Upload
Login or register
x

Stealing Land

Sarah Silverman .' 1: 3: at Follow
Happy stealing life & land from a people
who only ever knew how to share Day!
RETWEETS FACC) R ITES
zen gem 'lolkill" lyiat
2: 34 PM - 28 Nov 2013
if' (ti) Is it Hannukah already? #
...
+704
Views: 27866
Favorited: 34
Submitted: 12/26/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to nanako

Comments(109):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
[ 109 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
93 comments displayed.
User avatar #6 - mcmonsterkitty (12/27/2015) [-]
I find it especially hilarious that people think Native Americans were nothing but peace loving hippies, when tribes literally slaughtered and raped each other for not worshipping the right sky spirit, and took each other as slaves. They were doing exactly what white Europeans did on a smaller scale.
#43 to #6 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Huh, cuz I don't remember Native Americans dragging off other people and forcibly assimilating them while beating the culture out of them. You can say all you want about them being savage, but look up the Residential Schools in Canada where locking kids in rooms where other kids had tuberculosis was a "fair" form of detention. Hell, the Canadians were supposed to be "superior" yet they acted even more barbaric.
User avatar #52 to #43 - asotil (12/27/2015) [-]
Oh man you are not ready to learn about the Iroquois and Kiowa then
#65 to #52 - atomicjojo (12/27/2015) [-]
or the Sioux... or like half the tribes.
User avatar #72 to #65 - asotil (12/27/2015) [-]
>Half

And Thanksgiving was only kind of about "Here's what we'll pay for your land"
#70 to #43 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Native Americans had plenty of slaves and such. You really don't know much about history, do you? You will find the ugly and detestable anywhere and everywhere you look, including the Native Americans. Ever heard of grief wars, for instance?
#66 to #43 - locke (12/27/2015) [-]
"Huh, cuz I don't remember Native Americans dragging off other people and forcibly assimilating them while beating the culture out of them"

Yeah but not everyone can be Native Africans, making slaves to trade to Europeans for weapons.
#87 to #66 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
The fun part is. There where some tribes who willingly surrendered their own culture to become more european like. But found no acception with the europan immigrants because of the hostilites of the warrior tribes.
Ironicly enough nearly every tribe that became more like the europeans , in both culture and religion , where the more peacefull tribes.

But hey the proto americunts where all babaric monsters who came slaughering and raping into the country.
And where totally not considered pussys by the warrior tribes because they had no habbit of constant fighting to prove their manlyness.
#107 to #87 - anon (12/28/2015) [-]
sounds like argentina
User avatar #97 to #6 - waacson (12/27/2015) [-]
Their genocide was fully justified.
#59 to #6 - zmranger (12/27/2015) [-]
Not to be a dick or anything...Pls, dont thumb me down after reading this, but... a random thought: Maybe people are thumbing you up not because they actually know whether or not what you said is actually true, but rather because they would like it to be true so they would be knowing something other people dont. But they still dont know **** .
I can already hear the lyncing mob nearing this post...
#86 to #6 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Most interesting is their concept of manhood. Because for most of thouse nativ tribes a man was someone who basicly lives to fight and hunt.
And since the European wanted a more peacefull live they were not considered men by them and lead to hostilite.
Things began to escalate when the war for independance started and many of the nativ warrior tribes joined forces with the brit for the simple reason that they seemed be more manly than the proto americans. So both britbongs and nativs fought against the americunts and after the americunts won they ensuered their victory over the nativs.
And the biggest ironie is that these faggy little hipster lefties are the ones today who are thinking the concept of manhood is a bad thing and are talking all this **** about the peacefull , natur loving nativs. While they would be first who would have been killed by them for them simply not being manly
User avatar #36 to #6 - cheeseboyofdoom (12/27/2015) [-]
Everyone does that really.
#8 to #6 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
"No man can 'own' land, but merely become its caretaker for a while... Hey, those are OUR hunting grounds! Kill 'em!"
#71 to #8 - skebaba ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
That wasn't why they attacked. It was a cultural **** up, that's all. In their culture, nobody owns the land. They are given permission to SHARE the land with the inhabitants. Of course, that's not how it worked in European culture.
User avatar #76 to #71 - motorwaffle (12/27/2015) [-]
Didn't work too well in their culture either. Native American tribes killed each other over hunting ground ALL the time.
#77 to #76 - skebaba ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
Yeah. But I bet the people getting killed never asked for permission from the inhabitants to use the common hunting grounds.
#7 to #6 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
How dare you say that against the peaceful tribes of the ancient Americans!
People, strap him down. He's in need of a change of heart!
#29 - europe (12/27/2015) [-]
>native Americans
>sharing

