Smash Me - DIY Pinata Girls
| |
Anonymous comments allowed.
124 comments displayed.
#12
-
Silver Quantum (08/22/2015) [-] jesus christ i'd smash the blonde one so hard, her ancestors would feel it
#6
-
CrimsonHazrad (08/22/2015) [-] 
9/10 would tie up and throw in my sex dungeon take on a lovely date to Olive Garden
#36
-
moobsmachine (08/22/2015) [-] **moobsmachine used "*roll picture*"**
**moobsmachine rolled image** I new Mexican abortion clinics were bad, but damn
**moobsmachine rolled image** I new Mexican abortion clinics were bad, but damn
#47
-
xAELiTe (08/22/2015) [-] Do I spy Madden in the background? I'll definitely smash them at that!
#4
-
anon (08/21/2015) [-]
Their fathers must be so proud. I bet they just love spending all that money on their "education."
#98 to #4
-
srskate (08/23/2015) [-] I think my favorite part of this whole thing is how this anon tried to go off on me for being a slutty woman
This is me. And I've only had sex with one woman, my girlfriend. I just don't have a problem with hookup culture.
before you ask, she's only had sex with me as well
This is me. And I've only had sex with one woman, my girlfriend. I just don't have a problem with hookup culture.
before you ask, she's only had sex with me as well
#15 to #14
-
srskate (08/22/2015) [-] But why?
We shouldn't blame people for wanting to have a lot of sex. Sex is pretty great! That's why hook up culture exists. It's one of the reason college is so amazing! It's honestly somewhat of a shame that we've taken this long to somewhat emerge from the sexual repression that's been going on in the last few centuries.
We shouldn't blame people for wanting to have a lot of sex. Sex is pretty great! That's why hook up culture exists. It's one of the reason college is so amazing! It's honestly somewhat of a shame that we've taken this long to somewhat emerge from the sexual repression that's been going on in the last few centuries.
#16 to #15
-
hirollin (08/22/2015) [-] That's just an opinion though.
Some will view it as shameful. It's also more of an American and European attitude, it's not nearly as prevalent in the world as you'd think. Hook up culture is very much a minority, and looked down upon by most of the world.
Hardly sexual repression though. That's just nonsense.
Some will view it as shameful. It's also more of an American and European attitude, it's not nearly as prevalent in the world as you'd think. Hook up culture is very much a minority, and looked down upon by most of the world.
Hardly sexual repression though. That's just nonsense.
#18 to #16
-
srskate (08/22/2015) [-] Lets hear your side then, why should someone be blamed for having sex?
and why isn't it repression to insist people have less sex as opposed to the amount of sex they'd like
and you'd be surprised how prevalent hookup culture is among college aged individuals. Even those that don't partake don't look down on it. And the youth of today is the future.
and why isn't it repression to insist people have less sex as opposed to the amount of sex they'd like
and you'd be surprised how prevalent hookup culture is among college aged individuals. Even those that don't partake don't look down on it. And the youth of today is the future.
#51 to #18
-
alarubra (08/22/2015) [-] Pounded pussy gets loose. It becomes more flappy, and less tight on my dick. I have no problem with slutty chicks in theory. I've been pretty ******* promiscuous. But, 90% of chicks have no idea how to use their pelvic muscles to tighten up during sex, which should happen in a rhythm, and only tighten when they orgasm. Virgins, or girls who've only had sex a few times, it's still naturally tight. What I don't care for is the fact that chicks think they're good at sex, because guys think they're hot and still chase after them even after a mediocre lay. When they're still new to it, they're more likely to listen to what you ask for because they're less likely to wrongly think they know what they're doing. In the entire time I've been sexually active, out of all the promiscuous girls I've ****** one was actually good at sex. Now, I'm still a pretty young guy, and I've mainly ****** in my own age range, it may get better with older chicks after post-pubescent hormones start dieing down and just looking good isn't enough anymore, so they actually have to learn what good sex should be like, but as it stands, girls that are relatively inexperienced and willing to learn what you want, or girls that have been in long committed sexual relationships, where they learned by practicing over and over with one partner are really much better at sex. Not slutty chicks
#81 to #18
-
anon (08/22/2015) [-] "...why isn't it repression to insist people have less sex as opposed to the amount of sex they'd like"
...because it is harmful to themselves and society so it's actually GOOD ADVICE FROM PEOPLE WHO KNOW MORE THAN YOU to wait and have all that crazy sex within a MARRIAGE.
"...you'd be surprised how prevalent hookup culture is among college aged individuals."
