Thanks science. Men are dogs!: www.crackedsorcerer.com/post/1549/Men-are-dogs. WHEN} dd: mats at realty liw. fend! n 'mall , the ; g: -an en the left has ' Dht  Thanks science Men are dogs!: www crackedsorcerer com/post/1549/Men-are-dogs WHEN} dd: mats at realty liw fend! n 'mall the ; g: -an en left has ' Dht
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (38)
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #2 - zarcos
Reply -67 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
This is how theist vs atheist debates work. One person wants to believe something ridiculous and stupid that makes them happy and someone tries to prove it wrong. The religious person then ignores the evidence presented because believing what they believe makes them happy.
#23 to #2 - leadstriker
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#20 to #2 - dissectedtesticle
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
haha, this guy.
haha, this guy.
#21 to #2 - TigerMann
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
User avatar #29 to #21 - zarcos
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
Why? Give me a reason why arguing about things bothers you so much, and why should I not do whatever I please?
User avatar #37 to #29 - TigerMann
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/31/2014) [-]
I saw red thumbs, something about a political argument, and thought to myself "it would probably be funny if I commented this image"

I don't ****** know mate, I have about 3 reaction images.
User avatar #38 to #37 - zarcos
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/31/2014) [-]
fair enough.
#19 to #2 - applesdontpee
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
User avatar #17 to #2 - YllekNayr
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
You're not really doing atheists any favors by posting **** like this.
User avatar #24 to #17 - zarcos
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
I'm not an atheist.
User avatar #33 to #24 - YllekNayr
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/31/2014) [-]
That's irrelevant.
User avatar #34 to #33 - zarcos
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/31/2014) [-]
Why would I care if I do atheists any favors if I'm not an atheist?
User avatar #35 to #34 - YllekNayr
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/31/2014) [-]
**** off
User avatar #36 to #35 - zarcos
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/31/2014) [-]
Why? because you're retarded?
User avatar #9 to #2 - drgilby
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
Yup. That is how ALL of those debates go down because ALL atheists and theists think THAT way and THAT way ALONE. Making alot of generalisations there, if YOU want to present an opinion and have that opinion respected you better support yourself and not make such broad generalisations of people
User avatar #7 to #2 - captainfuckitall
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
It's not a theist vs. atheist debate, it's a wise vs. unwise debate. I've met MANY people, Atheists included, who will absolutely refuse to accept something as fact even when evidence is thrown in their face, just because they don't want to believe it. Likewise I've met many Theists who do the exact opposite, and are completely willing to accept inconvenient truths if enough evidence is provided.
User avatar #25 to #7 - zarcos
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
But why does someone have to believe something even if it's true? Just because something is true doesn't mean people are better off accepting it as fact, just look at economics. In a fiat currency system the people's belief and faith in the value of the currency is what makes it valuable, even though it's just paper or a number on the computer.
User avatar #32 to #25 - captainfuckitall
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/31/2014) [-]
Well 1. Not believing something that's true only cripples people. However, there is a difference between 'objective' and 'subjective' things. Money is subjective, the value of something depends on whoever is looking at it; while colours are objective, they are the same to everyone who sees them (special circumstances aside).

2. Using that same logic, it's okay to believe things that AREN'T true; which makes the whole "Atheism V.S. Theism" debate null, because both sides are equal, regardless of what they believe.
User avatar #3 to #2 - mrblueftw
Reply +71 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
stop trying to start a ********* loser
User avatar #4 to #3 - zarcos
Reply -33 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
Not really trying to start a *********, just a debate. Why do you even care anyways? Just don't read it.
User avatar #5 to #4 - mrblueftw
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
your a blue name. you should know debating religion doesn't really work out here.
User avatar #6 to #5 - zarcos
Reply -31 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
It actually works fairly well in my experience. And once again, why are you concerning yourself with this? You can literally just move on and avoid any discomfort or annoyance a "*********" might cause you.
User avatar #11 to #6 - crimsonsunshine
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
all of your "arguments" boil down to "Why are you commenting on my comment?".
#13 to #11 - howaminotdeadyet
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
YFW you realize he got an argument from you
#18 to #13 - captainrattrap
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
Table for *********?
User avatar #27 to #11 - zarcos
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
Yes, and I think it's a good question to ask, why are you arguing with me about how I shouldn't start arguments?
User avatar #28 to #27 - crimsonsunshine
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
fk u fggit
User avatar #30 to #28 - zarcos
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/31/2014) [-]
orly?
User avatar #31 to #30 - crimsonsunshine
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/31/2014) [-]
yarlly.
#22 to #6 - niggashrimp
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
"And once again, why are you concerning yourself with this? You can literally just move on and avoid any discomfort or annoyance a "*********" might cause you. "

"Why do you even care anyways? Just don't read it. "

These translate to

"Please stop making me look like a faggot"
User avatar #26 to #22 - zarcos
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
I think the cocksucking I do makes me look more like a faggot, but that's just me. If I want to have an intelligent or unintelligent if I feel like it debate why should anyone but the people involved care about what I choose to waste my time doing?
#8 - sandwichchaser
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
Now he's a long fox
#1 - applescryatnight
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
how the hell do i know its not just a fox with a minimum of 7 legs?
User avatar #12 to #1 - finblob
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
Foxes don't contain enough Carbon Dioxide to harbour 7 legs, only 8. If they had 7 they'd have too much Carbon Dioxide and they'd explode.
Trust me, I am a science fox.
#14 to #12 - pyromanicturtlez
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
First they don't have enough, then they have too much?? MAKE UP YOUR ******* MIND SCIENCE FOX
User avatar #16 to #14 - finblob
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
Don't yell at science fox, it can cause us to explode.
#10 - anon id: edceb185
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
It's clearly a foxipede.
#15 - justinacase
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/30/2014) [-]
After a while I've come to the conclusion that this may in fact be two. Two Spiders.