Upload
Login or register
x

Comments(247):

Leave a comment Refresh Comments Show GIFs
123>
[ 247 comments ]
Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest
Anonymous comments allowed.
182 comments displayed.
Reply
+358
User avatar #1 - zourch ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
you can make anything sound stupid if you add
"we've walked on the ******* moon but...", in front of it

Reply
+25
#77 to #1 - anon (01/09/2016) [-]
It is literally the "It's the current year!" "argument", only without expiration date.
Reply
+18
User avatar #86 to #77 - opticmonkey ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
The current year doesn't have an expiration date, at the end of the year the current year just changes
Reply
+3
#143 to #86 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
**anonymous used "*roll picture*"**
**anonymous rolled image**it's the current year and people still use the it's the current year argument? c'mon get with the times
Reply
+19
User avatar #45 to #1 - bombadealar (01/09/2016) [-]
We have walked on the moon but arabs are still shooting themselfs in the middle east. come on its the current year
Reply
+68
User avatar #14 to #1 - fightforfate ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
"we've walked on the ******* moon but we haven't walked on the sun"
Reply
+1
User avatar #80 to #14 - purdon (01/09/2016) [-]
You might as well be walking on the sun.
Reply
+1
User avatar #28 to #14 - admiralen ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Its just a matter of time mate, science is getting farther and farther every day, one day you will be able to buy a house on the sun and have a good excuse to wear shades wherever you go
Reply
+1
#24 to #14 - lemonpizzapie (01/09/2016) [-]
we'll have to obviously wait until it's night until we can go there.
Reply
0
#207 to #1 - kingderps (01/10/2016) [-]
We've walked on the moon, but my computer can't make hamburgers?
Reply
0
User avatar #167 to #1 - ubercookieboy (01/10/2016) [-]
We've walked on the ******* moon but Segways

...

Thinking about it I didn't need to say the first part
Reply
+1
User avatar #191 to #1 - neokun (01/10/2016) [-]
We've walked on the ******* moon but has the moon ******* walked on us?
Reply
+2
User avatar #134 to #1 - cubanwhiteman (01/10/2016) [-]
We've walked on the moon but we still can't figure out why kids love cinnamon toast crunch
Reply
+18
User avatar #18 to #1 - artyomthebadass (01/09/2016) [-]
We have walked on the moon...but OP is still a faggot.

Nope seems pretty normal to me
Reply
+18
User avatar #39 to #1 - angelious (01/09/2016) [-]
we have walked on the moon but my cellphone that is hundreds of times more advanced than the equipment that flew us there cant get a signal in the forest
Reply
+18
#76 to #1 - thedankmemer (01/09/2016) [-]
GIF
**thedankmemer used "*roll picture*"**
**thedankmemer rolled image***roll picture* We've walked on the ******* moon but I have no gf
Reply
+6
User avatar #184 to #76 - wobblewub ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
it's alright, you rolled gay robot wife
Reply
+18
#95 to #1 - captaincapital (01/10/2016) [-]
Oh cmon, it's [CURRENT YEAR]
Reply
+18
#112 to #1 - thisnameispink (01/10/2016) [-]
we've walked on the ******* moon but Graves can't have a ******* cigar?
Reply
+18
User avatar #121 to #1 - demonatatoo (01/10/2016) [-]
We've walked on the ******* moon but the US still doesn't have public health care.

Damn, you're right.
Reply
+17
User avatar #85 to #1 - wltwitch (01/09/2016) [-]
Stupid because these sheep believed we landed on the moon, right?
Reply
+4
#140 to #85 - innocentbabies (01/10/2016) [-]
I got this:

We've walked on the ******* moon, but we still have sheeple who think we've landed on the moon.
Reply
+4
User avatar #163 to #140 - wltwitch (01/10/2016) [-]
you blew my mind
Reply
+6
#139 to #1 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
We've walked on the ******* moon but I still can't see why kids love the taste of cinnamon toast crunch.
Reply
+1
#156 to #139 - theminatour ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
You are anon, so downvoted. but here is a nice picture.
Reply
+2
User avatar #158 to #156 - superpianobros (01/10/2016) [-]
The character is Inubashiri Momiji for anyone wondering.
Reply
+1
User avatar #159 to #158 - theminatour ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
I should have put that in myself, thanks.
Reply
0
User avatar #160 to #159 - superpianobros (01/10/2016) [-]
well it was just a quick google search, I just wanted to be nice and save people the trouble
Reply
0
#197 to #156 - simonhatesfj (01/10/2016) [-]
Ooooooh!
(Searches Inubashiri)
"Touhou Project"
why
Reply
+19
User avatar #2 to #1 - PRotofuzz (01/09/2016) [-]
"We've walked on the moon, but can we do the moonwalk?"

Reply
+2
User avatar #58 to #1 - ghettograndpa (01/09/2016) [-]
To be honest, with the one at hand, you don't even need it.
Reply
+17
User avatar #61 to #1 - europe (01/09/2016) [-]
We've walked on the moon and now we're getting closer to artificially growing human organs in a lab.
Reply
+1
User avatar #194 to #61 - thelastelephant (01/10/2016) [-]
maybe I can get a new trachea, because mine is ******
Reply
0
User avatar #146 to #61 - ilovehitler (01/10/2016) [-]
But you didn't add the whole phrase
"We've walked on the ******* moon but now we're getting closer to artificially growing human organs in a lab" just sounds stupid
Reply
+1
#169 to #1 - assholy (01/10/2016) [-]
"We've walked on the ******* moon but we haven't walked on mars yer" amidoingitrite¿
Reply
+13
User avatar #92 to #1 - sarcasmexplain (01/10/2016) [-]
we've walked on the ******* moon but here I am wasting my life on Funnyjunk
Reply
0
#236 to #1 - buddahudda (01/10/2016) [-]
We've walked on the ******* moon, how have I not earn my privilege to **** a goose. I contribute to society, I've done jury duty, and I pay my taxes, but the law man tells me not to think about it. I earned the privilege to **** a goose god damn it.
Reply
+18
User avatar #60 to #1 - mrwalkerfour (01/09/2016) [-]
we've walked on the moon but GOD FORBID i touch a toddlers dick because thats just so unthinkable comapred to walking on the ****** moon

god damn moralistic society
Reply
+8
User avatar #68 to #60 - SuperSixONE (01/09/2016) [-]
I feel like the NSA are going to come after me, and I only read your comment
Reply
-2
#122 to #1 - cwsamss (01/10/2016) [-]
Social matters and walking on the moon are so different. Why the **** would you compare them?
Reply
+18
#49 to #1 - anon (01/09/2016) [-]
we've walked on the ******* moon but Hitler was a monster. oh my god it does work.
Reply
+1
#162 to #49 - mamenber (01/10/2016) [-]
It works because your sentence was nonsense in the first place
Reply
+66
#83 to #1 - scorcho (01/09/2016) [-]
we've walked on the ******* moon, but i still can't believe it's not butter
Reply
+157
#40 - Elemental (01/09/2016) [-]
This post is ******** .