So your argument is "everybody's doing it?" Really? Are you 12?! That's all you need to know to determine whether or not something is healthy? You're such a ******* follower. Enjoy herpes and divorce!
"Even those that don't partake don't look down on it. And the youth of today is the future.
...and they are all idiots like you with zero life experience and no concept of the fact that what you want when you are 20 is VASTLY different from what you will want when you are 30, but there are things you can do in your 20's (like hooking up) that will DRASTICALLY affect the rest of your life. How can you be this stupid?
Close your nasty snatch, bitch.
...because it is harmful to themselves and society so it's actually GOOD ADVICE FROM PEOPLE WHO KNOW MORE THAN YOU to wait and have all that crazy sex within a MARRIAGE.
"...you'd be surprised how prevalent hookup culture is among college aged individuals."
So your argument is "everybody's doing it?" Really? Are you 12?! That's all you need to know to determine whether or not something is healthy? You're such a ******* follower. Enjoy herpes and divorce!
"Even those that don't partake don't look down on it. And the youth of today is the future.
...and they are all idiots like you with zero life experience and no concept of the fact that what you want when you are 20 is VASTLY different from what you will want when you are 30, but there are things you can do in your 20's (like hooking up) that will DRASTICALLY affect the rest of your life. How can you be this stupid?
Close your nasty snatch, bitch.
#116 to #111
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-]
Good. Then go. Or, you could read the top of the graph to see the studies involved. Nah, it's probably best to put your fingers in your ears, go "lalalalalalala," and pretend the data isn't accurate because it challenges your stupid, immature, and naive world-view.
#118 to #116
-
srskate (08/23/2015) [-] you could do the same if you like
after you chill
because you're just annoying right now.
so chill
www.jstor.org/stable/352992?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
after you chill
because you're just annoying right now.
so chill
www.jstor.org/stable/352992?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
#121 to #108
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-]
Yes. Like racism. That's exactly what I mean, and it's what we've been talking about for this whole thread. You know your winning when you play the race card and start being ridiculously obtuse!
The point I'm making, have been making, continue to make, and that you pretend you don't understand I am making is that THE CONSEQUENCES OF CASUAL SEX HAVEN'T CHANGED regardless of what a bunch of 20-year-olds think about other 20-years-olds having promiscuous sex. You echo chamber of retards hasn't changed anything, and it isn't any different than the 20-year-old retard echo chamber that's ALWAYS existed.
"Sex feels good. We should do it, and people who say we shouldn't are stupid and just don't get it. Our parents are old fashioned. They just don't know what the youth are into these days." -every college-aged know-it-all ever
The point I'm making, have been making, continue to make, and that you pretend you don't understand I am making is that THE CONSEQUENCES OF CASUAL SEX HAVEN'T CHANGED regardless of what a bunch of 20-year-olds think about other 20-years-olds having promiscuous sex. You echo chamber of retards hasn't changed anything, and it isn't any different than the 20-year-old retard echo chamber that's ALWAYS existed.
"Sex feels good. We should do it, and people who say we shouldn't are stupid and just don't get it. Our parents are old fashioned. They just don't know what the youth are into these days." -every college-aged know-it-all ever
#123 to #121
-
srskate (08/23/2015) [-] Well you're saying traditional values haven't changed, I'm saying they have. Sexual liberation has been occurring for years now. Interracial relationships are no longer a crime, gay relationships are no longer a crime, sodomy is no longer a crime, blow jobs are legal, we talk about sex. Things are different. Sometimes it just takes the older generation dying out for the change to happen.
#133 to #130
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-]
You're still pretending that the consequences of sexual liberation have changed? The out of wedlock birthrate and the results of single motherhood would like to disagree with you, but at least all the people you know think it's...like...no big deal, maaannn." Cute!
#134 to #133
-
srskate (08/23/2015) [-] At least our teen pregnancy has dropped.
and out of wedlock birth rates have risen, but it's not so straightforward. Part of the proposed reason for this is because a woman no longer needs to get married if she's pregnant.
www.brookings.edu/research/papers/1996/08/childrenfamilies-akerlof
and out of wedlock birth rates have risen, but it's not so straightforward. Part of the proposed reason for this is because a woman no longer needs to get married if she's pregnant.
www.brookings.edu/research/papers/1996/08/childrenfamilies-akerlof
#144 to #140
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-]
"...results of single motherhood..."
Still having a hard time reading, huh? So, are you going to address those consequences.
