i dont think he was that much of a dick here, i mean **** hes just fighting fire with fire.

Were you triggered faggot?

an asshole yes but an asshole with good points

He was really polite though, I mean he even left when asked to.

Its more like hes combatting crazy with crazy, and you can't deny that he was fairly respectful at first

The absolute WORST part was when I saw the Saga comic for sale by that hat wearing Femenazi, just because it has a "realistic" (Pretty true statement for the most part) representation of women in relationships, and was illustrated by Fiona Staples, who is super talented it really pissed me off. THAT was the point in which I didn't care what he did at the convention, I just wanted it burned to the ground

To be honest, I didn't feel like he acted all dickey and douchbaggy.
In all honesty, I do feel like he was quite polite and that he did ask his questions as politely as possible and he also did have a point.
Seriously, how are men in a movie counted as a trigger warning, a menstruating Jesus, however, is not?

"They did it first!" isn't a good argument, dude.

no ofcourse not
But them doing it first does kill my sympathy when it comes back around

so ultimately, idc if it's a ****** argument
they did it first

It's not like anything significant is happening
There's no violence or even incitement for any, and even one asshole is incapable of socially "damaging" or ostracizing an entire group

So yeah
**** 'em
they deserve it

Unless it was literally those exact people doing it, it's not exactly fair to say this.

No individual group of SJWs speaks for feminism as a whole, no matter how easy it would be to make fun of them if it were true.

They do speak for the whole though
Seeing as they all seem to say the same **** , and dissent is prettymuch not allowed in the banner's ranks, they kind of have to say the same **** by what passes for feminist law

ofcourse individuals vary but that's the thing about feminism, it seems
They prettymuch eliminate individualism and stress groupthink

I mean, I'm sympathetic to where you're coming from, I guess, but please do acknowledge how ridiculous it is to use this "they" stuff to try to group up everyone like that. You're saying that these specific people deserve something annoying/bad happening to them because people who think similarly to them often do annoying/bad things to other people.

Removing individualism and stressing the mob mentality/groupthink stuff isn't good, but neither is putting those words toward them. I think you'll find that a lot of the things denoted as ******** SJW stuff have some merit, and only the real crazies are out here doing this kind of **** .

Well I only really use 'they' because the phrase 'everyone Ive seen who is identifiable as being within this established group overall' is long-winded

I'm saying that these specific people are easily identified as being a aprt of a group which demonstrably eencourages mental and ideological hegemony and aggressively attacks and eliminates any form of diversity therein, their claims for advocation being limited to appearance, and what they deserve is the same unpleasant treatment that their group imposes upon others

So yes they deserve something annoying happening to them, for being clearly identifiable as being involved with a group which is, at it's core, consistently annoying

thus I'm not entirely fussed about being better than them, because I know that I already am, by far, and that occasionally stooping to their level will not be significant enough
bad is a bit vague and I don't like what it could be used to imply with broad thinking

What group is that? Feminism?

Feminism is fine. It's great, even.

What some of the people in this video were doing just wasn't what most people would consider actual feminism. But that's the issue when you have a group/organization with no formal leadership - people are free to claim the label and act however they want under it.

I don't think feminism is consistently annoying. I think SJWs are, of course, for their tendencies to abandon logic.

However, this was, intentionally at least, a feminist gathering. I don't think it's fair to lump everyone here into that group of annoying people, and regardless of that, I don't think stooping to their level or being willing to abandon reason in favor of some petty little "ha! i know you didn't learn anything from being annoyed, but i like seeing you uncomfortable!" is mature or rational.

Declaring yourself to be better than people is edgy and immature. I'm glad I grew out of that phase that funnyjunk seems stuck in.

I stand against the claim that "it isn't real feminism" because, for one, there is no crieteria
Nothing codified and no list of criteria, or requirements for entry

At this point if something is declared to be feminist, there is nothing to rule out it being feminist
But then there is also the problem that, as a statement, it doesn't help
whatsoever

They all declare themselves feminist
They operate under feminist banners and feminist leaders and figureheads
They understand themselves to be known as feminist, and everyone understands them to be known as feminist

At this point they have effectively re-defined feminism by sheer force of presence

Saying they aren't is no longer viable, as it changes nothing about what they do and what they say and the name they give themselves
It's useless

Of course, I don't agree with the no-true-scotsman defense for it either.

I'm just saying I hope you don't take a currently-popular sect of feminism as a viable reason to declare all who operate under the feminist banner equally ****** .

But from what I've seen, the "popular sect" is all that there is under the banner
Like it's not JUST the true sctosman problem but

It's almost like someone insisting there are real scotsmen just over there where you can't see anybody

But they're there
honest

Well, yes, but I think that can be chalked up to the nature of these SJWs. They're attention-whores. They soak up all the media attention.

Look at /r/TwoXChromosomes to see very legitimate discussions of very legitimate issues, for example. Or /r/MensRights for the same thing in a different sphere. There are also circlejerky disgusting cesspools of society in /r/RedPill and /r/radfems, and /r/feminism has ****** mods.

A good feminist doesn't need the media focused on him/her to make a difference in the world.