Now, I'm am a horny dog like the rest of us, but telling a girl she can't wear shorts because it's distracting to me is insulting. I have restraint. I'm not some mindless rape machine.
Reply
0
User avatar #229 to #40 - muhamidallea (01/10/2016) [-]
The reason she wants to wear revealing clothing is to attract men or women YEE when you are in an environment where procreation should be the last thing on your mind, provocative clothing is not good for efficiency. You may not want to ******* rape her but its hard to do maths with grade A ass bent over the desk in front of you.
Reply
0
User avatar #247 to #40 - thepizzadevourer ONLINE (01/11/2016) [-]
I think it's less about "boys can't restrain themselves" and more about "We don't want the girls that attend our school to dress like prostitutes".
Reply
-2
User avatar #148 to #40 - ilovehitler (01/10/2016) [-]
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the Jamals and Muhammads
Reply
-1
#226 to #148 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
this is true though, I don't know why they thumbed u down lol, cannot accept reality?
Reply
+5
User avatar #91 to #40 - onerace (01/10/2016) [-]
Hey I'm not against them wearing shorts but I'm a stone cold rape machine okay.
Reply
+3
#185 to #40 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
I am though.
Reply
+3
User avatar #200 to #40 - thesoulless ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
It isn't really because it's distracting, but because it's a matter of professionalism. You can't show up for your job wearing a tube top and a skirt so short that it barely covers your ass because it's unprofessional. The distraction thing is either something that some administrator, who was panicking about their authority being questioned, either pulled out of their ass or flubbed out while they were trying to explain that it's about professionalism. But it's probably the former, because all administrators are incompetent until proven otherwise.
Reply
+13
User avatar #81 to #40 - bongpebbles (01/09/2016) [-]
What girls call shorts these days are basically jean panties.
Reply
+9
User avatar #88 to #81 - kennyh ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
So the **** what?
Reply
-2
User avatar #107 to #88 - darktoucan ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
little girls running around in demeaning clothing. id have to say alot of the the **** what
Reply
+3
User avatar #109 to #107 - kennyh ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
demeaning. ***** no one forced them to wear it, what kind of white knight thinks girls should have a list of what they can and can't wear?

tip your fedora right on the **** out
Reply
-5
User avatar #113 to #109 - darktoucan ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
thats just silly talk right there and jumping right to "ohh you are a white night" just makes you look stupid and unable to give a good argument. letting kids wear skimpy clothes leads to whoreish behavior which leads to many other problems. they also use their bodies to get what they want and its not like its only a few girls doing it. in short proper dress will make a proper person, once they turn 18 or whatever its their choice but you and i both know how mendable the young mind can be. growing up like that makes for bad people that think they can do anything.
Reply
+10
#142 to #113 - innocentbabies (01/10/2016) [-]
What people choose to wear is influenced by how they feel. There's no reason to believe that wearing skimpy clothing turns you into a slut anymore than there's reason to believe that wearing a suit will make somebody qualified to run a major corporation.
Reply
+7
#183 to #142 - legolego ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
exactly. i am occasionally forced to wear a suit, and believe me, i'm still just as useless a human being as normal
Reply
+3
User avatar #115 to #113 - kennyh ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
The word "demeaning" doesn't have a place in this discussion. That you brought it up immediately gave me the image of a white knight sipping wine and saying how he prefers girls fully clothed and they shouldn't demean themselves by wearing skimpy clothes.

Skimpy clothes do not lead to "whorish behavior", (some more white knight babble right there) "whorish behavior" leads to overly skimpy clothing.

"Proper dress"? And who makes this list of proper dress and demand girls adhere to it? You?

"Growing up like that makes for bad people" lol

Reply
-4
User avatar #118 to #115 - darktoucan ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
it does and their should be a dress code for school like there is in some schools. again back to your white night insults, its just sad that you cant think of anything else to say other than that and quoting me then making fun of it. we are done
Reply
+2
User avatar #120 to #118 - kennyh ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Haha I bring up quite a few points and all you can say is that all I can think of are insults and don't address any of my questions? lulz.

Tell you what, you make up a list of appropriate clothing for girls and we will go hand out pamphlets tomorrow telling them what they should wear.

Or we could just move to Saudi Arabia where that sort of thing already exists! Wouldn't that be fun?

Then you would not be subjected to such vile, whorish behavior like shorts!

Or those darn "bad people" who just "grew up that way"

Reply
-1
#151 to #120 - semidemon ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
the way you lead this conversation leads me to think of two things:
the first is that you dont understand what darktoucan is talking about, but rather you seem to be angry about what he said for some unknown reason and as a result are lashing out
the other is that you fail to understand the full implications of having a uniform VS everyone wearing whatever they like. have you ever thought about why it is considered a norm to wear formal clothes to an even of any kind of importance? or why armies, prisons, corporations, hospitals, etc have uniforms?
making sure that females dont wear overly revealing clothing is but a small factor
by the way, stop jumping from one extreme to the other, the world isnt black and white... and calling people names will not make your argument more valid, neither will it make you sound more compelling, and it definitely doesnt make you sound mature and worthy of having a conversation with
Reply
0
User avatar #238 to #151 - kennyh ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
No you are right. Children should adhere to the standards of a professional in their place of work all through their childhood.
Reply
-2
#239 to #238 - semidemon ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
yes, it is how children are taught how to hold themselves in society
not to mention school isnt supposed to be all fun and games anyway
i do sincerely hope you arent being a sarcastic
Reply
0
User avatar #240 to #239 - kennyh ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Of course I am being sarcastic!
Children shouldn't be raised as if they are in an "army, prison cooperation or hospital"

And honestly that's the most self-hurting "argument I've ever seen.
Reply
-2
#241 to #240 - semidemon ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
it seems you are not understanding... youll understand when you gather some more life experience
Reply
+4
#129 to #40 - gloriousthighs (01/10/2016) [-]
I disapprove of any clothing that doesn't suit the setting. I like to dress nicely and act respectful. I wouldn't wear a tank top to school because it is a formal setting and should be treated as such. Shorts are of course fine here in Aus (because the sun is only a few metres away) as long as they aren't miniature. There's a time and a place for this stuff and highschool kids should not be focusing on dressing provocatively and getting an easy root.
Reply
0
#195 to #129 - thehistorylover (01/10/2016) [-]
**thehistorylover used "*roll picture*"**
**thehistorylover rolled image**A formal setting? School? Maybe a fancy private school for rich kids, or a Japanese school. Perhaps I'm wrong, though. Perhaps since I graduated, school has changed. I just remember that back when I was in school, you didn't wear formal attire, because school wasn't formal. It was everyday work. Yeah, you weren't supposed to show up in your underwear, but a pair of jeans and a T-shirt was perfectly fine.
Reply
0
#213 to #195 - gloriousthighs (01/10/2016) [-]
I should rephrase, not overly formal but thought should be put into your appearance. Same goes for every day life, smart casual is always better than just casual when you're outside your house.