They sure liked to share their arrows and axes with other tribes, alright
User avatar #75 to #29 - teseus (12/27/2015) [-]
Unlike the Europeans that hated that idea and instead shared bullets and cannon balls with each other.
User avatar #81 to #75 - europe (12/27/2015) [-]
We're not pretending that Europeans weren't warlike.
#4 - fazbear (12/27/2015) [-]
I never understood the whole collective whining about the whole losing land by force thing.
Everyone had their **** taken from them in those days, it's how things grew. Tough **** if you weren't strong enough to hold your own.
#68 to #4 - ninjaflapjack (12/27/2015) [-]
Maybe because we don't like the previous example of ethnic cleansing with how jews protested against it post war after being subjected to it n **** .
#94 to #4 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
It has more to do with how things played out for the indians after they were no longer free to move. alcoholism , depression and suicide rates are relatively high in the reservations they were moved to. It is a sad thing the two cultures couldn't exist together because the tribes were full with fascinating folklore and myths.

It basicly boils down to the atrocious manifest destiny. "Your god(s) gave you this land but my god promised it to me, and welll... I have guns. "

And on the whole thanksgiving thing, all holidays are retarded.

Yes a significant part of the tribes died before colonisation begun.
#12 to #4 - bronywiseman (12/27/2015) [-]
Yeah, and everyone had their foreskins cut off, and lived to 40 at best.
That doesn't mean it's a good thing.
#13 to #12 - fazbear (12/27/2015) [-]
Never said it was a good thing.
I just thought it was dumb how far people take it when it comes to Native Americans. They weren't the only people who had their **** taken from them, other types of people suffered the same **** .
User avatar #40 to #13 - uglychino (12/27/2015) [-]
How often do you see Indians ************ . The other countries that get taken over don't have genocide committed to them too with starvation, diseases, and bullets. We have to remind people again and again cause white people will do it again and again.
#44 to #40 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
maybe others should stop being inferior if they don't want to get wiped out
User avatar #46 to #44 - uglychino (12/27/2015) [-]
The only reason you're not getting ****** , pillaged, and your mom getting the salami roll is that you live in a safe little cycle. A little circle you'll never want to leave or escape.
#48 to #46 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Well yeah, white communities tend to be civil enough to avoid that stuff.
User avatar #50 to #48 - uglychino (12/27/2015) [-]
yeah, "civil". I guess it's civil when you're holding the fire hose, when you have the chains on black throats, when you drop two bombs on other countries, when you invade three other countries cause two buildings I watched fall. Whites are pretty evil man. They're the only race that ****** every race on every continent. I'm pretty sure history is pretty great for whites when all they do is slaughter and steal.
#58 to #50 - manofiron ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
Yes, because white people are the only ethnic group capable of committing atrocities. Get real. I'm not saying that what we did in the past is alright, it's not, it was horrible. I'm simply saying that you can't point fingers at only white people, saying that "Oh, white people are the evilest people ever." while pretending that other ethnic groups didn't do things just as bad, if not worse. It's not just whites that "slaughter and steal" that's always been human nature, but we're getting better. Still have a long way to go, mind you, but we've come a long way, nonetheless.
#67 to #58 - skebaba ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
Anyway. Every race would had done EXACTLY THE SAME THING, given chance. It just so happened that white people had that chance.
#51 to #50 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Every race ****** as many people as they could. Whites just happen to be better than everyone else at it. Your precious Indians were slaughtering each other's villages for fun long before they ever met a white person. White people were just better at it than them, and today we have electricity. You're welcome.
User avatar #56 to #51 - reeeeeeeeeee (12/27/2015) [-]
Holy **** the both of you are dumb shut the **** up retards
#88 to #50 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
What a dumb ******* sack of **** . Do you know about the Otoman Empire? What about Genghis Khan? What about ******* ISIS? Evil individuals are evil regardless of race or religion, you stupid faggot.
User avatar #103 to #88 - uglychino (12/27/2015) [-]
At every corner whites have done the wrong thing. Genghis Khan is one example from his race and the last. Isis is a necessary evil and its a recent example and Whites, Blacks, Orientals want to join Isis cause It's a idea from religion, you stupid bitch. ISIS Exist because of white oppression in the Middle East. Even the U.S gov admits ISIS is a result from the war a war whites started. I'm White too you ***** heads and I'm saying my race are assholes everywhere.
#14 to #13 - bronywiseman (12/27/2015) [-]
Well, those people's attackers aren't celebrated annually.
User avatar #15 to #14 - dndxplain ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
Collumbus day.
#38 to #15 - revelent (12/27/2015) [-]
I mean, I get where you're coming from, but Columbus was not an attacker. Hell I don't think he ever even had a part in the conquest itself.
User avatar #41 to #38 - uglychino (12/27/2015) [-]
His children took over the islands they discovered and started corrupting and raping everything that's why there's Puerto Ricans and no more Taino Indians.
#16 to #15 - bronywiseman (12/27/2015) [-]
Yeah... I know. That's kinda what we're talking about here.
I mean okay so the above post is probably about Thanksgiving, but Freddy here is talking about native Americans and how other people had their stuff taken from them, so...
I guess what I mean is that while the post isn't about Columbus day, that's what I was referencing.
User avatar #17 to #16 - dndxplain ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
the pilgrims are also, you know, responsible for the slaughter of the native americans.

