Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(12):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Anonymous comments allowed.
12 comments displayed.
#3 - gjtz (12/08/2015) [-]
Click to show spoiler
I'm really hit and miss with Disturbed. I only like a handful of their songs, but this was pretty good. Different, both from Disturbed's usual and the Simon and Garfunkel's original, but still good.
User avatar #2 - ljxjlos (12/08/2015) [-]
Not gonna lie...it´s kinda **** . By itself and compared to the original...
#7 to #2 - auswooky (12/09/2015) [-]
I reckon this is more instrumental. Where the original was more about the vocals. both are good. I prefer the OG sound of silence though
User avatar #9 to #2 - europe (12/09/2015) [-]
I thought it was quite refreshing to hear David sing like this
User avatar #10 to #9 - ljxjlos (12/09/2015) [-]
To be honest I think all of their stuff is pure and utter **** , so there´s nothing "refreshing" for me - it could have been redeeming being a different style, but well...
#4 to #2 - anon (12/08/2015) [-]
Opinions man, I heared this one before the original and I think the original is sounds way ******** ..
User avatar #12 - ompalomper (12/09/2015) [-]
recently got new speakers
this on high volume with clearest sound i have had for years

not gonna lie, i may have popped a music boner
User avatar #11 - bulwark (12/09/2015) [-]
God, I ******* love Disturbed.

And I absolutely love their new album. It has shown that they aren't afraid of deviating from their usual style, while still keeping their well-known sound.
User avatar #8 - rockmanfan (12/09/2015) [-]
it's definitely different from the original, but hot damn i love this cover.
User avatar #6 - gittons (12/09/2015) [-]
feel like this would be better if his voice was more clear.
he is trying to push the deep voice too hard and it ends sounding..muffled? not as sharp.
but other than that it is a good cover.
User avatar #5 - ubercookieboy (12/08/2015) [-]
Doesn't sound very silent to me
0
#1 - ljxjlos has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)