Upload
Login or register
x

SJW claim biology doesn't exist,

 
(Enlarge)
SJW claim biology doesn't exist,. mfw people are legitimately this retarded. Mag # In I Follow Everyone keeps saying "It is a boy" but we won' t really know unt
(Enlarge)
SJW claim biology doesn't exist,. mfw people are legitimately this retarded. Mag # In I Follow Everyone keeps saying "It is a boy" but we won' t really know unt

mfw people are legitimately this retarded

Mag # In I Follow
Everyone keeps saying "It is a boy" but we
won' t really know until the child announces
which gender they will identify as, right?
F Reply " Retweet I Fayette
Ian Donovan In
delivering doctor]
More
I Follow
MALE, LET THEM DECIDE GENDER
LATER THANKS"
ISN' T IT A BIT TOO EARLY TO IMPOSE
GENDER ROLES TO IT ALREADY?
Favorite ... More
I Follow
A, I Follow
It may be a boy - depends on how they
choose to express their gender if at all
Freely " Retweet ‘Favorite ... Mare
eh please do not try and force a gender on
the royal baby already plz
Freely ... More
Teen YOU) :] In I Follow
Hannah Jones In
Congratulations to Will and Kate, shame
about the gender
Freely " Retweet ‘Favorite nu Mare
I Follow
ll we
Sandra and Jimmie In
omen!
Peculiar that when gender equality is
gaining some momentum and no urgency to
have a male heir to an obsolete throne, a
male heir is borne.
I Follow
A, I Follow
Of course the royal baby might not even
have a binary gender.
Freely " Retweet ‘Favorite nu Mare
an were rea,: Carree
Amanda” In
neither that it identifies with imo.
4\ Remy " Retweet ‘Favorite nu More
I Follow
mean styx In I Follow
but seriously, isn' t it a bit early to be forcing
gender roles on the poor child?
Freely " Retweet ‘Favorite nu Mare
Okay, so the ' s not a girl. Can I
hold out hope he turns out to be gay or
gender ? Otherwise, I' m
bored now.
r Eritrean
Freely " Retweet ‘Favorite nu Mare
8 Justin
Not everything has to be an argument about gender
identity,
Details
Katherine Catherine In I Follow
Cf It wouldn' t be if most people
wouldn' t compulsively relate gender to
genitals
Frames! *Favoite not Mare
Charles C. W. Cooke In I Follow
Pretty insensitive of the media to report that
the royal baby is a boy before its had a
chance to establish its own gender identity.
Freely ‘Favorite nu More
Shane Bailey In I Follow
Personally I think its too soon to impose
gender roles on the baby.
Christopher J. Hogan
u! _ Hugarr
Birth of the # exposes the media' s
love of patriarchy and '.
I' m hoping Wills k Kate have a healthy trans
baby.
4\ Remy " Retweet In More
Still could be a future Queen. If he' s lucky.
I Follow
o In I Follow
an were
Bethlehem
the thing where the baby' s genitals are
announced to the world is, btw, the source
of literally all of my pain as a trans woman
Miami " Revues! ‘Favorite nu More
HI ?IEHA-
wee
an were rea,: Carree
In I Follow
I think they should let the baby decided its
own name and gender #
Freely 21 Retiree! craveme n. More
Reply to @w/
was
and nationality
Details
I' m afraid until the child decides its gender,
you' re all gonna have to wait a little longer.."
Freely " Retweet ‘Favorite nu Mare
I Follow
ll we
Has anyone asked the baby' s opinion on its
gender? #
4\ Remy " Retweet ‘Favorite nu More
Sharon J Dewitt
femminism down Kate! Could have had a
girl third in line to the throne, instead it' s a
sausage party.
4\ Remy " Retweet In More
H Kate Negan In
As a townswomen, it' s beyond disturbing
how society obsesses over the gender of a
new child.
Favorite endure
SEAN TM In
I think they should let the baby decided its
own name and gender #
Freely " Retweet ‘Favorite nu More
Luke Homer In I Follow
clumsy
I Follow
I Follow
I Follow
ll we
Shane Conjoin In I Follow
raww!
It' s a bit premature to be calling the royal
baby a "boy," right? Geez, let' s let the kid
develop a gender identity first.
Freely " Retweet ‘Favorite nu Mare
ll 22 PM mum we
Allow catelyn In
I Follow
Wish baby announcements could be "IT' S A
BABY" "IT' S NAME IS" instead of
ASSIGNED GENDER ASSIGNED
GENDER ASSIGNED GENDER"
Freely " Retweet ‘Favorite nu Mare
ITES Bin
an were
...
+51
Views: 5728
Favorited: 2
Submitted: 09/15/2015
Share On Facebook
submit to reddit +Favorite Subscribe to flynox