I'm in Aus though so we wear uniforms at every school.
Reply
0
#245 to #213 - thehistorylover (01/10/2016) [-]
I see what you're saying. I was raised in U.S.A., and I've never even seen a kid wearing a uniform growing up. I thought it was just an anime thing until I was around 18.
Reply
+4
User avatar #180 to #40 - psychotayto (01/10/2016) [-]
It's not a matter of distraction but a matter of principle.
You go to school to learn, not to dress like a whore, if you wanna dress like a whore that's fine and dandy but go do it someplace else that isn't a school where people try to learn **** .

You wouldn't go to work in short shorts, a tank top, and cowboy boots so why would you do it in a school?
Reply
0
#196 to #180 - thehistorylover (01/10/2016) [-]
... Depends on what your work is, really.
Reply
+6
User avatar #128 to #40 - masdercheef (01/10/2016) [-]
For serious, mate. School dress codes not only tell girls their bodies are just a distraction, it tells guys they would be distracted by it. It's just a ****** thing that should end.
Reply
+3
User avatar #145 to #128 - FlyingButt (01/10/2016) [-]
The problem is that a lot of guy would be distracted. A lot of guys I knew from school were always distracted by girls. So here's the thing. You want them to show respect to you by accepting that you're capable of restraint at the cost of other people's concentration in class.

"School dress codes not only tell girls their bodies are just a distraction, it tells guys they would be distracted by it."

This is complete and utter ******** . To a guy in school, a girl's body is just a distraction. You can complain and whine about how ****** that sounds but it's true. They are there to learn new information, but instead they stare at some girl's chest. Sure, not all guys will do it, but why **** over those who will just because it gives a bad message?

For **** sake, not everyone is the same person. Just because you can handle this stuff doesn't mean everyone else can.
Reply
+7
User avatar #108 to #40 - hotschurl (01/10/2016) [-]
I think it's more about preventing boys from getting distracted and not paying attention at school because boners, not about rape fears. But I agree, everyone should be allowed to wear what they want, if others get distracted it's their problem.
Reply
+16
User avatar #59 - mrwalkerfour (01/09/2016) [-]
i dont think its to do with guys getting horny as much as its to do with whats ******* acceptable for a child to wear at school. 13 year olds shouldnt dress slutty ANYWAYS, even if there are zero guys, its ******* disgusting for a parent to let their child dress like that.

when shes an adult she can dress how she likes but as a child its down to the parents to teach their kid that dressing like a slut isnt normal.
Reply
+16
#51 - tazze (01/09/2016) [-]
bull. **** . boys these days shouldn't have a problem with some shorts and a bit of cleveage, at age 12 I was already watching porn on a fairly regular basis, that kind of visual stimulation in class was meaningless, you know who that kind of clothing could affect? the sheltered children of ultra religious families who can only hope to see so much and whose parents are the main users of that "but muh distractions" argument, besides kids who simply didn't study jack **** and wanted to use some crappy excuse.
Reply
0
#164 to #51 - shadeymuffin (01/10/2016) [-]
I don't know, I think it's a pretty subjective thing friend. I was watching porn pretty regularly as well and was in no way sheltered from sexually suggestive forms of media, but I was still pretty distracted by the hot girls in my classes, and in my experience (which I understand relates to no one else's in anyway) the girls with the big boobs for their age were regularly flaunting them to everyone.
Reply
+2
User avatar #53 to #51 - krobeles (01/09/2016) [-]
Honestly, I'm actually in agreement with the whole "muh distractions" thing. You go to school to study, not to look at tits. Kids are already distracted enough as it is, especially boys, so they dont exactly need anything to further distract them. Also, school should be a diciplinary enviroment, where people treat each other with a certain degree of academic distance, respect and professionalism. That professionalism breaks down, if all the girls are dressed like hookers and the guys are drooling over them. Granted, this is all predicated on a very non-libral, "people are idiots and easily distracted" philosophy, but honestly, when you're a 13 years old boy, you sorta are an idiot.
I cant for the life of me, understand why you'de want to show off your body in school either.

I'm not religious, nor really a prude. I just dont think school is the right enviroment for that kind of conduct.
Reply
0
#56 to #53 - tazze (01/09/2016) [-]
it's not being 13 what makes them idiots, it's rampant hormones, I wish big pharma could help us with that
picture is a reference to Equilibrium, go watch it
Reply
+46
#13 - peanutsaurusrex ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
IF YOU WANT TO SHOW OFF YA BOOTYLICIOUS BOOTY

JUST GO STAND ON THE SIDE OF THE STREET AND DO IT

WHATS THE DIFFEREEEEEEENCCEEEEEEEEE
Reply
+2
#103 to #13 - anon (01/10/2016) [-]
Hey uh postingloydly. Dis ***** tryna steal yer job
Reply
+10
User avatar #27 - froot (01/09/2016) [-]
I never understood the whole complaining about a dress code.
Then again, I went to a school with uniforms, as is the norm here in the UK. Wearing our own clothes was a ******* god send, and we all willingly gave money to the school to do it on the rare days they allowed it. Except for that one time when my brain decided the non-uniform day was a week earlier than it actually was. Because I lived over an hour away from the school and my parents were both disabled, they just let me keep my own **** on. So there was a scene queen sat in Maths class while everyone was in their uniforms and I got two non-uniform days in as many weeks. **** was cash, but it meant I was scrambling for an outfit for the second one. Yes, non uniform days were so important to social status that people planned their outfits for the next one almost as soon as one was over.

But even with uniforms, people in my school got coded. Mostly girls rolling their skirts up to make them shorter. I just stuck with trousers because **** , they made my butt look good.

The point of a dress code is to help people realise what is and isn't appropriate for a working environment.