"they are twice as likely to drop out of high school, 2.5 times as likely to become teen mothers, and 1.4 times as likely to be idle -- out of school and out of work -- as children who grow up with both parents. Children in one-parent families also have lower grade point averages, lower college aspirations, and poorer attendance records. As adults, they have higher rates of divorce. These patterns persist even after adjusting for differences in race, parents' education, number of siblings, and residential location."
You can verify this yourself. I don't really care what you think about providing a source. **** yourself.
Still having a hard time reading, huh? So, are you going to address those consequences.
"they are twice as likely to drop out of high school, 2.5 times as likely to become teen mothers, and 1.4 times as likely to be idle -- out of school and out of work -- as children who grow up with both parents. Children in one-parent families also have lower grade point averages, lower college aspirations, and poorer attendance records. As adults, they have higher rates of divorce. These patterns persist even after adjusting for differences in race, parents' education, number of siblings, and residential location."
You can verify this yourself. I don't really care what you think about providing a source. **** yourself.
#142 to #139
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-] "Poverty is living."
Did this make sense in your head?
"...if you want to avoid poverty and join the middle class in the United States, you need to complete high school (at a minimum), work full time and marry before you have children.” As Haskins and Sawhill put it, “If you do all three, your chances of being poor fall from 12 percent to 2 percent, and your chances of joining the middle class or above rise from 56 to 74 percent."
"The percentage of births to unmarried mothers reached 40.6% in 2008, up from 18.4% in 1980. This figure continues to challenge anti-poverty efforts, and constitutes the weakest leg of the anti-poverty stool."
conhomeusa.typepad.com/platform/2011/04/tevi-troy-reality-poverty.html
You can dismiss what you want. I really don't care. I can tell by your tone how pissed you are though. This is really fun for me. I want you to know that I'm enjoying enraging you. I know you are furious, and I love it!
Did this make sense in your head?
"...if you want to avoid poverty and join the middle class in the United States, you need to complete high school (at a minimum), work full time and marry before you have children.” As Haskins and Sawhill put it, “If you do all three, your chances of being poor fall from 12 percent to 2 percent, and your chances of joining the middle class or above rise from 56 to 74 percent."
"The percentage of births to unmarried mothers reached 40.6% in 2008, up from 18.4% in 1980. This figure continues to challenge anti-poverty efforts, and constitutes the weakest leg of the anti-poverty stool."
conhomeusa.typepad.com/platform/2011/04/tevi-troy-reality-poverty.html
You can dismiss what you want. I really don't care. I can tell by your tone how pissed you are though. This is really fun for me. I want you to know that I'm enjoying enraging you. I know you are furious, and I love it!
#125 to #109
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-]
If all you got from >>#92 is that I'm older than you then you are either lying or to stupid and ignorant to talk about this because I'm 100% right. Everything you are saying is nothing new, and the results of your brand of idiocy are predictable. Again, it's almost like older people have seen this movie before over and over and know how it ends EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
You can pretend you don't get the graph or that you can't find the same information in study after study over and over, but I've got some bad news for you...
You can pretend you don't get the graph or that you can't find the same information in study after study over and over, but I've got some bad news for you...
#135 to #132
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-]
You're a small little insecure faggot, huh?
"Someday I'm going to be a civil engineer! You'll see! Then you will all have to respect me! All of you! What are you laughing at?! Stop it! I'm going to be important! I am! I'm going to start at $45k/yr! Beat that! Stop laughing! I'm going to own a quarter of a million dollar home someday. WAaaaaaaaaaaHHHHH!"
Stick your baby calculus and baby circuits and baby dynamics and baby this and baby that and shove it up your whiny insecure butt. Civil engineers aren't real engineers.
"Someday I'm going to be a civil engineer! You'll see! Then you will all have to respect me! All of you! What are you laughing at?! Stop it! I'm going to be important! I am! I'm going to start at $45k/yr! Beat that! Stop laughing! I'm going to own a quarter of a million dollar home someday. WAaaaaaaaaaaHHHHH!"
Stick your baby calculus and baby circuits and baby dynamics and baby this and baby that and shove it up your whiny insecure butt. Civil engineers aren't real engineers.
#20 to #17
-
hirollin (08/22/2015) [-] That's an even worse word. You can dislike a person or behavior without judging them. You don't want to date someone who drink 4 beers a day, suddenly you're judging them for likeing alcohol, no that's preposterous. You are simply not attracted to that kind of person.
Teenagers and youths think that any sort of disaproval is a big bad thing called "judging" who are the parents to judge the kids of today? Well they are your parents, the adults, the people who have obviously already lived through it. They know the pros and the cons that the youths can't possibly know.