basically everyone but the french, actually.
#19 to #12 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Yeh but it was just reality back then. As it turns out, the past can't be changed and moping about doesn't do jack
#20 to #19 - bronywiseman (12/27/2015) [-]
GIF
And?
It was a reality, yes. My point still stands. Just because something was common, that doesn't mean it's right.
Moping doesn't do anything, no. But looking back and examining does.
Every day, we are finding extra planets, and new ways of exploring them.
If we are going to be meeting other cognitive, self-aware species, we need to examine the past to ensure that we don't repeat it.
#21 to #20 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Trying to have a serious discussion while attaching images from a cartoon to your statements is kind of counterproductive. It's fine for normal, lighthearted conversations, but using reaction images when you're supposedly talking about something serious only indicates that you really aren't taking it seriously.

Brush this off as pony hate if you will, but it isn't. I've nothing against most bronies, but a cartoon horse is not relevant to a discussion of genocide and frankly I find it somewhat insulting to the memories of the dead
User avatar #23 to #21 - bronywiseman (12/27/2015) [-]
So posting a picture of a cartoon horse while talking about a people that were hideously murdered is disrespectful, but having an entire holiday dedicated to the murderer of those people is fine?
#39 to #23 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
I said literally nothing about my opinion of whether or not Thanksgiving is fine, so good job trying to shove words in my mouth, buddy. However, since you brought it up, I do think Thanksgiving is fine. Not because I think what we did to the Natives is cool, but because the thing you and every other dumbass that pisses and moans about Thanksgiving being a murder holiday choose to ignore is that Thanksgiving is not a celebration of the pilgrims taking land from the Native Americans. It is, and always has been, a celebration of a good harvest. Nothing more, nothing less. "Thanksgiving days" were celebrated before the first pilgrims set foot on American soil, and if you bothered to do even the most basic research, you would realize that there is nothing in the origin of Thanksgiving that has to do with stealing anyone's land.

You and Silverman are both idiots of the highest calibre. Only a complete fool or a sociopath would ever think that millions of humans would celebrate a holiday based around murder. You just like to bitch because you get off on white guilt.
#42 to #39 - onerace (12/27/2015) [-]
Yay anons like really this guy doesn't know what he's talking about
#30 to #23 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Yes
User avatar #83 to #20 - brobyddark (12/27/2015) [-]
Pretty much everyone's point is that, while it wasn't right, bitching about it when things certainly have changed and turning a family holiday about being thankful into a hatefest for the "evil whites" is a pretty **** thing to do.
#62 to #12 - galanorth ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
Actually, people still lived to be old. The reason why the average life expectancy was so low was because of infant moralities. If you are going to talk crap about a bygone era, at least be factual.
#69 to #62 - skebaba ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
AS long as you were rich enough. Try tell that to a homeless person of 1000 CE
User avatar #26 to #4 - salihzzz (12/27/2015) [-]
The world loves conquerors, a great man leading an army of brave men to take what they want for themselves betting their life for glory and riches for their people.