For anyone saying uniforms stop guys being sexual and **** , let me stop you right there. I'd get people yelling at me to get my tits out all the time. I may or may not have had the biggest ones in my year.
Reply
+7
User avatar #35 to #27 - kegget (01/09/2016) [-]
britfag here too
All through school I got in trouble for wearing pants, because the girls were supposed to wear skirts. Even in the winter.
Think I had every right to complain about that, it's retarded.
Reply
+1
User avatar #36 to #35 - froot (01/09/2016) [-]
Oh yeah, that's stupid. If my school had done that, I'd have just collected loads of colourful tights and knee high socks and stuff and worn those every day in the winter. They got a complaint? "These are the warmest things I have for my legs. I'm on buses for three hours every day. In the dark. In the cold. Would you rather I got frostbite or hypothermia?" I was indeed a little **** in school

I mean, hell, I got away with wearing grey skinny jeans for like 3 weeks at my school because we were the last year to be allowed grey trousers and in year 10 the seams to one of the legs in my black trousers tore up to the knee. I showed my form tutor and said the only other pair of trousers I had that were appropriate to the uniform were grey skinny jeans (even though I had a spare pair of black trousers) and she was just like "okay" and let me wear them.
Reply
+2
User avatar #37 to #36 - kegget (01/09/2016) [-]
There was no chance in hell we would've gotten away with that. It was a public school but it was so ridiculously strict. We were only allowed to wear black or navy blue bobbles. Really, if we were caught wearing light blue bobbles we'd be told to take it out and be given an elastic band. We couldn't wear hard plastic hairbands either, just those soft ones.

I got into so much trouble all through school for stupid **** like dying my hair, wearing pants and getting my nose pierced. I swear if guns were as accessible here as they were in america, I would've shot that place up. I did so terribly in school because of how strict it was, i was in the lowest "naughty classes"... And now I'm studying to become a vet.
Reply
+1
User avatar #66 to #37 - biscuitsunited (01/09/2016) [-]
Don't even start, state, catholic school.
Sock colours and shoe polish were monitored; god it was hellish, only turned the heating in for OFSTED
We actually banned onw-clothes-days because the undermined the uniform.
Reply
+1
User avatar #67 to #66 - kegget (01/09/2016) [-]
We had it banned too. Mine was catholic school as well, I hated it so much.
I remember the first time we were learning about a religion other than christianity. Out of absolute curiousity, i asked the teacher why we were christian and not jewish, like how do you pick one? My answer was a week in isolation.
Reply
0
User avatar #70 to #67 - biscuitsunited (01/09/2016) [-]
Liverpool gets a bad rep
Its completely deserved, I didn't hate the school as much as I would of If I did sympathise with the sheer number of asshole kids they have to deal with.

Last year a 15 year old kid stole a teachers car and crashed it into a tree on school grounds, local newspaper and all
Reply
0
User avatar #71 to #70 - kegget (01/09/2016) [-]
You're from Liverpool? UK? Me too!
Reply
0
User avatar #243 to #71 - biscuitsunited (01/10/2016) [-]
Oh god
Which school did you go too?
Reply
0
User avatar #244 to #243 - kegget (01/10/2016) [-]
Broughton hall, then st admunds of canterbury
Reply
+1
User avatar #38 to #37 - froot (01/09/2016) [-]
Yeah, I got in trouble for wearing polka dot tights one summer. Like they were black tights with darker tiny dots up them. Then again the school required us to spend like £40-50 on a grey skirt with the school logo stitched tinily on one corner. They were all pencil skirts too (which do not look good on big girls, let me tell you). I bought a grey circle skirt and sewed the pattern in. School couldn't do **** - it was a grey skirt with the logo on, which was the exact wording in the school handbook.

My dad was also a little **** with uniform. He went to a private school on a scholarship and they had a rule about "self-dyed shirts", meaning a shirt all one colour. He dyed a shirt bright orange and brought in the dye packet.

But yeah, schools are so bad for actually encouraging learning. I entered high school a promising genius well capable of doing whatever I wanted. I left school with no faith in myself, my intelligence, or my future, with the only dreams I had crushed because my grades weren't good enough. Half of that was bullying, half of that was the school being **** . My Design Tech teacher straight up accused me of plagarism for an essay on retro design. In front of my dad. Who had watched me spend an entire afternoon on it, and check wording with him several times. Thus began the time when I straight up said no I'm not doing homework any more.
Reply
+7
User avatar #47 to #27 - doombunni (01/09/2016) [-]
I work at a school that requires uniforms, but it isn't to teach the kids what to wear in a professional setting (they're between the ages of 11-14 anyway). It's because the school I work at is in a high-poverty area, and its to ensure that the kids always have something respectable and clean to wear (we sell uniforms at very low prices or just give them to the kids who can't afford them). It also helps to level out the socioeconomic playing field in the school. It's all about brand names/having the latest **** with these kids, and teasing is already rampant since they're all pre-teens, so having them wear uniforms helps cut down on the amount of referrals I have to write
Reply
+1
User avatar #48 to #47 - froot (01/09/2016) [-]
Yeah, I get that's a reason for uniforms, and it's a good reason for them tbh.

I've always seen uniform and dress code as different but related things. Like a dress code gives some leeway in the specific items you wear as long as they follow those guidelines whereas a uniform is you must wear these specific items.
Reply
+25
#78 - warlordstuart ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
for the last goddamn time. its not about the stupid kids.

Teachers don't want to see stupid ass children in skimpy clothes. Male teachers are already assumed to be weird or perverts and if some stupid ass teen gets it in her head that she can get them fired by saying that the teacher was eye raping her it's not like there is any plausible deniability there. The school will fire the teacher just to take the heat off of themselves.

PUT SOME GODDAMN CLOTHES ON!!!
Reply
-9
User avatar #97 to #78 - severepwner (01/10/2016) [-]
Do people just have no restraint anymore? It doesn't matter how skimpy you look, if you as an adult aren't already uncomfortable with fraternization with your students, you were probably interested in doing it regardless of how they dressed.
Reply
+9
User avatar #99 to #97 - warlordstuart ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
t-shirt, pants, shoes. is this so hard? wear clothes. normal clothes.

there is an outfit for every environment. Cleavage and ass cracks are not suitable for an educational environment.

this isn't difficult.
Reply
-10
User avatar #100 to #99 - severepwner (01/10/2016) [-]
An educational environment is one of the only environments a young person will ever find themselves in. If you see what they use as normal clothes as "skimpy" then that's more of a problem for you then it is anyone else. Just have some god damn self control it's not ******* hard.
Reply
+7
User avatar #101 to #100 - warlordstuart ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
don't give me that "find yourself" ******** . I come to work ready to work, in every working environment I went to. From age 16 to today I did that. And if you plan to be a productive member of society you will top.

You will find yourself at your job, at your school, at your friend's house, at your house, literally anywhere you are literally constantly "finding yourself". Skimpy clothes can be worn anywhere else. just not in a school. get over yourself.
Reply
-7
User avatar #102 to #101 - severepwner (01/10/2016) [-]
Oh what a load of ******* **** . School is not "the workplace" to the students, it's school. This is where the majority of their social life stems from, and revolves around. Nothing about it, is a work environment to them.