Comments(21):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
21 comments displayed.
Reply
+14
#1 - dotheherpaderp (09/15/2015) [-]
"Wish baby announcements could be ITS A BABY instead"

What the **** else do you expect to slither out of a woman in labor, you mangy twat
Reply
0
User avatar #13 to #1 - thelizardlord (09/16/2015) [-]
Well it could be a raptor.
Reply
+1
#18 to #13 - anon (09/16/2015) [-]
"It's a raptor!" *Terrified screams*
Reply
+6
#4 - kristovsky (09/16/2015) [-]
The concept of Gender is social science ******** anyway, there are males and females, the two sexes.
Reply
0
User avatar #9 to #4 - peezle (09/16/2015) [-]
Gender is more related to biology.

Gender Roles are more related to Sociology.
Reply
+3
User avatar #12 to #9 - bluenebula (09/16/2015) [-]
Gender roles are more based in biology than you think. Men don't work more because that's a gender roll, it's because they are physically stronger and get more satisfaction from achieving short term goals. This is also why men are more partial to watch and participate in sports and video games. Women are drawn to motherly roles like teaching, care-giving, and nursing due to the chemical response in their brains that says "This is good". It's a human development. Humans wouldn't get very far if the person giving birth didn't care for their child.

That's not to say everything is rooted in biology. Men liking blue while women like pink is a product of marketing. It wasn't really planned, that's just how it happened. Women loving diamond rings is another example of imposed ideals, that one being intentional. Any purposely implemented gender roll is done through marketing for the sake of sales.
Reply
+3
#5 - garymotherfingoak (09/16/2015) [-]
>going out of your way to find SJW stupidity to piss yourself off with
>using horribly watermarked stock pics
Reply
+5
User avatar #10 to #5 - flynox [OP](09/16/2015) [-]
the watermark is part of the joke
Reply
+3
User avatar #8 - cheastnut ONLINE (09/16/2015) [-]
"maybe they aren't gender binary" yeah key word MAYBE these people need to understand there are under 1% of the population that's trans and 2-3% that are gay. people are raised as straight non-trans because it's more then likely anything else it provides clearly lines and paths for kids to see to give them and understanding of how life works and what's happening to them and if they know that doesn't fit for them it gives them clear boarders to know where they stand. you can't make everybody happy but you should want to make as many people happy as you can happy. "as many people as possible" is called the majority.
Reply
0
#15 to #8 - anon (09/16/2015) [-]
Yeah, not only that, but having/making up mental disorders is the current trend.
The majority of these people will eventually grow out of their stupid attention seeking snowflake phase and go back to being normal.
Reply
+1
User avatar #3 - hoponthefeelstrain (09/15/2015) [-]
little late huh?
Reply
0
User avatar #20 - lwlarcopolio (09/16/2015) [-]
I'm already pissed enough that we still have royalty, but this **** needs to stop. It is a boy. Deal with it.
Reply
0
User avatar #19 - nyuORlucy (09/16/2015) [-]
despite sjw evidence, most humans prefer their birth gender.
Reply
0
#17 - willindor (09/16/2015) [-]
The commoners are acting up again
Reply
0
#16 - epodax (09/16/2015) [-]
MFW people continue to milk feminism / bigotry like this to get greenies. Seriously, we get it, they are dumb, but this is old news.
Reply
0
#14 - panzerfront (09/16/2015) [-]
Every time I see stuff like this all I can think is that maybe Hitler was right. He didn't do anything wrong
Reply
0
#11 - kungfuchedder (09/16/2015) [-]
Sharon J. Dewitt places the blame on Kate for not having a girl.
I want to pelt her with baseballs.

Reply
0
User avatar #2 - highkingtorygg (09/15/2015) [-]
vigilante justice avenging the net loss of intelligence is looking more appealing
Reply
0
#6 to #2 - garymotherfingoak (09/16/2015) [-]
jokes aside, that sounds good in theory, but you have to be at a net loss of intelligence for yourself to not realize the problems with it.
Reply
0
User avatar #7 to #6 - highkingtorygg (09/16/2015) [-]
true. Many things would make it impossible, but if someone hint hint were to try Hint Hint I wouldn't object HINT HINT
 
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)