat (11/18/2015) [-]
They have hindered their suicidal reserves. Now to whittle them down to the broken old farts that are at the center.
#122 - jokervsbatsy (11/17/2015) [-]
**** , those guys get **** done
#144 to #122 - catkyte (11/17/2015) [-]
those monsters..
#19 - qtrfuckinghazard (11/17/2015) [-]
I honestly don't know where you guys got the " 72 virgins in heaven" as a reward for muslims in heaven, it is not mentioned in the quran nor in the prophets hadeth.
User avatar #61 to #19 - Mortuus (11/17/2015) [-]
The '72 virgins' thing is mentioned in a terribly sourced Hadith, which is pretty much disregarded by most.
User avatar #23 to #19 - philopsychological [OP](11/17/2015) [-]
I don't know about the numbers of them but Ive read myself that in heaven there are angeli wives '' with invisible skin and with cloth which you can see-through yet remaining covert '' sorry for my sleepy english
Ya its true if you don't have a wife IRL...
User avatar #46 to #23 - fridgelogic (11/17/2015) [-]
No, not like that atleast. Hoor Ayn is what we call them, and they are more beautiful than any man has ever seen, for the unmarried, but no 72 virgins I have no idea where the **** that originated from, but there's nothing like that.
User avatar #83 to #19 - Nihatclodra (11/17/2015) [-]
It's actually a widespread mistranslation; it's actually "72 White Grapes".
User avatar #163 to #83 - itsthethai (11/17/2015) [-]
This false myth of "white raisins" originated from Christoph Luxenberg, a modern author writing under a pseudonym.[39] His anti-Islamic claim,[40] which has been accused of having a "Christian apologetic agenda",[41] is that the Qur'an was drawn from Christian Syro-Aramaic texts in the early 8th century, in order to evangelize the Arabs,[42] and that the Aramaic word 'hur' (white raisin) had been mistranslated by later Arab commentators into the Arabic word 'houri' (virgin).[43]

The Qur'an describes the physical characteristics of the houri in many places, and a reading of relevant verses show that Luxenberg's theory regarding heavenly white raisins is in error.

Raisins, which are dried grapes, cannot have large eyes,[17] big breasts,[20] cannot restrain their glances,[25] cannot be described as chaste,[25] or have any of the characteristics listed above. The Qur'an further states that men will be wed to these houri.[1] Men cannot be married to raisins or white grapes.

Additionally, for someone to accept this "72 raisins" theory, they would also have to accept that the Qur'an was not written by Allah or revealed to the Prophet Muhammad in Arabic during the 7th century, but was in fact written by Christian evangelists in Syro-Aramaic during the 8th century.

Purely copy-paste from wikIslam.
#132 to #83 - beffer (11/17/2015) [-]
a mistranslation it is but as far as I am informed it is not about grapes or 72 virgins,
is literally means"a 72 year old virgin"
Spread the news and pacify..
User avatar #111 - elcreepo (11/17/2015) [-]
Hasn't anonymous already declared war on ISIS though

At least a dozen times

If the US government intelligence can't seem to find a way to stop these sandfleas then why do they think they can

If they have access to computers, they're using them in a third world war zone and likely in places that can't be traced back to them or to places where the US is already aware of and can't do **** about
#174 to #111 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Had the same thought.
#141 to #111 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
Or.. They don't want to
User avatar #216 to #141 - elcreepo (11/18/2015) [-]
Why not?

*braces for tinfoil hat conspiracy theories which may arise as a result of this simple question*
#9 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**HAHA XD solarisofcelestia CHECK THIS OUT
User avatar #40 to #9 - solarisofcelestia (11/17/2015) [-]
Thanks.
#11 - aizeinstein (11/17/2015) [-]
**aizeinstein used "*roll picture*"**
**aizeinstein rolled image** What? They're gonna publish ISIS' unhumanly secrets? They're proud of that **** .
#13 to #11 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
i think they are mostly taking Down recruiting accounts or webpages or sumthing
#124 - derpingtonherp ONLINE (11/17/2015) [-]
**derpingtonherp used "*roll picture*"**
**derpingtonherp rolled image**What are they gonna do hack their nokia...
User avatar #109 - holycrapimacupcake (11/17/2015) [-]
>Vice
>actual journalism

Pick one.
#193 - jomgor (11/18/2015) [-]
You guys seem to pretty unanimously be thinking "what is anon ganna do to people living in caves?"
ISIS(ISIL) have websites, a magazine, twitter accounts ect... they may live in caves but to recruit more to their cause they make heavy use of the technology available to them. Less ISIS presence online will directly impact their recruiting efforts essentially blocking the river at its source.
#248 - robuntu (11/22/2015) [-]
I can totally see how anonymous could target companies, especially online companies. Or celebs. Or rich people.

But I don't see what they can do terrorists. Hack their throwaway Twitter accounts? I dunno....
#41 - demonicknighty (11/17/2015) [-]
That means they're in Paris since they have been quiet for so long
#45 to #41 - justtocomment (11/17/2015) [-]
They've been quiet because they're all ******* gone. Either turned on the others as informants, caught because of informants, or hiding so they don't end up in one of those two categories. Anonymous hasn't been a thing for years.
#38 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
This war lasted for more than 40 years, and you people talk only about ISIS, if it was only ISIS the issue would've been resolved in a jiffy, it way way complicated.
#26 - anon (11/17/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** 2014
[ 254 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)