Maybe it desintized them, maybe it got them an std, maybe they got severe mental and emotion problems, conflict with religion, rape, the list goes on and on and on.
Disapproving is not judging, everyone understands that kids are horny. It doesn't mean they should act without thinking on sexual actions, which lets be honest most of the time is the case.
As for the "why wouldn't a person want to date someone who has had multiple partners?" question. A timeless penis' in soda example is just fine. It goes both ways, a lot of girls don't want a guy whose had multiple partners. A reason? They are just another number.
There are many reasons for it, and many reasons against it. It all boils down to preference. It is completely understandable that a man wouldn't want the mother of his children to have presented herself in such a fashion as the one displayed in the picture.
Teenagers and youths think that any sort of disaproval is a big bad thing called "judging" who are the parents to judge the kids of today? Well they are your parents, the adults, the people who have obviously already lived through it. They know the pros and the cons that the youths can't possibly know.
Maybe it desintized them, maybe it got them an std, maybe they got severe mental and emotion problems, conflict with religion, rape, the list goes on and on and on.
Disapproving is not judging, everyone understands that kids are horny. It doesn't mean they should act without thinking on sexual actions, which lets be honest most of the time is the case.
As for the "why wouldn't a person want to date someone who has had multiple partners?" question. A timeless penis' in soda example is just fine. It goes both ways, a lot of girls don't want a guy whose had multiple partners. A reason? They are just another number.
There are many reasons for it, and many reasons against it. It all boils down to preference. It is completely understandable that a man wouldn't want the mother of his children to have presented herself in such a fashion as the one displayed in the picture.
#22 to #20
-
srskate (08/22/2015) [-] www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/judge
You need a refresher course on this word bruh.
and I guess what I really should be arguing is that partner preference is a wholly different matter from the type of judgement placed by anon. I agree, there isn't anything inherently wrong with wanting a partner that is not promiscuous. You can't always help what you're attracted to, although I would create a distinction between promiscuity and drinking 4 beers a day. Drinking, especially of that magnitude, is unhealthy in and of itself, while promiscuity is not.
Some of your conclusions though, are off. It would not be sound to argue that someone has severe mental and emotional problems/conflict with religion/rape etc solely because that individual enjoys casual sex. On a sidenote: rape has been shown to have a myriad of responses in terms of sexual activity. Some people become disgusted with sex following such a traumatic experience, while others have more sex as a way of "regaining control," but honestly this is wholly irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
What I am saying here, though, is that one should not place judgement or exhibit contempt (as anon has) based on someone's proclivity for sex. When it comes down to it, sex is just an emotionally charged hobby. I mean, I can judge someone for stamp collecting, but what good does it do me?
You need a refresher course on this word bruh.
and I guess what I really should be arguing is that partner preference is a wholly different matter from the type of judgement placed by anon. I agree, there isn't anything inherently wrong with wanting a partner that is not promiscuous. You can't always help what you're attracted to, although I would create a distinction between promiscuity and drinking 4 beers a day. Drinking, especially of that magnitude, is unhealthy in and of itself, while promiscuity is not.
Some of your conclusions though, are off. It would not be sound to argue that someone has severe mental and emotional problems/conflict with religion/rape etc solely because that individual enjoys casual sex. On a sidenote: rape has been shown to have a myriad of responses in terms of sexual activity. Some people become disgusted with sex following such a traumatic experience, while others have more sex as a way of "regaining control," but honestly this is wholly irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
What I am saying here, though, is that one should not place judgement or exhibit contempt (as anon has) based on someone's proclivity for sex. When it comes down to it, sex is just an emotionally charged hobby. I mean, I can judge someone for stamp collecting, but what good does it do me?
#23 to #22
-
hirollin (08/22/2015) [-] I know of many people who regularly had casual sex in their younger years and regretted it in the future which caused mental and relationship issues. Seems to be common from what I have seen. We have yet to see the aftermath of a widespread unregulated hook-up culture. I look forward to seeing the results. Fact of the matter is none of this can be measured, as it does boil down to preference.
I see no reason why one shouldn't exhibit contempt for someone who regularly has sex. People show contempt for a lot less. If you know they are having a lot of sex, somewhere along the line the person failed to keep it private, which is a failure enough in itself. If you are vocal about your sexual adventures and get mad at ridicule or backlash you brought it on yourself.
I see no reason why one shouldn't exhibit contempt for someone who regularly has sex. People show contempt for a lot less. If you know they are having a lot of sex, somewhere along the line the person failed to keep it private, which is a failure enough in itself. If you are vocal about your sexual adventures and get mad at ridicule or backlash you brought it on yourself.
