Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(47):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 47 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
43 comments displayed.
#17 - solarisofcelestia (11/20/2015) [-]
And here's their new play-room.
#31 - sandmantaxman (11/20/2015) [-]
Babies need to toughen up
#1 - kalvissh (11/19/2015) [-]
#47 to #1 - twentyseconds (11/20/2015) [-]
no... its tears as in crying tears.

Some knock off brands might be claiming to be to no more "rip tears"
User avatar #6 to #1 - Garblestickleshlop (11/19/2015) [-]
It means no (crying)tears because they won't cry from the pain of brushing tangled hair.
User avatar #11 to #6 - tenfinnvo ONLINE (11/20/2015) [-]
What? That isn't painful. These kinds of shampoo don't make your eyes burn if you get it on your eyes.
User avatar #21 to #11 - twiceasfun (11/20/2015) [-]
I have some ******* curly ass hair that can hurt to brush out. I'm not gonna cry about it, but a child might. The hair on my head can hurt sometimes too
User avatar #26 to #11 - Garblestickleshlop (11/20/2015) [-]
The Loreal No Tears shampoo is not made to be sensitive on the eyes, it's for de-tangling. If you are a little kid with long hair, chances are you are going to cry from someone ripping out your hair with a hair brush. The Johnson & Johnson No More Tears shampoo is for babies that don't understand that they need to close their eyes, and is for preventing burning eyes.
#16 to #1 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
Nah, it's mostly just because it's watered down, so it burns, but not as bad if you get it in your eyes.

You'd still have to be retarded to squirt anything in your eyes unless you're explicitly told by a professional that you can do it, like with medicated eye drops or something.
User avatar #37 to #1 - deansg (11/20/2015) [-]
"See How the NO MORE TEARS® Seal Is More Than a Symbol on a Bottle
JOHNSON'S® NO MORE TEARS® Formula turned shampooing from a job into a joy and transformed bath time into playtime. It tells nurses that the product is formulated for ocular safety and tells mothers that the product is gentle, safe, and mild for their babies’ developing skin and eyes. Each product that carries this seal has passed rigorous and comprehensive evaluations to ensure its mildness in case of accidental splashes."
Just saying.
#2 to #1 - anon (11/19/2015) [-]
It usually does mean no tears though the crying kind
User avatar #24 to #1 - phudgepacker (11/20/2015) [-]
Literally just google "no tears shampoo" and click the first link taking you to the company website of that shampoo bottle in the tumblr post and you will see that yes indeed it does mean 'no tears' as in no crying because it is extra sensitive
User avatar #5 to #1 - huszti (11/19/2015) [-]
lmgtfy.com/?q=%22languages+other+than+english%22

German: media.wark24.de/Artikelbilder/800px/2xPenaten-Bad-und-Shampoo-400ml.jpg "no [crying] tears" <---there's no other translation for "Träne"
Spanish: cdn.eldeforma.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Shampoo-copy.jpeg "no [crying] tears" <---no other translation for "lágrima"
Italian: www.chicco.it/images/8059147053082/shampoo_200ml_1_jpg/full.jpg "no [crying] tears" <--no other translation for "lacrime"

i wish people would just fact check instead of just taking something as a fact just because some random guy on the internet posted something
#7 to #5 - caette ONLINE (11/19/2015) [-]
I always take everything I read on tumblr with a grain of salt
#14 to #7 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
>just tumblr
I hate to say it, but we aren't a whole lot better.
And most of 4chan is even worse, except they admit it.
User avatar #10 to #1 - lulusaurus (11/20/2015) [-]
L'Oréal Kids Shampoo debut commercial (1997)
I have traveled through time and came back to the future to tell you to shut the **** up.
#12 - asasqw (11/20/2015) [-]
Going to get a lot of use out of this one
#23 - terranrollerskates (11/20/2015) [-]
Look what you made me do.
#45 to #23 - crixuz [OP](11/20/2015) [-]
#43 - matthlord (11/20/2015) [-]
Oh good, a new shampoo for university students.
#46 - krayon (11/20/2015) [-]
It Worked.
#30 - fantasticfox ONLINE (11/20/2015) [-]
User avatar #29 - klick (11/20/2015) [-]
In theory that could work. Babies cry at everything because any amount of discomfort they feel is literally the worst pain they've ever felt in their life. So...eye stab them a few times and they should get the **** over that damp diaper
#18 - nathster (11/20/2015) [-]
**nathster used "*roll picture*"**
**nathster rolled image**
#44 - Jeff C (11/20/2015) [-]
But why are they using a picture of modern college students?
#40 - chaosraptor (11/20/2015) [-]
people when
#38 - tyrson (11/20/2015) [-]
Is it &quot;tears&quot; as in the liquid dripping from the eyes, or &quot;tears&quot; as in something you do with a piece of paper?   
Because I've seen bottles that say &quot;No tangles. No mess. No tears.&quot; and that's a little bit vague.
Is it "tears" as in the liquid dripping from the eyes, or "tears" as in something you do with a piece of paper?
Because I've seen bottles that say "No tangles. No mess. No tears." and that's a little bit vague.
User avatar #39 to #38 - bendeman ONLINE (11/20/2015) [-]
the latter
User avatar #41 to #38 - cormy (11/20/2015) [-]
It's always the liquid from your eyes.
User avatar #15 - nyrintriball (11/20/2015) [-]
So if you smack a child with a bottle of Johnson's No More Tears shampoo, does it create beautiful irony?
#22 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image** ur stt
User avatar #9 - thedecodedgamer (11/19/2015) [-]
This is why homophones can be dangerous
#20 to #9 - anon (11/20/2015) [-]
Homonyms
Homophones sound the same, red read. Real reel etc.
User avatar #33 to #20 - emiyashirou ONLINE (11/20/2015) [-]
Real and reel aren't homophones, mate.
User avatar #42 - elcreepo (11/20/2015) [-]
When Johnson and Johnson came out with "no more tears" they meant that it wouldn't make a kid's hair dry and unmanageable, causing it to tear when it was brushed

It was meant for detangling not for preventing crying
[ 47 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)