Just because it's a job to you, doesn't mean it's a job to them. Because it ******* isn't.
Reply
+7
User avatar #105 to #102 - warlordstuart ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Guess what, kiddo. It IS a workplace. Here's the big scary secret, it's your job right now to learn so you won't be a worthless self-entitled, skill-less brat by the time you leave.

It's mandatory training. It's not free either. People pay taxes for that **** . They're investing money into your training.

Sports aren't there for your fun either. It's teaching you discipline, giving you a physical edge, drilling conformity and teamwork practices into your brain. Spots would NOT be offered at schools if they could prove it didn't have these benefits. You probably won't understand this now, but everything that schools offer is to try to form you into something worthwhile.

"But, the education system at school is all messed up! We don't need allot of classes. We need to learn to survive in a modern society"

That is correct. Which is what I try to push in my multimedia classes (How to use the internet, new media, etc) and this is why schools are offering business math rather than calculus. Home-ec and Sex ed are also being pushed because we need to shape schools into being the best learning centers we possibly can.

Ya know how students can help shape this environment?...

by PUTTING ON SOME GODDAMN CLOTHES!!
Reply
-8
User avatar #106 to #105 - severepwner (01/10/2016) [-]
The fantasy of the school board is not reality.

I've said it once I'll say it again. Just because you care about your workplace so much, doesn't mean they have to care, as much, as well. They won't and never will. Why? Because it's not a job to them like it is to you. When they get to their actual jobs, is when they start conforming to dress codes, and uniforms. Why? Because they get paid there, they're following interests THEY care about.

School is not a workplace to a student, it's school. Get off your high horse, and let people grow up on their own. If it's within reason as far as society goes, the same applies to school.
Reply
+6
User avatar #110 to #106 - warlordstuart ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
"If it's within reason as far as society goes, the same applies to school"

legitimately the only reasonable part of your argument that you have presented in this whole discussion. Seriously, keep going.

"find yourself" - Who cares, you can get that anywhere
"kids don't see it as a workplace" - Who cares. You have to do it anyway, it is the law.
"kids don't care" - their opinion is irrelevant.

Emotions and feelings do NOT MATTER in society. That's why Funnyjunk (and most people) hate the special snowflake mentality of Tumblr and Social Justice Advocates.

Seriously, keep it up!
Reply
-6
User avatar #114 to #110 - severepwner (01/10/2016) [-]
>Who cares they can get that anywhere

Yeah, like that school, that they go to 5 days a week for 13 years of their life. Their life, and social life revolve here.

>Who cares. You have to do it anyway, it is the law.

This is why kids don't care like you do, they have to be there. And them and every other student there doesn't care either, and that builds off each other. When they're at a place they choose to be, is when they start using professionalism. There is nothing that will ever be professional, about hundreds of teenagers locked inside closed spaces for hours at a time every day. Deal. With. It.

>Their opinion is irrelevant

As is yours.
Reply
+1
User avatar #125 to #114 - warlordstuart ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
ok. let's pretend for just a moment you are correct. let's say that we let the kids wear whatever and that it's the adults that are wrong.

It's just pervy grown men that have no self control and if they see a teen in a skimpy outfit, well, they just lose it and the lesson gets all ****** up. Wouldn't it be better if women taught instead?

But wait, what's this right here? Evidence? nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=28 oh gosh, it says that 74% of teachers are women. Why would they care about what little girls wear? do they have no self control?

Hold up, I'm being unfair. Maybe all these women are lesbians? they should contain themselves too....oh wait....more evidence... www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/07/15/what-percentage-of-the-u-s-population-is-gay-lesbian-or-bisexual/ This pesky little article says that only 1.5% of women are gay...Now, I may not be a numbers instructor buuuuuuut...Gosh, more pesky evidence. www.wisegeek.com/what-percent-of-the-us-population-do-teachers-comprise.htm 2% of the US population are teachers....

Since 74% of those are teachers that would mean that out of the 2.3 million teachers in the US that 1,702,000 lesbians occupy the school system...which is 21% of all gay people

Now, I know I'm just spitballing here but there is a chance that it's not just male teachers that don't want to look at little girls in adult clothes.

Now hold on. clothes don't matter, they're just helping kids find themselves. Right, there is no harm in that? Let kids be kids...except...I have yet ANOTHER piece of evidence that suggests that clothes DO affect kids behaviors.

Look at this! www.statisticbrain.com/school-uniform-statistics/ gosh golly willikers. Statistics from MULTIPLE CITIES AROUND THE US that suggests that school uniforms improve the performance of not only the students academic careers (mentioned, i said careers, not lifestyles) but the environment of the community around them.

But your right. 15 year olds should totally puff up their cleavage out if they want it because it helps them "find themselves"
Reply
-4
#132 to #125 - severepwner (01/10/2016) [-]
You do realize the first 2/3 of your argument favor mine and not yours? All that evidence basically shows the amount of people that aren't attracted to the women that aren't dressing the way you want them to. Which shows that how they dress doesn't and shouldn't matter to them. Basically you have provided evidence that there is even less reason on why they should care. If you're problem is that the staff are being distracted or aroused by these girls, well you just proved yourself wrong. Thanks, saved me some work.

The uniform thing is the only point worth considering here. And there's plenty of cons that don't make that the magic bullet of education. The removal of identity, the encouragement of removal of identity. That you're just another student in the interchangeable machine that is the education system, great. Forcing people into an even stricter dress code, which is one uniform. Do you just really not want people to have any liberty at all? Are you trying to run a school or a military? Next thing you're going to suggest is North Korea's very own 15 legal options of hairstyles.
Reply
+3
User avatar #154 to #132 - ilovehitler (01/10/2016) [-]
If your identity can be removed simply by having you conform to a dress code, it's hardly an identity worth having.
"Do you just really not want people to have any liberty at all"
Having people held to a decent standard of dress isn't exactly removing all of their liberty. It's not forcing them to take classes so they can be the person the State desires of them, it's not forcing them to interact only with those the State deems worthy, it's not any other tyrannical ******** . It's just wearing appropriate ******* clothing.
And, you know what? As soon as they get out of school, each day, they can wear what they desire. It's not prohibiting that.

Your entire argument here is literally just s slippery slope. You have no numbers, you have no data, you have no facts. And warlordstuart? He has all of those things. I'm not sure if you're *********** or are just literally retarded.
Reply
+1
User avatar #136 to #132 - warlordstuart ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
you kept telling me to "control yourself" implying its filthy adults who are staring at teens. its not about that...at all. Teachers don't want to see it at all. Ya know how there are sometimes ad-blockers to block ads because we just don't want to see them? Something like that.