#24 to #23
-
srskate (08/22/2015) [-] I'd call out your anecdotal evidence, but I've been using quite a bit myself. Suffice to say, knowing a few people isn't really a definitive sample. For one, it suffers from sampling bias (you wouldn't hear about the people it worked out for) and two it's confirmation bias.
People showing contempt for less isn't justification, it's another problem to be solved. The problem I see with people showing contempt is that is breeds hostility and hatred, which is utterly pointless for this matter. Secondly, not keeping your sex life private is something else that is not a fault. Now, one shouldn't necessarily go telling everyone they meet, but only because most people wouldn't give a **** . But sex need not be some hush hush event. The fact of the matter is if you have sex, someone other than the parties involved will likely know about it. Your roommates, your friends you went to the party with, they'll all know easily.
That last line of yours is highly concerning. It's reminiscent of what some people said following the Charlie Hebdo attacks. Someone knowing of an activity you do that harms no one shouldn't bring about backlash.
People showing contempt for less isn't justification, it's another problem to be solved. The problem I see with people showing contempt is that is breeds hostility and hatred, which is utterly pointless for this matter. Secondly, not keeping your sex life private is something else that is not a fault. Now, one shouldn't necessarily go telling everyone they meet, but only because most people wouldn't give a **** . But sex need not be some hush hush event. The fact of the matter is if you have sex, someone other than the parties involved will likely know about it. Your roommates, your friends you went to the party with, they'll all know easily.
That last line of yours is highly concerning. It's reminiscent of what some people said following the Charlie Hebdo attacks. Someone knowing of an activity you do that harms no one shouldn't bring about backlash.
#25 to #24
-
hirollin (08/22/2015) [-] Differences in thinking, neither are right nor wrong. They simply are. There is no need for reeducation on either side, despite both thinking the same. There will always be conflict, there will always be some that approve wholeheartedly, and disapprove wholeheartedly. It's also a matter of opinion whether or not sex should be hush hush or not, and ultimately up to the couple. Changes nothing however, if it gets out. They are still going to be scrutinized by some, and they should be prepared for that. They can always choose not to have sex near their room mates, they are not controlled by their genitals after all, they do it for convenience, which again leads back to the scrutinization.
Please, comparing this to attack logic is ridiculous. One isn't a communist just because he/she thinks sharing is pretty damn great.
Harming no one? We don't have a 100% method of birth control yet. There is always a chance someone could get harmed. Be it the baby or the parents. Besides, i'm not convinced that hooking up can occur without any form of feelings being developed. I especially don't think this can happen on a long term scale with the majority of those hooking up, there has to be some residual mental effects. It would be irresponsible to assume there isn't.
However, it's not as if it's just an illogical hatred of those who have sex. The people who dislike it being vocal have their reasons.
Please, comparing this to attack logic is ridiculous. One isn't a communist just because he/she thinks sharing is pretty damn great.
Harming no one? We don't have a 100% method of birth control yet. There is always a chance someone could get harmed. Be it the baby or the parents. Besides, i'm not convinced that hooking up can occur without any form of feelings being developed. I especially don't think this can happen on a long term scale with the majority of those hooking up, there has to be some residual mental effects. It would be irresponsible to assume there isn't.
However, it's not as if it's just an illogical hatred of those who have sex. The people who dislike it being vocal have their reasons.
#26 to #24
-
hirollin (08/22/2015) [-] Ultimately though, anon referred to the father.
As a father or a mother it doesn't matter, would you be ok with your daughter having gratuitous amounts of sex with multiple men whenever she herself chose?
Or would you prefer your daughter or your son to wait to find one person he/she loves and spends the rest of his/her life with and have sex with that person.
It's easy for me, i'd choose the latter. And if I choose the latter, why should I act as the preference I wouldn't have as a parent as an example for my behavior now. That would be hypocritical. But if you can honestly say you would be fully supportive of your daughter having sex with multiple men, in fact helping to pay large sums of money to ease that for convenience, then I guess I wouldn't know how to continue.
I think ultimately, deep down, the majority of the population would prefer the latter, which may offer another reason why people look down it. True love and all that jargon.
As a father or a mother it doesn't matter, would you be ok with your daughter having gratuitous amounts of sex with multiple men whenever she herself chose?
Or would you prefer your daughter or your son to wait to find one person he/she loves and spends the rest of his/her life with and have sex with that person.