Israel on the other hand was given that land and defended it trough help from other nations and allying with supposed enemies, they never proclaimed to be conquerors they claim to be the victims, while litteraly everything was given to them. they whine about injustice abroad when their nation is built upon it.

So yes conquest to power is respected
conquest trought thievery is not
#31 to #4 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Its not the fact that palestine lost land by force.
Its more about how israel is still trying to expand, is constantly killing civilians while whining whenever the palestinians do as much as throw a rock at them to try to fight back, how they screw over local air space, and many other.

Not to mention how if it weren't jews doing this and if it were, lets say, russia or greece or romania or anyone else other than a nation of jews or the united states thanks to their propaganda network and relation to the west ******* over a neighboring nation, people would downright lose their **** so hard.

Also how the kikes keep up the GODS CHOSEN PEOPLE GOY IT WAS OUR LAND ALL THE TIME WE WERE CHASED OFF YES YES, act is really pissing people off.
User avatar #34 to #4 - mennopauze (12/27/2015) [-]
That's probably the dumbest thing I read all day. Time to bring back slavery because they used to do it all across history, right?
#49 to #4 - kingpongthedon (12/27/2015) [-]
1. It's still how we do things. That would be why the Israel/Palestine conflict is being referenced, albeit mockingly. But we could say the same thing for what's going on in the Ukraine. For greater examples, look at the European land-grabs throughout the first half of the 20th Century.

2. It's still a ****** thing to do. Just because it happened a long time ago and arguably made the world a better place doesn't change the fact that it sucked for the people living there beforehand. Even though the Vikings set the course of Europe from about 800 AD on, they're still widely regarded as assholes. Sure, we celebrate a select few but we certainly don't condone the overall rape-and-pillage mindset they had.
User avatar #78 to #4 - yumyumtittysucker (12/27/2015) [-]
Nothing in history should be forgotten, no matter how terrible it may be, but to celebrate it is a different matter.
#32 to #4 - hongkonglongdong (12/27/2015) [-]
If everyone is murdering everyone else, that doesn't make murder okay.
#11 - lonelybaloney (12/27/2015) [-]
Brown Guy takes over White Guy's land, filler history.
White Guy takes over Brown Guy's land, MUH OPPRESSION.
#1 - thismustbeseen (12/27/2015) [-]
My respect for Sarah Silverman extends to being an extra on Star Trek: Voyager, and once doing a photoshoot on rollerskates, because I have a fetish for that.

That's about it.
User avatar #2 to #1 - theroflcer (12/27/2015) [-]
That's not really a 'I am ready for you rage' moment.
Most people I've come across seem to hate the actual person of Sarah Silverman.
#3 to #1 - fuckyouto (12/27/2015) [-]
Man, you have a ****** fetish.
User avatar #37 to #3 - bluerangermartin (12/27/2015) [-]
but then id have to wear rollerskates
User avatar #10 to #3 - thismustbeseen (12/27/2015) [-]
Oh yeah? Well you have a ****** ... everything.
User avatar #28 - cykocd ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
I distinctly remember the indians selling thier land for shiny beads
#9 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
Let's remember that both of these are crude racial-inspired jokes that have no educational basis or rationality behind them, and are designed specifically to get a chuckle or rise out of you.   
   
That said, let's also remember Sarah Silverman has been supporting her sister's elections in the Meretz party, attempting to oust the MIC-supporting Israeli congress for years now, and is clearly not a supporter of Israel's aggressive foreign policies and questionable ethics.
Let's remember that both of these are crude racial-inspired jokes that have no educational basis or rationality behind them, and are designed specifically to get a chuckle or rise out of you.