Plus, consider my original point anyway. Teachers are not given any sort of defense anymore when it comes to sexual harassment and often times teachers are fired because the school doesn't want to come under pressure from the community defending them, even if they are completely innocent (ESPECIALLY if they are male). having a dress code that doesn't allow for any sexual interpretation is a layer of protection. It protects the teacher and helps create a more stable environment. If they kept firing teachers and replacing them the curriculum gets all jank.

And no, you can express yourself just fine in t-shirts, pants, sweaters, hoodies, shorts, whatever. There are literally tons of other clothes to wear. favorite band, favorite color, anime, comic, etc. wear that. if you wanna wear the cuttoffs do it on your own time. No one is forcing you to wear school standards outside of school.
Reply
0
#155 to #97 - semidemon ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
let me give you an analogy that you can hopefully get through your thick skull
if i go outside in only mu underwear, i will definitely get weird looks... now according to you, im entitled to being able to go outside with only my underwear and anyone that looks is a pervert...
logic mate, use it.
Reply
0
User avatar #189 to #155 - severepwner (01/10/2016) [-]
Well I wouldn't berate someone for dressing that way. And I wouldn't berate anyone who looks either.

I would berate someone who says they shouldn't be allowed to dress that way just because they don't approve. And I would berate someone for blaming others for looking as a crime or something.

Don't be so black and white dude.
Reply
0
#193 to #189 - semidemon ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
you cant look at it like that, we live in a society, a society has rules and norms
those rules and norms came into existence over many centuries with billions of people shaping and creating them
you not approving doesnt mean **** . society dictates what is normal/acceptable and what isnt
if you are so hell bent on going against society then go do something about the corruption in the governments or the economic inequality or just build yourself a farm in the middle of nowhere and live a self-sustained life outside society
otherwise, stop spouting your superficial nonsense
Reply
+1
User avatar #198 to #193 - severepwner (01/10/2016) [-]
Social norms aren't always right. They're often born of superstition, blindly following tradition, and just not thinking whether these norms are right or wrong. Social norms have been a huge contributor of injustice over the course of human history. Examples being racism, sexism, religious extremism, discouragement of free thought, not questioning elders or leaders, and many other wrongdoings. Social norms are not that great, they discourage free thought more than anything else.

>You not approving doesn't mean ****

I said this didn't I? So we're in agreement?

I don't know where you got the idea that I was going to save the world from itself, but one problem at a time I guess. I'm just a philosopher, and philosophy is figuring out the right way to think about things.

"Superficial nonsense"? Going this insane over how someone dresses is superficial nonsense. How am I the one being superficially nonsensical?
Reply
+32
#73 - logicalcommonsense (01/09/2016) [-]
GIF
B-but it's 2016....

Men need to grow up and control there rape urges.
Reply
0
#75 to #73 - anon (01/09/2016) [-]
their
Reply
0
#211 to #73 - billburr (01/10/2016) [-]
Are you against the point or for it? In this case the actual feminists are saying that men aren't rape hounds and that we are capable of seeing an ankle without humping it.
Why is it that everyone thinks the Muslim body-covering is barbaric but showing cleavage is slutty.
If everyone was naked we'd get used to it. Rape isn't a bigger issue on nude beaches than on regular ones, us men deserve a little more credit. And it's the feminists trying to give it to us
Reply
+4
User avatar #79 to #73 - purdon (01/09/2016) [-]
Shut up, shanayaya.
Reply
+4
#153 to #73 - semidemon ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
>men need to grow up
talking about 13 year old boys

>control urges
talking about an instinct developed over millions of years via evolution

bruh.
Reply
+8
#74 to #73 - DemonMatt (01/09/2016) [-]
Why you ****** gotta do that to Gothmog? He's not *that* ugly.
Reply
+14
User avatar #3 - SuperWeapons (01/09/2016) [-]
Im in the park with her, girls should be allowed to show all the melons they want.
Reply
0
#4 to #3 - anon (01/09/2016) [-]
Even granny Mcslipanipple?
Reply
+1
User avatar #5 to #3 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
That is a terrible idea. Least of all because they are children...
Reply
+4
User avatar #16 to #5 - badgoodass (01/09/2016) [-]
because kids aren't doing anything sexual in anyway, of course their instincts magically kick in when they reach their age of consent
get real
Reply
+3
User avatar #19 to #16 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
I'm well aware they're doing the sexual at each other, but a school is a learning environment and should be treated as such. How many people can turn up to work in a miniskirt and get away with it. Time and a place.
Reply
-1
User avatar #20 to #19 - badgoodass (01/09/2016) [-]
elementary to high school is mostly important for social interactions, seriously you can pass the tests with good grades without studying at all
social interactions include people getting into relationships and eventually hooking up
also unless your job is something easily replacable or something strongly connected with public appearance most of the time you can dress how you want, unless you come buttnaked or let like 90% of your skin show
Reply
+1
User avatar #22 to #20 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
You can get a date without showing leg. And even then it is absolutely NOT what school is for, it's just a side effect. Education should always take precedent over social interaction, since the latter is assigned plenty of time as it is. Schools are a place for people to learn and work, and whilst social skills are important they are not the focus.
Based on your using the term "high school" I'd wager you're american, and let me tell you your schooling is far easier than some places, but that's symptomatic of a problem, not of a "let's all just be social for 8 hours a day"
Reply
-1
User avatar #23 to #22 - badgoodass (01/09/2016) [-]
I'm from Germany
I got my highschool degree with a good grade average with barely any effort
90% of what you learn in school is useless unless you want to go into that field after school with the exception of languages and math
Reply
+1
#62 to #23 - kelex ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
True, but school trains your brain to be able to absorb any important information given to you in the future and make use of it. Without school, it'll probably take you days to know how to make McDonald's sandwich and pack it up for customers.
Reply
+1
User avatar #63 to #62 - badgoodass (01/09/2016) [-]
possibly, I'm no pedagogue
Reply
-1
User avatar #26 to #23 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
That seems unlikely, but it doesn't change the fact that schools have a purpose and chatting with friends is not it.
Reply
-1
User avatar #29 to #16 - admiralen ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Just cause something is probably gonna happen doesnt mean you have to support it
Reply
+1
User avatar #30 to #29 - badgoodass (01/09/2016) [-]
not support it but not prohibit it either
Reply
-1
User avatar #31 to #30 - admiralen ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Its not a good thing, so prohibit it, even if it wont stop all of it it will make it so it happens less
Its like going "crimes are gonna happen even if there are laws, so dont support them but dont prohibit them either"
Reply
+1
User avatar #32 to #31 - badgoodass (01/09/2016) [-]
>comparing crimes to hooking up
If they use protection noone suffers
Reply
-1
User avatar #33 to #32 - admiralen ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Hooking up isnt supposed to be done in school, and if you spend all of the lesson staring at a chicks barely covered ass nothing much gets done
So there are rules that are very logical and help for the school environment
Also, there are crimes where no one suffers, theyre still crimes all the same dude
Reply
+1
User avatar #6 to #5 - SuperWeapons (01/09/2016) [-]
when you are the teenage boys in the school you thing otherwise
Reply
-3
User avatar #7 to #6 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
>_> rapey.
0
#8 to #7 - SuperWeapons has deleted their comment [-]
Reply
0
User avatar #212 to #5 - habanaro (01/10/2016) [-]
"children"

In my last year of highschool I could legally vote and drink (18 in my province), but I wasn't allowed to wear a tank top when it was 30c out while the guys were allowed to wear muscle shirts.