It's easy for me, i'd choose the latter. And if I choose the latter, why should I act as the preference I wouldn't have as a parent as an example for my behavior now. That would be hypocritical. But if you can honestly say you would be fully supportive of your daughter having sex with multiple men, in fact helping to pay large sums of money to ease that for convenience, then I guess I wouldn't know how to continue.
I think ultimately, deep down, the majority of the population would prefer the latter, which may offer another reason why people look down it. True love and all that jargon.
#103 to #26
-
srskate (08/23/2015) [-] Okay, so that anon came back and I've lost track of a lot.
And, to be quite honest, I have confidence that my daughter will grow up to be a smart, responsible woman who knows what she wants. If she so desires to practice safe sex with multiple partners, I would respect that decision to be fully honest, I would prefer not to hear about it though . I want to stress that this assumes she has safe sex.
To diverge, you see how annoyed anon is? How utterly incoherently enraged he is because I suggested people should have sex as they please. He immediately jumped to calling me a whore and slut, and I'm a man. I say, that is not okay.
And, to be quite honest, I have confidence that my daughter will grow up to be a smart, responsible woman who knows what she wants. If she so desires to practice safe sex with multiple partners, I would respect that decision to be fully honest, I would prefer not to hear about it though . I want to stress that this assumes she has safe sex.
To diverge, you see how annoyed anon is? How utterly incoherently enraged he is because I suggested people should have sex as they please. He immediately jumped to calling me a whore and slut, and I'm a man. I say, that is not okay.
#110 to #103
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-]
You deserve nothing but ridicule. Weak fathers create terrible women. Your permissive attitude guarantees you daughter will grow up to be unhappy. Anyone who encourages others to harm themselves deserves nothing but swift retribution and shaming. You deserve all you get and more.
#85 to #78
-
alarubra (08/22/2015) [-] Lol, I used to be a bit of a romantic. The person who finally convinced me sex could be divorced from emotion was a girl who had no emotional connection with 90% of her sexual partners. She's been with one guy for the past 4 years, the relationship started off open, because she "doesn't believe in monogamy," but she hasn't slept with anyone else since six months in. Though, I don't think they ever officially closed it. I think it's just that she doesn't use it anymore. I'm not saying people who divorce sex and emotion do so with all their partners, I certainly don't. But, casual, emotionless sex is possible regardless of gender.
I'm not saying it's possible for everyone, or even that it's not significantly more common in men. But, pretending there's a hard and fast rule is ridiculous.
I'm not saying it's possible for everyone, or even that it's not significantly more common in men. But, pretending there's a hard and fast rule is ridiculous.
#89 to #85
-
anon (08/22/2015) [-]
Not in the long term. Look at the graph. Look it up for yourself. The proof is overwhelming. There are long term consequences from this type of behavior. It only seems like a good idea in the short-term. Finding one or two people that don't conform to the data doesn't disprove it. That's not how science works, and believing empirical data doesn't make me a romantic.
#91 to #89
-
alarubra (08/22/2015) [-] My problem isn't with your data. It's with your interpretation of said data an the assumptions it's predicated on. We're talking Psychology with a hint of Sociology here. These are soft sciences. Also, I would argue that divorce is inherently traumatic, leading to higher rates of depression in people who got divorced after society told them it was the right thing to do based on outdated morals from times when building a family was the best thing for the species I do believe a 2-parent family unit is the best way to raise a child. . Now, we have severe overcrowding in major cities throughout the first world, 99% effective forms of birth control and STD prevention in the form of condoms, and hundreds of couples waiting to adopt, as well as abortion clinics, and the morning after pill in every civilized country. I see no reason for promiscuity to be taboo at all. I will agree it's not for everyone, but as your own data shows, neither is monogamy.
Also, on the gender line argument, I would argue that's much more about men who can't get over their emotions about their partner's sexual history, than women who haven't divorced their emotions from their sex life.
Also, on the gender line argument, I would argue that's much more about men who can't get over their emotions about their partner's sexual history, than women who haven't divorced their emotions from their sex life.
#93 to #91
-
anon (08/22/2015) [-]
PS I have no idea how you got that monogamy isn't for everyone from the data. The data show that brides with 0-1 lifetime sexual partners have the lowest divorce rates. Brides who slept around before they were married have, AT BEST, a 50/50 chance of a successful marriage. Your takeaway is this shows monogamy isn't for everyone?! Do you know what cognitive dissonance is?
Also, it's not soft data. The data is of people who got divorced before 10 years and the amount of sexual partners the bride had. That's empirical data. What the **** are you talking about?