That said, let's also remember Sarah Silverman has been supporting her sister's elections in the Meretz party, attempting to oust the MIC-supporting Israeli congress for years now, and is clearly not a supporter of Israel's aggressive foreign policies and questionable ethics.
User avatar #27 to #9 - egosumproxi ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
Wasn't aware the Israeli government had any ethics to question...
User avatar #90 to #27 - praemium (12/27/2015) [-]
lol get real, Israel is hell by Western standards, but literally better than all regional governments, except Lebanon and Jordan.
User avatar #109 to #90 - egosumproxi ONLINE (12/28/2015) [-]
My statement still stands. Doesn't matter if they're the best quality **** in the region, they're still **** .
#22 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
It's not the first part that's stupid, it's the "from people who only knew how to share" part that's ******* idiotic. If she thinks the Native Americans were all peaceful sharing and caring types, she needs a ******* history book
User avatar #61 to #22 - MikedelScorcho (12/27/2015) [-]
There was a fundamental difference in the way that the Europeans and the way that the Natives viewed land, the former believing that one could own land and once owned the resources of it belonged only to the owner, and the latter believing that ownership of land was impossible and that it was there for the franchise of anyone who needed it. So, according to history, there is truth to the idea that the natives shared and the Europeans did not, but the oversimplification of the issue and neglecting of the inclination towards warfare that most tribes had is moronic.
User avatar #5 - thebluedream (12/27/2015) [-]
It seems most celebs should be grateful they are blessed with talent because clearly most of them are ******* morons.
User avatar #18 to #5 - dndxplain ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
she wasn't saying anything wrong and/or stupid though?
User avatar #25 to #18 - cockassunited (12/27/2015) [-]
"People who only ever knew how to share"
#80 - leifbunny (12/27/2015) [-]
>Every society has hurt another society at some point, to the point of slavery, extinction, or worse
>warring nations were thriving nations back in our history before mass telecommunications were popularized.
>No it was not ok that they did those things centuries ago. But they did them. Live with it.
>You are not your ancestor. You aren't oppressed like they were.
>I am not my Ancestor. I am not oppressed as they were.
>We are an improvement as a species now than we were 100+ years ago.
>We still have a long way to go, with out own societal ills.
>let's stop whipping our own backs over our ancestor's choices.
>Sarah Silverman just wants attention, nothing new.

ok? ok.
User avatar #89 - mondominiman ONLINE (12/27/2015) [-]
Rabble rabble additional comment about indians rabble rabble
User avatar #85 - Deavas (12/27/2015) [-]
I never understood the whole Palestine thing

Some indigenous people live there, everything is barren, Jews get there, magic of irrigation turns it fertile, Muslims invade and take over, Christians liberate the holy land, Isreal becomes recognized as a state, Palestine is haven of Muslims who for some reason think they're entitled to it even though Jews got there first, of the three of them

Makes total sense
User avatar #91 to #85 - dikslapping (12/27/2015) [-]
It comes to the 2 sons of Abraham Ishmael and Isaac. They are arguing over who has the rights to claim the holy land. Ishmael was first born but was not from Abraham's wife Sarah so he and his mother, Sarah's maid Hagar, was shown the door. Isaac was the second born but he was a legit child. So Jews and Muslims argue who gets the dead guy's land.
User avatar #92 to #91 - Deavas (12/27/2015) [-]
Except both of them were Jews. It doesn't matter that one of them eventually became the ancester of muhammad, there was no Islam yet for hundreds more years. It's a stupid argument
User avatar #93 to #92 - dikslapping (12/27/2015) [-]
I know but that is what the fight is about.
#57 - tarabostes (12/27/2015) [-]
I'm stealing your land OP , watch out!
#63 - anon (12/27/2015) [-]
don't scroll down to the comments, just move on to the next picture
User avatar #35 - llpanic (12/27/2015) [-]
I was checking here twitter and she recieves so much hate It's a shame all the idiots that insult her have to call here "jewish bitch" because it's exactly the kind of thing that just makes their arguments stronger to the general popullation
#101 to #35 - scruffyguy (12/27/2015) [-]
>Sees people celebrating with their families; being thankful for what they've been given
>"I hate you guys!"

She IS a jewish bitch.
User avatar #24 - meowmeowman (12/27/2015) [-]
Might makes right, always has been, always will be. Complain all you like, won't change a thing.
User avatar #79 - kattbajs (12/27/2015) [-]
Both are 100% Retarded.
This is not funny. But it would fit in a crindge comp.
User avatar #82 to #79 - itssakamoto (12/27/2015) [-]
Your comment fits in a "crindge" comp
User avatar #106 - srskate (12/27/2015) [-]
Sarah Silverman is a comedian, I wouldn't be surprised if this tweet was comedy.
[ 109 comments ]
Leave a comment

Top Content in 24 Hours

No entries found.
 Friends (0)