Is a tank top professional? No. But I'd rather be comfortable in class to *actually learn* than sit there feeling sweaty and too hot and falling asleep.
Reply
0
User avatar #214 to #212 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Why couldn't you wear a tank top?
Reply
0
User avatar #215 to #214 - habanaro (01/10/2016) [-]
Dress code. Girls had to have at least quarter sleeves and necklines couldn't go below the level of your armpits.
Reply
0
User avatar #218 to #215 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Well that's a little odd but even so is a sleeve going to kill you?
Reply
0
User avatar #219 to #218 - habanaro (01/10/2016) [-]
Since I"m still alive obviously not.

Is there a difference between a tshirt and a tank top? I find there is. There's a lot of blood flow at your pits and having them covered helps to warm you up. Also, nothing like sweaty pits to make you focused on class and not on trying to make sure no one sees because you don't want to be laughter fodder. Oh highschool, how I don't miss you.

But as for your original point of sexualizing children-- this does not apply to just children.
Reply
0
User avatar #221 to #219 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Well I don't think most schools were thinking of comfort when planning the dress code. Suits are not comfortable but in a business environment people wear them because they look smart. Being smartly dressed does have an impact on the schooling environment, so I can see why there might be some regulations, but it should most definitely be unisex (within reason).
Reply
0
User avatar #222 to #221 - habanaro (01/10/2016) [-]
My highschool was largely trades oriented. I don't think there was an expectation for many of the boys there to end up being suits.

And yet the two degrees I went onto after that had no dress code and somehow the men seemed to graduate ok. You dressed as a professional for presentations and events and conferences. Not for your night class or dying in the library.

I could put out a facebook poll and ask if my shirts lowered the grades of any of my male friends, though.

Reply
+1
User avatar #223 to #222 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Yeah the whole "men see boobs and their brains turn off" is getting tiresome.
Reply
0
User avatar #224 to #223 - habanaro (01/10/2016) [-]
I felt in highschool that it just taught women that it's their responsibility how men think. I've found guys will look at my tits regardless of how much cleavage I'm showing.
And they look, and then resume living, and it's not a big deal. Sure there's the instincts mentioned in the post, but there's the rational brain on top of that.

Schools with policies like this don't prepare young men how to behave around women, they teach women to cover up to help control men. I'd like to believe that my male friends are functioning adults that can see a pair of tits and continue operating as the intelligent people they are.
Reply
0
User avatar #225 to #224 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Probably because you have nice tits xD

yfw school system ends up like Islam. "If you show your knees the men will find that super hot"
Reply
0
User avatar #228 to #227 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Oh well, what are you gonna do?
Reply
0
#230 to #228 - habanaro (01/10/2016) [-]
Happily follow a dress code at work because my office has air conditioning.
Reply
0
User avatar #231 to #230 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Oh you southerners and your air-con.
Reply
0
User avatar #232 to #231 - habanaro (01/10/2016) [-]
I live in Edmonton, Alberta. Yes. Southerner.
Reply
0
User avatar #233 to #232 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Why do you even have air conditioning?
Reply
0
User avatar #234 to #233 - habanaro (01/10/2016) [-]
Last I checked we still have summer and it gets hot. And I'm not important enough for an office with windows, sooo.

tbh i have the space heater under my desk turned on every day right now.
Reply
+1
User avatar #235 to #234 - platinumaltaria ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
You americans canadians and your ways xD
Reply
+6
User avatar #10 to #3 - Sewallman [OP](01/09/2016) [-]
Would it take your attention away from your education? Because that's the primary focus of an educational institution.
Reply
+1
User avatar #41 to #10 - brandonsharklow (01/09/2016) [-]
Weather a girl is showing anything or not, i've got a memory so i'll imagine what the hell she looks like naked. i'm distracted either way.
Reply
+1
User avatar #42 to #41 - brandonsharklow (01/09/2016) [-]
mind*
Reply
0
#11 to #10 - SuperWeapons (01/09/2016) [-]
i typed that with a sarcastic, *wink wink* kind of mindset
Reply
0
User avatar #12 to #11 - Sewallman [OP](01/09/2016) [-]
I figured as much. That's why I didn't go any further than to ask if it would distract you.
Reply
+5
User avatar #144 - zlawliet (01/10/2016) [-]
> Dress code
> Girls are forced to dress up, proper and lady like under all circumstances
> Young boys don't grow up learning to handle and control their sexual cravings
>Conditions their perception of women as frumpy unnattractive nuns
>Boy grows up
>Boy sees girl in short shorts with some cleavage popping out
>Boy doesn't didn't know his peepee could tingle like that
>Boy thinks that the girl most be dressing like that to provoke him because all girls are supposed to look like nuns
>Clearly shes asking for it
>Girl gets raped


Dress codes == Rape
Reply
-2
User avatar #149 to #144 - WutsAtroll ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
>girls are forced to dress professionally in all circumstances
>Therefore never dress up as sluts, problem never happens
Reply
+2
User avatar #150 to #149 - zlawliet (01/10/2016) [-]
but I like sluts ....
Reply
+1
User avatar #152 to #150 - WutsAtroll ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
well that's no surprise, considering one gave birth to you
Reply
0
User avatar #170 to #152 - zlawliet (01/10/2016) [-]
Maaan .... Come home after a ****** rough day to people calling my momma a whore on the internet Sucky
Reply
0
User avatar #173 to #170 - WutsAtroll ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
i had a great day. I called her a slut not a whore tho
Reply
-2
User avatar #181 to #149 - elcreepo ONLINE (01/10/2016) [-]
Moderation is key.

In the same way that you don't leave your $500 laptop visible in your car, you don't show off the goods to someone who will justify their attack with "they were asking for it by tempting me! Obviously!"