Also, it's not soft data. The data is of people who got divorced before 10 years and the amount of sexual partners the bride had. That's empirical data. What the **** are you talking about?
#92 to #91
-
anon (08/22/2015) [-]
Every young person thinks they live in the time where traditional values are obsolete. When you grow up you learn there is nothing new. You are no different than the children of the 60's that decided family values were outdated. Every 20-year-old thinks they are the first people to discover their genitals, and the older people who try to guide them are just outdated. Then they grow up, have children of their own, and realize their parents were right. There's a saying that goes: By the time I learned my dad was right, I was old enough to have children of my own who thought I didn't know what I was talking about.
Your flippant attitude will catch up with you. I know I'm right because I've lived it. You can drone on about over-crowding and birth control, but your excuses don't sound any different than the excuses of the free-love generations or any other generation of 20-year-old- know-it-alls for that matter. I'm right. You're wrong. There is no debate. The only question is how much damage are this current batch young people that "know everything" are going to do to themselves before they realize the truth.
Your flippant attitude will catch up with you. I know I'm right because I've lived it. You can drone on about over-crowding and birth control, but your excuses don't sound any different than the excuses of the free-love generations or any other generation of 20-year-old- know-it-alls for that matter. I'm right. You're wrong. There is no debate. The only question is how much damage are this current batch young people that "know everything" are going to do to themselves before they realize the truth.
#74 to #24
-
anon (08/22/2015) [-] We get it. You're a whore who feels guilty deep down because you know you're disgusting so your trying to convince yourself that you aren't doing anything wrong. This is why you're getting so butt-hurt. You are doing something wrong, and you know it. Pointing that out to you isn't mean or judgmental or anything else you try to deflect with. Facts are facts. They have no agenda.
#90 to #74
-
alarubra (08/22/2015) [-] There are no morals inherent in facts. Even the extremes that we can all agree on are not objective facts, they are opinions. "Genocide is wrong." = Opinion. It's the popular opinion to the point where I'd have trouble finding a person to legitimately disagree with it, but it is an opinion. "Monogamy is the best system for relationships" = Opinion. Again, it's the popular opinion, but this one I know several people who disagree. "Monogamy is the only feasible system for a healthy relationship."=Opinion. Still, popular opinion, but there are more and more people who would need to think about their answer.
The facts in this case don't have an agenda, but you do, and it's one our society as a whole has. Your conclusions are not only predicated on the opinion that monogamy is the best system, but on the assumption that an inherent moral desire for monogamy exists in every person's subconscious, and everybody who isn't monogamous feels bad about it. I'd like to assure you that's not how everybody sees the world and certainly isn't the only way to interpret these facts.
The facts in this case don't have an agenda, but you do, and it's one our society as a whole has. Your conclusions are not only predicated on the opinion that monogamy is the best system, but on the assumption that an inherent moral desire for monogamy exists in every person's subconscious, and everybody who isn't monogamous feels bad about it. I'd like to assure you that's not how everybody sees the world and certainly isn't the only way to interpret these facts.
#94 to #90
-
anon (08/22/2015) [-] Yeah, you go ahead and be "different." You're the first one to ever try that one out, riiiggghhhttt. It's almost like older people have seen this movie before over and over and know how it ends EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Monogamy is the best way. That's not an opinion. It's verifiable.
"...outdated morals from times when building a family was the best thing for the species..."
You don't even realize how dumb you sound. 20-year-olds have been saying this at the beginning of every sophomore year since there were SOPHOMORE YEARS! It's so funny that you think you're living in a unique time, where "building a family is the best thing for society," isn't true. It is. It's the fundamental unit of government in a free society. It gives the best chance for successful children, and it is empirically proven that it is THE BEST WAY to fulfillment and happiness.
Good luck being edgy. Save this to read when you are 30, okay? Trust me. It will explain a lot. You'll be saying "Where did I go wrong? I was different! Different! The times were different! What happened?!" This little memory will come in handy.
Monogamy is the best way. That's not an opinion. It's verifiable.
"...outdated morals from times when building a family was the best thing for the species..."
You don't even realize how dumb you sound. 20-year-olds have been saying this at the beginning of every sophomore year since there were SOPHOMORE YEARS! It's so funny that you think you're living in a unique time, where "building a family is the best thing for society," isn't true. It is. It's the fundamental unit of government in a free society. It gives the best chance for successful children, and it is empirically proven that it is THE BEST WAY to fulfillment and happiness.
Good luck being edgy. Save this to read when you are 30, okay? Trust me. It will explain a lot. You'll be saying "Where did I go wrong? I was different! Different! The times were different! What happened?!" This little memory will come in handy.
#96 to #94
-
alarubra (08/23/2015) [-] Actually, I tried promiscuity, I've already decided it's ultimately not right for me. I want a monogamous relationship, marriage and kids, I have a ****** up genetic history, so I'm planning on adoption over having my own offspring, but ultimately, the traditional value life is where I hope to be by my early thirties. My point wasn't that it's not right for me, but that it's not necessarily right for every single person on the planet.
#75 to #22
-
anon (08/22/2015) [-] We get it. You're a whore who feels guilty deep down because you know you're disgusting so your trying to convince yourself that you aren't doing anything wrong. This is why you're getting so butt-hurt. You are doing something wrong, and you know it. Pointing that out to you isn't mean or judgmental or anything else you try to deflect with. Facts are facts. They have no agenda.
#113 to #104
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-]
You say promiscuous sex is okay.
1) YOU have the outrageous belief. You are in the extreme minority in society. That's easily verifiable. Look it up.
2) YOU are the one that needs to back it up.
3) I am not stating a belief. I am stating facts. The empirical data proves me right.
4) It says right on the top of the graph where the information is from. CAN YOU ******* READ?
1) YOU have the outrageous belief. You are in the extreme minority in society. That's easily verifiable. Look it up.
2) YOU are the one that needs to back it up.
3) I am not stating a belief. I am stating facts. The empirical data proves me right.
4) It says right on the top of the graph where the information is from. CAN YOU ******* READ?
#117 to #113
-
srskate (08/23/2015) [-] Dude, where's your chill?
And I'm arguing morals. There aren't really numbers for morals. I've backed up my claims with moral arguments.
You've backed up your claim with a picture and some shouting.
www.jstor.org/stable/352992?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
here's my study. It concluded that the risk increase is not statistically significant.
Now, where is your proof about casual sex easily showing that someone is mentally damaged.
And I'm arguing morals. There aren't really numbers for morals. I've backed up my claims with moral arguments.
You've backed up your claim with a picture and some shouting.
www.jstor.org/stable/352992?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
here's my study. It concluded that the risk increase is not statistically significant.
Now, where is your proof about casual sex easily showing that someone is mentally damaged.
#147 to #117
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-] "Dude, where's your chill?"
You are the faggiest faggot, dude. Really? Where's my chill? "Don't harsh my buzz, maaannn." Could you sound more like a cliche sophomore retard stoner? Kill yourself.
Well, it looks like you've given up anyway, and you've gone back to douchin' around campus so I'm going to go now. Enjoy your 20's because I can tell you your 30's are going to be really sad.
Eat **** , ****** !
You are the faggiest faggot, dude. Really? Where's my chill? "Don't harsh my buzz, maaannn." Could you sound more like a cliche sophomore retard stoner? Kill yourself.
Well, it looks like you've given up anyway, and you've gone back to douchin' around campus so I'm going to go now. Enjoy your 20's because I can tell you your 30's are going to be really sad.
Eat **** , ****** !
#76 to #15
-
anon (08/22/2015) [-] We get it. You're a whore who feels guilty deep down because you know you're disgusting so your trying to convince yourself that you aren't doing anything wrong. This is why you're getting so butt-hurt. You are doing something wrong, and you know it. Pointing that out to you isn't mean or judgmental or anything else you try to deflect with. Facts are facts. They have no agenda.
#114 to #105
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-]
I'm not. Saying that you're ideas are stupid doesn't mean I'm pissed. It means that I think your ideas are stupid. I'm actually laughing at you for thinking you are unique in being the first group of young people to discover sex and think that their parents don't know what they are talking about and their values are outdated.
#150 to #119
-
anon (08/23/2015) [-] You're the beta white-knight cuck that had no need to wade into this other than to defend these two women that you don't know. You've only had sex with one person. This doesn't concern you, and you are literally the cliche, faggy, scrawny, college sophomore I though you were. You didn't have to post your pic. I could have drawn you without ever seeing you. What a faggot. You start off with >>#13 and say I'm the one getting angry! LOL! Eat a bag of dicks.
#77 to #13
-
anon (08/22/2015) [-] We get it. You're a whore who feels guilty deep down because you know you're disgusting so your trying to convince yourself that you aren't doing anything wrong. This is why you're getting so butt-hurt. You are doing something wrong, and you know it. Pointing that out to you isn't mean or judgmental or anything else you try to deflect with. Facts are facts. They have no agenda.