Not that a woman in short shorts or a person with a laptop in his car should be attacked, but that you must consider the implications of your actions. By saying it's "victim blaming" you're suggesting that the other person is too stupid to think and therefore it's everyone else who has to change.

Just wear short shorts with a normal shirt and cover your laptop with a blanket, is all I'm saying.
Reply
+5
User avatar #84 - nudybooty (01/09/2016) [-]
Dress codes aren't sexist. I don't see guys trying to wear shorts so short their dicks are hanging out.
Reply
+4
#43 - vorarephilia (01/09/2016) [-]
Booty shorts cover roughly the same surface area as panties.

therefore I am inclined to believe they are in fact, underwear.

and if I can't go to school in my boxers, you can't go to school in booty shorts.

Seems reasonable to me.

You know what isn't reasonable?

Convincing hundreds of teenage girls running around in underwear was a socially acceptable thing to do.

that is some pedo **** if i do say so myself.
Reply
+3
#55 - anon (01/09/2016) [-]
School, first and foremost, is a place of knowledge and learning. The only reason girls would wear those types of clothes is to gain attention. You don't see guys wearing only spandex or bulge improving shorts. Because males, for the most part, aren't retarded. Those types of clothes do not belong in a place of learning. It's only a distraction. That's all it is. If you get upset because you have to wear normal clothes that don't say " **** ME IN THE ASS" Because your ass cheeks are hanging out and your nipples are almost revealed, and if you really cant wear normal clothes when you are 14-18, your parents have failed you and you are an immature, weak person not capable of critical thinking. The only people that complain about this **** are rich kids, sluts, and retards. And the girl in this pic is an advocate of the latter of the three.
Reply
0
#57 to #55 - anon (01/09/2016) [-]
And by girl in the pic I meant the one wearing the shirt. Not the commenter.
Reply
+3
User avatar #54 - cupcakescankill ONLINE (01/09/2016) [-]
Simple. There weren't any girls wearing shorts on the moon.
Reply
+2
User avatar #126 - AngryRedMidget (01/10/2016) [-]
This is just insulting to any man, it's in the exact same vein of reasoning that forces women to wear head coverings.
Reply
+2
#117 - TopDawg (01/10/2016) [-]
I couldn't wear shorts in school either? Besides, I can't but feel this sluts 'shorts' are smaller than my ******* boxers.
Reply
+2
#50 - anon (01/09/2016) [-]
This is why we should just have school uniforms.


Be a whore on your own time.
Reply
+1
#220 - damson (01/10/2016) [-]
>comment section's fw

Can't we just leave people alone and not have to get all worked up over what pieces of cloth (or lack thereof) they have on their bodies?

What I really hate is when someone comes up to me and has to tell me about how disgusted someone's fashion choice made them. And then they get upset when I don't share in their disgust.
Look, you can call them a slut/whore/whatever. You can have your thoughts about "professional attire," and "time and place whatnot." You can keep on trying to define what's appropriate for other people to wear. Get upset at people's choices all you want. But don't try and make it my problem. I don't always like what other people wear, but I don't make a big deal about it or say they shouldn't be able to wear it. It seems to me though like people get offended if you don't fling insults at people who express themselves how they want to.
Reply
+1
User avatar #217 - imofcnotharveydent (01/10/2016) [-]
Why would a little skin in class be a big deal when we got more free porn than our ancestors could see in a whole lifetime?

any arguments both for and against? I wanna look for some ground around these things
Reply
+1
#204 - thehistorylover (01/10/2016) [-]
Nobody cares, but I'll put in my two cents anyway. The word on the shirt was short, not booty shorts, not mini skirt, not short shorts, but just ... shorts. When I was in school, from the mid-90s to the later 2000s, you could wear shorts all you wanted to, as long as they were of a certain length. My dad once told me a dress code thingy about when he was in high school. I'm pretty sure it was the 1970s. Lots of girls were wearing fashionable denim shorts to the public school. We live in an area where it can get hot as **** , BTW. I am not sure how short they actually were, but my father, who is a little old school, said that to this day he doesn't see the problem with the shorts the girls were wearing back then. They were eventually banned from the school. I googled some 1970s denim shorts, to get an idea of what they might have been. Might have been pretty damn short. Anyway, my dad did say that he couldn't remember seeing any butt crack at least, and short shorts are better than short skirts because at least they cover up the vulva.

While I think that dress codes are fine, to a certain extent, I also think that sometimes schools do go overboard. Some rules are left up to interpretation. Sometimes the rules are not enforced much, which leads to the students breaking the rules more often and the school stupidly wondering why the **** kids are dressing against the rules, and deciding to make an example out of one student. Some rules don't always make sense. Sometimes students are even punished for something that's not even in the damn rule book. Some rules are sexist as balls. Seriously. Some schools will allow girls to have long hair, but if a boy has long hair, oh no, that's problem! Keep in mind, my own father, who is manly as **** , had long hair for a large portion of my life. One of my ex boyfriends, who practiced MMA style fighting and looked like a damn superhero had long blond hair. Some schools will ban crossdressing, often to the point of misunderstanding certain clothing items. (I once read an article about a teenage boy who wore a Scottish kilt in an American prom, and was disciplined for cross dressing; it's like the school forgot that kilts are considered to be manly as balls, and there are softcore porn romance novels dedicated to the concept of a manly Scottish man in a kilt)

As for the whole "dressing like a whore" thing, well ... I think it's an insult to males to assume that they can't handle seeing a girl's leg without freaking the **** out and doing some rape. Really. I understand rules against showing your buttocks, genitals, and chest, because ... well ... those are sensitive areas, especially the lower bits. However, something as innocent as a leg, or even a shoulder, isn't really a big deal.

And schools don't seem to be preparing you for much anyway. In many areas, you don't wear suits and dresses to your job, especially where I live. My father wears jeans and t-shirts to work. He owns a Millwright company. Even when he was working for other people, he dressed casually. As for my blond ex, he worked for a HVAC company, and for himself on the side. For the company, he was forced to wear a uniform, which wasn't formal wear. It was made to get dirty and nasty. When he works for himself, he wears ratty and stained jeans and T-shirts. BTW, last time he talked to me, he had an expensive BMW. Dude is making bank, and he doesn't wear a suit. My current lover, who is my fiance, works in plumbing, gardening, and housekeeping. He doesn't even wear a uniform. Jeans and T-shirt all the way. Never even worries about a dress code, and he has a very beautiful truck, his own house, and a sweet PC. I know that there are plenty of places out there that either have a dress code or a uniform, but, at least where I live, the only places that require a dress code or uniform are schools, the Board of Education, and retails stores/chains, and even some stores let their employees wear casual clothes.
123>
[ 247 comments ]
Leave a comment
<
>
 Friends (0)